DOCSLIB.ORG

Phi+Kappa+Psi+Rolling+Stone+Complaint+2015-11-09.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Phi+Kappa+Psi+Rolling+Stone+Complaint+2015-11-09.Pdf COMPLAINT TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT: COMES NOW the Virginia Alpha Chapter of Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity (“Plaintiff” or “Phi Kappa Psi”), and moves the Court for entry of judgment on its behalf against Rolling Stone LLC, Wenner Media LLC., Straight Arrow Publishers LLC, and Sabrina Rubin Erdely (collectively, “Rolling Stone” or “Defendants”), jointly and severally, and in support thereof respectfully states the following: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is a defamation action brought by the Virginia Alpha Chapter of the Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity against Rolling Stone and Sabrina Rubin Erdely, the writer and Contributing Editor of an article entitled “A Rape on Campus: A Brutal Assault and Struggle for Justice at UVA” (the “Article”), which was featured in a Rolling Stone publication issued on November 19, 2014. This action is brought in direct response to the defamatory statements made in Rolling Stone’s Article, as well as to subsequent statements made by Erdely and Rolling Stone which repeated and reinforced the defamatory statements made in the original Article. The Article described in graphic detail the horrifying ordeal of a University of Virginia freshman woman identified as “Jackie.” Jackie was brought to a Phi Kappa Psi date function held on September 28, 2012, by a third-year UVA undergraduate and member of Phi Kappa Psi, identified as “Drew.” Jackie met Drew at the UVA Aquatic and Fitness Center, where they both worked. During the Phi Kappa Psi party, Jackie was given alcoholic punch to drink, and then led upstairs into a dark bedroom by Drew. As soon as she entered the bedroom, 2 Jackie was tackled and sent backwards onto a low glass table, which shattered and caused shards of glass to dig into her back. She was punched, pinned to the table, a hand was clamped over her mouth, and her legs were pried apart. She was then ritually raped by seven Phi Kappa Psi fraternity members for three agonizing hours. One of the rapists began the ritual by shouting “Grab its motherfucking leg.” The gang-rape was a Phi Kappa Psi initiation rite. During the ritual rape one of Jackie’s assailants chastised one of the other assailants, saying: “Don’t you want to be a brother? We all had to do it, so you do, too.” Jackie was repeatedly raped, as well as violated with a beer bottle, which was shoved into her. The Article goes on to recount Jackie describing her horrific experience to three friends on the night of the atrocity, and later to officials within UVA, all of whom were insensitive and unsupportive, acting as apologists for what the Article portrayed as UVA’s culture of rape. In the aftermath of the Article, Phi Kappa Psi and its members became the object of an avalanche of condemnation worldwide. 2. The Article, however, was entirely false and a complete fabrication. The infirmities in the Article were first exposed by other news organizations, such as The Washington Post, which noted fundamental flaws in Jackie’s account and raised the possibility that the entire story may have been concocted. Rolling Stone reacted to these reports by doubling down on its original Article, standing by its story, engaging in deception and cover-up, and issuing interviews and public statements that lied about its sourcing. Investigations by the Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity, the University of Virginia, and the Charlottesville Police Department, however, would reveal that the gang-rape never happened. There was no Phi Kappa Psi date function on September 28, 2012. The ringleader of the alleged gang-rape, “Drew,” did not exist. No member of Phi Kappa Psi worked at the Aquatic Center with Jackie. Jackie was not gang-raped, or sexually 3 assaulted by anyone in any manner at Phi Kappa Psi, nor was she assaulted by any Phi Kappa Psi member at any other time or place. The interactions Jackie described with her three friends on the night of the alleged event did not take place, and the quotations attributed to those friends were fabricated. The portrayal of insensitivity to Jackie’s allegations by UVA officials was false, and included fabricated statements by those officials. Rolling Stone, caught in this colossal act of defamatory falsehood, commissioned the prestigious Columbia Graduate School of Journalism, led by the School’s Dean, Steve Coll, along with Sheila Coronel and Derek Kravitz, to investigate the episode. The Columbia Journalism School issued a devastating Report, severely criticizing Rolling Stone, its writer and editors for failing to corroborate Jackie’s story before publishing the Article. Thereafter, Rolling Stone retracted the Article, and admitted its falsehood. 3. This defamation action alleges that Rolling Stone set out in advance to find a sensational story of graphic and violent rape, searched for such a story at elite universities, and rejected other possible stories because the sexual assaults they portrayed were too “normal.” Rolling Stone endorsed and encouraged Erdely’s efforts to troll elite American college campuses in search of a sensational and graphic rape narrative, and rejected potential stories from universities such as Yale that lacked the sensational quality Rolling Stone sought. Rolling Stone and Erdely had an agenda, and they were recklessly oblivious to the harm they would cause innocent victims in their ruthless pursuit of that agenda. 4. Rolling Stone knew from the beginning that Jackie was an unreliable source and that her story was questionable. Rolling Stone intentionally and deliberately failed to verify the existence of Drew or to contact Drew, intentionally and deliberately 4 neglected to contact or interview any of the friends Jackie spoke to on the night of the heinous crime, intentionally and deliberately neglected to verify that a date function had taken place at the Phi Kappa Psi House on that night, intentionally and deliberately misled and manipulated the leader of Phi Kappa Psi in a last-minute request for comment so as to falsely portray Phi Kappa Psi as stonewalling Rolling Stone, and intentionally and deliberately neglected to obtain records and information that would have demonstrated the falsity of Jackie’s story. The Article was intentionally crafted to deceive readers into believing Rolling Stone had identified Drew and spoken to all key witnesses, when in fact Rolling Stone had itself developed the idea of simply creating a fictional name for the assailant, having also intentionally decided not to identify or interview Drew or any of Jackie’s three friends. These actions by Rolling Stone were part of an intentional and deliberate quid pro quo arrangement in which Rolling Stone intentionally avoided sourcing and corroborating the story in return for Jackie’s continuing cooperation and willingness to not back down from her story. All Rolling Stone wanted and needed was a willing source—Jackie—who would stick to her incredible claims and provide Rolling Stone with a patina of journalistic cover. Rolling Stone knew that the publication of its story would and should result in investigations and prosecutions of Phi Kappa Psi and its individual members; that said investigations would result in long prison sentences—perhaps sentences for life; and that its Article all but assured the utter destruction of the reputations of Phi Kappa Psi and its individual members. These allegations did not concern harmless fraternity pranks. These were allegations of ritualized and criminal gang-rape that Rolling Stone knew were the predicates for annihilation of Phi Kappa Psi and widespread persecution of its members. Allegations of systematic gang-rape carried out in the service of institutional policy are conventionally 5 connected with war crimes and brutal, uncivil cultures; yet, despite knowing the severity of Jackie’s allegations, Rolling Stone allowed the atrocious behavior described in the Article to become forever associated with Phi Kappa Psi. Rolling Stone knew that it was uncertain as to whether Jackie’s incredible story was true or false. It knew it needed to corroborate and verify its story, yet its reporters and editors conspired not to do so. Editors and fact-checkers inside Rolling Stone spotted red flags that indicated the story was flawed and raised alarms, yet nothing was done. Rolling Stone published the Article—the story was simply too tempting, too sensational, to let facts get in the way. 5. Rape is a brutal and heinous crime, and sexual assault on American campuses must not be tolerated; however, serious public discourse about sexual assault is not served by the intentional publication of a lurid and horrific story that was intentionally and callously not corroborated, notwithstanding the publisher’s serious subjective doubts that the account was true. In the most scurrilous traditions of yellow tabloid journalism, Rolling Stone published a devastating story it knowingly failed to verify, in reckless disregard for truth or falsity, or the essential safety, dignity, and welfare of the organization or of those lives it was willing to crush with its defamatory Article and subsequent cover-up attempts. This defamation action is brought to seek redress for the wanton destruction caused to Phi Kappa Psi by Rolling Stone’s intentional, reckless, and unethical behavior. 6 PARTIES, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE 6. Defendant Rolling Stone LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business in New York. Rolling Stone LLC has only one member, which is Wenner Media LLC, a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business in New York. The sole member of Wenner Media LLC is Straight Arrow Publishers LLC, which is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business in New York. The members of Straight Arrow Publishers LLC are: (1) Straight Arrow Publishers Inc.; (2) the Jacob Eisner 2012 Trust 45; (3) the Sophie Eisner 2012 Trust 45; (4) the Robin Ruddell 2012 Trust 45; (5) the 2006 Wenner Family LLC; (6) Megan Kingsbury; (7) Jacob Eisner; (8) Sophie Eisner; (9) the Kalei Wenner Irrevocable Trust.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fake News' Is Equal: How Should Higher Education Respond to Fake News and in the Post- Truth Era Thomas E
    The Liminal: Interdisciplinary Journal of Technology in Education Volume 1 | Issue 1 Article 3 August 2019 Not All 'Fake News' Is Equal: How Should Higher Education Respond to Fake News and in the post- Truth Era Thomas E. Keefe Rocky Mountain College of Art and Design, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/theliminal Part of the Higher Education Commons, and the Language and Literacy Education Commons Recommended Citation Keefe, Thomas E. (2019) "Not All 'Fake News' Is Equal: How Should Higher Education Respond to Fake News and in the post-Truth Era," The Liminal: Interdisciplinary Journal of Technology in Education: Vol. 1 : Iss. 1 , Article 3. Available at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/theliminal/vol1/iss1/3 This Article Discussing a Construct is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Liminal: Interdisciplinary Journal of Technology in Education by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. Keefe: Not All 'Fake News' Is Equal In examining how higher education ought to respond to ‘fake news’ and the landscape of the ‘post-truth’ world, it is imperative to distinguish between accidental, ignorant, or intentional factual inaccuracies. The motives of accidental, ignorant, or disinformation are not uniform and, as such, the responses by institutions of higher education must not be uniform either. These three forms of erroneous information are as old as literacy itself, but with increased literacy as well as increased access to forms of dissemination and publication, the dangers of untrue information have been magnified.
    [Show full text]
  • 60 Literary Journalism Studies 61 by Any Other Name: the Case for Literary Journalism
    60 Literary Journalism Studies 61 By Any Other Name: The Case for Literary Journalism Josh Roiland University of Maine, United States Keynote Response: Literary journalism has experienced a resurgence in recent years, and like all popular movements it has sustained a backlash from those who believe it fetishizes narrative at the expense of research and reporting. New Yorker writer Nicholas Lemann’s IALJS-10 keynote talk returned the spotlight to the social function of journalism: to provide “a running account of the world.” He argues that for literary journalism to complete that task, it must privilege research and reporting over artistic expression. This response essay expands on Lemann’s talk by clarifying mis- conceptions about what the “literary” in literary journalism means, and demonstrates that the debates about what to call this genre—debates that have been rekindled in recent years with the ascendance of such vague-but- vogue terms “long form” and “long reads”—are not new. This narrative history explores both the misbegotten trail of the term “literary journalism” and its attendant field of study, but it also argues that the label long form represents a neoliberalization of language that positions readers not to con- sider or question, but only to consume. ut however vague and slippery a term, the New Journalism has become “Ba convenient label for recent developments in nonfiction writing and for the sharp critical controversy this writing has stirred up.” So wrote Ronald Weber in his 1974 preface to the book he had compiled and edited, The Re- porter as Artist: A Look at the New Journalism Controversy.1 Some four decades later, standing before a confederation of several dozen literary journalism scholars who had gathered from across the globe in Minneapolis, Nicholas Lemann wasted little time getting to the question that has bedeviled not only his audience of academics but also practitioners and, increasingly, casual read- ers: “What is literary journalism anyway?”2 Nearly every book-length work of Literary Journalism Studies Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Friends of the Writers House
    Dear Friends of the Writers House, ne week into September, we his family contributed punningly burnt-up embarked on something entirely John Ash-berries to our Edible Books party, new. Our free and open online along with stunningly rendered gingerbread Ocourse on modern and contemporary Kindles. Over 100 ModPo’ers demonstrated American poetry — ModPo, as it’s known their belief in our mission by responding with — launched with an enrollment of 42,000 extraordinary generosity to our annual KWH people from more than 120 countries. The fundraising campaign. Kelly Writers House course was based on Al’s famous “English Indeed, this was the year in which we felt 3805 Locust Walk Philadelphia, PA 19104-6150 88,” a class he has taught for more than 20 our community truly expand in new and tel: 215-746-POEM years. Through a series of video discussions exciting ways, reminding us that, after almost fax: 215-573-9750 and live interactive webcasts, led by Al and a two decades of innovative work, the potential email: [email protected] trusty band of teaching assistants, the ModPo for what we can do here is still nearly limitless. web: writing.upenn.edu/wh experiment brought a KWH-style learning In the pages of this annual you’ll read mode into homes, offices, and schools around more about ModPo and several of the the world. other projects that made us proud this year. Now, months after the ten-week MOOC On pages 16-17 we share news about our wrapped, we’re still in touch with ModPo’ers expanded outreach to prospective Penn from all over, many of whom have traveled students and the great work of Jamie-Lee great distances to visit us here in Philadelphia, Josselyn (C’05), who travels the country to to express their enthusiasm for our space and seek out talented young writers.
    [Show full text]
  • Eramo Counter-Statement
    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Charlottesville Division ) NICOLE P. ERAMO ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) Case No. 3:15-cv-00023-GEC ) ROLLING STONE LLC, ) SABRINA RUBIN ERDELY, and ) WENNER MEDIA LLC, ) ) Defendants. ) COUNTER-STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff Nicole P. Eramo, through her undersigned counsel, respectfully submits this Counter-Statement of Material Facts in Support of Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. I. Before Setting Out To Write “A Rape on Campus,” Erdely Had A History Of Writing About Rape And Institutional Indifference To Rape. 1. During her tenure as a journalist, Erdely has written many articles accusing various institutions of being indifferent to — or covering up — allegations of rape. Indeed, Erdely’s articles about rape have a common thread in that they identify some vulnerable victim of sexual abuse and an indifferent institution to whom the victim reports her assault. 2. In April 1996, Erdely authored “Intimate Intimidation,” an article published in Philadelphia Magazine. (May 12, 2016 Deposition of Sabrina Rubin Erdely at 44:10-13 (“Erdely Dep.”) (Ex. 1); Sabrina Rubin Erdely, “Intimate Intimidation,” Philadelphia Magazine (April 1996) (“Intimate Intimidation”) (Ex. 2).) Much like “A Rape On Campus,” “Intimate Case 3:15-cv-00023-GEC Document 116 Filed 07/22/16 Page 1 of 93 Pageid#: 5482 Intimidation” begins with a horrifying narrative of a woman being sexually assaulted. Rather than the assault occurring by fraternity members at UVA, Gail Greeby, the protagonist of the article, was assaulted by her gynecologist.
    [Show full text]
  • Black V. Cable News Network, Inc
    Reporter’s Workshop – Black v. Cable News Network, Inc. The Panel Thomas R. Julin Moderator – Shareholder – Gunster Yoakley & Stewart, P.A., Miami, Florida Mamie Joveer AXS Law Group and chair of the Florida Bar Media & Communications Law Committee F. Shields McManus Former Circuit Court Judge and former partner with Willie Gary – Stuart, Florida James Sammataro Managing Partner, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan – Miami Office Introduction Palm Beach billionaire Jeff Greene ran for the U.S. Senate in 2010 and became the leading candidate for the Democratic Party nomination. The Miami Herald and St. Petersburg Times published articles shortly before the election accusing Greene of involvement with mortgage fraud and of hosting Mike Tyson orgies on his yacht, the Summerwind. Greene lost the election. Represented by L. Lin Wood, Jr. Greene sued both newspapers for libel. The lawsuit initially was dismissed, but then reinstated by the Third District Court of Appeal which found the allegations of actual malice were sufficient. Judge Robert Luck denied a motion for summary judgment and the case was then settled, supposedly for seven figures. Now another Florida libel suit poses a significant challenge for the news media. The following summarizes allegations from the complaint in Black v. CNN and from other documents in a related case, and from news accounts about the litigation.. Elizabeth Cohen is a Journalistic Superstar for CNN 1. Primary reporter is Elizabeth Cohen – a Superstar at CNN – Has “an Agenda-Driven Journalism Career.” BA from Columbia University and a Master of Public Health from Boston University. 2. In 2003 developed her “Empowered Patient” brand.
    [Show full text]
  • 18 March APICS Newsletter
    Monthly Newsletter s Buffalo Chapter No. 21 March 2018 The Mind of a Leader: Can Professional Development Meeting Cognitive Science Help Us Become Better Leaders? Wednesday, March 21, 2018 Are leaders born or made? And if they are made, how does one go about becoming a leader? Is leadership an art or a science? What are some of the skills and talents a leader needs, and how are those skills and talents learned? This presentation is an investigation of how cognitive science has been providing clues and direction for devel- oping, or becoming, a leader. Practical takeaways will include how to increase your self- awareness, increasing empathy and social intelligence to better understand those you lead, better ways to build and work with a team, and how to develop decisiveness. About the Speaker: BOB COLLINS, CFPIM, CIRM, CSCP Senior Director of Professional Development for APICS BOB COLLINS, CFPIM, CIRM, CSCP, is the Senior Director of Professional Development for APICS. Collins is responsible for certification and non-certification courseware and the APICS Instructor Development Program (IDP). Prior to joining the APICS staff 11 years ago, Collins worked as both a practitioner and consultant in the operations management and supply chain field, and is a long time APICS member, volunteer and instruc- tor, including Chapter President in 1996 and APICS International President in 2003. He is an experienced APICS instructor and an APICS Master of Instructor Training, having taught over 1200 hours of the APICS CPIM and CIRM courses to companies around the United States and several hundred hours of Instructor Training courses to APICS instructors around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Mpjo-‐500-‐01: Ethics
    MPJO-500-01: ETHICS GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: MPS JOURNALISM Wednesdays, 5:20 p.m. to 8 p.m. | Fall 2015 Instructor: CArole FeldmAn Downtown campus, Room C229 • Office hours are by appointment. COURSE OVERVIEW It’s often said that journalists are the eyes and ears for a public that can’t be everywhere at once. That role comes with responsibilities for delivering the news accurately and fairly. And it comes with pressures, in the ever-changing media environment, to get the story first. Sometimes, those two collide. Journalists are confronted with ethical dilemmas on a routine basis. But there’s no black-and- white answer for many of them. This class is therefore intended to explore the myriad gray areas that dominate the way journalists work and live, the blurry lines that divide right from wrong, or, more accurately, divide “probably should” from “probably shouldn’t.” And, it will examine why ethical journalists sometimes come down on opposite sides of an issue. The class is designed to help you understand the ethical implications of the choices journalists make, to empower you to navigate the ethical minefield of attempting every day to explain to the world the activities of other people. This is a core course of the MPS JournAlism progrAm, And students must eArn A “B” (83) or higher to pAss the course. PleAse see the GrAduAte Student HAndbook for more detAils. COURSE OBJECTIVES By the end of this course, students will: • Understand the basic tenets of journalism ethics and ways to apply them • Know how to find, track and discuss current ethical issues • Be familiar with the major case studies of journalism ethics • Be familiar with the ethics/standards code of a news organization of their choosing • Be familiar with the intersection of journalism ethics and media law REQUIRED READING Each student must read a daily newspaper, either the online or paper version, or an online news site such as CNN.com, huffingtonpost.com or politico.com.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rape on Campus” Sean Johnson, Logan Jordan Karina Luis, Riley Smith
    1 Rolling With It: UVA’s Response to Rolling Stone’s “A Rape on Campus” Sean Johnson, Logan Jordan Karina Luis, Riley Smith Executive summary 2 In November 2014, the University of Virginia was rocked by allegations, made by Rolling Stone Magazine, of a brutal on-campus gang rape. The article in question recounted the story of Jackie, a first year student at UVA who accused members of the Phi Kappa Psi fraternity of her vicious rape. An investigation about the rape allegations ensued and shortly after Rolling Stone retracted the article as evidence accumulated in contrast to Jackie's claims. In the following months UVA began making strides to open the dialogue about sexual misconduct on college campuses. By actively participating in the conversation about on campus sexual assault, UVA was able to become a leader in the fight to make America’s public universities more safe. Table of Contents Organizational Background - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 Communication Structure - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 3 Industry Analysis - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6 ● Leaders & Competitors - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6 ● Recent Trends - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -7 ● Industry Issues - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 Market Analysis - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Assault Adjudication on Campus: Examining the Underlying Discourses of Title IX
    University of Northern Colorado Scholarship & Creative Works @ Digital UNC Dissertations Student Research 8-2019 Sexual Assault Adjudication on Campus: Examining the Underlying Discourses of Title IX Colleen Sonnentag Follow this and additional works at: https://digscholarship.unco.edu/dissertations Recommended Citation Sonnentag, Colleen, "Sexual Assault Adjudication on Campus: Examining the Underlying Discourses of Title IX" (2019). Dissertations. 587. https://digscholarship.unco.edu/dissertations/587 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at Scholarship & Creative Works @ Digital UNC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholarship & Creative Works @ Digital UNC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © 2019 Colleen Sonnentag ALL RIGHTS RESERVED UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO Greeley, Colorado The Graduate School SEXUAL ASSAULT ADJUDICATION ON CAMPUS: EXAMINING THE UNDERLYING DISCOURSES OF TITLE IX A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Colleen Sonnentag College of Education and Behavioral Sciences Leadership, Policy and Development: Higher Education and P-12 Education Higher Education and Student Affairs Leadership August 2019 This dissertation by: Colleen Sonnentag Entitled: Sexual Assault Adjudication on Campus: Examining the Underlying Discourses of Title IX has been approved as meeting the requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in College of
    [Show full text]
  • NR-Winter-2017.Pdf
    NIEMAN REPORTS COVERING SEXUAL ASSAULT Contributors The Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard University www.niemanreports.org publisher Ann Marie Lipinski editor James Geary Michael Blanding (page 34 and 42) is a senior fellow at the senior editor Schuster Institute for Investigative Journalism at Brandeis Jan Gardner University. His work has appeared in Wired, Slate, The Nation, The Boston Globe Magazine, and other publications. His most editorial assistant recent book “The Map Thief: The Gripping Story of an Esteemed Eryn M. Carlson Rare-Map Dealer Who Made Millions Stealing Priceless Maps” design was named an NPR Book of the Year in 2014. Pentagram editorial offices Uri Blau (page 8), a 2014 Nieman Fellow, is a One Francis Avenue, Cambridge, Washington-based investigative journalist for MA 02138-2098, 617-496-6308, Haaretz. He took part in the Panama Papers [email protected] reporting project and is a grantee of the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting. Copyright 2017 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. Periodicals postage paid at Naomi Darom (page 12), a 2016 Nieman Boston, Massachusetts and Fellow, is a visiting researcher at Boston additional entries University’s Elie Wiesel Center. She is a contributing writer at Musaf Haaretz, the subscriptions/business weekend magazine for Haaretz in Israel. 617-496-6299, [email protected] Subscription $25 a year, Alyson Martin and Nushin Rashidian (page $40 for two years; 14) are co-founders of Cannabis Wire, a news add $10 per year for foreign airmail. outlet that covers the global cannabis industry, Single copies $7.50. and co-authors of the 2014 book “A New Leaf: Back copies are available from The End of Cannabis Prohibition.” Martin is the Nieman office.
    [Show full text]
  • Group Defamation, Power, and a New Test for Determining Plaintiff Eligibility
    Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal Volume 28 XXVIII Number 4 Article 4 2018 Group Defamation, Power, and a New Test for Determining Plaintiff Eligibility Jeffrey Greenwood Fordham University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/iplj Part of the First Amendment Commons, Intellectual Property Law Commons, and the Torts Commons Recommended Citation Jeffrey Greenwood, Group Defamation, Power, and a New Test for Determining Plaintiff Eligibility, 28 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 871 (2018). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/iplj/vol28/iss4/4 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Group Defamation, Power, and a New Test for Determining Plaintiff Eligibility Cover Page Footnote Editor-in-Chief, Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal, Volume XXIX; J.D. Candidate, Fordham University School of Law, 2019; B.S., Neuroscience and Behavioral Biology, Emory University, 2006. I would like to thank Benjamin Zipursky for his patient guidance during the writing process, the staff and editors of the IPLJ, and in particular Jillian Roffer for countless rounds of edits. A special thanks to my parents Anna and Ronald, friends, and Laura who provided support and useful comments throughout. This note is available in Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/iplj/vol28/iss4/4 Group Defamation, Power, and a New Test for Determining Plaintiff Eligibility Jeffrey I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trials of Alice Goffman
    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/17/magazine/the-trials-of-alice- goffman.html?_r=0?register=google The Trials of Alice Goffman Her first book, ‘On the Run' — about the lives of young black men in West Philadelphia — has fueled a fight within sociology over who gets to speak for whom. By GIDEON LEWIS-KRAUSJAN. 12, 2016 Before the morning last September when I joined her at Newark Airport, I had met Alice Goffman only twice. But in the previous months, amid a widening controversy both inside and outside the academy over her research, she and I had developed a regular email correspondence, and she greeted me at the gate as if I were an old friend. A 34-year-old untenured professor of sociology at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, Goffman had just begun a year of leave at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, which she hoped she might use to escape her critics and get back to work. Now, though, she was returning to Madison for a four-day visit, to deliver a lecture and catch up with her graduate students. The object of dispute was Goffman’s debut book, ‘‘On the Run,’’ which chronicles the social world of a group of young black men in a mixed-income neighborhood in West Philadelphia, some of them low-level drug dealers who live under constant threat of arrest and cycle in and out of prison. She began the project as a 20-year-old undergraduate at the University of Pennsylvania; eventually she moved to be closer to the neighborhood, which in the book she calls ‘‘Sixth Street,’’ and even took in two of her subjects as roommates.
    [Show full text]