DOCSLIB.ORG

Technical Resource Document: Extraction and Beneficiation of Ores and Minerals

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Technical Resource Document: Extraction and Beneficiation of Ores and Minerals EPA 530-R-94-011 NTIS PB94-170248 TECHNICAL RESOURCE DOCUMENT EXTRACTION AND BENEFICIATION OF ORES AND MINERALS VOLUME 1 LEAD-ZINC June 1994 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Solid Waste Special Waste Branch 401 M Street, SW Washington, DC 20460 Technical Resource Document: Lead-Zinc DISCLAIMER AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document was prepared by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The mention of company or product names is not to be considered an endorsement by the U.S. Government or the EPA. This Technical Resource Document consists of two sections. The first section is EPA's Profile of the lead-zinc industry; the remaining section is a Site Visit Report from a site visit conducted by EPA. The Profile Section was distributed for review to the U.S. Department of the Interior's Bureau of Mines, the Western Governors Association, the Interstate Mining Compact Commission, the American Mining Congress, and Public Interest Groups. Summaries of the comments and EPA's responses are presented as an appendix to the Profile Section. The Site Visit Report Section was reviewed by individual company, state, and Federal representatives who participated in the site visit. Comments and EPA responses are included as Appendices to the specific Site Visit Section. EPA is grateful to all individuals who took the time to review sections of this Technical Resource Document. The use of the terms "extraction," "beneficiation," and mineral processing" in the Profile section of this document is not intended to classify any waste streams for the purposes of regulatory interpretation or application. Rather, these terms are used in the context of common industry terminology. i Technical Resource Document: Lead-Zinc TABLE OF CONTENTS Page DISCLAIMER AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................. i 1.0 MINING INDUSTRY PROFILE: LEAD-ZINC ................................................ 1-1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................ 1-1 1.2 ECONOMIC CHARACTERIZATION OF THE INDUSTRY ......................... 1-2 1.2.1 Lead .............................................................. 1-2 1.2.2 Zinc .............................................................. 1-11 1.3 ORE CHARACTERIZATION ................................................. 1-12 1.4 LEAD-ZINC EXTRACTION AND BENEFICIATION PRACTICES .................. 1-13 1.4.1 Extraction Methods ................................................. 1-13 1.4.2 Beneficiation Methods ............................................... 1-14 1.4.2.1 Milling ................................................... 1-14 1.4.2.2 Flotation ................................................. 1-15 1.4.2.3 Roasting and Sintering of Concentrates ......................... 1-23 1.5 EXTRACTION AND BENEFICIATION WASTES ASSOCIATED WITH LEAD-ZINC MINES .................................................................... 1-24 1.5.1 Extraction and Beneficiation Wastes ................................... 1-25 1.5.1.1 Overburden and Mine Development Rock ....................... 1-25 1.5.1.2 Mine Water ............................................... 1-25 1.5.1.3 Flotation Wastes ........................................... 1-28 1.5.2 Waste Management ................................................. 1-28 1.5.2.1 Waste Rock Piles ........................................... 1-28 1.5.2.2 Mine Pits and Underground Workings .......................... 1-29 1.5.2.3 Tailings Impoundments ...................................... 1-29 1.5.2.4 Leachate .................................................. 1-30 1.6 ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ............................................... 1-30 1.6.1 Ground Water/Surface Water ......................................... 1-30 1.6.2 Soil .............................................................. 1-31 1.6.3 Air ............................................................... 1-31 1.6.4 Damage Cases ..................................................... 1-32 1.6.4.1 National Priorities List Sites .................................. 1-32 1.6.4.2 Clean Water Act Section 304(l) Sites ........................... 1-32 1.6.4.3 Other Reported Damage Cases ................................ 1-33 1.7 CURRENT REGULATORY AND STATUTORY FRAMEWORK ................... 1-36 1.7.1 Environmental Protection Agency Regulations ............................ 1-37 1.7.1.1 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ....................... 1-37 1.7.1.2 Clean Water Act ........................................... 1-38 1.7.1.3 Clean Air Act ............................................. 1-41 1.7.2 Department of the Interior ............................................ 1-42 1.7.2.1 Bureau of Land Management ................................. 1-42 1.7.2.2 National Park Service ....................................... 1-44 1.7.2.3 Fish and Wildlife Service .................................... 1-44 1.7.3 Department of Agriculture ............................................ 1-45 1.7.3.1 Forest Service ............................................. 1-45 1.7.4 State Programs ..................................................... 1-46 1.7.4.1 Alaska ................................................... 1-46 1.7.4.2 Missouri .................................................. 1-47 ii Technical Resource Document: Lead-Zinc 1.8 REFERENCES ............................................................. 1-49 2.0 SITE VISIT REPORT: DOE RUN FLETCHER ............................................... 2-1 2.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................ 2-1 2.1.1 Background ........................................................ 2-1 2.1.2 General Description .................................................. 2-2 2.1.3 Environmental Setting ................................................ 2-5 2.1.3.1 Climate ................................................... 2-6 2.1.3.2 Geology ................................................... 2-6 2.1.3.3 Hydrology ................................................. 2-8 2.2 FACILITY OPERATION ...................................................... 2-9 2.2.1 Mining Operations .................................................. 2-10 2.2.2 Mill Operation ..................................................... 2-13 2.2.2.1 Grinding ................................................. 2-15 2.2.2.2 Flotation ................................................. 2-17 2.2.2.3 Filtration ................................................. 2-19 2.2.2.4 Process Control ............................................ 2-19 2.3 WASTE MANAGEMENT .................................................... 2-22 2.3.1 Types of Waste ..................................................... 2-22 2.3.2 Tailings ........................................................... 2-24 2.3.3 Mine Water ........................................................ 2-28 2.3.4 Other Wastes ...................................................... 2-28 2.4 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AND COMPLIANCE. ......................... 2-29 2.4.1 State of Missouri ................................................... 2-29 2.4.1.1 Water Permit .............................................. 2-29 2.4.1.2 Metallic Minerals Waste Management .......................... 2-33 2.4.1.3 Dam Safety ............................................... 2-33 2.4.1.4 Other State Regulations ..................................... 2-33 2.4.2 Federal Regulations ................................................. 2-34 2.5 REFERENCES ............................................................. 2-35 APPENDICES APPENDIX 1-A SPECIFIC FLOTATION ACTIVITIES EMPLOYED FOR POLYMETALLIC ORES AND ASSOCIATED PROCESS FLOW SHEETS .................................................... 1-54 APPENDIX 1-B NPL SITE SUMMARIES RELATED TO LEAD AND ZINC EXTRACTION AND BENEFICIATION ................................ 1-60 APPENDIX 1-C SUMMARY OF COMMENTS AND EPA RESPONSES ................... 1-72 APPENDIX 1-D ACRONYMS ...................................................... 1-75 APPENDIX 2-A THE DOE RUN COMPANY'S COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SITE VISIT REPORT, AND EPA'S RESPONSES ......................... 2-36 APPENDIX 2-B THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT'S COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SITE VISIT REPORT, AND EPA'S RESPONSES ............. 2-40 iii Technical Resource Document: Lead-Zinc APPENDIX 2-C THE FOREST SERVICE'S COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SITE VISIT REPORT, AND EPA'S RESPONSES .............................. 2-42 iv Technical Resource Document: Lead-Zinc LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1-1. Characteristics of Lead and Zinc Mines ......................................... 1-3 Table 1-2. United States Consumption of Lead, By Product (In Metric Tons) .................... 1-9 Table 1-3. Waste to Product Ratios, Crude Ore to Product Ratios, and Material Handled to Product Ratios For Lead and Zinc, 1987 ....................................... 1-13 Table 1-4. Commonly Used Reagents in Lead and Zinc Flotation ............................ 1-16 Table 1-5. Range of Constituents of Waste Water and Raw Mine Waters Loads From Five Selected Lead-Zinc Mines ................................................... 1-26 Table 1-6. Missouri Mining Waste Damage Cases ........................................ 1-34 Table 1-7. Balaklala Mine Typical Metal Concentrations of Discharge ........................ 1-36 Table 1-8. Keystone Mine Typical Metal Concentrations of Discharge ........................ 1-36 Table 1-9. BPT and BAT Standards Ore Mining and Dressing Point Source Category (milligrams per liter) ......................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Development of the Periodic Table and Its Consequences Citation: J
    Firenze University Press www.fupress.com/substantia The Development of the Periodic Table and its Consequences Citation: J. Emsley (2019) The Devel- opment of the Periodic Table and its Consequences. Substantia 3(2) Suppl. 5: 15-27. doi: 10.13128/Substantia-297 John Emsley Copyright: © 2019 J. Emsley. This is Alameda Lodge, 23a Alameda Road, Ampthill, MK45 2LA, UK an open access, peer-reviewed article E-mail: [email protected] published by Firenze University Press (http://www.fupress.com/substantia) and distributed under the terms of the Abstract. Chemistry is fortunate among the sciences in having an icon that is instant- Creative Commons Attribution License, ly recognisable around the world: the periodic table. The United Nations has deemed which permits unrestricted use, distri- 2019 to be the International Year of the Periodic Table, in commemoration of the 150th bution, and reproduction in any medi- anniversary of the first paper in which it appeared. That had been written by a Russian um, provided the original author and chemist, Dmitri Mendeleev, and was published in May 1869. Since then, there have source are credited. been many versions of the table, but one format has come to be the most widely used Data Availability Statement: All rel- and is to be seen everywhere. The route to this preferred form of the table makes an evant data are within the paper and its interesting story. Supporting Information files. Keywords. Periodic table, Mendeleev, Newlands, Deming, Seaborg. Competing Interests: The Author(s) declare(s) no conflict of interest. INTRODUCTION There are hundreds of periodic tables but the one that is widely repro- duced has the approval of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) and is shown in Fig.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Lead in Your Home Portrait Color
    Protect Your Family From Lead in Your Home United States Environmental Protection Agency United States Consumer Product Safety Commission United States Department of Housing and Urban Development March 2021 Are You Planning to Buy or Rent a Home Built Before 1978? Did you know that many homes built before 1978 have lead-based paint? Lead from paint, chips, and dust can pose serious health hazards. Read this entire brochure to learn: • How lead gets into the body • How lead afects health • What you can do to protect your family • Where to go for more information Before renting or buying a pre-1978 home or apartment, federal law requires: • Sellers must disclose known information on lead-based paint or lead- based paint hazards before selling a house. • Real estate sales contracts must include a specifc warning statement about lead-based paint. Buyers have up to 10 days to check for lead. • Landlords must disclose known information on lead-based paint or lead-based paint hazards before leases take efect. Leases must include a specifc warning statement about lead-based paint. If undertaking renovations, repairs, or painting (RRP) projects in your pre-1978 home or apartment: • Read EPA’s pamphlet, The Lead-Safe Certifed Guide to Renovate Right, to learn about the lead-safe work practices that contractors are required to follow when working in your home (see page 12). Simple Steps to Protect Your Family from Lead Hazards If you think your home has lead-based paint: • Don’t try to remove lead-based paint yourself. • Always keep painted surfaces in good condition to minimize deterioration.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Tailings1
    A HISTORY OF MINERAL CONCENTRATION: A HISTORY OF TAILINGS1 by Timothy c. Richmond2 Abstract: The extraction of mineral values from the earth for beneficial use has been a human activity- since long before recorded history. Methodologies were little changed until the late 19th century. The nearly simultaneous developments of a method to produce steel of a uniform carbon content and the means to generate electrical power gave man the ability to process huge volumes of ores of ever decreasing purity. The tailings or waste products of mineral processing were traditionally discharged into adjacent streams, lakes, the sea or in piles on dry land. Their confinement apparently began in the early 20th century as a means for possible future mineral recovery, for the recycling of water in arid regions and/or in response to growing concerns for water pollution control. Additional Key Words: Mineral Beneficiation " ... for since Nature usually creates metals in an impure state, mixed with earth, stones, and solidified juices, it is necessary to separate most of these impurities from the ores as far as can be, and therefore I will now describe the methods by which the ores are sorted, broken with hammers, burnt, crushed with stamps, ground into powder, sifted, washed ..•. " Agricola, 1550 Introduction identifying mining wastes. It is frequently used mistakenly The term "tailings" is to identify all mineral wastes often misapplied when including the piles of waste rock located at the mouth of 1Presented at the 1.991. National mine shafts and adi ts, over- American. Society for Surface burden materials removed in Mining and Reclamation Meeting surface mining, wastes from in Durango, co, May 1.4-17, 1.991 concentrating activities and sometimes the wastes from 2Timothy c.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Periodic Table
    of the Periodic Table teacher notes Give your students a visual introduction to the families of the periodic table! This product includes eight mini- posters, one for each of the element families on the main group of the periodic table: Alkali Metals, Alkaline Earth Metals, Boron/Aluminum Group (Icosagens), Carbon Group (Crystallogens), Nitrogen Group (Pnictogens), Oxygen Group (Chalcogens), Halogens, and Noble Gases. The mini-posters give overview information about the family as well as a visual of where on the periodic table the family is located and a diagram of an atom of that family highlighting the number of valence electrons. Also included is the student packet, which is broken into the eight families and asks for specific information that students will find on the mini-posters. The students are also directed to color each family with a specific color on the blank graphic organizer at the end of their packet and they go to the fantastic interactive table at www.periodictable.com to learn even more about the elements in each family. Furthermore, there is a section for students to conduct their own research on the element of hydrogen, which does not belong to a family. When I use this activity, I print two of each mini-poster in color (pages 8 through 15 of this file), laminate them, and lay them on a big table. I have students work in partners to read about each family, one at a time, and complete that section of the student packet (pages 16 through 21 of this file). When they finish, they bring the mini-poster back to the table for another group to use.
    [Show full text]
  • Smelting Iron from Laterite: Technical Possibility Or Ethnographic Aberration?
    Smelting Iron from Laterite: Technical Possibility or Ethnographic Aberration? T. O. PRYCE AND S. NATAPINTU introduction Laterites deposits (orlateriticsoilsastheyarealsocalled)arefrequently reported in Southeast Asia, and are ethnographically attested to have been used for the smelting of iron in the region (Abendanon 1917 in Bronson 1992:73; Bronson and Charoenwongsa 1986), as well as in Africa (Gordon and Killick 1993; Miller and Van Der Merwe 1994). The present authors do not dispute this evidence; we merely wish to counsel cautioninitsextrapolation.Modifyingour understanding of a population’s potential to locally produce their own iron has immediate ramifications for how we reconstruct ancient metal distribution net- works, and the social exchanges that have facilitated them since iron’s generally agreed appearance in Southeast Asian archaeological contexts during the mid-first millennium b.c. (e.g., Bellwood 2007:268; Higham 1989:190). We present this paper as a wholly constructive critique of what appears to be a prevailingperspectiveonpre-modernSoutheastAsianironmetallurgy.Wehave tried to avoid technical language and jargon wherever possible, as our aim is to motivate scholars working within the regiontogivefurtherconsiderationtoiron as a metal, as a technology, and as a socially significant medium (e.g., Appadurai 1998; Binsbergen 2005; Gosden and Marshall 1999). When writing a critique it is of course necessary to cite researchers with whom one disagrees, and we have done this with full acknowledgment that in modern archaeology no one person can encompass the entire knowledge spectrum of the discipline.1 The archaeome- tallurgy of iron is probably on the periphery of most of our colleagues’ interests, but sometimes, within the technical, lies the pivotal, and in sharing some of our insights we hope to illuminate issues of benefit to all researchers in Metal Age Southeast Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 11 Applications of Ore Microscopy in Mineral Technology
    CHAPTER 11 APPLICATIONS OF ORE MICROSCOPY IN MINERAL TECHNOLOGY 11.1 INTRODUCTION The extraction of specific valuable minerals from their naturally occurring ores is variously termed "ore dressing," "mineral dressing," and "mineral beneficiation." For most metalliferous ores produced by mining operations, this extraction process is an important intermediatestep in the transformation of natural ore to pure metal. Although a few mined ores contain sufficient metal concentrations to require no beneficiation (e.g., some iron ores), most contain relatively small amounts of the valuable metal, from perhaps a few percent in the case ofbase metals to a few parts per million in the case ofpre­ cious metals. As Chapters 7, 9, and 10ofthis book have amply illustrated, the minerals containing valuable metals are commonly intergrown with eco­ nomically unimportant (gangue) minerals on a microscopic scale. It is important to note that the grain size of the ore and associated gangue minerals can also have a dramatic, and sometimes even limiting, effect on ore beneficiation. Figure 11.1 illustrates two rich base-metal ores, only one of which (11.1b) has been profitably extracted and processed. The McArthur River Deposit (Figure I 1.1 a) is large (>200 million tons) and rich (>9% Zn), but it contains much ore that is so fine grained that conventional processing cannot effectively separate the ore and gangue minerals. Consequently, the deposit remains unmined until some other technology is available that would make processing profitable. In contrast, the Ruttan Mine sample (Fig. 11.1 b), which has undergone metamorphism, is relativelycoarsegrained and is easily and economically separated into high-quality concentrates.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury and Lead Pollution: Still a Critical Issue in Europe
    06 December 2007 Mercury and Lead Pollution: still a Critical Issue in Europe Human activities release heavy metals into the atmosphere where they are also transported across national boundaries. This results in air, soil and water pollution through the deposition of heavy metals in environments that are located far away from the actual emission sources. Atmospheric deposition of mercury and lead in particular are calculated to be too high, affecting respectively 51.2% and 7.4% of EU-25 ecosystems respectively in 2000. Heavy metals such as cadmium, lead and mercury can result in serious health risks (e.g. lung damage, kidney diseases, nervous system failures, etc.) and can be harmful to the environment (e.g. soil and water pollution, accumulation in plants). In 1979, the European Union (EU) signed the Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution Convention (LRTAP1), which was the first international legally binding instrument dealing with problems of air pollution on a broad regional basis, including pollution due to heavy metals emissions. In Europe, research programs focusing on heavy metals are already in place, including the EU-funded project ESPREME 2, which aims at developing methods and identifying strategies to support EU environmental policy-making for reducing the emissions and thus the harmful impacts of heavy metals. In the framework of the LRTAP, a methodology 3 was developed to assess the critical loads of heavy metals for both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, as well as for human health. The critical load is a measure of how much metal input from anthropogenic sources a system can tolerate. It is the threshold below which significant harmful effects on human health and on the environment do not occur, according to present knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • ITP Mining: Energy and Environmental Profile of the U.S. Mining Industry: Chapter 4: Iron
    Energy and Environmental Profile of the U.S. Mining Industry 4 Iron The chemical element iron is the fourth most common element in the Earth's crust and the second most abundant metal. About five percent of the Earth's crust is composed of iron. The metal is chemically active and is found in nature combined with other elements in rocks and soils. In its natural state, iron is chemically bonded with oxygen, water, carbon dioxide, or sulfur in a variety of minerals. Forms of Iron Minerals, Ores, and Rocks Iron occurs mainly in iron-oxide ores. Some ores are a mixture of minerals rich in iron. Other iron ores are less rich and have a large number of impurities. The most important iron ore- forming minerals are: • Magnetite - Magnetite (Fe3O4) forms magnetic black iron ore. There are large deposits of magnetite in Russia and Sweden. • Hematite - Hematite (Fe2O3) is a red iron ore. Hematite occurs in almost all forms, from solid rock to loose earth. It is the most plentiful iron ore and occurs in large quantities throughout the world. • Goethite - Goethite (Fe2O3.H2O), a brown ore, contains iron. • Limonite - Limonite (Fe2O3.H2O) is a yellow-brown iron ore. Limonite is a collective term for impure goethite and a mixture of hydrated iron oxides. Iron 4-1 Energy and Environmental Profile of the U.S. Mining Industry Taconite contains low-grade iron in fine specks and bands. It is an extremely hard and flinty - containing about 25 - 30 percent iron. The iron in taconite occurs principally as magnetite and hematite and finely dispersed with silica in sedimentary deposits.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Related Topics on the Periodic Tables of Elements
    Three related topics on the periodic tables of elements Yoshiteru Maeno*, Kouichi Hagino, and Takehiko Ishiguro Department oｆ physics, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan * [email protected] (The Foundations of Chemistry: received 30 May 2020; accepted 31 July 2020) Abstaract: A large variety of periodic tables of the chemical elements have been proposed. It was Mendeleev who proposed a periodic table based on the extensive periodic law and predicted a number of unknown elements at that time. The periodic table currently used worldwide is of a long form pioneered by Werner in 1905. As the first topic, we describe the work of Pfeiffer (1920), who refined Werner’s work and rearranged the rare-earth elements in a separate table below the main table for convenience. Today’s widely used periodic table essentially inherits Pfeiffer’s arrangements. Although long-form tables more precisely represent electron orbitals around a nucleus, they lose some of the features of Mendeleev’s short-form table to express similarities of chemical properties of elements when forming compounds. As the second topic, we compare various three-dimensional helical periodic tables that resolve some of the shortcomings of the long-form periodic tables in this respect. In particular, we explain how the 3D periodic table “Elementouch” (Maeno 2001), which combines the s- and p-blocks into one tube, can recover features of Mendeleev’s periodic law. Finally we introduce a topic on the recently proposed nuclear periodic table based on the proton magic numbers (Hagino and Maeno 2020). Here, the nuclear shell structure leads to a new arrangement of the elements with the proton magic-number nuclei treated like noble-gas atoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery of Silver, Gold, and Lead from a Complex Sulfide Ore Using Ferric Chloride, Thiourea, and Brine Leach Solutions
    PLEASE DO NOT REI10VE FROM LIBRARY iRIi9022 i Bureau of M ines Report of Investigations/1986 Recovery of Silver, Gold, and Lead From a Complex Sulfide Ore Using Ferric Chloride, Thiourea, and Brine Leach Solutions By R. G. Sandberg and J. L. Huiatt UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Report of Investigations 9022 Recovery of Silver, Gold, and Lead From a Complex Sulfide Ore Using Ferric Chloride, Thiourea, and Brine Leach Solutions By R. G. Sandberg and J. L. Huiatt UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Donald Paul Hodel. Secretary BUREAU OF MINES Robert C. Horton. Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publicatiori Data: Sandberg, R. G. (Richard G.) Recovery of silver, gold, and lead from a complex sulfide ore using ferric chloride, rhiourea, and brine leach solurions. (Repon of invesrigarions / Unired Srares Deparrmenr of rhe Inrerior, Bureau of Mines; 9022) Bibliography: p. 14. Supr. of Docs. no.: I 28.23: 9022. 1. Silver-Merallurgy. 2. Gold-Merallurgy. 3. Lead-Merallurgy. 4. Leaching. 5. Ferric chloride. 6. Salr. I. Huiarl, J. L. II. Tide. III. Series: Repon of invesrigarions (Unired Srares. Bureau of Mines) ; 9022. TN23.U43 [TN770] 6228 (669'.231 1\6-600056 CONTENTS Abstract............................................................................................................... 1 Introduction. .......................................................................................................... 2 Materials.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. ...... .. .. .. .. • .. .. .. .• .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .
    [Show full text]
  • Nickel Laterite Smelting Processes and Some Examples of Recent Possible Modifications to the Conventional Route
    metals Review Nickel Laterite Smelting Processes and Some Examples of Recent Possible Modifications to the Conventional Route Ender Keskinkilic Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Atilim University, 06830 Ankara, Turkey; [email protected]; Tel.: +90-533-302-9510 Received: 16 July 2019; Accepted: 1 September 2019; Published: 3 September 2019 Abstract: The treatment of laterites has been a research hotspot in extractive metallurgy over the past decades. Industrially, the pyrometallurgical treatment of laterites is mostly accomplished with a well-established method, namely, the rotary kiln–electric arc furnace (RKEF) process, which includes three main operations—calcination, prereduction, and smelting—followed by further refining for the removal of impurities from the raw ferro-nickel. As indicated in many studies of the RKEF process, the major downside of this method is its high energy consumption. Efforts have been made to lower this consumption. Furthermore, several new processes have been proposed. Among these, low-grade ferro-nickel production is regarded as the most widely and industrially used process after traditional RKEF operation. Although not widespread, other alternative processes of industrial scale have been generated since the start of the millennium. Recently, certain innovative processes have been tested either in the laboratory or at pilot-scale. In this paper, a literature review related to the smelting of laterites is made, and an emphasis on new processes and some examples of new developments in the RKEF process are presented. Keywords: laterite; smelting; RKEF process; low-grade ferro-nickel 1. Introduction According to a review published by Diaz et al., oxide-type nickel ores accounted for 64% of land-based nickel ores, but more than 60% of nickel production was based on the matte smelting of sulfide ores in 1988 [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Nature No. 2468, Vol
    FEBRUARY IS, 1917J NATURE LETTERS TO THE EDITOR. and in Paris, several of them fam l-us for their atomic- weight determinations, doubt has lingered with r-egard [The Editor does not hold himself responsible for to our results for the very much more difficult case of opinions expressed by his correspondents. Neither thorium lead. In the first place, no one but myself can he undertake to return, or to correspond with has been able to obtain a suitable material by which the writers of, rejected manuscripts intended for to test the question, and I, of course, can claim no this or any other part of NATURE. No notice is previous experience of atomic-weight work. In the taken of anonymous communications.] second place, there has been an unfortunate confusion The Atomic Weight of "Thorium" Lead. between my material, Ceylon thorite, and thorianite, IN continuation of preliminary work published by a totally distinct mixed thorium and uranium Ceylon Mr. H. Hyman and myself (Trans. Chern. Soc., 1914, mineral. Lastly, there has been the widespread view, due :v., 1402) I gave an account in NATURE, February 4, to Holmes and Lawson, Fajans, and others, mainly 1915, p. 615, of the preparation of 80 grams of lead derived from geological evidence, that thorium-E, the from Ceylon thorite and of the determination of its isotope of lead resulting from the ultimate change of density in comparison with that of ordinary lead, thorium, was not sufficiently stable to accumulate over which proved the thorite lead to be 0'26 per cent. geological periods of time.
    [Show full text]