Rousseau Samuel 2011 Memo

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rousseau Samuel 2011 Memo Université de Montréal Trois utopies au temps de la Révocation de l‟édit de Nantes : la vision de la France selon Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet (1627-1704), Pierre Jurieu (1637-1713) et Pierre Bayle (1647-1706). Par Samuel Rousseau Département d‟histoire Faculté des Arts et des Sciences Mémoire présenté à la Faculté des Arts et des Sciences en vue de l‟obtention du grade de Maître ès Arts (M.A.) en histoire Juin 2011 © Samuel Rousseau, 2011 Université de Montréal Faculté des Arts et des Sciences Ce mémoire intitulé : Trois utopies au temps de la Révocation de l‟édit de Nantes : la vision de la France selon Jacques- Bénigne Bossuet (1627-1704), Pierre Jurieu (1637-1713) et Pierre Bayle (1647-1706). présenté par : Samuel Rousseau a été évalué par un jury composé des personnes suivantes : M. Ollivier Hubert…………………….Président-rapporteur Mme Dominique Deslandres……….Directrice de recherche M. Nicholas Dew……………………. Membre du jury i Sommaire En 1685, sous le règne de Louis XIV, au moment où la monarchie française voulut extirper l‟altérité protestante en révoquant l‟édit de Nantes (1598), trois contemporains, Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet (1627-1704), Pierre Jurieu (1637-1713) et Pierre Bayle (1647-1706) élaborèrent des utopies dans lesquelles ils nous font connaître leur vision d‟une France idéale. Ces trois utopies, nous voulons les restituer au cours de ce mémoire de maîtrise et souligner quelles sont leurs propositions respectives en matière de gouvernement et de relations interreligieuses. Nous aborderons leurs positions quant aux conséquences politico-religieuses de la Révocation. Et enfin nous dirons quel est le traitement que ces trois auteurs réservent dans leurs textes à la question de la tolérance étatique. MOTS-CLÉS : Altérité, Intolérance, Révocation de l‟édit de Nantes, Tolérance, Utopie, Jacques- Bénigne Bossuet, Pierre Jurieu, Pierre Bayle. Asbtract In 1685, during the reign of Louis XIV, the French monarchy tried to extirpate the Calvinist alterity from the kingdom by revoking the Edict of Nantes (1598). At that time three contemporaries, Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet (1627-1704), Pierre Jurieu (1637-1713) and Pierre Bayle (1647-1706), the first Catholic, the others Protestants, conceived utopias in which they introduce us to their vision of an ideal France. The general aim of this master‟s thesis is to analyze these three utopias and show their proposals in matters of government and interfaith relationship. More precisely, we will study the authors‟ positions about the politico-religious consequences of the Revocation. We will also see in their writings how they understand the tolerance issue. KEYWORDS : Alterity, Intolerance, Revocation of the Edict of Nantes, Tolerance, Utopia, Jacques- Bénigne Bossuet, Pierre Jurieu, Pierre Bayle. ii Table des matières Sommaire ............................................................................................................................................ i Asbtract ............................................................................................................................................... i Table des matières .............................................................................................................................. ii Remerciements .................................................................................................................................. iv Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Concepts utilisés ............................................................................................................................. 2 Représentation ........................................................................................................................... 2 Altérité ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Utopie........................................................................................................................................ 5 Exposition du sujet : la vision de la France de Louis XIV au moment de la Révocation de l‟édit de Nantes (1685) ................................................................................................................................. 9 Brèves bio-bibliographies des auteurs étudiés .................................................................................. 14 Bossuet ................................................................................................................................... 14 Jurieu ...................................................................................................................................... 18 Bayle ....................................................................................................................................... 21 Le but de ce travail et les sources retenues ...................................................................................... 25 Chapitre 1 – Autour de la Révocation de l‟édit de Nantes ..................................................................... 29 Un édit de Nantes uniquement pacificateur ...................................................................................... 29 La Révocation : une décision politique de Louis XIV ......................................................................... 34 Raison d‟État, uniformité et refus du pluralisme religieux .............................................................. 40 L‟attitude du clergé catholique et des dévots .................................................................................... 43 Révocation et projet de société ....................................................................................................... 50 Réception et conséquences ............................................................................................................ 52 Chapitre 2 – Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet .............................................................................................. 60 La controverse antiprotestante et la justification de la Révocation ...................................................... 60 Bossuet et l‟altérité religieuse .................................................................................................... 62 Bossuet et la Révocation ........................................................................................................... 65 Quelle utopie chez Bossuet ? ......................................................................................................... 73 Unité politique : le monarque absolu et de droit divin .................................................................... 74 iii Unité religieuse : le trône et l‟autel .............................................................................................. 85 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................... 89 Chapitre 3 – Pierre Jurieu .................................................................................................................. 92 Réaction à la persécution anti-protestante et à la Révocation ............................................................ 92 Description de l‟utopie .................................................................................................................. 102 Gouvernement « borné » et droit à la résistance ........................................................................ 102 Respect des « Droits de Dieu » et intolérance protestante .......................................................... 116 Tolérance intra-protestante ...................................................................................................... 124 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................. 126 Chapitre 4 – Pierre Bayle ................................................................................................................ 131 Une réponse ardente et spontanée de Bayle à la Révocation .......................................................... 134 Étude de deux théoriciens de la tolérance ...................................................................................... 138 Hobbes et l‟exigence de « conformité » .................................................................................... 139 Locke et la neutralité de l‟État .................................................................................................. 141 Description de l‟utopie .................................................................................................................. 144 Les droits de la conscience errante .......................................................................................... 144 Vers la tolérance étatique ........................................................................................................ 155 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................. 161 Conclusion générale ....................................................................................................................... 166 Les auteurs sur le rôle et la nature de l‟autorité souveraine .............................................................. 168 Bossuet et Jurieu : la similarité au-delà des oppositions .................................................................
Recommended publications
  • This Electronic Thesis Or Dissertation Has Been Downloaded from Explore Bristol Research
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from Explore Bristol Research, http://research-information.bristol.ac.uk Author: Jenkins, Clare Helen Elizabeth Title: Jansenism as literature : a study into the influence of Augustinian theology on seventeenth-century French literature General rights Access to the thesis is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License. A copy of this may be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode This license sets out your rights and the restrictions that apply to your access to the thesis so it is important you read this before proceeding. Take down policy Some pages of this thesis may have been removed for copyright restrictions prior to having it been deposited in Explore Bristol Research. However, if you have discovered material within the thesis that you consider to be unlawful e.g. breaches of copyright (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please contact [email protected] and include the following information in your message: •Your contact details •Bibliographic details for the item, including a URL •An outline nature of the complaint Your claim will be investigated and, where appropriate, the item in question will be removed from public view as soon as possible. Jansenism as Literature: A Study into the Influence of Augustinian Theology on Seventeenth-Century French Literature Clare Helen Elizabeth Jenkins A Dissertation submitted to the University of Bristol in accordance with the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Arts.
    [Show full text]
  • LIVRES ET BIBLIOPHILIE Jeudi 26 & VENDREDI 27 Octobre 2017 VENTE AUX ENCHÈRES PUBLIQUES
    LIVRES ET BIBLIOPHILIE JEUDI 26 & VENDREDI 27 OCtobre 2017 VENTE AUX ENCHÈRES PUBLIQUES Provenances : 1ère Vente Jeudi 26 octobre à 10h00 et 14h30 Bibliothèque Janséniste du Professeur Jean Mesnard (1921-2016). 2ème Vente Vendredi 27 octobre à 10h00 et 14h30 Bibliothèque d'un château en Armagnac. Diverses successions et collections de Bordeaux et d'Aquitaine. Lot 951 Photo de couverture lot 705 3 HÔTEL DES VENTES BORDEAUX SAINTE - CROIX 12-14, rue Peyronnet - 33800 Bordeaux S.A.S. BRISCADIEU BORDEAUX (Agrément 2002 304) ContaCT Photos SUPPLÉMentaires EXPERT DE LA VENTE T : 33 (0)5 56 31 32 33 www.briscadieu-bordeaux.com M. Michel CONVERT F : 33 (0)5 56 31 32 00 www.interencheres.com 06 30 36 96 13 M : [email protected] www.auction.fr [email protected] assisté de Jean Luc BOISSEAU RENSEIGNEMents partiCIPER À LA VENTE EN LIVE pour la bibliothèque du Professeur Mesnard. Antoine Briscadieu www.interencheres-live.com Thomas Nicolet ORDRES D'ACHAT ET TÉLÉPHONES Exposition DE LA VENTE Anne Courtois Briscadieu Mercredi 25 octobre : [email protected] de 10h à 12h00 et de 14h30 à 19h00 SOMMAIRE 1ère Vente : 2ème Vente : Jeudi 26 octobre à 10h et 14h30 Vendredi 27 octobre à 10h et 14h30 Une trentaine de lots intégrés tardivement dans la vente figureront en Bis de numéros mais ne figurent pas dans le catalogue. L'ensemble du catalogue (avec les bis) est consultable sur le site interencheres (ou interencheres Live). Détail lot 945 4 5 1ère VENTE : JEUDI 26 OCtobre 2017 À 10H & 14H30 6 - AMELOT DE LA HOUSSAYE (Abraham-Nicolas) ANCIENS Histoire du gouvernement de Venise.
    [Show full text]
  • Blaise Pascal: from Birth to Rebirth to Apologist
    Blaise Pascal: From Birth to Rebirth to Apologist A Thesis Presented To Dr. Stephen Strehle Liberty University Graduate School In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Course THEO 690 Thesis by Lew A. Weider May 9, 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 Chapter I. JANSENISM AND ITS INFLUENCE ON BLAISE PASCAL 12 The Origin of Jansenism . 12 Jansenism and Its Influence on the Pascals . 14 Blaise Pascal and his Experiments with Science and Technology . 16 The Pascal's Move Back to Paris . 19 The Pain of Loneliness for Blaise Pascal . 21 The Worldly Period . 23 Blaise Pascal's Second Conversion 26 Pascal and the Provincial Lettres . 28 The Origin of the Pensees . 32 II. PASCAL AND HIS MEANS OF BELIEF 35 The Influence on Pascal's Means of Belief 36 Pascal and His View of Reason . 42 Pascal and His View of Faith . 45 III. THE PENSEES: PASCAL'S APOLOGETIC FOR THE CHRISTIAN FAITH 50 The Wager Argument . 51 The Miracles of Holy Scripture 56 The Prophecies . 60 CONCLUSION . 63 BIBLIOGRAPHY . 65 INTRODUCTION Blaise Pascal was a genius. He was revered as a great mathematician and physicist, an inventor, and the greatest prose stylist in the French language. He was a defender of religious freedom and an apologist of the Christian faith. He was born June 19, 1623, at Clermont, the capital of Auvergne, which was a small town of about nine thousand inhabitants. He was born to Etienne and Antoinette Pascal. Blaise had two sisters, Gilberte, born in 1620, and Jacqueline, born in 1625. Blaise was born into a very influential family.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquinas's Account of Double Effect Thomas A
    The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center Philosophy College of Arts and Sciences 1997 Aquinas's Account of Double Effect Thomas A. Cavanaugh University of San Francisco, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.usfca.edu/phil Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Cavanaugh, Thomas A., "Aquinas's Account of Double Effect" (1997). Philosophy. Paper 33. http://repository.usfca.edu/phil/33 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts and Sciences at USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy by an authorized administrator of USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. T. A. Cavanaugh, Philosophy, University of San Francisco Penultimate Draft of: Aquinas's Account of Double Effect, The Thomist, Vol. 61, No.1, January 1997, pp. 107-121. AQUINAS'S ACCOUNT OF DOUBLE EFFECT THOMAS A. CAVANAUGH UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO In this paper, I present Aquinas's account of double-effect reasoning (DER) -- often called the "principle," "rule," or "doctrine" of double effect. Often, if not always, DER is attributed to Thomas Aquinas tout court.i Yet, I will argue, Thomas's account substantially differs from contemporary double-effect reasoning (DER) insofar as Thomas considers the ethical status of risking an assailant's life while contemporary accounts of DER focus on actions causing harm foreseen as inevitable.ii Of course, if DER applies to cases in which harm is foreseen as an inevitable result of an otherwise good action, it will apply to cases in which harm is foreseen as being a possible consequence.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Notes
    “Modern, Anti- and Post- Modern Augustines” for “In Dialogue with Augustine” Villanova University July 23-27, 2001. An intensive seminar (three hours, Monday through Friday). Fifteen Hours Taking Descartes’ use and reworking of Augustine as defining his modern reception, the course will examine this modern Augustine, its developments, the alternatives to it and reactions against it. Topics and figures considered will include Early Modern Augustinian predecessors of Descartes like Jean Calvin, Richard Hooker and the Cardinal de Bérulle; fellows in the Cartesian project to employ an Augustinian logic for a revolution in the Christian relation to the cosmos like Galileo; the continuation of Augustinian scholasticism; the modern Augustinian reactions against modern secularity like those of Pascal, his Jansenist friends, and Kierkegaard; continuations of Augustinian Christian Platonism in the Cambridge Platonists, Ontologism, German Idealism, and in the retrieval of the Fathers of the Church. Other Twentieth-century interpretations will include the reassertion of a modern Augustinianism with Phenomenology, Charles Taylor and Stephen Menn and its opposite in the Protestant Orthodoxy of Karl Barth and his postmodern heirs, Jean-Luc Marion and Radical Orthodoxy. Finally, connections of these with the Jewish Augustine of Jacques Derrida and the revival of theurgic Neoplatonism will be considered. The aim will be to demonstrate the mutual dependence of the modern and anti-modern, the philosophical and religious forms of our following of Augustine. A Note on the Reading List It is not intended that every item on the list be required for each participant, although it will be clear that some of the readings are necessary for everyone.
    [Show full text]
  • Moral Theology, Culture of Counsel, and the Society of Jesus in the Seventeenth Century
    journal of jesuit studies 4 (2017) 230-249 brill.com/jjs Moral Theology, Culture of Counsel, and the Society of Jesus in the Seventeenth Century Jean-Pascal Gay Université Catholique de Louvain [email protected] Abstract This paper explores the connection between the early modern debates over Proba- bilism and political counsel. It argues that the issue of counsel was important in the polemics against Jesuit moral theology. Theological challenges to Probabilism clearly show that many intellectuals were worried it could lead political counsellors astray and encourage them to defer to the whims of political authorities. This was not mere- ly a theoretical issue. Three French cases evidence the fact that political counsellors could claim an obligation to put obedience to their sovereign before obedience to religious authority—the pope in particular—on religious grounds. The discussion between anti-probabilists and probabilists during the second half of the seventeenth century shows the degree of unrest among theological and ecclesiastical authorities confronted with the demands of the state on individual conscience, and on the con- science of counsellors in particular. Keywords Probabilism –anti-Probabilism – confessionalization – political counsel – polemics – casuistry – Jesuits In recent years, early modern theology and the issue of Probabilism in par- ticular have increasingly attracted scholarly attention.1 Historians of religion 1 See Robert A. Maryks, Saint Cicero and the Jesuits: The Influence of the Liberal Arts on the Adoption of Moral Probabilism (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008); Emanuele Colombo, Un gesuita in- quieto: Carlo Antonio Casnedi (1643–1725) e il suo tempo (Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino, 2006); © Gay, 2017 | doi 10.1163/22141332-00402005 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial 4.0 Unported (CC-BY-NC 4.0) License.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 a Moral Threat to Society? – the Jesuit Danger 1814–1961
    6Amoral threattosociety? – the Jesuit danger 1814–1961 Afather and his “Jesuitism” From 1928 onwards,Heinrich Roos (1904–1977) was aJesuitfather in Copenha- gen. He was German-born, but had acquired Danishcitizenship. Ever since the Jesuits had been expelled from Bismarck’sGermanyinthe early1870s, Jesuit schools in Denmark had taught in both Germanand Danish. ManyGermans soughttoattend DanishJesuit schools, especiallyduringthe period whenthe or- der’sinstitutions werebanned in Germany.Roos taught at the school in Copen- hagen, in addition to holding aposition as philologist at the city’suniversity.¹ In February 1954,the Theological Association in Norwayapplied to the Min- istry of Justice on behalf of Roos for an exemption from the constitutional ban on Jesuits.They wanted him to visit the country to present alecture on the work and teachings of the Jesuits.² The issue of the exclusion of the Jesuits had been raised in connection with the government’sratification of the European Convention on Human Rights in 1951. Norwayhad expressed reservations about the clause on religious freedom because of the ban on Jesuits, which, at an international level, was problematic and controversial. In 1952, therefore, the government for- warded aproposal to repeal this last exclusionary provision from the Constitu- tion. It was in this context that Father Roos applied to come to Norway – but he was turned down. Giving his reasoning,Minister of Justice KaiBirgerKnudsen (1903–1977) in Oscar Torp’s(1893–1958) Labour Party government explained that it was
    [Show full text]
  • A Formula for Disobedience: Jansenism, Gender, and the Feminist Paradox*
    A Formula for Disobedience: Jansenism, Gender, and the Feminist Paradox* Daniella Kostroun Stonehill College On the morning of June 10, 1664, the archbishop of Paris, Hardouin de Pe´- re´fixe, met with Marguerite de Sainte-Gertrude Dupre´, a nun at the convent of Port Royal de Paris, for a one-on-one conversation. His purpose for this meet- ing was to change Dupre´’s mind about her refusal to sign a formula con- demning the Augustinus (1640), a theological study by Cornelius Jansen, the late bishop of Ypres. According to Dupre´’s own account, the archbishop began the interview by offering her a chair and expressing his confidence that he could ease her doubts. He asked her, “Why, my sister, can you not sign? One must not say that one will not do something out of stubbornness, one must have one’s reasons; ah, tell them to me.”1 When Dupre´ responded, “It would not be right, Monsignor, to fail in what you wish from us without reason, and if my conscience would allow me ...,”2 he interrupted her abruptly: “My conscience . my conscience! Does your conscience permit you to disobey * Research for this article was supported by the Erasmus Institute of the University of Notre Dame and the Center for Seventeenth- and Eighteenth-Century Studies at the University of California, Los Angeles. Various sections were presented at the Western Society for French History conference in 2000, the American Catholic Historical As- sociation meeting in 2001, the Culture and Authority in the Baroque conference at the William Andrews Clark Memorial Library in Los Angeles in February 2001, and the North American Society for Seventeenth-Century French Literature conference in 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Monographie Des Éditions Des Lettres Provinciales Par Blaise Pascal, Ou
    li 11 'i ' il p : " m x^- ?~^^ !V BULLETIN DU BIBLIOPHILE ET DU BIBLIOTHECAIREr SUPPLEMENT DE LA LIVRAISON DE MARS-AVRIL 1878 PARIS. — TYPOGRAPHIE LAHURE Rne de Fleuras. 9 MONOGRAPHIE DES EDITIONS DES LETTRES PROVINCIALES PAR BLAISE PASCAL CATALOGUE RAISONNÉ d'une collection DES LETTRES PROVINCIALES Formé par fed M. J. H. BASSE CfaeTaller de la Légion d'honneur, ancien directeur de la Salpétrière AUX PRIX MARQUES PAR CHAQUE ARTICLE A LA LIBRAIRIE DE LÉON TECHENER 52, RUE DB l'aRBRE-SEC, AU FHEIHIEE, A PARIS 1878 La coilectioa spéciale que nous présentons aux amateurs a été faite avec beaucoup de soin : c'est le résultat de qua- rante années de recherches assidues. On pourra également former des spécialités de divers genres, on ne pourra pas s'attacher à une réunion plus intéressante et plus précieuse à tant de titres. On remarquera avec quelle sollicitude les exemplaires sont composés et reliés par les plus habiles re- lieurs de notre temps, — quand la reliure ancienne n'a pas pu être conservée. Feu M. H. Basse, qui avait consacré ses loisirs à l'étude des Provinciales^ avait une admiration sans bornes pour Pascal. Il a publié quelques articles sur les Provinciales dans le Bulletin du Bibliophile et avait préparé lui-même une édition nouvelle de cet ouvrage ; ce travail laborieux et inap- préciable est encore inédit. M. Basse a cherché à réunir toutes les éditions connues et à posséder les plus beaux exemplaires possibles. Il s'ho- norait de l'amitié de M. Bauzonnet et de M. G. Trautz, et ces illustres artistes ont en effet exécuté pour M.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham Research Online
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 18 September 2015 Version of attached le: Accepted Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Reinhardt, Nicole (2015) 'How individual was conscience in the early-modern period? Observations on the development of Catholic moral theology.', Religion., 45 (3). pp. 409-428. Further information on publisher's website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2015.1024039 Publisher's copyright statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor Francis Group in Religion on 29/05/2015, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/0048721X.2015.1024039. Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk ©Nicole Reinhardt (University of Durham, UK) How individual was conscience in the early modern period? Observations on the development of Catholic moral theology Introduction When, in 1950, the convert from Protestantism to Catholicism Jacques Maritain identified Luther as one of the “begetters … of the modern conscience”, this was not intended as a compliment (Maritain 1970, 4).
    [Show full text]
  • Some Aspects of Jansenism
    Durham E-Theses Some aspects of Jansenism Moreton, H. A. V. How to cite: Moreton, H. A. V. (1962) Some aspects of Jansenism, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/9923/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk H. A. V. M 0 R E T 0 N SOME ASPECTS OP JANSENISM M.Litt. Thesis, 1962 CONTENTS i^BBEVIATIONS, and NOTE IHTHODUCriON i - xiv PART ONE Janeenisin in Itence TEE EARLY STAGES 1 The Lettres Frovinciales 5 GALLIGANISM AND RICHERISM: part sources of Jansenism 11 THE SEOOND JANSENISM 25 Pasquier Qiesnel 26 Guy Drappier 41 Nicolas le Gros 50 EVENTS LEADING UP TO THE COUNCIL OP EMBRUN, 1727 56 AN EXAMPLE OF OPPOSITION TO THE COUNCIL OF E3IBRUN AND TO THE REFUSAL OF SACRAMENTS 76 THE PARLEM3n'S AND JANSMISM: THE REFUSAL OF SACRAMEin?S (a) During the episcopate of Archbishop Yintimille, 1729^46 85 (b)
    [Show full text]
  • NICOLE REINHARDT the King's Confessor: Changing Images
    NICOLE REINHARDT The King's Confessor: Changing Images in MICHAEL SCHAICH (ed.), Monarchy and Religion: The Transformation of Royal Culture in Eighteenth-Century Europe (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007) pp. 153–185 ISBN: 978 0 19 921472 3 The following PDF is published under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND licence. Anyone may freely read, download, distribute, and make the work available to the public in printed or electronic form provided that appropriate credit is given. However, no commercial use is allowed and the work may not be altered or transformed, or serve as the basis for a derivative work. The publication rights for this volume have formally reverted from Oxford University Press to the German Historical Institute London. All reasonable effort has been made to contact any further copyright holders in this volume. Any objections to this material being published online under open access should be addressed to the German Historical Institute London. DOI: 6 The King's Confessor: Changing Images NICOLE REINHARDT Voltaire, in his famous account of the reign of Louis XIV (1643-1715), makes an interesting statement referring to the last years of the Sun King's reign: 'C'est une chose très remarquable que le public, qui lui pardonna toutes ses maitresses, ne lui pardonna pas son confesseur [Père Le Tellier]. Il perdit, les trois demieres années de sa vie, clans l'esprit de la plupart de ses sujets, tout ce qu'il avait fait de grand et de memorable.'1 Voltaire's remarkable observation sums up the central argument of this essay, namely, that the king and his confessor cannot be regarded separately, but must be seen as reflecting each other's images.
    [Show full text]