Chapter 3 Extracting Information from Geological Maps & Folds

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter 3 Extracting Information from Geological Maps & Folds Chapter 3 Extracting Information from Geological Maps & Folds Geologic Maps Geologic maps are one of the most fundamental types of geologic docu- ments and yet they are a strange mixture of data and interpretation; it is often not easy to tell one from the other. Published maps are all solid colors and bold, confi- dent lines; they look like they are representing data. In this Chapter, we will build on the visualization that we began in Chapter 1 and the vector methods from Chapter 2 to introduce you to some of the types of information that you can ex- tract from a geologic map. Most of the features that we deal with at a map scale are approximately pla- nar features — stratigraphic contacts, faults, dikes, etc. — and, more often than not, they are not horizontal. At a regional scale, the surface of the earth where we make most of our observations is pretty planar but, at more detailed scales, topog- raphy is very irregular. Mapping the outcrop patterns of these planar features is ba- sically an exercise in locating the line of intersection between the planar feature and the irregular 3D surface of the Earth. CHAPTER 3 GEOLOGICAL MAPS Three Point Problems Some Common Map Symbols Contact A geologist cannot always go the the Fault field and put a compass on the rock to de- Thrust fault, saw teeth on upper plate termine a strike and dip. Even when s/he Fault, bar and ball on downthrown side can do so, we frequently want to know the orientation of a planar rock unit at a scale Anticlinal trace of axial surface larger than the outcrop scale. That is, we synclinal trace of axial surface want to know the average orientation at a Overturned anticline trace of axial map scale. Fortunately, our geologic maps surface with trend and plunge of hinge provide sufficient information to enable the Overturned syncline trace of axial surface Strike and Dip of Bedding, of overturned structural geologist to determine orientation bedding independent of outcrop and compass. Strike and Dip of Cleavage or foliation, of joint The orientation of a plane can be de- termined if we know the positions of three non-collinear points within the plane. Because the surface of the earth has variable topography, we can commonly find three points on a plane at different topographic elevations. Geologic maps com- 7600 ft slope distance Js −1 ⎛ 800 ft ⎞ δ = tan = 38° ⎝⎜ 1025.5 ft⎠⎟ 6800 ft map distance = 1025.5 ft 200 0! 1000 m Figure 3.1 — The classical three-point problem where a line is draw between two points of equal elevation on a planar surface, yielding the strike (left). On the right is the construc- tion in a vertical plane parallel to the line labeled “1025.5” (feet) on the map for calculating the dip using the elevation values (in feet) and map distance. MODERN STRUCTURAL PRACTICE "50 R. W. ALLMENDINGER © 2015-16 CHAPTER 3 GEOLOGICAL MAPS monly depict topography with contour lines and, even if they don’t, modern digital elevation models are available for most of the earth’s surface and the elevation of any point can be determined via the Internet. Figure 3.1 shows the classical way of determining strike and dip from a geo- logic map with topographic contours. This simple method takes advantage of the fact that a line connecting two points of equal elevation along a mapped contact of a planar feature define the strike of a plane. The dip can then be calculated from a third point at different elevation from a simple geometric construction. Both the map distance, and the elevation difference to the third point, perpendicular to the strike, can be read directly off the geologic map. A more general method takes advantage of the vector methods we’ve just learned in the previous chapter. It is more flexible because all three points can be at different elevations and can be used wherever we have spot elevations but no topo- graphic contours (e.g., in Google Earth). We use the cross product of two vectors in a plane — just like we did in the previous Chapter to determine the true dip from two apparent dips — but this time we are not using unit vectors describing orienta- tions of two lines in the plane, but are using position vectors whose magnitude is much greater than one (Fig. 3.2). A position vector is a line connecting a point in space to the origin of the co- ordinate system (P1, P2, and P3 in Fig. 3.2). The coordinates of the position vector are just the scalar components of the vector projected onto the coordinate system axes. In the case of our geologic map, we could use the UTM coordinates (eastings U Figure 3.2 — Three points in a plane can be N v used to calculate the orientation of a plane. P2 The coordinates of the three points are the u coordinates of the three position vectors, P1, P2, and P3. To get the vectors that lie P1 P3 within the plane, v and u, we use vector subtraction as described in the text. The pole to the plane is calculated from v × u. E MODERN STRUCTURAL PRACTICE "51 R. W. ALLMENDINGER © 2015-16 CHAPTER 3 GEOLOGICAL MAPS and northings) plus elevation to define the position vector in an East-North-Up co- ordinate system. Or, we could use any other local Cartesian coordinate system. To calculate the pole to the plane, we will use the cross product of two vec- tors in the plane, v and u. These two vectors can be calculated from the position vectors using vector subtraction. The complete sequence of steps is given, below: The first step is to subtract the position vectors to get v and u. Note that at this point, we are working in an ENU coordinate system so the subscripts in the fol- lowing equation correspond to the axes of our coordinate system: 1=E, 2=N, and 3=U. v ⎡ P2 P1 P2 P1 P2 P1 ⎤ = ⎢ ( 1 − 1 ) ( 2 − 2 ) ( 3 − 3 ) ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ (3.1) ⎡ ⎤ u = (P31 − P11 ) (P32 − P12 ) (P33 − P13 ) ⎣⎢ ⎦⎥ To convert these to a lower hemisphere NED centric coordinate system — which we will need in order to calculate our orientations — we switch the order of the first two components of the vector and multiply the third by –1: v ⎡ P2 P1 P2 P1 P2 P1 ⎤ ′ = ⎢ ( 2 − 2 ) ( 1 − 1 ) −( 3 − 3 ) ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ (3.2) ⎡ ⎤ u′ = (P32 − P12 ) (P31 − P11 ) −(P33 − P13 ) ⎣⎢ ⎦⎥ The cross product is defined as: " v′ × u′ = ⎡ v u − v u v u − v u v u − v u ⎤ = ⎡ s s s ⎤ (3.3) ⎣⎢ ( 2 3 3 2 ) ( 3 1 1 3 ) ( 1 2 2 1 ) ⎦⎥ ⎣ 1 2 3 ⎦ The cross product gives us the pole to the plane but we need to convert it to a unit vector before it can be transformed back into geographic orientations like trend and plunge or strike and dip. We start by calculating the magnitude of cross prod- uct, smagn: 2 2 2 " smagn = s1 + s2 + s3 (3.4) MODERN STRUCTURAL PRACTICE "52 R. W. ALLMENDINGER © 2015-16 CHAPTER 3 GEOLOGICAL MAPS And now we calculate the unit pole vector, " pˆ , by dividing each component of s by its magnitude, smagn. ⎡ s s s ⎤ " pˆ = ⎡ p p p ⎤ = ⎢ 1 2 3 ⎥ (3.5) ⎣ 1 2 3 ⎦ s s s ⎣⎢ magn magn magn ⎦⎥ If the third component is negative, i.e., p3 < 0, then the unit pole vector we have calculated points into the upper hemisphere. To covert to the lower hemisphere in this case, multiply each component by –1. We’re now ready to convert our unit pole vector back to trend and plunge. The plunge is straightforward because it is just the arcsine of the p3 component of the pole to the plane: −1 " plunge = sin ( p3 ) (3.6) As we saw in Chapter 2, the trend is a function of p2 and p1 and the sign of p1. If p1 ≥ 0 then you use the equation on the left, below; otherwise use the equation on the right: −1 ⎛ p2 ⎞ −1 ⎛ p2 ⎞ " trend = tan ⎜ ⎟ or trend = 180 + tan ⎜ ⎟ (3.7) ⎝ p1 ⎠ ⎝ p1 ⎠ To get the right-hand rule strike, just add 90° to the trend; the dip is 90°–plunge. Figure 3.3 — A three point calcu- lation in GMDE. This program can also calculate the uncertainties; those shown here are given a hori- zontal and vertical uncertainty of 40 ft. MODERN STRUCTURAL PRACTICE "53 R. W. ALLMENDINGER © 2015-16 CHAPTER 3 GEOLOGICAL MAPS Figure 3.4 — The spreadsheet to do the same calculation as shown in Figure 3.3. Note that the switch from an ENU to an NED coordi- nate system occurs in row 11. The program GeolMapDataExtractor (GMDE) can do this calculation for you automatically (Fig. 3.3), and the equations we have just seen are exactly how the program does it. As a scientist, you are, of course, not content to trust your pre- cious data to a canned program, and thus will want to calculate these values your- self. Figure 3.4 shows you how to set up your spreadsheet using the same values as in Figure 3.3. Stratigraphic Thickness from Maps Stratigraphic thickness is defined as the thickness of a unit measured per- pendicular to the upper and lower surfaces of the unit. For people truly interested in stratigraphic sequences, there is still no substitute for going out in the field and measuring a stratigraphic section with tape, compass, Jacob staff, or whatever. Mea- suring section that way is certainly the most accurate way to determine the thick- ness of a unit but the process is time-consuming.
Recommended publications
  • Tectonic Imbrication and Foredeep Development in the Penokean
    Tectonic Imbrication and Foredeep Development in the Penokean Orogen, East-Central Minnesota An Interpretation Based on Regional Geophysics and the Results of Test-Drilling The Penokean Orogeny in Minnesota and Upper Michigan A Comparison of Structural Geology U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1904-C, D AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the cur­ rent-year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Sur­ vey publications released prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List." Publications that are listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" are no longer available. Prices of reports released to the open files are given in the listing "U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Reports," updated month­ ly, which is for sale in microfiche from the U.S. Geological Survey, Books and Open-File Reports Section, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225. Reports released through the NTIS may be obtained by writing to the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161; please include NTIS report number with inquiry. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices given below. BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications of general in­ Books of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Strike and Dip Refer to the Orientation Or Attitude of a Geologic Feature. The
    Name__________________________________ 89.325 – Geology for Engineers Faults, Folds, Outcrop Patterns and Geologic Maps I. Properties of Earth Materials When rocks are subjected to differential stress the resulting build-up in strain can cause deformation. Depending on the material properties the result can either be elastic deformation which can ultimately lead to the breaking of the rock material (faults) or ductile deformation which can lead to the development of folds. In this exercise we will look at the various types of deformation and how geologists use geologic maps to understand this deformation. II. Strike and Dip Strike and dip refer to the orientation or attitude of a geologic feature. The strike line of a bed, fault, or other planar feature, is a line representing the intersection of that feature with a horizontal plane. On a geologic map, this is represented with a short straight line segment oriented parallel to the strike line. Strike (or strike angle) can be given as either a quadrant compass bearing of the strike line (N25°E for example) or in terms of east or west of true north or south, a single three digit number representing the azimuth, where the lower number is usually given (where the example of N25°E would simply be 025), or the azimuth number followed by the degree sign (example of N25°E would be 025°). The dip gives the steepest angle of descent of a tilted bed or feature relative to a horizontal plane, and is given by the number (0°-90°) as well as a letter (N, S, E, W) with rough direction in which the bed is dipping.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Geology
    FIELD GEOLOGY GUIDEBOOK AND NOTES ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY 2018 Version 2 Table of Contents Syllabus 5 Schedule 8 Hazard Recognition Mitigation 9 Geologic Field Notes 17 Reconnaissance Notes 17 Measuring Stratigraphic Column Notes 18 Geologic Mapping Notes 19 Geologic Maps and Mapping 22 Variables affecting the appearance of a geologic map 23 Techniques to test the quality and accuracy of your map 23 Common map errors 24 Official USGS map colors 24 Rule of V’s 25 Geologic Cross Sections 26 Basic principles of cross section construction 26 Apparent dips: correct use of strike and dip data in cross sections 27 Common cross section errors 27 Steps in making a topographic profile for a geologic cross section 28 Constructing geologic cross sections using down-plunge projection 29 Phanerozoic Stratigraphy of North America 33 Tectonic History of the U.S. Cordillera 38 Regional Cross-sections through Wyoming 41 Wyoming Stratigraphic Nomenclature Chart 42 Rock Sequence in the Bighorn Basin 43 Rock Sequence in the Powder River Basin 44 Black Hills Precambrian Geology 45 Project Descriptions 47 Regional Stratigraphy 47 Amsden Creek Big Game Winter Range 49 Steerhead Ranch 50 Alkali 53 South Fork 55 Mickelson 57 Moonshine 60 Appendix 1: Essential Analysis Tools and Techniques for Field Geology 62 Field description of rocks 62 Measuring stratigraphic sections 69 Calculating layer thicknesses 76 Alignment diagram for calculating apparent dip 77 Calculating strike and dip of a surface from contacts on a map 78 Calculating outcrop patterns from field
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of a Highly Dilatant Fault Zone in the Grabens of Canyonlands
    Solid Earth, 6, 839–855, 2015 www.solid-earth.net/6/839/2015/ doi:10.5194/se-6-839-2015 © Author(s) 2015. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Evolution of a highly dilatant fault zone in the grabens of Canyonlands National Park, Utah, USA – integrating fieldwork, ground-penetrating radar and airborne imagery analysis M. Kettermann1, C. Grützner2,a, H. W. van Gent1,b, J. L. Urai1, K. Reicherter2, and J. Mertens1,c 1Structural Geology, Tectonics and Geomechanics Energy and Mineral Resources Group, RWTH Aachen University, Lochnerstraße 4–20, 52056 Aachen, Germany 2Neotectonics and Natural Hazards, RWTH Aachen University, Lochnerstraße 4–20, 52056 Aachen, Germany anow at: COMET; Bullard Laboratories, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK bnow at: Shell Global Solutions International, Rijswijk, the Netherlands cnow at: ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland Correspondence to: M. Kettermann ([email protected]) Received: 20 February 2015 – Published in Solid Earth Discuss.: 17 March 2015 Revised: 18 June 2015 – Accepted: 22 June 2015 – Published: 21 July 2015 Abstract. The grabens of Canyonlands National Park are 1 Introduction a young and active system of sub-parallel, arcuate grabens, whose evolution is the result of salt movement in the sub- Understanding the structure of dilatant fractures in normal surface and a slight regional tilt of the faulted strata. We fault zones is important for many applications in geoscience. present results of ground-penetrating radar (GPR) surveys Reservoirs for hydrocarbons, geothermal energy and fresh- in combination with field observations and analysis of high- water often contain dilatant fractures (e.g., Ehrenberg and resolution airborne imagery.
    [Show full text]
  • Faults and Joints
    133 JOINTS Joints (also termed extensional fractures) are planes of separation on which no or undetectable shear displacement has taken place. The two walls of the resulting tiny opening typically remain in tight (matching) contact. Joints may result from regional tectonics (i.e. the compressive stresses in front of a mountain belt), folding (due to curvature of bedding), faulting, or internal stress release during uplift or cooling. They often form under high fluid pressure (i.e. low effective stress), perpendicular to the smallest principal stress. The aperture of a joint is the space between its two walls measured perpendicularly to the mean plane. Apertures can be open (resulting in permeability enhancement) or occluded by mineral cement (resulting in permeability reduction). A joint with a large aperture (> few mm) is a fissure. The mechanical layer thickness of the deforming rock controls joint growth. If present in sufficient number, open joints may provide adequate porosity and permeability such that an otherwise impermeable rock may become a productive fractured reservoir. In quarrying, the largest block size depends on joint frequency; abundant fractures are desirable for quarrying crushed rock and gravel. Joint sets and systems Joints are ubiquitous features of rock exposures and often form families of straight to curviplanar fractures typically perpendicular to the layer boundaries in sedimentary rocks. A set is a group of joints with similar orientation and morphology. Several sets usually occur at the same place with no apparent interaction, giving exposures a blocky or fragmented appearance. Two or more sets of joints present together in an exposure compose a joint system.
    [Show full text]
  • FM 5-410 Chapter 2
    FM 5-410 CHAPTER 2 Structural Geology Structural geology describes the form, pat- secondary structural features. These secon- tern, origin, and internal structure of rock dary features include folds, faults, joints, and and soil masses. Tectonics, a closely related schistosity. These features can be identified field, deals with structural features on a and m appeal in the field through site inves- larger regional, continental, or global scale. tigation and from remote imagery. Figure 2-1, page 2-2, shows the major plates of the earth’s crust. These plates continually Section I. Structural Features undergo movement as shown by the arrows. in Sedimentary Rocks Figure 2-2, page 2-3, is a more detailed repre- sentation of plate tectonic theory. Molten material rises to the earth’s surface at BEDDING PLANES midoceanic ridges, forcing the oceanic plates Structural features are most readily recog- to diverge. These plates, in turn, collide with nized in the sedimentary rocks. They are adjacent plates, which may or may not be of normally deposited in more or less regular similar density. If the two colliding plates are horizontal layers that accumulate on top of of approximately equal density, the plates each other in an orderly sequence. Individual will crumple, forming mountain range along deposits within the sequence are separated the convergent zone. If, on the other hand, by planar contact surfaces called bedding one of the plates is more dense than the other, planes (see Figure 1-7, page 1-9). Bedding it will be subducted, or forced below, the planes are of great importance to military en- lighter plate, creating an oceanic trench along gineers.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Geology
    2 STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY Conventional Map A map is a proportionate representation of an area/structure. The study of maps is known as cartography and the experts are known as cartographers. The maps were first prepared by people of Sumerian civilization by using clay lens. The characteristic elements of a map are scale (ratio of map distance to field distance and can be represented in three ways—statement method, e.g., 1 cm = 0.5 km, representative fraction method, e.g., 1:50,000 and graphical method in the form of a figure), direction, symbol and colour. On the basis of scale, maps are of two types: large-scale map (map gives more information pertaining to a smaller area, e.g., village map: 1:3956) and small: scale map (map gives less information pertaining to a larger area, e.g., world atlas: 1:100 km). Topographic Maps / Toposheet A toposheet is a map representing topography of an area. It is prepared by the Survey of India, Dehradun. Here, a three-dimensional feature is represented on a two-dimensional map and the information is mainly represented by contours. The contours/isohypses are lines connecting points of same elevation with respect to mean sea level (msl). The index contours are the contours representing 100’s/multiples of 100’s drawn with thick lines. The contour interval is usually 20 m. The contours never intersect each other and are not parallel. The characteristic elements of a toposheet are scale, colour, symbol and direction. The various layers which can be prepared from a toposheet are structural elements like fault and lineaments, cropping pattern, land use/land cover, groundwater abstruction structures, drainage density, drainage divide, elongation ratio, circularity ratio, drainage frequency, natural vegetation, rock types, landform units, infrastructural facilities, drainage and waterbodies, drainage number, drainage pattern, drainage length, relief/slope, stream order, sinuosity index and infiltration number.
    [Show full text]
  • Chromium Chemistry in Natural Waters, Iceland Deformation Mechanisms in Martian Shergottites
    1414 Goldschmidt2013 Conference Abstracts Chromium chemistry in natural Deformation mechanisms in Martian waters, Iceland Shergottites HANNA KAASALAINEN1*, ANDRI STEFÁNSSON1, KACZMAREK M.-A.*12, GRANGE M.1, REDDY S.M.1, INGVI GUNNARSSON2 AND STEFÁN ARNÓRSSON1 AND NEMCHIN A.1 1Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Iceland, Sturlugata 1Department of Applied Geology, The Institute for Geoscience 7, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland, Research, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box (*correspondence: [email protected]) U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia 2Present address: Reykjavik Energy, Bæjarhalsi 1, 110 2Now at University of Lausanne, Institute of Earth Sciences, Reykajvik, Iceland UNIL Mouline, Géopolis, CH-1016 Lausanne, Switzerland Chemistry of Cr and Fe was studied in non-thermal and (*correspondence: [email protected]) geothermal waters in Iceland. Chromium (Cr) is typically present at low concentrations (<1 µg/l) in natural waters, but Nakhla and Zagami are both clinopyroxene-rich basaltic elevated concentrations have been observed in waters with shergottite, with some Fe-rich olivine. The microstructure, the low pH values, e.g. acid mine drainage, and in association preferred orientation of pyroxene using Electron Backscatter with industrial activities. Chromium occurs in two oxidation Diffraction (EBSD) method and the gochemistry are combined states, Cr(III) and (VI), these being characterized by different to study subsamples of both Zagami and Nakhla to decipher (bio)chemical behaviour and solubility. As Cr(VI) is known to deformation processes that have occurred on Mars. be toxic but Cr(III) an essential micronutrient, it is important Nakhla displays a granular texture, essentially composed to determine the two oxidations states. Iron (Fe) is known to of augite, fayalite, plagioclase and magnetite.
    [Show full text]
  • Tectonic and Geological Structures of Gunung Kromong, West Java, Indonesia
    International Journal of GEOMATE, Oct., 2020, Vol.19, Issue 74, pp.185–193 ISSN: 2186-2982 (P), 2186-2990 (O), Japan, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21660/2020.74.05449 Geotechnique, Construction Materials and Environment TECTONIC AND GEOLOGICAL STRUCTURES OF GUNUNG KROMONG, WEST JAVA, INDONESIA *Iyan Haryanto1, Nisa Nurul Ilmi2, Johanes Hutabarat3, Billy Gumelar Adhiperdana4, Lili Fauzielly5, Yoga Andriana Sendjaja6, and Edy Sunardi7 1-7Faculty of Geological Engineering, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia *Corresponding Author, Received: 12 May 2020, Revised: 29 May 2020, Accepted: 15 June 2020 ABSTRACT: The Gunung Kromong complex is a solitary hill which physiographically located within the Jakarta Coastal Plain Zone. The research is mainly formed of primary data from observations and measurements of all geological elements especially morphological aspects and geological structures to reveal the tectonic background and its relation to the oil seepage. Sedimentary rocks outcrops appear in the western part around the cement plant surrounded by well exposed of igneous rocks. Oil seepage, gas and hot springs are found in limestone which has high fracture intensity and at low elevation. The distribution of sedimentary rocks is not only controlled by the folds and fault structures but also influenced by the igneous rock intrusion. The alignment of the structure in West Palimanan is formed by steep slopes on dacite igneous rock which is concluded as fault scarp. There are found abundance of fault indications in the form of slickenside, fault breccias, millonites, drag folds and have high intensity of shear joint. The KRG-7, KRG-8 and KRG-9 observation points, a slickenside with the same plane was found but has different slicken line, each shows a thrust fault and normal faults.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis, "Structure and Evolution of the Horse Heaven Hills in South
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Michael Curtis Hagood for the Master of Science in Geology presented February 21, 1985. Title: Structure-and Evolution of the Horse Heaven Hills in South-Central Washington. APPROVED BY MEMBERS OF THE THESIS COMMITTEE: Marvin H. Beeson, Chairman Michael L. Cummings Gilbert T. Benson Stephen P. Reidel The Horse Heaven Hills uplift in south-central Washington con- sists of distinct northwest and northeast trends which merge in the lower Yakima Valley. The northwest trend is adjacent to and parallels the Rattlesnake-Wallula alignment (RAW; a part of the Olympic-Wallowa lineament). The northwest trend and northeast trend consist of aligned or en echelon anticlines and monoclines whose axes are gener- ally oriented in the direction of the trend. At the intersection, La 2 folds in the northeast trend plunge onto and are terminated by folds of the northwest trend. The crest of the Horse Heaven Hills uplift within both trends is composed of a series of asymmetric, north vergent, eroded, usually double-hinged anticlines or monoclines. Some of these "major" anti- clines and monoclines are paralleled to the immediate north by lower- relief anticlines or monoclines. All anticlines approach monoclines in geometry and often change to a monoclinal geometry along their length. In both trends, reverse faults commonly parallel the axes of folds within the tightly folded hinge zones. Tear faults cut across the northern limbs of the anticlines and monoclines and are coincident with marked changes in the wavelength of a fold or a change in the trend of a fold. Layer-parallel faults commonly exist along steeply- dipping stratigraphic contacts or zones of preferred weakness in intraflow structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Faulted Joints: Kinematics, Displacement±Length Scaling Relations and Criteria for Their Identi®Cation
    Journal of Structural Geology 23 (2001) 315±327 www.elsevier.nl/locate/jstrugeo Faulted joints: kinematics, displacement±length scaling relations and criteria for their identi®cation Scott J. Wilkinsa,*, Michael R. Grossa, Michael Wackera, Yehuda Eyalb, Terry Engelderc aDepartment of Geology, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA bDepartment of Geology, Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel cDepartment of Geosciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA Received 6 December 1999; accepted 6 June 2000 Abstract Structural geometries and kinematics based on two sets of joints, pinnate joints and fault striations, reveal that some mesoscale faults at Split Mountain, Utah, originated as joints. Unlike many other types of faults, displacements (D) across faulted joints do not scale with lengths (L) and therefore do not adhere to published fault scaling laws. Rather, fault size corresponds initially to original joint length, which in turn is controlled by bed thickness for bed-con®ned joints. Although faulted joints will grow in length with increasing slip, the total change in length is negligible compared to the original length, leading to an independence of D from L during early stages of joint reactivation. Therefore, attempts to predict fault length, gouge thickness, or hydrologic properties based solely upon D±L scaling laws could yield misleading results for faulted joints. Pinnate joints, distinguishable from wing cracks, developed within the dilational quadrants along faulted joints and help to constrain the kinematics of joint reactivation. q 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction impact of these ªfaulted jointsº on displacement±length scaling relations and fault-slip kinematics.
    [Show full text]
  • Deepwater Niger Delta Fold-And-Thrust Belt Modeled As a Critical-Taper Wedge: the Influence of a Weak Detachment on Styles of Fault-Related Folds
    Deepwater Niger Delta fold-and-thrust belt modeled as a critical-taper wedge: The influence of a weak detachment on styles of fault-related folds Frank Bilotti1, Chris Guzofski1, John H. Shaw2 1 Chevron 2Harvard University GeoPrisms Rift Initiation and Evolution Scientific Planning Workshop Niger delta “outer” fold-and-thrust belt very low taper Odd fault-related folds “Ductile” thickening Forethrusts and backthrusts in close proximity GeoPrisms Rift Initiation and Evolution Scientific Planning Workshop Outline • The nature of the toe of the Niger Delta • Basics of critical-taper wedge theory • The Niger Delta outer fold-and-thrust belt is at critical taper • Model parameters and results (high basal fluid pressure) • Applicability in 3D & subsequent work • Implications of high basal fluid pressure for contractional fault-related folds GeoPrisms Rift Initiation and Evolution Scientific Planning Workshop Niger Delta Bathymetry Slope fold-and-thrust belt deepwater fold-and-thrust belt GeoPrisms Rift Initiation and Evolution Scientific Planning Workshop Fold-and-thrust belts of the Niger Delta GeoPrisms Rift Initiation and Evolution Scientific Planning Workshop Regional Geologic Setting Inner Fold and Outer Fold and Thrust belt 1 i Thrust belt Detachment fold belt Extensional Growth Faults t 3250 Lobia-1 0 k m a 0 k m . l m p 4 m . numerouscr estal crestal growthfaults growth faults numerous growthfaults ? ( 3 ma ? mudd apir (?) ? 5 m P n i e i y R it u x c : e n d her s d 5 l 1 0 5 m l l i 2 5 mud diapr (?) 2 m N m s t i 5 k m velocty sag(?) 5 k m e 2 m a .5 ma s u i basal detachment a .0 i 5 a as e veoct y ag(?) velocty sag(?) .
    [Show full text]