Systematic Review of Important Viral Diseases in Africa in Light of the ‘One Health’ Concept

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Systematic Review of Important Viral Diseases in Africa in Light of the ‘One Health’ Concept pathogens Article Systematic Review of Important Viral Diseases in Africa in Light of the ‘One Health’ Concept Ravendra P. Chauhan 1 , Zelalem G. Dessie 2,3 , Ayman Noreddin 4,5 and Mohamed E. El Zowalaty 4,6,7,* 1 School of Laboratory Medicine and Medical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4001, South Africa; [email protected] 2 School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4001, South Africa; [email protected] 3 Department of Statistics, College of Science, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar 6000, Ethiopia 4 Infectious Diseases and Anti-Infective Therapy Research Group, Sharjah Medical Research Institute and College of Pharmacy, University of Sharjah, Sharjah 27272, UAE; [email protected] 5 Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA 92868, USA 6 Zoonosis Science Center, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, SE 75185 Uppsala, Sweden 7 Division of Virology, Department of Infectious Diseases and St. Jude Center of Excellence for Influenza Research and Surveillance (CEIRS), St Jude Children Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 17 February 2020; Accepted: 7 April 2020; Published: 20 April 2020 Abstract: Emerging and re-emerging viral diseases are of great public health concern. The recent emergence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) related coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) in December 2019 in China, which causes COVID-19 disease in humans, and its current spread to several countries, leading to the first pandemic in history to be caused by a coronavirus, highlights the significance of zoonotic viral diseases. Rift Valley fever, rabies, West Nile, chikungunya, dengue, yellow fever, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever, Ebola, and influenza viruses among many other viruses have been reported from different African countries. The paucity of information, lack of knowledge, limited resources, and climate change, coupled with cultural traditions make the African continent a hotspot for vector-borne and zoonotic viral diseases, which may spread globally. Currently, there is no information available on the status of virus diseases in Africa. This systematic review highlights the available information about viral diseases, including zoonotic and vector-borne diseases, reported in Africa. The findings will help us understand the trend of emerging and re-emerging virus diseases within the African continent. The findings recommend active surveillance of viral diseases and strict implementation of One Health measures in Africa to improve human public health and reduce the possibility of potential pandemics due to zoonotic viruses. Keywords: Africa; emerging; re-emerging; infectious diseases; pandemic; SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; virus; zoonosis; vector-borne; avian influenza; influenza A virus; coronaviruses; monkeypox; simian immunodeficiency; rabies; dengue; hemorrhagic fever; Rift Valley fever virus; West Nile virus; Ebola; one health; epidemiology 1. Introduction Africa is a large continent comprising 54 countries including some of the island nations within its geography. Various vector-borne and zoonotic virus diseases were reported from several African countries. Africa has a tropical climate, which enforces great diversity in its flora and fauna across the continent. The tropical climate, scarcity of resources, rampant poverty, and lack of knowledge coupled Pathogens 2020, 9, 301; doi:10.3390/pathogens9040301 www.mdpi.com/journal/pathogens Pathogens 2020, 9, 301 2 of 83 with cultural and traditional rituals and practices put many countries in the African continent at the edge of virus disease outbreaks. The high density of forest area and the tribes living within these forests mainly in west Africa, where human–animal conflicts are frequently encountered, put the communities at risk of disease progression and dissemination. One of the most challenging viruses, the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), was reported to be transmitted to hunter gatherers in the forests of west Africa after conflicts with non-human primates during hunting for bushmeat. The Pygmy and Bantu tribes living within the forests in Western Africa have witnessed rampant infections of HIV [1]. The Ebola virus disease outbreak remains a global challenge and has recently been reported from several west African countries. An Ebola outbreak in non-human primates (chimpanzee and gorilla) as well as in the human population was reported from west Africa between 1994 and 2002 [2]. During the current Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo, as of 4 March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) has identified a total of 3444 Ebola cases, including 3310 confirmed cases and 134 probable cases. A staggeringly high mortality rate of 65.74% was observed in Ebola cases, with 2264 deaths reported so far [3]. A total of 1169 survivors are still under active care in the Democratic Republic of Congo [3]. The incidence of animal–human conflict and the close proximity to wild animals in the African wilderness were thought to be the primary factors behind the disease progression; however, human-to-human contact is another crucial factor for further disease dissemination [2]. Monkeypox is another zoonotic viral disease with a high prevalence in west Africa. The dependence of the local population on bushmeat is one of the major driving factors behind the spread of monkeypox in west Africa. Apart from this, exposure to the body fluids of infected individuals is another mode of human-to-human transmission of the disease [4]. Other parts of Africa have also reported different zoonotic virus diseases, including Rift Valley fever (RVFV), Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHFV), West Nile virus (WNV) disease, avian influenza, and rabies among several other viral diseases [5–10]. Countries all over Africa have reported different avian diseases affecting domestic and wild birds. Avian influenza is one of the most widely distributed avian viral diseases, which causes great economic losses to the poultry industry and an incipient threat to humans in the entire of Africa. The involvement of wild birds and waterfowls in the spread of avian influenza is well proven [11]. Various species of waterfowls though notably those belonging to the orders of Anseriformes and Charadriiformes have been reported to be the reservoir of avian influenza viruses [12]. IAV infections in wild birds and poultry have been reported from several African countries, including South Africa [5,13–15]. A recent incidence of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV) in an ostrich farm located in Western Cape Province of South Africa almost decimated the ostrich industry in South Africa [16]. Migratory wild birds have been reported to be responsible for the long-distance dissemination of highly-pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV) subtype H5N1 [17]. Long-distance migration of wild birds is an important factor in the spread of avian influenza across the African continent [18]. Migratory waterfowls from European countries overwinter in the Rift Valley of Kenya, which is known as one of the favorite destinations of migratory birds for over-wintering [19]. The identification of a novel avian influenza virus H4N6 subtype from Kenya suggested that migratory water birds could act as a potential source of avian influenza transmission given that there was no earlier report of H4N6 subtype from the African continent [19]. Since influenza virus strains can cross the species barrier and therefore may emerge as new strains and recombination, they have a broader host range. It is suggested that the segmented nature of the influenza A virus genome may facilitate its evolution through re-assortment and mutation, and through these mechanisms, viruses would switch between hosts or find a new host and adapt or evolve in the new host [20,21]. Apart from poultry, swine farming is another large-scale industry in the African continent. The challenging aspect of swine farming is that swine are known to be a ‘mixing vessel’ for several viruses, including influenza viruses, which are reported to cause disease outbreaks in swine as well as in humans [20–23]. The evolutionary history of swine influenza viruses has been thoroughly investigated and reflects multiple introductions of these viruses into swine populations from other Pathogens 2020, 9, 301 3 of 83 species [24,25]. Pigs are reported to be susceptible to influenza virus infection with both human as well as avian strains of the virus, and most interestingly, have been reported to be an important host for virus ecology and interspecies transmission of the virus [26–28]. The 2009 swine influenza H1N1 virus pandemic is thought to have originated from the avian strain, which was introduced into swine and further transmitted to humans [20,23]. There are various reports available on the incidence of influenza viruses worldwide, but only limited information is available from the African continent. Influenza A virus has recently been reported from pigs in Kenya [29]. Interestingly, pigs have recently been reported to be infected with the HPAIV H5N1 subtype in Nigeria [30] and with the 2009 pandemic H1N1 virus in Nigeria, Ghana [31], Cameroon [32], and Togo [33]. Interestingly, swine were found positive for the HPAI H5N1 subtype and low pathogenic avian influenza virus (LPAIV) H9N2 subtype in Egypt during 2014–2015 [34]. Currently, there is no information available on the prevalence of influenza viruses
Recommended publications
  • Flavivirus: from Structure to Therapeutics Development
    life Review Flavivirus: From Structure to Therapeutics Development Rong Zhao 1,2,†, Meiyue Wang 1,2,†, Jing Cao 1,2, Jing Shen 1,2, Xin Zhou 3, Deping Wang 1,2,* and Jimin Cao 1,2,* 1 Key Laboratory of Cellular Physiology, Ministry of Education, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China; [email protected] (R.Z.); [email protected] (M.W.); [email protected] (J.C.); [email protected] (J.S.) 2 Department of Physiology, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China 3 Department of Medical Imaging, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (D.W.); [email protected] (J.C.) † These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: Flaviviruses are still a hidden threat to global human safety, as we are reminded by recent reports of dengue virus infections in Singapore and African-lineage-like Zika virus infections in Brazil. Therapeutic drugs or vaccines for flavivirus infections are in urgent need but are not well developed. The Flaviviridae family comprises a large group of enveloped viruses with a single-strand RNA genome of positive polarity. The genome of flavivirus encodes ten proteins, and each of them plays a different and important role in viral infection. In this review, we briefly summarized the major information of flavivirus and further introduced some strategies for the design and development of vaccines and anti-flavivirus compound drugs based on the structure of the viral proteins. There is no doubt that in the past few years, studies of antiviral drugs have achieved solid progress based on better understanding of the flavivirus biology.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Arboviral Handbook for Chikungunya, Dengue, and Zika Viruses
    ARIZONA ARBOVIRAL HANDBOOK FOR CHIKUNGUNYA, DENGUE, AND ZIKA VIRUSES 7/31/2017 Arizona Department of Health Services | P a g e 1 Arizona Arboviral Handbook for Chikungunya, Dengue, and Zika Viruses Arizona Arboviral Handbook for Chikungunya, Dengue, and Zika Viruses OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................................. 4 I: CHIKUNGUNYA ..................................................................................................... 5 Chikungunya Ecology and Transmission ....................................... 6 Chikungunya Clinical Disease and Case Management ............... 7 Chikungunya Laboratory Testing .................................................. 8 Chikungunya Case Definitions ...................................................... 9 Chikungunya Case Classification Algorithm ............................... 11 II: DENGUE .............................................................................................................. 12 Dengue Ecology and Transmission .............................................. 14 Dengue Clinical Disease and Case Management ...................... 14 Dengue Laboratory Testing ......................................................... 17 Dengue Case Definitions ............................................................ 19 Dengue Case Classification Algorithm ....................................... 23 III: ZIKA ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Innate Immunity Evasion by Dengue Virus
    Viruses2012, 4, 397-413; doi:10.3390/v4030397 OPEN ACCESS viruses ISSN 1999-4915 www.mdpi.com/journal/viruses Review Innate Immunity Evasion by Dengue Virus Juliet Morrison, Sebastian Aguirre and Ana Fernandez-Sesma * Department of Microbiology and the Global Health and Emerging Pathogens Institute (GHEPI), Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029-6574, USA; E-Mails: [email protected] (J.M.); [email protected] (S.A.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-212-241-5182; Fax: +1-212-534-1684. Received: 30 January 2012; in revised version: 14 February 2012 / Accepted: 7 March 2012 / Published: 15 March 2012 Abstract: For viruses to productively infect their hosts, they must evade or inhibit important elements of the innate immune system, namely the type I interferon (IFN) response, which negatively influences the subsequent development of antigen-specific adaptive immunity against those viruses. Dengue virus (DENV) can inhibit both type I IFN production and signaling in susceptible human cells, including dendritic cells (DCs). The NS2B3 protease complex of DENV functions as an antagonist of type I IFN production, and its proteolytic activity is necessary for this function. DENV also encodes proteins that antagonize type I IFN signaling, including NS2A, NS4A, NS4B and NS5 by targeting different components of this signaling pathway, such as STATs. Importantly, the ability of the NS5 protein to bind and degrade STAT2 contributes to the limited host tropism of DENV to humans and non-human primates. In this review, we will evaluate the contribution of innate immunity evasion by DENV to the pathogenesis and host tropism of this virus.
    [Show full text]
  • Uveal Involvement in Marburg Virus Disease B
    Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjo.61.4.265 on 1 April 1977. Downloaded from British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1977, 61, 265-266 Uveal involvement in Marburg virus disease B. S. KUMING AND N. KOKORIS From the Department of Ophthalmology, Johannesburg General Hospital and University of the Witwatersrand SUMMARY The first reported case of uveal involvement in Marburg virus disease is described. 'Ex Africa semper aliquid novi'. Two outbreaks of Marburg virus disease have been Rhodesia and had also been constantly at his documented. The first occurred in Marburg and bedside till his death. Lassa fever was suspected and Frankfurt, West Germany, in 1967 (Martini, 1969) she was given a unit of Lassa fever convalescent and the second in Johannesburg in 1975 (Gear, serum when she became desperately ill on the fifth 1975). This case report describes the third patient day. She also developed acute pancreatitis. Within in the Johannesburg outbreak, who developed an 52 hours she made a dramatic and uneventful anterior uveitis. The cause of the uveitis was proved recovery. Her illness mainly affected the haema- to be the Marburg virus by identiying it in a tissue topoietic, hepatic, and pancreatic systems. culture of her aqueous fluid. The subject of this report was a nurse who had helped to nurse patients 1 and 2. Nine days after the Case report death ofthe first patient she presented with lower back pain and high fever. She developed hepatitis, a mild Before describing the case history of the patient the disseminated intravascular coagulation syndrome, events leading to her contracting the disease must successfully treated with heparin, and the classical be briefly described.
    [Show full text]
  • Poxvirus and Rabies Branch (PRB) Fact Sheet
    Poxvirus & Rabies Branch (PRB) The epidemiologists, laboratory scientists, and public health professionals in PRB are responsible for surveillance, control, and prevention of illness and death due to poxviruses and rabies. Our Work Laboratory Reference, Diagnostics, & Training PRB’s provides laboratory reference, diagnostic services, and trainings to state and local health departments, the Department of Defense (DOD), international organizations, and the Laboratory Response Network (over 150 labs across the U.S. prepared to respond to bioterrorism). PRB collaborates with the private sector to develop and evaluate novel diagnostic assays, therapeutics, and vaccines for rabies and pox-related viruses. The branch maintains high-containment laboratories (BSL3 &4) to safely conduct public health research. Research & Surveillance PRB conducts research studies on the microbiology, molecular biology, pathogenesis (disease process), ecology, and evolution of Our Pathogens poxviruses and rabies. The branch monitors the incidence rates of PRB’s Poxvirus Team provides subject matter these diseases in the U.S. and internationally. expertise on: Expert Consultation Orthopoxviruses, including PRB provides consultation regarding poxvirus and rabies- Smallpox associated diseases and their diagnoses, prevention, control, and Monkeypox treatments. Assistance is offered to healthcare providers, academic Cowpox institutions, state and local health departments, other government Vaccinia Virus agencies, and the general public. PRB collaborates with non- governmental organizations to develop risk communication Parapoxviruses, including tools for disease prevention. The branch provides training on Orf Virus simple surveillance techniques and trains healthcare workers on monkeypox in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). PRB Pseudocowpox collaborates with the national government of Haiti on a rabies surveillance and control program which includes health education, enhanced diagnostics, surveillance, and an extensive dog vaccination campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • WHO Expert Consultation on Rabies WHO Technical Report Series N
    Since the launch of the Global framework to eliminate human 1012 rabies transmitted by dogs by 2030 in 2015, WHO has worked WHO Technical Report Series with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, the World Organisation for Animal Health, the Global 1012 Alliance for Rabies Control and other stakeholders and partners WHO to prepare a global strategic plan. This includes a country-centric approach to support, empower and catalyse national entities to Expert on Rabies Consultation control and eliminate rabies. In this context, WHO convened its network of collaborating centres on rabies, specialized institutions, members of the WHO Expert Advisory Panel on Rabies, rabies experts and partners to review strategic and technical guidance on rabies to support implementation of country and regional programmes. This report provides updated guidance based on evidence and programmatic experience on the multiple facets of rabies prevention, control and elimination. Key updates include: (i) surveillance strategies, including cross-sectoral linking of systems and suitable diagnostics; (ii) the latest recommendations on human and animal immunization; (iii) palliative care in low- resource settings; (iv) risk assessment to guide management of bite WHO Expert Consultation victims; and (v) a proposed process for validation and verification of countries reaching zero human deaths from rabies. on Rabies The meeting supported the recommendations endorsed by the WHO Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization in October 2017 to improve access to affordable rabies biologicals, especially for underserved populations, and increase programmatic feasibility in line with the objectives of universal Third report health coverage. The collaborative mechanisms required to prevent rabies are a model for collaboration on One Health at every level and among WHO multiple stakeholders and are a recipe for success.
    [Show full text]
  • Chikungunya Fever: Epidemiology, Clinical Syndrome, Pathogenesis
    Antiviral Research 99 (2013) 345–370 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Antiviral Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/antiviral Review Chikungunya fever: Epidemiology, clinical syndrome, pathogenesis and therapy ⇑ Simon-Djamel Thiberville a,b, , Nanikaly Moyen a,b, Laurence Dupuis-Maguiraga c,d, Antoine Nougairede a,b, Ernest A. Gould a,b, Pierre Roques c,d, Xavier de Lamballerie a,b a UMR_D 190 ‘‘Emergence des Pathologies Virales’’ (Aix-Marseille Univ. IRD French Institute of Research for Development EHESP French School of Public Health), Marseille, France b University Hospital Institute for Infectious Disease and Tropical Medicine, Marseille, France c CEA, Division of Immuno-Virologie, Institute of Emerging Diseases and Innovative Therapies, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France d UMR E1, University Paris Sud 11, Orsay, France article info abstract Article history: Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) is the aetiological agent of the mosquito-borne disease chikungunya fever, a Received 7 April 2013 debilitating arthritic disease that, during the past 7 years, has caused immeasurable morbidity and some Revised 21 May 2013 mortality in humans, including newborn babies, following its emergence and dispersal out of Africa to the Accepted 18 June 2013 Indian Ocean islands and Asia. Since the first reports of its existence in Africa in the 1950s, more than Available online 28 June 2013 1500 scientific publications on the different aspects of the disease and its causative agent have been pro- duced. Analysis of these publications shows that, following a number of studies in the 1960s and 1970s, Keywords: and in the absence of autochthonous cases in developed countries, the interest of the scientific commu- Chikungunya virus nity remained low.
    [Show full text]
  • Dengue Fever and Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever (Dhf)
    DENGUE FEVER AND DENGUE HEMORRHAGIC FEVER (DHF) What are DENGUE and DHF? Dengue and DHF are viral diseases transmitted by mosquitoes in tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Cases of dengue and DHF are confirmed every year in travelers returning to the United States after visits to regions such as the South Pacific, Asia, the Caribbean, the Americas and Africa. How is dengue fever spread? Dengue virus is transmitted to people by the bite of an infected mosquito. Dengue cannot be spread directly from person to person. What are the symptoms of dengue fever? The most common symptoms of dengue are high fever for 2–7 days, severe headache, backache, joint pains, nausea and vomiting, eye pain and rash. The rash is frequently not visible in dark-skinned people. Young children typically have a milder illness than older children and adults. Most patients report a non-specific flu-like illness. Many patients infected with dengue will not show any symptoms. DHF is a more severe form of dengue. Initial symptoms are the same as dengue but are followed by bleeding problems such as easy bruising, skin hemorrhages, bleeding from the nose or gums, and possible bleeding of the internal organs. DHF is very rare. How soon after exposure do symptoms appear? Symptoms of dengue can occur from 3-14 days, commonly 4-7 days, after the bite of an infected mosquito. What is the treatment for dengue fever? There is no specific treatment for dengue. Treatment usually involves treating symptoms such as managing fever, general aches and pains. Persons who have traveled to a tropical or sub-tropical region should consult their physician if they develop symptoms.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Taxonomic Update for Phylum Negarnaviricota (Riboviria: Orthornavirae), Including the Large Orders Bunyavirales and Mononegavirales
    Archives of Virology https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-020-04731-2 VIROLOGY DIVISION NEWS 2020 taxonomic update for phylum Negarnaviricota (Riboviria: Orthornavirae), including the large orders Bunyavirales and Mononegavirales Jens H. Kuhn1 · Scott Adkins2 · Daniela Alioto3 · Sergey V. Alkhovsky4 · Gaya K. Amarasinghe5 · Simon J. Anthony6,7 · Tatjana Avšič‑Županc8 · María A. Ayllón9,10 · Justin Bahl11 · Anne Balkema‑Buschmann12 · Matthew J. Ballinger13 · Tomáš Bartonička14 · Christopher Basler15 · Sina Bavari16 · Martin Beer17 · Dennis A. Bente18 · Éric Bergeron19 · Brian H. Bird20 · Carol Blair21 · Kim R. Blasdell22 · Steven B. Bradfute23 · Rachel Breyta24 · Thomas Briese25 · Paul A. Brown26 · Ursula J. Buchholz27 · Michael J. Buchmeier28 · Alexander Bukreyev18,29 · Felicity Burt30 · Nihal Buzkan31 · Charles H. Calisher32 · Mengji Cao33,34 · Inmaculada Casas35 · John Chamberlain36 · Kartik Chandran37 · Rémi N. Charrel38 · Biao Chen39 · Michela Chiumenti40 · Il‑Ryong Choi41 · J. Christopher S. Clegg42 · Ian Crozier43 · John V. da Graça44 · Elena Dal Bó45 · Alberto M. R. Dávila46 · Juan Carlos de la Torre47 · Xavier de Lamballerie38 · Rik L. de Swart48 · Patrick L. Di Bello49 · Nicholas Di Paola50 · Francesco Di Serio40 · Ralf G. Dietzgen51 · Michele Digiaro52 · Valerian V. Dolja53 · Olga Dolnik54 · Michael A. Drebot55 · Jan Felix Drexler56 · Ralf Dürrwald57 · Lucie Dufkova58 · William G. Dundon59 · W. Paul Duprex60 · John M. Dye50 · Andrew J. Easton61 · Hideki Ebihara62 · Toufc Elbeaino63 · Koray Ergünay64 · Jorlan Fernandes195 · Anthony R. Fooks65 · Pierre B. H. Formenty66 · Leonie F. Forth17 · Ron A. M. Fouchier48 · Juliana Freitas‑Astúa67 · Selma Gago‑Zachert68,69 · George Fú Gāo70 · María Laura García71 · Adolfo García‑Sastre72 · Aura R. Garrison50 · Aiah Gbakima73 · Tracey Goldstein74 · Jean‑Paul J. Gonzalez75,76 · Anthony Grifths77 · Martin H. Groschup12 · Stephan Günther78 · Alexandro Guterres195 · Roy A.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficacy of Vaccines in Animal Models of Ebolavirus Disease
    Supplemental Table 1. Efficacy of vaccines in animal models of Ebolavirus disease. Vaccines Immunization Schedule Mouse Model Guinea Pig Model NHP Model Virus Vectors HPIV3 Immunogens Guinea Pigs: Complete protection Complete protection HPIV3 ∆HN-F/ EBOV GP IN 4 x 106 PFU of HPIV3 with HPIV3 ∆HN-F/EBOV with 2 doses of [1] ∆HN-F/EBOV GP or GP, HPIV3/EBOV GP, or HPIV3/EBOV GP [3] EBOV GP [1-3] HPIV3/EBOV GP [1] HPIV3/EBOV NP [1, 2] No advantage to EBOV NP [2] IN 105.3 PFU of HPIV/EBOV Strong humoral response bivalent vaccines EBOV GP + NP [3] GP or NP [2] EBOV GP +GM-CSF [3] HPIV3- NHPs: 6 IN plus IT 4 x 10 TCID50 of HPIV3/EBOV GP, HPIV3/EBOV GP+GM-CSF, HPIV3/EBOVGP NP or 2 x 7 10 TCID50 of HPIV3/EBOV GP for 1–2 doses [3] RABV ∆GP/EBOV GP Mice: IM 5 x 105 FFU Complete protection with (Live attenuated) [4] either vector RABV/EBOV GP fused to EBOV GP incorporation into GCD of RABV virions not dependent on (inactivated) [4] RABV GCD Human Ad5 Immunogens Mice: With induced preexisting Ad5 With systemically CMVEBOV GP [5-9] IN, PO, IM 1 x 1010 [6] to 5 immunity, complete induced preexisting Ad5 CAGoptEBOV GP [8, 9] x 1010 [5] particles of protection with only IN immunity, complete Ad5/CMVEBOV GP Ad5/CMVEBOV GP [5] protection with IN IP 1 x 108 PFU With no Ad5 immunity: Ad5/CMVEBOV GP [8] Ad5/CMVEBOV GP[7] complete protection With mucosally induced IM 1 x 104–1 x 107 IFU of regardless of route [5-7, 9] preexisting Ad5 Ad5/CMVEBOV GP or 1 x Mucosal immunization Ad5- immunity, 83% 104–1 x 106 IFU of EBOV GP increased cellular
    [Show full text]
  • Your Child Or Family Member May Have Dengue Fever According to Their Clinical History and Physical Examination
    Your child or family member may have dengue fever according to their clinical history and physical examination. If it is dengue, serious complications of the disease can develop. If the complications are recognized early, and a doctor is consulted, it may save the patient’s life. Your doctor can order more tests to see if the patient needs to be hospitalized. The doctor can also order specific tests for dengue, but those tests will take longer than a week for the results to come back. How to Care for the Patient While They Have a Fever: Bed rest. Let patient rest as much as possible. Control the fever. Give acetaminophen or paracetamol (Tylenol) every 6 hours (maximum 4 doses per day). Do not give ibuprofen (Motrin, Advil) aspirin, or aspirin containing drugs. Sponge patient’s skin with cool water if fever stays high. Prevent dehydration which occurs when a person loses too much fluid (from high fevers, vomiting, or poor oral intake). Give plenty of fluids and watch for signs of dehydration. Bring patient to clinic or emergency room if any of the following signs develop: Decrease in urination (check number of wet diapers or trips to the bathroom) Few or no tears when child cries Dry mouth, tongue or lips Sunken eyes Listlessness or overly agitated or confused Fast heart beat (more than 100/min) Cold or clammy fingers and toes Sunken fontanel in infant DO WHILE THE PATIENT HAS FEVER DO WHILE THE PATIENT Prevent spread of dengue within your house. Place patient under bed net or use insect repellent on the patient while they have a fever.
    [Show full text]
  • Dengue and Yellow Fever
    GBL42 11/27/03 4:02 PM Page 262 CHAPTER 42 Dengue and Yellow Fever Dengue, 262 Yellow fever, 265 Further reading, 266 While the most important viral haemorrhagic tor (Aedes aegypti) as well as reinfestation of this fevers numerically (dengue and yellow fever) are insect into Central and South America (it was transmitted exclusively by arthropods, other largely eradicated in the 1960s). Other factors arboviral haemorrhagic fevers (Crimean– include intercontinental transport of car tyres Congo and Rift Valley fevers) can also be trans- containing Aedes albopictus eggs, overcrowding mitted directly by body fluids. A third group of of refugee and urban populations and increasing haemorrhagic fever viruses (Lassa, Ebola, Mar- human travel. In hyperendemic areas of Asia, burg) are only transmitted directly, and are not disease is seen mainly in children. transmitted by arthropods at all. The directly Aedes mosquitoes are ‘peri-domestic’: they transmissible viral haemorrhagic fevers are dis- breed in collections of fresh water around the cussed in Chapter 41. house (e.g. water storage jars).They feed on hu- mans (anthrophilic), mainly by day, and feed re- peatedly on different hosts (enhancing their role Dengue as vectors). Dengue virus is numerically the most important Clinical features arbovirus infecting humans, with an estimated Dengue virus may cause a non-specific febrile 100 million cases per year and 2.5 billion people illness or asymptomatic infection, especially in at risk.There are four serotypes of dengue virus, young children. However, there are two main transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes, and it is un- clinical dengue syndromes: dengue fever (DF) usual among arboviruses in that humans are the and dengue haemorrhagic fever (DHF).
    [Show full text]