DEAD OF NIGHT (CAVALCANTI 1945) Ealing Studio played a central role in the development of the British film industry before and after World War II. It drew its actors from the London stage and connected to audiences with a middle-class populism that combined comedy with political acumen. Most famous for its films of the 50s (Kind Hearts and Coronets, 1949; Passport to Pimlico, 1949; The Lavender Hill Mob, 1951; The Ladykillers, 1955), Dead of Night (1945) celebrated the end of the war with a portmanteau project that offered four of its directors the opportunity to construct independent narratives com- bined into a single spooky tale about a recurrant nightmare of an architect who visits a country house. Arturo Cavalcanti came to Britain from Brazil, where he had begun as a failed law student (he had an argument with a professor) and was sent to Switzerland where he began to study architecture. After a visit back home, Cavalcanti took up a position at the Brizilian consulate in Liverpool, but he continued his interests in the arts, corresponding wiht Marcel L’Herbier, a promoter of the avant- garde film movement in France. L’Herbier offered Cavalcanti a job as a set designer. He returned to England to work on several projects, and joined Ealing in 1940, where he worked on a number of propaganda films for the war effort. As if to celebrate the end of the war, Ealing enlisted Cavalcanti and three other of its directors (Basil Deardon, Charles Chrichton, and Robert Hamer) to develop a horror film in the form of an anthology. Guests are in the midst of a “house party” at the rural estate of Eliot Foley. Foley wants to make improvements to his farm and house and has enlisted an architect, Walter Craig, to join them for a few days. Even as he drives up to the house, however, Craig has the feeling that he’s been there before. When he sees the guests, the feeling intensifies, and he tells each of them that they are playing a role in a circular dream that ends in tragedy. One of the guests, Dr. van Straaten, an immigrant psychiatrist (from Holland rather than Vienna, to avoid audience anti-war sentiment), explains Craig’s dream as a psychosis without significance, but the other guests defend Craig by revealing their own experiences with the uncanny. All of the stories involve exchanges between life and death. A race-car drive who barely survives a racing accident is given a premonition of a bus accident and avoids a “second death.” A young girl discovers a ghost at a children’s Twelfth Night celebration in an 18c. manor house. A Chippendale mirror continues to reflect the bedroom in which its former owner had strangled his wife out of jealousy. A cheated golfer commits suicide but haunts the victor in a comic-relief tale that allows the audience to prepare for the longest story, the psychiatrists own, about a ven- triloquist whose dummy gains the upper hand. Omens along the way lead the audience to the climax of the film, where Craig confronts van Straaten literally and the film “recycles” again to its innocent beginning.

*WHY THIS FILM?: I saw this film for the first time in 1984, when Marco Fra- scari and I, attending a meeting of the Semiotic Society of America, hap- pened upon a presen- tation by an engineer working for IBM who had plotted out the timing of the Dead of Night sequences. Marco and I were, however, more fascinated with the film’s seemingly complete - com pendium of virtuality, using space and time as the medium of transactions of life and death’s overlaps. Marco did not write much about Dead of Night later, but I included it in a number of essays, both to develop the idea of “detached virtualities” based on Borges’ idea of the fantastic’s four primary forms (travel through time, story in a story, contami- nation of reality, and the double) as well as to study the way the film used mul- tiple registers of narrative. Like Hitch- cock, Cavalcanti wished to engage the audience not on an intellectual but an The Master Trope: the Story in the Story emotional level. He pushed anxiety to fear and fear to fright (the three Freud- In the story in the story, the audience forgets where it is; it is hypnotized by this simple act by which the ian levels) with perfect timing (as the initial entry into the fictive world encounters another entry into another fictive world: < … <. This is the IBM engineer had shown). But, he had interval used by hypnotists; when you are preparing to be hypnotized (or preparing to resist hypnotism) also covered all of the possibilities of the “Freudian-Jentschian uncanny,” as you are already hypnotized. Your “first encounter” is really your second, and the equalization of the first generated from the primary states of and second entry point allows for the ambiguity of the interval you occupy. A “square-wave condition” AD and DA (the living person drawn develops, which is anamorphosis at its purest. Between the levels of φ and -φ, the audience allows for the to death and the dead person who has detachment of virtual spaces and creation of “poché spaces” into which anything may disappear and re- “forgotten how to die”). These poles and appear. In this liberated space-time, the audience advances from anxiety (Angst) to fear (Furcht) to fright their expansion also seemed to predict (Schreck) — the ideal route carefully constructed by any director wishing to be a “master of suspense.” Lacan’s use of the extimate to develop his own “detached virtuality” based on The key is the psychiatrist, Dr. van Straaten. Thanks to his resistance to the belief in the supernatural, the the part-object as the focus of the drives audience abandons the function of belief altogether. Siding with van Straaten’s realist criteria, they read- (oral, anal, phallic, vision, and sound). ily accept the evidence presented by the supporters who have, as “eye witnesses,” been forced to admit Anyone wanting to “illustrate” Lacan’s the multiple folds of reality. This literary form, known as the “Gingrich tale,” is like the magic performer interest in the imaginary and only one who relies on the audience’s skepticism rather than its belief in magic. Without skepticism, the transition example to use would be happy with from anxiety to fear to fright cannot occur. This film shows how! Dead of Night. The omen predicts a future and in a real The mirror usually just reflects the space in The ventriloquist’s dummy is the servant/ sense is a “pre-effect” of something yet to front of it, but in this sequence the mirror automaton that entertains by seeming to be happen. This premature temporal location “remembers” a past scene, which it repro- autonomous. The joke turns serious when turns the predicate of the effect around, duces while at the same time it interpo- the ventriloquist’s mind of subject to schizo- making it “turn” in a causal direction; in lates the modern user so that he becomes phrenia, and the voice created as an ideal this reversed position, it is one of many “predicated” by his own mirror. Reversed ego becomes the ego–ideal. The dummy is causes of a single effect (cf. the usual re- predication is equivalent to cross-inscrip- material with a small element of life (DA), lation of one cause to many effects). The tion: the past with its future-durable mir- while the ventriloquist is almost normal, but cause-effect reversal simultaneously re- ror is symmetrical with the future and its with a small element of the “dead thing” in- verses the temporal arrow. mirror stuck in the past side, drawing him toward death (AD).

cause 1 effect 2 < → > < → > < … < < → < < → < the omen as a cause the normal reflective the servant becomes the with the “wrong effect” function is reversed master, ambiguously

The Omen (travel through time) Contamination of Reality The Double Presented with an image of impending A well-to-do bachelor is given a mirror by Everyone experiences the double in the doom, subjectivity has a choice. “Will I his fiancée but soon discovers that the mir- form of inner voices, the function of the escape this predicted death, or will I in ror refuses to reflect reality. Instead, it is Idealich, or ego-ideal that regulates the fact not do precisely those things that will a portal on to the bedroom of its former ego by speaking from the inside. In the guarantee my ‘appointment in Samar- 19c. owner, whose confinement following final tale, van Straaten tells the story of rah’?” The race-car driver sees a hearse a riding injury compelled him to strangle a ventriloquist whose ego has been taken from his hospital window and recognizes his wife in a jealous rage. The same feel- over by his own construction, the voice of the driver as a bus conductor. The double ings overcome the modern owner, as he the dummy, Hugo. This amounts to an ex- sign persuades him not to take the bus, interprets his new wife’s harmless absenc- change of the Idealich with the Ich-Ideal, which crashes just after its stop. Yet, the es as liaisons with a rival. Note that travel the external “ideal ego” to which the sub- problem of to follow or escape the pre- through time and the double are involved ject looks as a model. The model in this diction persists with Craig’s observation in this optical contamination of reality. case is the “dead” Hugo, and the circular that every realization of his dream further Such is the case with detached virtuality — drive begin by the substitution of the ideal obliges him to live it out. This “double lock” one form will involve the others. The tricky ego by the ego-ideal leads directly to the enlists the audience’s sympathy for Craig mirror reminds us of Magritte’s Not to Be GAP — an impasse that can be resolved over van Straaten, and we realize that the Reproduced, where the mirror reflects the only by the destruction of Hugo. But, in doctor’s realism was there to pull us in that back, not the front, of its gentleman client. this story’s surprise ending, that’s not ex- direction. All along, we have been pulling Here, the mirror reflects more than an im- actly what happens. This is a psychoana- for Craig because van Straaten’s explana- age: it also projects the feelings and condi- lytic version of transubstantiation turned tions were simply not interesting enough. tions of the past, making the optics of the upside down! Because the psychiatrist is We were compelled by our own curiosity to present into a time-travel device able to narrating this story, the audience accepts it go from anxiety to fear to fright; our own shatter the distances of centuries. Watch as a veridical account; indeed, the facts of “death” (confrontation with the unpleas- to see how, in the climax of this scene, the story support the idea that the “magi- ant ending of the film) was self-driven and how the wife is finally “enlisted” by the cal exchange” is in fact a possibility in the self-engineered by interpreting omens as fantasy. construction of the psychotic personality. “inevitable.”

super-ego as Real FROM THE BORROMEO KNOT TO BLOOM’S REVISIONARY RATIOS (maternal/paternal) Lacan’s system is notably divided into three main parts: the imaginary (where the subject encounter its own mirror image as an “ideal ego” that casts its own bodily reality into abjection); the symbolic (networks of symbolic rela- ideal ego tionships, where the subject is interpelated by an “inner voice” of conscious ego–ideal that regulates its behavior); and the Real, taken over by the super-ego func- (imaginary) (symbolic) tion derived from the child’s relation to the mother and father. Because the “gaze” “voice” upshot of the three drives (oral, anal, phallic) is that the subject is left with a reserve of “negative space,” home is ambiguously a place and non-place, dominated by the phallic logic of appearance and disappearance — in short, REAL the uncanny (Unheimlich). Where the imaginary is regulated by the gaze, (traumatic/phallic) and the symbolic by the inner voice of the ego-ideal, the traumatic–Real of the super-ego is radically dæmonic. This is an over-presence that collapses φ/-φ the dimensonalities constructed by the subject to accommodate symbolic and “dæmon” imaginary relationships, and the only defense against this collapse is Bloom’s clinamen apophrades category of askesis: retreat. Yet, this retreat is subject to reversed predica- tesseræ kenosis tion, also known as cross-inscription. The manor house in the 12th Night story is haunted by the ghost of the murdered child (HC), a version of AD. “askesis” But the child himself has “forgotten how to die,” DA, and the CH expression is home/unhome equally valid. The house and boy alternately predicate each other. Unheimlich http://art3idea.psu.edu/metalepsis