(EU) No 1146/2012 of 3 December 2012 Amending Regulation

5.12.2012 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 333/7

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1146/2012 of 3 December 2012 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Community (Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, opened in the framework of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 and its implementing Regulation (EC) No 5 Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European 473/2006 ( ), with competent authorities and air Union, carriers of the following States: Algeria, Aruba, Bang ladesh, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Central African Republic, China, Comoros, Cuba, Curacao, Egypt, Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 of the Ethiopia, Georgia, Guinea-Bissau, Lesotho, Malawi, Mali, European Parliament and the Council of 14 December 2005 Nepal, Pakistan, Russian Federation, St Maarten, Ukraine, on the establishment of a Community list of air carriers subject Yemen; Eritrea, Libya; Afghanistan, Angola, Benin, to an operating ban within the Community and on informing Congo-Brazzaville, Democratic Republic of Congo, air passengers of the identity of the operating carrier, and Djibouti, DPR of Korea, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, repealing Article 9 of Directive 2004/36/CE ( 1 ), and in particular Ghana, Honduras, Indonesia, Iran, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Article 4 thereof ( 2), Kyrgyzstan, Liberia, Madagascar, Mauritania, Mozambique, Philippines, Rwanda, Sao Tome and Whereas: Principe, Sierra Leone, Sudan, Suriname, Swaziland, Venezuela and Zambia. (1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 ( 3) of 22 March 2006 established the Community list of air (6) The Air Safety Committee has heard presentations by carriers which are subject to an operating ban within EASA about the results of the analysis of audit reports the Union referred to in Chapter II of Regulation (EC) carried out by the International Civil Aviation Organi No 2111/2005. sation (ICAO hereafter) in the framework of ICAO’s Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme (USOAP). (2) In accordance with Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No Member States were invited to prioritize ramp 2111/2005, some Member States and the European inspections on air carriers licensed on States for which Aviation Safety Agency (hereinafter ‘EASA’) significant safety concern(s) have been identified by ICAO communicated to the Commission information that is or for which EASA concluded that there are significant relevant in the context of updating the Community list. deficiencies in the safety oversight system. Notwith Relevant information was also communicated by third standing consultations undertaken by the Commission countries. On this basis, the Community list should be under Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005, this will permit updated. to acquire further information regarding the safety performance on the air carriers licensed in these States. (3) The Commission informed all air carriers concerned either directly or, when this was not practicable, through the authorities responsible for their regulatory (7) The Air Safety Committee has heard presentations by oversight, indicating the essential facts and considerations EASA about the results of the analysis of ramp which would form the basis for a decision to impose on inspections carried out under the Safety Assessment of them an operating ban within the Union or to modify Foreign Aircraft programme (SAFA) in accordance with the conditions of an operating ban imposed on an air Commission Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 of 5 October carrier which is included in the Community list. 2012 laying down the technical requirements and admin istrative procedures related to air operations pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European (4) Opportunity was given by the Commission to the air Parliament and of the Council ( 6). carriers concerned to consult documents provided by Member States, to submit written comments and to make an oral presentation to the Commission within (8) The Air Safety Committee has also heard presentations 10 working days and to the Air Safety Committee estab by EASA about the technical assistance projects carried lished by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3922/1991 of out in States affected by measures under Regulation (EC) 16 December on the harmonization of the technical No 2111/2005. It was informed about the requests for requirements and administrative procedures in the field further technical assistance and cooperation to improve of civil aviation ( 4 ). the administrative and technical capability of civil aviation authorities with a view to resolving non (5) The Air Safety Committee has received updates from the compliances with applicable international standards. Commission about the on-going joint-consultations Member States were invited to respond to these requests on a bilateral basis in coordination with the Commission and EASA. ( 1 ) OJ L 344, 27.12.2005, p. 15. ( 2 ) OJ L 143, 30.4.2004, p. 76. ( 3 ) OJ L 84, 23.3.2006, p. 14. ( 5 ) OJ L 84, 23.3.2006, p. 8. ( 4 ) OJ L 373, 31.12.1991, p. 4. ( 6 ) OJ L 296 25.10.2012, p 1. L 333/8 EN Official Journal of the European Union 5.12.2012

(9) Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 should be therefore Comlux Aruba N.V. amended accordingly. (14) In February 2012 the competent authority of Aruba committed to introduce amendments in the national legal system and to take administrative action vis-à-vis (10) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in Comlux Aruba to ensure that by 1 August 2012 the accordance with the opinion of the Air Safety operational control of this air carrier would be Committee. exercised from Aruba.

European Union air carriers (15) In order to obtain updated information on this issue, the Commission, EASA and certain Members of the Air (11) Following the analysis by EASA of information resulting Safety Committee conducted on 15 October 2012 in from SAFA ramp checks carried out on aircraft of certain Brussels consultations with the competent authority of Union air carriers or from standardisation inspections Aruba. These authorities informed and provided carried out by EASA as well as specific inspections and evidence that the flight operations legislation has been audits carried out by national aviation authorities, some amended to strengthen the requirements regarding the Member States have taken certain enforcement measures. establishment of the principal place of business in They informed the Commission and the Air Safety Aruba. These authorities also confirmed that the oper Committee about these measures: Greece informed that ational control of Comlux Aruba N.V. had been estab the Air Operator Certificate (AOC) of Sky Wings was lished in Aruba to their satisfaction. Changes in the suspended further to the suspension of its continuous organisation and accountabilities of this carrier have airworthiness management organisation approval on been implemented in that respect. Furthermore, the 7 October 2012; Luxembourg informed that the AOC AOC was limited to one aircraft of type B767 and will of Strategic Airlines was revoked on 8 October 2012 and be renewed on a year basis only, subject to satisfactory that the air carrier has ceased to exist; Spain informed results of the continuous oversight to ensure that the that the air carrier IMD Airways has successfully imple organisational changes are effective. mented corrective actions and remains on heightened surveillance; and Slovenia informed that the AOC of Linxair Business Airlines was revoked on 2 October (16) The Commission noted the progress made by the 2012. competent authorities of the Aruba and encourages them to continue their efforts towards strengthening their civil aviation oversight system in compliance with Air Algérie international safety standards.

(12) Having regard to the results of the ramp inspections carried out in 2008 and 2009 on the aircraft operated Air carriers from the Republic of Congo by the air carrier Air Algérie in the framework of the SAFA programme, the Commission had entered into (17) All air carriers certified in the Republic of Congo have formal consultations with the competent authorities of been listed in Annex A since November 2009. The Algeria (DACM) in December 2009 as detailed in Regu Commission and EASA held a consultation meeting 1 2 lations (EC) No 590/2010 ( ) and (EC) No 1071/2010 ( ). with the competent authorities of the Republic of These formal consultations resulted in the implemen Congo (ANAC) on 12 October 2012, during which tation of satisfactory solutions to redress the identified ANAC presented the progress made to date in order to safety deficiencies in the short term as well as in the alleviate the safety concerns identified by the Inter development of a solid corrective and preventive action national Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) at the plan by DACM and the air operator Air Algérie for occasion of the audit carried out in 2008 in the sustainable solutions. The safety performance of the air framework of ICAO’s Universal Safety Oversight Audit carrier Air Algérie continued to be verified through the Program (USOAP). results of the SAFA programme along with the monthly reports sent by DACM to the Commission on the results of their surveillance activities on the air operator as well (18) ANAC provided the Commission with evidence of the as on the progress made in the implementation of the expiration of the AOC of the air carrier Société aforementioned corrective and preventive plans. Nouvelle Air Congo and confirmed that the air carrier has ceased its activities. Consequently, on the basis of the common criteria, it should be withdrawn from Annex A. (13) Considering the favourable trend observed on the results of the SAFA inspections since November 2010, the absence of serious safety deficiencies and the implemen (19) ANAC provided the Commission with information indi tation of the corrective and preventive actions in cating that an AOC was granted to the following air accordance with the planning, the Commission decided carriers: Canadian Airways’ Congo, Eméraude, Equajet in July 2012 to close the formal consultations with and Mistral Aviation. However, ANAC did not provide DACM under Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 the evidence that the safety oversight of these air carriers are ensured in compliance with international safety stan ( 1 ) OJ L 170, 6.7.2010, p. 9. dards, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed ( 2 ) OJ L 306, 23.11.2010, p. 44. that these air carriers should be included in Annex A. 5.12.2012 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 333/9

(20) The Commission noted the progress made by the critical elements of their safety oversight system. In competent authorities of the Republic of Congo and particular, the competent authorities of the Netherlands encourages them to continue their efforts towards the Antilles did not have sufficient technical staff in the areas establishment of a civil aviation oversight system in of personnel licensing, aircraft operations, air navigation compliance with international safety standards. services and aerodromes to carry out their safety oversight functions.

Air carriers from the Democratic Republic of Congo

(21) Air carriers certified in the Democratic Republic of (26) In addition, following an assessment by the Federal Congo have been listed in Annex A since March Aviation Administration (FAA) of the United States 2006 ( 1 ).The competent authorities of the Democratic under the IASA programme in September 2011, Republic of Congo have taken the initiative of re-estab Curaçao and St Maarten were downgraded from lishing active consultations with the Commission and Category 1 to Category 2 because the FAA considers EASA, indicating their firm intention of conducting a that they did not sufficiently comply with international thorough review and a complete overhaul of the safety standards. aviation industry as well as of the national regulatory oversight authority.

(27) Finally, ramp checks conducted under the auspices of the 3 (22) The competent authorities of the Democratic Republic of SAFA programme ( ) during the period May 2011 to Congo informed that an AOC was granted to the May 2012 identified findings amounting to an average following air carriers: Air Fast Congo, Fly Congo, of over one major finding per inspection. Katanga Express, Katanga Wings, Mango Airlines, and Will Airlift. However, since ANAC did not provide the evidence that the safety oversight of these air carriers is ensured in compliance with international safety stan (28) As a result, the Commission entered into consultations dards, on the basis of the common criteria, it is with the competent authorities of Curaçao and St assessed that these air carriers should be included in Maarten and wrote to them in July 2012 seeking Annex A. details of what corrective actions had been put in place or are being planned. These consultations are on-going.

(23) The competent authorities of Democratic Republic of Congo have not provided evidence that the other air carriers mentioned in Annex A have ceased operations. (29) The Competent Authorities of both Curaçao and St Consequently, on the basis of the common criteria, it is Maarten responded to the Commission and detailed the assessed that these air carriers should remain in Annex A. corrective actions underway and planned to address the ICAO and FAA audit findings.

(24) The Commission noted the progress made by the competent authorities of the Democratic Republic of Congo and encourages them to continue their efforts (30) The Netherlands informed the Air Safety Committee that towards the establishment of a civil aviation oversight they were active in providing technical assistance to both system in compliance with international safety standards, Curaçao and St Maarten to assist them in their efforts to while remaining committed to further develop the establish a safety oversight system that is in compliance constructive dialogue re-established recently. with ICAO standards.

Air carriers from Curaçao and St Maarten (31) The Commission takes note of the actions by the (25) ICAO conducted an audit of the Netherlands Antilles ( 2 ) competent authorities of Curaçao and St Maarten and in 2008 and made a number of findings on all the encourages them to continue with determination with their efforts to address the shortcomings in their aviation safety oversight system, failing which the ( 1 ) Recitals (60) to (64) of Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 of 22 March 2006, OJ L 84, 23.3.2006, p. 18. Commission will be compelled to take action under ( 2 ) In October 2010 the Netherlands Antilles (being part of the Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005. Member States will Kingdom of the Netherlands) were dissolved and two new continue to closely monitor, via prioritised ramp countries were created: Curaçao and Sint Maarten. The Kingdom checks in the framework of the SAFA programme, that of the Netherlands now consists of four countries: the Netherlands the corrective actions are effective. (in Europe), Aruba, Curaçao and Sint Maarten. Curaçao and Sint Maarten are the legal successors of the Netherlands Antilles and therefore share the same aircraft register (PJ). Since October 2010 ( 3 ) CAA-NL-2012-30, CAA-NL-2012-154, CAA-NL-2012-155, CAA- both countries have to organize their aviation safety oversight NL-2012-156, CAA-NL-2012-161, CAA-NL-2012-162; DGAC/F- system for themselves and each country has created its own 2011-1628, DGAC/F-2011-1640, DGAC/F-2011-2007, DGAC/F- competent authorities. Because of the interdependencies between 2011-2329, DGAC/F-2012-230, DGAC/F-2012-231, DGAC/F- the two countries, the cases are reviewed in parallel. 2012-603, DGAC/F-2012-693. L 333/10 EN Official Journal of the European Union 5.12.2012

Air carriers from Equatorial Guinea addressed. It was not clear whether that Eritrea had requested an ICAO Validation Mission although they (32) All air carriers certified in Equatorial Guinea are subject are receiving support from the ICAO Regional Office to an operational ban within the EU and listed in Annex Safety Team. However, in view of the Air Safety A since March 2006. The competent authorities of the Committee, they failed to adequately demonstrate they Equatorial Guinea (DGAC) provided the Commission had taken comprehensive action to address all aspects with information indicating that an AOC was granted of the Significant Safety Concern. They were also to the air carrier Tango Airways. As there is no unable to provide clarity on the oversight arrangements evidence of any change to the capacity of DGAC to associated with the aircraft listed on AOCs issued by ensure the oversight of air carriers certified in that Eritrea which include wet leased aircraft from foreign State in compliance with the applicable safety standards, air carriers, a consequence of which being that these on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that aircraft are listed on several AOCs, which does not this air carrier should equally be added to Annex A. comply with international safety standards.

Air Carriers from Eritrea (38) Whilst all air carriers licensed in Eritrea were invited to (33) As a result of findings identified during the ICAO audit the Air Safety Committee, one of them, Eritrean Airlines of Eritrea in November 2010 ICAO notified to all made presentations to the Air Safety Committee on Contracting States to the Chicago Convention three 21 November 2012. This air carrier confirmed that it Significant Safety Concerns (SSC) in the areas of Oper operates two aircraft of type A320 to Rome under a ations, Airworthiness and Air Navigation Services. In wet lease arrangement, without providing to the satis addition, ICAO reported in its final audit report that faction of the Air Safety Committee clarity on the oper the lack of effective implementation of international ational oversight and control of its operations. safety standards amounted 79,9 %.

(34) Having regard to these results, the Commission entered (39) The Commission and the Air Safety Committee into formal consultations with the competent authorities acknowledge the efforts being made to address the of Eritrea (ER-CAA) to seek details of what actions the safety deficiencies in the civil aviation system in Eritrea. ER-CAA had taken to address the safety deficiencies However, on the basis of the common criteria, pending identified by the ICAO audit. the effective implementation of adequate corrective actions to remedy the deficiencies identified by ICAO and in particular the outstanding Significant Safety Concern, it is assessed that the competent authorities (35) ER-CAA informed the Commission by letter that whilst of Eritrea are, at this stage, not able to implement and two Significant Safety Concerns concerning enforce the relevant safety standards on air carriers under Airworthiness and Air Navigation Services had been their regulatory control. Therefore, all air carriers certified resolved, the third Significant Safety Concern concerning in Eritrea should be subject to an operating ban and the certification process for the issuance of an Air included in Annex A. Operators Certificate had yet to be resolved and would require a validation mission by ICAO for it to be removed. However, ER-CAA submissions did not contain any information concerning the corrective actions undertaken to address the outstanding Significant (40) Once the outstanding significant safety concern is closed Safety Concern nor any information on the operational to the satisfaction of ICAO, and the major findings of the oversight of Eritrean air carriers, both of whom are auth ICAO audit have been satisfactorily addressed, the orised by Eritrea to operate into the EU. Commission is ready to organise, with the assistance of the EASA and the support of Member States, an on-site assessment to verify the progress achieved and prepare a review of the case at the Air Safety Committee. (36) The Commission invited repeatedly the ER-CAA to consultation meetings to seek further clarification of the oversight of Eritrean AOC holders. However, the ER-CAA declined to attend these meetings. Rollins Air from Honduras

(41) The competent authorities of Honduras requested in June (37) The ER-CAA was invited to the Air Safety Committee 2012 the removal of Rollins Air from the safety list on and made presentations on 21 November 2012. The the basis of the suspension of its AOC. They provided ER-CAA informed that their Corrective Action Plan had evidence on 21 November 2012 that the AOC of Rollins been accepted by ICAO and, as a result of amending Air, which had been suspended for six months, had their primary aviation legislation and promulgating a expired and was eventually cancelled on 24 September number of civil aviation regulations, considered on 2012. Consequently, on the basis of the common their part that the Significant Safety Concern had been criteria, Rollins Air should be removed from Annex A. 5.12.2012 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 333/11

Air carriers from Indonesia orities of Kazakhstan made several submissions, based on which the Commission, assisted by EASA, held a consul (42) Consultations with the competent authorities of tation meeting on 17 October 2012. The competent Indonesia (DGCA) continue with the view to monitoring authorities of Kazakhstan were also heard by the Air the progress of the DGCA in ensuring that the safety Safety Committee on 21 November 2012 and made oversight of all air carriers certified in Indonesia is in presentations in that respect. compliance with international safety standards.

(49) The competent authorities of Kazakhstan reported that (43) On 18 October 2012 a videoconference was held they are progressing in an ambitious reform of the between the Commission, EASA and the DGCA during aviation sector undertaken since 2009 with a view to which the DGCA provided an update regarding certain enhancing air safety. Following the adoption of a new air carriers under their oversight. They informed that five civil aviation code in July 2010 and the adoption of new air carriers had been certified, namely Jayawijaya more than 100 specific aviation regulations, the Dirantara on 16 April 2012, Pacific Royale Airways on competent authorities are now progressing in their 29 May 2012, Citilink Indonesia on 22 June 2012, implementation. They are also progressing in their Angkasa Super Services on 7 June 2012, and Air Born capacity building with the establishment of a Flight Indonesia on 6 March 2012. However, since DGCA did Safety Assessment Centre and the recruitment of not provide the evidence that the safety oversight of additional qualified inspectors, to be continued in the these air carriers is ensured in compliance with inter coming months. They are also progressing in the recer national safety standards, on the basis of the common tification of aircraft and operators. criteria, it is assessed that these carriers should be included in Annex A. (50) The competent authorities of Kazakhstan informed that they continued to take enforcement actions. By order of (44) In addition, the DGCA informed that PT Sampoerna Air the Minister of Transport and Communications of 3 July Nasantara had changed its name to PT Pegasus Air 2011 on the establishment of flight operations rules for Services, and PT Nyaman Air had changed its name to the civil aviation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, from PT Heavy Lift, and that therefore their names should be 1 November 2012 onwards Soviet-built aircraft not in amended in Annex A. compliance with ICAO safety standards are not allowed to operate anymore within the Kazakh airspace; consequently the competent authorities of Kazakhstan banned the operations of 7 aircraft of type Yak-40, 2 (45) DGCA also informed and provided confirmation that the aircraft of type Antonov 12, 5 aircraft of type Antonov AOC of Dirgantara Air Service had been revoked on 24 and 1 aircraft of type Tu-134 ( 1 ). 25 May 2012. Therefore, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that this air carrier should be removed from Annex A. (51) The competent authorities of Kazakhstan also informed the Commission that 5 air carriers had terminated their operations and provided evidence that their AOC had (46) The DGCA also briefed on the results of a US Federal expired and were not renewed; these air carriers are: Aviation Administration (FAA) assessment visit to Asia Wings, Minas, Skybus, Skyjet and Sayakhat Indonesia which took place in September 2012. Whilst Airlines. Consequently, on the basis of the common the FAA noted improvements in the aviation safety criteria, these air carriers should be withdrawn from oversight system over the past years, the FAA made a Annex A. number of observations and recommendations in relation to inspector training, the surveillance of foreign aviation activities, enforcement policy and procedures, particularly (52) The competent authorities of Kazakhstan further concerning the use of fines, and the need to improve informed the Commission that 4 airlines previously some local facilities. The DGCA agreed to provide a involved in commercial air transport have ceased this copy of the formal report of the assessment visit as activity, reduced their fleet and have been recertified soon as it became available. under aerial work; these airlines are: Aero Aircompany, AK Suncare Aircompany, Kazair West, Ust-Kamenogorsk Air division of EKA. Consequently, on the basis of the (47) The Commission and the Air Safety Committee noted the common criteria, these air carriers should be withdrawn sound progress made by the Competent Authorities of from Annex A. Indonesia and continue to encourage their efforts towards completing their work of establishing an aviation system fully compliant with ICAO Standards. (53) The competent authorities of Kazakhstan informed that by order of the Prime Minister no new AOC can be granted until the competent authorities are in position Air carriers from Kazakhstan to fully discharge their responsibilities towards ICAO.

(48) Consultations with the competent authorities of ( 1 ) 7 aircraft of type Yak-40; 2 aircraft of type Antonov 12; 5 aircraft of Kazakhstan have continued actively. The competent auth type Antonov 24; 1 aircraft of type Tu-134. L 333/12 EN Official Journal of the European Union 5.12.2012

(54) Air Astana was heard by the Air Safety Committee on orities of Kyrgyzstan, during which these authorities 21 November 2012 with the view to provide updates on indicated that the Kyrgyzstan had adopted a new legal its fleet which is currently undergoing a renewal and framework and that the exit from the safety list was a made submissions in that respect. They informed that priority for the government. several aircraft had been phased out and that new aircraft are being phased in within the existing B767, B757 A320 series and Fokker 50 fleets, fleets that are (58) The competent authorities of Kyrgyzstan provided already mentioned under Annex B. Air Astana stated and information indicating that the following air carriers provided evidence that the safety performance of its fleet had changed their names: Eastok Avia into Air Bishkek has improved. The competent authorities of Kazakhstan and Dames into State Aviation Enterprise under the stated that the operations of the aircraft currently on the Ministry of Emergency Situations (SAEMES). Therefore, AOC are subject to a certain continuing oversight. The Annex A should be amended accordingly. competent authorities of Aruba also provided evidence that the airworthiness of the Aruban registered aircraft currently on the AOC of Air Astana are subject to (59) The competent authorities of Kyrgyzstan informed that continuing oversight in accordance with international an AOC has been granted to the following air carriers: safety standards and that they are satisfied with the Manas Airways, Supreme Aviation and Sky KG Airlines. airworthiness standards demonstrated. In addition, However, they did not provide the evidence that the Member States and EASA confirmed that no specific safety oversight of these air carriers are ensured in concern arose from ramp checks carried out at compliance with international safety standards. Therefore, European airports in the framework of the SAFA on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that programme. Consequently, in accordance with the these air carriers should be included in Annex A. common criteria, Annex B should be amended to allow, within the current level of operations, the operation of aircraft of type B767, B757, A320 series (60) The competent authorities of Kyrgyzstan provided the and Fokker 50 that are or will be listed on the AOC of Commission with evidence of the revocation of the Air Astana provided such aircraft are registered in Aruba following AOCs: Trast Aero, Asian Air and Kyrgyzstan and the AOC and all changes thereto are timely Airlines. In addition, they informed that the AOCs of submitted to the Commission and Eurocontrol. Aerostan and Itek Air had expired and had not been renewed. Consequently, on the basis of the common (55) Member States will verify the effective compliance with criteria, these air carriers should be withdrawn from relevant safety standards through the prioritisation of Annex A. ramp inspections to be carried out on aircraft of Air Astana pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 965/2012. Should the results of such checks, or any other (61) Upon agreement with the competent authorities of relevant safety information, indicate that international Kyrgyzstan, the Commission remains committed to safety standards are not being met, the Commission organise, with the assistance of EASA and the support will be forced to take action under the auspices of Regu of Member States, a safety assessment mission to lation (EC) No 2111/2005. Kyrgyzstan to verify on-site the implementation of the new rules and the satisfactory oversight of certain air carriers certified in Kyrgyzstan. (56) The Commission continues to support the ambitious reform of the civil aviation system undertaken by the authorities of Kazakhstan and invites these authorities Air carriers from Libya to continue with determination their efforts towards the establishment of a civil aviation oversight system in (62) Consultations with the competent authorities of Libya compliance with international safety standards. To that (LCAA) continue with the aim of confirming that Libya end, it encourages these authorities to continue the is progressing in its work to reform its civil aviation implementation of the corrective action plan agreed safety system, and in particular ensuring that the safety with ICAO, focusing in priority on the two outstanding oversight of all air carriers certified in Libya is in Significant Safety Concerns and the recertification of all compliance with international safety standards. operators under their responsibility. Once those significant safety concerns are closed to the satisfaction of ICAO, the Commission is ready to organise, with the (63) The LCAA, and representatives of Afriqiyah, Libyan assistance of the EASA and the support of Member Airlines and Buraq Air, met with the Commission, States, an on-site assessment to verify the progress EASA, and certain members of the Air Safety achieved and prepare a review of the case at the Air Committee on 15 October 2012 to brief on progress. Safety Committee. The LCAA informed that they had taken regulatory action by revoking the AOCs ( 1 ) of 16 of the 26 Libyan air carriers. They had employed consultants in Air carriers from Kyrgyzstan

( 1 ) International Company, Tobruk Air Transport, Awsaj Aviation (57) The air carriers established in the Kyrgyz Republic have Service, Kalat Aleker Air Company, Alajniha Air Transport, Nayzak been subject to an operating ban since 2006. The Air Transport, Qurina Air Services, Libyan Air Cargo, Air One Nine, Commission, assisted by EASA, held a consultation Gulf Pearal Airlines, Horizon Airline, North African Air Transport, meeting on 5 October 2012 with the competent auth Madina Air, Assanad Aviation, Benina Air, Awas Aviation. 5.12.2012 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 333/13

the short term and ICAO assistance in the long term to time as a full five stage recertification has been completed provide technical support, and that they were in the and any significant findings closed, following which, and process of recruiting a number of additional pilots and in agreement with the Commission, individual air carriers engineers to act as inspecting staff. could be permitted to recommence commercial flights to the EU, Norway, Switzerland and Iceland.

(64) The LCAA further informed that they were embarking on (69) Furthermore, for each air carrier recertified, the LCAA a five stage recertification process of all Libyan air committed to submit to the Commission detailed carriers, commencing with Libyan Airlines and Afriqiyah, information on the recertification process and meet and would report on progress and provide the audit with the Commission and Member States to discuss in reports when they became available. At the same time detail the relevant audits, findings, remedial actions taken they would develop and implement an annual oversight and closure actions, together with details of the plans for system to ensure continued compliance of ICAO continuing oversight before any relaxations of restrictions standards by their air carriers. are agreed. Should this information fail to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Commission and Member States that the recertification process had been effectively completed and a sustainable continued oversight is in (65) The Air Safety Committee heard presentations from the place in accordance with ICAO standards, the LCAA, Libyan Airlines and Afriqiyah on 21 November Commission would be compelled to take measures to 2012. The LCAA stated clearly that unsafe operations prevent air carriers from operating into the EU, would not be tolerated in Libya. They confirmed the Norway, Switzerland and Iceland airspace. If further clari details provided at the meeting of the 16 October, in fication is needed the Commission may decide to particular that the investigation report on the Afriqiyah conduct an on-site visit prior to any relaxation in restric A330 accident would be published before February tions. 2013, that the recertification process is planned to be completed in the case of Libyan Airlines and Afriqiyah by December 2012 and for the remaining air carriers by December 2013. They also informed that they would (70) For air carriers that are subsequently permitted to operate continue to take enforcement action where necessary to into the EU, the Member States will verify the effective contain safety risks, as they did in the case of the compliance with relevant safety standards through the temporary grounding of an A320. prioritisation of ramp inspections to be carried out on aircraft of this carrier pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 965/2012. Should the results of such checks, or any other relevant safety information, indicate that inter national safety standards are not being met the (66) Libyan Airlines informed its safety management Commission will be forced to take action under the processes had been improved as well as the training of auspices of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005. its crew.

Air carriers from the Islamic Republic of Mauritania (67) Afriqiyah informed the Air Safety Committee about its (71) Air carriers certified in Mauritania have been listed in quality assurance system and the use of external training Annex A since November 2010 ( 1 ). The competent auth organisations. The air carrier also stated that, as a result orities of Mauritania (ANAC) have since then engaged in of the A330 accident, the flight schedules were modified active consultations with the Commission with the view to reduce the risk of pilot fatigue, a pilot training to update on progress made in the reform of the regu programme on ‘go-around’ procedures was carried out lation of civil aviation and made numerous submissions and external expertise was brought in to assist in in that respect. Two meetings were held with ANAC and developing safety programmes. The air carrier also Mauritania Airlines on 24 September and 10 October expressed the desire to operate to Spain, France, the 2012. ANAC and Mauritania Airlines International were United Kingdom, Italy, Germany and Austria, once the also heard by the Air Safety Committee on 21 November LCAA had lifted their current restrictions. 2012.

(68) The Commission and Air Safety Committee were (72) ANAC informed that decisive actions were undertaken to encouraged by the sound plan of the LCAA to address reform the safety oversight system and that a number of the safety deficiencies in their aviation system, the achievement have already been obtained: in particular, realistic timescales for actions, and the progress made the establishment of a new civil air code, the to date. They noted that the LCAA would retain the current restrictions on each Libyan air carriers operations ( 1 ) Recitals (43) to (51) of Regulation (EU) No 1071/2010 of into the EU, Norway, Switzerland and Iceland until such 22 November 2010, OJ L 306, 23.11.2010, p. 49. L 333/14 EN Official Journal of the European Union 5.12.2012

amendment of the civil aviation legislation to align it (77) ANAC stated and confirmed in writing that Mauritania with the Annexes to the Chicago Convention, changes Airlines International does not intend to resume flights to the ANAC’s management, structure and staffing and to the EU in the short term, except to Las Palmas de the establishment of a complete set of procedures for the Gran Canaria (Spain) and not before February 2013. certification and the continuous surveillance of air carriers. (78) The competent authorities of Spain indicated that they had provided technical assistance to ANAC and (73) ANAC informed that they have taken effective confirmed that they were satisfied with the flights enforcement actions. ANAC confirmed in particular resuming to Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. that the AOC of Mauritania Airways expired on 15 December 2010 and was not renewed as the air carrier ceased its activity. ANAC also informed that the (79) Member States will verify the effective compliance with certificates and derogations held by the air carrier Class relevant safety standards through the prioritisation of Aviation were revoked in January 2011. ramp inspections to be carried out on aircraft of air carriers licensed in Mauritania pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 965/2012. (74) ICAO carried out two coordination and validations missions (ICVM) in Mauritania in April and September 2012 to validate the progress made by the State. The (80) The Commission intends to carry out, with the assistance final reports stemming from these missions confirm of EASA and the support of Member States, an on-site that major progress has been achieved, with a 47 % safety assessment visit to confirm the satisfactory imple improvement in the overall compliance with inter mentation of the measures taken by ANAC. national safety standards. ICAO confirmed to the Commission on 1 October 2012 the exceptional progress made by ANAC. However, these missions also (81) Should the results of ramp checks or any other relevant concluded on the need to continue the effective imple safety information indicate that international safety mentation of all corrective actions, notably with regard standards are not being met, the Commission will be to the surveillance obligations and the resolution of forced to take actions under the auspices of Regulation identified safety concerns, where ICAO reports the lack (EC) No 2111/2005. of effective implementation of international safety standards reaches 51 % and 58 % respectively. ANAC indicated it intends to pursue its actions with deter Air carriers from the Philippines mination to improve further the compliance with ICAO standards. (82) Air carriers certified in the Philippines have been listed in Annex A since 31 March 2010 ( 1). Consultations with the competent authorities of the Philippines (CAAP) (75) In its consultations with ANAC, the Commission have since then been pursued with the view to obtain specifically assessed the robustness of the safety updates on progress made in the reform of the regulation oversight of Mauritania Airlines International. Defi of civil aviation. Several submissions were made and a ciencies had been identified in the initial certification of videoconference was held on 18 November 2012 Mauritania Airlines International as its AOC was issued between the Commission, assisted by EASA, and the on 8 May 2011 without providing evidence that the CAAP. non-compliance identified during the initial certification of the airline, in particular the RVSM (reduced vertical separation minima) authorisations, the lack of flight data (83) CAAP informed that ICAO carried out an on-site coor monitoring and the lack of ground personnel, had been dination and validation mission (ICVM) in October 2012, effectively rectified prior to the issuance of the AOC. and gave a view on its preliminary results, which reveal a However, ANAC and Mauritania Airlines International 7 % improvement in the overall compliance to ICAO reported and provided evidence that all deficiencies standards. However, the Significant Safety Concern were resolved on 25 October 2012. ANAC also stated notified by ICAO to all Contracting Parties to the and provided evidence that the air carrier is now subject Chicago Convention with regard to the safety oversight to adequate continuous oversight in accordance with of air operators would remain open and further safety international safety standards. concerns were raised by ICAO regarding the aircraft registry.

(76) The Air Safety Committee welcomes the major progress reported by the competent authorities of Mauritania in (84) CAAP confirmed that AviaTour Fly’In was involved in a the rectification of the deficiencies identified by ICAO second fatal accident on 18 August 2012, in addition to and the resolution of the deficiencies identified in the the fatal accident occurred on March 2012 ( 2). The CAAP initial certification of Mauritania Airlines International. did not respond adequately to requests for information Taking into account the effective enforcement actions by the Commission, failing in particular to provide decided and implemented by ANAC with regard to the other air carriers which are no longer in existence, on the ( 1 ) Recitals (74) to (87) of Regulation (EU) No 273/2010 of 30 March basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that all air 2010, OJ L 84, 31.3.2010, p. 32. carriers certified in Mauritania should be removed from ( 2 ) Recital (43) of Regulation (EU) No 295/2012 of 3 April 2012, Annex A. OJ L 98, 4.4.2012, p. 17. 5.12.2012 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 333/15

information on the validity of the AOC of this air carrier significant improvements achieved to date as well as its which, according to previous submissions, was due to open, cooperative and constructive approach in expire on 14 August 2012, and on the on-going addressing shortfalls identified in their procedures. results of the accident investigations on both accidents. While receiving confirmation that the existing procedures for oversight can guarantee that the air carriers undertake timely effective corrective actions in case safety defi ciencies would be identified, the assessment team (85) Whilst the Commission had received information that the air carriers South West Air Corporation, Airgurus identified however areas for improvements, notably and Skyjet would have started commercial air transport, with regard to the procedure related to the approval of the CAAP did not respond adequately to requests for Minimum Equipment List (MEL) as well as the one information by the Commission, failing in particular to related to the approval of the transport of dangerous provide the AOCs of these air carriers together with the goods. complete operations specifications; the CAAP also failed to demonstrate that the certification and continuous oversight of these air carriers comply fully with the (89) Since November 2011 the air carrier Jordan Aviation was applicable international safety standards. Therefore, on subject to heightened surveillance by CARC through an the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that intensive focus on ramp inspections, en-route inspec these air carriers should be equally included in Annex A. tions, aircraft airworthiness reviews and Continuous Airworthiness Management Organisation reviews. Jordan Aviation was also assessed for compliance with (86) The Commission continues to support the reform of the Jordan Civil Aviation Regulations during an annual audit. civil aviation system undertaken by the competent auth The results of these audits pointed to a significant orities of the Philippines and invites these authorities to improvement in the field of the management of the continue with determination their efforts towards the continuing airworthiness. In addition, further to the establishment of a civil aviation oversight system in request of the air operator to add a new type of compliance with international safety standards. To that aircraft (Airbus A330-200) to its fleet, CARC proceeded end, it encourages these authorities to continue the with an assessment of the ability of Jordan Aviation for implementation of the corrective action plan agreed the induction of a new aircraft type. The variation of the with the FAA and ICAO, focusing in priority on the AOC was completed on 9 May 2012 and the Airbus outstanding Significant Safety Concerns, the recertifi A330-200 was added to Jordan Aviation AOC Oper cation of all operators under their responsibility and ations Specifications. effective enforcement actions in case of safety concerns or violations of the applicable legislation. Once the FAA has modified its assessment of the Philippines compliance (90) During the visit the assessment team was provided with with international safety standards and all Significant evidence of the effectiveness of the corrective and Safety Concerns are closed to the satisfaction of ICAO, preventive action plan developed and implemented by the Commission is ready to organise, with the assistance Jordan Aviation. Whilst the air carrier was able to of the EASA and the support of Member States, an on- demonstrate that the system put in place for site assessment to verify the progress achieved and management of continuing airworthiness is now prepare a review of the case at the Air Safety Committee. adequate to ensure the air carrier’s aircraft remain airworthy, the team identified however areas for improvement, notably with regard to the procedures Jordan Aviation for the operation of a new route and the crew planning.

(87) The Commission, assisted by EASA, carried out a safety assessment visit to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan between 30 September and 4 October 2012 in order (91) Following the request made by CARC and Jordan to verify the satisfactory implementation of the Aviation for the reassessment of the operating measures undertaken by the competent authorities for restrictions imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1197/2011 civil aviation (Civil Aviation Regulatory Commission — and considering that the conditions therefore were met, CARC) and the air carrier Jordan Aviation (PSC) to CARC and Jordan Aviation were invited to make presen address the safety concerns described in Regulation (EC) tations to the Air Safety Committee. The hearing took No 1197/2011. place on 21 November 2012. During the meeting CARC and Jordan Aviation also provided the details of the corrective action plan set up to address the observations made during the on-site visit. (88) During the visit, CARC provided the assessment team with evidence of the effectiveness of its corrective and preventive action plan developed and implemented after the imposition of the EU operational restrictions on the (92) The Air Safety Committee welcomed the improvements air carrier Jordan Aviation. It also demonstrated that it achieved by CARC and Jordan Aviation in the implemen was now capable of discharging its obligations under tation of international safety standards and considered ICAO standards for the oversight of operators to that further limitations of this air carrier are no longer whom it had issued an AOC. The assessment team necessary. Therefore, on the basis of the common reported a credible commitment by CARC to criteria, it is assessed that Jordan Aviation should be implement its corrective and preventive action plan, removed from Annex B. L 333/16 EN Official Journal of the European Union 5.12.2012

(93) Member States will verify the effective compliance with Federation (FATA) and the air carrier VIM AVIA certified relevant safety standards through the prioritisation of in the Russian Federation to address the safety concerns ramp inspections to be carried out on aircraft of this described in Commission Implementing Regulations (EC) carrier pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 965/2012. No 1197/2011 ( 1 ) and (EU) No 295/2012 ( 2).This safety assessment included visits to FATA headquarters as well as VIM AVIA headquarters, to the air carrier’s main tenance facilities at Domodedovo airport and a ramp Air Madagascar check of one aircraft of its fleet. The results of this assessment revealed that overall VIM AVIA has prog (94) The air carrier Air Madagascar is subject to operational ressed with the establishment of a safety management restrictions and is listed in Annex B pursuant to Regu system. With regard to VIMA AVIA’s corrective action lation (EC) No 390/2011.Consultations with the plans, however, it appeared that three out of the 12 competent authorities of Madagascar (ACM) and the corrective actions could not be considered to be effec Air Madagascar have since been pursued with the view tively implemented. VIM AVIA was invited to review and to get updates on progress made in the implementation complete its action plan accordingly before resuming of corrective actions. flights into the EU.

(95) ICAO carried out a Coordinated Validation Mission (99) On 20 June 2012, FATA informed the Commission that (ICVM) from 21 to 25 May 2012 which confirmed the air carrier had been reauthorized, with effect from some progress as the lack of effective implementation that date, to fly to and from the EU on grounds that it of ICAO standards was evaluated at 44,4 % down had successfully completed additional corrective actions from 70,7 %. However the mission also concluded on related to these three areas. the need to continue the effective implementation of all corrective actions, notably with regard to the provisions for the training and qualification of technical personnel, the surveillance obligations and the resolutions of safety (100) The Commission, after reviewing the additional measures concerns where respectively 67 %, 58 % and 86 % of reported, expressed concerns that the company could ICAO standards were not effectively implemented. have completed them effectively in such a short time. The attention of the Russian competent authorities was also drawn to the unsatisfactory results of a ramp inspection carried out in Spain on 26 June 2012 ( 3), (96) ACM and the air carrier Air Madagascar requested to be which pointed to deficiencies in VIM AVIA’s continuous heard by the Air Safety Committee and did so on airworthiness and maintenance departments. The Russian 20 November 2012. They presented the progress made competent authorities were also invited to provide in the implementation of their respective action plans. information on a serious incident occurred to VIM ACM also informed they have entered into a two-year AVIA on 24 June 2012. contract to obtain external technical assistance to support their safety oversight. The Air Safety Committee took note of the progress reported and welcomed the efforts made by ACM to improve its capacity to fulfil its (101) In view of the above, the Commission, EASA and certain obligations with regard to the ICAO requirements. Members of the Air Safety Committee held a meeting on 19 October 2012 with the Russian competent authorities and VIM AVIA. VIM AVIA reported that corrective measures had been undertaken and closed with regard (97) The Air Safety Committee encourages ACM to continue to all open issues identified in the final report of the its efforts towards resolution of all non-compliance safety assessment mission in Russia carried out in June findings identified during the ICVM audit carried out 2012 and provided evidence for closure actions after the by ICAO and especially in the field of the surveillance meeting. FATA informed that two investigations had of the air operators certified in Madagascar. The been opened following a serious incident occurred to Commission, assisted by the EASA and with the VIM AVIA on 24 June 2012 and provided a summary support of the Member States, is ready to carry out an of their conclusions. assessment on site once the implementation of the action plans by ACM and Air Madagascar has sufficiently advanced. (102) Spain confirmed to the Air Safety Committee that all findings of the later ramp inspections performed in Spain to VIM AVIA had been closed. Spain also Vim Avia from the Russian Federation informed about a meeting held in Madrid with VIM AVIA representatives and noted the cooperative attitude (98) The Commission, assisted by the EASA and certain of this company. Member States, carried out a safety assessment visit to

the Russian Federation from 4 to 8 June 2012 in order ( 1 ) OJ L 303, 22.11.2011, p. 14. to verify the satisfactory implementation of the measures ( 2 ) OJ L 98, 4.4.2012, p. 13. undertaken by the competent authorities of the Russian ( 3 ) No AESA-E-2012-392 5.12.2012 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 333/17

(103) Member States will verify the effective compliance with continue their efforts in addressing the safety issues relevant safety standards through the prioritisation of and will continue to closely monitor the aviation safety ramp inspections to be carried out on aircraft of this situation in Rwanda to ensure that any remaining safety carrier at European airports. Should the results of these concern is effectively addressed. ramp inspections show a repetition of safety concerns regarding the operations of VIM AVIA, the Commission will be compelled to take action under in the framework HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005. Article 1 Air carriers from Rwanda Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 is amended as follows: (104) On 9 May 2012 the Competent Authorities of Rwanda wrote to the Commission and provided evidence that Silverback Cargo Freighters’ AOC had been revoked on 1. Annex A is replaced by the text set out in Annex A to this 30 October 2009. Therefore, on the basis of the Regulation. common criteria, it is assessed that Silverback Cargo Freighters should be removed from Annex A. 2. Annex B is replaced by the text set out in Annex B to this Regulation. (105) The Commission and the Air Safety Committee notes, however, that Rwanda remains subject to a Significant Safety Concern issued following the ICAO USOAP audit Article 2 in 2007 and notified by ICAO to all States Party to the Chicago Convention. The Commission therefore This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its encourages the competent authorities of Rwanda to publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 December 2012.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President, Joaquín ALMUNIA Vice-President L 333/18 EN Official Journal of the European Union 5.12.2012

ANNEX

‘ANNEX A

LIST OF AIR CARRIERS OF WHICH ALL OPERATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO A BAN WITHIN THE EU ( 1 )

Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as Air Operator Certificate (AOC) ICAO airline indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, Number or Operating Licence State of the Operator designation number if different) Number

BLUE WING AIRLINES SRBWA-01/2002 BWI Suriname

CONSORCIO VENEZOLANO DE VCV-DB-10 VCV Bolivarian Republic of INDUSTRIAS AERONAUTICAS Y Venezuela SERVICIOS AEREOS, S.A. “CONVIASA”

MERIDIAN AIRWAYS LTD AOC 023 MAG Republic of Ghana

All air carriers certified by the auth Islamic Republic of orities with responsibility for regu Afghanistan latory oversight of Afghanistan, including

ARIANA AFGHAN AIRLINES AOC 009 AFG Islamic Republic of Afghanistan

KAM AIR AOC 001 KMF Islamic Republic of Afghanistan

PAMIR AIRLINES Unknown PIR Islamic Republic of Afghanistan

SAFI AIRWAYS AOC 181 SFW Islamic Republic of Afghanistan

All air carriers certified by the auth Republic of Angola orities with responsibility for regu latory oversight of Angola, with the exception of TAAG Angola Airlines put in Annex B, including

AEROJET AO 008-01/11 Unknown Republic of Angola

AIR26 AO 003-01/11-DCD DCD Republic of Angola

Air Gicango 009 Unknown Republic of Angola

AIR JET AO 006-01/11-MBC MBC Republic of Angola

AIR NAVE 017 Unknown Republic of Angola

ANGOLA AIR SERVICES 006 Unknown Republic of Angola

Diexim 007 Unknown Republic of Angola

FLY540 AO 004-01 FLYA Unknown Republic of Angola

GIRA GLOBO 008 GGL Republic of Angola

( 1) Air carriers listed in Annex A could be permitted to exercise traffic rights by using wet-leased aircraft of an air carrier which is not subject to an operating ban, provided that the relevant safety standards are complied with. 5.12.2012 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 333/19

HELIANG 010 Unknown Republic of Angola

HELIMALONGO AO 005-01/11 Unknown Republic of Angola

MAVEWA 016 Unknown Republic of Angola

SONAIR AO 002-01/10-SOR SOR Republic of Angola

All air carriers certified by the auth Republic of Benin orities with responsibility for regu latory oversight of Benin, including

AERO BENIN PEA No AEB Republic of Benin 014/MDCTTTATP- PR/ANAC/DEA/SCS

AFRICA AIRWAYS Unknown AFF Republic of Benin

ALAFIA JET PEA No 014/ANAC/ N/A Republic of Benin MDCTTTATP- PR/DEA/SCS

BENIN GOLF AIR PEA No 012/MDCTTP- BGL Republic of Benin PR/ANAC/DEA/SCS.

BENIN LITTORAL AIRWAYS PEA No LTL Republic of Benin 013/MDCTTTATP- PR/ANAC/DEA/SCS.

COTAIR PEA No COB Republic of Benin 015/MDCTTTATP- PR/ANAC/DEA/SCS.

ROYAL AIR PEA No 11/ANAC/ BNR Republic of Benin MDCTTP-PR/DEA/SCS

TRANS AIR BENIN PEA No TNB Republic of Benin 016/MDCTTTATP- PR/ANAC/DEA/SCS

All air carriers certified by the auth Republic of Congo orities with responsibility for regu latory oversight of the Republic of Congo, including

AERO SERVICE RAC06-002 RSR Republic of Congo

CANADIAN AIRWAYS CONGO RAC06-012 Unknown Republic of Congo

EMERAUDE RAC06-008 Unknown Republic of Congo

EQUAFLIGHT SERVICES RAC 06-003 EKA Republic of Congo

EQUAJET RAC06-007 Unknown Republic of Congo

EQUATORIAL CONGO AIRLINES S.A. RAC 06-014 Unknown Republic of Congo

MISTRAL AVIATION RAC06-011 Unknown Republic of Congo L 333/20 EN Official Journal of the European Union 5.12.2012

TRANS AIR CONGO RAC 06-001 Unknown Republic of Congo

All air carriers certified by the auth Democratic Republic of orities with responsibility for regu Congo (RDC) latory oversight of Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), including

AFRICAN AIR SERVICE COMMUTER 104/CAB/MIN/TVC/2012 Unknown Democratic Republic of Congo (RDC)

AIR FAST CONGO 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/ Unknown Democratic Republic of 0039/2010 Congo (RDC)

AIR KASAI 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/ Unknown Democratic Republic of 0053/2010 Congo (RDC)

AIR KATANGA 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/ Unknown Democratic Republic of 0056/2010 Congo (RDC)

AIR TROPIQUES 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/ Unknown Democratic Republic of 00625/2010 Congo (RDC)

BLUE AIRLINES 106/CAB/MIN/TVC/2012 BUL Democratic Republic of Congo (RDC)

BRAVO AIR CONGO 409/CAB/MIN/TC/ BRV Democratic Republic of 0090/2006 Congo (RDC)

BUSINESS AVIATION 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/ ABB Democratic Republic of 048/09 Congo (RDC)

BUSY BEE CONGO 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/ Unknown Democratic Republic of 0064/2010 Congo (RDC)

CETRACA AVIATION SERVICE 105/CAB/MIN/TVC/2012 CER Democratic Republic of Congo (RDC)

CHC STELLAVIA 409/CAB/MIN/TC/ Unknown Democratic Republic of 0050/2006 Congo (RDC)

CONGO EXPRESS 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/ EXY Democratic Republic of 083/2009 Congo (RDC)

COMPAGNIE AFRICAINE 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/ CAA Democratic Republic of D’AVIATION (CAA) 0050/2010 Congo (RDC)

DOREN AIR CONGO 102/CAB/MIN/TVC/2012 Unknown Democratic Republic of Congo (RDC)

ENTREPRISE WORLD AIRWAYS 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/ EWS Democratic Republic of (EWA) 003/08 Congo (RDC)

FilaIR 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/ FIL Democratic Republic of 037/08 Congo (RDC)

FLY CONGO 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/ Unknown Democratic Republic of 0126/2012 Congo (RDC)

GALAXY KAVATSI 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/ Unknown Democratic Republic of 027/08 Congo (RDC) 5.12.2012 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 333/21

GILEMBE AIR SOUTENANCE (GISAIR) 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/ Unknown Democratic Republic of 053/09 Congo (RDC)

GOMA EXPRESS 409/CAB/MIN/TC/ Unknown Democratic Republic of 0051/2011 Congo (RDC)

GOMAIR 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/ Unknown Democratic Republic of 011/2011 Congo (RDC)

HEWA BORA AIRWAYS (HBA) 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/ ALX Democratic Republic of 038/08 Congo (RDC)

International Trans Air Business (ITAB) 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/ Unknown Democratic Republic of 0065/2010 Congo (RDC)

JET CONGO AIRWAYS Unknown Unknown Democratic Republic of Congo (RDC)

KATANGA EXPRESS 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/ Unknown Democratic Republic of 0083/2010 Congo (RDC)

KATANGA WINGS 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/ Unknown Democratic Republic of 0092/2011 Congo (RDC)

KIN AVIA 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/ Unknown Democratic Republic of 0059/2010 Congo (RDC)

KORONGO AIRLINES 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/ Unknown Democratic Republic of 001/2011 Congo (RDC)

Lignes Aériennes Congolaises (LAC) Ministerial signature LCG Democratic Republic of (ordonnance No 78/205) Congo (RDC)

MALU AVIATION 098/CAB/MIN/TVC/2012 Unknown Democratic Republic of Congo (RDC)

MANGO AIRLINES 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/ Unknown Democratic Republic of 009/2011 Congo (RDC)

MANGO AVIATION 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/ Unknown Democratic Republic of 034/08 Congo (RDC)

SAFE AIR COMPANY 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/ Unknown Democratic Republic of 025/08 Congo (RDC)

SERVICES AIR 103/CAB/MIN/TVC/2012 Unknown Democratic Republic of Congo (RDC)

STELLAR AIRWAYS AAC/DG/DTA/TM/ Unknown Democratic Republic of 787/2011 Congo (RDC)

SWALA AVIATION 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/ Unknown Democratic Republic of 0084/2010 Congo (RDC)

TMK AIR COMMUTER 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/ Unknown Democratic Republic of 044/09 Congo (RDC)

TRACEP CONGO/TRACEP CONGO 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/ Unknown Democratic Republic of AVIATION 0085/2010 Congo (RDC) L 333/22 EN Official Journal of the European Union 5.12.2012

TRANS AIR CARGO SERVICES 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/ Unknown Democratic Republic of 073/2011 Congo (RDC)

WILL AIRLIFT 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/ Unknown Democratic Republic of 0247/2011 Congo (RDC)

WIMBI DIRA AIRWAYS 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/ WDA Democratic Republic of 039/08 Congo (RDC)

ZAABU INTERNATIONAL 409/CAB/MIN/TVC/ Unknown Democratic Republic of 049/09 Congo (RDC)

All air carriers certified by the auth Djibouti orities with responsibility for regu latory oversight of Djibouti, including

DAALLO AIRLINES Unknown DAO Djibouti

All air carriers certified by the auth Equatorial Guinea orities with responsibility for regu latory oversight of Equatorial Guinea, including

Cronos AIRLINES 2011/0004/MTTCT/ Unknown Equatorial Guinea DGAC/SOPS

CEIBA INTERCONTINENTAL 2011/0001/MTTCT/ CEL Equatorial Guinea DGAC/SOPS

Punto Azul 2012/0006/MTTCT/ Unknown Equatorial Guinea DGAC/SOPS

TANGO AIRWAYS Unknown Unknown Equatorial Guinea

All air carriers certified by the auth Eritrea orities with responsibility for regu latory oversight of Eritrea, including

ERITREAN AIRLINES AOC No 004 ERT Eritrea

NASAIR ERITREA AOC No 005 NAS Eritrea

All air carriers certified by the auth Republic of Indonesia orities with responsibility for regu latory oversight of Indonesia, with the exception of Garuda Indonesia, Airfast Indonesia, Mandala Airlines, EkspresTransportasiAntarbenua, Indonesia Air Asia and Metro Batavia, including

AIR BORN INDONESIA 135-055 Unknown Republic of Indonesia

AIR PACIFIC UTAMA 135-020 Unknown Republic of Indonesia 5.12.2012 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 333/23

ALFA TRANS DIRGANTATA 135-012 Unknown Republic of Indonesia

ANGKASA SUPER SERVICES 135-050 Unknown Republic of Indonesia

ASCO NUSA AIR 135-022 Unknown Republic of Indonesia

ASI PUDJIASTUTI 135-028 Unknown Republic of Indonesia

AVIASTAR MANDIRI 135-029 Unknown Republic of Indonesia

CITILINK INDONESIA 121-046 Unknown Republic of Indonesia

DABI AIR NUSANTARA 135-030 Unknown Republic of Indonesia

DERAYA AIR TAXI 135-013 DRY Republic of Indonesia

DERAZONA AIR SERVICE 135-010 DRZ Republic of Indonesia

DIRGANTARA AIR SERVICE 135-014 DIR Republic of Indonesia

EASTINDO 135-038 Unknown Republic of Indonesia

Enggang Air Service 135-045' Unknown Republic of Indonesia

Ersa Eastern Aviation 135-047 Unknown Republic of Indonesia

GATARI AIR SERVICE 135-018 GHS Republic of Indonesia

HEAVY LIFT 135-042 Unknown Republic of Indonesia

INDONESIA AIR TRANSPORT 121-034 IDA Republic of Indonesia

INTAN ANGKASA AIR SERVICE 135-019 Unknown Republic of Indonesia

JAYAWIJAYA DIRGANTARA 121-044 Unknown Republic of Indonesia

JOHNLIN AIR TRANSPORT 135-043 Unknown Republic of Indonesia

KAL STAR 121-037 KLS Republic of Indonesia

KARTIKA AIRLINES 121-003 KAE Republic of Indonesia

KURA-KURA AVIATION 135-016 KUR Republic of Indonesia

LION MENTARI AIRLINES 121-010 LNI Republic of Indonesia

MANUNGGAL AIR SERVICE 121-020 Unknown Republic of Indonesia

Matthew Air Nusantara 135-048 Unknown Republic of Indonesia

MERPATI NUSANTARA AIRLINES 121-002 MNA Republic of Indonesia

MIMIKA AIR 135-007 Unknown Republic of Indonesia

NATIONAL UTILITY HELICOPTER 135-011 Unknown Republic of Indonesia L 333/24 EN Official Journal of the European Union 5.12.2012

NUSANTARA AIR CHARTER 121-022 Unknown Republic of Indonesia

NUSANTARA BUANA AIR 135-041 Unknown Republic of Indonesia

PACIFIC ROYALE AIRWAYS 121-045 Unknown Republic of Indonesia

PEGASUS AIR SERVICES 135-036 Unknown Republic of Indonesia

PELITA AIR SERVICE 121-008 PAS Republic of Indonesia

PENERBANGAN ANGKASA SEMESTA 135-026 Unknown Republic of Indonesia

PURA WISATA BARUNA 135-025 Unknown Republic of Indonesia

RIAU AIRLINES 121-016 RIU Republic of Indonesia

SAYAP GARUDA INDAH 135-004 Unknown Republic of Indonesia

SKY AVIATION 135-044 Unknown Republic of Indonesia

SMAC 135-015 SMC Republic of Indonesia

SRIWIJAYA AIR 121-035 SJY Republic of Indonesia

SURVEI UDARA PENAS 135-006 Unknown Republic of Indonesia

SURYA AIR 135-046 Unknown Republic of Indonesia

TransNusa Aviation Mandiri 121-048 Unknown Republic of Indonesia

TRANSWISATA PRIMA AVIATION 135-021 Unknown Republic of Indonesia

TRAVEL EXPRESS AVIATION 121-038 XAR Republic of Indonesia SERVICE

TRAVIRA UTAMA 135-009 Unknown Republic of Indonesia

TRI MG INTRA ASIA AIRLINES 121-018 TMG Republic of Indonesia

TRIGANA AIR SERVICE 121-006 TGN Republic of Indonesia

UNINDO 135-040 Unknown Republic of Indonesia

WING ABADI AIRLINES 121-012 WON Republic of Indonesia

All air carriers certified by the auth Republic of Kazakhstan orities with responsibility for regu latory oversight of Kazakhstan, with the exception of Air Astana, including

AIR ALMATY AK-0453-11 LMY Republic of Kazakhstan

AIR TRUST AIRCOMPANY AK-0455-12 RTR Republic of Kazakhstan

ASIA CONTINENTAL Airlines AK-0317-12 CID Republic of Kazakhstan 5.12.2012 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 333/25

ATMA AIRLINES AK-0437-10 AMA Republic of Kazakhstan

AVIA-JAYNAR/avia-zhaynar AK-067-12 SAP Republic of Kazakhstan

BEYBARS AIRCOMPANY AK-0442-11 BBS Republic of Kazakhstan

BEK AIR AK-0463-12 BEK Republic of Kazakhstan

BURUNDAYAVIA AIRLINES AK-0456-12 BRY Republic of Kazakhstan

COMLUX-KZ AK-0449-11 KAZ Republic of Kazakhstan

DETA AIR AK-0458-12 DET Republic of Kazakhstan

EAST WING AK-0465-12 EWZ Republic of Kazakhstan

LUK AERO (FORMER EASTERN AK-0464-12 LIS Republic of Kazakhstan EXPRESS)

EURO-ASIA AIR AK-0441-11 EAK Republic of Kazakhstan

EURO-ASIA AIR INTERNATIONAL AK-0445-11 KZE Republic of Kazakhstan

FLY JET KZ AK-0446-11 FJK Republic of Kazakhstan

INVESTAVIA AK-0447-11 TLG Republic of Kazakhstan

IRTYSH AIR AK-0439-11 MZA Republic of Kazakhstan

JET AIRLINES AK-0459-12 SOZ Republic of Kazakhstan

JET ONE AK-0468-12 JKZ Republic of Kazakhstan

KAZAIR JET AK-0442-11 KEJ Republic of Kazakhstan

KAZAIRTRANS AIRLINE AK-0466-12 KUY Republic of Kazakhstan

KAZAVIASPAS AK-0452-11 KZS Republic of Kazakhstan

MEGA Airlines AK-0462-12 MGK Republic of Kazakhstan

Prime aviation AK-0448-11 PKZ Republic of Kazakhstan

SAMAL AIR AK-0454-12 SAV Republic of Kazakhstan

SEMEYAVIA AK-450-11 SMK Republic of Kazakhstan

SCAT AK-0460-12 VSV Republic of Kazakhstan

ZHETYSU AIRCOMPANY AK-0438-11 JTU Republic of Kazakhstan

All air carriers certified by the auth Kyrgyz Republic orities with responsibility for regu latory oversight of the Kyrgyz Republic, including L 333/26 EN Official Journal of the European Union 5.12.2012

AIR MANAS 17 MBB Kyrgyz Republic

Avia Traffic Company 23 AVJ Kyrgyz Republic

CENTRAL ASIAN AVIATION 13 CBK Kyrgyz Republic SERVICES (CAAS)

Click Airways 11 CGK Kyrgyz Republic

STATE AVIATION ENTERPRISE 20 DAM Kyrgyz Republic UNDER THE MINISTRY OF EMERGENCY SITUATIONS (SAEMES)

AIR BISHKEK (FORMERLY EASTOK 15 EEA Kyrgyz Republic AVIA)

KYRGYZ TRANS AVIA 31 KTC Kyrgyz Republic

Kyrgyzstan 03 LYN Kyrgyz Republic

MANAS AIRWAYS 42 BAM Kyrgyz Republic

S GROUP AVIATION 6 SGL Kyrgyz Republic

SKY KG AIRLINES 41 KGK Kyrgyz Republic

Sky Way air 39 SAB Kyrgyz Republic

SUPREME AVIATION 40 SGK Kyrgyz Republic

VALOR AIR 07 VAC Kyrgyz Republic

All air carriers certified by the auth Liberia orities with responsibility for regu latory oversight of Liberia.

All air carriers certified by the auth Republic of Gabon orities with responsibility for regu latory oversight of the Republic of Gabon, with the exception of Gabon Airlines, Afrijet and SN2AG put in Annex B, including

AFRIC AVIATION 010/MTAC/ANAC- Unknown Republic of Gabon G/DSA

AIR SERVICES SA 004/MTAC/ANAC- RVS Republic of Gabon G/DSA

AIR TOURIST (ALLEGIANCE) 007/MTAC/ANAC- LGE Republic of Gabon G/DSA

NATIONALE ET REGIONALE 008/MTAC/ANAC- NRG Republic of Gabon TRANSPORT (NATIONALE) G/DSA

SCD AVIATION 005/MTAC/ANAC- SCY Republic of Gabon G/DSA 5.12.2012 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 333/27

SKY GABON 009/MTAC/ANAC- SKG Republic of Gabon G/DSA

SOLENTA AVIATION GABON 006/MTAC/ANAC- Unknown Republic of Gabon G/DSA

All air carriers certified by the auth Republic of Mozambique orities with responsibility for regu latory oversight of the Republic of Mozambique, including

Aero-Servicos sarl MOZ-08 Unknown Republic of Mozambique

Aerovisao de Mozambique Unknown Unknown Republic of Mozambique

CFA Mozambique MOZ-10 Unknown Republic of Mozambique

CFM-Transportes e trabalho aereo sA MOZ-07 Unknown Republic of Mozambique

Emilio Air Charter lda MOZ-05 Unknown Republic of Mozambique

ETA Air Charter LDA MOZ-04 Unknown Republic of Mozambique

Helicopteros Capital MOZ-11 Unknown Republic of Mozambique

KAYA AIRLINES MOZ-09 Unknown Republic of Mozambique

Mozambique Airlines (linhas aereas de MOZ-01 LAM Republic of Mozambique moçambique)

Mozambique Express/MEX MOZ-02 MXE Republic of Mozambique

Unique Air Charter MOZ-13 Unknown Republic of Mozambique

Safari Air MOZ-12 Unknown Republic of Mozambique

VR Cropsprayers lda MOZ-06 Unknown Republic of Mozambique

All air carriers certified by the auth Republic of the Philippines orities with responsibility for regu latory oversight of the Philippines, including

AEROEQUIPEMENT AVIATION Unknown Unknown Republic of the Philippines

AEROMAJESTIC Unknown Unknown Republic of the Philippines

Aerowurks Aerial SprAying Services 2010030 Unknown Republic of the Philippines

AIR ASIA PHILIPPINES Unknown Unknown Republic of the Philippines

AIRGURUS Unknown Unknown Republic of the Philippines

Air Philippines Corporation 2009006 GAP Republic of the Philippines

AIR WOLF AVIATION INC. 200911 Unknown Republic of the Philippines

Airtrack Agricultural Corporation 2010027 Unknown Republic of the Philippines L 333/28 EN Official Journal of the European Union 5.12.2012

Asia Aircraft Overseas Philippines Inc. 4AN9800036 Unknown Republic of the Philippines

Aviation Technology Innovators, Inc. 4AN2007005 Unknown Republic of the Philippines

AVIATOUR’S FLY’N INC. 200910 Unknown Republic of the Philippines

AYALA aviation corp. 4AN9900003 Unknown Republic of the Philippines

Beacon Unknown Unknown Republic of the Philippines

BENDICE transport management inc. 4AN2008006 Unknown Republic of the Philippines

Canadian helicopters philippines inc. 4AN9800025 Unknown Republic of the Philippines

Cebu Pacific Air 2009002 CEB Republic of the Philippines

CERTEZA INFOSYSTEMS CORP. 2011040 Unknown Republic of the Philippines

Chemtrad Aviation Corporation 2009018 Unknown Republic of the Philippines

CM aero SERVICES 20110401 Unknown Republic of the Philippines

Corporate Air Unknown Unknown Republic of the Philippines

Cyclone airways 4AN9900008 Unknown Republic of the Philippines

Far East Aviation Services 2009013 Unknown Republic of the Philippines

F.F. Cruz and Company, Inc. 2009017 Unknown Republic of the Philippines

Huma Corporation 2009014 Unknown Republic of the Philippines

Inaec Aviation Corp. 4AN2002004 Unknown Republic of the Philippines

INTERISLAND AIRLINES 2010023 Unknown Republic of the Philippines

Island Aviation 2009009 SOY Republic of the Philippines

Island HELICOPTER SERVICES 2011043 SOY Republic of the Philippines

ISLAND TRANSVOYAGER 2010022 Unknown Republic of the Philippines

Lion Air, Incorporated 2009019 Unknown Republic of the Philippines

Macro asia air taxi services 2010029 Unknown Republic of the Philippines

MID-SEA EXPRESS Unknown Republic of the Philippines

Mindanao Rainbow Agricultural Devel 2009016 Unknown Republic of the Philippines opment Services

MISIBIS AVIATION & DEVELOPMENT 2010020 Unknown Republic of the Philippines CORP

NORTHSKY AIR INC. 2011042 Unknown Republic of the Philippines 5.12.2012 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 333/29

Omni aviation corp. 2010033 Unknown Republic of the Philippines

Pacific East Asia Cargo Airlines, Inc. 4AS9800006 PEC Republic of the Philippines

Pacific Airways Corporation 4AN9700007 Unknown Republic of the Philippines

Pacific Alliance Corporation 4AN2006001 Unknown Republic of the Philippines

Philippine Airlines 2009001 PAL Republic of the Philippines

Philippine Agricultural aviation corp. 4AN9800015 Unknown Republic of the Philippines

Royal air charter services Inc. 2010024 Unknown Republic of the Philippines

Royal Star Aviation, Inc. 2010021 Unknown Republic of the Philippines

SKYJET Unknown Unknown Republic of the Philippines

SOUTH EAST ASIA AIRLINE INC. 2009 004 Unknown Republic of the Philippines (SEAIR)

SOUTHERN AIR FLIGHT SERVICES 2011045 Unknown Republic of the Philippines

Southstar aviation company, inc. 4AN9800037 Unknown Republic of the Philippines

SOUTHWEST AIR CORPORATION Unknown Unknown Republic of the Philippines

Spirit of Manila Airlines Corporation 2009008 MNP Republic of the Philippines

Subic international air charter 4AN9900010 Unknown Republic of the Philippines

Subic seaplane, inc. 4AN2000002 Unknown Republic of the Philippines

Topflite airways, inc. 4AN9900012 Unknown Republic of the Philippines

Transglobal Airways Corporation 2009007 TCU Republic of the Philippines

World aviation, corp. Unknown Unknown Republic of the Philippines

WcC Aviation Company 2009015 Unknown Republic of the Philippines

YOkota aviation, inc. Unknown Unknown Republic of the Philippines

ZenitH Air, Inc. 2009012 Unknown Republic of the Philippines

Zest Airways Incorporated 2009003 RIT Republic of the Philippines

All air carriers certified by the auth Sao Tome and Principe orities with responsibility for regu latory oversight of Sao Tome and Principe, including

AFRICA CONNECTION 10/AOC/2008 Unknown Sao Tome and Principe L 333/30 EN Official Journal of the European Union 5.12.2012

BRITISH GULF INTERNATIONAL 01/AOC/2007 BGI Sao Tome and Principe COMPANY LTD

EXECUTIVE JET SERVICES 03/AOC/2006 EJZ Sao Tome and Principe

GLOBAL AVIATION OPERATION 04/AOC/2006 Unknown Sao Tome and Principe

GOLIAF AIR 05/AOC/2001 GLE Sao Tome and Principe

ISLAND OIL EXPLORATION 01/AOC/2008 Unknown Sao Tome and Principe

STP AIRWAYS 03/AOC/2006 STP Sao Tome and Principe

TRANSAFRIK INTERNATIONAL LTD 02/AOC/2002 TFK Sao Tome and Principe

TRANSCARG 01/AOC/2009 Unknown Sao Tome and Principe

TRANSLIZ AVIATION (TMS) 02/AOC/2007 TMS Sao Tome and Principe

All air carriers certified by the auth Sierra Leone orities with responsibility for regu latory oversight of Sierra Leone, including

AIR RUM, Ltd Unknown RUM Sierra Leone

DESTINY AIR SERVICES, Ltd Unknown DTY Sierra Leone

HEAVYLIFT CARGO Unknown Unknown Sierra Leone

ORANGE AIR SIERRA LEONE LTD Unknown ORJ Sierra Leone

PARAMOUNT AIRLINES, Ltd Unknown PRR Sierra Leone

SEVEN FOUR EIGHT AIR SERVICES Unknown SVT Sierra Leone LTD

TEEBAH AIRWAYS Unknown Unknown Sierra Leone

All air carriers certified by the auth Republic of Sudan orities with responsibility for regu latory oversight of Sudan, including

ALFA AIRLINES 054 AAJ Republic of the Sudan

ALMAJAL AVIATION SERVICE 015 MGG Republic of the Sudan

ALMAJARA AVIATION Unknown MJA Republic of the Sudan 5.12.2012 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 333/31

ATTICO AIRLINES (TRANS ATTICO) 023 ETC Republic of the Sudan

AZZA TRANSPORT COMPANY 012 AZZ Republic of the Sudan

BADER AIRLINES 035 BDR Republic of the Sudan

FOURTY EIGHT AVIATION 054 WHB Republic of the Sudan

GREEN FLAG AVIATION 017 Unkown Republic of the Sudan

MARSLAND COMPANY 040 MSL Republic of the Sudan

NOVA AIRLINES 001 NOV Republic of the Sudan

Sudan Airways Unknown SUD Republic of the Sudan

SUDANESE STATES AVIATION 010 SNV Republic of the Sudan COMPANY

SUN AIR COMPANY 051 SNR Republic of the Sudan

TARCO AIRLINES 056 Unknown Republic of the Sudan

All air carriers certified by the auth Swaziland orities with responsibility for regu latory oversight of Swaziland, including

SWAZILAND AIRLINK Unknown SZL Swaziland

All air carriers certified by the auth Zambia orities with responsibility for regu latory oversight of Zambia, including

ZAMBEZI AIRLINES Z/AOC/001/2009 ZMA Zambia L 333/32 EN Official Journal of the European Union 5.12.2012

ANNEX B

LIST OF AIR CARRIERS OF WHICH OPERATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO OPERATIONAL RESTRICTIONS WITHIN THE EU ( 1 )

Name of the legal Registration mark(s) and, entity of the air carrier ICAO airline Air Operator Certificate when available, as indicated on its designation State of the Operator Aircraft type restricted State of registry (AOC) Number construction serial AOC (and its trading number number(s) name, if different)

AIR KORYO GAC-AOC/KOR-01 KOR DPRK All fleet with the All fleet with the DPRK exception of: 2 exception of: aircraft of type P-632, P-633 TU- 204

AFRIJET ( 1 ) 002/MTAC/ANAC- ABS Republic of Gabon All fleet with the All fleet with the Republic of Gabon G/DSA exception of: 2 exception of: aircraft of type TR-LGV; TR-LGY; TR- Falcon 50, 2 aircraft AFJ; TR-AFR of type Falcon 900

AIR ASTANA ( 2) AK-0443-11 KZR Kazakhstan All fleet with the All fleet with the Aruba (Kingdom of exception of: aircraft exception of: aircraft the Netherlands) of type B-767, within the B-767 aircraft of type fleet, as mentioned B-757, aircraft of on the AOC, aircraft type A319/320/321, within the B-757 aircraft of type fleet, aircraft within Fokker 50 the A319/320/321 fleet, as mention don the AOC aircraft within the Fokker 50 fleet, as mentioned on the AOC

AIRLIFT AOC 017 ALE Republic of Ghana All fleet with the All fleet with the Republic of Ghana INTERNATIONAL exception of: 2 exception of: 9G-TOP (GH) LtD aircraft of type and 9G-RAC DC8-63F

AIR 5R-M01/2009 MDG Madagascar All fleet with the All fleet with the Republic of MADAGASCAR exception of: 2 exception of: Madagascar aircraft of type 5R-MFH, 5R-MFI, Boeing B-737-300, 2 5R-MJE, 5R-MJF, aircraft of type ATR 5R-MJG, 5R-MVT, 72-500, 1 aircraft of 5R-MGC, 5R-MGD, type ATR 42-500, 1 5R-MGF aircraft of type ATR 42-320 and 3 aircraft of type DHC 6-300

Air Service 06-819/TA- KMD Comoros All fleet with the All fleet with the Comoros Comores 15/DGACM exception of: LET exception of: 410 UVP D6-CAM (851336)

GABON 001/MTAC/ANAC GBK Republic of Gabon All fleet with the All fleet with the Republic of Gabon AIRLINES ( 3 ) exception of: 1 exception of: TR-LHP aircraft of type Boeing B-767-200

( 1) Air carriers listed in Annex B could be permitted to exercise traffic rights by using wet-leased aircraft of an air carrier which is not subject to an operating ban, provided that the relevant safety standards are complied with. 5.12.2012 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 333/33

IRAN AIR ( 4 ) FS100 IRA Islamic Republic of All fleet with the All fleet with the Islamic Republic of Iran exception of: 14 exception of: Iran aircraft of type A- EP-IBA 300, 8 aircraft of EP-IBB type A-310, 1 EP-IBC aircraft B-737 EP-IBD EP-IBG EP-IBH EP-IBI EP-IBJ EP-IBM EP-IBN EP-IBO EP-IBS EP-IBT EP-IBV EP-IBX EP-IBZ EP-ICE EP-ICF EP-IBK EP-IBL EP-IBP EP-IBQ EP-AGA

NOUVELLE AIR 003/MTAC/ANAC- NVS Republic of Gabon All fleet with the All fleet with the Republic of Gabon; AFFAIRES GABON G/DSA exception of: 1 exception of: Republic of South (SN2AG) aircraft of type Chal TR-AAG, ZS-AFG Africa lenger CL-601, 1 aircraft of type HS-125-800

TAAG ANGOLA 001 DTA Republic of All fleet with the All fleet with the Republic of Angola AIRLINES Angola exception of: 5 exception of: aircraft of type D2-TED, D2-TEE, Boeing B-777 and 4 D2-TEF, D2-TEG, aircraft of type D2-TEH, D2-TBF, Boeing B-737-700 D2-TBG, D2-TBH, D2-TBJ

(1 ) Afrijet is only allowed to use the specific aircraft mentioned for its current operations within the European Union. (2 ) Air Astana is only allowed for their current operations within the EU to use the specific aircraft types listed above, provided (1) they are registered in Aruba and (2) all changes to the AOC are timely submitted to the Commission and to Eurocontrol. (3 ) Gabon Airlines is only allowed to use the specific aircraft mentioned for its current operations within the European Community. (4 ) Iran Air is allowed to operate to the European Union using the specific aircraft under the conditions set out in recital (69) Regulation (EU) No 590/2010, OJ L 170, 6.7.2010, p. 15.’