DOCSLIB.ORG

Talent and Calling

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Talent and Calling GS 1650 TALENT AND CALLING A review of the law and practice regarding appointments to the offices of suffragan bishop, dean, archdeacon and residentiary canon This report has only the authority of the Review Group that produced it. This report is copyright © The Archbishops’ Council 2007. CONTENTS Membership of the Review Group 2 Foreword 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 5 Chapter 2 The Right to Appoint: The Existing Position 13 Chapter 3 Identifying and Developing Talent 21 Chapter 4 Fostering Diversity 34 Chapter 5 Choosing Suffragan Bishops 43 Chapter 6 Appointing Archdeacons 58 Chapter 7 Cathedral Appointments by Bishops 66 Chapter 8 The Role and Practice of the Crown 72 Chapter 9 The Deaneries of Bradford and Sheffield 95 Chapter 10 Recommendations 104 Appendices Appendix 1 Evidence submitted to the Review Group 108 Appendix 2 Relevant Previous Reports 112 Appendix 3 The Senior Church Appointments Code of Practice (1995) 118 Appendix 4 Cathedrals: An Historical Note 123 Appendix 5 Response from the Sheffield Church Burgesses Trust and Second Submission by Simeon’s Trustees 128 1 MEMBERSHIP OF THE REVIEW GROUP Sir Joseph Pilling (Chairman) *Canon Dr Christina Baxter *Canon Prof. Michael Clarke *Mr Aiden Hargreaves-Smith *The Rt Revd Jack Nicholls, Bishop of Sheffield *The Revd Rod Thomas *The Very Revd Robert Willis, Dean of Canterbury The Revd Canon Lucy Winkett * indicates members of the General Synod The following were also in attendance at meetings of the Group: Mr David Williams (Clerk to the Synod) Ms Caroline Boddington (Archbishops’ Secretary for Appointments) Dr Colin Podmore (Secretary) Ms Sue Moore (Assistant Secretary) 2 Foreword FOREWORD There have been several reports on church appointments in the last fifteen years. One of the themes emerging in the debate that led to our own work and in the evidence that we received was the hope that we would finally put the matter to rest. We know that we will be a sad disappointment to those who hoped that we would achieve that. The more we dug into the subject, the more we became aware of how much good work has been done and how much constructive work was in hand. We have tried to build on that. We noted that the appointments systems that we have been studying have evolved over the years, and also became aware that further change would be inevitable in response to future developments both within the Church of England and in society at large. The Church will continue to reflect on those developments, to sift them and to discern how best to learn from them in its own circumstances. This is not an argument for the appointment of yet more committees. The time for another review group may eventually come, but in the meantime it would be consistent with the approach we have taken for the Church’s procedures to continue to evolve, prompted in part by the expertise and experience of the two Appointments Secretaries. The motion that led to our group being set up asked for the Archbishops’ Council to report back to the Synod within eighteen months of the date of the debate, which was 17 February 2005. However one might try to interpret the precise words of the motion, the clear intention of those who voted for it was that our recommendations would be available for debate before now. Because our group had first to be appointed, submissions invited and dates for meetings identified, the first full meeting that could be arranged was in September 2005. The timetable would have left us little more than six months to consider the evidence, frame the recommendations and agree a report. We were assured that no-one intended that. Despite our failure to keep to the timetable we hope that we have responded positively to its spirit by keeping the Synod informed as we have gone along and by working as fast as we could. When I was asked to chair the group it was not difficult to spot that the group included people with different points of view. We had not been chosen to achieve easy agreement. With no experience of chairing senior church groups I expected to have a hard time. Instead I have been consistently cheered by the graciousness, patience and consideration that each member has shown in relating to the others. I cannot recall a group that has been easier or more rewarding to chair. We have all been in the debt of the five others who have been closely involved with our work but my own debt has been greatest. David Williams has used his grasp of all the current business of the Church to guide us when we were in danger of cutting across or failing to learn from work being done elsewhere. Caroline Boddington has been enthusiastic in helping us to identify good practice, in encouraging us to learn from it and in developing procedures that are worthy of the Church. Within the proper limits imposed by personal confidences, she has freely shared her experience to help us reach soundly based recommendations. Although she has not attended our meetings, Ingrid Slaughter has been a vital presence in the background, diligently answering various legal questions and checking the report to ensure that our references to the law are correct. Colin Podmore was also secretary of the group that produced Working with the Spirit (2001) – the ‘Perry Report’ on how diocesan bishops are chosen – and of the group, chaired by one of our number, that implemented it. Without his help, we would have taken much more time and it would have been harder to be confident that we had all the information we needed. His service to us, on 3 Foreword top of an existing full workload, has been literally above and beyond the call of duty. Sue Moore has provided consistently efficient and good-humoured support. We are grateful to all five. JOE PILLING Sir Joseph Pilling Chairman 17 May 2007 4 1: Introduction 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Group and its Work 1.1.1 Our Group was established in response to the following resolution, which was passed by the General Synod on 17 February 2005: ‘That this Synod (i) consider that the Church should adopt an integrated and consistent method for the making of appointments to senior ecclesiastical office (other than diocesan bishops) to ensure that all appointments are transparent and encourage the confidence of the Church in the procedures that support the final selection; and (ii) request the Archbishops’ Council to commission a working party (to be chaired by a person independent of the Council and the Synod) to review and make recommendations (without limitation) as to the law and practice regarding appointments to the offices of suffragan bishop, dean, archdeacon and residentiary canon, including: (a) the role and practice adopted by diocesan bishops in the making of nominations to suffragan sees; and (b) the role of the Crown in the making of appointments to the other senior Church offices referred to above and how it is discharged, and for the Archbishops’ Council to report back to the Synod within eighteen months of the date of this debate.’ 1.1.2 The membership of the Group is listed on page 2. Our chairman retired as Permanent Under-Secretary of State at the Northern Ireland Office in November 2005. The three other lay members are a theological college principal (also Chairman of the House of Laity), a solicitor and a university vice-principal, two of them being also lay canons. The four ordained members are a diocesan bishop (and former residentiary canon and suffragan bishop), a parish priest (formerly Director of Employment Affairs for the Confederation of British Industry), a dean (who chairs the Deans’ Conference) and a residentiary canon. 1.1.3 At our request, the Archbishops’ Secretary for Appointments (Ms Caroline Boddington) attended all meetings after our initial meeting. We are grateful to her for the information that she has given us and for her contributions to our thinking. 1.1.4 We met on thirteen occasions between July 2005 and March 2007, including a two-day residential meeting at Canterbury Cathedral. 1.1.5 In response to our initial invitation we received 141 submissions, from: 30 diocesan bishops and one former diocesan bishop 3 suffragan bishops 14 deans and two former deans 13 archdeacons 3 members of the Crown Nominations Commission 5 1: Introduction 22 other members of the 2000-2005 General Synod 13 Lord-Lieutenants 33 other individuals 6 corporate bodies 4 non-Anglican churches These are listed in Appendix I. 1.1.6 We spent two of our meetings receiving oral evidence, from: two diocesan bishops two members of the Appointments Committee two suffragan bishops two archdeacons the Chairman of the Association of English Cathedrals the Secretary of the Church Society the Director of the Cabinet Office Corporate Development Group a consultant with a ‘head-hunting’ firm By invitation, our Chairman also attended a meeting of those who chair diocesan Houses of Clergy. 1.1.7 A number of the initial submissions expressed views about the fact that the Dean of Bradford is appointed by Simeon’s Trustees and the Dean of Sheffield by Simeon’s Trustees and the Sheffield Church Burgesses Trust alternately. Accordingly, we held a meeting in Sheffield at which we received oral evidence about that matter from a number of individuals from both dioceses as well as from the patrons. 1.1.8 We are very grateful to all those who have given evidence to us, either in writing or in person. 1.2 The Scope of the Review 1.2.1 The Synod’s resolution referred specifically to the offices of suffragan bishop, archdeacon, dean and residentiary canon.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Value of Books
    The Value of Books: The York Minster Library as a social arena for commodity exchange. Master’s thesis, 60 credits, Spring 2018 Author: Luke Kelly Supervisor: Gudrun Andersson Seminar chair: Dag Lindström Date: 12/01/2018 HISTORISKA INSTITUTIONEN It would be the height of ignorance, and a great irony, if within a work focused on the donations of books, that the author fails to acknowledge and thank those who assisted in its production. Having been distant from both Uppsala and close friends whilst writing this thesis, (and missing dearly the chances to talk to others in person), it goes without saying that this work would not be possible if I had not had the support of many generous and wonderful people. Although to attempt to thank all those who assisted would, I am sure, fail to acknowledge everyone, a few names should be highlighted: Firstly, thank you to all of my fellow EMS students – the time spent in conversation over coffees shaped more of this thesis than you would ever realise. Secondly, to Steven Newman and all in the York Minster Library – without your direction and encouragement I would have failed to start, let alone finish, this thesis. Thirdly, to all members of History Node, especially Mikael Alm – the continued enthusiasm felt from you all reaches further than you know. Fourthly, to my family and closest – thank you for supporting (and proof reading, Maja Drakenberg) me throughout this process. Any success of the work can be attributed to your assistance. Finally, to Gudrun Andersson – thank you for offering guidance and support throughout this thesis’ production.
    [Show full text]
  • St Hilda`S Church, Bilsdale Priory List of Incumbents from 1407 to Present Day
    St Hilda`s Church, Bilsdale Priory List of incumbents from 1407 to present day 1407 William May 17th Thomas Barker de Billesdale Sep. in cimiterio de Byllesdale Domino Willelmo, capellano,xyd. Ad unam candela exhibendum coram Trinitate in caella predicta, vs. (Reg. Test.,iii269d.) 1476 Richard Graye May 20th Willelmus Horsley de Bylesdale Sep. in cimiterio capelle de Bilesdale, Ricardo Graye, vicario ibidem, meum optimum animal, nomine mortuarii mei. (Reg. Test., IV,91d.) 1542 Thomas Swaill Oct 24th Lawrence Kirke of Billisdale. My soul to God Almightie, to his mother Marie, and all the hevynlie company, and my bodie to be buried in the church erthe of sancta Ilde in Billisdale. My curate Sir Thomas Swaill a witness. (Reg. Test.,xi,653d.) 1572 Michael Watson Lawsuit. George Rudd c. Richard and Walt. Bankes- a debt for 6s.8d. for “browne bleize cloth” bought by or for Michael Watson priest of Bilsdale 1572. 1599-1633+ Anthony Lainge He was ordained priest in Durham Cathedral in 1590 and became curate of Bilesdale in 1599. He was mentioned in visitation calls until 1633. 1640 John Leng Was mentioned in visitation calls of 1640 1662-1684+ Raduphus(Ralph) Hague (or Haighe) Deacon in 1638, priest in 1639. Moneren Preacher diocesan (ie Licenced to preach within the diocese and province). Curate of Bilsdale 1662. Visitation calls till 1674. Mentioned in Parish Register in 1684. 1680 Henry Mason Was Curate of Ingleby Greenhow and was a subscriber in 1680 and 1697 as Curate of Bilsdale. 1690-1720 Richard Carr Son of Robt. Carr vicar of Kirby-in-Cleveland.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eagle 1946 (Easter)
    THE EAGLE ut jVfagazine SUPPORTED BY MEMBERS OF Sf 'John's College St. Jol.l. CoIl. Lib, Gamb. VOL UME LIl, Nos. 231-232 PRINTED AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS FOR SUBSCRIBERS ON L Y MCMXLVII Ct., CONTENTS A Song of the Divine Names . PAGE The next number shortly to be published will cover the 305 academic year 1946/47. Contributions for the number The College During the War . 306 following this should be sent to the Editors of The Eagle, To the College (after six war-years in Egypt) 309 c/o The College Office, St John's College. The Commemoration Sermon, 1946 310 On the Possible Biblical Origin of a Well-Known Line in The The Editors will welcome assistance in making the Chronicle as complete a record as possible of the careers of members Hunting of the Snark 313 of the College. The Paling Fence 315 The Sigh 3 1 5 Johniana . 3 16 Book Review 319 College Chronicle : The Adams Society 321 The Debaj:ing Society . 323 The Finar Society 324 The Historical Society 325 The Medical Society . 326 The Musical Society . 329 The N ashe Society . 333 The Natural Science Club 3·34 The 'P' Club 336 Yet Another Society 337 Association Football 338 The Athletic Club 341 The Chess Club . 341 The Cricket Club 342 The Hockey Club 342 L.M.B.C.. 344 Lawn Tennis Club 352 Rugby Football . 354 The Squash Club 358 College Notes . 358 Obituary: Humphry Davy Rolleston 380 Lewis Erle Shore 383 J ames William Craik 388 Kenneth 0 Thomas Wilson 39 J ames 391 John Ambrose Fleming 402 Roll of Honour 405 The Library .
    [Show full text]
  • MAILING CONTENTS PAGE.Pub
    Clergy Mailing - June 2015 Contents 1. Nifty Notes 2. Ministry Vacancies Niftynotes news & information from the Diocese www.southwell.anglican.org JUNE 2015 Compiled by Nicola Mellors email: [email protected] Election of new Bishop of Southwell & Nottingham is confirmed he Archbishop of York led a service last month which Tincluded the ‘confirmation of election’ of Bishop-elect the Right Reverend Paul Williams, who is now legally the Bishop of Southwell & Nottingham. The confirmation at York Minster gave Bishop Paul spiritual jurisdiction over the Diocese and ensured all legal processes had been properly and carefully carried out. It was also the moment when he took his oaths of allegiance and canonical obedience. Photo:and learning Bishop Paul how with the his Church wife Sarah can and his advocate, J Handley Moule "It was truly joyful and inspiring and learning how the Church can to be in York Minster for my continue to make a big difference In this month’s issue: Confirmation as Bishop of in every community, as we live as 2 News in brief Southwell and Nottingham, people of hope in Jesus Christ.” supported by family, friends and The next stage of the process is 3 Synod Report new colleagues in the Diocese,” for Bishop Paul to pay homage to Events & information said Bishop Paul. the Queen, acknowledging her as 4 Sovereign and Supreme 5 Prayer Diary “It is a huge privilege to be called Governor, during a brief private to love and serve the Diocese as ceremony at Buckingham Palace. ` 9 Training Courses their new bishop.
    [Show full text]
  • This Work Is Protected by Copyright and Other Intellectual Property Rights
    This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights and duplication or sale of all or part is not permitted, except that material may be duplicated by you for research, private study, criticism/review or educational purposes. Electronic or print copies are for your own personal, non- commercial use and shall not be passed to any other individual. No quotation may be published without proper acknowledgement. For any other use, or to quote extensively from the work, permission must be obtained from the copyright holder/s. Vernacular Writings in the Medieva} Libraries of Great Britain I Glenise Scott, Ph.0. thesis, Keel e, 1 980. ABSTRACT The thesis comprises four volumes: an introductory discussion; two volumes containing lists of religious and other institutions with information on the works in the vernacular languages which they are known to have owned; and a volume of indices and bibliographies. The information is obtained from the surviving books of the medieval period, here taken as extending to 1540, which are known to have belonged to the religious and other houses, and from their medieval catalogues, book-lists and other documents. With the help of the indices, one may find the information relevant to a particular house, to an Anglo-Saxon, French or English work, or to a given manuscript. The introduction makes some general’observations concerning the libraries and books of medieval institutions, lists the medieval catalogues and book-lists chronologically, and considers the various kinds of vernacular writings, with particular reference to their production and ownership by the religious houses. Finally, some areas for further research are indicated.
    [Show full text]
  • Appointment of Archdeacon of Nottingham January 2019
    Appointment of Archdeacon of Nottingham January 2019 Growing Disciples Wider Younger Deeper CONTENTS Introduction by the Bishop of Southwell & Nottingham CONTEXT 1. The Diocese of Southwell & Nottingham 2. The Archdeaconry of Nottingham 3. The Diocesan Vision and Strategic aspirations 4. Progress in development and implementation of Diocesan Vision 5. Questions we are asking ourselves at this time THE ARCHDEACON OF NOTTINGHAM 6. The Role Specification 7. Statutory Responsibilities 8. The Person Specification PRACTICAL MATTERS 9. Terms and Conditions 10. How to apply 11. Further Information APPENDICES A. Theological Foundations for Growing Disciples B. Diocesan Vision for Growing Disciples C. Your Stories D. Parish Share Growing Disciples Wider Younger Deeper 2 January 2019 Dear Candidate, Thank you for your interest in the appointment of the Archdeacon of Nottingham. This is a strategic appointment to the diocese at a time of significant development and opportunity in seeking to fulfil our aspirations in Growing Disciples, reaching wider, younger and deeper. You will find out more about the shape of our work as you read through the document, an appraisal of the progress made and the fruit we are seeking. You will also learn of some of the questions we are asking ourselves as we continue the journey together as followers of Christ Jesus. I became diocesan bishop in 2015 and am inspired by the missional landscape in which we are called to bear witness to Christ and participate in growing the Church in all the diverse settings and communities we serve the purposes of God. I am also continually moved and inspired by the people of God who share in this ministry, lay and ordained, for their creativity, courage and compassion.
    [Show full text]
  • Download 1 File
    GHT tie 17, United States Code) r reproductions of copyrighted Ttain conditions. In addition, the works by means of various ents, and proclamations. iw, libraries and archives are reproduction. One of these 3r reproduction is not to be "used :holarship, or research." If a user opy or reproduction for purposes able for copyright infringement. to accept a copying order if, in its involve violation of copyright law. CTbc Minivers U^ of Cbicatjo Hibrcmes LIGHTFOOT OF DURHAM LONDON Cambridge University Press FETTER LANE NEW YORK TORONTO BOMBAY CALCUTTA MADRAS Macmillan TOKYO Maruzen Company Ltd All rights reserved Phot. Russell BISHOP LIGHTFOOT IN 1879 LIGHTFOOT OF DURHAM Memories and Appreciations Collected and Edited by GEORGE R. D.D. EDEN,M Fellow Pembroke Honorary of College, Cambridge formerly Bishop of Wakefield and F. C. MACDONALD, M.A., O.B.E. Honorary Canon of Durham Cathedral Rector of Ptirleigb CAMBRIDGE AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS 1933 First edition, September 1932 Reprinted December 1932 February PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN 1037999 IN PIAM MEMORIAM PATRIS IN DEO HONORATISSIMI AMANTISSIMI DESIDERATISSIMI SCHEDULAS HAS QUALESCUNQUE ANNOS POST QUADRAGINTA FILII QUOS VOCITABAT DOMUS SUAE IMPAR TRIBUTUM DD BISHOP LIGHTFOOT S BOOKPLATE This shews the Bishop's own coat of arms impaled^ with those of the See, and the Mitre set in a Coronet, indicating the Palatinate dignity of Durham. Though the Bookplate is not the Episcopal seal its shape recalls the following extract from Fuller's Church 5 : ense History (iv. 103) 'Dunelmia sola, judicat et stola. "The Bishop whereof was a Palatine, or Secular Prince, and his seal in form resembleth Royalty in the roundness thereof and is not oval, the badge of plain Episcopacy." CONTENTS .
    [Show full text]
  • Durham Cathedral Annual Review and Accounts Year Ended 31 March
    DURHAM CATHEDRAL ANNUAL REVIEW AND ACCOUNTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2019 Durham Cathedral, AcCounts for the year ended 31 MarCh 2019 Durham Cathedral Is a ChrIsJan ChurCh of the AnglICan CommunIon, the shrIne of St Cuthbert and the seat of the BIshop of Durham. It is a focus of pIlgrimage and spIritualIty in North East England. Our Purpose Our purpose is to worship God, share the gospel of Jesus Christ, welcome all who come, celebrate and pass on our rich Chris:an heritage and discover our place in God’s crea:on. Our Vision Following the example of Saints Cuthbert and Bede, we share our faith and heritage globally and empower people to transform the communi:es in which we live and serve. Our Place We inhabit a treasured sacred space set in the natural and human landscape of the World Heritage Site. What We Do Six areas of life, experienced as strands in a rope which, as they interweave, touch and support each other, make Durham Cathedral what it is today. 1. WorshIp and SpIrItualIty We worship God through daily prayer and praise, and celebrate the contribu:ons of music and art to the spiritual life of the Cathedral. 2. WelCome and Care We welcome all who cross our threshold and express Chris:an care in all aspects of our life as a community. 3. Learning, Nurture and FormaJon We help people to encounter God and grow in faith and discipleship by offering opportuni:es for dialogue, learning and research. 4. Outreach and Engagement We work in ac:ve partnerships for the good of the Diocese and the communi:es of North East England and to contribute to Durham’s flourishing and significance.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Magdalen College Record
    Magdalen College Record Magdalen College Record 2017 2017 Conference Facilities at Magdalen¢ We are delighted that many members come back to Magdalen for their wedding (exclusive to members), celebration dinner or to hold a conference. We play host to associations and organizations as well as commercial conferences, whilst also accommodating summer schools. The Grove Auditorium seats 160 and has full (HD) projection fa- cilities, and events are supported by our audio-visual technician. We also cater for a similar number in Hall for meals and special banquets. The New Room is available throughout the year for private dining for The cover photograph a minimum of 20, and maximum of 44. was taken by Marcin Sliwa Catherine Hughes or Penny Johnson would be pleased to discuss your requirements, available dates and charges. Please contact the Conference and Accommodation Office at [email protected] Further information is also available at www.magd.ox.ac.uk/conferences For general enquiries on Alumni Events, please contact the Devel- opment Office at [email protected] Magdalen College Record 2017 he Magdalen College Record is published annually, and is circu- Tlated to all members of the College, past and present. If your contact details have changed, please let us know either by writ- ing to the Development Office, Magdalen College, Oxford, OX1 4AU, or by emailing [email protected] General correspondence concerning the Record should be sent to the Editor, Magdalen College Record, Magdalen College, Ox- ford, OX1 4AU, or, preferably, by email to [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • TV Presenter Launches Lily Appeal
    E I D S Morality in the IN financial world explored E6 THE SUNDAY, MARCH 10, 2013 No: 6167 www.churchnewspaper.com PRICE £1.35 1,70j US$2.20 CHURCH OF ENGLAND THE ORIGINAL CHURCH NEWSPAPER ESTABLISHED IN 1828 NEWSPAPER Wakefield rebuffs plan for merger of dioceses FOLLOWING the failure of the Diocese of changed by the proposal. Blackburn will burn has voted. He can allow the plan to go Speaking after votes, Professor Michael Wakefield to approve the plan to replace receive six parishes and Sheffield will to General Synod if he is satisfied that the Clark, chair of the commission that pro- three Yorkshire dioceses with one it falls to receive two parishes if the plan goes ahead. interest of the diocese withholding consent duced the plan said: “It is good to know that the Archbishop of York to decide whether Sheffield Diocese has already signified is so small that it should not prevent the the dioceses of Bradford and Ripon and the proposal should go to General Synod, its agreement and Blackburn Diocese is scheme being referred to General Synod or Leeds support the Commission’s propos- possibly in July. due to vote on 13 April. if he feels there are wider factors affecting als. Looking at the voting in Wakefield, In voting last Saturday both the Diocese The Archbishop of York will not be able the Province or the Church of England as a there is significant support there although of Ripon and Leeds and the Diocese of to announce his decision until after Black- whole that need to be considered.
    [Show full text]
  • St M Newsletter No 13
    the church on Parliament Square by kind permission of Clare Weatherill NEWS No 13 Summer 2019 news and features from St Margaret’s ORDINARY TIME WHAT CAN WE DO? St Margaret’s role in the Church of England initiative on modern slavery It is a hard art to learn, Modern slavery is an umbrella term for all forms of slavery, trafficking and exploitation. At its core catching quiet is a trail of deception, control and often violence that is estimated to affect 136,000 victims in the by palms raised UK alone, and 40.3 million worldwide. Survivors, often vulnerable individuals, tell of offers of cupped in opportunities and a better life, only to find themselves in an isolated and restricted environment, air shifting location with little or no pay, with threats of harm to themselves or their families. here and there like The National Crime Agency’s statistics show that domestic slavery – always hidden and trying to guess the pattern of falling leaves, difficult to detect – is very prevalent in Westminster. In recognition of this, collections at and hoping to feel Westminster Abbey and St Margaret’s go to support a local hostel (in an undisclosed location, of the soft descent of moments course) which supports those who manage to break free or are rescued from this type of slavery. when silence slips Last year, St Margaret’s between sounds. also hosted an NCA This ordinary time is display on human gifted with days, trafficking and modern weeks of mundane grace slavery outside the church routinely following the liturgy where striking of hours anticipating creation photographs brought the tuning its prayer and praise to the issue to the attention of rhythms of incarnate love.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 October 2019
    October 2019 £1 1 2 Holy Trinity Team We welcome back Patrick from his sabbatical and this magazine includes some of his insights about his time away. We were also very sad to hear of the death of Andrea Blood and have included tributes to her. Revd. Patrick Taylor Remember we love to receive articles and photographs Vicar for the magazine which can be sent to the e-mail address below. Editor - Revd Patrick Taylor Design Editor - Felicity Howlett Features Editor - Judith Dorricott Associate Editor - Anthony Woollard Subscriptions & Distribution - Carole Askew & Paul Lageu 01789 298302, [email protected] Advertising - Karen Hollis Email: [email protected] PCC Representative - Ruth Poulten Revd. Steve Jarvis Please note that views expressed in Trinity Times are those Associate Vicar of the contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Parochial Church Council. The next magazine will be the November 2019 edition and will be in church on 27 October The copy date is 11 October If any item is left until the very last minute, or received after the copy date, there is no guarantee that it will be able to be included in the magazine. Please send any contributions of articles or pictures as attachments to: Revd. Kay Dyer [email protected] Associate Priest The Annual Subscription to Trinity Times for 2019 is £8 and runs from January to December. Anyone taking out a subscription part way through the year will be charged on a pro rata basis. If you are interested in taking out an Annual Subscription then please contact either Paul Lageu (01789 298 302) or Carole Askew (01789 266 940) #HolyTrinityonsocialmedia Front cover :- “Destination Reached”- Patrick and Paul beside a sculpture of monks carrying the coffin of St Cuthbert, in Lindisfarne parish church.
    [Show full text]