Born of Fire, Possessed by Darkness: Mysticism and Australian Poetry
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Born of Fire, Possessed by Darkness: Mysticism and Australian Poetry by Toby Davidson, BA (Hons) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Deakin University June, 2008 Acknowledgements This dissertation was funded by a Commonwealth Government Australian Postgraduate Award (APA). I am particularly indebted to The School of Communication and Creative Arts at Deakin University (Warrnambool and Burwood) for its support, especially my principal supervisor Dr David McCooey and associate supervisors Dr Lyn McCredden and Dr Frances Devlin-Glass. I respectfully thank my markers Prof Amy Hollywood, Prof Peter Steele and Prof Bernadette Brennan for their diligence and feedback. I would also like to gratefully acknowledge Dr Meredith McKinney’s kind permission to cite our correspondence. The inception and development of this project owes much to a dedicated band of friends and associates: Dr John Leonard and Sister Veronica Brady for their receptivity and enthusiasm, Assoc Prof Daniel Brown and Prof Richard Bosworth for their early assistance, Mal McKimmie, Philip Salom and many, many others in the Melbourne and Perth poetry universes for kind words, strong instincts and bold suggestions, Dr Bronwyn Mellor for her editorial guidance, DJs Sasha, Digweed and Dr Simon Willis/Tigga for keeping me upbeat and functional. To all my friends across the country, thanks for knowing I could do it. This dissertation is dedicated to two families: the Davidson family, especially Gary and Barbara Davidson for their commitment to pretty much everything; and the Manypeney family, Frank and Nadia for their hospitality and finally to my partner Amanda, who has had to live this thesis and steady the ship in the various tempests of mystical poetries my mind and body brought home with me. Abstract This dissertation is structured around five Australian mystical poets: Ada Cambridge, John Shaw Neilson, Francis Webb, Judith Wright and Kevin Hart. It examines the varieties of Western Christian mysticism upon which these poets draw, or with which they exhibit affinities. A short prelude section to each chapter considers the thematic parallels of their contemporaries, while the final chapter critically investigates constructions of Indigeneity in Australian mystical poetry and the renegotiated mystical poetics of Indigenous poets and theologians. The central argument of this dissertation is that an understanding of Western Christian mysticism is essential to the study of Australian poetry. There are three sub-arguments: firstly, that Australian literary criticism regarding the mystical largely avoids the concept of mysticism as a shifting notion both historically and in the present; secondly, that what passes for mysticism is recurringly subject to poorly defined constructions of mysticism as well as individual poets’ use of the mystical for personal, creative or ideological purposes; thirdly, that in avoiding the concept of a shifting notion critics have ignored the increasing contribution of Australian poets to national and international discourses of mysticism. Contents Introduction: Working With Contested Traditions, Old and New i 1: Stately Dances and Shifting Notions: Defining Mysticism 1 2: Poetic Mystics, Mystical Poets: Tradition, Innovation and Influence 23 3: Ada Cambridge and the Lonely Seas 60 4: John Shaw Neilson: ‘Something of a Mystic’ 103 5: Francis Webb and the Search 152 6: Judith Wright, the Fire of Love and the Dark Star 214 7: Beyond Reach of Language: Kevin Hart 252 8: Mysticism Beyond the Poetics of Empire 301 Conclusion: At the Limits of the Thesis 348 Bibliography 352 Introduction: Working with Contested Traditions, Old and New In order to clearly demonstrate how an understanding of Western Christian mysticism is essential to the study of Australian poetry, the context and parameters of the research field, terminological considerations, acknowledgement of other mystical traditions and a chapter guide will first be outlined. Original Contribution to the Field Mysticism of any tradition can prove a precarious topic, subject to distortion and contradiction. With this in mind literary scholars might be excused for avoiding tropes and themes more comfortably consigned to the domain of theology. The problem for studies of Australian poetry is that major Australian poets do not subscribe to the same systematic avoidance. Ada Cambridge, John Shaw Neilson, Francis Webb, Judith Wright and Kevin Hart in particular have directly engaged and represented Western Christian mysticism and thematic parallels are discernable in their respective contemporaries Charles Harpur, Henry Kendall, Mary Fullerton, Zora Cross, Christopher Brennan, Lesbia Harford, James McAuley, Vincent Buckley, Roland Robinson, David Campbell, Robert D. FitzGerald, A.D. Hope, Gwen Harwood, Les Murray, Peter Steele, Miriam-Rose Ungunmerr-Baumann and Maisie Cavanagh. This spread of twenty-four poets—many canonical and recurringly anthologised—provides the impetus for the claim that an understanding of Western Christian mysticism, however elementary, is essential to the study of Australian poetry. With some poets this understanding may be limited to certain mystical figures, imageries or themes. For others, it encompasses a deeper, abiding, transformative relationship variously incorporating the metaphysics and poetics of Introduction: Working with Contested Traditions, Old and New ii land, the inexpressible, inner journeys and contemplations of spiritual progression towards the divine. This deeper relationship can be found in each of the five selected poets and this is why they constitute the central foci of this thesis. Australian poetry critics have not always avoided the topic of Western Christian mysticism in Australian poetry per se, but Australian criticism engaging the mystical typically contains three major oversights this thesis seeks to address. The first of these is a failure to disclose or construct a definition for ‘mystical’ or ‘mysticism’, which is the task of Chapter 1. The second is a failure to contextualise how the mystical is demonstrated or expressed and by whom. One critic might be influenced by Platonic or biblical sources, another the Catholic saints, another solely English mystical poets, another recent mysticism scholarship, yet there is often no way to determine the full extent or effects of such biases. Chapter 2 of this thesis contextualises its argument by exploring ancient and modern innovators in Western mystical poetics. The third critical oversight lies in the lack of recognition of mysticism as a shifting notion (whereby what is considered mystical in 1900 may not be so in 1999) and related lines of continuity and cross-influence across multiple, intergenerational poetries. While this may be symptomatic of the larger educational disregard for the mystical noted by Hart in Chapter 7, it nonetheless compares poorly to international scholarship. Notable works with no corresponding Australian examples include Nicholson and Lee’s The Oxford Book of English Mystical Verse (1917), Eliot’s 1926 Clark Lectures which appear in The Varieties of Metaphysical Poetry (1993), Cohen’s The Ryder Book of Mystical Verse (1983) and Paranjape’s Mysticism in Indian English Poetry (1988). Australian poetry criticism is yet to broadly consider its own national tradition in mystical terms, a situation which belies the abundance of mystical tropes and themes in the work of Australian poets. This Introduction: Working with Contested Traditions, Old and New iii study seeks to address this long-standing impasse by asserting that an understanding of Western Christian mysticism is essential to the study of Australian poetry, that what critically passes for mysticism is era-specific, and that the critical failure to comprehend mysticism as a shifting notion has facilitated a lack of awareness of the increasing contribution of Australian poets to national and international mystical discourses. Which Mysticism? Practical Considerations The Western Christian mystical tradition has been selected for this study for practical rather than essentialist or evangelical purposes. Mysticisms of other traditions, including Indigenous, pagan, Vedic, Buddhist, Judaic, Islamic and Eastern Orthodox, are not examined here, although it is hoped this study may encourage further research, including from interfaith perspectives, into these traditions and their respective Australian mystical poetries. Even within this study’s parameters, there remain points of convergence. W.B. Yeats’s ‘Celtic Twilight’, for example, inspired Brennan, Neilson and Cross. The Islamic mystical influences of Omar Khayyam, Rumi and Hafiz of Shiraz can be found in Neilson and Wright. Hinduism (Brennan and Wright), Taoism (Wright) and Shintoism (Murray) are likewise evident. This study acknowledges the ancient and ongoing spiritual heritages of Indigenous Australia, and in accepting that its author is neither initiated nor authorised to comment on matters of Indigenous metaphysics, Law or ritual, will not expound any ill-defined ‘Indigenous mysticism’. Indigeneity in Australian mystical poetry is another matter, however, and this will be discussed, along with the challenges to Western Christian mysticism by Indigenous Christian poets and theologians, in the final chapter. Introduction: Working with Contested Traditions, Old and New iv Western Christian mysticism has been selected because it has proved recurringly attractive to Australian poets since the colonial era. As Rowland Ward