DOCSLIB.ORG

2014 PSB Review 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2014 PSB Review 2 Job number ; Title of document : Draft status 1 N ovem b er 2014 2014 PSB R eview An in vestig a tion in to c ha n g in g a u d ien c e n eed s in a c on n ec ted w orld Con d u c ted b y ! sos "#R $or #$c om 14-041368-01 | FI !" | #$%"I& 2014 PSB Review ' T(is )or* )as carried out in accordance )it( t(e re+uirements of t(e international +ualit, standard for -ar*et .esearc(/ I01 '0'2':'01'/ and )it( t(e I3sos -1.I Terms and &onditions )(ic( can be found at (tt3:44)) )5i3sos-mori5com4terms5 6 I3sos -1.I '0145 14-041368-01 | FI !" | #$%"I& 2014 PSB Review 3 Contents 1 Summary of key findings .......................................................................................................................... 6 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 15 2.1 Background ................................................................................................................................................................. 15 2.2 Research objectives ..................................................................................................................................................... 16 2.3 Methodological approach ............................................................................................................................................ 16 2.4 Analysis and reporting ................................................................................................................................................. 18 2.5 Glossary ....................................................................................................................................................................... 21 3 Context: accessing television content ..................................................................................................... 23 3.1 Media use and access to TV ........................................................................................................................................ 24 3.2 Channels and services accessed ................................................................................................................................... 29 3.3 Common user behaviours ............................................................................................................................................ 33 3.4 Ways of discovering television content ....................................................................................................................... 35 3.5 Importance age and relationship with technology ....................................................................................................... 37 4 Perceptions of the value of television and PSB content ......................................................................... 41 4.1 Value of television in society ...................................................................................................................................... 42 4.2 Current understanding of PSB ..................................................................................................................................... 48 4.3 Attitudes to the individual PSB purposes .................................................................................................................... 49 4.4 Diversity and reflecting UK cultural identity in the devolved nations ........................................................................ 54 4.5 Views of PSB characteristics....................................................................................................................................... 58 4.6 Views of PSB by genre ............................................................................................................................................... 59 4.7 Generations analysis .................................................................................................................................................... 67 5 The future value of PSB .......................................................................................................................... 71 5.1 The role of PSB in ensuring high quality content........................................................................................................ 71 5.2 The role of PSB in informing understanding and stimulating knowledge ................................................................... 73 5.3 The role of PSB in reflecting UK cultural identity ...................................................................................................... 73 5.4 Representing diversity and alternative viewpoints ...................................................................................................... 76 5.5 New and original content ............................................................................................................................................ 79 5.6 Generations Analysis ........................................................................................................................................................ 81 6 Current delivery of PSB content ............................................................................................................. 84 6.1 Perceptions and use of the main five PSB channels .................................................................................................... 84 6.2 Perceptions of PSB portfolio channels ........................................................................................................................ 87 6.3 Use and perceptions of PSB catch up and on demand services ................................................................................... 90 6.4 PSB websites and web apps ........................................................................................................................................ 93 6.5 Non PSB brands and services providing PSB-type content ........................................................................................ 95 6.6 Generations analysis .................................................................................................................................................... 96 7 Future delivery of PSB content ............................................................................................................... 99 14-041368-01 | FINAL | PUBLIC 2014 PSB Review 4 7.1 Preference for on demand or scheduled content .......................................................................................................... 99 7.2 Views of alternative PSB formats ............................................................................................................................. 107 7.3 Expectations for children’s services .......................................................................................................................... 111 7.4 Generations analysis .................................................................................................................................................. 113 8 Appendix ............................................................................................................................................... 116 8.1 Discussion guide used in qualitative workshops ....................................................................................................... 116 8.2 Questionnaire used in quantitative survey ................................................................................................................. 132 14-041368-01 | FINAL | PUBLIC 2014 PSB Review 5 1 Summary of key findings 14-041368-01 | FINAL | PUBLIC 2014 PSB Review 6 1 Summary of key findings The media landscape continues to change rapidly. Since the last Public Service Broadcasting (PSB) review (2007/2008) there have been significant changes, including the completion of digital switchover, the launch of BBC iPlayer and other on demand services, and a significant rise in broadband access. These changes are having a substantial impact on the way people access content and how they choose what to watch, which in turn has implications for PSB. Ofcom commissioned Ipsos MORI to conduct a programme of qualitative and quantitative research for the third PSB review. The two overarching research objectives were: . to explore what UK citizens and consumers want from PSB now and in the future; and . to identify differences in views between age groups, life stages, and other demographic groups. This research report draws on two sources. First, a UK-wide quantitative survey among people aged 16+ investigating their attitudes towards television, the internet and specifically, public service broadcasting now and in the future. Secondly, a series of day-long deliberative workshops with people aged 18+, and two groups with young people (16-18), all with similar aims. Television content in context People continue to value the role that television plays in society, although the internet has become significantly more important since the last review. Television remains the most important source for a range of different activities and pastimes, particularly as a source of news. However, the internet has grown in importance and is now the most valuable media source for finding out about people who share similar interests and hobbies, and discovering new things. Overall, people are now just as likely to agree that the internet has an important social role to play (74%),
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Cranbury Vol
    THE CRANBURY VOL. XXI. CRANBURY, N. J., FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 1905. NO. 5 AT THE SIGN OF' THE SPAtJE. I1 Non" Mr. tenrey. Recording to his tnis ttiere wns ecncrnl linud- I llghtH, really meant to bo kind, but ho blinking, nnd a buffet luncheon wan ST JOB!! YAKCK CHXHKT- committed an alarming indiscretion EACE TREATY served In the cafe ncross the ball, tuc NEW JERSEYJTATEIDR O» aad on, in inn and sbndr, when, undeterred by his previous re- Itusslr.nK nnd Jnpnuesc inforinnlly drinking each other's hcnltb. Shortly Millions In Woman's Will. WASHINGTON. •, - Fooling over flat and grade, buff, he passed hi; arm coolly through It wns announced in Pnlcrson by the King and beggar, fo<. tnd friend, before 0 o'clock tbe Rmslnu mission official- appraiser thnt the cslrttc of President Roosevelt bnn demanded Come, at lost, lo the journey's end; Mcllnda's and fried to turn her steps left tbe ynrd for the tbrinksKlvIng ser- tho reslRiiatlou of F, TV. Palmer, Pub- otop naT) and maid In the direction of the river. IS SIGNED Mrs. Mary E. Ryle, who wiin known vice nt Christ Church, nlid thu Japan- • . At tie Sign of the Spade. lic Printer. In an instant she flung around" on ese returned to the hotel. throughout, tbe State of New Jersey for her philanthropy, wait valued nt •From Consul-Geiicrnl Rodgeni. n» •Sage'or rany, >lave or blade. him, with a burning tide of blood rush- THE SULTAN'S LOVE OF THE mnselor hnd been giving a lesson on *3.'i03,075.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadcast Bulletin Issue Number 45
    * Ofcom broadcast bulletin Issue number 45 10 October 2005 Ofcom broadcast bulletin 45 10 October 2005 Contents Introduction 3 Standards cases In Breach 4 Resolved 8 Other programmes not in breach/outside remit 11 2 Ofcom broadcast bulletin 45 10 October 2005 Introduction Ofcom’s Broadcasting Code took effect on 25 July 2005 (with the exception of Rule 10.17 which came into effect on 1 July 2005). This Code is used to assess the compliance of all programmes broadcast on or after 25 July 2005. The Broadcasting Code can be found at http://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv/ifi/codes/bcode/ The Rules on the Amount and Distribution of Advertising (RADA) apply to advertising issues within Ofcom’s remit from 25 July 2005. The Rules can be found at http://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv/ifi/codes/advertising/#content The Communications Act 2003 allowed for the codes of the legacy regulators to remain in force until such time as Ofcom developed its own Code. While Ofcom has now published its Broadcasting Code, the following legacy Codes apply to content broadcast before 25 July 2005. • Advertising and Sponsorship Code (Radio Authority) • News & Current Affairs Code and Programme Code (Radio Authority) • Code on Standards (Broadcasting Standards Commission) • Code on Fairness and Privacy (Broadcasting Standards Commission) • Programme Code (Independent Television Commission) • Programme Sponsorship Code (Independent Television Commission) • Rules on the Amount and Distribution of Advertising From time to time adjudications relating to advertising content may appear in the bulletin in relation to areas of advertising regulation which remain with Ofcom (including the application of statutory sanctions by Ofcom).
    [Show full text]
  • MGEITF Prog Cover V2
    Contents Welcome 02 Sponsors 04 Festival Information 09 Festival Extras 10 Free Clinics 11 Social Events 12 Channel of the Year Awards 13 Orientation Guide 14 Festival Venues 15 Friday Sessions 16 Schedule at a Glance 24 Saturday Sessions 26 Sunday Sessions 36 Fast Track and The Network 42 Executive Committee 44 Advisory Committee 45 Festival Team 46 Welcome to Edinburgh 2009 Tim Hincks is Executive Chair of the MediaGuardian Elaine Bedell is Advisory Chair of the 2009 Our opening session will be a celebration – Edinburgh International Television Festival and MediaGuardian Edinburgh International Television or perhaps, more simply, a hoot. Ant & Dec will Chief Executive of Endemol UK. He heads the Festival and Director of Entertainment and host a special edition of TV’s Got Talent, as those Festival’s Executive Committee that meets five Comedy at ITV. She, along with the Advisory who work mostly behind the scenes in television times a year and is responsible for appointing the Committee, is directly responsible for this year’s demonstrate whether they actually have got Advisory Chair of each Festival and for overall line-up of more than 50 sessions. any talent. governance of the event. When I was asked to take on the Advisory Chair One of the most contentious debates is likely Three ingredients make up a great Edinburgh role last year, the world looked a different place – to follow on Friday, about pay in television. Senior TV Festival: a stellar MacTaggart Lecture, high the sun was shining, the banks were intact, and no executives will defend their pay packages and ‘James Murdoch’s profile and influential speakers, and thought- one had really heard of Robert Peston.
    [Show full text]
  • Free for All? Public Service Television in the Digital Age
    Free for All 2/13/04 1:15 PM Page 91 With digital TV, producers can choose how they get programmes to us, and we can choose how we pay for them Free For All? Public service television in the digital age Barry Cox About Demos Demos is a greenhouse for new ideas which can improve the quality of our lives. As an independent think tank, we aim to create an open resource of knowledge and learning that operates beyond traditional party politics. We connect researchers, thinkers and practitioners to an international network of people changing politics. Our ideas regularly influence government policy, but we also work with companies, NGOs, colleges and professional bodies. Demos knowledge is organised around five themes, which combine to create new perspectives. The themes are democracy, learning, enterprise, quality of life and global change. But we also understand that thinking by itself is not enough. Demos has helped to initiate a number of practical projects which are delivering real social benefit through the redesign of public services. We bring together people from a wide range of backgrounds to cross-fertilise ideas and experience. By working with Demos, our partners develop a sharper insight into the way ideas shape society. For Demos, the process is as important as the final product. www.demos.co.uk First published in 2004 © Demos Some rights reserved – see copyright licence for details ISBN 1 84180 120 8 Typeset by Land & Unwin, Bugbrooke Printed by Hendy Banks, London For further information and subscription details please contact: Demos The Mezzanine Elizabeth House 39 York Road London SE1 7NQ telephone: 020 7401 5330 email: [email protected] web: www.demos.co.uk Free For All? Public service television in the digital age Barry Cox Open access.Some rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Report for the APFI on the Television Market Landscape in the UK and Eire
    APFI Report: UK, Eire and US Television Market Landscape • Focusing on childrens programming • See separate focus reports for drama MediaXchange encompasses consultancy, development, training and events targeted at navigating the international entertainment industry to advance the business and content interests of its clients. This report has been produced solely for the information of the APFI and its membership. In the preparation of the report MediaXchange reviewed a range of public and industry available sources and conducted interviews with industry professionals in addition to providing MediaXchange’s own experience of the industry and analysis of trends and strategies. MediaXchange may have consulted, and may currently be consulting, for a number of the companies or individuals referred to in these reports. While all the sources in the report are believed to represent current and accurate information, MediaXchange takes no responsibility for the accuracy of information derived from third-party sources. Any recommendations, data and material the report provides will be, to the best of MediaXchange’s judgement, based on the information available to MediaXchange at the time. The reports contain properly acknowledged and credited proprietary information and, as such, cannot under any circumstances be sold or otherwise circulated outside of the intended recipients. MediaXchange will not be liable for any loss or damage arising out of the collection or use of the information and research included in the report. MediaXchange Limited, 1
    [Show full text]
  • Childbblargest Shoe for Weak Ankles.Prlces from 75E.To Rem- Town, in All Styles; Including the Corset Range I
    .1" .Bee. 5, 1889.-S-IX APRIL ' PAGES. NTJMBER 14. VOLUME XII. NEWTOWN,. FRIDAY, SUICIDES. UontUr Eeport of lawtowa Academy tadiaf March 1889. Fearful Imcrea.se aad the 15, Season of 18891 That Cua Scholars enrolled, 49 a On Dajt A Harrow, " Spring; la Scholar dropped. lag Oe0rscription. 1S8a Our 12th annual opening of seasonable and reliable LYON Average daily attendance, Spring & HINDLEY. A recent issue of a daily paper contained an Per cent, of attendance, J18 account of not leas than seven suicides In ons Per cent, of IE1 "W" IB --A. JEZ, punctuality, O O T day, and published a large beading, as follows: Number of tardies, of - ATERAGS PERFORMED. CLOTHING! Is now taking place. In this stock will be found the finest display They all Boughs ;Death." One was a dia- OF a'OBK Shoes and ever exhibited in the State for Ladies', Gents' and courag-ed-,' broken old man, in whom life had Primary Department, Slippers tost all charm; another was a beautiful young Intermediate Department, 883 Children's wear. Dress Shoes, Business Shoes and, in fact, anything girt who taught refuge from despair. AU Academic Department different ways of their own Uvea ROLL OF HONORABLE MENTION- -, 90 PER obtainable in a First-rate- d House. The following quotations are ought taking FIRST There is a serious lesson CEKT.AlrDCPW4.RD. worthy of your consideration: in these terrible expe- - G. Peck. - riences. It shows that th C3- ZE3 1ST - mind for no F. Hoyt. S'- is deranged, F. Hubbell. M. Hubbell. Our lines of Shoes at 1 50 and $2 are mtnleT up In good style in French one in sober mind cvci j ana Button all sizes.
    [Show full text]
  • Open PDF 300KB
    Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee Oral evidence: The future of Public Service Broadcasting, HC 156 Tuesday 14 July 2020 Ordered by the House of Commons to be published on 14 July 2020. Watch the meeting Members present: Julian Knight (Chair); Kevin Brennan; Alex Davies-Jones; Clive Efford; Damian Green; Damian Hinds; John Nicolson; Giles Watling. Questions 106 - 217 Witnesses I: Dame Carolyn McCall, Chief Executive, ITV, and Magnus Brooke, Director of Policy and Regulatory Affairs, ITV. Examination of Witnesses Witnesses: Dame Carolyn McCall, Chief Executive, ITV, and Magnus Brooke, Director of Policy and Regulatory Affairs, ITV. Q106 Chair: This is the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee and this is a hearing into the future of public service broadcasting and also we will be looking at the issue of Covid-19 and how that has affected our witnesses’ company today and public service broadcasting more generally. Before we begin, I am going to ask any of the members to indicate whether or not they have any interests in relation to this session. Giles Watling: Yes, I do, Chair. I am an occasional recipient of royalties from ITV. Chair: Thank you. Our witnesses today are Dame Carolyn McCall, the Chief Executive of ITV, and Magnus Brooke, the Director of Policy and Regulatory Affairs, ITV. Thank you for joining us today. Dame Carolyn, would you outline for the Committee the implications that Covid has had on your business and your public service broadcasting remit more broadly? Dame Carolyn McCall: Sure. Thank you very much for inviting us to do this.
    [Show full text]
  • City, University of London Institutional Repository
    City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Magnussen, B. (1995). Minority language television - social, political and cultural implications. (Unpublished Doctoral thesis, City University London) This is the accepted version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/7767/ Link to published version: Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] MINORITY LANGUAGE TELEVISION - SOCIAL, POLITICAL AND CULTURAL IMPLICATIONS Birgitte Magnussen .. Ph.D. The City University, London "Communications Policy Studies" September 1995 - Table of Contents Chapter 1. Introduction 1 Chapter 2. Theory. 2.0. Theoretical Considerations • 6 2.1. Ethnicity 7 2.1.1. Definitions 7 2.1.2. Minorities: Territorial and Linguistic 9 2.2. Cultural Identity 10 2.3. Mass Communication Research 15 2.4. Territorial Minorities and Mass Media 23 2.4.1. Diffusionist Theories 24 2.4.2. Relative Deprivation 26 2.4.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Service Priorities in Transition
    Public Service Priorities in Transition: Catering for Minority Interests in the Public Service Media Environments of the UK and Finland Mikko Sihvonen A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Department of Languages, Information and Communications, Manchester Metropolitan University for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Languages, Information and Communications Manchester Metropolitan University May 2014 2 3 Abstract This thesis examines the impact of neo-liberal marketisation on the provision of two types of minority interest content; children’s and religious programmes, in the terrestrial broadcasting environments of the UK and Finland between 1986 and 2009. Utilising a customised explanatory model devised for this study: the Industrial Equilibrium Model, which combines elements of historical institutionalism and the Structure-Conduct-Performance Paradigm, the thesis provides an empirical record of marketisation-driven changes in broadcasting institutions and their impact on the provision of children’s and religious programmes. In so doing, the study allows us to evaluate the current state of and future outlook for minority interest content in the 21 st century marketised multi-platform broadcasting environment. The thesis demonstrates that notwithstanding significant social, political, cultural, economic and demographic differences between the UK and Finland, similar marketisation-driven changes have taken place in the strategies of broadcasting institutions. Increasing competitive pressures produced by liberalisation and reorientation of regulation have forced commercial broadcasters in particular to focus increasingly on majority preferences and populist content in their programming, while catering for minority interests occupies a lesser role in the agendas of these broadcasters. The thesis demonstrates that popular preferences increasingly inform programming strategies and production resource allocation.
    [Show full text]
  • Addressing Harmful Online Content: a Perspective From
    Addressing harmful online content A perspective from broadcasting and on-demand standards regulation Publication Date: 18 September 2018 About this document In the UK and around the world, a debate is underway about whether regulation is needed to address a range of problems that originate online, affecting people, businesses and markets. The UK Government has announced its intention to legislate to improve online safety and intends to publish a White Paper this winter. In July the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) Committee of the House of Commons published an interim report on disinformation and ‘fake news’,1 recommending that “the Government uses the rules given to Ofcom under the Communications Act to set and enforce contents standards for television and radio broadcasters, […] as a basis for setting standards for online content.” This discussion document is intended as a contribution to that debate, drawing on our experience of regulating the UK’s communications sector, and broadcasting in particular. It draws out the key lessons from the regulation of content standards – for broadcast and on-demand video services – and the insights that these might provide to policy makers into the principles that could underpin any new models for addressing harmful online content. 1 House of Commons, DCMS Committee, Disinformation and ‘fake news’: Interim Report, 29 July 2018. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmcumeds/363/363.pdf 1 Contents Section 1. Summary 3 2. Introduction 6 3. The public debate around online harms 7 4. Today’s regulatory landscape 14 5. Lessons from broadcasting regulation 21 6. Insights for policymakers considering a regulatory approach to online content 27 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing in the Media Peter Block
    Managing in the Media Dedication: To Kalpana, Elinor and Ruth Managing in the Media Peter Block (Editor) William Houseley, Tom Nicholls and Ron Southwell Focal Press OXFORD AUCKLAND BOSTON JOHANNESBURG MELBOURNE NEW DELHI Focal Press An imprint of Butterworth-Heinemann Linacre House, Jordan Hill, Oxford OX2 8DP 225 Wildwood Avenue, Woburn, MA 01801-2041 A division of Reed Educational and Professional Publishing Ltd A member of the Reed Elsevier plc group First published 2001 © Media Operations Management Ltd 2001 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any material form (including photocopying or storing in any medium by electronic means and whether or not transiently or incidentally to some other use of this publication) without the written permission of the copyright holder except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 or under the terms of a licence issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London, England W1P 0LP. Applications for the copyright holder’s written permission to reproduce any part of this publication should be addressed to the publishers British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Managing in the media 1. Mass media – Management I. Block, Peter 302.2Ј3Ј068 Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the Library of Congress ISBN 0 240 51599 4 Composition by Genesis Typesetting, Laser Quay, Rochester, Kent Printed and bound in Great Britain Contents Preface xi
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Informa UK Limited, Trading As Taylor & Francis Group
    © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journalism Studies on 22/08/17, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/1461670X.2017.13596 54 Thomas, R. (2017). Biting the Hand: using the relationship between ITV and Barclays to examine the political economy. Journalism Studies. DOI: 10.1080/1461670X.2017.1359654 Biting the hand: Using the relationship between ITV and Barclays to examine political economy. Abstract The Global Financial Crisis presented the media with numerous opportunities to tell dramatic business-based stories. However, the relationship between commercial news and the corporate world is often thought to be deferential, where advertisers wield influence over journalists who are reluctant to criticise those indirectly funding them. Because of these models of capitalist power dynamics, it is often assumed that journalists will take a gentle line when reporting the affairs of advertisers. However, such a normative ideal is essential in an era when evidence suggests that capitalism has not produced any “trickle down” benefits for ordinary people. By taking a multimodal approach including semiotic and critical discourse analysis, this paper examines the broadcaster/advertiser relationship between ITV and Barclays PLC. Using a critical realist framework, the paper finds that in contrast to well-established theories that advertisers shape and influence business news, post-financial crisis, the U.K's largest commercial broadcaster adopted a combative role towards a key contributor to their funding. In comparison, the nation’s main public service broadcaster – the BBC – was less probing. The paper therefore challenges any simplistic correlations between advertising and news output while also arguing that a political economy perspective remains relevant in today’s commercial news landscape.
    [Show full text]