View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Epsilon Open Archive This is an author produced version of a paper published in FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS. This paper has been peer-reviewed and is proof-corrected, but does not include the journal pagination. Citation for the published paper: Nordström, E-M, Eriksson, L. O. & Öhman, K. (2010) Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis in participatory forest planning : experience from a case study in northern Sweden. Forest Policy and Economics. Volume: 12 Number: 8, pp 562-574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2010.07.006 Access to the published version may require journal subscription. Published with permission from: Elsevier Epsilon Open Archive http://epsilon.slu.se Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis in participatory forest planning: Experience from a case study in northern Sweden Eva-Maria Nordströma, *, Ljusk Ola Erikssona, Karin Öhmana a Department of Forest Resource Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 901 83 Umeå, Sweden * Corresponding author. Tel.: +46 90 786 8258; fax: +46 90 778 116. E-mail address:
[email protected] (Eva-Maria Nordström) 1 Abstract Forest planning in a participatory context often involves multiple stakeholders with conflicting interests. A promising approach for handling these complex situations is to integrate participatory planning and multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA). The objective of this paper is to analyze strengths and weaknesses of such an integrated approach, focusing on how the use of MCDA has influenced the participatory process. The paper outlines a model for a participatory MCDA process with five steps: stakeholder analysis, structuring of the decision problem, generation of alternatives, elicitation of preferences, and ranking of alternatives.