The Tigris-Euphrates River Basin: Mediating a Path Towards Regional Water Stability Ali Akanda, Sarah Freeman, and Maria Placht

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Tigris-Euphrates River Basin: Mediating a Path Towards Regional Water Stability Ali Akanda, Sarah Freeman, and Maria Placht The Fletcher School Journal for issues related to Southwest Asia and Islamic Civilization Spring 2007 The Tigris-Euphrates River Basin: Mediating a Path Towards Regional Water Stability Ali Akanda, Sarah Freeman, and Maria Placht Since the 1960s, Turkey, Syria, and Iraq initiation of a process that would lead to equitable have been engaged in development works along utilization of the waters. In this context, equitable the Euphrates River, including water reservoirs, does not mean equal use, rather that, “a large agricultural works, and hydropower variety of factors, including population, constructions. The largest effort to date is geography and the availability of alternative Turkey’s South-Eastern Anatolia Project, or resources and so on, can be considered in the 3 Güneydogu Anadolu Projesi (GAP), which once allocation of water rights.” This paper proposes completed, may divert up to 30 percent of the 1 that a team of external mediators can provide the average annual water flow of the Euphrates. necessary trigger to initiate trilateral discussions, Syria also plans to divert a significant amount of including those that examine the possible trades water for agricultural development in the between water, energy, and food. Euphrates Valley. The estimated percentages of water projected to be necessary for each country’s BACKGROUND development work are: Iraq 65 percent, Turkey 52 2 The longest river in the Middle East, the percent, and Syria 32 percent. These figures add Euphrates originates in the eastern highlands of up to an impossible 149 percent demand for the Turkey, between Lake Van and the Black Sea, and total Euphrates waters. It is clear that, in the near travels a distance of 2,700 kilometers before future, water demands of the riparians (those flowing into the Persian Gulf. Some 40 percent of nations through which the river passes) will the river lies within Turkey, while the rest is surpass the amount of water supplied by the divided among the two downstream riparian Euphrates. countries, 25 percent in Syria and 35 percent in While disputes over water allocation are Iraq. The Euphrates produces a mean annual likely to worsen in the future, tensions have flow of approximately 30 billion cubic meters already increased between the three countries. A (bcm) at its entrance to Syria, which rises to number of crises have occurred in the Euphrates around 32 bcm at the Syrian- River basin due to lack of communication, Iraqi border after gaining the Twice, in 1975 and conflicting approaches, unilateral development, inputs from two Syrian and inefficient water management practices. tributaries, the Balikh and the 1998, war has been Twice, in 1975 and 1998, war has been narrowly Khabur. narrowly averted only averted only by external mediation, and the The flow in the situation is so politically tense that the countries Euphrates is highly seasonal. by external mediation, involved cannot even participate in trilateral talks The stream flow variations and the situation is so about water use. There have been a few efforts to naturally prevent utilization share data and discuss issues bilaterally, yet the of the river’s full water politically tense that countries continue to pursue their uncoordinated potential. Unfortunately, the the countries involved development projects. seasonal distribution of the A successful resolution of this conflict would availability of water does not cannot even participate enable a stable water relationship between coincide with the irrigation in trilateral talks about Turkey, Syria, and Iraq. This requires opening the requirements of the basin. In water use channels of communication between the three an average year, the river leaders over their water allocations, and the © The Fletcher School – Al Nakhlah – Tufts University 160 Packard Avenue – Medford, MA 02155-7082 USA – Tel: +1.617.627.3700 2 Al Nakhlah reaches its peak flow in April and May as the contributed significantly to the termination of winter mountain precipitation melts. The typical these meetings. low water season occurs from July to December, The Arab countries have long accused reaching its lowest point in August and Turkey of violating international water laws with September when water is most needed to irrigate regards to the Euphrates River. Iraq and Syria 4 the region’s winter crops. The average monthly consider the river to be an international hydrograph of the Euphrates shows a variation watercourse which should be treated as an between 33 percent and 275 percent of the annual integrated entity by all the riparian users. average, evidence of the extent of its seasonal However, a significant legal barrier is that Ankara 5 regards the Euphrates as a transboundary river, fluctuations. which is under Turkey's exclusive sovereignty Centuries of water use along these rivers until it flows across the border. According to have given rise to the Mesopotamian culture, Turkey, the Euphrates becomes an international cities, and peoples. To date, remains of ancient river only after it joins the Tigris in lower Iraq to irrigation networks can be found in the desert form the Shatt al-Arab, which then serves as the plains of Syria and Iraq, many of which are still in border between Iraq and Iran until it reaches the use. For centuries, Iraqis and Syrians have used Persian Gulf. Furthermore, Turkey is the only the Euphrates and the Tigris for drinking water as country in the Euphrates basin to have voted well as irrigation, and thus claim to have against the United Nations Convention on the Law of “acquired” rights to uninhibited use of the river, Non-navigational Uses of International Watercourses. regardless of the changed hydro-political scenario According to Turkey, if signed, the law would upstream. give "a veto right" to the lower riparians over Turkey’s development plans. Consequently, BARRIERS TO COOPERATION Turkey maintains that the Convention does not 6 The countries bordering the Tigris and apply to them and is thus not legally binding. Euphrates face technical, legal, and regional Increasing regional tensions are an additional barriers to successful cooperation. In the Tigris- barrier to cooperation between the riparian Euphrates basin, data regarding stream flow, countries. Since the 1960s, the three riparian precipitation, evapotranspiration, water countries of the Euphrates have had diversions, return flow, salinity, soil type, and disagreements, of varying degrees of severity, other variables in relation to land resources, are over sharing the river. As the population of the very scarce, incomplete, and disputed at many region steadily increases, the quest for locations. Moreover, agricultural and food self-sufficiency has led to As the largest water crucial information greater demands and in turn, supply-driven water resources development relating to water and land projects have increased. Turkey constructed the resources of the region is first major dam of the basin, commissioning the project in the region, not exchanged on a Keban Dam in 1973, with Syria soon following GAP has caused regular basis among the suit with the Tabqa Dam in 1975. The filling of riparians. A variety of these dams caused a sharp decrease in considerable anxiety to different figures downstream flow, causing Iraq and Syria to Turkey’s downstream concerning availability of exchange mutually hostile accusations and come irrigable land and soil 7 dangerously close to a military confrontation. neighbors, Syria and water requirements in As regional water demand steadily each riparian country are Iraq, who fear that the increased, the riparian countries pursued their available depending on individual water infrastructure plans without any project will lead to the origin of data and meaningful consultation with each other. In 1977, inclination of the experts. reduced river flows and Turkey announced plans for the region’s biggest In 1983, Turkey, Iraq, and water development project ever, the GAP, which leave little water for Syria established the Joint included a massive design of 22 dams and 19 Technical Committee to use in their countries’ hydropower projects. GAP is intended to provide resolve such data irrigation, hydropower, and socio-economic agricultural and energy disputes. However, this development. The project area encompasses group disintegrated after projects southeastern Turkey, around the headlands of the 1993 without having Euphrates and the Tigris rivers, and covers almost made much headway. 10 percent of Turkey’s total population and The uncertain political setting, pursuit of short- surface area. The project is designed to harness term national interests, lack of regularized the vast, untapped water potential of eastern institutions, and incomplete information Turkey. Its area includes about 42 percent of the © The Fletcher School – Al Nakhlah – Tufts University Spring 2007 3 total Tigris-Euphrates watershed within Turkey’s attainable in the face of rapidly expanding 8 boundary. populations. Both the agricultural and energy As the largest water resources development sectors have felt the effects of the dramatic project in the region, GAP has caused increase in requirements needed to fulfill each considerable anxiety to Turkey’s downstream nation’s self-sufficiency quota. neighbors, Syria and Iraq, who fear that the project will lead to reduced river flows and leave (i) Food security little water for use in their countries’ agricultural Syria, Iraq and Turkey have all shifted from and energy projects. One of the early projects of being net exporters of grain to net importers, yet GAP, the construction and filling of the Ataturk Syria and Iraq have even less ability to produce Dam, has been widely portrayed in the Arab sufficient quantities of food staples. Despite its media as a belligerent act. The hydro-political comparative food security, Turkey’s goal for GAP nature of GAP threatens regional stability, and is to turn its southeastern region into a 11 will continue to do so if there is no agreement or breadbasket. For both of the lower riparians, understanding regarding its impacts. Meanwhile, Turkey’s water intensive development threatens Syria is carrying out its irrigation development their irrigation-based agricultural potential.
Recommended publications
  • Soli Pompeiopolis Sütunlu Caddesi'nde Bulunan Doğu
    SEFAD, 2019; (42): 245-274 e-ISSN: 2458-908X DOI Number: https://doi.org/10.21497/sefad.675220 Soli Pompeiopolis Sütunlu Caddesi’nde Bulunan Doğu Sigillatası D Grubu Seramikleri∗ Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Volkan Yıldız Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi, Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Arkeoloji Bölümü [email protected] Öz Bu çalışmada, Kilikya Bölgesi’nin önemli liman kentlerinden biri olan Soli Pompeiopolis’te 1999 ile 2018 yılları arasında Sütunlu Cadde’de gerçekleştirilen kazılar sonucunda bulunan Geç Hellenistik ve Roma Erken İmparatorluk Dönemi kırmızı astarlı seramik gruplarından olan Doğu Sigillata D grubu değerlendirilmiştir. Soli Pompeiopolis Doğu Sigillata D grubu seramikleri Kilikya Bölgesi’ndeki kazılar arasında şimdiye kadar bulunan en zengin Doğu Sigillata D grubunu oluşturmaktadır. Bu kadar zengin bir buluntu grubu beraberinde 14 farklı formdan oluşan geniş bir form repertuvarının oluşmasını sağlamıştır. Soli Pompeiopolis Doğu Sigillata D grubu seramiklerinin form repertuvarının oluşturulmasında, Doğu Sigillata D’lerin sofra kapları ya da bir başka ifadeyle yiyecek ve içecek servisinde kullanılan lüks servis kapları olarak bilinmesi de önemli bir çıkış noktası olmuştur. Bu sınıflandırmaya göre tabaklar, kaseler ve kraterler ana grupları oluşturmaktadır. Soli Pompeiopolis Sütunlu Caddesi’nde bulunan Doğu Sigillata D’ler MÖ 1. yüzyılın ikinci yarısı ile MS 1. yüzyılın sonu arasına tarihlenmektedir. Kentte bu grubun en yoğun görüldüğü tarih ise MS 1. yüzyıldır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Kilikya, Soli Pompeiopolis, Kıbrıs, Kıbrıs Sigillataları, Doğu Sigillata D. Eastern Sigillata D Group Pottery from the Colonnaded Street of Soli Pompeiopolis Abstract In this research, I studied Eastern Sigillata D finds, one of the red slip ware groups of the Late Hellenistic and the Early Imperial Roman periods which were found during the excavations carried out between 1999 and 2018 in the Colonnaded Street of Soli Pompeiopolis, one of the important port cities of the Cilicia Region.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperation on Turkey's Transboundary Waters
    Cooperation on Turkey's transboundary waters Aysegül Kibaroglu Axel Klaphake Annika Kramer Waltina Scheumann Alexander Carius Status Report commissioned by the German Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety F+E Project No. 903 19 226 Oktober 2005 Imprint Authors: Aysegül Kibaroglu Axel Klaphake Annika Kramer Waltina Scheumann Alexander Carius Project management: Adelphi Research gGmbH Caspar-Theyß-Straße 14a D – 14193 Berlin Phone: +49-30-8900068-0 Fax: +49-30-8900068-10 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.adelphi-research.de Publisher: The German Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety D – 11055 Berlin Phone: +49-01888-305-0 Fax: +49-01888-305 20 44 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.bmu.de © Adelphi Research gGmbH and the German Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, 2005 Cooperation on Turkey's transboundary waters i Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 1.1 Motive and main objectives ........................................................................................1 1.2 Structure of this report................................................................................................3 2 STRATEGIC ROLE OF WATER RESOURCES FOR THE TURKISH ECONOMY..........5 2.1 Climate and water resources......................................................................................5 2.2 Infrastructure development.........................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • New Data on the Distribution and Conservation Status of the Two Endemic Scrapers in the Turkish Mediterranean Sea Drainages (Teleostei: Cyprinidae)
    International Journal of Zoology and Animal Biology ISSN: 2639-216X New Data on the Distribution and Conservation Status of the Two Endemic Scrapers in the Turkish Mediterranean Sea Drainages (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) Kaya C1*, Kucuk F2 and Turan D1 Research Article 1 Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Turkey Volume 2 Issue 6 2Isparta University of Applied Sciences, Turkey Received Date: October 31, 2019 Published Date: November 13, 2019 *Corresponding author: Cuneyt Kaya, Faculty of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, DOI: 10.23880/izab-16000185 Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, 53100 Rize, Turkey, Tel: +904642233385; Email: [email protected] Abstract In the scope of this study, exact distribution of the two endemic Capoeta species in the Turkish Mediterranean Sea drainages was presented. Fishes were caught with pulsed DC electro-fishing equipment from 28 sampling sites throughout Turkish Mediterranean Sea drainages between Göksu River and stream Boğa. The findings of the study demonstrate that Capoeta antalyensis inhabits in Köprüçay and Aksu rivers, and streams Boğa and Gündoğdu, all around Antalya. Capoeta caelestis widely distributed in coastal stream and rivers between Stream Dim (Alanya) in the west and Göksu River (Silifke) in the east. Metric and meristic characters were collected from the fish samples which obtained in the field for Capoeta caelestis and Capoeta antalyensis, and museum material for Capoeta damascina. In this way, morphologic features of the species revealed and Capoeta caelestis compared with Capoeta damascina to remove the hesitations about the validity of the species. The conservation status of Capoeta antalyensis was recommended to uplist from Vulnerable to Endangered. Keywords: Freshwater Fish Species; Anatolia; Pisces; Capoeta antalyensis; C.
    [Show full text]
  • 545 Distribution of Lessepsian Migrant and Non-Native Freshwater Fish
    Acta Aquatica Turcica E-ISSN: 2651-5474 16(4), 545-557 (2020) DOI: https://doi.org/10.22392/actaquatr.742217 Distribution of Lessepsian Migrant and Non-Native Freshwater Fish Species in Mediterranean Brackish Waters of Turkey Deniz İNNAL* Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Arts and Sciences Faculty, Biology Department, 15100, Burdur, Turkey *Corresponding author: [email protected] Research Article Received 24 May 2020; Accepted 24 July 2019; Release date 01 December 2020. How to Cite: İnnal, D. (2020). Distribution of lessepsian migrant and non-native freshwater fish species in Mediterranean brackish waters of Turkey. Acta Aquatica Turcica, 16(4), 545-557. https://doi.org/10.22392/actaquatr.742217 Abstract The introduction of invasive fish species is considered to be one of the major causes of species endangerment in aquatic ecosystems. More than 30 non-native freshwater fish species which are introduced for the different purpose were reported in Turkey. In addition to the freshwater non-native fish species, the brackish water systems are also affected by the fish species that enter the Mediterranean Sea through the Suez Canal. This study aimed to identify non-native fish species introduced in the Mediterranean brackish water systems of Turkey. Thirteen non-native species from eleven families were identified from 15 localities along the entire Mediterranean Coast of Turkey between 2014-2017. These species are Carassius gibelio (Bloch, 1782), Pseudorasbora parva (Temminck & Schlegel, 1846), Coptodon zillii (Gervais, 1848), Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758), Gambusia holbrooki Girard, 1859, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum, 1792), Chelon carinatus (Valenciennes 1836), Equulites klunzingeri (Steindachner, 1898), Upeneus moluccensis (Bleeker, 1855), Upeneus pori Ben-Tuvia & Golani, 1989, Siganus rivulatus Forsskål & Niebuhr, 1775, Sillago suezensis Golani, Fricke & Tikochinski, 2013 and Sphyraena chrysotaenia Klunzinger, 1884.
    [Show full text]
  • The Route of Paul's First Journey to Pisidian Antioch
    New Test. Stud. , pp. –. Printed in the United Kingdom © Cambridge University Press doi:10.1017/S002868850999004X The Route of Paul’s First Journey to Pisidian Antioch MARK WILSON University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa email: [email protected] The route of Paul’s first journey between Perga and Pisidian Antioch is still dis- puted. This article examines the three alternatives proposed by scholars. It explores the geographical and historical evidence for each route, looking especially at the extensive road system that existed in Pamphylia, Pisidia, and south Galatia in the first century. Bible atlases routinely depict one route and the reasons for this choice are discussed. Based on a review of the evidence, a fresh hypothesis for the route of the first journey is suggested. Keywords: Paul’s first journey, Perga, Pisidian Antioch, Via Sebaste, Roman roads, Acts .; . Introduction The routes that the apostle Paul took on his journeys across Asia Minor still remain in dispute. A case in point is the route of Paul’s first journey from Perga (Πέργη) to Pisidian Antioch. Scholars have suggested three possible routes with variations for this journey. Two of these routes are routinely depicted in Bible atlases, often with little awareness of the ancient road network or the topo- graphy of the area. On a popular level, the recent opening of the St Paul Trail in southern Turkey has also stirred up interest in the route of Paul’s first journey. Although the St Paul Trail does not follow the ancient routes exactly, Kate Clow’s experience in preparing the new path has provided fresh insights into the region’s history and topography.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydro-Politics of the Tigris and Euphrates Basins
    Engineering, 2016, 8, 140-172 Published Online March 2016 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/eng http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/eng.2016.83015 Hydro-Politics of the Tigris and Euphrates Basins Nadhir Al-Ansari Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden Received 1 March 2016; accepted 25 March 2016; published 28 March 2016 Copyright © 2016 by author and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract The supply of fresh water is essential to life, socioeconomic development, and political stability in Middle East. Turkey, Syria and Iraq are the main riparian countries in the Tigris-Euphrates basin. Turkey is the riparian hegemon for a long time due to its structural power and dominant river po- sition. Iraq and Syria are the lower countries in the basin and for this reason they always like to ensure the quantity of water required to satisfy their requirements. The conflict between riparian countries is due to several factors. These are: population growth rate and food security, energy security, economic and technological development, political fragmentation, international water laws, water and management availability and public awareness. There have been a number of at- tempts to find a common ground on water issues between the main three riparian countries since 1920 but no agreement signed yet. Present situation is very bad in Syria and Iraq where thousands of people have no access to water and farmers are leaving their land because of draught. Such sit- uation will definitely raise tension and might lead to war.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Fishes of Turkey: a Revised and Updated Annotated Checklist
    BIHAREAN BIOLOGIST 9 (2): 141-157 ©Biharean Biologist, Oradea, Romania, 2015 Article No.: 151306 http://biozoojournals.ro/bihbiol/index.html Freshwater fishes of Turkey: a revised and updated annotated checklist Erdoğan ÇIÇEK1,*, Sevil Sungur BIRECIKLIGIL1 and Ronald FRICKE2 1. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi, Faculty of Art and Sciences, Department of Biology, 50300, Nevşehir, Turkey. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 2. Im Ramstal 76, 97922 Lauda-Königshofen, Germany, and Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde, Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany. E-Mail: [email protected] *Corresponding author, E. Çiçek, E-mail: [email protected] Received: 24. August 2015 / Accepted: 16. October 2015 / Available online: 20. November 2015 / Printed: December 2015 Abstract. The current status of the inland waters ichthyofauna of Turkey is revised, and an updated checklist of the freshwater fishes is presented. A total of 368 fish species live in the inland waters of Turkey. Among these, 3 species are globally extinct, 5 species are extinct in Turkey, 28 species are non-native and 153 species are considered as endemic to Turkey. We recognise pronounced species richness and a high degree of endemism of the Turkish ichthyofauna (41.58%). Orders with the largest numbers of species in the ichthyofauna of Turkey are the Cypriniformes 247 species), Perciformes (43 species), Salmoniformes (21 species), Cyprinodontiformes (15 species), Siluriformes (10 species), Acipenseriformes (8 species) and Clupeiformes (8 species). At the family level, the Cyprinidae has the greatest number of species (188 species; 51.1% of the total species), followed by the Nemacheilidae (39), Salmonidae (21 species), Cobitidae (20 species), Gobiidae (18 species) and Cyprinodontidea (14 species).
    [Show full text]
  • History, Culture, Nature in Antalya and the Western Mediterranean
    History, Culture, Nature in Antalya and the Western Mediterranean “As a result of a series of excursions to ancient cities in the Pamphylian plains within a few hours’ ride from Adalia, I was astonished to find out that there existed numerous ancient monuments, mostly dating to the Late Imperial period, either on which nothing has been written and researched or which have not received the attention they deserve, extending over a few miles. Nevertheless, its landscape, more beautiful than all the places I have known, had captured me the most.” Karl Graf von Lanckoronski Städte Pamphyliens und Pisidiens, 1890 Olympos Çavuşçu Çavuşçu Dam Dam Antiocheia Antiocheia Yalvaç Yalvaç Lake Lake Işıklı Işıklı Adıgüzel Adıgüzel Contents Barajı Barajı Ertokuş Han Ertokuş Han Gelendost Gelendost Uluborlu Uluborlu Mount Gelincik Mount Gelincik Senirkent SenirkentNature Park Nature Park D330 D330 Şarkikaraağaç Şarkikaraağaç History (Page 6) Dinar Dinar Barla Barla Traces of the Past Lake Lake Eğirdir Eğirdir Lycia Gönen AtabeyGönen Atabey Pamphylia Keçiborlu Keçiborlu D695 D695 D330 D330 Pisidia Konya Konya Eğirdir Eğirdir Middle Ages D330 D330 Acıgöl Acıgöl D650 D650 Aksu Aksu Republican Era Denizli Denizli Lake Lake Isparta Isparta Beyşehir Beyşehir Gölcük Gölcük Davraz Ski Davraz Ski Lake Lake Nature Park Nature Park Center Center D695 D695 Burdur Burdur Yenişarbademli Yenişarbademli Lake Lake Gölcük Gölcük Culture (Page 42) Burdur Burdur Akdağ Akdağ Beyşehir Beyşehir Akgöl Akgöl Sagalassos Sagalassos D715 D715 D650 D650 Culture in the Taurus Lake Lake
    [Show full text]
  • The Growth Rate of Eel in the River Asi, Turkey
    Electronic Journal of Ichthyology October, 2006 2: 55-64 GROWTH OF EUROPEAN EEL IN A TURKISH RIVER AT THE SOUTH-EASTERN LIMIT OF ITS DISTRIBUTION Şükran. YALÇIN-ÖZDİLEK*, Aysun. GÜMÜŞ†, Willem. DEKKER** *Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Education Faculty, Anafartalar Campus, 17100 Çanakkale, Turkey. †19 Mayıs University, Faculty of Science and Letters, Biology Department, 55139 Kurupelit Samsun, Turkey. **Netherlands Institute for Fisheries Research PO Box 68, 1970 AB Ijmuiden, the Netherlands Corresponding Author: Dr. Şükran Yalçın-Özdilek Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Education Faculty, Anafartalar Campus, 17100 Çanakkale Turkey Tel. 90 286 217 13 03, Fax. 90 286 212 07 51, Email: [email protected] Abstract: European eel, Anguilla anguilla L., has a wide distribution from polar to arid climates. The growth and sex in eels from the River Asi, which is in the most arid region of the species distribution, and at a temperature of 21-27 ºC close to the experimentally determined optimum for the eel were examined. A total of 315 European eels were collected between January 1997 –May 1998 and April 2003. Growth was fast, with a high asymptotic length. Temperature is the main factor driving to growth; apparently, growth does not cease during the hot, arid summer. Since these fastest growing stocks will be of major significance for overall dynamics of the whole population, further studies of these southern eels will be required. Key words: Anguilla anguilla, Asi River, European eel, growth, temperature, Turkey Introduction Asi is close to the optimum for eel growth European eel, Anguilla anguilla L., is (Seymour 1984), but no field studies have distributed in Northern and Western Europe, been published to corroborate the and along all the coast of the Mediterranean temperature relation.
    [Show full text]
  • Endemic Freshwater Fishes of Turkey
    FishTaxa (2018) 3(4): 1-39 E-ISSN: 2458-942X Journal homepage: www.fishtaxa.com © 2018 FISHTAXA. All rights reserved Endemic freshwater fishes of Turkey Erdoğan ÇIÇEK*,1, Ronald FRICKE2, Sevil SUNGUR3, Soheil EAGDERI4 1Department of Biology, Faculty of Art and Sciences, Nevşehir Hacı BektaşVeli University, 50300, Nevşehir, Turkey. 2Im Ramstal 76, 97922 Lauda-Königshofen, Germany. 3Health Services Vocational School, Nevşehir Hacı BektaşVeli University, 50300, Nevşehir, Turkey. 4Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran. Corresponding author: *E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Turkey shows a notable diversity of habitats, with significant variations in altitude, rainfall, temperature, topography and geological history, which is reflected in its richness of biodiversity. Although there are quite a number of publications on the freshwater fish taxonomy, the data set for endemic freshwater fish as assemblages are poor. According to recent findings, a total of 194 endemic freshwater fish species are now recognised within the political boundaries of Turkey. Endemic fish consist of 47.4% of the Turkish freshwater ichthyofauna (409 species). At the family level, the Cyprinidae comprises the greatest number of endemic species (110 species; 56.7% of the endemic species), followed by the Nemacheilidae (31 species; 16.0%), Cyprinodontidae (18 species; 9.3%), Cobitidae (14 species; 7.2%), Salmonidae (12 species; 6.2%), Gobiidae (7 species; 3.6%), Petromyzontidae (1 species; 0.5%) and Clupeidae (1 species; 0.5%). A total of 143 species (73.71%) are found within a single basin. Considering species diversity, the Konya endorheic basin (64.10%) is the richest in endemics, followed by Burdur (52.38%), Büyük Menderes (40.28%), Van Gölü (38.46%) and Antalya (34.00%).
    [Show full text]
  • 202020 - Geography of Tourism / Geography of Tourism
    2021 - 2022 / 3401003202020 - GEOGRAPHY OF TOURISM / GEOGRAPHY OF TOURISM GENEL TANIM / GENERAL DESCRIPTION Ders Adı / Course Name GEOGRAPHY OF TOURISM / GEOGRAPHY OF TOURISM Ders Kodu / Course Code 3401003202020 Ders Türü / Course Type Ders Seviyesi / Course Level First Cycle / First Cycle Ders Akts Kredi / ECTS 3.00 Haftalık Ders Saati (Kuramsal) / 2.00 Course Hours For Week (Theoretical) Haftalık Uygulama Saati / Course 0.00 Hours For Week (Objected) Haftalık Laboratuar Saati / Course 0.00 Hours For Week (Laboratory) Dersin Verildiği Yıl / Year 3 Öğretim Sistemi / Teaching System Face to Face / Face to Face Eğitim Dili / Education Language Turkish / Turkish Ön Koşulu Olan Ders(ler) / Yoktur None Precondition Courses Amacı / Purpose Turizm ve coğrafya ilişkisini değerlendirmelerini sağlamak; turizm coğrafyasına özgü To enable to evaluate the relationship between tourism and geography; to recognize terminolojiyi tanımak; Türkiye'nin turizm coğrafyası değerlerini inceleme becerisi the terminology specific to tourism geography; to gain the ability of evaluating the kazandırmak. values of Turkey's tourism geography. İçeriği / Content Turizm ve coğrafya kavramlarından yola çıkarak dünyada ve Türkiye'de turizm coğrafyası Based on the concept of tourism and geography, the development of tourism alanının gelişimi izlenecektir. Türkiye'nin özellikle dağlar ve nehirler gibi doğal varlıkları geography as a field both in the world and in will be examined. Turkey's natural coğrafi ve kültürel bağlamları içerisinde ele alınacaktır. assets, such as mountains and rivers will be discussed in geographical and cultural contexts. Önerilen Diğer Hususlar / Yoktur None Recommended Other Considerations Staj Durumu / Internship Status yoktur None 1 / 9 Kitabı / Malzemesi / Önerilen Basılı Kaynaklar Published Literature Kaynaklar / Books / Materials / Gezgin, İ.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey 1934 Agreement Pertaining to the Construc
    Annex Annex Bilateral water agreements Annex Basin Parties Year Title 1 Meric Greece -Turkey 1934 Agreement pertaining to the construction of hydraulic facilities on both banks of the Meric-Evros River [own translation] 2 Meric Greece Turkey 1963 Protocol on the improvements of the River Meric watercourse that constitutes a significant portion of the Turkish-Greek Thracian Border [own translation] 3 Meric Bulgaria Turkey 1968 Agreement between the Republic of Turkey and the People’s Republic of Bulgaria on the Cooperation of the Utilization of the Waters of the Rivers Flowing in the Territories of the Two Countries [own translation] 4 Meric Bulgaria Turkey 1975 Agreement on Long Term Economic, Technical, Industrial and Scientific Cooperation between the Government of the Republic of Turkey and the Government of the People’s Republic of Bulgaria [own translation] 5 Meric Bulgaria Turkey 1993 Agreement on Assistance and Cooperation in the Field of Water for Reducing the Negative Effects of the Drought of 1993 [own translation] (continued) A. Kibaroglu et al. (eds.), Turkey’s Water Policy, 327 DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-19636-2, # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011 328 Annex Annex Basin Parties Year Title 6 Meric Turkey Bulgaria 1998 Agreement on Cooperation in the Fields of Energy and Infrastructure Between the Government of the Republic of Turkey and the Government of the Republic of Bulgaria [original extract] 7 Meric Turkey Bulgaria 2002 Protocol of the Fifteenth Session of the Turkish-Bulgarian Joint Committee For Economic and Technical
    [Show full text]