ATTACHMENT 1

CONCEPT INTERSECTION DESIGNS

Ruakaka Service Centre Traffic Impact Assessment Issue E – Draft Ref: 17101

Rev Revisions By Date Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD Project Title Sheet Title

Prescott Road

Ruakaka Service Centre Overall Plan SH 1 SH Designed Checked This therefore

drawing

cannot

P Kelly P Kelly is

the

be

property

traced,

of scanned,

Traffic Drawn Approved

Planning

copied,

reproduced,

Consultants T Langwell A Zhong Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd

used Ltd.

It

or

is

exhibited

an

instrument Project No - (Sheet No)

17101 - G by

any

of

third

service,

party -

(7)

without and

as

the such

express

is

a

confidential

permission Date Scales

document.

in 1:1000 27.08.19

writing

of

It (A3) Rev Revisions By Date Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD Project Title Sheet Title

Prescott Road

Ruakaka Service Centre Overall Plan SH 1 SH Designed Checked This therefore

drawing

cannot

P Kelly P Kelly is

the

be

property

traced,

of scanned,

Traffic Drawn Approved

Planning

copied,

reproduced,

Consultants T Langwell A Zhong Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd

used Ltd.

It

or

is

exhibited

an

instrument Project No - (Sheet No)

17101 - G by

any

of

third

service,

party -

(8)

without and

as

the such

express

is

a

confidential

permission Date Scales

document.

in 1:1000 27.08.19

writing

of

It (A3) Rev

Revisions 65m NEW MEDIAN ISLAND MEDIAN NEW 65m By

Date 42.2m Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604

5.3m

1.3m Prescott Road

3.1m 4m

TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD SH 1 SH Project Title Sheet Title

Ruakaka Service Centre Dimension Plan

Deceleration distance required = 150m = required distance Deceleration

Design speed of exit curve = 20 km/h 20 = curve exit of speed Design

Design speed of approach = 100 km/h 100 = approach of speed Design Total length achieved = = achieved length Total

Total length required = 217m = required length Total Diverge length required = 67m = required length Diverge

Guide To Road Design Part 4A Part Design Road To Guide

275m

Austroads 2017 Austroads

Table 5.2 Table 230m Designed Checked This therefore

drawing

cannot

P Kelly P Kelly is

the

be

property

traced,

of scanned,

Traffic Drawn Approved

Planning

copied,

reproduced,

Consultants T Langwell A Zhong Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd

used Ltd.

It

or

is

exhibited

an

instrument Project No - (Sheet No)

17101 - G by

any

of

third

service,

party -

(9)

without and

as

the such

express

is

a

confidential

permission Date Scales

document.

in 1:750 27.08.19

writing

(A3) of

It Rev Revisions By Date Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604

TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD

=140m =140m

MOTSAM Part 2 Figure 3.25 Figure 2 Part MOTSAM

(Rounded to nearest 5m) nearest to (Rounded

= 100x3 / 2.16 / 100x3 = Ld= VxY / 2.16 / VxY Ld= Project Title Sheet Title

Ruakaka Service Centre Dimension Plan 20m Designed Checked This therefore

drawing 20.4m

cannot

P Kelly P Kelly is

the

be

property Prescott Road traced,

of scanned,

3.1m Traffic Drawn Approved

Planning

copied,

reproduced,

Consultants 26.6m T Langwell A Zhong Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd

used Ltd.

It

or

is

exhibited

an

instrument Project No - (Sheet No)

17101 - G by

any

of

third

service, 1 SH party -

(10)

without and

as

the such

express

is

a

confidential

permission Date Scales

document.

in 1:750 27.08.19

writing

(A3) of

It 4.5m

4.5m 103m

consented diverge taper ebd merge taper wbd 75m 65m

4.5m

71.6m

3.2s travel time at 80km/h

Project Title Designed AS Drawn PI Project No - (Sheet No) Scales 1:500 (A3) Ruakaka Service Centre 17101 - G2 - (14) TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD Checked AS Approved TL Date 03.02.21 Sheet Title Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 This drawing is the property of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. It is an instrument of service, and as such is a confidential document. It Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Overall Plan therefore cannot be traced, scanned, copied, reproduced, used or exhibited by any third party without the express permission in writing of Rev Revisions By Date Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd CONSENTED DEVELOPMENT

105m

4m

4.5m

125m 4.5m acceleration lane wbd

4.5m

103m Merge speed = 75km/h Austroads Guide to Road Design Part 4A Table 5.5

Required A (m) including 75m merge taper = 200m

merge taper wbd

75m

Project Title Designed AS Drawn PI Project No - (Sheet No) Scales 1:500 (A3) Ruakaka Service Centre 17101 - G2 - (15) TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD Checked AS Approved TL Date 03.02.21 Sheet Title Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 This drawing is the property of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. It is an instrument of service, and as such is a confidential document. It Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Overall Plan therefore cannot be traced, scanned, copied, reproduced, used or exhibited by any third party without the express permission in writing of Rev Revisions By Date Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd Rev Revisions By Date

Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz

Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 SHEET 1 SHEET

TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD

3.5m End of merge of End

Project Title Sheet Title

=

130m

MOTSAM Part 2 Figure 3.25 Figure 2 Part MOTSAM

(Rounded to nearest 5m) nearest to (Rounded

3.5m

Lm = VxY / 2.16 / VxY = Lm =80x3.5 / 2.16 / =80x3.5 Ruakaka Service Centre

Access Option 1

Diverge taper = taper Diverge

Part 4A, Austroads 2017. Austroads 4A, Part

Guide to Road Design Road to Guide

Fig 8.2 Fig

0.5VF

3.6

= 22m =

= =

0.5x80x2

3.6

suit truck tracking truck suit Compound curves to curves Compound

6m

25m

3.5m

3.5m

3.5m SHEET 2 SHEET

5.4m

26m

3.5m

5m 1.5m

6m

3.5m

suit truck tracking truck suit Compound curves to curves Compound 3.5m 3.5m

52m Designed Checked This therefore

drawing

cannot

is AS AS

the

be

20m

property

traced,

of scanned,

Traffic Drawn Approved

Planning

copied,

200m

reproduced,

Consultants PI TL Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd

MOTSAM Part 2 Figure 3.25 =

130m

(Rounded to nearestLd = VxY 5m) / 2.16 used Ltd. =80x3.5 / 2.16

It

or

is

exhibited

an

instrument Project No - (Sheet No)

17101 - G2-2 by

any

of

third

service, SHEET 3 SHEET

party

without and - (0)

as

the such

express

is

a

confidential

permission Date Scales 65m

diverge taper ebd consented

document.

in 1:1500 (A3) 04.05.21

writing

3.2s travel time at 80km/h

of

It 4.5m

71.6m Rev Revisions By Date Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD Project Title Sheet Title Ruakaka Service Centre Access Option 1 Designed Checked This therefore

drawing

cannot

is AS AS

the

be

property

traced,

of scanned,

Traffic Drawn Approved

Planning

copied,

reproduced,

Consultants PI TL Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd

3.5m

used Ltd.

It merge of End

or

is

exhibited

an

instrument Project No - (Sheet No)

17101 - G2-2 by

any

of

third

service,

party

without and - (1)

as

the such

express

is

a

confidential

permission Date Scales

document.

in 1:500 (A3) 04.05.21

writing

of

It Rev Revisions By

Date =

Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604

130m

MOTSAM Part 2 Figure 3.25 Figure 2 Part MOTSAM

(Rounded to nearest 5m) nearest to (Rounded

3.5m

Lm = VxY / 2.16 / VxY = Lm =80x3.5 / 2.16 / =80x3.5

TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD

Diverge taper = taper Diverge

Part 4A, Austroads 2017. Austroads 4A, Part

Guide to Road Design Road to Guide

Fig 8.2 Fig 0.5VF Project Title

Sheet Title

3.6

= 22m = = = Ruakaka Service Centre

Access Option 1

0.5x80x2

3.6

Compound curves to curves Compound suit truck tracking truck suit

6m

25m

3.5m

3.5m 3.5m

5.4m

26m Designed Checked This therefore

drawing 3.5m

cannot

is AS AS 5m the

be

property

traced, 1.5m

of scanned,

6m

Traffic

Drawn Approved

Planning

copied, 3.5m

reproduced,

Consultants

PI

TL

Compound curves to curves Compound suit truck tracking truck suit Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd 3.5m

used Ltd.

It

or

is

exhibited

an

instrument Project No - (Sheet No) 3.5m

17101 - G2-2 by

any

of

third

service,

party

52m

without and - (2)

as

the such

express

is

a

confidential

permission Date Scales

document.

in 1:500 (A3) 04.05.21

writing

of

It

Rev

Revisions 1.5m

3.5m

Compound curves to curves Compound suit truck tracking truck suit 3.5m

By 3.5m Date

52m Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD

20m Project Title Sheet Title Ruakaka Service Centre Access Option 1

200m

MOTSAM Part 2 Figure 3.25 =

130m

(Rounded to nearestLd = VxY 5m) / 2.16 =80x3.5 / 2.16 Designed Checked This therefore

drawing

cannot

is AS AS

the

be

property

traced,

of scanned,

Traffic Drawn Approved

Planning

copied,

reproduced,

Consultants PI TL Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd

used Ltd.

It

or

is

exhibited

an

instrument Project No - (Sheet No)

17101 - G2-2 by

any

of

third

service,

party

without and - (3)

as

the such

express

is

a

confidential

permission Date Scales

document.

in 1:500 (A3) 04.05.21

writing

of

It

65m Rev Revisions

By Tie into existing median existing into Tie Date

Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604

3.5m

Diverge taper = taper Diverge

Part 4A, Austroads 2017. Austroads 4A, Part

Guide to Road Design Road to Guide

AT - Truck - HPMV - 19.45m Semi-Trailer (Rear steer) steer) (Rear (Rear Semi-Trailer Semi-Trailer 19.45m 19.45m -- HPMV HPMV -- Truck Truck -- AT AT

= 22m =

Fig 8.2 Fig

0.5VF

3.6

= = 0.5x80x2

TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD

3.6

25m to curves Compound suit truck tracking truck suit

6m

1.3m

4.5m

2m

3.5m

Project Title Sheet Title

1.5m 5.4m

AT - Truck - HPMV - 19.45m Semi-Trailer (Rear steer) (Rear Semi-Trailer 19.45m - HPMV - Truck - AT Ruakaka Service Centre steer) (Rear Semi-Trailer 19.45m - HPMV - Truck - AT Access Option 2

1.5m

Compound curves to curves Compound suit truck tracking truck suit

SHEET 1 4m 3.5m

55m

new median island median new 3.5m Designed Checked This therefore

drawing

cannot

is AS AS

the

be

property

traced,

of scanned,

Traffic Drawn Approved

Planning

copied, 4m

reproduced,

Consultants PI TL Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd

used Ltd.

It

or

is

exhibited

an

instrument Project No - (Sheet No)

17101 - G2-4 by

any

of

SHEET 2 third

service,

party

without and - (0)

as

the such

express

is

a

confidential

permission Date Scales

65m

document.

in 1:1000 (A3) 04.05.21

writing

diverge taper ebd consented

of

It

3.2s travel time at 80km/h Rev

Revisions Tie into existing median existing into Tie By Date

Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604

3.5m

Diverge taper = taper Diverge Part 4A, Austroads 2017. Austroads 4A, Part

TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD

Guide to Road Design Road to Guide

AT - Truck - HPMV - 19.45m Semi-Trailer (Rear steer) steer) (Rear (Rear Semi-Trailer Semi-Trailer 19.45m 19.45m -- HPMV HPMV -- Truck Truck -- AT AT

= 22m =

Fig 8.2 Fig

0.5VF

3.6

= =

0.5x80x2 3.6 Project Title

Sheet Title

Compound curves to curves Compound 25m tracking truck suit Ruakaka Service Centre Access Option 2

6m

1.3m

4.5m

2m

3.5m 1.5m 5.4m Designed Checked This therefore

drawing

cannot

AT - Truck - HPMV - 19.45m Semi-Trailer (Rear steer) (Rear Semi-Trailer 19.45m - HPMV - Truck - AT is steer) (Rear Semi-Trailer 19.45m - HPMV - Truck - AT AS AS

the

be

property

traced, 1.5m

of scanned,

Traffic Drawn Approved

Planning

copied,

reproduced,

Consultants PI

TL

Compound curves to curves Compound suit truck tracking truck suit Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd

used Ltd. 4m

It

or

is

exhibited

an

instrument

Project No - (Sheet No) 3.5m

17101 - G2-4 by

any

of

third

service,

party

without and -

(1) 55m

as

the such

new median island median new express

is

a

confidential

permission Date Scales

document.

in 1:500 (A3) 04.05.21

writing

of

It

AT - Truck - HPMV - 19.45m Semi-Trailer (Rear steer) steer) (Rear (Rear Semi-Trailer Semi-Trailer 19.45m 19.45m -- HPMV HPMV -- Truck Truck -- AT AT Rev

Revisions

1.5m

Compound curves to curves Compound suit truck tracking truck suit 4m

By 3.5m Date Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz

Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 55m

new median island median new TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD 3.5m Project Title Sheet Title

Ruakaka Service Centre Access Option 2 4m Designed Checked This therefore

drawing

cannot

is AS AS

the

be

property

traced,

of scanned,

Traffic Drawn Approved

Planning

copied,

reproduced,

Consultants PI TL Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd

used Ltd.

It

or

is

exhibited

an

instrument Project No - (Sheet No)

17101 - G2-4 by

any

of

third

service,

party

without and - (2)

as

the such

express

is

a

confidential

permission Date Scales

document.

in 1:500 (A3) 04.05.21

writing

of

It

65m Rev Revisions By Date

Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz

Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604

SHEET 1 SHEET

4m Tie into existing median existing into Tie

TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD

Diverge taper = taper Diverge

3.5m

Part 4A, Austroads 2017. Austroads 4A, Part Guide to Road Design Road to Guide Project Title

Sheet Title

Fig 8.2 Fig

0.5VF

3.6

= 22m =

= =

0.5x80x2 3.6 Ruakaka Service Centre

Access Option 3

suit truck tracking truck suit Compound curves to curves Compound

6m 25m

5.4m

Compound curves to curves Compound suit truck tracking truck suit

SHEET 2 SHEET

new median island median new

4m

3.5m

4.8m 1.3m Designed Checked This therefore

drawing

cannot

is AS AS

the

be

property

traced,

of scanned,

Traffic Drawn Approved

Planning

copied,

reproduced,

Consultants PI TL Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd

used Ltd.

It

or

is

exhibited

an

instrument Project No - (Sheet No)

17101 - G2-3 by

any

65m

of

third

service,

diverge taper ebd

consented party

without and - (0)

as 4.5m

the such

express

is SHEET 3 SHEET

a

confidential

permission Date Scales

document.

in 1:1500 (A3) 04.05.21

writing

of

It

103m Rev Revisions By Date Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD Project Title Sheet Title

Ruakaka Service Centre Access Option 3

4m Tie into existing median existing into Tie Designed Checked This therefore

drawing

cannot

is AS AS

the

be

property

traced,

of scanned,

Traffic Drawn Approved

Planning

copied,

reproduced,

Consultants PI TL Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd

used Ltd.

It

or

is

exhibited

an

instrument Project No - (Sheet No)

17101 - G2-3 by

any

of

third

service,

party

without and - (1)

as

the such

express

is

a

confidential

permission Date Scales

document.

in 1:500 (A3) 04.05.21

writing

of

It Rev Revisions By

Date

Diverge taper = taper Diverge

3.5m

Part 4A, Austroads 2017. Austroads 4A, Part Guide to Road Design Road to Guide

Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz

Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604

Fig 8.2 Fig

0.5VF

3.6

= 22m =

= =

0.5x80x2 3.6

TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD

Compound curves to curves Compound suit truck tracking truck suit

6m 25m Project Title Sheet Title Ruakaka Service Centre Access Option 3

5.4m

Compound curves to curves Compound suit truck tracking truck suit Designed Checked This therefore

drawing

cannot

is AS AS

the

be

property

traced, new median island median new

of scanned, 4m Traffic Drawn Approved

Planning

copied,

reproduced,

Consultants PI TL

Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd 3.5m

used Ltd.

It

or

is

exhibited

an

instrument Project No - (Sheet No)

17101 - G2-3 by

any

of

third

service, 4.8m 1.3m party

without and - (2)

as

the such

express

is

a

confidential

permission Date Scales

document.

in 1:500 (A3) 04.05.21

writing

of

It Rev Revisions By Date Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD Project Title Sheet Title Ruakaka Service Centre Access Option 3

65m

diverge taper ebd consented Designed Checked This therefore

drawing

cannot

is AS AS

the

be

property

traced,

of scanned,

Traffic 4.5m Drawn Approved

Planning

copied,

reproduced,

Consultants PI TL Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd

used Ltd.

It

or

is

exhibited

an

instrument Project No - (Sheet No)

17101 - G2-3 by

any

of

third

service,

party

without and - (3)

as

the such

express

is

a

confidential

permission Date Scales

document.

in 1:500 (A3) 04.05.21

writing

of

It Rev Revisions By Date

ESPLANADE Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 RESERVE

6000

1m TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD

SHEET 1

GRAZINGFARM

LANDSCAPING

GENERAL

3.5m

1m Project Title Sheet Title Ruakaka Service Centre Access Option 3

1.5m

TRUCK 3.5m PARKING swale

2m STATE HIGHWAY 1 HIGHWAY STATE

swale

260m QSR CAMPER AND TRAILER PARKING TRAILER AND CAMPER 2

PICNIC

BIKE RACKS

swale

CAFE 675m APARTMENT PARKING Designed Checked This therefore

REFUSE COLLECTION AREA (FENCED)

drawing 2

cannot

REST ROOM is AS AS

the ZONE

be

SHEET 2

swale property

traced,

radius) min. published min.

CONVENIENCE (10m Semi-trailer

of scanned,

Traffic

770m Drawn DROP-OFF COACH Approved REMOTE FILL

Planning

copied,

CHARGE

STATIONS 2 TANK FOR CANOPY FUEL LANE 8 RETAIL

reproduced, RETAIL

FORECOURT Consultants BIKE RACKS 370m

PI TL LOADING ZONE LOADING Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd

2

used Ltd.

It

or

is

exhibited

an KIOSK FUEL 330m

instrument Project No - (Sheet No) TANK FOR TRUCKSTOP RECIEVED

TANK

17101 - G_2 by 2

any

of

third

service,

party

-

without and (7)

as

the such

express

is

a

confidential

permission Date Scales

HEIGHT BARRIER LANDSCAPING

GENERAL

document.

in 1:1100 04.05.21

writing

of

It (A3) Rev Revisions By Date Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD

6000

1m Project Title Sheet Title Ruakaka Service Centre Access Option 3 Designed Checked This therefore

drawing

cannot

is AS AS

the

be

property

traced,

LANDSCAPING

of scanned,

Traffic GENERAL Drawn Approved

Planning

copied, 3.5m

reproduced,

Consultants PI TL

Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd 1m

used Ltd.

It

or

is

exhibited

an

instrument Project No - (Sheet No)

17101 - G_2 by

any

of

third

service,

party

-

without and 7- (1)

as

the such

express

is

a

confidential

permission Date Scales 1.5m

document.

in 1:500.0001 04.05.21

writing

of

It

(A3) 3.5m swale Rev Revisions

3.5m

2m STATE HIGHWAY 1 HIGHWAY STATE By Date

Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 CAMPER AND TRAILER PARKING TRAILER AND CAMPER TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD Project Title Sheet Title Ruakaka Service Centre Access Option 3

REMOTE FILL TANK FOR CANOPY FUEL LANE 8 RETAIL FORECOURT Designed Checked This therefore

drawing

cannot

is AS AS

the

be

property

traced,

of scanned,

Traffic Drawn Approved

Planning

copied,

reproduced,

Consultants PI TL Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd

used Ltd.

It

or

is

exhibited

an

instrument Project No - (Sheet No)

17101 - G_2 by

any

of

third

service,

party

-

without and 7- (2)

as

the such

express

is

a

confidential

permission Date Scales

document.

in 1:500 (A3) 04.05.21

writing

of

It SHEET 1 SHEET Rev Revisions By Date

Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 LANDSCAPING

TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD 3.5m

1m GENERAL Project Title Sheet Title

AT - Delivery Van Vehicle Tracking- Van Access Option 3 Ruakaka Service Centre

1.5m

2m This be traced, scanned, copied, reproduced, used or exhibited by any third party without the express permission in writing of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd.

Designed Checked drawing

is

the AS AS

property

of

Traffic

Planning Approved Drawn

Consultants

© swale

Copyright 2021 Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd TL PI

Ltd. 0.948

It Curb to Turning Radius Lock-to-lock time Max Track Width Min Body Ground Clearance Overall Body Height Overall Width Overall Length AT - Delivery Van

is

an

instrument 4.035 6.363 17101 - G_2 Project No - (Sheet No)

of

service,

and -

7- (3) as

such

is

a

confidential Date

Scales document. 7.200m 4.00s 1.810m 0.206m 2.432m 2.050m 6.363m

It 1:300 04.05.21

therefore

CAMPER AND TRAILER PARKING TRAILER AND CAMPER swale (A3)

cannot SHEET 1 SHEET Rev Revisions By Date

Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 LANDSCAPING

TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD 3.5m

1m GENERAL Project Title Sheet Title

AT - Truck - HPMV - 19.45m Semi-Trailer (Rear steer) Vehicle Tracking - Semi-Trailer Access Option 3 Ruakaka Service Centre

1.5m

2m This be traced, scanned, copied, reproduced, used or exhibited by any third party without the express permission in writing of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd.

Designed Checked drawing

is

the AS AS

property

of

Traffic

Planning Approved Drawn

Consultants

© swale

Copyright 2021 Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd TL PI

Ltd.

Wall to Turning Radius Lock-to-lock time Track Width Min Body Ground Clearance Overall Body Height Overall Width Overall Length AT - Truck HPMV 19.45m Semi-Trailer (Rear steer) It 1.33

is

an

instrument 5.33 3.7 7.288 17101 - G_2 Project No - (Sheet No)

of

service, 1.4 Max 10° Vert Max 120° Horiz

and -

7- (4) as

such 9.2 16.633

is

a

confidential Date

Scales document. 1.3 12.500m 6.00s 2.550m 0.311m 4.386m 2.550m 19.380m 1.3

It

1:300 1.3 04.05.21

therefore 0.95 PARKING TRAILER AND CAMPER swale (A3)

cannot

ATTACHMENT 2

ON-SITE VEHICLE TRACKING DIAGRAMS

Ruakaka Service Centre Traffic Impact Assessment Issue E – Draft Ref: 17101

Rev

Revisions

GRAZING

FARM

LANDSCAPING GENERAL By

Date STATE HIGHWAY 1 HIGHWAY STATE Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 3.5m

swale

2.6m

TRUCKSTOP

CAMPER AND TRAILER PARKING TRAILER AND CAMPER swale

TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD

280m QSR

swale

2

PICNIC

to provide buffer to buffer provide to

Ø25m turning circle turning Ø25m

CAFE 800m

swale error driver Project Title

Sheet Title

2 REST ROOM REST

REMOTE FILL 70° ZONE

RETAIL TANK FOR FORECOURT

Ruakaka Service Centre Proposed Development

Overall Plan

CONVENIENCE

CHARGE STATIONS

8 LANE FUEL CANOPY FUEL LANE 8

800m

radius)

min. published min. Semi-trailer (10m Semi-trailer

110°

2

RETAIL

400m

COACH DROP-OFF COACH

2

35° TREATMENT S.S 23.1m

LOADING ZONE LOADING

KIOSK

300m FUEL

23m 8m

2 4m

RECIEVED

TANK 14m

16.5m

TANK FOR

TRUCKSTOP 8m

FARM GRAZING

to provide buffer to buffer provide to

Ø25m turning circle turning Ø25m

driver error driver

BARRIER HEIGHT This be traced, scanned, copied, reproduced, used or exhibited by any third party without the express permission in writing of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd.

Designed Checked drawing

PORT MARSDEN HIGHWAY LANDSCAPING GENERAL

is

the TL AZ

property

of

Traffic

Planning Approved Drawn

Consultants ©

Copyright 2020 Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd TL AZ

Ltd.

It

is

an

MITIGATION ACOUSTIC

instrument

MITIGATION ACOUSTIC R4m Project No - (Sheet No) 17101 - L

of

service, R4m

and -

(1) as R4m such

is

a

confidential 4700 R4m Date

Scales document.

It 1:1000 24.09.20

therefore (A3)

cannot 70°

110° S.S Ø25m turning circle TREATMENT to provide buffer to AT - Truck - HPMV - 19.45m Semi-Trailer (Rear steer) 23.1m driver error AT - Truck - HPMV - 19.45m Semi-Trailer (Rear steer)

4m 8m PICNIC 35°

QSR 8m 280m 2 23m 16.5m

14m

Semi-trailer (10m min. published radius)

CAFE TANK FOR 800m 2 TRUCKSTOP Ø25m turning circle COACH DROP-OFF to provide buffer to REST ROOM ZONE driver error

LOADING ZONE 16.633 CONVENIENCE 7.288 800m 2

Max 120° Horiz 5.33 Max 10° Vert 1.33 3.7 1.4 9.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 0.95

swale AT - Truck - HPMV - 19.45m Semi-Trailer (Rear steer) RETAIL Overall Length 19.380m Overall Width 2.550m 2 Overall Body Height 4.386m 400m Min Body Ground Clearance 0.311m CAMPER AND TRAILER PARKING Track Width 2.550m Lock-to-lock time 6.00s Wall to Wall Turning Radius 12.500m

Project Title Proposed Development Designed AZ Drawn AZ Project No - (Sheet No) Scales 1:500 (A3) Ruakaka Service Centre 17101 - L - (2) TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD Checked TL Approved TL Date 24.09.20 Sheet Title Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 This drawing is the property of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. It is an instrument of service, and as such is a confidential document. It therefore cannot be traced, scanned, copied, reproduced, used or exhibited by any third party without the express permission in writing of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Vehicle Tracking - HPMV Semi Trailer Rev Revisions By Date © Copyright 2020 Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd 70°

110° S.S Ø25m turning circle TREATMENT to provide buffer to AT - Truck - HPMV - 19.45m Semi-Trailer (Rear steer) 23.1m driver error

AT - Truck - HPMV - 19.45m Semi-Trailer (Rear steer)

4m 8m PICNIC 35°

QSR 8m 280m 2 23m 16.5m

14m

Semi-trailer (10m min. published radius)

CAFE TANK FOR 800m 2 TRUCKSTOP Ø25m turning circle COACH DROP-OFF to provide buffer to REST ROOM ZONE driver error

LOADING ZONE 16.633 CONVENIENCE 7.288 800m 2

Max 120° Horiz 5.33 Max 10° Vert 1.33 3.7 1.4 9.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 0.95

swale AT - Truck - HPMV - 19.45m Semi-Trailer (Rear steer) RETAIL Overall Length 19.380m Overall Width 2.550m 2 Overall Body Height 4.386m 400m Min Body Ground Clearance 0.311m CAMPER AND TRAILER PARKING Track Width 2.550m Lock-to-lock time 6.00s Wall to Wall Turning Radius 12.500m

Project Title Proposed Development Designed AZ Drawn AZ Project No - (Sheet No) Scales 1:500 (A3) Ruakaka Service Centre 17101 - L - (3) TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD Checked TL Approved TL Date 24.09.20 Sheet Title Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 This drawing is the property of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. It is an instrument of service, and as such is a confidential document. It therefore cannot be traced, scanned, copied, reproduced, used or exhibited by any third party without the express permission in writing of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Vehicle Tracking - HPMV Semi Trailer Rev Revisions By Date © Copyright 2020 Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd 70°

110° S.S Ø25m turning circle TREATMENT to provide buffer to AT - Truck - HPMV - 19.45m Semi-Trailer (Rear steer) 23.1m driver error

4m 8m AT - Truck - HPMV - 19.45m Semi-Trailer (Rear steer) PICNIC 35°

QSR 8m 2 23m 280m AT - Truck - HPMV - 19.45m Semi-Trailer (Rear steer) 16.5m

14m

Semi-trailer (10m min. published radius)

CAFE TANK FOR 800m 2 TRUCKSTOP Ø25m turning circle COACH DROP-OFF to provide buffer to REST ROOM ZONE driver error

LOADING ZONE 16.633 CONVENIENCE 7.288 800m 2

Max 120° Horiz 5.33 Max 10° Vert 1.33 3.7 1.4 9.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 0.95

swale AT - Truck - HPMV - 19.45m Semi-Trailer (Rear steer) RETAIL Overall Length 19.380m Overall Width 2.550m 2 Overall Body Height 4.386m 400m Min Body Ground Clearance 0.311m CAMPER AND TRAILER PARKING Track Width 2.550m Lock-to-lock time 6.00s Wall to Wall Turning Radius 12.500m

Project Title Proposed Development Designed AZ Drawn AZ Project No - (Sheet No) Scales 1:500 (A3) Ruakaka Service Centre 17101 - L - (4) TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD Checked TL Approved TL Date 24.09.20 Sheet Title Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 This drawing is the property of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. It is an instrument of service, and as such is a confidential document. It therefore cannot be traced, scanned, copied, reproduced, used or exhibited by any third party without the express permission in writing of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Vehicle Tracking - HPMV Semi Trailer Rev Revisions By Date © Copyright 2020 Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd 70°

110° S.S Ø25m turning circle TREATMENT to provide buffer to AT - Truck - HPMV - 19.45m Semi-Trailer (Rear steer) 23.1m driver error

4m 8m AT - Truck - HPMV - 19.45m Semi-Trailer (Rear steer) PICNIC 35°

QSR 8m 280m 2 23m 16.5m AT - Truck - HPMV - 19.45m Semi-Trailer (Rear steer)

14m

Semi-trailer (10m min. published radius)

CAFE TANK FOR 800m 2 TRUCKSTOP Ø25m turning circle COACH DROP-OFF to provide buffer to REST ROOM ZONE driver error

LOADING ZONE 16.633 CONVENIENCE 7.288 800m 2

Max 120° Horiz 5.33 Max 10° Vert 1.33 3.7 1.4 9.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 0.95

swale AT - Truck - HPMV - 19.45m Semi-Trailer (Rear steer) RETAIL Overall Length 19.380m Overall Width 2.550m 2 Overall Body Height 4.386m 400m Min Body Ground Clearance 0.311m Track Width 2.550m Lock-to-lock time 6.00s Wall to Wall Turning Radius 12.500m

Project Title Proposed Development Designed AZ Drawn AZ Project No - (Sheet No) Scales 1:500 (A3) Ruakaka Service Centre 17101 - L - (5) TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD Checked TL Approved TL Date 24.09.20 Sheet Title Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 This drawing is the property of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. It is an instrument of service, and as such is a confidential document. It therefore cannot be traced, scanned, copied, reproduced, used or exhibited by any third party without the express permission in writing of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Vehicle Tracking - HPMV Semi Trailer Rev Revisions By Date © Copyright 2020 Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd 70°

110° S.S Ø25m turning circle TREATMENT to provide buffer to AT - Truck - HPMV - 19.45m Semi-Trailer (Rear steer) 23.1m driver error

4m 8m PICNIC 35° AT - Truck - HPMV - 19.45m Semi-Trailer (Rear steer)

QSR 8m 280m 2 23m 16.5m

14m AT - Truck - HPMV - 19.45m Semi-Trailer (Rear steer)

Semi-trailer (10m min. published radius)

CAFE TANK FOR 800m 2 TRUCKSTOP Ø25m turning circle COACH DROP-OFF to provide buffer to REST ROOM ZONE driver error

LOADING ZONE 16.633 CONVENIENCE 7.288 800m 2

Max 120° Horiz 5.33 Max 10° Vert 1.33 3.7 1.4 9.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 0.95

swale AT - Truck - HPMV - 19.45m Semi-Trailer (Rear steer) RETAIL Overall Length 19.380m Overall Width 2.550m 2 Overall Body Height 4.386m 400m Min Body Ground Clearance 0.311m CAMPER AND TRAILER PARKING Track Width 2.550m Lock-to-lock time 6.00s Wall to Wall Turning Radius 12.500m

Project Title Proposed Development Designed AZ Drawn AZ Project No - (Sheet No) Scales 1:500 (A3) Ruakaka Service Centre 17101 - L - (6) TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD Checked TL Approved TL Date 24.09.20 Sheet Title Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 This drawing is the property of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. It is an instrument of service, and as such is a confidential document. It therefore cannot be traced, scanned, copied, reproduced, used or exhibited by any third party without the express permission in writing of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Vehicle Tracking - HPMV Semi Trailer Rev Revisions By Date © Copyright 2020 Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd 70°

110° S.S Ø25m turning circle TREATMENT to provide buffer to 23.1m driver error

4m 8m PICNIC 35°

QSR 8m 280m 2 23m 16.5m

14m

Semi-trailer (10m min. published radius)

CAFE AT - Truck - HPMV - 19.45m Semi-Trailer (Rear steer)TANK FOR 800m 2 TRUCKSTOP Ø25m turning circle COACH DROP-OFF to provide buffer to REST ROOM ZONE driver error

LOADING ZONE 16.633 CONVENIENCE 7.288 800m 2

Max 120° Horiz 5.33 Max 10° Vert 1.33 3.7 1.4 9.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 0.95

swale AT - Truck - HPMV - 19.45m Semi-Trailer (Rear steer) RETAIL Overall Length 19.380m Overall Width 2.550m 2 Overall Body Height 4.386m 400m Min Body Ground Clearance 0.311m CAMPER AND TRAILER PARKING Track Width 2.550m Lock-to-lock time 6.00s Wall to Wall Turning Radius 12.500m

Project Title Proposed Development Designed AZ Drawn AZ Project No - (Sheet No) Scales 1:500 (A3) Ruakaka Service Centre 17101 - L - (7) TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD Checked TL Approved TL Date 24.09.20 Sheet Title Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 This drawing is the property of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. It is an instrument of service, and as such is a confidential document. It therefore cannot be traced, scanned, copied, reproduced, used or exhibited by any third party without the express permission in writing of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Vehicle Tracking - HPMV Semi Trailer Rev Revisions By Date © Copyright 2020 Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd AT - Truck - HPMV - 19.45m Semi-Trailer (Rear steer) FARM GRAZING 70°

110°

TRUCKSTOP Ø25m turning circle to provide buffer to driver error

AT - Truck - HPMV - 19.45m Semi-Trailer (Rear steer)

PICNIC 35°

QSR 280m 2

16.633 7.288

GENERAL swale Semi-trailer (10m min. published radius) Max 120° Horiz LANDSCAPING 5.33 Max 10° Vert 1.33 3.7 1.4 CAFE 9.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 0.95 swale 2 AT - Truck - HPMV - 19.45m Semi-Trailer (Rear steer) 800m Overall Length 19.380m Overall Width 2.550mCOACH DROP-OFF Overall Body Height 4.386m Min Body Ground Clearance 0.311m Track Width 2.550m Lock-to-lock time 6.00s RESTWall to Wall Turning ROOM Radius 12.500m ZONE Project Title Proposed Development Designed AZ Drawn AZ Project No - (Sheet No) Scales 1:500 (A3) Ruakaka Service Centre 17101 - L - (8) TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD Checked TL Approved TL Date 24.09.20 Sheet Title Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 This drawing is the property of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. It is an instrument of service, and as such is a confidential document. It therefore cannot be traced, scanned, copied, reproduced, used or exhibited by any third party without the express permission in writing of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Vehicle Tracking - HPMV Semi Trailer Rev Revisions By Date © Copyright 2020 Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd Ø25m turning circle to provide buffer to driver error

R4m R4m

4m ACOUSTIC 8m MITIGATION 35° R4m

8m 23m

AT - Truck - BP Fuel Tanker (Rear steer) 16.5m

14m

Semi-trailer (10m min. published radius)

CAFE TANK FOR 800m 2 TRUCKSTOP Ø25m turning circle COACH DROP-OFF to provide buffer to REST ROOM ZONE driver error

LOADING ZONE CONVENIENCE 800m 2

RETAIL 400m 2

14.14 AT - Truck - BP Fuel Tanker (Rear steer) 7.288

RECIEVED HEIGHT TANK BARRIER swale

Max 120° Horiz CHARGE 5.33 Max 10° Vert 1.33 3.59 1.4 STATIONS FUEL 7.88 1.3 1.3 1.3 0.82 AT - Truck - BP Fuel Tanker (Rear steer) KIOSK Overall Length 17.930m 2 Overall Width 2.550m Overall Body Height 4.386m 300m Min Body Ground Clearance 0.311m GENERAL Track Width 2.550m Lock-to-lock time 6.00s LANDSCAPING Wall to Wall Turning Radius 12.500m 8 LANE FUEL CANOPY REMOTE FILL Project Title Proposed Development Designed AZ Drawn AZ Project No - (Sheet No) Scales 1:500 (A3) Ruakaka Service Centre 17101 - L - (9) TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD Checked TL Approved TL Date 24.09.20 Sheet Title Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 This drawing is the property of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. It is an instrument of service, and as such is a confidential document. It therefore cannot be traced, scanned, copied, reproduced, used or exhibited by any third party without the express permission in writing of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Vehicle Tracking - 17.9m Tanker Rev Revisions By Date © Copyright 2020 Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd Ø25m turning circle to provide buffer to driver error

R4m R4m

4m ACOUSTIC 8m MITIGATION 35° R4m

8m 23m

16.5m

14m

Semi-trailer (10m min. published radius)

CAFE TANK FOR 800m 2 TRUCKSTOP Ø25m turning circle COACH DROP-OFF to provide buffer to REST ROOM ZONE driver error

LOADING ZONE CONVENIENCE 800m 2 AT - Truck - BP Fuel Tanker (Rear steer)

RETAIL 400m 2

14.14 7.288 AT - Truck - BP Fuel Tanker (Rear steer)

RECIEVED HEIGHT TANK BARRIER swale

Max 120° Horiz CHARGE 5.33 Max 10° Vert 1.33 3.59 1.4 STATIONS FUEL 7.88 1.3 1.3 1.3 0.82 AT - Truck - BP Fuel Tanker (Rear steer) KIOSK Overall Length 17.930m 2 Overall Width 2.550m Overall Body Height 4.386m 300m Min Body Ground Clearance 0.311m GENERAL Track Width 2.550m Lock-to-lock time 6.00s LANDSCAPING Wall to Wall Turning Radius 12.500m 8 LANE FUEL CANOPY REMOTE FILL Project Title Proposed Development Designed AZ Drawn AZ Project No - (Sheet No) Scales 1:500 (A3) Ruakaka Service Centre 17101 - L - (10) TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD Checked TL Approved TL Date 24.09.20 Sheet Title Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 This drawing is the property of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. It is an instrument of service, and as such is a confidential document. It therefore cannot be traced, scanned, copied, reproduced, used or exhibited by any third party without the express permission in writing of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Vehicle Tracking - 17.9m Tanker Rev Revisions By Date © Copyright 2020 Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd Ø25m turning circle to provide buffer to driver error

R4m R4m

4m ACOUSTIC 8m MITIGATION 35°AT - Truck - 22.0m Fuel Tanker R4m

8m 23m

16.5m

14m

Semi-trailer (10m min. published radius)

CAFE TANK FOR 800m 2 TRUCKSTOP Ø25m turning circle COACH DROP-OFF to provide buffer to REST ROOM ZONE driver error

LOADING ZONE CONVENIENCE 800m 2

RETAIL 400m 2

7.5 9 6

RECIEVED HEIGHT TANKAT - Truck - 22.0m Fuel Tanker BARRIER swale Max 72° Horiz Max 72° Horiz 4.6 Max 10° Vert 6.25 Max 10° Vert 1.25 2.65 1.4 3 0.508 CHARGE 4.5 1.4 0.6 6.5 1.4 0.6 STATIONS FUEL AT - Truck - 22.0m Fuel Tanker KIOSK Overall Length 22.350m Overall Width 2.550m 2 Overall Body Height 3.750m Min Body Ground Clearance 0.311m 300m Track Width 2.550m GENERAL Lock-to-lock time 6.00s LANDSCAPING Wall to Wall Turning Radius 12.000m 8 LANE FUEL CANOPY REMOTE FILL Project Title Proposed Development Designed AZ Drawn AZ Project No - (Sheet No) Scales 1:500 (A3) Ruakaka Service Centre 17101 - L - (11) TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD Checked TL Approved TL Date 24.09.20 Sheet Title Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 This drawing is the property of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. It is an instrument of service, and as such is a confidential document. It therefore cannot be traced, scanned, copied, reproduced, used or exhibited by any third party without the express permission in writing of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Vehicle Tracking - 22m Tanker Rev Revisions By Date © Copyright 2020 Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd Ø25m turning circle to provide buffer to driver error

R4m R4m

4m ACOUSTIC 8m MITIGATION 35° R4m

8m 23m

16.5m

14m

Semi-trailer (10m min. published radius)

CAFE TANK FOR 800m 2 TRUCKSTOP Ø25m turning circle COACH DROP-OFF to provide buffer to REST ROOM ZONE driver error AT - Truck - 22.0m Fuel Tanker

LOADING ZONE CONVENIENCE 800m 2

RETAIL 400m 2

7.5 9 6

RECIEVED HEIGHT TANK BARRIER swale Max 72° Horiz Max 72° Horiz 4.6 Max 10° Vert 6.25 Max 10° Vert 1.25 2.65 1.4 3 0.508 CHARGE 4.5 1.4 0.6 6.5 1.4 0.6 STATIONS FUEL AT - Truck - 22.0m Fuel Tanker KIOSK Overall Length 22.350m Overall Width 2.550m 2 Overall Body Height 3.750m Min Body Ground Clearance 0.311m 300m Track Width 2.550m GENERAL Lock-to-lock time 6.00s LANDSCAPING Wall to Wall Turning Radius 12.000m 8 LANE FUEL CANOPY REMOTE FILL Project Title Proposed Development Designed AZ Drawn AZ Project No - (Sheet No) Scales 1:500 (A3) Ruakaka Service Centre 17101 - L - (12) TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD Checked TL Approved TL Date 24.09.20 Sheet Title Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 This drawing is the property of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. It is an instrument of service, and as such is a confidential document. It therefore cannot be traced, scanned, copied, reproduced, used or exhibited by any third party without the express permission in writing of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Vehicle Tracking - 22m Tanker Rev Revisions By Date © Copyright 2020 Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd QSR 8m 280m 2 23m

B99 Vehicle + 4.3m Trailer

GENERAL swale Semi-trailer (10m min. published LANDSCAPING radius) CAFE swale 800m 2 COACH DROP-OFF REST ROOM ZONE

2.6m LOADING ZONE CONVENIENCE 800m 2

3.5m

swale RETAIL 400m 2 CAMPER AND TRAILER PARKING

swale

CHARGE STATIONS FUEL KIOSK 300m

4.3 5.28 LANE0.4 FUEL CANOPY REMOTE FILL

Max 70° Horiz Max 10° Vert 0.95 3.05 2.55 0.8 0.95

STATE HIGHWAY 1 B99 Vehicle + 4.3m Trailer Overall Length 9.900m Overall Width 1.940m TANKOverall FOR Body Height 2.200m RETAILMin Body Ground Clearance 0.312m Max Track Width 1.840m FORECOURTLock-to-lock time 4.00s Curb to Curb Turning Radius 6.250m

Project Title Proposed Development Designed AZ Drawn AZ Project No - (Sheet No) Scales 1:500 (A3) Ruakaka Service Centre 17101 - L - (13) TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD Checked TL Approved TL Date 24.09.20 Sheet Title Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 This drawing is the property of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. It is an instrument of service, and as such is a confidential document. It therefore cannot be traced, scanned, copied, reproduced, used or exhibited by any third party without the express permission in writing of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Vehicle Tracking - B99 & Trailer Rev Revisions By Date © Copyright 2020 Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd QSR 8m 280m 2 23m

B99 Vehicle + 4.3m Trailer GENERAL swale Semi-trailer (10m min. published LANDSCAPING radius) CAFE swale 800m 2 COACH DROP-OFF REST ROOM ZONE

2.6m LOADING ZONE CONVENIENCE 800m 2

3.5m

swale RETAIL 400m 2 CAMPER AND TRAILER PARKING

swale

CHARGE STATIONS FUEL KIOSK 300m

4.3 5.28 LANE0.4 FUEL CANOPY REMOTE FILL

Max 70° Horiz Max 10° Vert 0.95 3.05 2.55 0.8 0.95

STATE HIGHWAY 1 B99 Vehicle + 4.3m Trailer Overall Length 9.900m Overall Width 1.940m TANKOverall FOR Body Height 2.200m RETAILMin Body Ground Clearance 0.312m Max Track Width 1.840m FORECOURTLock-to-lock time 4.00s Curb to Curb Turning Radius 6.250m

Project Title Proposed Development Designed AZ Drawn AZ Project No - (Sheet No) Scales 1:500 (A3) Ruakaka Service Centre 17101 - L - (14) TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD Checked TL Approved TL Date 24.09.20 Sheet Title Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 This drawing is the property of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. It is an instrument of service, and as such is a confidential document. It therefore cannot be traced, scanned, copied, reproduced, used or exhibited by any third party without the express permission in writing of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Vehicle Tracking - B99 & Trailer Rev Revisions By Date © Copyright 2020 Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd QSR 8m 280m 2 23m

AT - 85th - Car with Caravan

GENERAL swale Semi-trailer (10m min. published LANDSCAPING radius) CAFE swale 800m 2 COACH DROP-OFF REST ROOM ZONE

2.6m LOADING ZONE CONVENIENCE 800m 2

3.5m

swale RETAIL 400m 2 CAMPER AND TRAILER PARKING

swale

CHARGE STATIONS FUEL KIOSK 300m

8.2 4.8888 LANE0.329 FUEL CANOPY REMOTE FILL

Max 70° Horiz Max 10° Vert 0.907 2.854 STATE HIGHWAY 1 5.36 1.3 2.34 AT - 85th - Car with Caravan Overall Length 14.217m TANKOverall FOR Width 2.500m Overall Body Height 2.525m RETAILMin Body Ground Clearance 0.138m FORECOURTMax Track Width 2.400m Lock-to-lock time 4.00s Curb to Curb Turning Radius 5.950m

Project Title Proposed Development Designed AZ Drawn AZ Project No - (Sheet No) Scales 1:500 (A3) Ruakaka Service Centre 17101 - L - (15) TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD Checked TL Approved TL Date 24.09.20 Sheet Title Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 This drawing is the property of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. It is an instrument of service, and as such is a confidential document. It therefore cannot be traced, scanned, copied, reproduced, used or exhibited by any third party without the express permission in writing of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Vehicle Tracking - Car & Caravan Rev Revisions By Date © Copyright 2020 Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd QSR 8m 280m 2 23m

AT - 85th - Car with Caravan

GENERAL swale Semi-trailer (10m min. published LANDSCAPING radius) CAFE swale 800m 2 COACH DROP-OFF REST ROOM ZONE

2.6m LOADING ZONE CONVENIENCE 800m 2

3.5m

swale RETAIL 400m 2 CAMPER AND TRAILER PARKING

swale

CHARGE STATIONS FUEL KIOSK 300m

8.2 4.8888 LANE0.329 FUEL CANOPY REMOTE FILL

Max 70° Horiz Max 10° Vert 0.907 2.854 STATE HIGHWAY 1 5.36 1.3 2.34 AT - 85th - Car with Caravan Overall Length 14.217m TANKOverall FOR Width 2.500m Overall Body Height 2.525m RETAILMin Body Ground Clearance 0.138m FORECOURTMax Track Width 2.400m Lock-to-lock time 4.00s Curb to Curb Turning Radius 5.950m

Project Title Proposed Development Designed AZ Drawn AZ Project No - (Sheet No) Scales 1:500 (A3) Ruakaka Service Centre 17101 - L - (16) TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD Checked TL Approved TL Date 24.09.20 Sheet Title Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 This drawing is the property of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. It is an instrument of service, and as such is a confidential document. It therefore cannot be traced, scanned, copied, reproduced, used or exhibited by any third party without the express permission in writing of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Vehicle Tracking - Car & Caravan Rev Revisions By Date © Copyright 2020 Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd 70°

110° S.S TRUCKSTOP TREATMENT (AT Design Vehicle) - 12.6m Tour Coach (RTS18) Ø25m turning circle to provide buffer to 23.1m driver error

4m 8m PICNIC 35°

QSR 8m 280m 2 23m 16.5m

(AT Design Vehicle) - 12.6m Tour Coach (RTS18) 14m

(AT Design Vehicle) - 12.6m Tour Coach (RTS18)

Semi-trailer (10m min. published radius)

CAFE TANK FOR swale (AT Design Vehicle) - 12.6m Tour Coach (RTS18) 800m 2 TRUCKSTOP Ø25m turning circle COACH DROP-OFF to provide buffer to

REST ROOM 12.6 ZONE driver error

LOADING ZONE 2.35 6.25 1.35

CONVENIENCE (AT Design Vehicle) - 12.6m Tour Coach (RTS18) Overall Length 12.600m 2 Overall Width 2.550m 800m Overall Body Height 3.311m Min Body Ground Clearance 0.268m Track Width 2.550m Lock-to-lock time 6.00s Wall to Wall Turning Radius 12.500m

Project Title Proposed Development Designed AZ Drawn AZ Project No - (Sheet No) Scales 1:500 (A3) Ruakaka Service Centre 17101 - L - (17) TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD Checked TL Approved TL Date 24.09.20 Sheet Title Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 This drawing is the property of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. It is an instrument of service, and as such is a confidential document. It therefore cannot be traced, scanned, copied, reproduced, used or exhibited by any third party without the express permission in writing of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Vehicle Tracking - RTS Tour Coach Rev Revisions By Date © Copyright 2020 Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd 110°

Ø25m turning circle TREATMENT to provide buffer to 23.1m driver error

R4m

4m ACOUSTIC 8m MITIGATION PICNIC 35°

8m 23m

16.5m

14m

Semi-trailer (10m (AT Design Vehicle) - 12.6m Tour Coachmin. (RTS18) published radius)

CAFE TANK FOR 800m 2 TRUCKSTOP Ø25m turning circle COACH DROP-OFF (AT Design Vehicle) - 12.6m Tour Coach (RTS18) to provide buffer to REST ROOM ZONE driver error

(AT Design Vehicle) - 12.6m Tour Coach (RTS18)

LOADING ZONE CONVENIENCE 800m 2 (AT Design Vehicle) - 12.6m Tour Coach (RTS18)

RETAIL 12.6 400m 2

2.35 6.25 1.35

(AT Design Vehicle) - 12.6m Tour Coach (RTS18) Overall Length 12.600m RECIEVED HEIGHT Overall Width 2.550m Overall Body Height 3.311m TANK BARRIER Min Body Ground Clearance 0.268m swale Track Width 2.550m Lock-to-lock time 6.00s Wall to Wall Turning Radius 12.500m CHARGE STATIONS FUEL

KIOSK Project Title Proposed Development Designed AZ Drawn AZ Project No - (Sheet No) Scales 1:500 (A3) Ruakaka Service Centre 17101 - L - (18) TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD Checked TL Approved TL Date 24.09.20 Sheet Title Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 This drawing is the property of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. It is an instrument of service, and as such is a confidential document. It therefore cannot be traced, scanned, copied, reproduced, used or exhibited by any third party without the express permission in writing of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Vehicle Tracking - RTS Tour Coach Rev Revisions By Date © Copyright 2020 Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd QSR 280m 2

B99 Vehicle (Realistic min radius) (2004)

swale

swale

5.2

0.95 3.05

B99 Vehicle (Realistic min radius) (2004) Overall Length 5.200m Overall Width 1.940m Overall Body Height 2.200m Min Body Ground Clearance 0.312m Track Width 1.840m Lock-to-lock time 4.00s Curb to Curb Turning Radius 6.250m 2.6m Project Title Proposed Development Designed AZ Drawn AZ Project No - (Sheet No) Scales 1:250 (A3) Ruakaka Service Centre 17101 - L - (19) TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD Checked TL Approved TL Date 24.09.20 Sheet Title Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 This drawing is the property of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. It is an instrument of service, and as such is a confidential document. It therefore cannot be traced, scanned, copied, reproduced, used or exhibited by any third party without the express permission in writing of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Vehicle Tracking - B99 Rev Revisions By Date © Copyright 2020 Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd R4m R4m

ACOUSTIC MITIGATION

R4m R4m

B99 Vehicle (Realistic min radius) (2004)

B99 Vehicle (Realistic min radius) (2004)

5.2

0.95 3.05

B99 Vehicle (Realistic min radius) (2004) Overall Length 5.200m Overall Width 1.940m Overall Body Height 2.200m Min Body Ground Clearance 0.312m Track Width 1.840m Lock-to-lock time 4.00s 4700 Curb to Curb Turning Radius 6.250m

Project Title Proposed Development Designed AZ Drawn AZ Project No - (Sheet No) Scales 1:250 (A3) Ruakaka Service Centre 17101 - L - (20) TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD Checked TL Approved TL Date 24.09.20 Sheet Title Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 This drawing is the property of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. It is an instrument of service, and as such is a confidential document. It therefore cannot be traced, scanned, copied, reproduced, used or exhibited by any third party without the express permission in writing of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Vehicle Tracking - B99 Rev Revisions By Date © Copyright 2020 Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd R4m R4m B99 Vehicle (Realistic min radius) (2004)

ACOUSTIC MITIGATION

R4m R4m

5.2

0.95 3.05

B99 Vehicle (Realistic min radius) (2004) Overall Length 5.200m Overall Width 1.940m Overall Body Height 2.200m Min Body Ground Clearance 0.312m Track Width 1.840m Lock-to-lock time 4.00s 4700 Curb to Curb Turning Radius 6.250m

Project Title Proposed Development Designed AZ Drawn AZ Project No - (Sheet No) Scales 1:250 (A3) Ruakaka Service Centre 17101 - L - (21) TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD Checked TL Approved TL Date 24.09.20 Sheet Title Level 1, 400 Titirangi Rd, Titirangi, P.O Box 60-255, Auckland 0604 This drawing is the property of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. It is an instrument of service, and as such is a confidential document. It therefore cannot be traced, scanned, copied, reproduced, used or exhibited by any third party without the express permission in writing of Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd. Phone: 09 817-2500 www.trafficplanning.co.nz Vehicle Tracking - B99 Rev Revisions By Date © Copyright 2020 Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd

ATTACHMENT 3

INDEPENDENT ROAD SAFETY AUDIT REPORT WITH DESIGNER RESPONSES

Ruakaka Service Centre Traffic Impact Assessment Issue E – Draft Ref: 17101

PRELIMINARY DESIGN ROAD SAFETY AUDIT RUAKĀKĀ SERVICE CENTRE PREPARED FOR TRAFFIC PLANNING CONSULTANTS 18 March 2021

This document has been prepared for the benefit of Traffic Planning Consultants. No liability is accepted by this company or any employee or sub-consultant of this company with respect to its use by any other person. This disclaimer shall apply notwithstanding that the report may be made available to Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency and other persons for an application for permission or approval to fulfil a legal requirement.

QUALITY STATEMENT

PROJECT MANAGER ROAD SAFETY AUDIT TEAM LEADER Mark Moslin-Thomas Keith Weale

PREPARED BY

Keith Weale 18 March 2012

CHECKED BY

Nick Gluyas 18 March 2012

REVIEWED BY

Nick Gluyas 18 March 2012

APPROVED FOR ISSUE BY

Mark Moslin-Thomas 24 March 2021

AUCKLAND Level 3 Stantec House, 111 Carlton Gore Road, Newmarket, Auckland 1023 PO Box 13-052, Armagh, Christchurch 8141 TEL +64 9 580 4500

Stantec │ Ruakākā Service Centre │ 18 March 2021

Status: Final │ Project No.: 310204673 Child No.: 100.100 │ Our ref: rpt_ruakaka_serv_ctr_RSA_final - draft designer responses.docx

Stantec │ Ruakākā Service Centre │ 18 March 2021

Status: Final │ Project No.: 310204673 Child No.: 100.100 │ Our ref: rpt_ruakaka_serv_ctr_RSA_final - draft designer responses.docx │ Page i

Traffic Planning Consultants Ruakākā Service Centre

CONTENTS 1 Introduction ...... 1 1.1 Safety Audit Definition and Purpose ...... 1 1.2 The Project ...... 2 1.3 The Road Safety Audit Team ...... 2 1.4 Previous Road Safety Audits ...... 2 1.5 Scope of this Road Safety Audit ...... 3 1.6 Briefing and Exit Meeting ...... 3 1.7 Safety Audit and Site Visit ...... 3 1.8 Report Format ...... 3 1.9 Documents Provided ...... 4 1.10 Disclaimer ...... 4 2 Safety Concerns ...... 6 2.1 SH1 Access ...... 6 2.2 Service Centre Internal Layout ...... 7 2.3 SH15 Access ...... 9 2.4 Property Access ...... 12 2.5 Pedestrians ...... 14 2.6 Lighting ...... 15 3 Audit Statement ...... 16 4 Response and Decision Statements ...... 17 4.1 Designer’s Responses ...... 17 4.2 Safety Engineer’s Comments (if applicable) ...... 17 4.3 Project Manager’s Decisions...... 17 4.4 Designer’s Statement ...... 17 4.5 Safety Audit Close Out ...... 18 5 References ...... 19

LIST OF TABLES Table 1-1: Concern Assessment Rating Matrix ...... 3 Table 1-2: Concern Categories ...... 4

Stantec │ Ruakākā Service Centre │ 18 March 2021

Status: Final │ Project No.: 310204673 Child No.: 100.100 │ Our ref: rpt_ruakaka_serv_ctr_RSA_final - draft designer responses.docx

LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Site location ...... 2 Figure 2: Proposed high-speed left -turn deceleration lane ...... 6 Figure 3: Proposed raised table intersection at service centre threshold ...... 6 Figure 4: Pedestrian crossings in car park ...... 7 Figure 5: Typical retrofitted speed hump on entrance (Google, 2009) ...... 8 Figure 6: Typical retrofitted speed hump on internal road layout in service centre (Google, 2009) ...... 8 Figure 7: Proposed seagull intersection ...... 9 Figure 8: Downstream weave from seagull intersection to roundabout ...... 11 Figure 9: Property accesses off SH15 ...... 13 Figure 10: Missing connection G.A.S. forecourt and footpath to Ruakākā service centre (Google, 2009) .. 14

Stantec │ Ruakākā Service Centre │ 18 March 2021

Status: Final │ Project No.: 310204673 Child No.: 100.100 │ Our ref: rpt_ruakaka_serv_ctr_RSA_final - draft designer responses.docx

1 Introduction 1.1 Safety Audit Definition and Purpose A road safety audit is a term used internationally to describe an independent review of a future road project to identify any safety concerns that may affect the safety performance. The audit team considers the safety of all road users and qualitatively reports on road safety issues or opportunities for safety improvement. A road safety audit is therefore a formal examination of a road project, or any type of project which affects road users (including cyclists, pedestrians, mobility impaired etc.), carried out by an independent competent team who identify and document road safety concerns. A road safety audit is intended to help deliver a safe road system and is not a review of compliance with standards. The primary objective of a road safety audit is to deliver a project that achieves an outcome consistent with Safer Journeys and the Safe System approach, which is a safe road system free of death and serious injury. The road safety audit is a safety review used to identify all areas of a project that are inconsistent with a Safe System and bring those concerns to the attention of the client so that the client can make a value judgement as to appropriate action(s) based on the risk guidance provided by the safety audit team. The key objective of a road safety audit is summarised as: ‘to deliver completed projects that contribute towards a safe road system that is free of death and serious injury by identifying and ranking potential safety concerns for all road users and others affected by a road project.’ A road safety audit should desirably be undertaken at project milestones such as: • concept stage (part of business case);

• scheme or preliminary design stage (part of pre-implementation);

• detail design stage (pre-implementation or implementation); or

• pre-opening or post-construction stage (implementation or post-implementation).

A road safety audit is not intended to be a technical or financial audit and does not substitute for a design check of standards or guidelines. Any recommended treatment of an identified safety concern is intended to be indicative only, and to focus the designer on the type of improvements that might be appropriate. It is not intended to be prescriptive and other ways of improving the road safety or operational problems identified should also be considered. In accordance with the procedures set down in the NZTA Road Safety Audit Procedures for Projects Guidelines - Interim release May 2013 the audit report should be submitted to the client who will instruct the designer to respond. The designer should consider the report and comment to the client on each of any concerns identified, including their cost implications where appropriate, and make a recommendation to either accept or reject the audit report recommendation. For each audit team recommendation that is accepted, the client will make the final decision and brief the designer to make the necessary changes and/or additions. As a result of this instruction the designer shall action the approved amendments. The client may involve a safety engineer to provide commentary to aid with the decision. Decision tracking is an important part of the road safety audit process. A decision tracking table is embedded into the report format at the end of each set of recommendations. It is to be completed by the designer, safety engineer, and client for each issue, and should record the designer’s response, client’s decision (and asset manager's comments in the case where the client and asset manager are not one and the same) and action taken. A copy of the report including the designer's response to the client and the client's decision on each recommendation shall be given to the road safety audit team leader as part of the important feedback loop. The road safety audit team leader will disseminate this to team members.

18 March 2021 │ Status: Final │ Project No.: 310204673 Child No.: 100.100 │ Our ref: rpt_ruakaka_serv_ctr_RSA_final - draft designer responses.docx Page 1

1.2 The Project The project comprises a proposed service centre for fuel, restrooms, fast food, freedom camping, picnicking etc. located in the northern quadrant of the existing roundabout intersection of SH1 and SH15 1 (Port Marsden Highway) at Ruakākā about 25 km south of Whangārei. The design and traffic impact assessment has been undertaken by Traffic Planning Consultants on behalf of the developer. Two accesses are proposed—a southbound left-turn slip lane from SH1 at Prescott Road, and a raised median seagull intersection allowing all turning movements on SH15, 225 m east of the roundabout. The service centre trip generation is estimated to be about 3400 vehicles per day. The entrance to the southbound deceleration lane has been positioned just north of Prescott Road to avoid drivers turning right out of Prescott Road and then left into the service centre (a weave) across fast- moving southbound traffic approaching the roundabout.

Subject Site

Figure 1: Site location A second painted seagull intersection with a 220 m eastbound deceleration lane has previously been proposed about 720 m from the roundabout as part of a separate consented service centre development dating back to 2011. This is assumed to be for information only as it is not part of this project. 1.3 The Road Safety Audit Team This road safety audit has been carried out in accordance with the NZTA Road Safety Audit Procedure for Projects Guidelines – Interim release May 2013, by: • Keith Weale, Stantec, Auckland, and

• Mike Sullivan, Engineering Equilibrium, Whangarei. 1.4 Previous Road Safety Audits The road safety audit team is not aware of any previous road safety audits that have been undertaken for this project.

1 The supplied drawings and report indicate SH15A throughout, which is incorrect. This road safety audit report therefore refers to the Port Marsden Highway as SH15. 18 March 2021 │ Status: Final │ Project No.: 310204673 Child No.: 100.100 │ Our ref: rpt_ruakaka_serv_ctr_RSA_final - draft designer responses.docx Page 2

1.5 Scope of this Road Safety Audit This is a preliminary design road safety audit of the project described in Section 1.2. Although the internal circulation of vehicular and pedestrian traffic has been considered in general, the focus of this road safety audit has been on the safety of the proposed accesses to SH1 and SH15. The proposed painted seagull intersection including a deceleration lane as part of a 2011 consented development further to the east of this project is not included in this road safety audit. However, any changes to the proposed Ruakākā Service Centre seagull should take into consideration any potential safety issues on the consented design and vice versa. 1.6 Briefing and Exit Meeting No formal briefing or exit meeting was held with the designers. The road safety audit team relied on the supplied drawings and traffic impact assessment report listed in Section 1.9. 1.7 Safety Audit and Site Visit The road safety auditors visited the site of this audit on Wednesday 9 December 2020. The road safety audit team carried out a desk top safety audit via a Teams meeting during COVID-19 Level 3 lockdown on Monday 1 March 2021. The safety auditors also examined the revisions to the drawings supplied on 8 March individually. The amendments related to the removal of the eastbound deceleration lane from the proposed seagull intersection. 1.8 Report Format The potential road safety problems identified have been ranked as follows. The expected crash frequency is qualitatively assessed on the basis of expected exposure (how many road users will be exposed to a safety issue) and the likelihood of a crash resulting from the presence of the issue. The severity of a crash outcome is qualitatively assessed on the basis of factors such as expected speeds, type of collision, and type of vehicle involved. Reference to historic crash rates or other research for similar elements of projects, or projects as a whole, have been drawn on where appropriate to assist in understanding the likely crash types, frequency and likely severity that may result from a particular concern. The frequency and severity ratings are used together to develop a combined qualitative risk ranking for each safety issue using the concern assessment rating matrix in Table 1-1. The qualitative assessment requires professional judgement and a wide range of experience in projects of all sizes and locations.

Table 1-1: Concern Assessment Rating Matrix

Severity Frequency (probability of a crash) (likelihood of death or serious injury) Frequent Common Occasional Infrequent

Very likely Serious Serious Significant Moderate

Likely Serious Significant Moderate Moderate

Unlikely Significant Moderate Minor Minor

Very unlikely Moderate Minor Minor Minor

While all safety concerns should be considered for action, the client or nominated project manager will make the decision as to what course of action will be adopted based on the guidance given in this ranking process with consideration to factors other than safety alone. As a guide a suggested action for each concern category is given in Table 1-2.

18 March 2021 │ Status: Final │ Project No.: 310204673 Child No.: 100.100 │ Our ref: rpt_ruakaka_serv_ctr_RSA_final - draft designer responses.docx Page 3

Table 1-2: Concern Categories Concern Suggested action Major safety concern that must be addressed and requires changes to avoid Serious serious safety consequences. Significant safety concern that should be addressed and requires changes to Significant avoid serious safety consequences. Moderate Moderate safety concern that should be addressed to improve safety. Minor Minor safety concern that should be addressed where practical to improve safety.

In addition to the ranked safety issues, it is appropriate for the safety audit team to provide additional comments with respect to items that may have a safety implication but lie outside the scope of the safety audit. A comment may include items where the safety implications are not yet clear due to insufficient detail for the stage of project, items outside the scope of the audit such as existing issues not impacted by the project or an opportunity for improved safety but not necessarily linked to the project itself. While typically comments do not require a specific recommendation, in some instances suggestions may be given by the auditors. 1.9 Documents Provided Traffic Planning Consultants provided the road safety audit team with the following documents on 8 March 2021 specifically for this audit. 17101 – G – (7) Overall Plan SH1 4 February 2021 17101 – G – (8) Overall Plan SH1 4 February 2021 17101 – G – (9) Dimension Plan SH1 4 February 2021 17101 – G – (10) Dimension Plan SH1 4 February 2021 17101 – G2 – (12) Overall Plan SH15 5 February 2021 17101 – G2 – (13) Overall Plan SH15 3 February 2021 17101 – G2 – (14) Overall Plan SH15 3 February 2021 17101 – G2 – (15) Overall Plan SH15 3 February 2021 17101 – G2 – (16) Overall Plan SH15 5 February 2021 17101 – G2 – (17) Vehicle Tracking SH15 3 February 2021 17101 – G2 – (18) Vehicle Tracking SH15 3 February 2021 Ruakākā Service Centre 2581 State Highway 1 Traffic Impact Assessment February 2021 In addition, the following drawings were supplied on 30 November 2021. These internal service centre plans are deemed to be for information only. 17101 – L – (1) Overall Plan Service Centre 24 September 2020 17101 – L – (2 - 21) Vehicle tracking Service Centre 24 September 2020

1.10 Disclaimer The findings and recommendations in this report are based on an examination of available relevant plans, the specified road and its environs, and the opinions of the road safety audit team. However, it must be recognised that eliminating safety concerns cannot be guaranteed since no road can be regarded as absolutely safe and no warranty is implied that all safety issues have been identified in this report. Safety audits do not constitute a design review nor are they an assessment of standards with respect to engineering or planning documents. Readers are urged to seek specific technical advice on matters raised and not rely solely on the report.

18 March 2021 │ Status: Final │ Project No.: 310204673 Child No.: 100.100 │ Our ref: rpt_ruakaka_serv_ctr_RSA_final - draft designer responses.docx Page 4

While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the report, it is made available on the basis that anyone relying on it does so at their own risk without any liability to the safety audit team or their organisations.

18 March 2021 │ Status: Final │ Project No.: 310204673 Child No.: 100.100 │ Our ref: rpt_ruakaka_serv_ctr_RSA_final - draft designer responses.docx Page 5

2 Safety Concerns 2.1 SH1 Access

2.1.1 Southbound left-turn deceleration slip lane Comment A southbound left-turn deceleration lane from SH1 at Prescott Road is proposed as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Proposed high-speed left -turn deceleration lane The high-speed southbound left-turn deceleration slip lane would have been a safety concern were it not for the proposed raised table speed calming measure at the threshold of the internal road layout and forecourt arrowed in Figure 3. This is an essential safety measure and must not be omitted.2 Furthermore, the slope and height of the raised table must be enough to limit speeds to about 30 km/h regardless of tour bus and heavy vehicle comfort requirements.

Figure 3: Proposed raised table intersection at service centre threshold

2 The road safety audit team assumes that the arrowed section in Figure 3 is indeed a raised table. If it is not, then it should be. 18 March 2021 │ Status: Final │ Project No.: 310204673 Child No.: 100.100 │ Our ref: rpt_ruakaka_serv_ctr_RSA_final - draft designer responses.docx Page 6

Designer The arrowed section in Figure 3 is indeed a proposed raised table and will not be response omitted. Safety Engineer Insert comment comment Client decision Insert comment

Action taken Insert comment

2.2 Service Centre Internal Layout

2.2.1 Pedestrian zebra crossings and speed control Moderate

A layout of islands and walkways within the greater car parking area is proposed as shown in Figure 4, however only one appears to be shown as a raised table crossing. Since the car park is large, speeds can creep up. The distance from the entrance threshold at the northern end of the service centre to the fuel pumps is 170 m and from the eastern end it is realistically about 140 m after the sharp left turn. It would be safer to place all zebra crossings on raised tables in case someone e.g. a child runs across a zebra crossing unseen from behind a car. This would also save having to install speed humps as is so often the case in such service centres as shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6. The access from the east (SH 15) has little speed control other than its two ninety degree curves, but the carriageway width is up to 11 m wide for a two-lane road.

Figure 4: Pedestrian crossings in car park

18 March 2021 │ Status: Final │ Project No.: 310204673 Child No.: 100.100 │ Our ref: rpt_ruakaka_serv_ctr_RSA_final - draft designer responses.docx Page 7

Figure 5: Typical retrofitted speed hump on entrance (Google, 2009)

Figure 6: Typical retrofitted speed hump on internal road layout in service centre (Google, 2009)

Recommendation(s) 1. Place all zebra crossings on raised tables to protect the zebra crossing and to reduce speed in the service centre generally. 2. Add entrance threshold speed control to the eastern entrance possibly near the fuel kiosk.

Frequency Severity Rating Crashes are likely to be Death or serious injury is The safety concern is infrequent likely moderate Designer Agree with Road Safety Auditors - all zebra crossings should be on raised tables and response physical speed control should be added to the eastern entrance possibly near the fuel kiosk. These can be required as consent conditions. Safety Engineer Insert comment comment

18 March 2021 │ Status: Final │ Project No.: 310204673 Child No.: 100.100 │ Our ref: rpt_ruakaka_serv_ctr_RSA_final - draft designer responses.docx Page 8

Client decision Insert comment

Action taken Insert comment

2.3 SH15 Access

2.3.1 Seagull intersection form Serious

A raised median seagull layout has been proposed for the access off SH15. The traffic impact assessment report suggests that the position has been chosen due to prescribed spacings (about 200 ) between the intersection and the roundabout. This has placed the intersection on the inside of a reasonably sharp horizontal curve where the sight distance, particularly to the east, is limited.

Figure 7: Proposed seagull intersection While the reasoning for spacing requirements between normal T-intersections is reasonable, the same reasoning may not necessarily apply to roundabouts where everyone has to slow down to negotiate the intersection i.e. there is no highspeed through traffic passing through both intersections. The designers have compensated for the reduced sight distance to the east by proposing a seagull layout so that drivers turning right out of the service centre do not have to give way to through traffic approaching from the east—only a lower volume of traffic turning right into the service centre. Unfortunately, a Waka Kotahi study a few years ago found that, at best, seagull intersections are only as safe as a normal T-intersection. Poorly designed seagull intersections, those with only painted markings and with short deceleration and acceleration lengths, were significantly less safe. The main safety issue is that drivers entering the main road from the minor road have difficulty in determining whether they need to give way to the left or not. They do need to give way to slower vehicles turning right, but not to faster vehicles heading straight through. This is counter intuitive. Also, drivers generally cannot see, from their low observation angle, what lane the approaching vehicle is in and whether it is going to turn right. Not everyone signals well in advance. Raised medians do help in this regard, but the right-turn bay needs to be long enough so that straight through drivers cannot suddenly change their minds and decide to turn right. This sudden change of mind is a distinct possibility as they will not be able to see the service centre until they reach the intersection. In this respect the proposed seagull intersection is particularly bad as the start of the right-turn bay is only about 60 m from the entrance, and it is this aspect that has ranked the safety concern with a common frequency coupled with a T-bone crash that has resulted in a serious safety concern. With all this indecision going on, drivers forget to recheck that there is no one approaching from their right, or they start to cross and then hesitate or stop as they suddenly realise they have to give way to a right- turning vehicle and they get T-boned—one of the worst safety outcomes, especially as the approaching driver from their right is completely taken by surprise and has no time to react to the vehicle pulling out in front and therefore crashes at high speed.

18 March 2021 │ Status: Final │ Project No.: 310204673 Child No.: 100.100 │ Our ref: rpt_ruakaka_serv_ctr_RSA_final - draft designer responses.docx Page 9

Recommendation(s) 1. If a seagull intersection is to be constructed, then ensure that the kerbed right-turn bay is considerably (hundreds of metres) longer than proposed so that there is no chance of sudden last-minute decision to turn right into the service centre, and so that drivers exiting the service centre have a clear view of which vehicle is in which lane. Note the residential property access requirements discussed in Section 2.4.1 and note any the potential effects on the consented seagull intersection to the east. 2. Improve the sight distance to the east by shifting the intersection to another position so that drivers exiting the service centre have a clear view of which vehicle is in which lane. 3. Preferably, consider a safer alternative left-in and left-out access arrangement as discussed in Section 2.3.3.

Frequency Severity Rating Crashes are likely to be Death or serious injury is The safety concern is common very likely serious Designer We have prepared three alternatives for consideration by NZTA – the first is a slight response moving forward of the SH15A site egress to provide 200 metres safe intersection sight distance to the east, and replacing the seagull layout with a standard right turn bay. The second is a variation on this, providing a right turn out from the site and a central median island to prohibit right turns into the site from SH15A (westbound motorists on SH15A can go around the roundabout and turn left into the site). The third option is to physically prohibit right turns at the SH15A access with a solid central median island and provide a left turn site egress onto SH1. Safety Engineer Insert comment comment Client decision Insert comment

Action taken Insert comment

2.3.2 Downstream weave Moderate

The proposed seagull intersection places all traffic exiting the service centre in the right-only lane (presumably this will be marked straight ahead as well) and all traffic from Marsden Point in the left-only lane. The distance between the end of the acceleration lane and the start of the solid lane line at the roundabout bout is only 100 m. This is far too short to be able to find a gap and change lanes, especially for visitors and tourists whom the service centre is intended to serve, and the weave would take place in a right-hand curve. There are likely to be lane changing crashes. The traffic impact report discussed the reasoning for the proposed arrangement based on eliminating the need to merge then diverge before the roundabout, but it is doubtful whether the proposed solution improves the identified merge issue. Instead, it swaps a merge issues for a weave issue, which is potentially more confusing and requires more time to execute. If the seagull intersection is definitely to be constructed, a mitigating measure might be to provide a double right turn to Whangārei considering the future four-lane widening of SH1. This may partially eliminate some of the weave, but the roundabout would have to be redesigned to eliminate any double right turn conflicts at the exits to the roundabout. Safe pedestrian crossing would also have to be considered across two lanes. Refer to Section 2.5.1.

18 March 2021 │ Status: Final │ Project No.: 310204673 Child No.: 100.100 │ Our ref: rpt_ruakaka_serv_ctr_RSA_final - draft designer responses.docx Page 10

Figure 8: Downstream weave from seagull intersection to roundabout

Recommendation(s) 1. Preferably do not construct a seagull intersection arrangement. 2. If the seagull intersection does need to be constructed, then consider a double right turn or a double left turn depending on the dominant movements and consider also that the merge from right to left is more difficult to undertake than from left to right.

Frequency Severity Rating Crashes are likely to be Death or serious injury is The safety concern is common unlikely moderate Designer We have prepared three alternatives for consideration by NZTA – the first is a slight response moving forward of the SH15A site egress to provide 200 metres safe intersection sight distance to the east, and replacing the seagull layout with a standard right turn bay. The second is a variation on this, providing a right turn out from the site and a central median island to prohibit right turns into the site from SH15A (westbound motorists on SH15A can go around the roundabout and turn left into the site). The third option is to physically prohibit right turns at the SH15A access and provide a left turn site egress onto SH1. All options omit the need for a downstream weave. Safety Engineer Insert comment comment Client decision Insert comment

Action taken Insert comment

2.3.3 Alternative left-in and left-out arrangement Comment Bearing in mind that traditionally prescribed intersection spacings may not necessarily apply to roundabouts or to left-in and left out arrangements, the designers could consider a left-in and left-out access on both SH1 and SH15 instead of the proposed southbound slip lane on SH1 and seagull intersection on SH15. The roundabout would provide a safe turnaround facility for all returning right-turn movements. The stated weave reason for the left-turn deceleration lane starting north of Prescott Road would fall away once Prescott Road becomes left-in and left-out when SH1 is widened to four lanes, or even earlier if incorporated into the short-term SH1 safety improvements. There would need to be good wayfinding signposting within the service area so that drivers chose the correct exit. The internal road and parking layout would also have to be amended to suit.

18 March 2021 │ Status: Final │ Project No.: 310204673 Child No.: 100.100 │ Our ref: rpt_ruakaka_serv_ctr_RSA_final - draft designer responses.docx Page 11

Designer We have prepared three alternatives for consideration by NZTA – the first is a slight response moving forward of the SH15A site egress to provide 200 metres safe intersection sight distance to the east, and replacing the seagull layout with a standard right turn bay. The second is a variation on this, providing a right turn out from the site and a central median island to prohibit right turns into the site from SH15A. (Westbound motorists on SH15A can go around the roundabout and turn left into the site). The third option is to physically prohibit right turns at the SH15A access and provide a left turn site egress onto SH1. Safety Engineer Insert comment comment Client decision Insert comment

Action taken Insert comment

2.3.4 Fifth roundabout leg Comment The road safety audit team is not sure if a fifth roundabout to serve as the only access to the service centre was considered. Roundabouts are the safest form of intersection, but due consideration would need to be given to approach signage. Considering that the widening of SH1 to four lanes at some stage in the future is envisaged, there may be opportunity to incorporate a fifth leg along with the reconstruction of the roundabout to accommodate the future four SH1 lanes. 2.4 Property Access 2.4.1 Incorporation into service centre access The traffic impact assessment report states that the property access shown in Figure 9 would be closed and incorporated into the service centre access. Presumably, this arrangement would apply only the western property closest to the seagull intersection, which would be blocked by the raised median shown in light blue. There would be no safety concern with that arrangement, but the road safety audit team is doubtful that such a right-of-way, which would be shared with a public access, could actually be achieved: or it is just wishful thinking? If the proposed access cannot be made to work in law, then the designers will have to rethink the seagull intersection as the residents would not be able to turn around the end of the raised medians safely. If the seagull intersection is constructed and the median island is extended as recommended in Section 2.3.1, then the same left-in and left-out issue would apply to the residential property to the east, which is assumed is not intended to be accesses via the service centre.

18 March 2021 │ Status: Final │ Project No.: 310204673 Child No.: 100.100 │ Our ref: rpt_ruakaka_serv_ctr_RSA_final - draft designer responses.docx Page 12

Figure 9: Property accesses off SH15

Designer We confirm that it is only the western property that will have its SH15A access response blocked and instead share the service centre access. The proposed layout is shown below:

We do not understand the safety auditors’ concern. Both the service centre and the adjacent property are private property, and it is a routine matter to provide shared right of way between two adjacent private properties. Safety Engineer Insert comment comment

18 March 2021 │ Status: Final │ Project No.: 310204673 Child No.: 100.100 │ Our ref: rpt_ruakaka_serv_ctr_RSA_final - draft designer responses.docx Page 13

Client decision Insert comment

Action taken Insert comment

2.5 Pedestrians

2.5.1 Pedestrians crossing between service centres Moderate

It is likely that there will be some demand for pedestrians to cross between the G.A.S. service centre and the retailers at the proposed Ruakākā service centre, for example for lunch. The existing roundabout has wide paved median islands for refuge and footpaths all around the perimeter. There are dropped kerb crossings across SH1 and SH15, but they are narrow, almost invisible, and too far from the roundabout. It is possible that the original designers placed the dropped kerbs to coincide with lighting columns for good reason, but approach speeds will be higher than at the roundabout and the existing positions will probably not coincide with the new pedestrian crossing desire lines between the two service centres. Figure 8 shows a two-lane approach to the roundabout on SH15. This is likely to be on the desire line for pedestrians, who would probably cross two lanes of traffic in preference to following the longer route around the western side of the roundabout.

Figure 10: Missing connection G.A.S. forecourt and footpath to Ruakākā service centre (Google, 2009)

Recommendation(s) 1. When connecting the proposed Ruakākā service centre footpaths to the existing footpaths, ensure that they follow pedestrian desire lines and that they direct pedestrians to the safest points to cross the roundabout, generally about two vehicle lengths back from the perimeter of the roundabout and where the median refuges are wider. 2. Provide additional dropped crossings to coincide with the desire lines, as necessary. 3. Provide a short path through the flower bed to connect the G.A.S. forecourt with the existing footpath as suggested in Figure 10. 4. Ensure that the pedestrian crossing points are adequately lit and supplemented with pedestrian level lighting as required. 5. Avoid routing pedestrians to cross two-lane approaches.

18 March 2021 │ Status: Final │ Project No.: 310204673 Child No.: 100.100 │ Our ref: rpt_ruakaka_serv_ctr_RSA_final - draft designer responses.docx Page 14

Frequency Severity Rating Crashes are likely to be Death or serious injury is The safety concern is infrequent likely moderate Designer There is no existing demand for pedestrians in this rural area, and no need for response footpaths. It is our understanding that the formed strips behind the kerb on the roundabout approaches are off-road cycle lanes, not footpaths. Providing footpaths connecting to the proposed service centre and pedestrian crossing points as suggested by the Road Safety Auditors may have unintended safety consequences, viz. that such facilities encourage passing motorists who would otherwise drive into the site to park on the State Highway shoulder opposite the service centre instead and use the footpaths and crossing points to cross the highway to the service centre and back again. It is our proposal that a fence be constructed along the Service Centre site boundary between the two site access points, meaning that a person would need to walk 500 metres or more through the site and along the highway to get from the proposed Ruakaka Service Centre to the existing GAS service station. Given the few people that would wish to travel between the two sites, and the potential adverse safety consequences, it would be most appropriate for anyone going from one site to the other to do so in a vehicle rather than walking. Safety Engineer Insert comment comment Client decision Insert comment

Action taken Insert comment

2.6 Lighting

2.6.1 Extent of lighting Comment The existing roundabout and its approaches are lit, but the existing lighting along SH1 and SH15 would not extend as far as the proposed new accesses. Ensure that the existing lighting is extended to include Prescott Road and the proposed seagull intersection site. Ensure that pedestrian paths are adequately lit.

Designer All proposed site intersections and traffic islands will be adequately lit as per response standard specifications. Safety Engineer Insert comment comment Client decision Insert comment

Action taken Insert comment

18 March 2021 │ Status: Final │ Project No.: 310204673 Child No.: 100.100 │ Our ref: rpt_ruakaka_serv_ctr_RSA_final - draft designer responses.docx Page 15

3 Audit Statement We declare that we remain independent of the design team and have not been influenced in any way by any party during this road safety audit. We certify that we have used the available plans, and have examined the specified roads and their environment, to identify features of the project we have been asked to look at that could be changed, removed, or modified in order to improve safety. We have noted the safety concerns that have been evident in this audit and have made recommendations that may be used to assist in improving safety.

Signed Date 18 March 2021

Keith Weale, BSc(Eng), BEng(Hons), MSc, CMEngNZ, CPEng Principal Transportation Engineer, Stantec, Auckland

Signed Date 18 March 2021

Mike Sullivan, BE (Civil), CMEngNZ Director, Engineering Equilibrium, Whangarei

18 March 2021 │ Status: Final │ Project No.: 310204673 Child No.: 100.100 │ Our ref: rpt_ruakaka_serv_ctr_RSA_final - draft designer responses.docx Page 16

4 Response and Decision Statements System designers and the people who use the roads must all share responsibility for creating a road system where crash forces do not result in death or serious injury. 4.1 Designer’s Responses I have studied and considered the auditors’ safety concerns and recommendations for safety improvements set out in this road safety audit report and I have responded accordingly to each safety concern with the most appropriate and practical solutions and actions, which are to be considered further by the safety engineer (if applicable) and project manager.

Signed Date 7 May 2021

Anatole Sergejew, Senior Associate, Traffic Planning Consultants Ltd 4.2 Safety Engineer’s Comments (if applicable) I have studied and considered the auditors’ safety concerns and recommendations for safety improvements set out in this road safety audit report together with the designer’s responses. Where appropriate, I have added comments to be taken into consideration by the project manager when deciding on the action to be taken.

Signed Date

[Safety Engineer’s name, qualification, position, company] 4.3 Project Manager’s Decisions I have studied and considered the auditors’ safety concerns and recommendations for safety improvements set out in this road safety audit report, together with the designer’s responses and the comments of the safety engineer (if applicable) and having been guided by the auditor’s ranking of concerns have decided the most appropriate and practical action to be taken to address each of the safety concerns.

Signed Date

[Project Manager’s name, qualification, position, company] 4.4 Designer’s Statement I certify that the project manager’s decisions and directions for action to be taken to improve safety for each of the safety concerns have been carried out.

Signed Date

[Designer’s name, qualification, position, company]

18 March 2021 │ Status: Final │ Project No.: 310204673 Child No.: 100.100 │ Our ref: rpt_ruakaka_serv_ctr_RSA_final - draft designer responses.docx Page 17

4.5 Safety Audit Close Out The project manager is to distribute the audit report incorporating the decisions to the designer, safety audit team leader, safety engineer, and project file. Date:……………………………….

18 March 2021 │ Status: Final │ Project No.: 310204673 Child No.: 100.100 │ Our ref: rpt_ruakaka_serv_ctr_RSA_final - draft designer responses.docx Page 18

5 References

Google. (2009, December). Street View.

18 March 2021 │ Status: Final │ Project No.: 310204673 Child No.: 100.100 │ Our ref: rpt_ruakaka_serv_ctr_RSA_final - draft designer responses.docx Page 19

Auckland Level 3 Stantec House, 111 Carlton Gore Road Newmarket, Auckland 1023 PO Box 13-052, Armagh Christchurch 8141 Tel +64 9 580 4500

Please visit www.stantec.com to learn more about how Stantec design with community in mind.