DOCSLIB.ORG

D7.6 Main Conclusions of the Regional (Or National Or

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
D7.6 Main Conclusions of the Regional (Or National Or MinLand: Mineral resources in sustainable land-use planning A H2020 ProjectH2020 Grant Agreement: GA 776679 Deliverable: D7.6 “Main conclusions of the Regional (or National or Local) Workshops” Authors: Ch. Panagiotopoulou1, M. Taxiarchou2, Sybil Berne2, MacCabe Durney Barnes2, Alicja Kot- Niewiadomska3, Sara Louise Gottenhuber4, Gerald Berger4, Katharina Gugerell5, Michael Tost5 , Ronald Arvidsson6, Peter Åkerhammar6, Nike Luodes7, Agnes Raaness8, Joacim Jacobsson9, Magnus Langendoen9, Anders Forsgren10, Christian Marasmi11, Virginia Rodríguez Gómez12, Julio César Arranz González12, Francisco Javier Fernández Naranjo 12, José Vitor Lisboa13, Jorge Cavalho13, Maria João Figueira14, Paula Dinis14, Augusto Filipe13, Kyriaki Hatzilazaridou15, Foteini Halkiopoulou15, Katerina Adam1 1National Technical University of Athens (NTUA) 2 Geological Survey of Ireland (GSI) 3Mineral and Energy Economy Research Intitute Polish Academy of Science 4Vienna University of Economics and Business (WU) 5Montanuniversität Leoben (MUL) 6Geological Survey of Sweden 7Finnish Geological Survey 8Norwegian Geological Survey 9County Adminsitrative Board of Sweden 10Boliden 11 Emilia-Romagna Region, Soil and Coast protection and Land Reclamation Servie 12Geological Survey of Spain (IGME SP) 13 Geological Survey of Portugal (LNEG) 14 Direcção Geral de Energia e Geologia (DGEG) 15Geological Survey of Greece (IGME GR) Published: January 2019 Updated: 1 This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 www.minland.eu research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement No 776679 Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 5 1. Local Workshop in Ireland .................................................................................................. 6 1.1 Preparations for the Local Workshop ............................................................................. 6 1.1.1 Topics selected for Local Workshop Discussion ....................................................... 6 1.1.2 Local Workshop Design ............................................................................................ 6 1.1.3 Invitation .................................................................................................................. 7 1.2 Local Workshop ............................................................................................................... 9 1.2.1 Workshop programme ............................................................................................. 9 1.2.2 Presentation summaries........................................................................................... 9 1.2.3 Round Tables .......................................................................................................... 13 1.3 Workshop Conclusions .................................................................................................. 17 1.3.1 Audience statistics .................................................................................................. 17 1.3.2 Conclusions ............................................................................................................. 19 2. Local workshop in Poland ................................................................................................. 20 2.1 Preparations for the Local Workshop ........................................................................... 20 2.1.1 Topics selected for Local Workshop Discussion ..................................................... 20 2.1.2 Local Workshop Design .......................................................................................... 20 2.1.3 Invitation ................................................................................................................ 21 2.2 Local Workshop ............................................................................................................. 22 2.2.1 Workshop program ................................................................................................ 22 2.2.2 Presentation summaries......................................................................................... 22 2.2.3 Round Tables .......................................................................................................... 23 2.2.4 Photos of the event ................................................................................................ 25 2.3 Workshop Conclusions .................................................................................................. 27 2.3.1 Audience statistics .................................................................................................. 27 2.3.2 Conclusions ............................................................................................................. 27 3. Local Workshop in Austria ................................................................................................ 30 3.1 Preparations for the Local Workshop ........................................................................... 30 3.1.1 Topics selected for Local Workshop Discussion ..................................................... 30 3.1.2 Local Workshop Design .......................................................................................... 31 3.1.3 Invitation ................................................................................................................ 32 3.2 Local Workshop ............................................................................................................. 35 2 This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 www.minland.eu research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement No 776679 3.2.1 Workshop program ................................................................................................ 35 3.2.2 Presentation summaries......................................................................................... 37 3.2.3 Round Tables .......................................................................................................... 40 3.3 Workshop Conclusions .................................................................................................. 45 3.3.1 Audience statistics .................................................................................................. 45 3.3.2 Conclusions ............................................................................................................. 45 4. Scandinavian Workshop ....................................................................................................... 47 4.1 Preparations for the Local Workshop ........................................................................... 47 4.1.1 Topics selected for Local Workshop Discussion ..................................................... 47 4.1.2 Local Workshop Design .......................................................................................... 49 4.1.3 Invitation ................................................................................................................ 49 4.2 Local Workshop ............................................................................................................. 50 4.2.1 Workshop programme ........................................................................................... 50 4.2.2 Presentation summaries......................................................................................... 52 4.2.3 Round Tables .......................................................................................................... 52 4.3 Workshop ...................................................................................................................... 57 4.3.1 Audience statistics .................................................................................................. 57 4.3.2 Conclusions ............................................................................................................. 57 5. Local Workshop at Emilia Romagna Region .......................................................................... 58 5.1 Preparation for the Local Workshop ............................................................................. 58 5.1.1 Topics selected for Local Workshop Discussion ..................................................... 58 5.1.2 Local Workshop Design .......................................................................................... 58 5.1.3 Invitation ................................................................................................................ 59 5.2 Local Workshop ............................................................................................................. 59 5.2.1 Workshop program ................................................................................................ 59 5.2.2 Presentation summaries......................................................................................... 60 5.2.3 Round Tables .......................................................................................................... 60 5.2.4 Photos of the event ................................................................................................ 61 5.3 Workshop Conclusions .................................................................................................. 62 5.3.1 Audience statistics .................................................................................................. 62 5.3.2 Conclusions ............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Feasibility Study for Siting of a Deep Repository Within the Mala Municipality
    SE9800008 TECHNICAL REPORT 96-22 Feasibility study for siting of a deep repository within the Mala municipality Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co March 1996 SVENSK KARNBRANSLEHANTERING AB SWEDISH NUCLEAR FUEL AND WASTE MANAGEMENT CO P.O.BOX 5864 S-102 40 STOCKHOLM SWEDEN PHONE +46 8 665 28 00 FAX+46 8 661 57 19 FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR SITING OF A DEEP REPOSITORY WITHIN THE MALA MUNICIPALITY March 1996 -08 Key words: Deep repository, site selection, feasibility study, Mala FOREWORD This report presents the results of the feasibility study in Mala, summarizing a broad investigative effort undertaken to shed light on the prospects for siting a deep repository in the municipality of Mala, and what consequences this would have for the individual, the community and the environment. SKB's overall evaluation is that the municipality of Mala could provide good pros- pects for a deep repository. We would like to mention two factors in particular as arguments in support of this conclusion; the bedrock and the local mining tradition. The bedrock is decisive in determining the feasibility of achieving safe disposal, and there are large areas in Mala Municipality where we judge the bedrock conditions to be good. We cannot determine, however, whether a particular site is definitely suitable from the feasibility study - that will require direct investigations on the site. The mining industry, with all its peripheral activities, has through the years made Mala a centre of knowledge on geoscience and underground rock excavation. We are familiar with the value of this knowledge because specialists from Mala - geologists, geophysicists, diamond drillers and others - have participated in SKB's development activities since the start in the 1970s.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources in Sustainable Land-Use Planning
    MinLand: Mineral resources in sustainable land-use planning This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement No 776679 www.minland.eu Topic: SC5-15d - Linking land use planning policies to national mineral policies Deliverable: D3.2 Case studies summary 1 2 3 Authors: Luodes Nike M. , Arvidsson Ronald and WP3 task 3.2 Working Group 1GTK Geological Survey Of Finland, Finland (WP3 Lead – Case studies of land use planning in exploration and mining, Task 3.2 Lead) 2 SGU Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning, Sweden (Project Coordinator) 3 Division of Mineral Policy Poland MEERI Pas, Laboratorio Nacional de Energia E Geologia I.P. LNEG, Portugal Geological Survey of Norway, NGU, Norway Montanuniversitat Leoben, MUL, Austria Minpol Gmbh, Austria Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, WU, Austria Department of Communications, Climate Action And Environment, GSI, Ireland Maccabe Durney Barnes Ltd Mdb, Ireland Polska Academia Nauk Instytut Gospodarki Surowcami Mineralnymi I Energia, PAS, Poland Direcao-Geral De Energia e Geologia DGEG, Portugal Instituto Geológico y Minero de España IGME Sp, Spain Länsstyrelsen Västerbotten LV, Sweden Boliden Mineral Ab, Sweden Regione Emilia Romagna Rer, Italy Institouto Geologikon Kai Metalleftikon Erevnon Igme Gr, Greece Geological And Geophysical Institute of Hungary (Mfgi), Hungary Nederlandse Organisatie Voor Toegepast Natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek Tno Internally Published: July 2018 Submitted November 2018 Update: January 2019 This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 www.minland.eu research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement No 776679 Table of Contents MinLand: Mineral resources in sustainable land-use planning .................................................... 1 Deliverable: D3.2 Case studies summary .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Organizational Role Stress
    Organizational Role Stress: A Case Study in the Swedish Public Sector Authors: Jimmy Fredin Robert Nordin Supervisor: Vladimir Vanyushyn Student Umeå School of Business and Economics Spring semester 2015 Degree project, 30 hp ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! I Abstract!! Work-related stress among employees in Sweden is reported to increase, women are experiencing higher levels of stress than their male colleagues. Organizational Role Stress is a denomination for all stress related to an individuals role in an organization and the annual cost for Organizational Role Stress in the European Union exceeds € 20 billion. Managers in Lycksele municipality emphasized a troublesome working situation where time is not enough to balance administrative responsibilities and operative leadership. Hence, the aim to investigate: “How does Organizational Role Stress affect the balance between administrative responsibilities and operative leadership among managers in Lycksele municipality?” Four key words were deduced from the research question: Organizational Role Stress, Administrative Management, Public Sector Leadership and Public Sector, which guided the search for existing theories to help substantiate and answer the research question. The study introduced the Organizational Role Stress Framework developed by Udai Pareek into a Swedish pubic organization with the aim to measure the impact of Organizational Role Stress. The Organizational Role Stress Framework contributed to a quantitative study among managers in Lycksele municipality to measure the impact of Organizational Role Stress. The sample population consisted of 60 managers who were given an equal opportunity to participate in the study. In total, 49 out of 60 managers participated in the study, which corresponds to a satisfying response rate of 82 %. The main conclusion of the study is that Organizational Role Stress has a negative impact on managers’ ability to balance administrative responsibilities and operative leadership.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Impact Assessment in Finland, Norway and Sweden: a Descriptive and Comparative Study
    KTH Architecture and the Built Environment Social impact assessment in Finland, Norway and Sweden: a descriptive and comparative study Jonas Svensson Degree Project SoM EX 2011-30 Degree Program in Civil Engineering and Urban Management Stockholm 2011 KTH, Royal Institute of Technology Department of Urban Planning and Environment Division of Urban and Regional Studies ABSTRACT is thesis describes and compares the practices of social impact assessments in Finland, Norway and Sweden. How are social impacts, as caused by any planned intervention, assessed in the countries? How do the countries' practices relate to the international theory and practice? What are the differences, and/or similarities, between the countries? SIA is a procedure of assessing and estimating potential social impacts as caused by some kind of planned intervention. e origin of SIA is commonly traced back to the introduction of environmental impact assessment (EIA). However, it has not won the same recognition as its cousin EIA. Since social aspects often are complex and thus difficult to measure and estimate, SIA can be used as a procedure to not only cope with quantitative aspects but also qualitative. Since EIA was introduced into legislation in Europe through the European Council, the Nordic countries have gradually introduced EIA, and impact assessment (IA), in their national legislation. ere has not been any introduction of SIA per se in the legislation, however, assessment of social impacts are more or less included in the legislation covering EIA and IA. is thesis shows that SIA, in practice, is used to a differing extent in the countries and that there are some differences in what social impacts comprises and how they are assessed.
    [Show full text]
  • Suopajärvi Et Al. 2019. SOCIAL LICENSE to OPERATE in THE
    Manuscript Details Manuscript number JRPO_2018_525_R2 Title SOCIAL LICENSE TO OPERATE IN THE FRAME OF SOCIAL CAPITAL Exploring local acceptance of mining in two rural municipalities in the European North Article type Full Length Article Abstract The social license to operate (SLO) is today an important part of the strategies of global mining companies. This article illustrates how social capital influences the SLO in two Northern European municipalities, Storuman (Sweden) and Sodankylä (Finland), where several mineral exploration and mining projects have been in progress in recent years. Based on two surveys on social structure, relations, shared norms, and trust applying the social capital approach, the comparative study focuses on linkages between social capital and the SLO in Storuman and Sodankylä. The findings of the study show that the local acceptance of mining is very high in Sodankylä, whereas the residents of Storuman are clearly more critical. The respondents in Storuman had trouble evaluating the performance of the companies operating in the region. In our view, the SLO is built on good company performance, but only to some extent, as the local context, for example the social structure of the community and the history of mining operations in the locality, also plays an important role. Furthermore, positive effects at the local level are important in gaining the SLO. An interesting result of the Sodankylä case was that the respondents trusted the companies more than was suggested by their evaluations of the companies’ information sharing performance and the residents’ participation opportunities. They also placed high value on the local benefits of mining, such as improved public and private services, better employment opportunities, and the increased viability of the community in general.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis in Participatory Forest Planning : Experience from a Case Study in Northern Sweden
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Epsilon Open Archive This is an author produced version of a paper published in FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS. This paper has been peer-reviewed and is proof-corrected, but does not include the journal pagination. Citation for the published paper: Nordström, E-M, Eriksson, L. O. & Öhman, K. (2010) Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis in participatory forest planning : experience from a case study in northern Sweden. Forest Policy and Economics. Volume: 12 Number: 8, pp 562-574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2010.07.006 Access to the published version may require journal subscription. Published with permission from: Elsevier Epsilon Open Archive http://epsilon.slu.se Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis in participatory forest planning: Experience from a case study in northern Sweden Eva-Maria Nordströma, *, Ljusk Ola Erikssona, Karin Öhmana a Department of Forest Resource Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 901 83 Umeå, Sweden * Corresponding author. Tel.: +46 90 786 8258; fax: +46 90 778 116. E-mail address: [email protected] (Eva-Maria Nordström) 1 Abstract Forest planning in a participatory context often involves multiple stakeholders with conflicting interests. A promising approach for handling these complex situations is to integrate participatory planning and multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA). The objective of this paper is to analyze strengths and weaknesses of such an integrated approach, focusing on how the use of MCDA has influenced the participatory process. The paper outlines a model for a participatory MCDA process with five steps: stakeholder analysis, structuring of the decision problem, generation of alternatives, elicitation of preferences, and ranking of alternatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Linear Explanation
    BEYOND LINEAR EXPLANATION A theoretical study of definitions, concepts and discourses about the Sami people’s cultural heritage in Sweden Ezequiel Pinto-Guillaume ___________________________________________________________________________ Institutionen för kultur och estetik vid Stockholms universitet Masterprogram i kulturarvsstudier VT 2015 ABSTRACT Institution: Institutionen för kultur och estetik vid Stockholms universitet, Kulturarvsstudier Adress: 106 91 Stockholms universitet Tel: 08-16 20 00 vx Handledare: Christina Fredengren Titel och undertitel: Beyond linear explanation – A theoretical study of definitions, concepts and discourses about the Sami people’s cultural heritage in Sweden Författare: Ezequiel Pinto-Guillaume Adress: Krögarvägen 105 Postadress: 14552 NORSBORG Tel: 010-7228435 Typ av uppsats: kandidatuppsats magisteruppsats X masteruppsats licentiatuppsats doktorsavhandling Ventileringstermin: VT2015 The Sami people of Northern Europe live in a cultural region (Sápmi), which stretches across the northern parts of Norway, Sweden, Finland and Russia. An authorized heritage discourse in these countries interpret Sami cultural heritage from a Westernized point-of- view. Higher cultural institutions use today definitions which are based on a prevailing authorized heritage discourse, while others avoid or feel no need to use the term “cultural heritage”. Some Sami institutions have recently begun to use definitions of cultural heritage that agree with a Westernized point-of-view. However, there are a few published definitions
    [Show full text]
  • Sammanfattning-Projekt-E12-Atlantica
    E12 Atlantica Transport The project is based on cross-border cooperation between partners in Finland, Sweden and Norway along the E12, focusing on development of a functional multi-modal transport route for goods and passengers, joint strategies for cross-border planning and future cooperation structures. WORK PACKAGES PURPOSE 1. A FUNCTIONAL TRANSPORT ROUTE To reduce border barriers and Identify possibilities to further opti- continue the development of mize and develop east-west transport the E12 that runs from Finland solutions through Sweden and further on to Norway and the Atlantic 2. CROSS-BORDER STRATEGIES coast. Further develop structures for cross- border planning and traffic strategies To create favorable conditions for strengthening the corridor’s 3. FUTURE COOPERATION STRUCTURES attractiveness and develop- Identify, analyze and present cooperation ment possibilities. A more structures designed to strengthen the developed cooperation with conditions for joint cross-border visions. trade and industry is formal- Increase collaboration in the region, ized, which creates better as well as with adjoining understanding of the trade and transport corridors industry’s transport demands. To strengthen cooperation Timetable: January 2016 – May 2018 between Kvarken Council, Budget Finland / Sweden: 2 197 500 EUR MidtSkandia and Blå Vägen, EU-support: 1 318 500 EUR as well as their partners. (60 % of budget Finland / Sweden) Budget Norway: 381 691 EUR IR-support: 190 846 EUR Total project budget: 2 579 191 EUR FOR MORE INFORMATION AND
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Västerbotten Promoting Equal Standards of Living for Inland Municipalities Through Digital Technologies, Sweden
    Resituating the Local in Cohesion and Territorial Development Case Study Report Digital Västerbotten Promoting Equal Standards of Living for Inland Municipalities through Digital Technologies, Sweden Authors: Linnea Löfving, Gustaf Norlén, and Timothy Heleniak Report Information Title: Case Study Report: Digital Västerbotten. Promoting Equal Standards of Living for Inland Municipalities through Digital Technologies, Sweden (RELOCAL Deliverable 6.2) Authors: Linnea Löfving, Gustaf Norlén, and Timothy Heleniak Version: 2 Date of Publication: 29.03.2019 Dissemination level: Public Project Information Project Acronym RELOCAL Project Full title: Resituating the Local in Cohesion and Territorial Development Grant Agreement: 727097 Project Duration: 48 months Project coordinator: UEF Bibliographic Information Löfving L, Norlén G and Heleniak T (2019) Digital Västerbotten. Promoting Equal Standards of Living for Inland Municipalities through Digital Technologies, Sweden. RELOCAL Case Study N° 29/33. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland. Information may be quoted provided the source is stated accurately and clearly. Reproduction for own/internal use is permitted. This paper can be downloaded from our website: https://relocal.eu i Table of Contents List of Figures .................................................................................................................. iii List of Maps ...................................................................................................................... iii List of Tables ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Who Owns Our Forests? Forest Ownership in the ECE Region Who Owns Our Forests? Forest Ownership in the ECE Region
    Who owns our forests? Forest ownership in the ECE region Who owns our forests? Forest ownership in the ECE region COPYRIGHT AND DISCLAIMER Copyright© 2020 United Nations and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. All rights reserved worldwide. The publication of submissions from member States in this study does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) or the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) or the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries as may be referred to in any of the submissions. Party submissions may contain data, opinions and statements from various information sources. The UNECE or FAO do not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any data, opinion, statement or other information provided in any of the submissions. This work is co-published by UNECE and FAO. ABSTRACT This study examines forest ownership in the ECE region. Based on data on 35 countries, and the first to include all forest ownership categories, this study investigates the changing nature and patterns of forest ownership, the ways in which governance and social structures influence forest owners and users, as well as forest management. Within the limits of data availability and harmonization, the publication provides an overview of, and a new baseline for, understanding the diversity and dynamics of forest ownership in the ECE region. ECE/TIM/SP/43/Rev.1 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION eISBN 978-92-1-004828-6 ISSN 1020-2269 eISSN 2518-6450 United Nations publication issued by the Economic Commission for Europe (ECE) ii Foreword FOREWORD BY UNECE AND FAO Considering the critical role of forests in housing biodiversity, providing a source of livelihood for millions of people in our region, and combating catastrophic consequences of climate change, there is an important question that merits attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Acityforyouths
    e n c o e u n A C I T Y F O R Y O U T H S c a a t g n i e c v e a t e an urban strategy to encourage and enhance existing activity and activate social space Julia Abbevik Master thesis, Spring 2020 Year 5 - Studio 13 Words 6541 Course 5AR522 Tutors Sara Thor Amalia Katopodis Tom Dobson Andrew Belfield Contents Chapter 1 Youths and moving patterns 3 1.1 Definitions 3 1.2 Point of departure & aim 3 1.3 Moving patterns - the importance of youths 5 1.4 Thesis questions 7 1.5 Methodology 7 1.5.1 Literature studies 7 1.5.2 Action based research 8 Chapter 2 Built environment and identity 9 2.1 Choosing where to live 9 2.2 Place as a part of our identity 11 2.3 Values in designing for youths 14 Chapter 3 Perspectives from Lycksele 16 3.1 The city from the perspective of youths 16 3.2 Return to Lycksele 20 3.3 Common themes 21 Chapter 4 Urban strategies and creativity 22 4.1 Tried strategies 22 4.2 Creativity as a platform 25 Chapter 5 Proposal - an urban strategy 29 Chapter 6 Conclusion 33 Bibliography 36 2 CHAPTER 1 Leaving home 1.1 Definitions Youth The period between childhood and adult age1 Referred in this report as age 13-19 Young adult A person in their teens or early twenties2 Referred in this report as age 20-26 1.2 Point of departure & aim Previous semester I looked into how depopulating areas fit within a growing economy and if there are examples of how architecture has been a valuable tool to support these places.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2011 Contents 2011 in Brief
    Annual Report 2011 Contents 2011 in brief The year in brief 1 Sales and EBITDA Pahtavaara, per quarter CEO’s Comments 2 TSEK TSEK 120,000 40,000 Business concept, Objectives and Strategy 4 The Market 6 100,000 35,000 Operations 9 Environmental Activities 16 80,000 30,000 Five-Year Overview 17 60,000 25,000 Corporate Governance Report 18 The Lappland Goldminers’ Share 40,000 20,000 and Ownership 22 20,000 15,000 Administration Report 25 Financial Statements 30 0 10,000 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 Notes 40 Audit Report 60 Sales EBITDA Board of Directors and Auditor 61 Management 62 Gold production and EBITDA Pahtavaara, per quarter Lappland Goldminers and its subsidiaries 63 Kg TSEK Words and Expressions 65 200 40,000 Definitions of Key Ratios 66 160 34,000 Annual General Meeting 120 28,000 The Annual General Meeting of Lappland Goldminers AB (publ.) will be held at 5.30 p.m. on Thursday, 24 May 2012, in the Per- rongen room, Spårvagnshallarna, Birger Jarlsgatan 57A, Stockholm. 80 22,000 Shareholders wishing to participate must: l be registered in the shareholder register maintained by 40 16,000 Euroclear Sweden AB as of Friday, 18 May 2012; l notify Lappland Goldminers AB of their intention to participate 0 10,000 by no later than 4.00 p.m. on Monday, 21 May 2012, by post Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 (Storgatan 36, SE-921 31 Lycksele, Sweden), by fax Production EBITDA (+46)-950-275 29), by telephone (+46)-950-275 00) or by e-mail ([email protected]).
    [Show full text]