The Pivot of the World__By Blake Stimson.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Pivot of the World__By Blake Stimson.Pdf The Pivot of the World Photography and Its Nation Blake Stimson Frontispiece: Eadweard Muybridge, Movernent of tile Hand; Beating Time, ca. 1884­ 1887, detail of frame' 1, 2, 7, 8. Courtesy of George Eastman House, Rochester, N.Y. The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England © 2006 Massachusetts Institute of Technology For Louise All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. MIT Press books may be purchased at special quantity discounts for business or sales promotional use. For information, please e-mail [email protected] or write to Special Sales Department, The MIT Press, 55 Hayward Street, Cambridge, MA 02142. This book was set in Stone Sans and Stone Serif by SNP Best-set Typesetter Ltd., Hong Kong and was printed and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Stimson, Blake. The pivot of the world: photography and its nation / Blake Stimson. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISH ! 0-262-69333-X (pbk.) 1. Photography-Social aspects. 2. Photographic criticism. I. Title. TR183.S75 2006 770-dc22 2005051703 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Contents It is much more difficult to believe that the forms of thought which per­ Acknowledgments ix meate all our ideas-whether these are purely theoretical or contain matter belonging to feeling, impulse, will-are means for us rather than that we Prologue: Lost in the Middle serve them, that in fact they have us in their possession. What is there more in us as against them? How shall we, how shall I, set myself up as Introduction: The Photography of Social Form 13 more universal than they are? -G. W F Hegel, 1831 Photographic Being and The Family of Man 59 My body is the pivot of the world. 2 Photographic Anguish and The Americans 105 -Maurice Merleau-Ponty, 1945 3 The Photographic Comportment of Bernd and Hilla Becher 137 Epilogue: Art and Objecthood 177 Notes 189 Acknowledgments My first forays into this project on the 1950s were developed during the early days of my graduate study at Cornell University, only to be set aside for more focused attention on the art of the 1960s. I will return to the later period in studies to come but felt the need, first, to work out my under­ standing of its immediate prehistory, the last gasp of an older ambition before it gave up the ghost in order to be reborn as the new, in the finished form you hold here. With this project now complete, I continue to believe it fundamental to ground my understanding of the very forceful influence of the subsequent art-historical period marked so brightly and distinctly by pop art on one end and conceptual art on the other. During its brief life at Cornell, this project benefited in countless direct and indirect ways from, first and foremost, the learned, sensitive, and agile critical attention and support of Hal Foster. My thinking will be influenced forever by that attention. Susan Buck-Morss was also a constant inspiration and mentor and served as a reviewer of thiS project at its earliest stage. Other teachers who touched on or inspired the project in particularly important ways at Cornell were Emily Apter, Peter Hohendahl, and Eric Santner. So, too, the project would not be what it is without the rich exchanges among a small graduate student cadre of Hal's students: Helen Molesworth, Peter Brunt, Lawrence Shapiro, Frazer Ward, and Charles Reeve were all invaluable interlocutors and good friends. The research and writing of thiS project in its mature form was supported generously by the University of California Humanities Research Institute; the Clark Art Institute; research and publication grants from my home institution, the University of California, Davis; and the goodWill of my colleagues in the Art History Program. I am very grateful to David Theo Goldberg, Carrie Noland and the Gesture group in the first and to Michael x IAcknowledgments Ann Holly, Keith Moxey, Mark Ledbury, Gail Parker, and my colleagues in Prologue: Lost in the Middle the Spring 2004 research program at the second for their support and enthusiasm. Particularly valuable as well in ways both specific to this undertaking and more generally here at UCDavis have been ongOing spir­ ited conversations about shared concerns with Neil Larsen, John Hall, Benjamin Orlove, Clarence Walker, Douglas Kahn, and Simon Sadler. The ideas presented here in final form have been read or listened to and commented on generously and graciously by a greater number than could possibly be listed. Such responses have been invaluable to the development of the project, both because of the suspicions, concerns, critiques, and questions raised that helped me to better understand the limits and pOSSi­ Writing at the dawn of the 1960s, prominent American historian, veteran bilities of my own aims as well the simple affirmation that comes from an cold warrior, soon-to-be librarian of Congress, and aspiring public intel­ engaged audience or reader. This was so at all public venues but especially lectual Daniel]. Boorstin lamented the impact of photography on society. the case for lively audiences at University College, London, the Tate Modern He was concerned that photography's mechanically achieved democratiza­ (for which a version of chapter 3 has since been published), and the Clark tion of image making also served to cheapen and falsify both individual Art Institute. I am thankful in this regard particularly to Andrew Hemingvvay . and collective experience, both sense of self and sense of community. 'I As and his IIMarxism and the Interpretation of Culturell seminar, to Steve individuals and as a nation, we now suffer from social narcissism,u he Edwards and Dominic Willsdon at the Tate, and to the Clark leadership diagnosed in his popular book The Image or Whatever Happened to the already mentioned above. American Dream: uWe have fallen in love with our own image, with images Valuable readers and attentive critics of the manuscript in part or full of our making, which turn out to be images of ourselves.'I The problem, have included Alexander Alberro, Sherwin Simmons, Roger Rouse, and Gail he reasoned in the psychosociological language of his moment, was one Finney, who is publishing a version of chapter 3 in her Visual Culture in of boundary confusion or loss of differentiation between authentic and 20th-Century Germany: Text as Spectacle. The manuscript was also com­ inauthentic, self-generated and other-generated forms of representation. mented on generously and helpfully by two anonymous readers for MIT Ulmages,U on the one hand, and Uthe way we think of ourselves,u on the Press and by several more anonymous external readers for an academic other, he wrote, have ubecome mergedU and in so doing, the American review and by my thoughtful and supportive colleagues in the Art History dream of self-realization was squandered. The sheer glut of photographic Program at UCDavis. I am grateful to them all, as I am to two research imagery, its ease of production, and its centrality in cultural self­ assistants, Fauna Taylor and Rebecca Arnfeld. So too I am indebted to Roger understanding had overwhelmed identity by infecting it with the mechani­ Conover at MIT Press for his support of this project. cal qualities of the photographic process and thereby was draining it of Finally, I express special thanks to two friends who supported me with humanity. Full of period psychodrama and period ambivalence about mass undue grace during a personally significant stretch of this undertaking: culture, he declared that this shared pathology was Uthe monotony within Melissa Chandon and, already cited above for his intellectual contribution, us, the monotony of self-repetition. ul That alienated condition was born Neil Larsen. To both, as Neil likes to say, un abrazo. Most important of all, of the brute material, machine-enhanced fact of photography, he reasoned, this book is dedicated to my dear daughter, Louise. of the scary realization that we ulive willy-nilly in a world where every manu had been mechanically endowed with a new and disturbing capacity to be-of all things threatening-lihis own artist. u2 2 I Prologue Prologue I 3 This fear, of course, like the euphoric this-is-the-American-dream flip side generated by the ubiquitous and never-ending flood of snapshots, adver­ of the mass culture Boorstin was critiquing, is as old as photography itself, tisements, and other photographic documents, was thought to bear within but in the 1950s, it had a special, pressing currency. Photography's "deepest it the possibility of a new political identification, the possibility of a civic­ identification," as another critic put it at the time about mass culture more minded collective self-understanding that would generate a new postwar, generally, "rests largely on the least individualized and most anonymous postmodern citizen of the world. Ultimately, the promise of thiS condition aspects of ourselves." As a medium of representation, it was too flat, too was that, when exercised properly, it could be a means of salvation from quick and too easy, and thus the social identification it offered was based the horrors of the recent past and a means to prevent them from recurring. not on identity but instead on "dissociation of personality," on "social The goal was not so much a new, improved, transnational identity­ anonymity."l This heightened period perception of a loss produced by realized in a socially contracted ethic or shared vision of the past or photography is the subject of this book.
Recommended publications
  • Henryk Berlewi
    HENRYK BERLEWI HENRYK © 2019 Merrill C. Berman Collection © 2019 AGES IM CO U N R T IO E T S Y C E O L L F T HENRYK © O H C E M N 2019 A E R M R R I E L L B . C BERLEWI (1894-1967) HENRYK BERLEWI (1894-1967) Henryk Berlewi, Self-portrait,1922. Gouache on paper. Henryk Berlewi, Self-portrait, 1946. Pencil on paper. Muzeum Narodowe, Warsaw Published by the Merrill C. Berman Collection Concept and essay by Alla Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Design and production by Jolie Simpson Edited by Dr. Karen Kettering, Independent Scholar, Seattle, USA Copy edited by Lisa Berman Photography by Joelle Jensen and Jolie Simpson Printed and bound by www.blurb.com Plates © 2019 the Merrill C. Berman Collection Images courtesy of the Merrill C. Berman Collection unless otherwise noted. © 2019 The Merrill C. Berman Collection, Rye, New York Cover image: Élément de la Mécano- Facture, 1923. Gouache on paper, 21 1/2 x 17 3/4” (55 x 45 cm) Acknowledgements: We are grateful to the staf of the Frick Collection Library and of the New York Public Library (Art and Architecture Division) for assisting with research for this publication. We would like to thank Sabina Potaczek-Jasionowicz and Julia Gutsch for assisting in editing the titles in Polish, French, and German languages, as well as Gershom Tzipris for transliteration of titles in Yiddish. We would also like to acknowledge Dr. Marek Bartelik, author of Early Polish Modern Art (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005) and Adrian Sudhalter, Research Curator of the Merrill C.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms International 300 N
    THE CRITICISM OF ROBERT FRANK'S "THE AMERICANS" Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Alexander, Stuart Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 23/09/2021 11:13:03 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/277059 INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark, it is an indication of either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, duplicate copy, or copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed. For blurred pages, a good image of the page can be found in the adjacent frame. If copyrighted materials were deleted, a target note will appear listing the pages in the adjacent frame.
    [Show full text]
  • Collection 1880S–1940S, Floor 5 Checklist
    The Museum of Modern Art Fifth Floor, 1880s-1940s 5th Fl: 500, Constantin Brancusi Constantin Brâncuși Bird in Space 1928 Bronze 54 x 8 1/2 x 6 1/2" (137.2 x 21.6 x 16.5 cm) Given anonymously 153.1934 Fall 19 - No restriction Constantin Brâncuși Fish Paris 1930 Blue-gray marble 21 x 71 x 5 1/2" (53.3 x 180.3 x 14 cm), on three-part pedestal of one marble 5 1/8" (13 cm) high, and two limestone cylinders 13" (33 cm) high and 11" (27.9 cm) high x 32 1/8" (81.5 cm) diameter at widest point Acquired through the Lillie P. Bliss Bequest (by exchange) 695.1949.a-d Fall 19 - No restriction Constantin Brâncuși Mlle Pogany version I, 1913 (after a marble of 1912) Bronze with black patina 17 1/4 x 8 1/2 x 12 1/2" (43.8 x 21.5 x 31.7 cm), on limestone base 5 3/4 x 6 1/8 x 7 3/8" (14.6 x 15.6 x 18.7 cm) 17 1/4 × 8 1/2 × 12 1/2" (43.8 × 21.6 × 31.8 cm) Other (bronze): 17 1/4 × 8 1/2 × 12 1/2" (43.8 × 21.6 × 31.8 cm) 5 3/4 × 6 1/8 × 7 3/8" (14.6 × 15.6 × 18.7 cm) Other (approx. weight): 40 lb. (18.1 kg) Acquired through the Lillie P. Bliss Bequest (by exchange) 2.1953 Fall 19 - No restriction Constantin Brâncuși Maiastra 1910-12 White marble 22" (55.9 cm) high, on three-part limestone pedestal 70" (177.8 cm) high, of which the middle section is Double Caryatid, c.
    [Show full text]
  • Leseprobe 9783791385280.Pdf
    Our Bauhaus Our Bauhaus Memories of Bauhaus People Edited by Magdalena Droste and Boris Friedewald PRESTEL Munich · London · New York 7 Preface 11 71 126 Bruno Adler Lotte Collein Walter Gropius Weimar in Those Days Photography The Idea of the at the Bauhaus Bauhaus: The Battle 16 for New Educational Josef Albers 76 Foundations Thirteen Years Howard at the Bauhaus Dearstyne 131 Mies van der Rohe’s Hans 22 Teaching at the Haffenrichter Alfred Arndt Bauhaus in Dessau Lothar Schreyer how i got to the and the Bauhaus bauhaus in weimar 83 Stage Walter Dexel 30 The Bauhaus 137 Herbert Bayer Style: a Myth Gustav Homage to Gropius Hassenpflug 89 A Look at the Bauhaus 33 Lydia Today Hannes Beckmann Driesch-Foucar Formative Years Memories of the 139 Beginnings of the Fritz Hesse 41 Dornburg Pottery Dessau Max Bill Workshop of the State and the Bauhaus the bauhaus must go on Bauhaus in Weimar, 1920–1923 145 43 Hubert Hoffmann Sándor Bortnyik 100 the revival of the Something T. Lux Feininger bauhaus after 1945 on the Bauhaus The Bauhaus: Evolution of an Idea 150 50 Hubert Hoffmann Marianne Brandt 117 the dessau and the Letter to the Max Gebhard moscow bauhaus Younger Generation Advertising (VKhUTEMAS) and Typography 55 at the Bauhaus 156 Hin Bredendieck Johannes Itten The Preliminary Course 121 How the Tremendous and Design Werner Graeff Influence of the The Bauhaus, Bauhaus Began 64 the De Stijl group Paul Citroen in Weimar, and the 160 Mazdaznan Constructivist Nina Kandinsky at the Bauhaus Congress of 1922 Interview 167 226 278 Felix Klee Hannes
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Frank Memories 12/09/2020 — 10/01/2021
    Robert Frank Memories 12/09/2020 — 10/01/2021 Robert Frank, who was born in Zurich in 1924 and died last year in Canada, is widely regarded as one of the most important photographers of our time. Over the course of decades, he has expanded the boundaries of photography and explored its narrative potential like no other. Robert Frank travelled thousands of miles between the American East and West Coasts in the mid-1950s, going through nearly 700 films in the process. A selection of 83 black-and-white images from this blend of diary, sombre social portrait and photographic road movie would leave its mark on generations of photographers to come. The photobook The Americans was first published in Paris, followed by the US in 1959 – with an introduction by Beat writer Jack Kerouac, no less. Off-kilter compositions, cut-off figures and blurred motion marked a new photographic style teetering between documentation and narration that would have a profound impact on postwar photography. It is quite possibly the single most influential book in the history of photography; however, rather than being a spontaneous stroke of genius, Frank had worked on his subjective visual language for years. Many of his photographs from Switzerland, Europe and South America, as well as his rarely shown works from the USA in the early 1950s, are on a par with the famous classics from The Americans. The photographer’s early work, which remained unpublished for editorial reasons and is therefore little known to this day, reveals connections to those iconic pictures that still define our image of America, even today.
    [Show full text]
  • Picasso: Girl Before a Mirror
    PICASSO GIRL BEFORE A MIRROR ANNE UMLAND THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART, NEW YORK At some point on Wednesday, March 14, 1932, Pablo Picasso stepped back from his easel and took a long, hard look at the painting we know as Girl before a Mirror. Deciding there was nothing more he wanted to change or to add, he recorded the day, month, and year of completion on the back of the canvas and signed it on the front, in white paint, up in the picture’s top-left corner.1 Riotous in color and chockablock with pattern, this image of a young woman and her mirror reflection was finished toward the end of a grand series of can- vases the artist had begun in December 1931, three months before.2 Its jewel tones and compartmentalized composition, with discrete areas of luminous color bounded by lines, have prompted many viewers to compare its visual effect to that of stained glass or cloisonné enamel. To draw close to the painting and scrutinize its surface, however, is to discover that, unlike colored glass, Girl before a Mirror is densely opaque, rife with clotted passages and made up of multiple complex layers, evidence of its having been worked and reworked. The subject of this painting, too, is complex and filled with contradictory symbols. The art historian Robert Rosenblum memorably described the girl’s face, at left, a smoothly painted, delicately blushing pink-lavender profile com- bined with a heavily built-up, garishly colored yellow-and-red frontal view, as “a marvel of compression” containing within itself allusions to youth and old age, sun and moon, light and shadow, and “merging .
    [Show full text]
  • Artists' Books : a Critical Anthology and Sourcebook
    Anno 1778 PHILLIPS ACADEMY OLIVER-WENDELL-HOLMES % LI B R ARY 3 #...A _ 3 i^per ampUcm ^ -A ag alticrxi ' JZ ^ # # # # >%> * j Gift of Mark Rudkin Artists' Books: A Critical Anthology and Sourcebook ARTISTS’ A Critical Anthology Edited by Joan Lyons Gibbs M. Smith, Inc. Peregrine Smith Books BOOKS and Sourcebook in association with Visual Studies Workshop Press n Grateful acknowledgement is made to the publications in which the following essays first appeared: “Book Art,” by Richard Kostelanetz, reprinted, revised from Wordsand, RfC Editions, 1978; “The New Art of Making Books,” by Ulises Carrion, in Second Thoughts, Amsterdam: VOID Distributors, 1980; “The Artist’s Book Goes Public,” by Lucy R. Lippard, in Art in America 65, no. 1 (January-February 1977); “The Page as Al¬ ternative Space: 1950 to 1969,” by Barbara Moore and Jon Hendricks, in Flue, New York: Franklin Furnace (December 1980), as an adjunct to an exhibition of the same name; “The Book Stripped Bare,” by Susi R. Bloch, in The Book Stripped Bare, Hempstead, New York: The Emily Lowe Gallery and the Hofstra University Library, 1973, catalogue to an exhibition of books from the Arthur Cohen and Elaine Lustig col¬ lection supplemented by the collection of the Hofstra Fine Arts Library. Copyright © Visual Studies Workshop, 1985. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Except in the case of brief quotations in reviews and critical articles, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproduction in Lee Friedlander's Early Photobooks
    Emily H. Cohen Arbus, Friedlander, Winogrand Spring 2014 Professor Slifkin “Beautiful to Open and Pleasurable to Leaf Through:”1 The Art and Craft of Reproduction in Lee Friedlander’s Early Photobooks In the 1970s, a photomechanical reproduction revolution was underway as printers, such as Richard Benson of the Meridan Gravure Company in Connecticut, were experimenting with methods to translate the tonal complexities of silver gelatin photographs into ink on paper. In doing so, they would further the role of photobooks as an important component of modern photography. Photographer Lee Friedlander had been shooting film since the 1950s, but it was not until the ‘70s that he became interested in putting his work into book format. For his first solo book project, Self Portrait, he was teamed up with Benson, and as a collaborative team they helped revolutionize offset lithographic printing for the world of photography. Friedlander has prolifically produced photobooks ever since, and his output raises questions about the nature of reproduction, the role of craft in the art of photographs in ink, and how the book format necessarily changes the viewing experience for photography. When photographs are brought together as a collection, they resonate with each other, providing additional information and meaning for each individual image; the whole is greater 1 Parr, 4. “The combination of remarkable images and good design in a book that is beautiful to open and pleasurable to leaf through is an ideal way of conveying a photographer’s ideas and statements.” Cohen, "2 than the sum of its parts. This notion, according to Peter Galassi in his essay for Friedlander’s 2004 monograph publication, is fundamental to modern photography: “Considered one by one, some of the pictures are inevitably better than others, but the sense of the whole depends upon the profusion of its parts.”2 To further the connection, photographs can be literally bound together as pages of a photobook; the physical connection makes the collective meaning paramount.
    [Show full text]
  • We Interview Luis Rojas Marcos Art PÉREZ SIQUIER
    la fundación Fundación MAPFRE magazine#49 December 2019 www.fundacionmapfre.org We interview Luis Rojas Marcos Art PÉREZ SIQUIER Social Innovation PRESENTATION OF THE FUNDACIÓN MAPFRE SOCIAL INNOVATION AWARDS Road Safety THE LOOK BOTH WAYS CAMPAIGN LAUNCHED IN BOSTON Health Watch THE MILLENNIALS AND HEALTH VISITA NUESTRAS EXPOSICIONES VISIT OUR EXHIBITIONS Giovanni Boldini BOLDINI Y LA PINTURA ESPAÑOLA BOLDINI AND SPANISH PAINTING Scialle rosso [El mantón rojo], A FINALES DEL SIGLO XIX. AT THE END OF THE 19TH CENTURY. c. 1880 EL ESPÍRITU DE UNA ÉPOCA THE SPIRIT OF AN ERA Colección particular. Cortesía de Galleria Lugar Location Bottegantica, Milán Sala Fundación MAPFRE Recoletos Fundación MAPFRE Recoletos Exhibition Hall Paseo de Recoletos 23, 28004 Madrid Paseo de Recoletos 23, 28004 Madrid Fechas Dates Del 19/09/2019 al 12/01/2020 From 19/09/2019 to 12/01/2020 Horario de visitas Visiting hours Lunes de 14:00 a 20:00 h. Monday from 2 pm to 8 pm. Martes a sábado de 10:00 a 20:00 h. Tuesday to Saturday from 10 am to 8 pm. Domingos y festivos de 11:00 a 19:00 h. Sunday/holidays from 11 am to 7 pm. Acceso gratuito los lunes Free entry on Mondays Eamonn Doyle EAMONN DOYLE EAMONN DOYLE K-13 (serie irlandesa), 2018 Lugar Location Cortesía de Michael Hoppen Sala Fundación MAPFRE Fundación MAPFRE Gallery, Londres © Eamonn Doyle, cortesía Bárbara Braganza Bárbara Braganza Exhibition Hall Michael Hoppen Gallery, Londres Bárbara de Braganza, 13. 28004 Madrid Bárbara de Braganza, 13. 28004 Madrid Fechas Dates Del 12/09/2019 al 26/01/2020 From 12/09/2019 to 26/01/2020 Horario de visitas Visiting hours Lunes de 14:00 a 20:00 h.
    [Show full text]
  • Teil 1 – Beispiele Bis 1945
    Diagramme in der Kunst / Praktiken des Diagrammatischen in der Kunst Anmerkung: Für die ‚Diagrammatik der Kunst‘, scheint es mir (aufgrund der zu verstreuten Materiallage) noch zu früh zu sein. Anlaß Jahresthema 2013 – Im Vorfeld zur ‚Diagrammatik der Typographie‘ [email protected] Version 5.0 10.3.2013 Teil 1 – Beispiele bis 1945 Dank an: Dietmar Offenhuber, Astrit Schmidt-Burkhardt, Boris Nieslony, Dieter Mersch, Sybille Krämer, Nikolaus Gansterer, Paolo Bianchi, Gert Hasenhütl, Wolfgang Pircher, Thomas Thiel, Ruth Schnell, Renate Herter, das LBI, ars electronica team, Peter Weibel, OK team, Udo Wid, Rainer Zendron, Walter Pamminger, Kirsten Wagner, Karin Bruns, Thomas Goldstrasz, Monika Fleischmann, Philippe Rekacewicz, Lev Manovich, Karin Bruns, Sabine Zimmermann, Katja Mayer, Tim Otto Roth, Franz Reitinger, CONT3XT.NET, TransPublic Linz, servus Linz, Gitti Vasicek, Fadi Dorninger, Margit Rosen, Herbert W. Franke, Georg Ritter, Norbert Artner, Annamária Szöke, Laszlo Beke, Charles Kaltenbacher, Michael Rottmann, Josef Ramaseder Kontext: Tagung – Schaubilder – Bilder als Wissensmodelle http://www.bielefelder-kunstverein.de/veranstaltungen/schaubilder-bilder-als-wissensmodelle.html Vergleich dazu: Vortrag von Susanne Leeb (Merz Akademie Stuttgart): Die Diagrammatik der Kunst „Susanne Leeb stellte Theorien und Praktiken des Diagrammatischen in der Kunst vor, die zum Teil zum Zweck der Bildung von Gegeninformationen eingesetzt werden. Ausgehend von philosophischen Reflexionen über das Diagramm bei Gilles Deleuze und Felix Guattari
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibition Handout
    Balthasar Burkhard Part I (Fotostiftung Schweiz) 10.02.–21.05.2018 Early Photographs Balthasar Burkhard was just eight years old when his father With this major retrospective, Fotomuseum Winterthur gave him a camera to take along on a school excursion. and Fotostiftung Schweiz pay homage to the Swiss artist Burkhard himself describes this early experience with the Balthasar Burkhard (1944–2010). His oeuvre is almost un- camera as the starting point of his career. It was also his paralleled in the way it reflects not only the self-invention father who suggested an apprenticeship with Kurt Blum, one of a photographer, but also the emancipation of photo- of Switzerland’s foremost photographers, ranking along- graphy as an artistic medium in its own right during the side Paul Senn, Jakob Tuggener and Gotthard Schuh. Blum second half of the twentieth century. taught the young Balz, as he was nicknamed, all the finer points of darkroom technique as well as the art of large- Together, the two institutions chart the many and varied format photography. The earliest work from Burkhard’s ap- facets of Burkhard’s career, step by step. Fotostiftung pre- prentice years is a reportage of the school, in the form of a sents early works from the days of his apprenticeship with book, while his documentation of the Distelzwang Society’s Kurt Blum and his first independent documentary photo- historic guildhall in the old quarter of Bern was clearly a graphs. The exhibition also traces Burkhard’s role as a photo- lesson in architectural photography. Yet, no sooner had he grapher alongside the curator Harald Szeemann and captur- completed his apprenticeship than Burkhard was already ing images of Bern’s bohemian scene in the 1960s and 1970s.
    [Show full text]
  • RUNDBRIEF FOTOGRAFIE Undbrief Fotografie, Vol
    ISSN 0945-0327 Vol. 24 (2017), No. 2 [N.F. 94] RUNDBRIEF FOTOGRAFIE undbrief Fotografie, Vol. 24 (2017), No. 2 [N.F. 94] 2 [N.F. (2017), No. 24 Vol. undbrief Fotografie, R Analoge und digitale Bildmedien in Archiven und Sammlungen EIN BILD EIN BILD Michael Diers Gegenteil, jeder wird – und sei er noch so unscheinbar – ernst und Tische, Stühle und Schränke nicht als Requisiten fungie- genommen und in seiner Eigenart gewürdigt. Aus diesem ren, sondern vielmehr gemeinsam als Akteure in einem Stück wechselseitigen Vertrauen erwächst die über Jahre errungene auftreten, dessen Titelhelden das Licht und die Farbe sind und Sicherheit, immer den richtigen Standpunkt zu wählen und in welchem die (Belichtungs-)Zeit Regie führt. ZEIT/RÄUME den adäquaten atmosphärischen Ton zu treffen. Dass sich in In vielen Fällen kann man von einem zweifachen Selbst- Über die Schönheit als kritische Kategorie bei Candida Höfer den Bildern gelegentlich auch ein ironisches Augenzwinkern porträt sprechen: So wie sich die Räume häufig selbst bereits niedergelegt findet, ist Teil der Verabredung. Denn welche in den blitzblanken Terrazzo-, Marmor- oder Holzfußböden Räume, zumal wenn sie eine abwechslungsreiche Geschichte reflektieren, stellen sie sich geziemend auch vor der Kamera haben, sind ohne Fehl und Tadel, demnach ohne nachträgli- zur Schau; auf der Gegenseite künden die Bilder von der Auto- che Einbauten oder kuriose Zutaten, die sie in einem Detail rin, die durch ihre fotografische Arbeit kaum weniger augen- decouvrieren und ein wenig aus ihrem gravitätischen Gleich- fällig, wenn auch in der Regel persönlich unsichtbar, als stille gewicht bringen. Doch solch vorsichtige Kritik zielt nie auf Beobachterin und Gestalterin im Bild zugegen ist [1].
    [Show full text]