DOCSLIB.ORG

Waveney District Council Water Cycle Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Waveney District Council Water Cycle Study Waveney District Council FINAL – June 2017 Waveney District Council Water Cycle Study Waveney District Council Project Reference: 60518518 Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Hannah Booth Carl Pelling Sarah Kelly Graduate Water Consultant Associate Director Regional Director Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position Initial Draft – V1 March 2017 For comment Carl Pelling Associate Director Final June 2017 Final Sarah Kelly Regional Director Prepared for: Waveney District Council Prepared by: AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited Midpoint Alencon Link Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PP UK T: +44(0)1256 310200 aecom.com Prepared for: Waveney District Council AECOM Waveney District Council Water Cycle Study Waveney District Council Project Reference: 60518518 Limitations AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of Waveney District Council (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed (“final part C Waveney WCS_Final”). No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by AECOM. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others and upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate. Information obtained by AECOM has not been independently verified by AECOM, unless otherwise stated in the Report. The methodology adopted and the sources of information used by AECOM in providing its services are outlined in this Report. The work described in this Report was undertaken between September 2016 and June 2017 and is based on the conditions encountered and the information available during the said period of time. The scope of this Report and the services are accordingly factually limited by these circumstances. Where assessments of works or costs identified in this Report are made, such assessments are based upon the information available at the time and where appropriate are subject to further investigations or information which may become available. AECOM disclaim any undertaking or obligation to advise any person of any change in any matter affecting the Report, which may come or be brought to AECOM’s attention after the date of the Report. Certain statements made in the Report that are not historical facts may constitute estimates, projections or other forward-looking statements and even though they are based on reasonable assumptions as of the date of the Report, such forward-looking statements by their nature involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results predicted. AECOM specifically does not guarantee or warrant any estimate or projections contained in this Report. Copyright © 2017 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. All Rights Reserved. Prepared for: Waveney District Council AECOM Waveney District Council Water Cycle Study Waveney District Council Project Reference: 60518518 Table of Contents List of Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 Non-Technical Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Wastewater Strategy .................................................................................................................................... 2 Water Supply Strategy ................................................................................................................................. 3 Overall Impact of Development .................................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 4 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 WCS History ..................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Study Governance ............................................................................................................................ 4 1.4 WCS Scope ...................................................................................................................................... 4 1.5 Key Assumptions and Conditions ..................................................................................................... 5 1.6 Report Structure ............................................................................................................................... 6 2. Study Drivers ............................................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 OFWAT Price Review ....................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Water Framework Directive .............................................................................................................. 9 3. Proposed Growth ....................................................................................................................................... 10 3.1 Preferred Growth Strategy .............................................................................................................. 10 3.2 Housing .......................................................................................................................................... 10 3.3 Employment .................................................................................................................................... 12 4. Wastewater Treatment Strategy ................................................................................................................. 13 4.1 Wastewater in the District ............................................................................................................... 13 4.2 Management of WRC Discharges .................................................................................................. 14 4.3 Wastewater Treatment Assessment Overview ................................................................................ 16 4.4 WRC Headroom Assessment ......................................................................................................... 18 4.5 Water Quality Assessment .............................................................................................................. 20 4.6 Ecological Appraisal........................................................................................................................ 28 4.7 Wastewater Summary .................................................................................................................... 36 5. Water Supply Strategy ............................................................................................................................... 38 5.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 38 5.2 Abstraction Licensing Strategies .................................................................................................... 38 5.3 Water Resource Planning ............................................................................................................... 40 5.4 Water Resource Planning in the District ......................................................................................... 40 5.5 Water Efficiency Plan ...................................................................................................................... 41 5.6 Water Neutrality .............................................................................................................................. 42 6. Major Development Site Assessment ........................................................................................................ 51 6.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 51 6.2 Site Assessment Methodologies ..................................................................................................... 51 7. Water Cycle Strategy Recommendations and Policy ................................................................................. 54 7.1 Recommendations for Policy Development .................................................................................... 54 7.2 Further Recommendations ............................................................................................................. 55 Appendix A Policy and Legislative Drivers Shaping the WCS ............................................................................... 56 Appendix B Relevant Planning Documents to the WCS ....................................................................................... 58 Appendix C WRC Capacity Assessment results ................................................................................................... 59 C.1 Modelling assumptions
Recommended publications
  • Annex 7: Completed Workbook Trial for New Anglia

    Annex 7: Completed Workbook Trial for New Anglia

    Annex 7: Completed workbook trial for New Anglia RPA | Annexes Local Economic Development and the Environment (LEDE) workbook Local Economic Development and the Environment (LEDE) project researcher workbook April 2013 1 Local Economic Development and the Environment (LEDE) workbook Organizational details Name of LEP: New Anglia Lead responsible officer for LEP Name: Role: Address: Telephone number: Mobile telephone number: E-mail address: Researcher Name: Risk & Policy Analysts Ltd. Organization: Risk & Policy Analysts Ltd. Role: Address: Farthing Green House, 1 Beccles Rd, Loddon, Norfolk, NR14 6LT Telephone number: 01508 528465 Mobile telephone number: E-mail address: [email protected] 2 Local Economic Development and the Environment (LEDE) workbook Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................................. 3 1. One page initial summary ............................................................................................................... 7 1.1. The geographical area of the LEP ............................................................................................ 7 1.2. Description of the economy of the area ................................................................................. 7 1.3. Challenges faced by the economy .......................................................................................... 8 1.4. The plausible future development pathway ..........................................................................
  • Fen Management Strategy - Explains the Role of the Strategy and Its Relationship to Other Documents

    Fen Management Strategy - Explains the Role of the Strategy and Its Relationship to Other Documents

    CONTENTS Acknowledgements Purpose & use of the fen management strategy - explains the role of the strategy and its relationship to other documents Summary - outlines the need for a fen management strategy Introduction - Sets the picture of development and use of fens from their origins to present day Approach to producing strategy - Methodology to writing the fen management strategy Species requirements: This section provides a summary of our existing knowledge concerning birds, plants, mammals and invertebrates associated with the Broads fens. This information forms a basis for the fen management strategy. Vegetation resource Mammals Birds Invertebrates Summary of special features for each valley: This section mainly identifies the botanical features within each valley. The distribution of birds, mammals and invertebrates is either variable or unknown, and so has been covered only in a general sense in the section on species requirements. However, where there is obvious bird interest concentrated within particular valleys, this has been identified. The botanical section provides a summary analysis of the fen vegetation resource survey and considers the relative importance of fen vegetation in a local and national context. A summary of the chemical variables of the soils for each valley has also been included. Ant valley Bure valley Muckfleet valley Thurne valley Waveney valley Yare valley The fen resource for the future: Identifies aims and objectives to restore fens to favourable nature conservation state Environmental constraints and opportunities - Using the fen management strategy: - During the fen vegetation resource survey, chemical variables of the substratum associated with various plant communities were measured. The purpose of these measurements was to provide some indication of the importance of substrate to the plant communities.
  • The Lake Lothing (Lowestoft) Third Crossing Order 201[*]

    The Lake Lothing (Lowestoft) Third Crossing Order 201[*]

    Lake Lothing Third Crossing Chapter 11 of the Environmental Statement R2 - Clean SCC/LLTC/EX/70 The Lake Lothing (Lowestoft) Third Crossing Order 201[*] _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ Document SCC/LLTC/EX/70: Chapter 11 of the Environmental Statement R2 – Clean ________________________________________________________________________ Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 PINS Reference Number: TR010023 Author: Suffolk County Council Document Reference: SCC/LLTC/EX/70 Date: 29 January 2019 Lake Lothing Third Crossing Chapter 11 of the Environmental Statement R2 - Clean SCC/LLTC/EX/70 This page is intentionally left blank Lake Lothing Third Crossing Chapter 11 of the Environmental Statement - tracked Document Reference: SCC/LLTCEX/27 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11 Nature Conservation Scope of the Assessments Introduction This updated chapter 11 of the Environmental Statement describes the assessment of the likely significant effects of the Scheme on biodiversity and nature conservation during the construction and operational. It is supported by Figures 11.1 to 11.7 (APP-150) and Appendices 11A to 11G (APP-183 to APP- 189). The assessment of this topic area considers potential impacts relating to the following aspects: • Statutory and non-statutory designated sites; • Important or protected habitats; and • Legally protected species and/or species of conservation importance. The assessment has incorporated the comments of the Secretary of State (SoS) presented in the Scoping Opinion included in Appendix 6B, as well as those received during the S42 consultation. The assessment should be read in conjunction with Chapter 8: Air Quality; Chapter 12: Geology and Soils, Chapter 13: Noise and Vibration, Chapter 17: Road Drainage and the Water Environment and Chapter 19: Traffic and Transport.
  • Impersonal Style and the Form of Experience in W. G. Sebald's the Rings of Saturn

    Impersonal Style and the Form of Experience in W. G. Sebald's the Rings of Saturn

    Please do not remove this page Impersonal Style and the Form of Experience in W. G. Sebald's The Rings of Saturn Persson, Torleif https://scholarship.libraries.rutgers.edu/discovery/delivery/01RUT_INST:ResearchRepository/12643388260004646?l#13643534940004646 Persson, T. (2016). Impersonal Style and the Form of Experience in W. G. Sebald’s The Rings of Saturn. Studies in the Novel, 48(2), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.7282/T3B56MZ6 This work is protected by copyright. You are free to use this resource, with proper attribution, for research and educational purposes. Other uses, such as reproduction or publication, may require the permission of the copyright holder. Downloaded On 2021/09/27 14:06:53 -0400 Studies in the Novel ISSN 0039-3827 205 Vol. 48 No. 2 (Summer), 2016 Pages 205–222 IMPERSONAL STYLE AND THE FORM OF EXPERIENCE IN W. G. SEBALD’S THE RINGS OF SATURN TORLEIF PERSSON The prose fiction of W. G. Sebald exhibits a curious flatness. The source of this defining quality is what the narrator of The Emigrants calls the “wrongful trespass” of empathetic or emotional identification with the victims of historical calamity (29). The resulting narrative distance is a familiar hallmark of Sebald’s style, realized in his writing through an almost seamless intermingling of fact, fiction, allusion, and recall—a “literary monism”—that fuses different narrative temporalities, superimposes the global on the local, and assimilates a wide range of source materials and intertextual content (McCulloh 22). Two broad responses might be discerned in respect to this particular aspect of Sebald’s writing. The first questions the ethical commitment of a style that is unable to make any kind of moral distinction.
  • Hannah Booth Report Greater Norwich Water Cycle Study 2020-01-23

    Hannah Booth Report Greater Norwich Water Cycle Study 2020-01-23

    Greater Norwich Water Cycle Study Greater Norwich Authorities Draft for consultation Project number: 60593120 February 2020 Greater Norwich Water Cycle Study Draft for consultation Greater Norwich Authorities AECOM Quality information Prepared by Checked by Verified by Approved by Hannah Booth Amy Ruocco Carl Pelling Amy Ruocco Graduate Water Senior Water Consultant Regional Director Senior Water Consultant Consultant Laura Soothill Graduate Engineer Christina Bakopoulou Flood Risk Engineer Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position 01 27/11/2019 Draft for comment CP Carl Pelling Regional Director 02 28/01/2020 Draft for CP Carl Pelling Regional Director consultation 03 05/02/2020 Draft for CP Carl Pelling Regional Director consultation Position statement February 2020 This report represents a working draft of the GNLP Outline Water Cycle Study. Consultation is ongoing with Anglian Water Services, the Environment Agency and Natural England who have not yet signed off the study conclusions and it is therefore subject to change. Further updates are also required to align with some recent changes to housing numbers and extension of the plan period to 2038 agreed in December 2019. These will be incorporated into the final report. Prepared for: Broadland District Council, Norwich City Council and South Norfolk District Council Prepared by: AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited Midpoint, Alencon Link Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PP United Kingdom T: +44(0)1256 310200 aecom.com © 2020 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client.
  • Characterisation and Prediction of Large-Scale, Long-Term Change of Coastal Geomorphological Behaviours: Final Science Report

    Characterisation and Prediction of Large-Scale, Long-Term Change of Coastal Geomorphological Behaviours: Final Science Report

    Characterisation and prediction of large-scale, long-term change of coastal geomorphological behaviours: Final science report Science Report: SC060074/SR1 Product code: SCHO0809BQVL-E-P The Environment Agency is the leading public body protecting and improving the environment in England and Wales. It’s our job to make sure that air, land and water are looked after by everyone in today’s society, so that tomorrow’s generations inherit a cleaner, healthier world. Our work includes tackling flooding and pollution incidents, reducing industry’s impacts on the environment, cleaning up rivers, coastal waters and contaminated land, and improving wildlife habitats. This report is the result of research commissioned by the Environment Agency’s Science Department and funded by the joint Environment Agency/Defra Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Research and Development Programme. Published by: Author(s): Environment Agency, Rio House, Waterside Drive, Richard Whitehouse, Peter Balson, Noel Beech, Alan Aztec West, Almondsbury, Bristol, BS32 4UD Brampton, Simon Blott, Helene Burningham, Nick Tel: 01454 624400 Fax: 01454 624409 Cooper, Jon French, Gregor Guthrie, Susan Hanson, www.environment-agency.gov.uk Robert Nicholls, Stephen Pearson, Kenneth Pye, Kate Rossington, James Sutherland, Mike Walkden ISBN: 978-1-84911-090-7 Dissemination Status: © Environment Agency – August 2009 Publicly available Released to all regions All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. Keywords: Coastal geomorphology, processes, systems, The views and statements expressed in this report are management, consultation those of the author alone. The views or statements expressed in this publication do not necessarily Research Contractor: represent the views of the Environment Agency and the HR Wallingford Ltd, Howbery Park, Wallingford, Oxon, Environment Agency cannot accept any responsibility for OX10 8BA, 01491 835381 such views or statements.
  • Lound with Ashby, Herringfleet and Somerleyton Neighbourhood Plan

    Lound with Ashby, Herringfleet and Somerleyton Neighbourhood Plan

    Lound with Ashby, Herringfleet and Somerleyton Neighbourhood Plan 2014 to 2036 Submission Version July 2021 Lound with Ashby, Herringfleet and Somerleyton Neighbourhood Plan Index 1. Introduction page 2 2. Map of Neighbourhood Plan Area page 3 3. Profile of the Parishes page 4 4. Our Vision for 2036 page 6 5. Objectives of Neighbourhood Plan page 6 6. Policies included in this Neighbourhood Plan page 8 7. Housing page 8 8. Environment page 17 9. Community Facilities page 21 10. Business and Employment page 27 11. Health page 28 Appendix 1 Lound and Somerleyton, Suffolk, Masterplanning and Design Guidelines, AECOM, June 2019 1 Lound with Ashby, Herringfleet and Somerleyton Neighbourhood Plan 1. Introduction 1.1 Lound and Ashby, Herringfleet & Somerleyton are adjoining parishes in the north of Suffolk. The area is rural, with much of the land being used for agriculture. The main settlement areas are the villages of Somerleyton and Lound, with smaller settlements at Herringfleet and Ashby, together with some scattered farmhouses and converted farm buildings or farm workers’ cottages. The two parishes have a combined area of around 2020 hectares, and a total population of around 780 (2011 census). 1.2 Early in 2016 the two parish councils agreed to work together to develop a joint neighbourhood plan. A steering group consisting of residents and Parish Councillors was set up to lead the work. 1.3 One of the initial pieces of work was to agree and gain acceptance from the former Waveney District Council (now East Suffolk Council) and the Broads Authority for the designated Neighbourhood Area.
  • Fen Management Strategy - Explains the Role of the Strategy and Its Relationship to Other Documents

    Fen Management Strategy - Explains the Role of the Strategy and Its Relationship to Other Documents

    CONTENTS Acknowledgements Purpose & use of the fen management strategy - explains the role of the strategy and its relationship to other documents Summary - outlines the need for a fen management strategy Introduction - Sets the picture of development and use of fens from their origins to present day Approach to producing strategy - Methodology to writing the fen management strategy Species requirements: This section provides a summary of our existing knowledge concerning birds, plants, mammals and invertebrates associated with the Broads fens. This information forms a basis for the fen management strategy. Vegetation resource Mammals Birds Invertebrates Summary of special features for each valley: This section mainly identifies the botanical features within each valley. The distribution of birds, mammals and invertebrates is either variable or unknown, and so has been covered only in a general sense in the section on species requirements. However, where there is obvious bird interest concentrated within particular valleys, this has been identified. The botanical section provides a summary analysis of the fen vegetation resource survey and considers the relative importance of fen vegetation in a local and national context. A summary of the chemical variables of the soils for each valley has also been included. Ant valley Bure valley Muckfleet valley Thurne valley Waveney valley Yare valley The fen resource for the future: Identifies aims and objectives to restore fens to favourable nature conservation state Environmental constraints and opportunities - Using the fen management strategy: - During the fen vegetation resource survey, chemical variables of the substratum associated with various plant communities were measured. The purpose of these measurements was to provide some indication of the importance of substrate to the plant communities.
  • Upper Thurne Broads and Marshes

    Upper Thurne Broads and Marshes

    Norfolk Team 60 Bracondale NORWICH NR1 2BE Tel: +44 (0)1603 598400 Fax: +44 (0)1603 762552 Email: [email protected] cSAC: The Broads SPA: Broadland Component SSSI: Upper Thurne Broads and Marshes Conservation objectives for the European Interest on the SSSI The conservation objectives for the European interest on the SSSI are: to maintain*, in favourable condition, the: Alluvial forests with Alnus glutinosa and Fraxinus excelsior. Calcareous fens with Cladium mariscus and species of the Carex davallianae. Natural eutrophic lakes with Magnopotamion or Hydrocharition-type vegetation. Transition mires and quaking bogs. Hard oligo-mesotrophic waters with benthic vegetation of Chara spp.. Molinia meadows on calcareous, peaty or clayey-silt-laden soils (Molinion caeruleae). to maintain*, in favourable condition, the habitats for the population of: Otter (Lutra lutra). to maintain*, in favourable condition, the habitats for the populations of Annex1 bird species+ of European importance with particular reference to: open water swamp fen reedbed lowland wet grassland with ditches and water bodies. +Bittern, Marsh harrier, Hen harrier, Bewick’s swan, Whooper swan and Ruff. to maintain*, in favourable condition, the habitats for the populations of migratory bird species+ of European importance with particular reference to: open water swamp fen reedbed lowland wet grassland with ditches and water bodies. +Pink-footed goose, Gadwall and Shoveler. to maintain*, in favourable condition, the habitats of the populations of waterfowl that contribute to the wintering waterfowl assemblage of European importance, with particular reference to: open water swamp and fen lowland wet grassland with ditches and water bodies. * maintenance implies restoration if the feature is not currently in favourable condition.
  • Pakefield to Easton Bavents County: Suffolk District

    Pakefield to Easton Bavents County: Suffolk District

    Site Name: Pakefield to Easton Bavents County: Suffolk District: Waveney District Council Status: Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) notified under Section 28 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 substituted by Schedule 9 to the Countryside & Rights of Way Act 2000. Local Planning Authority: Waveney District Council National Grid reference: TM 521828 Area: 735.33ha Ordnance Survey Sheet: 156 1:10,000: TM57 NW, TM 58NW, TM 58 SW Previous Notification Date: 7 September Notification Date: 8 December (under 1981 Act) 1989 2005 Reasons for Notification: Pakefield to Easton Bavents is nationally important for the geological exposures of the Lower Pleistocene Norwich Crag Formations and associated Pleistocene vertebrate assemblages, and the coastal geomorphology of Benacre Ness. The site is also nationally important for its vegetated shingle features, saline lagoons, flood-plain fens, an assemblage of nationally rare and nationally scarce vascular plants, scarce breeding birds, four breeding bird assemblages in four different habitats and wintering bitterns Botaurus stellaris. General description: Geology The two low cliffs between Easton Broad and Southwold provide excellent exposures of the three major elements of the Norwich Crag Formation; the Crag itself (Chillesford Church Member), the Baventian Clay (Easton Bavents Member) and the Westleton Beds (Westleton Member). This is the type locality for the Baventian Cold Stage. The stratigraphical relationship of the Antian to the Bramertonian stage and of the Baventian to the Pre-Pastonian
  • Fieldwalking at Covehithe, Suffolk, January 2015

    Fieldwalking at Covehithe, Suffolk, January 2015

    Fieldwalking at Covehithe, Suffolk, January 2015 Carenza Lewis and Catherine Ranson 2 Fieldwalking at Covehithe, Suffolk, January 2015 Carenza Lewis and Catherine Ranson Access Cambridge Archaeology McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research University of Cambridge Downing Street Cambridge CB2 3ER 01223 761518 [email protected] http://www.access.arch.cam.ac.uk/ Front cover image: Field walkers at the western end of the field (copyright ACA) 3 4 Contents LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................ 6 LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................. 7 1 SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... 8 2 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 TOUCHING THE TIDE PROJECT ................................................................................................. 9 2.2 ACCESS CAMBRIDGE ARCHAEOLOGY ...................................................................................... 9 3 AIMS, OBJECTIVES AND DESIRED OUTCOMES ............................................................. 10 3.1 AIMS ...................................................................................................................................... 10 3.2 OBJECTIVES
  • Tank Training Site, Fritton Lake Somerleyton, Ashby & Herringfleet HER Ref. SOL

    Tank Training Site, Fritton Lake Somerleyton, Ashby & Herringfleet HER Ref. SOL

    Tank Training Site, Fritton Lake Somerleyton, Ashby & Herringfleet HER ref. SOL 029 Archaeological Survey Report SCCAS Report No. 2013/052 Client: Suffolk County Council Author: Mark Sommers April 2013 © Suffolk County Council Archaeological Service Tank Training Site, Fritton Lake Somerleyton, Ashby & Herringfleet HER ref. SOL 029 Archaeological Survey Report SCCAS Report No. 2013/022 Author: Mark Sommers Contributions By: Stuart Burgess Report Date: April 2013 HER Information Site Code: SOL 029 Site Name: World War 2 Tank Training Site, Fritton Lake Report Number 2013/052 Planning Application No: n/a Date of Fieldwork: 25th - 28th April 2013 Grid Reference: TM 4803 9977 Oasis Reference: suffolkc1-148843 Curatorial Officer: Sarah Poppy Project Officer: Mark Sommers Client/Funding Body: funded by the European Interreg IV Project Client Reference: n/a Digital report submitted to Archaeological Data Service: http://ads.ahds.ac.uk/catalogue/library/greylit Disclaimer Any opinions expressed in this report about the need for further archaeological work are those of the Field Projects Team alone. Ultimately the need for further work will be determined by the Local Planning Authority and its Archaeological Advisors when a planning application is registered. Suffolk County Council’s archaeological contracting services cannot accept responsibility for inconvenience caused to the clients should the Planning Authority take a different view to that expressed in the report. Prepared By: Mark Sommers Date: April 2013 Approved By: Dr Rhodri Gardner Position: Contracts Manager Date: April 2013 Signed: Contents Summary 1. Introduction 1 2. Location 3 3. Historic Background 3 4. Methodology 3 5. Survey Results 4 1. Military camp 5 2.