DOCSLIB.ORG

3669 MYTHS PT/Bp

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
3669 MYTHS PT/Bp 1111 2 3 4 5 THE MYTHS WE LIVE BY 6 7 8 9 1011 1 2 3 4 5111 In The Myths We Live By, Mary Midgley argues in her customary brilliant 6 prose that myths are neither lies nor mere stories but a network of powerful 7 symbols that suggest particular ways of interpreting the world. She spells 8 out how we go wrong about several of the most powerful, such as the 9 myth of the Social Contract, and points out how profoundly some of our 20111 strongest myths today are shaped by our favourite technologies, notably 1 the microscope and the computer. There is also the myth of progress – 2 now disguised as evolution – the myth of a body quite separate from the 3 mind, and the myth of omnicompetent science. 4 Drawing shrewdly on a wealth of examples such as the unhelpfulness of 5 memes – the alleged genes of culture – as explanations of social change 6 and the way in which current hopes for biotechnology are repeating the 7 errors of the alchemists, she spells out what goes wrong when we try to 8 apply the atomistic metaphors of science to the large-scale problems of our 9 lives. She does not, however, blame science itself for this. Instead, she deftly 30111 shows how its name is unfairly blackened when we pressgang it into the 1 wrong places. 2 A tour de force of clear thinking on why we are more than the sum of 3 our molecules, The Myths We Live By is essential reading for anyone 4 concerned about how we should understand the world today. 5 6 Mary Midgley is a moral philosopher and the author of many books 7 including Wickedness, Evolution as a Religion, The Ethical Primate, Science 8 as Salvation, Utopias, Dolphins and Computers, and Science and Poetry. 9 All are published by Routledge. 40111 1 2 3 44111 1111 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011 1 2 3 4 5111 6 7 8 9 20111 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30111 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 40111 1 2 3 44111 1111 2 3 4 5 THE MYTHS 6 7 WE LIVE BY 8 9 1011 1 2 3 4 Mary Midgley 5111 6 7 8 9 20111 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30111 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 40111 1 I~ ~~o~f!;n~~~up 2 LONDON AND NEW YORK 3 44111 1111 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011 1 2 3 4 5111 6 7 First published 2003 by Routledge 8 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN 9 52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA 20111 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business 1 © 2003 Mary Midgley 2 Typeset in Galliard by 3 Florence Production Ltd, Stoodleigh, Devon 4 5 The Open Access version of this book, available at 6 www.taylorfrancis.com, has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 license. 7 8 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library 9 30111 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data 1 Midgley, Mary, 1919– The myths we live by / Mary Midgley. 2 p. cm. 3 Includes bibliographical references and index. 4 1. Myth. 2. Symbolism. 3. Philosophy. I. Title. 5 BL304.M53 2003 6 191–dc21 2002037168 7 8 ISBN 13: 978-0-415-30906-6 (hbk) 9 40111 1 2 3 44111 1111 2 3 4 5 FOR EVA 6 IN RETURN FOR MANY 7 WONDERFUL MYTHS 8 9 1011 1 2 3 4 5111 6 7 8 9 20111 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30111 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 40111 1 2 3 44111 1111 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011 1 2 3 4 5111 6 7 8 9 20111 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30111 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 40111 1 2 3 44111 1111 2 3 4 5 CONTENTS 6 7 8 9 1011 1 2 3 4 5111 Acknowledgements ix 6 7 8 1 How myths work 1 9 20111 2 Our place in the world 7 1 3 Progress, science and modernity 13 2 3 4 Thought has many forms 21 4 5 The aims of reduction 29 5 6 6 Dualistic dilemmas 36 7 8 7 Motives, materialism and megalomania 43 9 8 What action is 47 30111 1 9 Tidying the inner scene: why memes? 56 2 3 10 The sleep of reason produces monsters 61 4 11 Getting rid of the ego 68 5 6 12 Cultural evolution? 75 7 13 Selecting the selectors 82 8 9 14 Is reason sex-linked? 88 40111 1 15 The journey from freedom to desolation 94 2 16 Biotechnology and the yuk factor 102 3 44111 17 The new alchemy 108 vii CONTENTS 1111 18 The supernatural engineer 114 2 3 19 Heaven and earth, an awkward history 122 4 20 Science looks both ways 128 5 6 21 Are you an animal? 135 7 8 22 Problems about parsimony 142 9 23 Denying animal consciousness 146 1011 1 24 Beasts versus the biosphere? 153 2 25 Some practical dilemmas 158 3 4 26 Problems of living with otherness 163 5111 6 27 Changing ideas of wildness 169 7 8 Notes 176 9 20111 Index 185 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30111 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 40111 1 2 3 44111 viii 1111 2 3 4 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 6 7 8 9 1011 1 2 3 4 5111 The theme of this book is the crucial importance of symbolism in all our 6 thought and the resulting need to take our imaginative life seriously, even 7 when we are dealing with what seem to be prosaic subjects. 8 Because I wanted to concentrate on this issue of symbolism, I have 9 brought together here a number of articles in which I have previously dealt 20111 with that topic, re-working them in a way that I hope will bring out its 1 importance. Since the sources of these articles are rather widespread, I 2 would like to thank a wide variety of people who have helped me in my 3 efforts to understand it. I have had a great deal of help from many colleagues 4 who attended the very interesting conferences out of which several of these 5 papers grew. Many good suggestions have come from the staff of the 6 Hastings Center, to which I have made a couple of visits, and especially 7 from Strachan Donnelley. My son David and my colleagues at the now- 8 defunct Philosophy Department of Newcastle University have always helped 9 me greatly, and in recent times I have learnt a great deal from discussions 30111 with John Ziman, Steven and Hilary Rose, James Lovelock, Evelyn Fox- 1 Keller, Anne Primavesi, Martin Lockley, Raymond Tallis and Andrew Brown. 2 Finally I would like to thank the editors and publishers of the books 3 and journals in which these papers first appeared – not just for giving 4 me permission to reprint them, but for their help and support during the 5 process of publication. 6 7 These sources are as follows: 8 The first four chapters are based on a lecture called ‘The Myths We Live 9 By’, which I delivered as part of an Amnesty Series, ‘The Values of Science’, 40111 in 1997. It was published in a book with that name, edited by Wes Williams, 1 in 1999 by the Westview Press, Colorado. 2 Chapters 5 to 7 on an article called ‘Reductive Megalomania’, which 3 appeared in Nature’s Imagination: The Frontiers of Scientific Vision, edited 44111 by John Cornwell and published by Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995. ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1111 Chapter 8 on ‘Do We Even Act?’ which is forthcoming in a Symposium 2 Volume, ed. D. A. Rees and S. P. R. Rose, to be published by Cambridge 3 University Press, 2004. 4 Chapters 9 to 11 on ‘Why Memes?’, which appeared in Alas, Poor 5 Darwin: Arguments against Evolutionary Psychology, edited by Hilary and 6 Steven Rose and published by Jonathan Cape, London, 2000. 7 Chapters 12 and 13 on ‘The Evolution of Cultural Entities’, published 8 in the Proceedings of the British Academy, no. 112, 2002, pp. 119–33, and 9 in The Evolution of Cultural Entities, edited by M. Wheeler, J. Ziman and 1011 M. Boden and published by British Academy and Oxford University Press, 1 London and Oxford, 2002, pp. 119–132. 2 Chapters 14 and 15 on ‘The Soul’s Successors: Philosophy and the 3 “Body”’, which appeared in Religion and the Body, edited by Sarah Coakley, 4 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997. 5111 Chapters 16 to 18 on ‘Biotechnology and Monstrosity: Why We Should 6 Pay Attention to the “Yuk” Factor’, which appeared in the Hastings Center 7 Report for September–October 2000, vol. 30, no. 5. 8 Chapters 19 and 20 on ‘Heaven And Earth, an Awkward History’, which 9 appeared in Philosophy Now, December 2001–January 2002. 20111 Chapters 21 to 23 on ‘Are You an Animal?’, which appeared in Animal 1 Experimentation: The Consensus Changes, edited by Gill Langley and 2 published by Macmillan, London, 1999. 3 Chapters 24 and 25 on ‘Beasts versus the Biosphere?’, which appeared 4 in Environmental Values, vol.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Non-Duality in Ken Wilber's Integral Philosophy
    NON-DUALITY IN KEN WILBER’S INTEGRAL PHILOSOPHY: A CRITICAL APPRAISAL AND ALTERNATIVE PHYSICALIST PERSPECTIVE OF MYSTICAL CONSCIOUSNESS JEREMY JOHN JACOBS 2009 Ken Wilber Cover Photo: Denver Integral and Ken Wilber Meetup Group (http://www.meetup.com/denver- integral/photos/?photold=716584&photoAlbumld=102985. Accessed 20 February 2009). NON-DUALITY IN KEN WILBER’S INTEGRAL PHILOSOPHY: A CRITICAL APPRAISAL AND ALTERNATIVE PHYSICALIST PERSPECTIVE OF MYSTICAL CONSCIOUSNESS by JEREMY JOHN JACOBS Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF THEOLOGY in the subject CHRISTIAN SPIRITUALITY at the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA Promoter PROFESSOR C E T KOURIE February 2009 Kenneth Earl Wilber (1949 - ) (theosophist.wordpress.com) Student Number: 3279-583-1 I declare that NON-DUALITY IN KEN WILBER’S INTEGRAL PHILOSOPHY: A CRITICAL APPRAISAL AND ALTERNATIVE PHYSICALIST PERSPECTIVE OF MYSTICAL CONSCIOUSNESS is my own work and that all sources that I have used or quoted have been indicated and acknowledged by means of complete references. _________________________ ______________ Signature Date Jeremy John Jacobs i DEDICATION To Kim and St John ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My deepest gratitude goes to my wife Kim for her endless patience, encouragement, and support. I gratefully acknowledge Professor Celia Kourie’s professionalism. Her courteous manner of guidance and correction, and also the hospitality she extended to my alternative perspectives are an indication of her academic integrity. Special thanks to my sister Tania Jacobs who typed up reams of notes that I had gathered over the years, and finally my friend Andre Croucamp whose brilliant mind inspired me to think beyond the strictures of my creeds.
    [Show full text]
  • Francois Jacob Memorial
    RETROSPECTIVE RETROSPECTIVE Francois Jacob memorial Arthur B. Pardee1 Department of Adult Oncology, Dana-Farber Institute, Boston, MA 02115 Dr. Francois Jacob is one of a handful of the DNA would integrate into the bacterial chro- 20th century’smostdistinguishedlifescien- mosome and remain dormant or, at other tists. His research with Dr. Jacques Monod, times, would kill the cell. like that of Watson and Crick, provided the Jacob’s next major contribution, in collab- foundations for understanding mechanisms oration with Dr. Jacques Monod, was to in- of genetic regulation of life processes such vestigate how a gene is regulated. Remark- as cell differentiation and defects in diseases. ably, native E. coli synthesize β-galactosidase Jacob joined the College de France in 1964 only when lactose is available. Some mutated and shared the Nobel Prize in Physiology bacteria can make the enzyme in the absence or Medicine 1965 with Jacques Monod of inducer. Monod’s initial idea was that and Andre Lwoff. He was elected to the these constitutive bacteria activate the gene National Academy of Sciences (NAS) USA by synthesizing an intracellular lactose-like in 1969. inducer molecule. Jacob was born in 1920 in a French Jewish To investigate this model, interrupted family; his grandfather was a four-star gen- mating was applied to bring the β-galactosi- eral. He began to study medicine before dase gene of a donor bacterium into a consti- World War II, in which he served as a mil- tutive receptor. According to the induction itary officer in the Free French Army and was model, the mated cell should produce en- badly wounded in an air raid.
    [Show full text]
  • Postgraduate/Distance Learning Assignment Coversheet & Feedback Form
    Postgraduate/Distance Learning Assignment coversheet & feedback form THIS SHEET MUST BE THE FIRST PAGE OF THE ASSIGNMENT YOU ARE SUBMITTING (DO NOT SEND AS A SEPARATE FILE) For completion by the student: Student Name: SAMANTHA JANE HOLLAND Student University Email: [email protected] Module code: Student ID number: Educational support needs: 1001693 Yes/No Module title: DISSERTATION Assignment title: OTHAs AND ENVIRONMENT IN ANIMAL ETHICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL PHILOSOPHY: ONTOLOGY AND ETHICAL MOTIVATION BEYOND THE DICHOTOMIES OF ANTHROPOCENTRISM Assignment due date: 2 April 2013 This assignment is for the 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th module of the degree N/A Word count: 22,000 WORDS I confirm that this is my original work and that I have adhered to the University policy on plagiarism. Signed …………………………………………………………… Assignment Mark 1st Marker’s Provisional mark 2nd Marker’s/Moderator’s provisional mark External Examiner’s mark (if relevant) Final Mark NB. All marks are provisional until confirmed by the Final Examination Board. For completion by Marker 1 : Comments: Marker’s signature: Date: For completion by Marker 2/Moderator: Comments: Marker’s Signature: Date: External Examiner’s comments (if relevant) External Examiner’s Signature: Date: ii OTHAs AND ENVIRONMENT IN ANIMAL ETHICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL PHILOSOPHY: ONTOLOGY AND ETHICAL MOTIVATION BEYOND THE DICHOTOMIES OF ANTHROPOCENTRISM Samantha Jane Holland March 2013 Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MA Nature University of Wales, Trinity Saint David Master’s Degrees by Examination and Dissertation Declaration Form. 1. This work has not previously been accepted in substance for any degree and is not being concurrently submitted in candidature for any degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Persp V1n2 Final4pdf
    MODERN SCIENCE AND THE SEARCH FOR TRUTH Brian Tonks—Department of Physics have pondered the question, “What is truth?” for many years. My I intellectual journey has convinced me that truth comes in many ways through a variety of sources. I began my schooling believing that scientists were searching for the truth, but my undergraduate training included classes in the history and philosophy of science that disillusioned me towards the scientific process. Then my service in the United States Navy showed me the practical utility of scientific principles, and my graduate studies provided real experience in how science really works. For five years I was involved in nearly all facets of the scientific process. My adult life spans the period of the Voyager missions to the outer planets, the Viking, Pathfinder, and Global Surveyor missions to Mars, and the Pioneer and Magellan missions to Venus. These missions demonstrated the power of scientific observation. Before Voyager, we knew little about the outer planets and even less about their satellites. Even in the largest ground-based telescopes, these appeared as mere pinpoints of light. Voyager revealed them as real worlds with actual, albeit bizarre, geology. Years of speculation were dispelled in a relative moment, reminding me of the Prophet Joseph Smith’s state- ment, “Could you gaze into heaven five minutes, you would know more than you would by reading all that was written on the subject” (History I have come full of the Church, 6:50). I have come full circle, believing today that science is an important source of truth.
    [Show full text]
  • Quiet Debut'' of the Double Helix: a Bibliometric and Methodological
    Journal of the History of Biology Ó Springer 2009 DOI 10.1007/s10739-009-9183-2 Revisiting the ‘‘Quiet Debut’’ of the Double Helix: A Bibliometric and Methodological note on the ‘‘Impact’’ of Scientific Publications YVES GINGRAS De´partement d’histoire Universite´ du Que´bec a` Montre´al C.P. 8888, Suc. Centre-Ville Montreal, QC H3C-3P8 Canada E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. The object of this paper is two-fold: first, to show that contrary to what seem to have become a widely accepted view among historians of biology, the famous 1953 first Nature paper of Watson and Crick on the structure of DNA was widely cited – as compared to the average paper of the time – on a continuous basis from the very year of its publication and over the period 1953–1970 and that the citations came from a wide array of scientific journals. A systematic analysis of the bibliometric data thus shows that Watson’s and Crick’s paper did in fact have immediate and long term impact if we define ‘‘impact’’ in terms of comparative citations with other papers of the time. In this precise sense it did not fall into ‘‘relative oblivion’’ in the scientific community. The second aim of this paper is to show, using the case of the reception of the Watson–Crick and Jacob–Monod papers as concrete examples, how large scale bibliometric data can be used in a sophisticated manner to provide information about the dynamic of the scientific field as a whole instead of limiting the analysis to a few major actors and generalizing the result to the whole community without further ado.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/28/2021 10:21:45AM Via Free Access Nothing to Say About Race and Class? 117
    Chapter 3 Nothing to Say About Race and Class? We should be judged, not by the errors we make but by what we make of our errors. annie sugier1 Critics should not construct for our subjects a historically impossible purity. jonathan arac2 [B]eaucoup de problèmes nous paraissent plus essentiels que ceux qui nous concernent singulièrement…. The Second Sex, 1:29 Summer 2006. I am traveling to Berlin to speak at a conference, “Black Euro- pean Studies in Transnational Perspective,” stopping for a month in Oxford on the way. Dragging three overweight suitcases stuffed with books and notes about Simone de Beauvoir, I land at Heathrow and find myself in a longer im- migration queue than usual (because England is playing in the World Cup), and I fall into conversation with two very young American women, recent col- lege graduates. One, who asserts gamely that she “works in improv in New York,” is coming “to study Shakespeare at the Globe”; the other, nervous and asthmatic, is emigrating, moving to (I think) Hertfordshire to get married and live happily ever after. She is carrying her wedding dress with eight-foot train in a monster-sized garment bag over her shoulder, and oozing anxiety about her prospective in-laws, who appear to have a great deal of money. “I’m from a humble background,” she explains to me, a total stranger. She’s from New Ha- ven, but she didn’t go to Yale … This isn’t going to work, I think, but of course 1 Colloque internationale, Université Paris Diderot Paris 7, January 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scope of the Argument from Species Overlap
    bs_bs_banner Journal of Applied Philosophy,Vol.31, No. 2, 2014 doi: 10.1111/japp.12051 The Scope of the Argument from Species Overlap OSCAR HORTA ABSTRACT The argument from species overlap has been widely used in the literature on animal ethics and speciesism. However, there has been much confusion regarding what the argument proves and what it does not prove, and regarding the views it challenges.This article intends to clarify these confusions, and to show that the name most often used for this argument (‘the argument from marginal cases’) reflects and reinforces these misunderstandings.The article claims that the argument questions not only those defences of anthropocentrism that appeal to capacities believed to be typically human, but also those that appeal to special relations between humans. This means the scope of the argument is far wider than has been thought thus far. Finally, the article claims that, even if the argument cannot prove by itself that we should not disregard the interests of nonhuman animals, it provides us with strong reasons to do so, since the argument does prove that no defence of anthropocentrism appealing to non-definitional and testable criteria succeeds. 1. Introduction The argument from species overlap, which has also been called — misleadingly, I will argue — the argument from marginal cases, points out that the criteria that are com- monly used to deprive nonhuman animals of moral consideration fail to draw a line between human beings and other sentient animals, since there are also humans who fail to satisfy them.1 This argument has been widely used in the literature on animal ethics for two purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Sarah Coakley and the Future of Systematic Theology
    Being George Eliot: An Impossible Standpoint? Janice McRandal “Coakley is the George Eliot of Theologians.”1 This claim, made by Mark Oppenheimer, has sat uncomfortably in my memory for many years now, punctuated by a perpetual question mark. Oppenheimer was most likely referring to the way prose operated in Coakley’s work, but the ambiguity, or rather the irony, of this analogy has stuck. Eliot, of course, chose to conceal her gender. It was a means to an end, a way to penetrate the literary community of the Victorian era; a choice she felt would allow her work to be taken seriously and shield her from the puritanical gaze. It was a successful strategy for Mary Ann Evans: George Eliot’s legacy is secure alongside the great writers of Western literature. But this is hardly an uncomplicated ascription, perhaps demonstrated by the lasting confusion surrounding Virginia Woolf’s famous declaring of Eliot’s Middlemarch to be “one of the few English novels written for grown- up people.”2 In Coakley’s case, writing systematic theology as a woman 1. Mark Oppenheimer, “Prayerful Vulnerability,” Christian Century 120, no. 13 (2003): 26. 2. Virginia Woolf, “George Eliot,” The Times Literary Supplement, 20 November 1919. Regarding the vii COAKLEY AND THE FUTURE OF SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY has become an identity marker, a way in which her work is praised and critiqued. She has been celebrated for her “erudite, challenging and eirenic theological voice,”3 her work being described as a “connoisseur’s piece,”4 while simultaneously being critiqued for her academic Fachsprache,5 an ongoing issue of concern for feminists debating the use of exclusive language in the field.6 Much of this evaluation seems to depend on assumptions regarding what constitutes a serious systematician, or a solemn feminist.
    [Show full text]
  • Hell on Earth
    Welcome to Hell on Earth Artificial Intelligence, Babies, Bitcoin, Cartels, China, Democracy, Diversity, Dysgenics, Equality, Hackers, Human Rights, Islam, Liberalism, Prosperity, The Web Michael Starks The saddest day in US history. President Johnson, with two Kennedy’s and ex-President Hoover, gives America to Mexico - Oct 3rd 1965 Reality Press Las Vegas Copyright © 2020 by Michael Starks All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted without the express consent of the author. Printed and bound in the United States of America. ISBN 978-1-951440-81-7 “At what point is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever reach us it must spring up amongst us; it cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen we must live through all time or die by suicide.” Abraham Lincoln Heaven and Earth are inhumane--they view the myriad creatures as straw dogs TaoTe Ching This very body the Buddha, this very earth the lotus paradise Osho I can well imagine a religion in which there are no doctrines, so that nothing is spoken. Clearly, then, the essence of religion can have nothing to do with what is sayable. Wittgenstein What we are supplying are really remarks on the natural history of man, not curiosities; however, but rather observations on facts which no one has doubted and which have only gone unremarked because they are always before our eyes. Wittgenstein RFM I p142 Philosophers constantly see the method of science before their eyes and are irresistibly tempted to ask and answer questions in the way science does.
    [Show full text]
  • Atouch of 'Enlightenment'
    2006-2017 Kasturi & Sons Ltd. -Sukumar [email protected] - know saturday, march 17, 2018 BL 8 Ĩ STATES OF MATTER A touch of ‘Enlightenment’ At a time when most pundits are given to despair over the near-collapse of global order, psychologist and linguist Steven Pinker sees immense scope for human betterment masses under their benign sway. The American declaration of independence sukumar is an apt metaphor for what went wrong in the muralidharan Enlightenment project. Agreeing on its reson­ ant formulation that all men are “created equal” and endowed with “certain inalienable rights”, was the easy part. The waffling began the moment it came to making this principle operational in the citizenship law. The US “nat­ uralisation” law adopted in 1790 — a mere 14 years since the declaration of independence — restricted the right of citizenship to “free white persons” of good character. This was foretold in the doctrine pro­ nounced by Kant and its curious insistence that Enlightenment lies in the “free” submis­ sion of all to universal laws, leading to the civic state in which every man would be equal and autonomous and “compelled to be a good citizen”. Kant begins with a notion of “free” submission of all mankind to the universal laws — whatever be his moral attributes — and ends with a certain force of “compulsion” that makes him a good citizen. That force of com­ pulsion would be subtle in some instances, overt and explicit in others. Kant for instance, saw private individuals as meriting the status of citizenship only if they were free, ie, unconstrained by the need to dis­ pose of their labour power in the market to keep body and soul together.
    [Show full text]
  • Sarah Coakley
    god, sexuality, and the self God, Sexuality, and the Self is a new venture in systematic theology. Sarah Coakley invites the reader to reconceive the relation of sexual desire and the desire for God, and – through the lens of prayer practice – to chart the intrinsic connection of this relation to a theology of the Trinity. The goal is to integrate the demanding ascetical undertaking of prayer with the recovery of lost and neglected materials from the tradition, and thus to reanimate doctrinal reflection both imaginatively and spiritually. What emerges is a vision of human longing for the triune God which is both edgy and compelling: Coakley’s théologie totale questions standard shib- boleths on ‘sexuality’ and ‘gender’, and thereby suggests a way beyond current destructive impasses in the churches. The book is clearly and accessibly written, and will be of great interest to all scholars and students of theology. sarah coakley is Norris–Hulse Professor of Divinity at the University of Cambridge. Her publications include Religion and the Body (Cambridge, 2000), Powers and Submissions: Philosophy, Spirituality and Gender (2002), Pain and its Transformations (2008), The Spiritual Senses (with Paul L. Gavrilyuk; Cambridge, 2011), and Sacrifice Regained (Cambridge, 2012). Coakley is also the editor of Re-Thinking Gregory of Nyssa (2003) and co-editor (with Charles M. Stang) of Re-Thinking Dionysius the Areopagite (2009). University Printing House, Cambridge CB28BS, United Kingdom Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York Cambridge University Press is part of the University of Cambridge. It furthers the University’s mission by disseminating knowledge in the pursuit of education, learning, and research at the highest international levels of excellence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Critique of the Principle of Uniformitarianism and the Analysis
    The Critique ofthe Principle ofUniformitarianism and the Analysis of High School Earth Science Textbooks Ho Jang Song and Hui Soo An Department ojEarth Science Education, Seoul National University Although uniformitarianism is widely recognized as the basic principle upon which the structure of historical geology has been erected, a closer investigation on the basis of present scientific knowledge and the philosophy of science reveals some of its invalid aspects. The concept of uniformitarianism wasdeveloped in a dual concept in Lyellian days. Substantive uniformitarianism (a testable theory of geologic change postulating uniformity of rates or material conditions) is false, ambiguous and stifling to hypotheses formation. Methodological uniformitarianism (a procedural principle asserting that former changes of the Earth's surface may be explained by reference to causes now in operation) belongs to the defmition of science and is not unique to geology. Moreover, it also has some methodological defects in forming bold and novel working hypotheses. Methodological uniformitarianism today should take the form of a much older and more general scientific principle: Occam's Razor, the principle of simplicity. Accordingly, substantive uniformitarianism, an incorrect theory, should be abandoned. Methodological uniformi­ tarianism, now a superfluous term, should be best confined to the historical roles in geology. In this connection, the presentation of uniformitarianism in high school textbooks was analyzed. It was revealed that text books were riddled with false and misleading statements as to what uniformi­ tarianism means. Since uniformitarianism, as presented in many textbooks, is in direct contradiction to the philosophy of Inquiry learning, it is important to rethink the direction of uniformitarianism presentation in Earth Science curriculum development.
    [Show full text]