Dependence of Cellular Potential on Ionic Concentrations. Data Supporting a Modification of the Constant Field Equation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dependence of Cellular Potential on Ionic Concentrations. Data Supporting a Modification of the Constant Field Equation DEPENDENCE OF CELLULAR POTENTIAL ON IONIC CONCENTRATIONS Data Supporting a Modification of the Constant Field Equation DONALD C. CHANG Department ofPhysiology, Baylor College ofMedicine, Houston, Texas 77030, and Department of Physics, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77001 ABSTRACT The resting potential in the squid axon has been measured at various concentrations of Cl, K, Na, and Ca ions. The results of these measurements are compared with the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz (GHK) equation and a modified constant field equation. This modified equation was derived by including currents carried by divalent ions and the effects of the unstirred layer and the periaxonal space. It is shown that, although the GHK equation can fit the Vvs. [KJO data well, it has difficulty explaining the observed dependence of Von [Na]0 when the axon is bathed in K-free artificial sea water. The use of the modified constant field equation removes this difficulty. INTRODUCTION include the effects of currents carried by divalent ions and The Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz (GHK) equation is one of the effects of the unstirred layer and the periaxonal space. the most widely used equations in electrobiology. This This modified constant field equation seems to fit the equation not only provides a theoretical basis to explain the experimental data satisfactorily. relationship between the membrane potential and the ionic concentration gradients, but it also allows one to calculate METHODS AND MATERIALS the permeability ratios of the ions, using measurements of The biological sample used in this study is the giant axon of the squid potential. It has long been recognized, however, that the loligopealei, supplied by the Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, GHK equation is an approximation that involves many MA, where the experiments were conducted. Use of the squid axon to study the resting potential provides several advantages: (a) the structure idealized assumptions (Hodgkin and Katz, 1949; Tasaki, of the giant axon is simple, so that complications due to transport among 1968; Schwartz, 1971). Some ofthese assumptions, such as multiple compartments are eliminated; (b) the giant axon is large, so that constant field and ion independence, may be hard tojustify an axial electrode can be inserted and damage to the membrane can be in a biological system. Furthermore, the derivation of the avoided; (c) the giant axon can be perfused internally, so that both the GHK equation does not consider currents carried by internal and external ionic concentrations can be changed; and (d) because of the large cell size and the low impedance of the axial electrode, divalent ions, and the effect ofthe "unstirred layer" outside the resting potential of the squid axon usually is very stable and varies the membrane has been ignored. Thus, it is important to little (at most a few millivolts) from axon to axon. see how well the GHK equation can be applied to different The design of the experimental apparatus was similar to those used in biological systems. the laboratories of Narahashi (Wu and Narahashi, 1973) and Tasaki In this paper, I report results of measurements of the (Tasaki et al., 1965). The axon was perfused through a single glass cannula; the technique is a modification of that of Tasaki (Tasaki et al., resting potential in squid axons as a function of the 1965). The resting potential was measured by using an axial internal external concentrations of Cl, Na, K, and Ca ions, and of electrode and an external reference electrode. These electrodes are glass the internal concentration of Cl ions. I show that the GHK capillaries filled with 3 M KCI solution that was in contact with an equation can fit the observed data only partially. Some of Ag-AgCI electrode. Each of these electrodes was connected to a high the ionic dependence of the resting potential is difficult to input impedance operational amplifier (Analog Devices, Inc., Norwood, MA, model AD506), the differential output of which was recorded by explain. digital electronics. One wonders whether this observed difficulty of the The junction potentials of the electrode system are corrected by using GHK equation is due mainly to the deficiency of the an experimental arrangement similar to those used by Baker et al. (1964). constant field approach, or to the failure of other simplify- That is, before it was inserted into an axon, the internal electrode was first ing assumptions involved in the derivation of the GHK placed into a reservoir of 0.6 M KCI solution that was connected to a pool of artificial sea water by a salt bridge (made with artificial sea water equation. In this study, the latter case has been investi- [ASW] in 3% agarose). The reference electrode was in contact with the gated. Without abandoning the constant field assumption, pool of ASW through another salt bridge. The differential output of the I have suggested a modification of the GHK equation to two electrodes is defined as Vff,, which supposedly contains all junctional BIOPHYS. J. e Biophysical Society * 0008-3495/83/08/149/08 $1.00 149 Volume 43 August 1983 149-156 TABLE I COMPOSITION OF ARTIFICIAL SEA WATER (ASW) ASW KCI NaCl CaC12 MgC12 HEPESbuffer NaOH chlorideCholine CsOH mM mM mM mM mM mM mM mM Normal 10 420 20 50 5 5 0 0 K-free 0 420 20 50 5 5 0 0 K and Na-free 0 0 20 50 5 0 430 3 Kand Mg-free 0 470 50 0 5 4 0 0 High Ca 0 50 250 0 5 5 20 0 Variable same as normal except part of NaCl is replaced by KCI Variable same as K-free except part of NaCl is replaced by choline chloride [Cl]a same as K and Mg-free except part of NaCl is replaced by Na propionate Variable same as high Ca except part of CaC12 is replaced by choline chloride potentials. When the internal electrode was inserted into the axon, the where R, T, and F are the universal gas constant, tempera- newly recorded differential potential was denoted V. The experimental ture (in Kelvin), and Faraday's constant, respectively; PK, value of the resting potential was taken as the difference between V and PNa, and are the relative membrane permeabilities of K, V,ff*. As a standard procedure, V0ff,, was determined again at the end of Pcl each experiment. It usually stayed within 2 mV of the initial value. Na, and Cl; (K), (Na), and (Cl) are the activities of K, Na, Because one ofthe most important factors that affect the measurement and Cl; subscript o denotes the outside of the cell, and ofa resting potential is leakage, all axons used in this study were dissected subscript i denotes the inside of the cell. In this paper, (S) carefully so that leakage was at a minimum. At the beginning of each means activity of ion S, while [SI means concentration of experiment, the resting potential had to be at least -60 mV and the = In most a magnitude of the action potential not less than 100 mV. Otherwise, the ion S. (S) ys[S]. biological studies, however, axon would be rejected. simplified form of the GHK equation often is used, i.e., The composition of the ASW is given in Table I. The control internal perfusion solution (IPS) was composed of 360 mM KF, 40 mM K- V= RT/Fln [(K), + b(Na)ol (2) phosphate, 50 mM NaF, and 200 mM sucrose. This solution is similar to (Ki+ b(Na)iJ' that used by Tasaki et al. (1965). The ASW and IPS were buffered and the pH adjusted to 7.9 and 7.3, respectively. The activity coefficients of K where b = PNa/PK. This "simplified GHK equation," and Na in the various solutions were estimated from data compiled by proposed by Hodgkin (1958), has the advantage of con- Robinson and Stokes (1959). 7K and YN. in ASW were taken as the taining only one unknown parameter, b. If the ionic average activity coefficients (-y) of KCI and NaCl, respectively, in are the ratio can be deter- solutions of the same ionic strength as the ASW, while 7K and 7N. in IPS activities known, permeability were taken as the 'y, of KF and NaF, respectively. The values I used for mined simply by measuring V. the activity coefficients were YK = 0.632 and yN. = 0.670 for the ASW; 7K - 0.676 and yN. = 0.641 for the internal solution. For the purpose of Dependence of the Cellular Potential on calculation, the activities ofNa and K inside an intact axon were assumed Concentrations of Cl to be the same as in the normal IPS. Except for those specified, the experiments were done at a temperature of 50C. To determine whether the simplified form of the GHK When the axon was'perfused with a solution that contained a different equation (Eq. 2) can be used safely, I have examined the concentration of electrolyte, the resting potential of the axon changed quickly and often reached a new, stable value within minutes. The time effects of [Cl]0 and [Cl]o on the cellular potential. It is course of the change of potential usually simulated an exponential curve. stated often in the literature that the Cl terms in Eq. 1 can The asymptote of the potential curve was chosen to be the final value of be dropped, because Cl ion distributes passively across the the resting potential. I often recorded two asymptotes in each measure- cell membrane, and hence the net Cl current is zero. This ment, one determined by a change from a high concentration to a low argument cannot be applied to the experiments with squid concentration, and another by a change from a low concentration to a high concentration.
Recommended publications
  • A Thermodynamic Description for Physiological Transmembrane Transport
    A thermodynamic description for physiological transmembrane transport Marco Arieli Herrera-Valdez 1 1 Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México marcoh@ciencias:unam:mx April 16, 2018 Abstract Physiological mechanisms for passive and active transmembrane transport have been theoretically described using many different approaches. A generic formulation for both passive and active transmem- brane transport, is derived from basic thermodynamical principles taking into account macroscopic forward and backward molecular fluxes, relative to a source compartment, respectively. Electrogenic fluxes also depend on the transmembrane potential and can be readily converted into currents. Interestingly, the conductance-based formulation for current is the linear approximation of the generic formulation for current, around the reversal potential. Also, other known formulas for current based on electrodiffusion turn out to be particular examples of the generic formulation. The applicability of the generic formulations is illustrated with models of transmembrane potential dynamics for cardiocytes and neurons. The generic formulations presented here provide a common ground for the biophysical study of physiological phenomena that depend on transmembrane transport. 1 Introduction One of the most important physiological mechanisms underlying communication within and between cells is the transport of molecules across membranes. Molecules can cross membranes either passively (Stein and Litman, 2014), or via active transport (Bennett, 1956). Passive transmembrane transport occurs through pores that may be spontaneously formed within the lipid bilayer (Blicher and Heimburg, 2013), or within transmembrane proteins called channels (Hille, 1992; Stein and Litman, 2014) that may be selective for particular ion types (Almers and McCleskey, 1984; Doyle et al., 1998; Favre et al., 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • 9.01 Introduction to Neuroscience Fall 2007
    MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 9.01 Introduction to Neuroscience Fall 2007 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 9.01 Recitation (R02) RECITATION #2: Tuesday, September 18th Review of Lectures: 3, 4 Reading: Chapters 3, 4 or Neuroscience: Exploring the Brain (3rd edition) Outline of Recitation: I. Previous Recitation: a. Questions on practice exam questions from last recitation? II. Review of Material: a. Exploiting Axoplasmic Transport b. Types of Glia c. THE RESTING MEMBRANE POTENTIAL d. THE ACTION POTENTIAL III. Practice Exam Questions IV. Questions on Pset? Exploiting Axoplasmic Transport: Maps connections of the brain Rates of transport: - slow: - fast: Examples: Uses anterograde transport: - Uses retrograde transport: - - - Types of Glia: - Microglia: - Astrocytes: - Myelinating Glia: 1 THE RESTING MEMBRANE POTENTIAL: The Cast of Chemicals: The Movement of Ions: ­ Influences by two factors: (1) Diffusion: (2) Electricity: Ohm’s Law: I = gV Ionic Equilibrium Potentials (EION): + Example: ENs * diffusional and electrical forces are equal 2 Nernst Equation: EION = 2.303 RT/zF log [ion]0/[ion]i Calculates equilibrium potential for a SINGLE ion. Inside Outside EION (at 37°C) + [K ] + [Na ] 2+ [Ca ] ­ [Cl ] *Pumps maintain concentration gradients (ex. sodium­potassium pump; calcium pump) Resting Membrane Potential (VM at rest): Measured resting membrane potential: ­ 65 mV Goldman Equation: + + + + VM = 61.54 mV log (PK[K ]o + PNa[Na ]o)/ (PK[K ]I + PNa[Na ]i) + + Calculates membrane potential when permeable to both Na and K . Remember: at REST, gK >>> gNa therefore, VM is closer to EK THE ACTION POTENTIAL (Nerve Impulse): Phases of an Action Potential: Vm (mV) ENa 0 EK Time 3 Conductance of Ion Channels during AP: Remember: Changes in conductance, or permeability of the membrane to a specific ion, changes the membrane potential.
    [Show full text]
  • Nernst Equation - Wikipedia 1 of 10
    Nernst equation - Wikipedia 1 of 10 Nernst equation In electrochemistry, the Nernst equation is an equation that relates the reduction potential of an electrochemical reaction (half-cell or full cell reaction) to the standard electrode potential, temperature, and activities (often approximated by concentrations) of the chemical species undergoing reduction and oxidation. It was named after Walther Nernst, a German physical chemist who formulated the equation.[1][2] Contents Expression Nernst potential Derivation Using Boltzmann factor Using thermodynamics (chemical potential) Relation to equilibrium Limitations Time dependence of the potential Significance to related scientific domains See also References External links Expression A quantitative relationship between cell potential and concentration of the ions Ox + z e− → Red standard thermodynamics says that the actual free energy change ΔG is related to the free o energy change under standard state ΔG by the relationship: where Qr is the reaction quotient. The cell potential E associated with the electrochemical reaction is defined as the decrease in Gibbs free energy per coulomb of charge transferred, which leads to the relationship . The constant F (the Faraday constant) is a unit conversion factor F = NAq, where NA is Avogadro's number and q is the fundamental https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nernst_equation Nernst equation - Wikipedia 2 of 10 electron charge. This immediately leads to the Nernst equation, which for an electrochemical half-cell is . For a complete electrochemical reaction
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7 Transport of Ions in Solution and Across Membranes
    Chapter 7 Transport of ions in solution and across membranes 7-1. Introduction 7-2. Ionic fluxes in solutions 7-2.1. Fluxes due to an electrical field in a solution 7-2.2. Flux due to an electrochemical potential gradient 7-3. Transmembrane potentials 7-3.1. The Nernst potential, the single ion case where the flux is zero 7-3.2. Current-voltage relationships of ionic channels 7-3.3. The constant field approximation 7-3.4. The case of a neutral particle 7-4. The resting transmembrane potential, ER 7-4.1. Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz expression for the resting potential 7-4.2. Gibbs-Donnan equilibrium and the Donnan potential 7-4.3. Electrodiffusion 7-5. Patch clamp studies of single-channel kinetics 7-6. The action potential in excitable cells 7-6.1. Neuronal currents 7-6.2. The Hodgkin-Huxley nerve action potential 7-6.3. The voltage clamp methods for measuring transmembrane currents 7-6.4. Functional behavior of the nerve axon action potential 7-6.5. Cardiac and other action potentials 7-7. Propagation of the action potential 7-7.1. The cable equations 7-7.2. The velocity of propagation 7-8. Maintaining ionic balance: Pumps and exchangers 7-9. Volume changes with ionic fluxes 7-10. Summary 7-11. Further reading 7-12. Problems 7-13. References 7-13.1. References from previous reference list not appearing in current text or references This chapter lacks the following: Tables and programs. Completion of later parts on the pumps. Complete cross referencing. Improvements in Figures.
    [Show full text]
  • Constant-Field Equation” in Membrane Ion Transport
    Milestone in Physiology JGP 100th Anniversary The enduring legacy of the “constant-field equation” in membrane ion transport Osvaldo Alvarez1 and Ramon Latorre2 1Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Santiago, Chile 2Centro Interdisciplinario de Neurociencia de Valparaíso, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile In 1943, David Goldman published a seminal paper in The Journal of General Physiology that reported a concise expression for the membrane current as a function of ion concentrations and voltage. This body of work was, and still is, the theoretical pillar used to interpret the relationship between a cell’s membrane potential and its exter- nal and/or internal ionic composition. Here, we describe from an historical perspective the theory underlying the constant-field equation and its application to membrane ion transport. 2 2 z i FV /RT ______P i ​​ ​z i ​ ​F V _____________C i ,in​​ ​e ​ − C i ,out Introduction I i = ​ ​​ , (1) RT ( e z i FV /RT​ − 1 ) The Goldman (1943) paper is, perhaps, one of the most well-known articles published in The Journal of General where Ii is the current density carried by ion i, Pi is the Physiology. Because of the great impact that this article permeability coefficient, zi the valence of ion I, V is the still has on the study of transport of ions across mem- membrane voltage, Ci,in and Ci,out are the ion concentra- branes, the JGP editorial board thought that it deserved tions in the solutions bathing either side of the mem- some discussion and comments. brane, and R, T, and F have their usual meaning.
    [Show full text]
  • 185 Since Goldman [1] Published His Paper in 1943, the Constant Field Equation Has Been Used Widely, Although the Constant Field
    .MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES 12 (1971),185-196 185 A Generalization of the Goldman Equation, Including the Effect of Electrogenic Pumps JOHN A. JACQUEZ Department of Physiology, The Medical School, and Department of Biostatistics, The School of Public Health, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan ABSTRACT An equation similar to the Goldman equation is derived for the steady-state diffusion of univalent ions across a membrane with arbitrary potential profile and in the presence of electrogenic pumps. The presence of electrogenic pumps adds a term proportional to the net pump flux to both numerator and denominator in the Goldman equation. For arbitrary potential profiles the permeabilities of the positive ions are all divided by one potential-dependent factor and the permeabilities of the negative ions are divided by another such factor. Both factors are determined by the potential function and tend to vary inversely. If the symmetric part of the potential function is zero, both factors are equal to 1.0. Hence in the general form of the Goldman equation the relative contri- butions of the positive and negative ions are weighted by factors that are easily cal- culated if the potential function is known. INTRODUCTION Since Goldman [1] published his paper in 1943, the constant field equation has been used widely, although the constant field assumption has been criticized repeatedly as being unrealistic. In his book, Cole [2] com- ments on the widespread use and the limitations of the constant field equation. Nonetheless, the constant field equation has been used for ob- taining relative permeabilities in steady states and in the transient state at the peak of the action potential [3-61, at which point net current flow across the membrane is zero.
    [Show full text]
  • Computational Neuroscience a First Course Springer Series in Bio-/Neuroinformatics
    Springer Series in Bio-/Neuroinformatics 2 Hanspeter A. Mallot Computational Neuroscience A First Course Springer Series in Bio-/Neuroinformatics Volume 2 Series Editor N. Kasabov For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/10088 Hanspeter A. Mallot Computational Neuroscience A First Course ABC Hanspeter A. Mallot Department of Biology University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany ISSN 2193-9349 ISSN 2193-9357 (electronic) ISBN 978-3-319-00860-8 ISBN 978-3-319-00861-5 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-00861-5 Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: 2013939742 c Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Permissions for use may be obtained through RightsLink at the Copyright Clearance Center. Violations are liable to prosecution under the respective Copyright Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Vm = Vin – Vout V = IR V = I/G Ix = Gx
    Bi 360 - NEUROBIOLOGY EQUATIONS NEUROBIOLOGY EQUATIONS 1. Membrane potential (Vm) Vm = Vin – Vout where Vm is the membrane potential, Vin is the potential on the inside of the cell, and Vout is the potential on the outside of the cell. 2. Ohm’s Law (and derivations) V = IR where V is voltage (measured in volts), I is current (measured in amperes or amps), and R is resistance (measured in ohms). Because conductance is the inverse of resistance (R), Ohm’s law can be rewritten as: V = I/g where g is conductance (measured in mhos or Siemens). The most frequently used derivation of Ohm’s Law in neurobiology rearranges the terms to measure current with respect to conductance and voltage: Ix = gx (Vm – Ex) Where Ix is the current flow for ion X, gx is the conductance for ion X, Vm is membrane potential, Ex is the Nernst or Equilibrium Potential for ion X, and Vm – Ex is the driving force for ion X. 3. Nernst Equation (also known as the Nernst Potential or the Equilibrium Potential) { } Ex = ln { } 푅푇 푋 표푢푡 푧퐹 푋 푖푛 where Ex is the equilibrium potential for ion X, R is the gas constant, T is temperature (degrees Kelvin), z is the valence of ion X, and [X]out and [X]in are the concentrations of ion X outside and inside the cell, respectively. 1 Bi 360 - NEUROBIOLOGY EQUATIONS Since RT/F is 25 mV at 25oC (room temperature), and the constant for converting from natural logarithm to base 10 logarithm is 2.3, the Nernst equation can be written as: { } Ex = { } 58 푚푉 푋 표푢푡 푖푛 푧 푙표푔 푋 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Lect. 2: Nervous System I - Resting Potential
    Organismal Lec 2 01/20/00 Lect. 2: Nervous System I - Resting Potential ASST.: READ CH. 5 and Ch 6 pp.163-174 I. Nervous System provided rapid communication throughout body and interaction with environment A. For rapid homeostatic control B. For conscious behavior II. Behavior is dictated by Nervous system A. Everything that is an animal’s behavior is determined by neural activity B. Basic unit is Nerve Cell 1. Pattern of connections with other nerve cells provides 2. Information processing 3. Patterns of activity for Behavior 4. Modulation of those connections Æ Modified behavior C. To understand how nervous system does all this must understand electrical properties of cells and their connections III. First some definitions A. Current (I) 1. Flow of electrical charge 2. Can be electrons (neg. current) 3. Can be positive ions (pos. current) 4. Although physicists generally refer to negative current flow, physiologists prefer to talk about positive ions 5. In analogy to flow of water through a hose, this is the water. B. Resistance (Ohms) 1. Resistance of current 2. In analogy to water, this is diameter of hose; i.e. how much hose restricts flow of water C. Voltage (V) 1. Force which drives current through a resistor 2. Force drops off as current goes through the resistor (IR drop) 3. Sometimes referred to as POTENTIAL DIFFERENCE; i.e. the potential force to Page 1 Organismal Lec 2 01/20/00 move current 4. In water analogy, this is difference in pressure between two points, can be due to difference in elevation between two points or pressure due to a pump a) Difference is low in gentle stream 5.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Membrane Potential
    Back 7 Membrane Potential John Koester Steven A. Siegelbaum INFORMATION IS CARRIED WITHIN and between neurons by electrical and chemical signals. Transient electrical signals are particularly important for carrying time-sensitive information rapidly and over long distances. These electrical signals—receptor potentials, synaptic potentials, and action potentials—are all produced by temporary changes in the current flow into and out of the cell that drive the electrical potential across the cell membrane away from its resting value. This current flow is controlled by ion channels in the cell membrane. We can distinguish two types of ion channels—resting and gated—by their distinctive roles in neuronal signaling. Resting channels normally are open and are not influenced significantly by extrinsic factors, such as the potential across the membrane. They are primarily important in maintaining the resting membrane potential, the electrical potential across the membrane in the absence of signaling. Most gated channels, in contrast, are closed when the membrane is at rest. Their probability of opening is regulated by the three factors we considered in the last chapter: changes in membrane potential, ligand binding, or membrane stretch. In this and succeeding chapters we consider how transient electrical signals are generated in the neuron. We begin by discussing how resting ion channels establish and maintain the resting potential. We also briefly describe the mechanism by which the resting potential can be perturbed, giving rise to transient electrical signals such as the action potential. In Chapter 8 we shall consider how the passive properties of neurons—their resistive and capacitive characteristics—contribute to local signaling within the neuron.
    [Show full text]
  • VO BASICS of NEUROSCIENCE 3 St Lectures from 8:15 to 10:30 A.M.; from October 1St to October 19Th, 2012
    VO BASICS OF NEUROSCIENCE 3 st Lectures from 8:15 to 10:30 a.m.; from October 1st to October 19th, 2012. The lectures take place in the large lecture room, 1st floor, Center for Brain Research, Spitalgasse 4, 1090 Vienna and will be held in English language Block 1: Developmental Neurobiology and Neuroanatomy Developmental Neurobiology 1.10. Lecture 1: Neural development in invertebrates: Specification of neural precursor cells, patterning of the nervous system, asymmetric cell division of neural stem cells, specification of neuronal identity. (Knoblich) 1.10. Lecture 2: Neurogenesis in vertebrates: brain development, the cortex as a neural stem cell model, developmental and adult neural stem cells. (Knoblich) Neuroanatomy 1.10. Lecture 3: Histology of neurons, classification of neurons, gliacells; (CNS) astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, microglia, ependymal cells; (PNS) Schwann cells (Bauer) 2.10. Lecture 4: Central nervous system (from spinal cord to neocortex), meninges, ventricles, blood supply, peripheral nervous system (Bauer) 2.10. Lecture 5: Functional systems: reflexes, the sensomotoric und autonomic nervous system, from sensory organ to basal ganglia and neocortex (Bauer) Block 2: Neuronal Cell Biology and Biochemistry Neurotransmitters, Receptors and Channels 2.10. Lecture 6: General synaptic model; Ways for a molecule to pass a membrane; ion channels: as examples: KV-and NaV-channels. (Scholze) 3.10. Lecture 7: General list of Neurotransmitters, including their biosynthesis and distribution; Excitatory vs. inhibitory neurotransmission: ionotropic vs metabotropic receptors; (Scholze) 3.10. Lecture 8: Cys-Loop-receptors; as examples: (muscular and neuronal) nACh-Receptors, GABA receptors and their ligands (benzodiazepines, barbiturates,…), glycine–receptors and their anchoring at the synapse (gephyrin), ionotropic glutamate receptors (Scholze) 3.10.
    [Show full text]
  • Transmembrane Transport[Version 2; Peer Review: 2 Approved]
    F1000Research 2018, 7:1468 Last updated: 19 MAY 2021 RESEARCH ARTICLE A thermodynamic description for physiological transmembrane transport [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] Marco Arieli Herrera-Valdez Department of Mathematics, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, CDMX, 04510, Mexico v2 First published: 14 Sep 2018, 7:1468 Open Peer Review https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16169.1 Second version: 21 Nov 2018, 7:1468 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16169.2 Reviewer Status Latest published: 19 May 2021, 7:1468 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16169.3 Invited Reviewers 1 2 Abstract A general formulation for both passive and active transmembrane version 3 transport is derived from basic thermodynamical principles. The (revision) derivation takes into account the energy required for the motion of 19 May 2021 molecules across membranes, and includes the possibility of modeling asymmetric flow. Transmembrane currents can then be version 2 described by the general model in the case of electrogenic flow. As it (revision) report is desirable in new models, it is possible to derive other well known 21 Nov 2018 expressions for transmembrane currents as particular cases of the general formulation. For instance, the conductance-based formulation version 1 for current turns out to be a linear approximation of the general 14 Sep 2018 report report formula for current. Also, under suitable assumptions, other formulas for current based on electrodiffusion, like the constant field approximation by Goldman, can also be recovered from the general 1. Kyle C.A. Wedgwood , University of formulation. The applicability of the general formulations is illustrated Exeter, Exeter, UK first with fits to existing data, and after, with models of transmembrane potential dynamics for pacemaking cardiocytes and 2.
    [Show full text]