Survey on Blood-Sucking Lice (Phthiraptera: Anoplura) of Ruminants and Pigs with Molecular Detection of Anaplasma and Rickettsia Spp

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Survey on Blood-Sucking Lice (Phthiraptera: Anoplura) of Ruminants and Pigs with Molecular Detection of Anaplasma and Rickettsia Spp Veterinary Parasitology 174 (2010) 355–358 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Veterinary Parasitology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/vetpar Short communication Survey on blood-sucking lice (Phthiraptera: Anoplura) of ruminants and pigs with molecular detection of Anaplasma and Rickettsia spp S. Hornok a,∗, R. Hofmann-Lehmann b, I.G. Fernández de Mera c, M.L. Meli b, V. Elek d, I. Hajtós d, A. Répási d, E. Gönczi b, B. Tánczos a, R. Farkas a, H. Lutz b, J. de la Fuente c,e a Department of Parasitology and Zoology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Szent István University, István u. 2., 1078 Budapest, Hungary b Clinical Laboratory, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland c Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos IREC (CSIC, UCLM, JCCM), Ronda de Toledo, 13005 Ciudad Real, Spain d County Veterinary Station, Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén, Vologda u. 1., 3525 Miskolc, Hungary e Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Center for Veterinary Health Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA article info abstract Article history: Lice may serve as biological or mechanical vectors for various infectious agents. To inves- Received 18 June 2010 tigate louse infestation of ruminants and pigs, and pathogens potentially transmitted by Received in revised form 25 August 2010 them, anopluran lice (n = 1182) were collected in Hungary, and evaluated for the presence Accepted 1 September 2010 of anaplasma, rickettsia and haemotropic mycoplasma DNA. On cattle the following species were found: Linognathus vituli (57%), Haematopinus eurysternus (38%) and Solenopotes capil- Keywords: latus (5%). L. vituli had a lower mean individual count/host when compared to H. eurysternus. Anoplura On calves only L. vituli was observed, with a higher louse burden than on full-grown cattle. H. Linognathus Haematopinus eurysternus and S. capillatus were more likely to occur simultaneously with another species Anaplasma on the same host, than L. vituli. Goats infested with Linognathus stenopsis had the over- Rickettsia all highest prevalence (68%), while pigs harbouring Haematopinus suis showed the lowest Vector (<1%). Anaplasma DNA was detected in 50% of pools analysed. In L. vituli Anaplasma ovis (or a closely related novel Anaplasma marginale genotype) was identified. Anaplasma-positivity of H. suis suggests that pigs may extend the reservoir and/or host spectrum of relevant species. Anaplasma-infected L. stenopsis pools show for the first time that caprine anaplas- mosis is endemic in Hungary. Rickettsia spp. were demonstrated from Linognathus spp. and H. eurysternus. No haemotropic mycoplasmas were detected in any samples. In conclusion, this is the first molecularly confirmed report of bovine and ovine Anaplasma spp. in L. vituli, L. stenopsis and H. suis. The present results suggest that phthirapterosis of domestic animals deserves more attention, and lice should be evaluated among the broad range of potential vectors of arthropod-borne pathogens. © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction ological changes in their hosts, i.e. weight loss, hide damage and mild to severe anaemia – the latter especially in cat- The blood-sucking lice (Phthiraptera: Anoplura) are tle (Nelson et al., 1970; Gibney et al., 1985; Otter et al., permanent, host-specific ectoparasites of mammals. Their 2003). Secondly, as vectors, they can transmit louse-borne veterinary significance may be twofold. First, they can be pathogens (viruses, bacteria, fungi and protozoa) to sus- responsible for economical losses by inducing pathophysi- ceptible hosts. In this respect, their biological vector role usually means persistent development of disease agents in their gut cells, with or without consequent passing in their ∗ faeces. In either case, they do not inoculate the pathogen Corresponding author. Tel.: +36 1 478 4187; fax: +36 1 478 4193. E-mail address: [email protected] (S. Hornok). during a next blood-sucking, but it is rubbed into the host’s 0304-4017/$ – see front matter © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.09.003 356 S. Hornok et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 174 (2010) 355–358 skin inadvertently (Durden and Lloyd, 2009). Alternatively, 2.3. Molecular investigations if lice are short-term mechanical vectors, it becomes possi- ble that within hours of their former feeding they inoculate The DNA contents of each sample were preliminar- disease agents attached to their mouthparts (Shope, 1940; ily assessed by an 18S rRNA gene TaqMan real-time PCR Crystal, 1958). A prerequisite for both types of transmis- (Applied Biosystems, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) as described sion is that lice transfer between hosts, which is an integral previously (Boretti et al., 2009). In order to eval- aspect of their behaviour (Durden and Lloyd, 2009). uate the presence of bacterial agents (Rickettsiales: Reports on pediculosis of domestic animals are scarce, Anaplastamaceae and Rickettsiaceae; Mycoplasmatales: and prevalence data from several parts of Europe are lack- Mycoplasmataceae) conventional PCR was performed for ing or outdated. Correspondingly, in veterinary medicine the detection of Anaplasma spp. (screening for the 16S rRNA the epidemiological significance and vector potential of gene, positives evaluated for the msp4 gene) and real-time anopluran lice also appears to be underestimated or insuf- PCR assays were run for the demonstration and quantifi- ficiently evaluated. In part, this may be due to the regular cation of Rickettsia (23S and gltA genes) and haemotropic and widespread use of broad spectrum endectocides that Mycoplasma spp. (16S gene) as published (Brown et al., are given to kill parasites other than lice. However, it must 2001; de la Fuente et al., 2005; Boretti et al., 2009; Willi be kept in mind that in areas with lower standards of live- et al., 2009). Negative control reactions were included stock management lice and their vector role should not be using the same procedures and water instead of DNA to neglected or discounted: on the contrary, they may rep- monitor contamination of the PCR. Amplified fragments resent emerging problems (Otter et al., 2003; Bisdorff et of anaplasma DNA were resin purified (Wizard, Promega) al., 2006). Therefore this study was undertaken to eluci- and cloned into the pGEM-T vector (Promega) for sequenc- date the occurrence of sucking lice of ruminants and pigs ing both strands by double-stranded dye-termination cycle in Hungary, and to contribute to the general knowledge on sequencing (Secugen SL, Madrid, Spain). At least two inde- the potential vector role of relevant species. pendent clones were sequenced for each PCR. 2.4. Statistical analysis 2. Materials and methods Sample prevalence data were analysed by using Fisher’s 2.1. Sample collection exact test. Louse burdens were compared with Student’s t-test. Differences were regarded significant when P < 0.05. Adults and nymphs of blood-sucking lice have been removed from domestic animals kept indoors during the 3. Results and discussion winter time. Sampling was performed from cattle on four farms, from goats on three farms, and from pigs in one Altogether 1182 sucking lice were collected (Table 1). farm, during March of 2009 in central and north-eastern All species occurring on relevant hosts in the temperate Hungary. A total of 173 cattle, 50 goats and 350 pigs zone were found (Durden and Lloyd, 2009). However, this were included in the study. All animals were immobilized is the first report of Solenopotes capillatus from Hungary and their whole body surface scrutinized for the pres- (Piotrowski, 1970). Comparing the anopluran species of ence of lice. During sampling the predilection sites for cattle, S. capillatus was the rarest (Table 1), with highly macroscopically distinguishable lice on cattle (Haematopi- overdispersed intensities of infestation (three cows with nus and Linognathus sp.) and goats (Linognathus sp.) were only one specimen, and one with 37). Linognathus vit- noted. The age of cattle was also recorded. Specimens uli individuals were significantly more abundant than collected from the same animal were stored in one vial. Haematopinus eurysternus and S. capillatus (P < 0.001). Cat- Species identification was completed under stereomicro- tle infested with L. vituli also predominated (P < 0.001). The scope according to Zlotorzycka et al. (1974) and Kim et al. order of importance for the three bovine blood-sucking (1986). Lice belonging to one species and removed from the louse species – based on abundance data and prevalence same host individual were stored together in 70% ethanol (extensity of infestation, Table 1) – is opposed to what was until evaluation. reported for Germany, where S. capillatus was the most fre- quently encountered species, followed by H. eurysternus, 2.2. Pooling and DNA extraction and L. vituli as the rarest (Matthes et al., 1991). L. vituli was represented by a significantly lower mean A maximum of ten lice per animal belonging to the same individual count per host (Table 1), than H. eurysternus species were pooled together. All individuals in the pool (P = 0.027), unlike in another study from Canada (Colwell were washed sequentially in detergent-containing water, et al., 2001). Regarding co-infestations of cattle, H. eurys- in tapwater and in distilled water. Air-dried lice were sub- ternus and S. capillatus were significantly more prone to be sequently minced with pointed scissors at the bottom of in concurrence with another species (37.5 and 50%, respec- Eppendorf-tubes, in 100 ␮l of phosphate-buffered saline tively) than L. vituli (6.4%; P = 0.019). On calves only L. vituli (PBS). DNA was extracted using the QIAamp DNA blood was found. No significant difference was observed between mini kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) following the manu- the mean age of L. vituli, H. eurysternus and S. capillatus- facturer’s instructions and including an overnight digestion infested animals (data not shown). However, the mean ◦ step (incubation at 56 C for at least 8 h) with tissue lysis louse count of L. vituli was significantly higher (P = 0.001) buffer and Proteinase-K (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany).
Recommended publications
  • Arthropod Parasites in Domestic Animals
    ARTHROPOD PARASITES IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS Abbreviations KINGDOM PHYLUM CLASS ORDER CODE Metazoa Arthropoda Insecta Siphonaptera INS:Sip Mallophaga INS:Mal Anoplura INS:Ano Diptera INS:Dip Arachnida Ixodida ARA:Ixo Mesostigmata ARA:Mes Prostigmata ARA:Pro Astigmata ARA:Ast Crustacea Pentastomata CRU:Pen References Ashford, R.W. & Crewe, W. 2003. The parasites of Homo sapiens: an annotated checklist of the protozoa, helminths and arthropods for which we are home. Taylor & Francis. Taylor, M.A., Coop, R.L. & Wall, R.L. 2007. Veterinary Parasitology. 3rd edition, Blackwell Pub. HOST-PARASITE CHECKLIST Class: MAMMALIA [mammals] Subclass: EUTHERIA [placental mammals] Order: PRIMATES [prosimians and simians] Suborder: SIMIAE [monkeys, apes, man] Family: HOMINIDAE [man] Homo sapiens Linnaeus, 1758 [man] ARA:Ast Sarcoptes bovis, ectoparasite (‘milker’s itch’)(mange mite) ARA:Ast Sarcoptes equi, ectoparasite (‘cavalryman’s itch’)(mange mite) ARA:Ast Sarcoptes scabiei, skin (mange mite) ARA:Ixo Ixodes cornuatus, ectoparasite (scrub tick) ARA:Ixo Ixodes holocyclus, ectoparasite (scrub tick, paralysis tick) ARA:Ixo Ornithodoros gurneyi, ectoparasite (kangaroo tick) ARA:Pro Cheyletiella blakei, ectoparasite (mite) ARA:Pro Cheyletiella parasitivorax, ectoparasite (rabbit fur mite) ARA:Pro Demodex brevis, sebacceous glands (mange mite) ARA:Pro Demodex folliculorum, hair follicles (mange mite) ARA:Pro Trombicula sarcina, ectoparasite (black soil itch mite) INS:Ano Pediculus capitis, ectoparasite (head louse) INS:Ano Pediculus humanus, ectoparasite (body
    [Show full text]
  • Nigerian Veterinary Journal 39(3)
    Nigerian Veterinary Journal 39(3). 2018 Olaosebikan et al. NIGERIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL ISSN 0331-3026 Nig. Vet. J., September 2018 Vol 39 (3): 217 - 226. https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/nvj.v39i3.5 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Haematological Changes Associated with Porcine Haemoparasitic Infections in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria Olaosebikan, O. O.; Alaka, O. O. and Ajadi, A. A.* Department of Veterinary Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Ibadan. *Corresponding author: Email: [email protected]; Tel No:+2349061959556 SUMMARY The study was carried out between January and July 2016. Blood samples were obtained from 153 pigs by venipuncture and jugular severance at slaughter. The blood samples were examined for all known hemoparasites detectable by light microscopic examination. Haematimetric indices, complete blood cell count and leukocyte differentials were determined. The level of parasitaemia and changes in blood indices were subjected to statistical analysis across seasons. Trypanosoma brucei and Eperythrozoon suis were the only hemoparasites detected in the blood of pigs during the period of sampling. The prevalence of haemoparasitic infections in sampled pigs was 5.23%. T. brucei contributed 3.9% while E. suis contributed 1.31% to the prevalence. Anaemia (PCV<32) was a consistent and significant finding in all parasitemic samples. Eperythrozoon suis caused more severe anaemia (20±9.89) when compared with Trypanosoma brucei (27±3.03). The anaemia caused by E. suis was mostly microcytic normochromic while T. brucei mostly caused normocytic normochromic anaemia. Mild leucopenia was observed in eperythrozoonosis while a moderate lymphocytosis was observed in T. brucei infections. It was observed that in spite of intense chemoprophylaxis and other control measures employed, we still have persistent infections with Eperythrozoon sp and Trypanosomes in our pig population.
    [Show full text]
  • Folk Taxonomy, Nomenclature, Medicinal and Other Uses, Folklore, and Nature Conservation Viktor Ulicsni1* , Ingvar Svanberg2 and Zsolt Molnár3
    Ulicsni et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2016) 12:47 DOI 10.1186/s13002-016-0118-7 RESEARCH Open Access Folk knowledge of invertebrates in Central Europe - folk taxonomy, nomenclature, medicinal and other uses, folklore, and nature conservation Viktor Ulicsni1* , Ingvar Svanberg2 and Zsolt Molnár3 Abstract Background: There is scarce information about European folk knowledge of wild invertebrate fauna. We have documented such folk knowledge in three regions, in Romania, Slovakia and Croatia. We provide a list of folk taxa, and discuss folk biological classification and nomenclature, salient features, uses, related proverbs and sayings, and conservation. Methods: We collected data among Hungarian-speaking people practising small-scale, traditional agriculture. We studied “all” invertebrate species (species groups) potentially occurring in the vicinity of the settlements. We used photos, held semi-structured interviews, and conducted picture sorting. Results: We documented 208 invertebrate folk taxa. Many species were known which have, to our knowledge, no economic significance. 36 % of the species were known to at least half of the informants. Knowledge reliability was high, although informants were sometimes prone to exaggeration. 93 % of folk taxa had their own individual names, and 90 % of the taxa were embedded in the folk taxonomy. Twenty four species were of direct use to humans (4 medicinal, 5 consumed, 11 as bait, 2 as playthings). Completely new was the discovery that the honey stomachs of black-coloured carpenter bees (Xylocopa violacea, X. valga)were consumed. 30 taxa were associated with a proverb or used for weather forecasting, or predicting harvests. Conscious ideas about conserving invertebrates only occurred with a few taxa, but informants would generally refrain from harming firebugs (Pyrrhocoris apterus), field crickets (Gryllus campestris) and most butterflies.
    [Show full text]
  • Swine Ectoparasites: Hog Louse, Haematopinus Suis Description And
    Author Swine Ectoparasites: Hog Louse, Haematopinus suis Wes Watson, North Carolina State University Reviewer Morgan Morrow, North Carolina State University Description and Biology The hog louse is one of the largest members of the suborder Anoplura, a group of bloodsucking insects infesting swine (Figure 3). Restricted to the skin surface, hog lice take several bloodmeals each day. The louse is equipped with large claws to grasp the hair allow- ing these insects to move about the host. Each active life stage resembles the adult except that they are smaller in size. Gravid females glue their eggs to the base of the hair shaft (Figure 3). The eggs hatch into nymphs after incubating about 10 to 14 days. In cool weather hatching may be extended up to 20 days. Nymphs have the same feeding habits as adult lice. After undergoing 3 molts over a 10 to 14 days period, the nymph develops into an adult. Although growth and development is tempera- ture dependent under optimal conditions the entire life cycle from egg to adult can be completed in about 3 weeks. Hog lice tend to feed in clusters during their development. Infestations generally start around the ears before expanding to lower body regions. Predilection sites include the ears, neck, skin folds, and the inside surface of the legs. Hog lice spend their entire life cycle on the animal. Dislodged lice can survive for several days in warm bedding, but the primary method of transmission is direct contact with infested hogs. Hog lice are relatively rare in the US but in a recent examination of German swine farms, ap- proximately 14% had hog louse infestations (Damriyasa et al.
    [Show full text]
  • 1589511117 491 5.Pdf
    Veterinary Microbiology 231 (2019) 33–39 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Veterinary Microbiology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/vetmic High frequency and molecular characterization of porcine hemotrophic mycoplasmas in Brazil T Igor Renan Honorato Gattoa, Karina Sonálioa, Renan Bressianini do Amarala, Nelson Morésb, ⁎ Osmar Antonio Dalla Costab, Marcos Rogério Andréa, Luís Guilherme de Oliveiraa, a São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane s/n, Jaboticabal, SP 14884-900, Brazil b Embrapa Swine and Poultry, Animal Health Laboratory, BR 153, Km 110, P.O. Box 21, Distrito de Tamanduá, Concórdia, CEP 89.700-000, Santa Catarina, Brazil ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Mycoplasma suis and Mycoplasma parvum are the two hemotrophic mycoplasmas species described in pigs. M. suis Hemotrophic mycoplasmas is involved in infectious anemia, while M parvum infection is commonly subclinical. The objectives of this study Sows were twofold: (i) to investigate the prevalence of porcine hemotrophic mycoplasmas in sows from the southern Mycoplasma suis region of Brazil by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) and (ii) to genetically characterize a subset of the samples Mycoplasma parvum based on the 16S rRNA gene. A total of 429 blood samples were evaluated from 53 different farm sites. Porcine Infectious diseases hemoplasmas was detected at all the 53 tested sites and in 79.72% of the samples (342/429). Two sequences were obtained for Mycoplasma spp. The phylogenetic analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene (900 bp) showed that the Mycoplasma sequences were closely related to the M. suis cluster and that one sequence was positioned in the M.
    [Show full text]
  • (2015). Cattle Ectoparasites in Great Britain. Cattle Practice, 23(2), 280-287
    Foster, A. , Mitchell, S., & Wall, R. (2015). Cattle ectoparasites in Great Britain. Cattle Practice, 23(2), 280-287. https://www.bcva.org.uk/cattle-practice/documents/3770 Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared via BAVC. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ CATTLE PRACTICE VOLUME 23 PART 2 Cattle ectoparasites in Great Britain Foster, A.1, Mitchell, S.2, Wall, R.3, 1School of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, BS40 5DU 2Carmarthen Veterinary Investigation Centre, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Job’s Well Rd, Johnstown, Carmarthen, SA31 3EZ 3Veterinary Parasitology and Ecology Group, University of Bristol, Bristol Life Sciences Building, Bristol, BS8 1TQ ABSTRACT Ectoparasites are almost ubiquitous on British cattle, reflecting the success of these parasites at retaining a residual population in the national herd. Lice infestation is common and may be associated with significant disease especially in young moribund calves. The chewing louse Bovicola bovis is a particular challenge to eradicate given its limited response to various therapies and emerging evidence of reduced susceptibility to pyrethroids. Chorioptes is the most common cause of mange in cattle and given its surface feeding habits can be difficult to eradicate with current treatments.
    [Show full text]
  • Chewing and Sucking Lice As Parasites of Iviammals and Birds
    c.^,y ^r-^ 1 Ag84te DA Chewing and Sucking United States Lice as Parasites of Department of Agriculture IVIammals and Birds Agricultural Research Service Technical Bulletin Number 1849 July 1997 0 jc: United States Department of Agriculture Chewing and Sucking Agricultural Research Service Lice as Parasites of Technical Bulletin Number IVIammals and Birds 1849 July 1997 Manning A. Price and O.H. Graham U3DA, National Agrioultur«! Libmry NAL BIdg 10301 Baltimore Blvd Beltsvjlle, MD 20705-2351 Price (deceased) was professor of entomoiogy, Department of Ento- moiogy, Texas A&iVI University, College Station. Graham (retired) was research leader, USDA-ARS Screwworm Research Laboratory, Tuxtia Gutiérrez, Chiapas, Mexico. ABSTRACT Price, Manning A., and O.H. Graham. 1996. Chewing This publication reports research involving pesticides. It and Sucking Lice as Parasites of Mammals and Birds. does not recommend their use or imply that the uses U.S. Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin No. discussed here have been registered. All uses of pesti- 1849, 309 pp. cides must be registered by appropriate state or Federal agencies or both before they can be recommended. In all stages of their development, about 2,500 species of chewing lice are parasites of mammals or birds. While supplies last, single copies of this publication More than 500 species of blood-sucking lice attack may be obtained at no cost from Dr. O.H. Graham, only mammals. This publication emphasizes the most USDA-ARS, P.O. Box 969, Mission, TX 78572. Copies frequently seen genera and species of these lice, of this publication may be purchased from the National including geographic distribution, life history, habitats, Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, ecology, host-parasite relationships, and economic Springfield, VA 22161.
    [Show full text]
  • Louse Infestation in Production Animals
    LOUSE INFESTATION IN PRODUCTION ANIMALS Dr. J.H. Vorster, BVSc, MMedVet(Path) Vetdiagnostix Veterinary Pathology Services, PO Box 13624 Cascades, 3202 Tel no: 033 342 5104 Cell no: 082 820 5030 E-mail: [email protected] Dr. P.H. Mapham, BVSc (Hon) Veterinary House Hospital, 339 Prince Alfred Road, Pietermaritzburg, 3201 Tel no: 033 342 4698 Cell No: 082 771 3227 E-mail: [email protected]. INTRODUCTION Lice infestations, or pediculosis, is common throughout the world affecting humans, fish, reptiles, birds and most mammalian species. Many of these parasites are host very host specific, and in these hosts they may also show preference to parasitize certain areas on the body. Lice are very broadly divided into two groups namely sucking lice (suborder Anoplura) and biting lice (suborder Mallophaga). Lice may in many cases be found in animals concurrently parasitized by other ectoparasites such as ticks and mites. In some instances lice may be potential vectors for viral or parasitic diseases. The prevalence and distribution patterns of lice, as with all other ectoparasites, may be influenced by a number of different factors such as changing climate, changes in husbandry systems, animal movement and changes or failures in ectoparasite control and biosecurity measures in place. Lice infestation is of particular importance in the poultry industry, salmon farming industry and in humans. This article will focus mainly on production animals in which lice infestation may be of lesser clinical significance. SPECIES OF MITES There are a number of species of lice which are of clinical importance in domestic animals. In cattle the sucking lice are Linognathus vituli (long nose sucking louse), Solenopotes capillatus (small blue sucking louse), Haematopinus eurysternus (short-nosed sucking louse), Haematopinus quadripertusus (tail louse) and Haematopinus tuberculatus (buffalo louse); and the chewing louse is Bovicola bovis.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflection Paper on Resistance in Ectoparasites
    1 13 September 2018 2 EMA/CVMP/EWP/310225/2014 3 Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use (CVMP) 4 Reflection paper on resistance in ectoparasites 5 Draft Draft agreed by Efficacy Working Party (EWP-V) May 2018 Adopted by CVMP for release for consultation September 2018 Start of public consultation 21 September 2018 End of consultation (deadline for comments) 31 August 2019 6 Comments should be provided using this template. The completed comments form should be sent to [email protected] 7 Keywords Ectoparasites, resistance to ectoparasiticides 30 Churchill Place ● Canary Wharf ● London E14 5EU ● United Kingdom Telephone +44 (0)20 3660 6000 Facsimile +44 (0)20 3660 5555 Send a question via our website www.ema.europa.eu/contact An agency of the European Union © European Medicines Agency, 2018. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. 8 Reflection paper on resistance in ectoparasites 9 Table of contents 10 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 4 11 2. Definition of resistance ...................................................................................................... 4 12 3. Current state of ectoparasite resistance ............................................................................ 4 13 3.1. Ticks .............................................................................................................................. 4 14 3.2. Mites .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Occurrence of Haematopinus Suis Linnaeus, 1758 (Insecta, Anopluridae) on a Wild Boar (Sus Scrofa)
    Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2009; 33(6): 529-530 © TÜBİTAK Case Report doi:10.3906/vet-0806-18 Occurrence of Haematopinus suis Linnaeus, 1758 (Insecta, Anopluridae) on a wild boar (Sus scrofa) Oya GİRİŞGİN1,*, A. Onur GİRİŞGİN2, Figen SÖNMEZ2, Ç. Volkan AKYOL2 1Karacabey Vocational School, Uludağ University, 16700 Karacabey, Bursa - TURKEY 2Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Uludağ University, 16059 Görükle, Bursa - TURKEY Received: 23.06.2008 Abstract: A wild boar (Sus scrofa) about 2 years old was brought to our parasitology laboratory from Orhaneli region, Bursa province. It was examined for ectoparasites and 32 lice collected from the animal’s head were inspected and identified as Haematopinus suis. Five of them were found to be as nymphs, whereas 27 were adults. This paper is the first report of H. suis found in Bursa province, Turkey. Key words: Haematopinus suis, Turkey, Bursa, wild boar Bir yaban domuzunda (Sus scrofa) Haematopinus suis Linnaeus, 1758 (Insecta, Anopluridae) olgusu Özet: Bursa – Orhaneli bölgesinden parazitoloji laboratuarımıza getirilen iki yaşındaki bir yaban domuzunda yapılan ektoparaziter inceleme sonucu hayvanın kafasından 32 adet bit toplanmış ve Haematopinus suis olarak teşhis edilmişlerdir. Bu bitlerin beş tanesinin nimf, 27 tanesinin olgun formda oldukları belirlenmiştir. Bu çalışma sonucunda Bursa ilinde ilk defa H. suis bulunmuştur. Anahtar sözcükler: Haematopinus suis,Türkiye, Bursa, yaban domuzu Introduction brown. Infestations of this insect on its host’s skin are Haematopinus suis, known as the hog louse, infests around the ears and on the flanks and back, and in the H. suis both domesticated and wild boars in all parts of the folds of the neck and jowl.
    [Show full text]
  • Swinepox Virus
    SWINEPOX VIRUS Prepared for the Swine Health Information Center By the Center for Food Security and Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University August 2015 SUMMARY Etiology • Swinepox virus (SwPV) is an enveloped DNA virus in the family Poxviridae; it is the only member of the genus Suipoxvirus and there is little genetic variability among strains. Cleaning and Disinfection • SwPV can persist in the environment, even in dry conditions. • SwPV is susceptible to most common forms of disinfectants including acid treatment, alcohols, aldehydes, alkalis, biguanides, halogens, oxidizing agents, phenolic compounds, and quaternary ammonium compounds. Epidemiology • Swine are the only natural hosts for SwPV. Humans are not affected; however, SwPV in pigs cannot be easily distinguished from vaccinia virus (VV), which is zoonotic. • SwPV is found worldwide. • Morbidity can be very high in pigs up to four months of age. Mortality is generally low (<5%), although congenital infections are frequently fatal. Transmission • SwPV is mechanically transmitted by the hog louse, Hematopinus suis, and possibly by biting flies (Stomoxys calcitrans) and black flies (Simuliidae). Pig-to-pig transmission can also occur. Infection in Swine/Pathogenesis • Classic pox disease is characterized by formation of macules, followed by progression to papules, vesicles, pustules, and crusts. Secondary bacterial infections can also occur. • Disease primarily occurs in pigs up to four months of age, while infection in adults is typically self-limiting. Diagnosis • SwPV may be cultivated in a range of host cells in vitro. Immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry are used to detect SwPV antigens in infected epithelium. • A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay has been developed for rapid detection and differentiation from the clinically similar and zoonotic vaccinia virus (VV).
    [Show full text]
  • First Molecular Detection of Mycoplasma Suis
    Acta Tropica 194 (2019) 165–168 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Acta Tropica journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/actatropica First molecular detection of Mycoplasma suis in the pig louse Haematopinus suis (Phthiraptera: Anoplura) from Argentina T ⁎ Diana Belén Acostaa,b, Melanie Ruiza,b, Juliana Patricia Sancheza,b, a Centro de Bioinvestigaciones -CeBio, Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia del Noroeste de la Provincia de Buenos Aires- CIT NOBA (CONICET-UNNOBA), Ruta Provincial 32 Km 3.5, 2700, Pergamino, Argentina b Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Porcine haemoplasmosis caused by Mycoplasma suis affects the global pig industry with significant economic Mycoplasma suis losses. The main transmission route of M. suis is through the blood and some haematophagous arthropods, like Haematopinus suis flies and mosquitoes, could be the vectors to this pathogen. However, the presence of M. suis in pig haemato- Sus scrofa phagous ectoparasites in natural conditions has not yet been studied. The most frequent ectoparasite in pigs is 16S rRNA gene the blood-sucking louse Haematopinus suis, an obligate and permanent parasite. Therefore, this work aims to Porcine haemoplasmosis study the occurrence of M. suis in H. suis samples from both domestic and wild pig populations from Argentina; Swine production using the 16S rRNA gene. A total of 98 sucking lice, collected from domestic and wild pigs from Buenos Aires Province in central Argentina, were examined. We found M. suis DNA in 15 H. suis samples (15.30%). Positive lice were detected from all studied populations. This is the first report of M.
    [Show full text]