DOCSLIB.ORG

PLANNING COMMITTEE 28Th May, 2013 SCHEDULE of PLANNING

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PLANNING COMMITTEE 28Th May, 2013 SCHEDULE of PLANNING Everyone 7 128 2346 rep_agd_ID Draft 3 Chief Executives 0 0 rep_exe_IDsNo No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No 28/05/2013 09:30:58 Chief Executive Old 1776 1 Chief Executive Decision Contributors Contact Officer PLANNING COMMITTEE 28th May, 2013 Agenda Item 6 Public Report SCHEDULE OF PLANNING APPLICATIONS 1. PURPOSE AND RECOMMENDATIONS Purpose of Report: To consider the planning applications contained within the schedule and to receive details of any withdrawn or requested deferred applications, if any. Recommendations: It is RECOMMENDED that: the applications contained in this schedule be determined or otherwise dealt with in accordance with the Development Manager's recommendation. Lead Members: Cllr J Hazel Contact Officer: Giles Moir, Development Management Manager 2. Application Schedule No. Application No. Site Address Pg. 1. 3/12/1087/COU 321 New Road, Ferndown, Dorset 2 2. 3/13/0074/FUL Land To The East Of Ashton Farmhouse, 32 Stanbridge, Wimborne 3. 3/13/0093/FUL Lower Farm, Gussage St Michael, Wimborne 46 4. 3/13/0099/FUL 22 Highmoor Road, Corfe Mullen, Wimborne 52 5. 3/13/0154/HOU 31 Golf Links Road, Ferndown, Dorset 63 6. 3/13/0166/COU 38 Hillside Road, Corfe Mullen, Wimborne 69 7. 3/13/0190/HOU 24 Westwood Avenue, Ferndown, Dorset 77 8. 3/13/0209/FUL Lingmell, Northleigh Lane, Colehill 79 9. 3/13/0271/HOU 55 Oaks Drive, St Leonards, Ringwood 96 10. 3/13/0276/HOU 25 St Stephens Lane, Verwood, Dorset 101 11. 3/13/0299/HOU 57 Hadrian Way, Corfe Mullen, Wimborne 104 12. 3/13/0368/FUL Cinnamon Lounge, Verwood Road, Woodlands 107 1 Item Number: 1. Ref: 3/12/1087/COU Proposal: Mixed use of site as dwelling and commercial cattery to include the erection of 22 units to house cats, a reception building and 3 additional car parking spaces accessed from New Road as amended by plans rec'd 4/3/13 to clarify side of buildings and amended by plans rec'd 19/4/13. Site Address: 321 New Road, Ferndown, Dorset, for Mrs A Criddle Constraints Bournemouth International Airport Historic Contaminated Land Heathland 5km or 400m Consultation Area NATS Technical Sites Special Character Area Urban Areas LP Site Notice exp: 16 February 2013 Advert expired: Nbr-Nfn expired: 12 February 2013 Ferndown Town Council Object Comments: This is out of keeping with the area - inappropriate commercial development in a mainly residential area. There will be additional noise emanating from the proposed development with additional visitors/traffic. It is noted that there are gates at the rear of the property and the Committee wonders whether this has received planning permission in the past? Further comments received 10.5.13: The Town Council Planning Committee re-considered the matter at their meeting on 2.5.2013. They were of the opinion that their previous comments on the application remain valid and they would continue to object to the granting of Planning Permission. In particular, they believe that the revised Design and Access Statement is inadequate, there will be increased noise emanating from the cats, the proposed development is inappropriate in a mainly residential area and there will be increased traffic problems with visitors arriving at the property, with the area immediately adjacent to and surrounding it having parking restrictions. Members thought that there are inadequate parking facilities on the site to cater for the number of visitors and occupants of the property. It was noted that there would possibly be effluent problems from the proposed cattery given that water flows down the garden from that area and congregates at the bottom of the garden where it can become stagnant water. Consultee Responses: County Highways The County Highway Authority has NO OBJECTION, Development Liaison Officer subject to the following condition: - 2 The development hereby permitted shall not be occupied or utilised until the access, turning and parking shown on the approved plans has been constructed. Thereafter, these areas shall be maintained, kept free from obstruction and available for the purposes specified. Reason: In the interests of road safety. Further email received 22.3.13 The property has an existing vehicular access off New Road whis has adequate visibility. This section of New Road is subject to parking restrictions and has a 40mph speed limit. This access leads to an extended parking and turning area and a double garage. This frontage parking area alone is suitable for 4 vehicles (not including those in the garage) and has a turning space. There is also opportunity to provide additional parking for the dwelling, if it were needed, at the rear onto Chander Close which is public highway. There are already double gates serving a semi- hardened parking space. Whilst there is no dropped kerb it is understood that a s184 licence under the Highways Act 1980 has been obtained; and would be unlikely to be refused in any event due to the access being at the end of a cul-de- sac on an unclassified road. The expected trip generation for a cattery of this scale with the movements of the existing dwelling is expected to be low; and there is also the opportunity to combine domestic trips with a cat collection and delivery service that is understood will also be offered to clients. The County Highway Authority therefore has NO OBJECTION, subject to the following condition: - The development hereby permitted shall not be occupied or utilised until the access, turning and parking shown on the approved plans has been constructed. Thereafter, these areas shall be maintained, kept free from obstruction and available for the purposes specified. Reason: In the interests of road safety. EDDC Tree Section No objections: subject to standard arboricultural conditions. The property stands in the New Road Special Character Area, and has a number of mature and maturing trees which stand on and adjacent to the 3 property which are currently protected by tree preservation orders. Significant trees in the front and rear gardens are likely to be affected by this proposed development. Although no meaningful construction details have been submitted with this application, I am confident that the development proposals could be achieved using a range of currently available professional construction techniques. This should allow the trees to be retained relatively free from long term harm. Therefore if you are minded to approve this application, please can you place the following arboricultural condition and informative note on this application: 1) Notwithstanding details already submitted with the application, no development or demolition shall start on site until an Arboricultural Impact Assessment and Method Statement (AMS) in accordance with BS5837:2012 Trees in Relation to Design, Demolition and Construction Recommendations, has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The development shall then be carried out in accordance with the approved AMS. This condition shall not be discharged until an arboricultural supervision statement, the contents of which are to be agreed at a pre-commencement meeting, is submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority on completion of development. Reason. To comply with the arboricultural and landscape requirements of Policy DES8 and to ensure that trees and landscape amenity are not harmed or lost during any stage of this development. EDDC Public Health - I cannot see that the business will cause a noise, Housing And Pollution odour or light nuisance and therefore have no objection assuming the applicant will apply for the standards required under animal boarding establishments. Neighbour Comments: Mr Ian Cardall 329 New As many have already written, this proposal fulfils Road, Ferndown virtually all the criteria for why a planning application should be refused. The Design and Access statement is totally inadequate, barely over a side of typing, and 4 gives no details of the disposal of wastage and of the frequency and timing of cleaning or of the presence of noxious smells. It states clearly that New Road is a special character area, a prime reason why such a development should not be allowed here. It states quite correctly that there are some commercial businesses in the immediate area, but these all involve learned professions and do not involve ugly, intrusive and crudely designed outhouses. Thus this development will have an adverse effect on the immediate neighbours by causing noise and disturbance. There will be an unacceptably high overdevelopment of the site caused by the obliteration of a substantial section of the garden actually bringing the development nearer to the neighbours of the property than to the house on the actual site, a problem where there is already issues of drainage from the property. This over-bearing intrusion will ruin a glorious view which stretches for quite a distance down the road. The development will also add to the traffic on an already busy road. This development will have a serious, adverse effect on the character of the road. All the immediate neighbours and some beyond the immediate area have objected to this development and they have a right to be heard and for their interests to be protected under the Human Rights Act. S & J D Darby 30 Chander Object Close, Ferndown We wish to register our strong objections to the proposal for a cattery. It would appear that one business, a catering company, is already run from these premises. A cattery business would involve extra traffic, noise and smell from the cats, and deliveries would undoubtedly be made via the back gate in Chander Close, directly outside our house.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 235883 Plot120riversedge DO
    2 WELCOME TO Rivers Edge At Rivers Edge you will discover a collection of new luxury homes, meticulously crafted and finished to an impeccable standard. The quality inside is matched only by the stunning location, one that inspires discovery, exploration and reflection each and every day. 2 3 W IMB O R N E MIN S TER NESTLED IN THE HEART OF THE Dorset Countryside Wimborne Minster is defined by its charm, beauty and heritage. The development’s idyllic backdrop provides a number of opportunities for exploration and discovery. The Cranborne Chase Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty is also on your doorstep, with over 380 square miles of rich landscapes, vast river valleys and imposing hillsides. The area is also an oasis of historic villages and charming towns, with an array of grand landmarks found in between. One of note is Kingston Lacy, a magnificent Venetian manor that is home to an incredible collection of Egyptian artefacts, a marvellous art collection and a beautiful Japanese garden. It’s also surrounded by 8,500 acres of designed and maintained landscape for you to immerse yourself in. 5 WIMBORNE MINSTER QUINTESSENTIAL MARKET TOWN LIVING At its finest Whether you prefer a slower pace of living, enjoy the finer things in life or are seeking The renowned Kingston Lacy is just a stone’s throw away as well, with its imposing 17th- adventure, Wimborne Minster provides an abundance of opportunities, escapes century Venetian-style manor housing collections of historic artefacts and art collections, and explorations. along with its beautiful surrounding gardens and 8,500 acres of untouched countryside.
    [Show full text]
  • 135. Dorset Heaths Area Profile: Supporting Documents
    National Character 135. Dorset Heaths Area profile: Supporting documents www.naturalengland.org.uk 1 National Character 135. Dorset Heaths Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment White Paper,1 Biodiversity 20202 and the European Landscape Convention,3 we are revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas North (NCAs). These are areas that share similar landscape characteristics, and which East follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision-making framework for the natural environment. Yorkshire & The North Humber NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform West their decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a East landscape scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage Midlands broader partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will West also help to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. Midlands East of Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features England that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each London area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental South East Opportunity (SEOs) are suggested, which draw on this integrated information. South West The SEOs offer guidance on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future.
    [Show full text]
  • East Dorset Locality Profile Narrative 2020 Template
    Logo here East Dorset Locality profile narrative 2020 template Public Health Dorset January 2020 Table of contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 2 2. Locality basics – geography and demography ................................................................... 33 3. Wider determinants of wellbeing ..................................................................................... 44 4. Global burden of disease ............................................................................................ 1010 1 Logo here 1. Introduction Background 1.1 During the summer of 2019 a review of Locality Profile narratives was carried out with key stakeholders across the health and care system in Dorset and Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole (BCP). A summary of findings from the engagement can be found here. 1.2 Informed by stakeholder feedback, this edition of the Locality profile narratives Provides commentary on a wider range of indicators (from Local Health), presenting these by life course to increase the emphasis on wider determinants of health and wellbeing Uses global burden of disease (GBD)1 as a means of exploring in more detail specific areas of Local Health and general practice based data. 1.3 As with the previous versions of the narratives, these updates are based on data from two key sources: Local Health and General practice based data from https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/profile/general-practice. 1.4 In keeping with previous
    [Show full text]
  • WMTC Response to Dorset Council's Draft Local Plan
    WMTC Response to Dorset Council’s Draft Local Plan 1. Introductory Comments Wimborne Minster Town Council (WMTC) is unable to support the draft Dorset Council Local Plan in its current form. These introductory comments give an overview of the reasons why and the following sections provide more detail and background to support those reasons. If required, detailed base data that links to specific wording, para/page numbers in the Plan or evidence documents can be provided for Dorset Council’s reference. The draft Plan contains numerous erroneous, contradictory, and out of date material. Whilst undoubtedly a great deal of work has gone into such a large project, so long as significant errors contained within the documents still exist, the recommendations/ proposals within it are clearly unreliable and cannot be justified. An appendix of factual inaccuracies is attached to this report. Particularly concerning and hugely significant examples are: - the stated population for Wimborne and Colehill varies from 8,700 to 13,300 in supporting documentation, both are under assessed; and - that Wimborne Minster has an Upper School (QE School is not actually within the parish of Wimborne Minster but in the adjoining Parish of Pamphill which is in walking distance from the Town). This throws doubt on the validity of all the proposals. It is with great concern that claims can be made which are clearly untrue/ unachievable such as the suggestion that if WMC 6 goes ahead it will take 15 minutes by public transport from Wimborne to Dorchester! There are omissions and inconsistencies within the Plan including the absence of a Council-wide spatial and transport strategy, Strategic Housing Needs Assessment, Retail Study and Town Centre Needs Assessment amongst other key documentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk Register 2012
    HERITAGE AT RISK 2012 / SOUTH WEST Contents HERITAGE AT RISK 3 Reducing the risks 7 Publications and guidance 10 THE REGISTER 12 Content and assessment criteria 12 Key to the entries 15 Heritage at risk entries by local planning authority 17 Bath and North East Somerset (UA) 19 Bournemouth (UA) 22 Bristol, City of (UA) 22 Cornwall (UA) 25 Devon 62 Dorset 131 Gloucestershire 173 Isles of Scilly (UA) 188 North Somerset (UA) 192 Plymouth, City of (UA) 193 Poole (UA) 197 Somerset 197 South Gloucestershire (UA) 213 Swindon (UA) 215 Torbay (UA) 218 Wiltshire (UA) 219 Despite the challenges of recession, the number of sites on the Heritage at Risk Register continues to fall. Excluding listed places of worship, for which the survey is still incomplete,1,150 assets have been removed for positive reasons since the Register was launched in 2008.The sites that remain at risk tend to be the more intractable ones where solutions are taking longer to implement. While the overall number of buildings at risk has fallen, the average conservation deficit for each property has increased from £260k (1999) to £370k (2012).We are also seeing a steady increase in the proportion of buildings that are capable of beneficial re-use – those that have become redundant not because of any fundamental lack of potential, but simply as the temporary victims of the current economic climate. The South West headlines for 2012 reveal a mixed picture. We will continue to fund Monument Management It is good news that 8 buildings at risk have been removed Schemes which, with match-funding from local authorities, from the Register; less good that another 15 have had to offer a cost-effective, locally led approach to tackling be added.
    [Show full text]
  • Colehill East & Stapehill RM.Pub
    Electoral Division Profile 2017 East Dorset Colehill East & Stapehill Electoral Division Total Population: 9,200 (2015 Mid Year Estimate, DCC) Number of Electors: 7,761 (March 2017, EDDC) Colehill East & Stapehill Electoral Division is composed of the following parishes: Colehill and Ferndown Town. Within the division there is 1 library (community library). There are also 4 schools (all primary). Population Colehill East & Stapehill Dorset 2015 Mid-Year Population Estimates, ONS & DCC East Dorset Electoral (DCC) Division All 9,200 88,700 420,600 % aged 0-15 years 17.3 15.2 16.0 % aged 16-64 years 56.6 54.1 56.1 % aged 65-84 years 22.7 25.9 23.8 % aged 85+ years 3.4 4.8 4.1 Colehill East & Stapehill division has a total population of 9,200. The age profile within the division is very slightly younger than the County profile. The proportion of people aged 0-15 years is 17.3% and 26.2% are aged 65+ years. For Dorset as a whole, these figures are 16.0% and 27.9% respectively. There is a slightly lower proportion aged 85+, 3.4% compared to 4.1% across Dorset. Created by Policy & Research, Chief Executive’s Department Email: [email protected] Colehill East & Stapehill Electoral Division, PAGE 1 Ethnicity/Country of Birth / Language spoken Colehill East & Stapehill Dorset Census, 2011 East Dorset Electoral (DCC) Division % White British 96.5 96.2 95.5 % Black and minority ethnic groups (BME) 3.5 3.8 4.5 % England 92.6 91.8 91.0 % born rest of UK 3.0 3.3 3.4 % Rep of IRE 0.3 0.4 0.4 % EU (member countries in 2001) 1.1 1.2 1.3 % EU
    [Show full text]
  • Colehill & Stapehill 13.Pub
    Electoral Division Profile 2013 East Dorset Colehill & Stapehill Electoral Division Total Population: 9,270 (2011 Mid Year Estimate, DCC) Number of Electors: 7,694 (Dec 2012, EDDC) Colehill & Stapehill Electoral Division is composed of the following wards: Colehill East, Colehill West and Stapehill. Within the division there is 1 community library and 8 schools (4 primary, 2 middle, 1 special and 1 secondary Population Colehill & Stapehill East Dorset 2011 Mid-Year Population Estimates, ONS & DCC Electoral Dorset (DCC) Division All 9,270 87,170 412,910 % aged 0-15 years 15.8% 15.6% 16.3% % aged 16-64 years 58.7% 56.5% 58.5% % aged 65-84 years 22.5% 23.5% 21.3% % aged 85+ years 3.1% 4.4% 3.9% Colehill and Stapehill division has a total population of almost 9,300. The population has a slightly older age profile than the County average, 25.6% are aged 65+ years compared with 25.2% across Dorset. However there are fewer people in very old age, Colehill & Stapehill Electoral Division, 3.1% compared with 4% across Dorset. PAGE 1 Ethnicity/Country of Birth Colehill & Stapehill East Dorset Census, 2011 Electoral Dorset (DCC) Division % white British 96.8 96.2 95.5 % Black and minority ethnic groups (BME) 3.2 3.8 4.5 % England 92.4 91.8 91.0 % born rest of UK 3.3 3.3 3.4 % Rep of IRE 0.3 0.4 0.4 % EU (member countries in 2001) 1.1 1.2 1.3 % EU (Accession countries April 2001 to March 2011) 0.3 0.4 0.7 % born elsewhere 2.7 2.9 3.1 3.2% of the population in Colehill & Stapehill Electoral Division are from black and minority ethnic groups, lower than the County average (4.5%).
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Councillor 12 March 2021 You
    Dear Councillor 12 March 2021 You are summoned to join a virtual Extraordinary meeting of the TOWN COUNCIL via video link on FRIDAY 19 MARCH 2021 at 10.30 am. Yours sincerely Town Clerk PUBLIC QUESTION TIME Members of the public are invited to submit questions to the Council in writing by 9.30 am on the day before this meeting (i.e. Thursday, 18 March 2021) is due to be held using the following email address: [email protected] or by delivering a hard copy of the question to the Town Hall, West Borough. A G E N D A 1 APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE 2 DRAFT DORSET LOCAL PLAN To consider the suggested draft response compiled by the Task & Finish Group (copy herewith). 3 WIMBORNE FOOD BANK – REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL STORAGE To consider a request to site a container in the grounds of the Leigh Park Community Centre as contained in an email from the organiser (copy herewith). 4 EXCLUSION OF PRESS AND PUBLIC The meeting will be adjourned at this point and Members of the press and public will be excluded for the remainder of the meeting. 5 RISK MANAGEMENT REVIEW 2020/21 To consider the risk management review prepared for the current financial year as required by the External Auditor (copy to follow). Extraordinary Town Council – 19 March 2021 LOCALISM ACT 2011 and CODE of CONDUCT Members are reminded to comply with those elements of the Localism Act and the Town Council's Code of Conduct in respect of disclosable pecuniary interests. GENERAL CONDUCT Members are reminded that the Council has a general duty to consider the following matters in the exercise of any of its functions: Equal Opportunities (race, gender, sexual orientation, marital status and any disability), Crime & Disorder, Health & Safety, Human Rights and Data Protection (General Data Protection Regulation).
    [Show full text]
  • Wimborne Minster Town Council and Colehill Parish Council – a Statement of Common Ground
    Christchurch Borough and East Dorset District Councils Core Strategy/Local Plan Examination in Public. Wimborne Minster Town Council and Colehill Parish Council – A Statement of Common Ground. The Wimborne Minster Town and Colehill Parish Councils have agreed the following Statement of Common Ground concerning the East Dorset and Christchurch Core Strategy, in particular Chapter 8 titled “Wimborne/Colehill Housing and Town Centre”, and other relevant documents submitted for consideration at the Examination in Public. Both Councils welcome planned development over the next 15 years, and especially the increased emphasis on the provision of social housing which has been lacking in recent years. However, both Councils consider the scale of residential development proposed for Wimborne/Colehill within the 15 year planning period (2447 new dwellings including both urban and non urban) is not only grossly disproportionate within the District as a whole (46%) but is also grossly excessive for the two Settlements (a 39% increase in households, 46% increase in the combined populations, plus an additional 3650 or more private vehicles). Neither Council believes that the sustainability of the proposed developments has been proven: key studies to this effect (transport and traffic, site-specific flood risk assessments, groundwater source analyses) are yet to be carried out. Nor do the two Councils believe that the infrastructure requirements have been thought through sufficiently, particularly the provision of school places, medical facilities, and sewerage capacity. We remain most concerned about the impact of increased traffic on an already congested road system. The extant (2010) Wimborne Transport Model Study reveals no less than a 45% increase in “general traffic around the town”, considerably greater increases in the volume of traffic on certain key roads (Leigh, Cranborne, Middlehill, and others), and the majority of the 21 key road junctions studied becoming “near, at, or over capacity” or “of concern” (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • COLEHILL PARISH PLAN Colehill Parish Plan Group - 2008 2
    COLEHILL PARISH PLAN Colehill Parish Plan Group - 2008 2 This map is reproduced from the Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office (c) Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. 100024319. 2007 A FEW FACTS AND FIGURES CONTENTS: National Census 2001 Parish Map 2 Dwellings Introduction 3 Dwellings, total 2870 History 4 Owner occupied 2526 Community and Activities 5 Second Homes 3 Housing 8 Environment 10 Housing Association 187 Health 11 Average Household Size 2.46 Crime and Safety 12 Average Number. of Rooms per Household 5.96 Traffic and Transport 13 One Person Household, pensioner 402 Young People 16 One Person Household, other 226 Children’s Page 17 Lone Parent Households 83 Action Plans: Community 18 People Housing 19 All People 7000 Environment 20 All Males 3441 Health 21 All Females 3559 Crime and Safety 22 Children 0 - 15 1260 Traffic and Transport 23 Young People < 25 599 Young People 24 People 25 - 64 3741 Useful Telephone Numbers 25 Acknowledgements 26 People 65 - 74 768 People > 75 632 People with a long-term limiting Illness 1019 South East Dorset People in good health 5162 South East Dorset comprises Employment (16 to 74) Bournemouth, Poole and All People 5108 Christchurch Boroughs, and East Dorset District, with parts All Males, employed 1772 of North Dorset and Purbeck All Males, unemployed** 61 Districts. All Females, employed 1510 All Females, unemployed** 39 Average hours worked - Male 42.1 Average hours worked - Female 28.7 Average miles to work 9.4 No qualifications above Level 1 2264 **Registered unemployed Front Cover - A view in Cannon Hill Woods.
    [Show full text]
  • Admissions Policy – St Michael's CE Middle School, Colehill
    Admissions Policy – St Michael’s CE Middle School, Colehill 1. Introduction a. Wimborne Academy Trust is the admission authority and responsible for the admission arrangements of the School. This document sets out the admission arrangements of the School for the academic year 2020/2021. b. The published admission number (PAN) for entry into the School is 150. The School will admit up to the PAN in the normal year of entry which is Year 5. Where there are more applications for admission than places available at the School, then places will be offered in accordance with the oversubscription criteria at section 3 of this policy. c. Where a child has an education, health and care plan (EHCP) which names the School, then that child will be admitted to the School and the number of available places in the PAN will reduce correspondingly. d. When applying to start school in Year 5 in in September 2020 you must apply to your home Local Authority (“LA”). All applications for admission must be received by your home LA by the closing date of 15 January 2020. The home LA will make a single offer of a place on 16th April 2020 (or next working day). 2. Religious Character of the School a. The School is designated with a religious character. The School’s religious authority is the Diocese of Salisbury. The School must have regard to its religious authority when setting the terms of its admission arrangements. b. Recognising its historic foundation, the School will preserve and develop its religious character in accordance with the principles of the Church of England and in partnership with the churches at parish and diocesan level.
    [Show full text]
  • Colehill Parish Council Response to Dorset
    COLEHILL PARISH COUNCIL RESPONSE TO DORSET COUNCIL LOCAL PLAN ISSUED FOR CONSULTATION JANUARY 2021 Colehill Parish Council object to the Local Plan for the seven reasons detailed below: 1. The scale of the housing allocation for Colehill is excessive • The Local Plan includes new housing allocations for 11,195 houses across Dorset in the next 17 years (sect 2.7). • The population of Colehill Parish is 7,190, based on the 2016 parish level population estimates on Dorset Insights, which is 1.9% of the Dorset County population 378,510. • Based on 1.9% of the total housing allocation, a ‘fair’ housing allocation is 213 houses. • The actual number proposed is 495, more than double the ‘fair’ figure. • Colehill is also likely to see c. 186 houses constructed on Small & Minor sites (sect 2.7.17), based on 1.9% of 9,808. In total this means 681 houses, a 22% increase on our current housing stock of 3,087. • In addition two sites with existing consents at Cranborne & Leigh Road have 786 houses still to be developed. These sites are on land that was in Colehill Parish until being transferred to Wimborne in 2015 when these developments commenced. Including these sites gives a total of 1,467 houses, a 47.5% increase on the housing in the area, and more than six times the ‘fair’ figure. • Such a large increase is grossly excessive for a parish the size of Colehill to absorb, particularly as we have limited infrastructure and a crowded road network. 2. The housing allocation is focused too heavily on East Dorset • The map on page 2 (figure 1) shows the approximate position of each of the new housing allocations proposed, in total 11,195 houses: ‒ Each circle has been sized to reflect the number of houses proposed at that site.
    [Show full text]