Multiple Infiltration and Cross-Species Transmission of Foamy Viruses

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Multiple Infiltration and Cross-Species Transmission of Foamy Viruses bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.18.423569; this version posted December 20, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Multiple infiltration and cross-species transmission of foamy viruses 2 across Paleozoic to Cenozoic era 1,† 1,2,† 1,2 1,* 3 Yicong Chen , Yu-Yi Zhang , Xiaoman Wei , Jie Cui 4 5 1 CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Virology & Immunology, Institut Pasteur of 6 Shanghai, Center for Biosafety Mega-Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 7 Shanghai 200031, China 8 2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 9 10 †These authors contribute equal to this work. 11 ∗Correspondence: [email protected] 12 13 Running title: Complex evolution of amphibian foamy viruses 14 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.18.423569; this version posted December 20, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 15 Abstract 16 Foamy viruses (FVs) are complex retroviruses that can infect humans and other 17 animals. In this study, by integrating transcriptomic and genomic data, we discovered 18 412 FVs from 6 lineages in amphibians, which significantly increased the known set 19 of FVs in amphibians. Among these lineages, salamander FVs maintained a 20 co-evolutionary pattern with their hosts that could be dated back to the Paleozoic era, 21 while, on the contrary, frog FVs were much more likely acquired from cross-species 22 (class level) transmission in the Cenozoic era. In addition, we found three distinct FV 23 lineages had integrated into the genome of a salamander. Unexpectedly, we identified 24 a potential exogenous form of FV circulated in caecilian, demonstrating the existence 25 of exogenous form of FV besides mammals. Our discovery of rare phenomena in 26 amphibian FVs has overturned our collective understanding of the macroevolution of 27 the complex retrovirus. 28 29 Importance 30 Foamy viruses (FVs) represent, more so than other viruses, the best model of 31 co-evolution between a virus and a host. This study represents so far, the largest 32 investigation of amphibian FVs and revealed 412 FVs of 6 distinct lineages from 33 three major orders of amphibians. Besides co-evolutionary pattern, cross-species and 34 repeated infection were also observed during evolution of amphibian FVs. 35 Remarkably, expressed FVs including a potential exogenous form were discovered, 36 suggesting live FVs could be underestimated in nature. These findings revealed the 37 multiple origin and complex evolution of amphibian FVs started from the Paleozoic 38 era. 39 40 Keywords: Foamy virus; Endogenous foamy virus; Expressed foamy virus; 41 Amphibian; Evolution; Cross-species transmission; Multiple origin; Repeated 42 infection 43 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.18.423569; this version posted December 20, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 44 Introduction 45 Retroviruses (family Retroviridae) have great medical and economic significance, as 46 some are associated with severe infectious disease or are oncogenic(1-5). Retroviruses 47 are notable as they occasionally integrate into the germline of a host and become 48 endogenous retroviruses (ERVs), which can be vertically inherited(6, 7). ERVs 49 generated by simple retroviruses are widely distributed in vertebrates(8-17). However, 50 complex retroviruses, such as lenti-, foamy- and delta-retroviruses, have rarely 51 appeared as endogenous forms. 52 53 Foamy viruses (FVs) (subfamily Spumavirinae) are complex retroviruses that exhibit 54 typical co-divergence with their host, providing an ideal framework for understand the 55 long-term evolutionary relationship between viruses and vertebrate hosts(18-21). 56 Exogenous foamy viruses are prevalent in mammals, including primates(18, 22), 57 bovines(23, 24), equines(25), bats(26), and felines(27). Vertebrate genomic analysis 58 first identified endogenous foamy viruses (EFVs) in sloths(28), then they were found 59 in several primate genomes(29-31). The subsequent discovery of EFVs and EFV-like 60 elements in fish and amphibian genomes indicated that foamy viruses, along with 61 their vertebrate hosts, have ancient origins(32, 33). Recently, the discovery of four 62 novel reptile EFVs and two avian EFVs demonstrated that FVs can infect all five 63 major classes of vertebrates(34-37). 64 65 Although substantial number of EFVs had been found across the evolutionary history 66 of vertebrates(28, 30, 38), to date, only a few of them have been found in amphibians, 67 mainly in salamander(32). Most importantly, no potential exogenous foamy viruses 68 have been found outside of mammalian host(32, 37). In this study, by integrating 69 transcriptomic and genomic data, we found >400 FVs of 6 novel lineages of foamy 70 viruses, which significantly increased the set of known foamy viruses in amphibians. 71 Several expressed FVs were revealed, with potential exogenous foamy viruses 72 discovered. Our work also provides novel insight into the early evolution of foamy 73 viruses. 74 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.18.423569; this version posted December 20, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 75 Results 76 Discovery and confirmation of foamy viral elements and expressed foamy viruses in 77 amphibians 78 We screen 19 amphibian genomes (Table S1) using a homologous-based stepwise 79 manner as described in the materials and methods section. This led to the discovery of 80 18 foamy-like ERVs in Spea multiplicate (Mexican spadefoot toad), 64 in Rhinatrema 81 bivittatum (two-lined caecilian), and 131 in Ambystoma mexicanum (axolotl) (Table 82 S2). The foamy-like elements in S. multiplicate showed high similarity with each 83 other. Such high similarity between copies has also been observed in foamy-like 84 elements in R. bivittatum. However, there were two distinct groups of foamy-like 85 ERVs in A. mexicanum that showed an average 64% identity with 99% coverage. 86 87 In order to discover any potential exogenous foamy viruses, we also searched all 88 available amphibian RNA-seq data in the transcriptome sequence assembly (TSA) 89 database. Notably, we also found 58 foamy-like RNA copies in Tylototriton 90 wenxianensis (Wenxian knobby newt), 131 in Taricha granulosa (Rough-skinned 91 Newt), and 10 in R. bivittatum. Homologous comparison with NviFLERV-1 showed 92 that all three groups of foamy-like viral copies harbored typical major coding regions, 93 i.e., GAG, POL and ENV, with an average similarity of 22%–76%. 94 95 To examine whether these viral elements belonged to the clade of foamy viruses, a 96 phylogenetic tree was inferred using the reverse transcriptase (RT) protein of 97 representative viruses from all of the genera of Retroviridae (Fig. 1 and Table S3). 98 Our RT phylogenetic tree revealed that novel viral elements found in amphibians were 99 grouped within the foamy virus clade (bootstrap value > 90), which confirmed that 100 they were indeed foamy viruses. In addition, these foamy-like viral elements could be 101 divided into three clades, where the viral elements found in different newts, including 102 previously identified NviFLERV, clustered together, while the viral elements found in 103 R. bivittatum and S.multiplicate both formed a monophyletic group, respectively. Also, 104 of note was that foamy-like ERVs in A. mexicanum divided into two clusters, bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.18.423569; this version posted December 20, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 105 indicating the existence of two lineages of EFVs in A. mexicanum. 106 107 Thus, in accordance with the nomenclature proposed for ERVs(39), the foamy-like 108 ERVs found in S. multiplicate and R. bivittatum were named ERVs-Spuma.n-Smu (n 109 = 1~18) and ERVs-Spuma.n-Rbi (n = 1~64), respectively. Additionally, two lineages 110 in A. mexicanum were designated as ERVs-Spuma.an-Ame (n = 1~104) and 111 ERVs-Spuma.bn-Ame (n = 1~18), respectively. Moreover, the expressed viral 112 elements found in T. wenxianensis, T. granulosa and R. bivittatum were then named 113 expressed NFVtwe.n (exNFVtwe) (n = 1~58), expressed NFVtgr.n (exNFVtgr) (n = 114 1~131) and expressed CFVrbi.n (exCFVrbi) (n = 1~10), respectively. 115 116 EFV and exFV genome characterization 117 14 ERVs-Spuma-Smu, 54 ERVs-Spuma-Rbi, 57 ERVs-Spuma.a-Ame and 15 118 ERVs-Spuma.b-Ame, which were long (> 5 kb in length) were retrieved from their 119 respective genomes, and they were used to construct a consensus sequences for each 120 EFV lineage (Fig. 2A and Data set S1). The consensus genomes of novel EFVs all 121 harbored long pairwise LTRs and exhibited typical foamy virus structure, containing 122 three major genes, GAG, POL, and ENV, and one (ERV-Spuma-Rbi) or two 123 (ERVs-Spuma-Smu, ERVs-Spuma.a-Ame and ERVs-Spuma.b-Ame) putative 124 accessory genes. It is noteworthy that these accessory genes all showed no similarity 125 to any known proteins. By searching against the Conserved Domain Database (CDD) 126 using CD-Search, we were able to identify two typical foamy virus conserved 127 domains in all four consensus EFVs: (1) the Gag_spuma super family domain 128 (cl26624)(40, 41) and the (2) Foamy_virus_ENV super family domain (cl04051)(38).
Recommended publications
  • The Viruses of Vervet Monkeys and of Baboons in South Africa
    THE VIRUSES OF VERVET MONKEYS AND OF BABOONS IN SOUTH AFRICA Hubert Henri Malherbe A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Medicine University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg for the Degree of Doctor of Medicine Johannesburg 1974 11 ABSTRACT In this thesis are presented briefly the results of studies extending over the period 1955 to 1974. The use of vervet monkeys in South Africa for the production and testing of poliomyelitis vaccine made acquaintance with their viruses inevitable; and the subsequent introduction of the baboon as a laboratory animal of major importance also necessitates a knowledge of its viral flora. Since 1934 when Sabin and Wright described the B Virus which was recovered from a fatal human infection contracted as the result of a macaque monkey bite, numerous viral agents have been isolated from monkeys and baboons. In the United States of America, Dr. Robert N. Hull initiated the classification of simian viruses in an SV (for Simian Virus) series according to cytopathic effects as seen in unstained infected tissue cultures. In South Africa, viruses recovered from monkeys and baboons were designated numerically in an SA (for Simian Agent) series on the basis of cytopathic changes seen in stained preparations of infected cells. Integration of these two series is in progress. Simian viruses in South Africa have been recovered mainly through the inoculation of tissue cultures with material obtained by means of throat and rectal swabs, and also through the unmasking of latent agents present in kidney cells prepared as tissue cultures. Some evidence concerning viral activity has been derived from serological tests.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Emerging Infectious Diseases on Amphibians: a Review of Experimental Studies
    diversity Review Effects of Emerging Infectious Diseases on Amphibians: A Review of Experimental Studies Andrew R. Blaustein 1,*, Jenny Urbina 2 ID , Paul W. Snyder 1, Emily Reynolds 2 ID , Trang Dang 1 ID , Jason T. Hoverman 3 ID , Barbara Han 4 ID , Deanna H. Olson 5 ID , Catherine Searle 6 ID and Natalie M. Hambalek 1 1 Department of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA; [email protected] (P.W.S.); [email protected] (T.D.); [email protected] (N.M.H.) 2 Environmental Sciences Graduate Program, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA; [email protected] (J.U.); [email protected] (E.R.) 3 Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA; [email protected] 4 Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, New York, NY 12545, USA; [email protected] 5 US Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA; [email protected] 6 Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence [email protected]; Tel.: +1-541-737-5356 Received: 25 May 2018; Accepted: 27 July 2018; Published: 4 August 2018 Abstract: Numerous factors are contributing to the loss of biodiversity. These include complex effects of multiple abiotic and biotic stressors that may drive population losses. These losses are especially illustrated by amphibians, whose populations are declining worldwide. The causes of amphibian population declines are multifaceted and context-dependent. One major factor affecting amphibian populations is emerging infectious disease. Several pathogens and their associated diseases are especially significant contributors to amphibian population declines.
    [Show full text]
  • The Expression of Human Endogenous Retroviruses Is Modulated by the Tat Protein of HIV‐1
    The Expression of Human Endogenous Retroviruses is modulated by the Tat protein of HIV‐1 by Marta Jeannette Gonzalez‐Hernandez A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Immunology) in The University of Michigan 2012 Doctoral Committee Professor David M. Markovitz, Chair Professor Gary Huffnagle Professor Michael J. Imperiale Associate Professor David J. Miller Assistant Professor Akira Ono Assistant Professor Christiane E. Wobus © Marta Jeannette Gonzalez‐Hernandez 2012 For my family and friends, the most fantastic teachers I have ever had. ii Acknowledgements First, and foremost, I would like to thank David Markovitz for his patience and his scientific and mentoring endeavor. My time in the laboratory has been an honor and a pleasure. Special thanks are also due to all the members of the Markovitz laboratory, past and present. It has been a privilege, and a lot of fun, to work near such excellent scientists and friends. You all have a special place in my heart. I would like to thank all the members of my thesis committee for all the valuable advice, help and jokes whenever needed. Our collaborators from the Bioinformatics Core, particularly James Cavalcoli, Fan Meng, Manhong Dai, Maureen Sartor and Gil Omenn gave generous support, technical expertise and scientific insight to a very important part of this project. Thank you. Thanks also go to Mariana Kaplan’s and Akira Ono’s laboratory for help with experimental designs and for being especially generous with time and reagents. iii Table of Contents Dedication ............................................................................................................................ ii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................. iii List of Figures ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • And Giant Guitarfish (Rhynchobatus Djiddensis)
    VIRAL DISCOVERY IN BLUEGILL SUNFISH (LEPOMIS MACROCHIRUS) AND GIANT GUITARFISH (RHYNCHOBATUS DJIDDENSIS) BY HISTOPATHOLOGY EVALUATION, METAGENOMIC ANALYSIS AND NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING by JENNIFER ANNE DILL (Under the Direction of Alvin Camus) ABSTRACT The rapid growth of aquaculture production and international trade in live fish has led to the emergence of many new diseases. The introduction of novel disease agents can result in significant economic losses, as well as threats to vulnerable wild fish populations. Losses are often exacerbated by a lack of agent identification, delay in the development of diagnostic tools and poor knowledge of host range and susceptibility. Examples in bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) and the giant guitarfish (Rhynchobatus djiddensis) will be discussed here. Bluegill are popular freshwater game fish, native to eastern North America, living in shallow lakes, ponds, and slow moving waterways. Bluegill experiencing epizootics of proliferative lip and skin lesions, characterized by epidermal hyperplasia, papillomas, and rarely squamous cell carcinoma, were investigated in two isolated poopulations. Next generation genomic sequencing revealed partial DNA sequences of an endogenous retrovirus and the entire circular genome of a novel hepadnavirus. Giant Guitarfish, a rajiform elasmobranch listed as ‘vulnerable’ on the IUCN Red List, are found in the tropical Western Indian Ocean. Proliferative skin lesions were observed on the ventrum and caudal fin of a juvenile male quarantined at a public aquarium following international shipment. Histologically, lesions consisted of papillomatous epidermal hyperplasia with myriad large, amphophilic, intranuclear inclusions. Deep sequencing and metagenomic analysis produced the complete genomes of two novel DNA viruses, a typical polyomavirus and a second unclassified virus with a 20 kb genome tentatively named Colossomavirus.
    [Show full text]
  • VMC 321: Systematic Veterinary Virology Retroviridae Retro: from Latin Retro,"Backwards”
    VMC 321: Systematic Veterinary Virology Retroviridae Retro: from Latin retro,"backwards” - refers to the activity of reverse RETROVIRIDAE transcriptase and the transfer of genetic information from RNA to DNA. Retroviruses Viral RNA Viral DNA Viral mRNA, genome (integrated into host genome) Reverse (retro) transfer of genetic information Usually, well adapted to their hosts Endogenous retroviruses • RNA viruses • single stranded, positive sense, enveloped, icosahedral. • Distinguished from all other RNA viruses by presence of an unusual enzyme, reverse transcriptase. Retroviruses • Retro = reversal • RNA is serving as a template for DNA synthesis. • One genera of veterinary interest • Alpharetrovirus • • Family - Retroviridae • Subfamily - Orthoretrovirinae [Ortho: from Greek orthos"straight" • Genus -. Alpharetrovirus • Genus - Betaretrovirus Family- • Genus - Gammaretrovirus • Genus - Deltaretrovirus Retroviridae • Genus - Lentivirus [ Lenti: from Latin lentus, "slow“ ]. • Genus - Epsilonretrovirus • Subfamily - Spumaretrovirinae • Genus - Spumavirus Retroviridae • Subfamily • Orthoretrovirinae • Genus • Alpharetrovirus Alpharetrovirus • Species • Avian leukosis virus(ALV) • Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) • Avian myeloblastosis virus (AMV) • Fujinami sarcoma virus (FuSV) • ALVs have been divided into 10 envelope subgroups - A , B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I & J based on • host range Avian • receptor interference patterns • neutralization by antibodies leukosis- • subgroup A to E viruses have been divided into two groups sarcoma • Noncytopathic (A, C, and E) • Cytopathic (B and D) virus (ALV) • Cytopathic ALVs can cause a transient cytotoxicity in 30- 40% of the infected cells 1. The viral envelope formed from host cell membrane; contains 72 spiked knobs. 2. These consist of a transmembrane protein TM (gp 41), which is linked to surface protein SU (gp 120) that binds to a cell receptor during infection. 3. The virion has cone-shaped, icosahedral core, Structure containing the major capsid protein 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spemann Organizer Meets the Anterior‐
    The Japanese Society of Developmental Biologists Develop. Growth Differ. (2015) 57, 218–231 doi: 10.1111/dgd.12200 Original Article The Spemann organizer meets the anterior-most neuroectoderm at the equator of early gastrulae in amphibian species Takanori Yanagi,1,2† Kenta Ito,1,2† Akiha Nishihara,1† Reika Minamino,1,2 Shoko Mori,1 Masayuki Sumida3 and Chikara Hashimoto1,2* 1JT Biohistory Research Hall, 1-1 Murasaki-cho, Takatsuki, Osaka 569-1125, 2Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, and 3Institute for Amphibian Biology, Hiroshima University, Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan The dorsal blastopore lip (known as the Spemann organizer) is important for making the body plan in amphibian gastrulation. The organizer is believed to involute inward and migrate animally to make physical contact with the prospective head neuroectoderm at the blastocoel roof of mid- to late-gastrula. However, we found that this physical contact was already established at the equatorial region of very early gastrula in a wide variety of amphibian species. Here we propose a unified model of amphibian gastrulation movement. In the model, the organizer is present at the blastocoel roof of blastulae, moves vegetally to locate at the region that lies from the blastocoel floor to the dorsal lip at the onset of gastrulation. The organizer located at the blastocoel floor con- tributes to the anterior axial mesoderm including the prechordal plate, and the organizer at the dorsal lip ends up as the posterior axial mesoderm. During the early step of gastrulation, the anterior organizer moves to estab- lish the physical contact with the prospective neuroectoderm through the “subduction and zippering” move- ments.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5
    Summary Report of Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5 Summary Report of Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5 Prepared by: Amy J. Benson, Colette C. Jacono, Pam L. Fuller, Elizabeth R. McKercher, U.S. Geological Survey 7920 NW 71st Street Gainesville, Florida 32653 and Myriah M. Richerson Johnson Controls World Services, Inc. 7315 North Atlantic Avenue Cape Canaveral, FL 32920 Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 4401 North Fairfax Drive Arlington, VA 22203 29 February 2004 Table of Contents Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………... ...1 Aquatic Macrophytes ………………………………………………………………….. ... 2 Submersed Plants ………...………………………………………………........... 7 Emergent Plants ………………………………………………………….......... 13 Floating Plants ………………………………………………………………..... 24 Fishes ...…………….…………………………………………………………………..... 29 Invertebrates…………………………………………………………………………...... 56 Mollusks …………………………………………………………………………. 57 Bivalves …………….………………………………………………........ 57 Gastropods ……………………………………………………………... 63 Nudibranchs ………………………………………………………......... 68 Crustaceans …………………………………………………………………..... 69 Amphipods …………………………………………………………….... 69 Cladocerans …………………………………………………………..... 70 Copepods ……………………………………………………………….. 71 Crabs …………………………………………………………………...... 72 Crayfish ………………………………………………………………….. 73 Isopods ………………………………………………………………...... 75 Shrimp ………………………………………………………………….... 75 Amphibians and Reptiles …………………………………………………………….. 76 Amphibians ……………………………………………………………….......... 81 Toads and Frogs
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Analysis of the Complete Genome of a Simian Foamy Virus Infecting Hylobates Pileatus (Pileated Gibbon) Reveals Ancient Co-Evolution with Lesser Apes
    viruses Article Molecular Analysis of the Complete Genome of a Simian Foamy Virus Infecting Hylobates pileatus (pileated gibbon) Reveals Ancient Co-Evolution with Lesser Apes Anupama Shankar 1, Samuel D. Sibley 2, Tony L. Goldberg 2 and William M. Switzer 1,* 1 Laboratory Branch, Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA 2 Department of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-404-639-2019 Received: 1 April 2019; Accepted: 30 June 2019; Published: 3 July 2019 Abstract: Foamy viruses (FVs) are complex retroviruses present in many mammals, including nonhuman primates, where they are called simian foamy viruses (SFVs). SFVs can zoonotically infect humans, but very few complete SFV genomes are available, hampering the design of diagnostic assays. Gibbons are lesser apes widespread across Southeast Asia that can be infected with SFV, but only two partial SFV sequences are currently available. We used a metagenomics approach with next-generation sequencing of nucleic acid extracted from the cell culture of a blood specimen from a lesser ape, the pileated gibbon (Hylobates pileatus), to obtain the complete SFVhpi_SAM106 genome. We used Bayesian analysis to co-infer phylogenetic relationships and divergence dates. SFVhpi_SAM106 is ancestral to other ape SFVs with a divergence date of ~20.6 million years ago, reflecting ancient co-evolution of the host and SFVhpi_SAM106. Analysis of the complete SFVhpi_SAM106 genome shows that it has the same genetic architecture as other SFVs but has the longest recorded genome (13,885-nt) due to a longer long terminal repeat region (2,071 bp).
    [Show full text]
  • 10 International Foamy Virus Conference 2014
    10th INTERNATIONAL FOAMY VIRUS CONFERENCE 2014 June 24‐25, 2014 National Veterinary Research Institute, Pulawy, Poland Organized by: National Veterinary Research Institute Committee of Veterinary Sciences Polish Academy of Sciences Topics include: Foamy Virus Infection and Zoonotic Aspects, Foamy Virus Restriction and Immunity, Foamy Virus Biology and Gene Therapy Vectors http://www.piwet.pulawy.pl/ifvc/ Organizers Jacek Kuźmak and Magdalena Materniak Scientific Advisors Martin Löchelt and Axel Rethwilm Sponsors Support for the meeting was provided by the Committee of Veterinary Sciences Polish Academy of Sciences, ROCHE, Thermo Fisher Scientific and EURx Abstract book was issued thanks to the support provided by Committee of Veterinary Sciences Polish Academy of Sciences 2 Program Overview Monday, June 23rd, 2014 19 00 – 20 00 Registration 20 30 – open end Welcome Reception Tuesday, June 24th, 2014 9 00 – 9 30 Registration 9 30 – 9 45 Welcome 9 45 – 10 15 Arifa Khan (FDA, Bethesda, US) - Simian foamy virus infection in natural host species 10 15 – 10 45 Antoine Gessain (Institute Pasteur, Paris, France) – Zoonotic human infection by simian foamy viruses 10 45 – 11 20 Session 1 on Foamy Virus Infection and Zoonotic Aspects Chairs: Arifa S. Khan and Antoine Gessain 11 20 – 11 45 Coffee break 11 45 – 12 30 Session 1 on Foamy Virus Infection and Zoonotic Aspects Chairs: Arifa S. Khan and Antoine Gessain 12 30 – 13 00 Aris Katzourakis (Oxford University, UK - Mammalian genomes, their endogenous viral elements, and the evolutionary history
    [Show full text]
  • New Host Records for Lernaea Cyprinacea (Copepoda), a Parasite of Freshwater Fishes, with a Checklist of the Lernaeidae in Japan (1915-2007)
    J. Grad. Sch. Biosp. Sci. Hiroshima Univ. (2007), 46:21~33 New Host Records for Lernaea cyprinacea (Copepoda), a Parasite of Freshwater Fishes, with a Checklist of the Lernaeidae in Japan (1915-2007) Kazuya Nagasawa, Akiko Inoue, Su Myat and Tetsuya Umino Graduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University 1-4-4 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8528, Japan Abstract The lernaeid copepod Lernaea cyprinacea Linnaeus, 1758, was found attached to three species of freshwater fishes, the barbell steed Hemibarbus labeo (Pallas) (Cyprinidae), the dark chub Zacco temminckii (Temminck and Schlegel) (Cyprinidae), and the Amur catfish Silurus asotus Linnaeus (Siluridae) from Hiroshima Prefecture in Japan. The findings from Hemibarbus labeo and Zacco temminckii represent new host records for L. cyprinacea, while Silurus asotus is a new host in Japan. Based on the literature published for 93 years from 1915 to 2007, a checklist of three species of lernaeid copepods (Lernaea cyprinacea, Lernaea parasiluri, Lamproglena chinensis) from Japan is given, including information on the synonym(s), host(s), site(s) of infection, and distribution. The checklist shows that in Japan L. cyprinacea has been reported from 33 or 34 species and subspecies of fishes belonging to 17 families in 10 orders and also from 2 species of amphibians from 2 families in 2 orders. Key words: Lamproglena chinensis; Lernaea cyprinacea; Lernaea parasiluri; Lernaeidae; parasites; new hosts INTRODUCTION The lernaeid copepod Lernaea cyprinacea Linnaeus, 1758, often called the anchor worm, is a parasite of freshwater fishes in various regions of the world (Kabata, 1979; Lester and Hayward, 2006). The anterior part of the body of metamorphosed adult female is embedded in the host tissue, whereas the remaining body protrudes in the water.
    [Show full text]
  • Retroviruses:Retroviruses: Endogenousendogenous MLVMLV Andand XMRVXMRV
    Retroviruses:Retroviruses: EndogenousEndogenous MLVMLV andand XMRVXMRV JohnJohn M.M. CoffinCoffin TuftsTufts UniversityUniversity Tufts University Presented at the 1st Intl. Workshop on XMRV 7-8 September, Bethesda USA The Retrovirus Family Tree Virus Genus HFV Spumaretrovirinae bel1, bel2 MLV GammaretrovirusGammaretroviru FeLV HERV-C WDS Epsilonretrovirus orfA, orfB, orfC HIV-1 tat, rev HIV-2 Lentivirus EIAV VMV dut MPMV sag new env MMTV Betaretrovirus HERV-K IAP ASLV Alpharetrovirus BLV HTLV-1 Deltaretrovirus tax, rex HTLV-2 New Genes Presented at the 1st Intl. Workshop on XMRV At least 30 million years ago! 7-8 September, Bethesda USA EndogenousEndogenous RetrovirusesRetroviruses 1.1. Remnants Remnants ofof germgerm lineline infectionsinfections byby exogenousexogenous (infectious)(infectious) retroviruses.retroviruses. 2.2. BecameBecame fixedfixed inin thethe hosthost speciespecies.Somes.Some conferconfer protectionprotection againstagainst futurefuture infectionsinfections byby thethe samesame oror similarsimilar viviruses.ruses. AA fewfew othersothers havehave salutarysalutary effects.effects. 3.3. InheritedInherited likelike normalnormal genes.genes. 4.4. PresentPresent inin everyevery vertebratevertebrate andand manymany invertebrates.invertebrates. 5.5. CompriseComprise 6-8%6-8% ofof thethe humanhuman genome.genome. (More(More virusesviruses thanthan us).us). Presented at the 1st Intl. Workshop on XMRV 7-8 September, Bethesda USA EndogenousEndogenous RetrovirusesRetroviruses 6. Provide a fossil record of pathogen-host interactioninteraction unavailableunavailable inin anyany other system. 7. Can participateparticipate in evolutionary processescesses asas wellwell asas informinform usus aboutabout them. 8. Involved in disease in some animals. Humans? Presented at the 1st Intl. Workshop on XMRV 7-8 September, Bethesda USA XMRVXMRV 1.1. First First describeddescribed aboutabout 55 yearsyears agoago inin aa fewfew patientspatients withwith prostateprostate cancer.cancer. 2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Foamy Virus Biology and Its Application for Vector Development
    Viruses 2011, 3, 561-585; doi:10.3390/v3050561 OPEN ACCESS viruses ISSN 1999-4915 www.mdpi.com/journal/viruses Review Foamy Virus Biology and Its Application for Vector Development Dirk Lindemann 1,2,* and Axel Rethwilm 3 1 Institut für Virologie, Medizinische Fakultät ―Carl Gustav Carus‖, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany 2 DFG-Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden (CRTD)—Cluster of Excellence, Biotechnology Center, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany 3 Institut für Virologie und Immunbiologie, Universität Würzburg, 97078 Würzburg, Germany; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-351458-6210; Fax: +49-351-458-6310. Received: 7 March 2011; in revised form: 21 April 2011 / Accepted: 23 April 2011 / Published: 11 May 2011 Abstract: Spuma- or foamy viruses (FV), endemic in most non-human primates, cats, cattle and horses, comprise a special type of retrovirus that has developed a replication strategy combining features of both retroviruses and hepadnaviruses. Unique features of FVs include an apparent apathogenicity in natural hosts as well as zoonotically infected humans, a reverse transcription of the packaged viral RNA genome late during viral replication resulting in an infectious DNA genome in released FV particles and a special particle release strategy depending capsid and glycoprotein coexpression and specific interaction between both components. In addition, particular features with respect to the integration profile into the host genomic DNA discriminate FV from orthoretroviruses. It appears that some inherent properties of FV vectors set them favorably apart from orthoretroviral vectors and ask for additional basic research on the viruses as well as on the application in Gene Therapy.
    [Show full text]