Transport 13
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Subsoil Dispersibility
Map design and production by the Land and Spatial Information Group, Landcentre, Department of Natural Resources and Mines. © The State of Queensland (Department of Natural Resources and Mines) {2017} Disclaimer: While every care is taken to ensure the accuracy of this product, the Department of Natural Resources and Mines makes no representations or warranties about its accuracy, reliability, completeness or suitability any particular purpose and disclaims all responsibility Workspace - \\LSIFILE1\Project\CMS\Client_Mapping\CMS_jobs\CM193 and all liability (including without limitation, liability in negligence) for all expenses, losses, damages (including indirect or consequential damage) and costs which you might incur as a result of the product being inaccurate or incomplete in any way and for any reason. 147° E 148° E 149° E 150° E 151° E Sarina Bruce Highway FFitzroyitzroy NNRMRM RRegionegion SSubsoilubsoil DDispersibilityispersibility Nebo PProducedroduced bbyy SSoiloil aandnd LLandand RResources,esources, Marlborough Sarina Road DDSITISITI 22° S 22° S Moranbah Isaac River Peak Downs Highway Connors River Dysart Bruce Highway Middlemount Clermont Marlborough 23° S 23° S Capella Fitzroy River Gregory Highway Yeppoon Mackenzie River Rockhampton Emerald Blackwater Capricorn Highway Nogoa River Mount Morgan Bruce Highway Lake Maraboon Comet River Gladstone Tannum Sands 24° S 24° S Springsure Woorabinda Lake Burnett Highway Awoonga Lake Callide Biloela Rolleston Lake Dawson Highway Kroombit Dawson Highway Moura Carnarvon Highway Theodore -
Peak Downs Highway – Walkerston to Moranbah
Road reconstruction – Mackay/Whitsunday Region Peak Downs Highway – Walkerston to Moranbah Package overview Traffic conditions The Department of Transport and Main Roads is The department will make every reconstructing over 40 kilometres of the Peak Downs effort during construction to minimise Highway between Walkerston and Moranbah as part of delays to motorists and appreciates your Operation Queenslander. patience while these essential works are completed. Reconstruction works will be progressively undertaken at The safety of motorists and roadworkers is the number multiple sections of the highway from April 2012, weather one priority when delivering these works. Traffic lights, permitting. traffic controllers, single lane closures and speed Operation Queenslander is the largest reconstruction restrictions will be used at worksites. effort in Queensland’s history as part of the joint federal Motorists should drive to the changed conditions and and state-government funded Natural Disaster Relief obey all signage for their own safety and the safety of and Recovery Arrangements (NDRRA). Under these road workers. arrangements, the Australian Government provides 75% of To assist you to plan your travels please check the funding, with 25% from the Queensland Government. www.131940.qld.gov.au before travelling. Key information Works involved Reconstruction works to sealed pavements including Farleigh repairs, pavement replacement, Marian stabilisation, widening and bitumen Mackay resurfacing. Walkerston Eton Possible delays Up to 15 minutes -
Traffic and Transport Byerwen Coal Project Chapter 27 – Traffic and Transport
Chapter 27 Traffic and Transport Byerwen Coal Project Chapter 27 – Traffic and Transport TABLE OF CONTENTS 27. Traffic and Transport..................................................................... 27-1 27.1 Introduction.....................................................................................................27-1 27.2 Scope of the Assessment ..................................................................................27-1 27.3 Consultation ....................................................................................................27-2 27.4 Existing Road Infrastructure..............................................................................27-3 27.4.1 Road Network Proposed for Use.............................................................................. 27-3 27.4.2 Scheduled Road Improvement Projects................................................................... 27-7 27.5 Current Road Use .............................................................................................27-7 27.5.1 Forecast Traffic Volumes.......................................................................................... 27-9 27.5.2 Existing Road Crash Data.......................................................................................... 27-9 27.5.3 Road Rest Areas ..................................................................................................... 27-11 27.5.4 Public Transport ..................................................................................................... 27-11 27.6 -
Attachment 1 Concept Intersection Designs
ATTACHMENT 1 CONCEPT INTERSECTION DESIGNS Ruakaka Service Centre Traffic Impact Assessment Issue E – Draft Ref: 17101 SH 1 Prescott Road Project Title Designed P Kelly Drawn A Zhong Project No - (Sheet No) Scales 1:1000 (A3) Ruakaka Service Centre 17101 - G - (7) TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD Checked P Kelly Approved T Langwell Date 27.08.19 Sheet Title Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 This drawing is the property of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. It is an instrument of service, and as such is a confidential document. It Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Overall Plan therefore cannot be traced, scanned, copied, reproduced, used or exhibited by any third party without the express permission in writing of Rev Revisions By Date Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd SH 1 Prescott Road Project Title Designed P Kelly Drawn A Zhong Project No - (Sheet No) Scales 1:1000 (A3) Ruakaka Service Centre 17101 - G - (8) TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD Checked P Kelly Approved T Langwell Date 27.08.19 Sheet Title Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 This drawing is the property of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. It is an instrument of service, and as such is a confidential document. It Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Overall Plan therefore cannot be traced, scanned, copied, reproduced, used or exhibited by any third party without the express permission in writing of Rev Revisions By Date Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd 42.2m 275m 5.3m Guide To RoadTable Design -
Public Involvement/Education on Alternative Intersection/Interchange Designs
GEORGIA DOT RESEARCH PROJECT 17-26 FINAL REPORT PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT/EDUCATION ON ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION/INTERCHANGE DESIGNS OFFICE OF PERFORMANCE-BASED MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH 600 WEST PEACHTREE NW ATLANTA, GA 30308 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA-GA-20-1726 N/A N/A 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Public Involvement/Education on Alternative Intersection/Interchange September 2020 Designs 6. Performing Organization Code N/A 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Michael O. Rodgers, Ph.D. (https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6608-9333); N/A Franklin Gbologah, Ph.D. (https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0235-4278); Kameria E. Abdella; Torrey Bodiford 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Georgia Tech Research Corporation N/A School of Civil and Environmental Engineering 11. Contract or Grant No. 790 Atlantic Dr. NW, Atlanta, GA 30332 RP17-26 Phone: (404) 385-0569 Email: [email protected] 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Georgia Department of Transportation Final Report (March 2018 – September 2020) Office of Performance-based Management and Research 600 West Peachtree St. NW 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Atlanta, GA 30308 N/A 15. Supplementary Notes Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. 16. Abstract Given the recent introduction of many innovative designs, still relatively limited material exists that explains the concepts, tradeoffs, and benefits underlying such innovative intersection designs in a form accessible to the general public. This project was designed to both test the effectiveness of existing GDOT public information materials and to develop a library of additional presentation materials to support and supplement these existing communications materials. -
Transport Infrastructure
14 Transport Infrastructure Transport Infrastructure SECTION 14 14 Transport Infrastructure Summary Road The Queensland Coke and Power Plant Project (the Project) will primarily generate private vehicle traffic relating to operation and construction, with low volumes of heavy vehicle traffic during the operational stages of the facility. All vehicle access to the project site will be via Power Station Road. Project traffic generation has been conservatively estimated based on the expected construction and operation of the plant. Light vehicle traffic has been assumed to be proportional to anticipated staff numbers at the plant and has been distributed and assigned to the network in accordance to the probable residence of plant employees during construction and operation. Construction is scheduled to proceed from 6:00 am to 6:00 pm six days a week, and therefore, the transport of construction workers to and from the site by bus is unlikely to coincide with the operation of school bus services. The Gladstone Road/Port Curtis Road/Lower Dawson Road intersection will exceed the desirable Degree of Saturation (DOS) under background growth. The Project will not add traffic to the critical movement at the intersection. The addition of project-related traffic to the roundabout located at the intersection of the Bruce Highway and Capricorn Highway will cause an increase in the DOS of the intersection. Additional project traffic will bring forward the year at which the intersection would exceed the desirable DOS. In terms of pavement impact, the Project will increase the annual Equivalent Standard Axle (ESA) loading on a number of links between Power Station Road and the Bruce Highway. -
Traffic and Transport
GREAT WESTERN HIGHWAY UPGRADE, MOUNT VICTORIA TO LITHGOW ALLIANCE FORTY BENDS UPGRADE – REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS TECHNICAL PAPER 8 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT OCTOBER 2012 Great Western Highway Upgrade, Mount Victoria to Lithgow Alliance Forty Bends Upgrade REF Technical Paper 8: Traffic and Transport Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Proposal description 1 1.2. Proposal objectives 3 1.3. Scope of this report 4 1.4. Methodology 4 1.5. Proposal study area 4 1.6. Report structure 6 2. Existing condition assessment 7 2.1. Road network 7 2.2. Traffic volumes and vehicle composition 9 2.3. Road network performance 10 2.4. Intersection layouts 12 2.5. Intersection performance 15 2.6. Local resident access 18 2.7. Land uses 18 2.8. Pedestrian and cycle access 21 2.9. Public transport services 21 2.10. Vehicle rest areas 22 2.11. Emergency services access 22 2.12. Historical crash data 23 2.13. Road safety 25 3. Future condition assessment 27 3.1. Without upgrade 27 3.2. With upgrade 28 3.3. Intersection performance 36 3.4. Access management principles 40 3.5. Potential impacts to access 41 3.6. Future development in the local area 41 3.7. Future strategic transport considerations 42 4. General road safety assessment 43 4.1. Managed access 43 4.2. Intersection upgrades 43 4.3. Improved road geometry and sight distance 43 4.4. Black ice 44 5. Construction traffic and staging 45 5.1. Working hours and duration of work 45 5.2. Construction workforce 45 5.3. -
Priority Intersection This Fact Sheet Provides Guidance and Information Regarding Priority Intersections (Those Controlled by a Give Way Or Stop Sign)
FACT SHEET FACT 7 Intersection Form – Priority Intersection This fact sheet provides guidance and information regarding priority intersections (those controlled by a give way or stop sign). Pros Cons • Low cost • Can be poor for cyclist and pedestrian safety • Low space requirements • On busy roads, pedestrian delays for crossing the road • No delays for major road through traffic may be excessive • When volumes on main road are high, can result in excessive delays and poorer safety outcomes for side road traffic Best Practice Considerations: • Crossing distances for pedestrians should be minimised • If cycle lanes are provided between blocks, these should be marked across the intersections • Where cycle lanes are provided on the major leg, the minor leg should be controlled by a give way or stop • Sight distances can dictate whether the intersection is uncontrolled, a give way or a stop • Some traffic turning movements can be banned to improve safety Basic A basic priority intersection treatment is where no right turning facilities are provided on the main road. In these layouts, turning traffic on the main road briefly blocks through traffic. These intersections are low cost due to the limited space required but can create safety issues if the traffic flows are heavy. Appropriate Locations • Intersections where the traffic volumes on the side road(s) are low • Low volume of right turning vehicles on the main road Limitations • Right turning vehicles on the main road impede through traffic • Vehicles turning out of the side street must find gaps in both directions of traffic. No turning bay Local examples: Roberts Street / Titiraupenga Street Flush Median A flush median is a painted area between traffic lanes which motorists can take refuge in while waiting to turn in/out of side roads or local accessways and where pedestrians can wait to cross the road. -
PROGRESS REPORT - 23 JULY, 2020 Funding of Priorities Identified and Advocated Through the Inland Queensland Roads Action Project (IQ-RAP)
PROGRESS REPORT - 23 JULY, 2020 Funding of Priorities Identified and Advocated through the Inland Queensland Roads Action Project (IQ-RAP) Page 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE INLAND QUEENSLAND ROADS ACTION PROJECT (IQ-RAP) The IQ-RAP was developed through consultation and engagement with local governments and industry peak bodies. Regional Roads Forums were convened in December 2013 in Longreach and in August 2014 in Mount Isa with participants coming from across inland Queensland. Regional Development Australia Townsville and North West Queensland (RDA) was requested and agreed to be the Secretariat and raised funds from partners in 2015. Funding support was forthcoming from 33 local governments that covered 82% of Queensland’s area, RACQ and 5 Regional Development Australia Committees. A Project Steering Committee was formed and consultants the Harrison Infrastructure Group (HIG) were engaged. In February, 2016 the Inland Queensland Roads Action Plan was launched. This was followed by extensive advocacy to the Australian and Queensland Governments and peak industry bodies through to mid-2018. In mid-2017 IQ-RAP partners agreed to extend the project and update the Plan into a new Inland Queensland Road Network Strategy, taking into account the funding commitments that had been made to priorities identified in 2016, carrying over the priorities that still required funding and updating the Multi- Criteria Analysis with new information. 28 local governments, 5 Regional Development Australia Committees and RACQ provided on-going funding support. Further extensive advocacy was undertaken. This document summarises the funding that has been secured for priorities identified and advocated through the Inland Queensland Roads Action Project (IQ-RAP) and the two major reports that were prepared by Harrison Infrastructure Group (HIG) and Regional Development Australia Townsville and North West Queensland (RDA). -
Evaluation of Innovative Alternative Intersection Designs in the Development of Safety Performance Functions and Crash Modification Factors
Final Report Contract BDV24-977-27 Evaluation of Innovative Alternative Intersection Designs in the Development of Safety Performance Functions and Crash Modification Factors Mohamed A. Abdel-Aty, Ph.D., P.E. Jaeyoung Lee, Ph.D. Jinghui Yuan, Ph.D. Lishengsa Yue, Ph.D. Ma’en Al-Omari, Ph.D. Student Ahmed Abdelrahman, Ph.D. Student University of Central Florida Department of Civil, Environmental & Construction Engineering Orlando, FL 32816-2450 May 2020 DISCLAIMER “The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the State of Florida Department of Transportation.” ii UNITS CONVERSION APPROXIMATE CONVERSIONS TO SI UNITS SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL LENGTH in inches 25.4 millimeters mm ft feet 0.305 meters m yd yards 0.914 meters m mi miles 1.61 kilometers km SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL AREA in2 square inches 645.2 square millimeters mm2 ft2 square feet 0.093 square meters m2 yd2 square yard 0.836 square meters m2 ac acres 0.405 hectares ha mi2 square miles 2.59 square kilometers km2 WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL SYMBOL VOLUME fl oz fluid ounces 29.57 milliliters mL gal gallons 3.785 liters L ft3 cubic feet 0.028 cubic meters m3 yd3 cubic yards 0.765 cubic meters m3 NOTE: volumes greater than 1000 L shall be shown in m3 SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL MASS oz ounces 28.35 grams g lb pounds 0.454 kilograms kg iii T short tons (2000 lb) 0.907 megagrams (or Mg (or "t") "metric ton") SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW -
WINCHESTER SOUTH PROJECT Environmental Impact Statement
Appendix I Road Transport Assessment WINCHESTER SOUTH PROJECT Environmental Impact Statement Winchester South Project Road Transport Assessment Prepared for: Whitehaven WS Pty Ltd 16 April 2021 The Transport Planning Partnership E: [email protected] Winchester South Project Road Transport Assessment Client: Whitehaven WS Pty Ltd Version: Final Date: 16 April 2021 TTPP Reference: 19227 Quality Record Version Date Prepared by Approved by Signature Final 16/04/2021 Penny Dalton Penny Dalton Table of Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 2 Winchester South Project ........................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Project Location ............................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Project Description ........................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Road Transport Assessment Scenarios ........................................................................... 6 2.4 Project Transport Task ....................................................................................................... 7 2.4.1 Workforce Travel ....................................................................................................... 7 2.4.2 Deliveries and Visitors .............................................................................................. -
Mona Vale Road West Upgrade Mccarrs Creek Road, Terrey Hills to Powder Works Road, Ingleside Review of Environmental Factors & Appendices A–C, Volume 1 February 2017
Mona Vale Road West Upgrade McCarrs Creek Road, Terrey Hills to Powder Works Road, Ingleside Review of Environmental Factors & Appendices A–C, Volume 1 February 2017 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK rms.nsw.gov.au 13 22 13 Customer feedback Roads and Maritime February 2017 Locked Bag 928, RMS 17.026 North Sydney NSW 2059 ISBN: 978-1-925582-48-2 Document tracking Revision Details Date Reviewed by 1 First Draft 18 Jan 2016 C. McCallig 2 Final Draft REF 21 Apr 2016 A. Louis 3 Revised Final Draft 30 Nov 2016 C Masters 4 REF for Exhibition 30 Jan 2017 C Masters Executive summary Mona Vale Road is the main east-west link between the Pacific Highway, Pymble and Pittwater Road at Mona Vale totalling about 20 kilometres in length. Traffic surveys carried out in December 2013 near the intersection of Mona Vale Road and Tumburra Street indicated the volume of traffic to be about 37,000 vehicles per day, counting both directions. Roads and Maritime Services proposes to upgrade and widen about 3.4 kilometres of Mona Vale Road between McCarrs Creek Road, Terrey Hills and Powder Works Road, Ingleside, from a two lane (one in each direction) undivided road to a four lane (two lanes in each direction) divided road. The proposal generally comprises: Widening to provide four lanes (two in each direction) on Mona Vale Road between McCarrs Creek Road and Powder Works Road by: Widening on the southern side of the existing carriageway between McCarrs Creek Road and Kimbriki Road Deviation of the entire four lane road from the current road to the north of a rock outcrop having cultural heritage significance between Kimbriki Road and Tumburra Street Widening on the northern side of the existing carriageway from about 700 metres west of Tumburra Street to Addison Road Widening on both sides of the existing carriageway between Addison Road and Powder Works Road.