Downloaded from Brill.Com09/28/2021 10:21:45AM Via Free Access Nothing to Say About Race and Class? 117

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Downloaded from Brill.Com09/28/2021 10:21:45AM Via Free Access Nothing to Say About Race and Class? 117 Chapter 3 Nothing to Say About Race and Class? We should be judged, not by the errors we make but by what we make of our errors. annie sugier1 Critics should not construct for our subjects a historically impossible purity. jonathan arac2 [B]eaucoup de problèmes nous paraissent plus essentiels que ceux qui nous concernent singulièrement…. The Second Sex, 1:29 Summer 2006. I am traveling to Berlin to speak at a conference, “Black Euro- pean Studies in Transnational Perspective,” stopping for a month in Oxford on the way. Dragging three overweight suitcases stuffed with books and notes about Simone de Beauvoir, I land at Heathrow and find myself in a longer im- migration queue than usual (because England is playing in the World Cup), and I fall into conversation with two very young American women, recent col- lege graduates. One, who asserts gamely that she “works in improv in New York,” is coming “to study Shakespeare at the Globe”; the other, nervous and asthmatic, is emigrating, moving to (I think) Hertfordshire to get married and live happily ever after. She is carrying her wedding dress with eight-foot train in a monster-sized garment bag over her shoulder, and oozing anxiety about her prospective in-laws, who appear to have a great deal of money. “I’m from a humble background,” she explains to me, a total stranger. She’s from New Ha- ven, but she didn’t go to Yale … This isn’t going to work, I think, but of course 1 Colloque internationale, Université Paris Diderot Paris 7, January 2008. Annie Sugier was in- troduced as “physiciste et militante, ancien combattante du mlf et de la Ligue des Droits de la Femme.” She delivered a powerful testimony about Beauvoir’s direct impact on feminist activism in the 1970s and into the twenty-first century. Some of what she said has been pub- lished as Annie Sugier and Kahina Benziane, “Nos chemins se sont croisés,” in the conference proceedings. 2 Jonathan Arac, “Imperial Eclecticism in Moby Dick and Invisible Man: Literature in a Postco- lonial Empire,” 152. © Meryl Altman, 2020 | doi 10.1163/9789004431218_005 This is an open access chapter distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.Meryl Altman - 9789004431218 Downloaded from Brill.com09/28/2021 10:21:45AM via free access Nothing to Say About Race and Class? 117 I don’t say so. As an older woman, a “frequent flyer,” I make reassuring noises to both. “We’re almost there,” I say. As we finally approach the immigration desk, the budding actress asks me to look over her landing card, because she isn’t sure she filled it out right (I have admitted to being a teacher). I see that in the box for “nationality,” she has writ- ten, “Hispanic, Jewish.” So I say gently, no, that’s where you put “usa.” And the other young woman says “Oh. I just put ‘White.’” ... A funny story (sort of); when I told it in Oxford, D. started teasing me: “when are you going back to White?” But how does it happen that perfectly likeable, well-meaning, well-educated young people seem oblivious to their own na- tionality as a salient fact about themselves even when traveling? Is it that Amer- icans “generously” assume all human beings to be American till proven other- wise? Or, that within the United States questions of race and ethnic identity are so heated and vexed that they block out all information about the rest of the world? Issues of nation and race were urgent for Simone de Beauvoir and her intel- lectual and political traveling companions in the years following the Second World War, as the Cold War consolidated American hegemony, while old-style European colonialism exploded, decayed, shifted shape. Such issues are equal- ly urgent for feminists today: in France, where questions about hijab and secu- larism have divided feminists, with Beauvoir’s legacy claimed by both sides; in the United States, where the lip service given to multiculturalist ideals in main- stream civic life seems to have left kneejerk nationalism largely undisturbed; and in feminist theory, where we are still looking for a way to think about more than one kind of oppression at the same time, without subordinating one to another or excusing any, trying to find our way toward a fully anti-racist and transnational feminism that does not dissolve into paradoxes. It would, I will argue, be a mistake to assume that Beauvoir has nothing to contribute to those discussions. The task of the next four chapters is partly to answer what I view as misun- derstandings and misappropriations of Beauvoir’s views on race and class, a task already well begun by Margaret Simons, Sonia Kruks, Doris Ruhe, others. But I hope to go beyond the rather strange professional activity of “defending my author” to convey a richer understanding of what Beauvoir actually said, and why, and how that can help us. I place particular emphasis on what liter- ary scholars call “reception contexts.” It is important to situate Beauvoir with respect to the discourses of the time and place from which she wrote: many Meryl Altman - 9789004431218 Downloaded from Brill.com09/28/2021 10:21:45AM via free access <UN> 118 Chapter 3 misunderstandings have arisen from not doing so, from imposing anachronis- tic expectations and/or recruiting her to later intra-feminist debates. But also, placing Beauvoir’s readers in historical context can usefully complicate the usual map we draw of feminist history since the middle of the last century. I’ll be reading Beauvoir in dialogue with other discourses around race and class, both upstream and downstream from her arguments, including her en- gagement with the anti-colonial and anti-racist work being done by Richard Wright, Frantz Fanon, Aimé Césaire, and also with a more problematic dis- course of “appreciation” of non-European cultural forms by the French intel- lectual left and the avant-garde. International travel, both real and imaginary, played a crucial role in all those discourses, and in how her relationships to them developed. And, as one might expect, it is not always easy, perhaps not always possible, to pry the progressive and regressive discourses apart. 1 Beauvoir’s Trip to America, and What She Found There What I had been doing on that airplane was re-reading Beauvoir’s L’Amérique au jour le jour 1947 (America Day by Day 1947), a book-length essay-travelogue- diary about her first visit to the United States.3 In that book Beauvoir suggests that Americans, including American college students, really don’t know much about the wider world they live in, a situation she found strange and somewhat terrifying, given the enormous power the United States was wielding as the Cold War got under way. She was especially concerned to ask how a sense of political impotence and fatalism, including among intellectuals and on the so- called Left, could co-exist with an American optimism and idealism she re- garded as sincere. L’Amérique au jour le jour 1947 is an interesting book in its own right, but also because while she was writing it, she was working out the ideas that would emerge as The Second Sex.4 Beauvoir spent time in New York 3 Translations from this text are my own. Of the two available English versions, both titled America Day by Day (without the year), the better one is Carol Cosman’s (1999). The earlier one (1953), by Patrick Dudley, includes some good photographs, but made very significant cuts from the French, eliminating most of the Beauvoir’s political and economic critique and her discussion of current events, including many of the passages I discuss below. See William McBride, “The Postwar World According to Beauvoir,” for a comprehensive account of what is missing. Beyond a simple “dumbing down” for American audience, McBride sees “obvious malice aforethought”: “In fact, there is something quite sinister about this first English trans- lation, which in certain respects is more like a Hollywood film version of L’Amérique au jour le jour” (“The Postwar World According to Beauvoir,” 432). 4 Excerpts from L’Amérique au jour le jour 1947 appeared in four issues of Les Temps Modernes, from December 1947 through April 1948; in the very next issue, the lead article is “La femme Meryl Altman - 9789004431218 Downloaded from Brill.com09/28/2021 10:21:45AM via free access <UN> Nothing to Say About Race and Class? 119 and Chicago, where she met with leading American intellectuals and French expatriates; she also took a far-flung lecture tour of college campuses, visited California and New Mexico, and traveled through Texas and the Deep South on a Greyhound bus with her friend Nathalie Sorokine Moffat. And while she saw a lot about the United States that she liked, she was also quite critical, particu- larly of an American tendency to think in abstractions, because abstractions tend to be mystifications, or myths. Abstraction, she says, is a way of making things bearable that ought to be, and remain, unbearable.5 She also notes that the idea of “Europe,” of herself as “European,” first became salient to her in the course of that trip.6 Travel’s power to reverse the optic of identity is a familiar enough idea. She’d reach for it in the introduction to The Second Sex as a way to clarify her basic concept of the Other: while traveling, the “native” is scandalized to see that other countries have their own natives, who look at him and see a for- eigner.7 That underlying problem of intersubjectivity, which Sartre so memo- rably phrased as “the Look of the Other that steals my world from me,” had preoccupied Beauvoir from her earliest writings, and had taken center stage in her first published novel, L’invitée, with its epigraph from Hegel: “every con- sciousness desires the death of the other.” But the problem of the Other had turned out not to be as simple as it had seemed when Françoise in that novel, looking through a keyhole, saw herself as the villainess in someone else’s story rather than the heroine of her own life.
Recommended publications
  • Stakeholder Participation in Radiological Decision Making
    Radiation Protection 2004 Stakeholder Participation in Radiological Decision Making: Processes and Implications Stakeholder Participation in Radiological Decision Making: Since 1998, the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency has been organising a series of workshops to address the various aspects of stakeholder involvement in radiological protection decision making. These workshops have been instrumental in forging consensus and improving understanding of key issues Processes and Implications in this area. Building on the experience of the first two “Villigen workshops”, the third in the series exten- Third Villigen Workshop sively analysed three case studies, which covered the licensing of a new facility, the clean-up and Villigen, Switzerland release of an old facility, and the rehabilitation of a large, contaminated area. Consideration was given to the stakeholder involvement processes that had been used, and the implications that these did or 21-23 October 2003 could have on radiological protection policy, regulation and application. The workshop papers ana- lysing these processes and implications are presented in these proceedings, which should provide valuable examples and lessons for governments, regulators and practitioners. (66 2004 12 1 P) E 24.00 -:HSTCQE=VU]WZ\: ISBN 92-64-10825-4 NUCLEAR•ENERGY•AGENCY Radiation Protection STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION IN RADIOLOGICAL DECISION MAKING: PROCESSES AND IMPLICATIONS Third Villigen Workshop Villigen, Switzerland 21-23 October 2003 © OECD 2004 NEA No. 5298 NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY ORGANISATION FOR
    [Show full text]
  • Exploration of Narrative Devices in Documentary Propaganda Across Different
    Exploration of Narrative Devices in Documentary Propaganda Across Different Media Platforms Comparative Analysis of the USSR in the 1920s and Russia in the 2010s Kirill Chernyshov A Research Paper Submitted to the University of Dublin, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Interactive Digital Media 2018 Declaration I have read and I understand the plagiarism provisions in the General Regulations of the University Calendar for the current year, found at: http://tcd.ie/calendar I have also completed the Online Tutorial on avoiding plagiarism ‘Ready, Steady, Write’, located at http://tcd-ie.libguides.com/plagiarism/ready-steady-write I declare that the work described in this Research Paper is, except where other stat- ed, entirely my own work and has not been submitted as an exercise for a degree at this or any other University. Signed: Kirill Chernyshov Date: Permission to Lend and/or Copy I agree that Trinity College Library may lend or copy this research paper upon request. Signed: Kirill Chernyshov Date: Acknowledgements To my family and friends in different parts of the world for their support while being so far away. To my new friends here, flatmates, and classmates, for being there and making this experience so exciting. To Vivienne, my supervisor, for the fantastic lectures, positive spirit, and valuable guidance throughout the year. Summary In this research paper, two periods in Russian and Soviet history are compared in or- der to identify the differences in narrative devices used in the 1920s and 2010s. These two cases were chosen to analyse due to, apart from the fact that today’s Russia is a comparatively young direct successor of the USSR, that predictably causes some similarities in the people’s identity and values, there are some similarities in historical and political context of these two periods that were revealed in this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Hispanic/Latino Issues in Philosophy
    NEWSLETTER | The American Philosophical Association Hispanic/Latino Issues in Philosophy FALL 2019 VOLUME 19 | NUMBER 1 FROM THE EDITORS ARTICLES Carlos A. Sánchez and Lori Gallegos Omar Rivera de Castillo Approaching Racial Embodiment, CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS Aesthetics, and Liberation in José Carlos Maríategui’s Seven Essays SPECIAL CLUSTER Alejandro Vallega Stephanie Rivera Berruz América Tropical, On the Force of Latinx Philosophy Conference Latino/a/x Thought Allison Wolf Sergio Rodrigo Lomelí Gamboa Dying in Detention as an Example of Oppression The Marxism of José Revueltas: A Struggle Against Orthodoxy Alan Chavoya Arturo Aguirre Moreno A Negative Path Towards Anti-Racist Immigration Policy Thinking about Exile: Community, Violence, and Law Jorge M. Valadez Susana Nuccetelli Immigration and International Justice Book Excerpt: Marx on Bolívar Eric Bayruns Garcia BOOK REVIEW Are Our Racial Concepts Necessarily Essentialist Due to Our Cognitive Nature? Linda Martín Alcoff: Rape and Resistance Reviewed by Juan J. Colomina-Alminana Damían Bravo Zamora CONTRIBUTORS Epistemic Humility Now! VOLUME 19 | NUMBER 1 FALL 2019 © 2019 BY THE AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL ASSOCIATION ISSN 2155-9708 APA NEWSLETTER ON Hispanic/Latino Issues in Philosophy CARLOS A. SÁNCHEZ AND LORI GALLEGOS DE CASTILLO, CO-EDITORS VOLUME 19 | NUMBER 1 | FALL 2019 Sergio Lomeli Gamboa’s “Jose Revueltas’ Marxism: A FROM THE EDITORS Struggle Against Orthodoxy” is an excellent introduction into the thought of this brilliant Mexican thinker. Known Carlos Alberto Sánchez mostly for his fictional writing, Revueltas is also one of SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY Marx’s most original readers and a fierce critic of “Orthodox Marxism.” Gamboa’s reading here seeks not only to locate Lori Gallegos de Castillo Revueltas in the center of Mexico’s philosophical landscape TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY of the last century, but also at the center of Mexico’s cultural and political life.
    [Show full text]
  • Contesting Philosophical Authority in the Belly of El Monstruo: a Case Study in Nonideal Political Theory and Epistemic Democracy By
    Contesting Philosophical Authority in the Belly of El Monstruo: A Case Study in Nonideal Political Theory and Epistemic Democracy by David Eric Meens B.A., University of Colorado at Boulder, 2006 M.A., University of Colorado at Denver Health Sciences Center, 2007 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Philosophy 2012 This thesis entitled: Contesting Philosophical Authority in the Belly of El Monstruo: A Case Study in Nonideal Political Theory and Epistemic Democracy written by David Eric Meens has been approved for the Department of Philosophy Alison M. Jaggar Michael E. Zimmerman Date The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline ii Meens, David Eric (M.A., Philosophy) Contesting Philosophical Authority in the Belly of El Monstruo: A Case Study in Nonideal Political Theory and Epistemic Democracy Thesis directed by College Professor of Distinction Alison M. Jaggar What is philosophical inquiry about, how does one do it, and what is it good for? This paper draws upon original empirical work and is, in part, an instance of what students of the social sciences, especially those engaged in qualitative approaches to research such as ethnography, will recognize as what Fred Erickson termed a “natural history of inquiry.” During the summers of 2009 and 2010, I spent about two months conducting research in collaboration with a small, independent community located in Itztapalapa, an impoverished neighborhood of Mexico City.
    [Show full text]
  • Bienvenido León Y Michael Bourk (Eds.)
    COMMUNICATION-SOCIETY.COM VERSIÓN EN ESPAÑOL HOME Review / GENERAL INFORMATION Bienvenido León y Michael Bourk (Eds.) ADVISORY BOARD Communicating science and technology through online video: researching a new SUBMIT A MANUSCRIPT media phenomenon BACK ISSUES Published by Routledge, New York (2018), 140 pp. DATABASE INDEXES CREATIVE COMMONS At the birth of the internet and the worldwide web, it seemed that human beings had discovered a new tool that SEARCHES would deliver bounties of knowledge previously unimaginable. Here were the channels for spreading truths about the world that would topple dictators, reveal corruption, democratize learning, and liberate people from ignorance, CONTACT US superstition, and propaganda. Of course, all of those things came to pass, to some degree. Meanwhile the powerful interests that benefit from controlling rather than liberating people, from concentrating wealth in a few hands rather than sharing it, and from discrediting science rather than harnessing its discoveries have transformed INSIDE C&S the internet into a swamp of misinformation, disinformation, and propaganda as well. Such is the context for this collection of 10 essays by leading scholars of online communication, which analyzes 826 online videos on three topics: climate change, vaccinations, and nanotechnology. The essays examine this new media genre from various perspectives: producers of content, audiences, distribution channels, video formats, narrative techniques, and producer objectives, among others, to evaluate its impact and effectiveness. Online science video takes many forms, ranging from three- or four-minute video blogs created for YouTube to full-length documentaries and TV series transferred to video with narration by such luminaries as Neil deGrasse Tyson, whose Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey series ran first on Fox television and the National Geographic Channel.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMUNICATION and STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT in ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION PROJECTS the Following States Are Members of the International Atomic Energy Agency
    IAEA Nuclear Energy Series No. NW-T-3.5 Basic Communication and Principles Stakeholder Involvement Objectives in Environmental Remediation Projects Guides Technical Reports INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY VIENNA ISBN 978–92–0–145210–8 ISSN 1995–7807 13-49251_PUB1629_cover.indd 1-2 2014-05-21 09:25:53 IAEA NUCLEAR ENERGY SERIES PUBLICATIONS STRUCTURE OF THE IAEA NUCLEAR ENERGY SERIES Under the terms of Articles III.A and VIII.C of its Statute, the IAEA is authorized to foster the exchange of scientific and technical information on the peaceful uses of atomic energy. The publications in the IAEA Nuclear Energy Series provide information in the areas of nuclear power, nuclear fuel cycle, radioactive waste management and decommissioning, and on general issues that are relevant to all of the above mentioned areas. The structure of the IAEA Nuclear Energy Series comprises three levels: 1 — Basic Principles and Objectives; 2 — Guides; and 3 — Technical Reports. The Nuclear Energy Basic Principles publication describes the rationale and vision for the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. Nuclear Energy Series Objectives publications explain the expectations to be met in various areas at different stages of implementation. Nuclear Energy Series Guides provide high level guidance on how to achieve the objectives related to the various topics and areas involving the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. Nuclear Energy Series Technical Reports provide additional, more detailed information on activities related to the various areas dealt with in the IAEA Nuclear Energy Series. The IAEA Nuclear Energy Series publications are coded as follows: NG — general; NP — nuclear power; NF — nuclear fuel; NW — radioactive waste management and decommissioning.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges Faced by Technical and Scientific Support Organizations In
    P1301_covI-IV.indd 1 2007-08-17 10:21:48 IAEA SAFETY RELATED PUBLICATIONS IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS Under the terms of Article III of its Statute, the IAEA is authorized to establish or adopt standards of safety for protection of health and minimization of danger to life and property, and to provide for the application of these standards. The publications by means of which the IAEA establishes standards are issued in the IAEA Safety Standards Series. This series covers nuclear safety, radiation safety, transport safety and waste safety, and also general safety (i.e. all these areas of safety). The publication categories in the series are Safety Fundamentals, Safety Requirements and Safety Guides. Safety standards are coded according to their coverage: nuclear safety (NS), radiation safety (RS), transport safety (TS), waste safety (WS) and general safety (GS). Information on the IAEA’s safety standards programme is available at the IAEA Internet site http://www-ns.iaea.org/standards/ The site provides the texts in English of published and draft safety standards. The texts of safety standards issued in Arabic, Chinese, French, Russian and Spanish, the IAEA Safety Glossary and a status report for safety standards under development are also available. For further information, please contact the IAEA at P.O. Box 100, 1400 Vienna, Austria. All users of IAEA safety standards are invited to inform the IAEA of experience in their use (e.g. as a basis for national regulations, for safety reviews and for training courses) for the purpose of ensuring that they continue to meet users’ needs. Information may be provided via the IAEA Internet site or by post, as above, or by email to Official.Mail@iaea.org.
    [Show full text]
  • GEP Mines Paper WISMUT 2007
    THE PLURALISTIC EXPERT GROUP ON URANIUM MINE SITES IN LIMOUSIN, FRANCE Didier GAY, Yves MARIGNAC, Annie SUGIER 1 Introduction Growing public awareness of environmental risks as well as new regulations on stakeholder involvement have led authorities in France to set up structures for open dialogue, both at regional and national levels. In the nuclear domain, local information committees, created for each nuclear site, have seen their position and their role reinforced by the 2006 law on nuclear transparency. Similarly, the 2002 law on technological and industrial risks, adopted following the catastrophic explosion at the AZF chemical plant, also stipulates the creation of such committees for high-risk industries. Moreover, it has become apparent that on complex technical subjects prone to controversy, authorities should go one step further and create the conditions for a more open examination of the issues by calling on independent experts, who may be opposed to the projects in question, in addition to the government's usual institutional experts. The Comité de la Prévention et de la Précaution which mission is to advice the French minister for the environment was asked to give its opinion on the expert assessment of industrial accident risks. It produced a report which identified the conditions for conducting expertise jointly with the parties involved. According to this report, the most advanced method of joint expertise is the pluralistic approach. The document stated that pluralism involves calling on a variety of disciplines and practitioners, as well as on representatives of various viewpoints, including those of the stakeholders. This approach is well suited to risk assessment, and a benchmark example of its application in France is provided by the Groupe Radioécologie Nord Cotentin (pluralistic group organised in response to the controversy surrounding the reportedly high rate of leukaemia close to the La Hague site).
    [Show full text]
  • Value Inquiry Book Series
    Beauvoir in Time Value Inquiry Book Series Founding Editor Robert Ginsberg Executive Editor Leonidas Donskis† Managing Editor J.D. Mininger volume 348 Philosophy, Literature, and Politics Edited by J.D. Mininger (lcc International University) The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/vibs and brill.com/plp Beauvoir in Time By Meryl Altman leiden | boston This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided no alterations are made and the original author(s) and source are credited. Further information and the complete license text can be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ The terms of the CC license apply only to the original material. The use of material from other sources (indicated by a reference) such as diagrams, illustrations, photos and text samples may require further permission from the respective copyright holder. An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched. More information about the initiative can be found at www. knowledgeunlatched.org. Cover illustration: Simone de Beauvoir in Beijing 1955. Photograph under CC0 1.0 license. The Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available online at http://catalog.loc.gov LC record available at http://lccn.loc.gov/2020023509 Typeface for the Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic scripts: “Brill”. See and download: brill.com/brill-typeface. ISSN 0929-8436 isbn 978-90-04-43120-1 (hardback) isbn 978-90-04-43121-8 (e-book) Copyright 2020 by Meryl Altman.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    Annual Report 2007 Contents Organization ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Foreword by the Director General ............................................ 2 Standing advisory group meetings in 2007 ........................... 10 Interview with the Deputy Director General in charge Organization chart ................................................................. 11 of defense-related missions .................................................... 4 Board of Directors .................................................................. 12 A short description of IRSN ..................................................... 5 The Steering Committee for the Nuclear Defense Expertise IRSN Missions .......................................................................... 6 Division ................................................................................... 14 Activity 2007 key figures......................................................... 7 The Scientific Council ............................................................. 15 Key events 2007 ...................................................................... 8 Report and outlook .................................................................................................................................................. 16 Introduction ............................................................................ 18 the information, expertise, and
    [Show full text]
  • Belgium/Belgique Participants List for International Symposium on The
    Participants List for International Symposium on the Safety Case Liste des Participants pour Symposium international sur le dossier de sûreté 23/1/2007 - 25/1/2007 All Sessions Belgium/Belgique Dr. Peter DE PRETER Tel: +32 2 212 1049 ONDRAF/NIRAS Fax: +32 2 218 5165 Avenue des Arts, 14 Email: p.depreter@nirond.be B-1210 Brussels Belgium Mrs. Ann DIERCKX Tel: +32 (0)2 212 10 45 ONDRAF/NIRAS Fax: +32 (0)2 212 51 65 Avenue des Arts, 14 Email: a.dierckx@nirond.be 1210 Brussels Belgium Dr. Jan MARIVOET Tel: +32 14 33 32 42 SCK/CEN Fax: +32 14 32 35 53 Boeretang, 200 Email: jmarivoe@sckcen.be 2400 Mol Belgium M. Vincent NYS Tel: +32(2)5280271 Association Vinçotte Nuclear (AVN) Email: vns@avn.be 148, rue Walcourt B-1070 Bruxelles Belgium Mr. Olivier SMIDTS Tel: +32 2 528 02 69 Association Vinçotte Nuclear Email: osm@avn.be rue Walcourt, 148 1070 Bruxelles Belgium Mr. Eric VAN HOVE Tel: + 32 12 213523 University of Antwerp Email: erik.vanhove@ua.ac.be Nieuwe Baan 2 3730 Hoeselt Belgium Mrs. Eef WEETJENS Tel: +32-14-333239 SCK.CEN Email: eweetjen@sckcen.be Boeretang 200 2400 MOL Belgium Page 1/19 as of Tuesday, January 30, 2007 Canada/Canada Mr. Richard FERCH Tel: +1 613 224 3752 Expert to NEA Fax: +1 613 224 3752 1267 Marygrove Circle Email: ferchr@storm.ca K2C 2E1 Ottawa Canada Mr. Peter FLAVELLE Tel: +1 613 995 3816 Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission Fax: +1 613 995 5086 PO Box 1046Station B280 Slater Street Email: peter.flavelle@cnsc-ccsn.gc.ca K1P 5S9 Ottawa Canada Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oxygen of Amplification Better Practices for Reporting on Extremists, Antagonists, and Manipulators Online
    The Oxygen of Amplification Better Practices for Reporting on Extremists, Antagonists, and Manipulators Online By Whitney Phillips EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MAPPING THE MEDIA ECOSYSTEM We live in a time where new forms of power are emerging, where social and digital media are being leveraged to reconfigure the information landscape. This new domain requires journalists to take what they know about abuses of power and media manipulation in traditional information ecosystems and apply that knowledge to networked actors, such as white nationalist networks online. These actors create new journalistic stumbling blocks that transcend attempts to manipulate reporters solely to spin a beneficial narrative – which reporters are trained to decode – and instead represent a larger effort focused on spreading hateful ideology and other false and misleading narratives, with news coverage itself harnessed to fuel hate, confusion, and discord. The choices reporters and editors make about what to cover and how to cover it play a key part in regulating the amount of oxygen supplied to the falsehoods, antagonisms, and manipulations that threaten to overrun the contemporary media ecosystem—and, simultaneously, threaten to undermine democratic discourse more broadly. This context demands that journalists and the newsrooms that support them examine with greater scrutiny how these actors and movements endeavor to subvert journalism norms, practices, and objectives. More importantly, journalists, editors, and publishers must determine how the journalistic rule set must be strengthened and fortified against this newest form of journalistic manipulation—in some cases through the rigorous upholding of long-standing journalistic principles, and in others, by recognizing which practices and structural limitations make reporters particularly vulnerable to manipulation.
    [Show full text]