1 Introduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 Introduction Appropriate Assessment for Ipswich Borough Council Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies 1 September 2009 Quality control Appropriate Assessment for Ipswich Borough Council Core Strategy and Policies Checked by Project Manager: Approved by: Signature: Signature: Name: Nicholas Sibbett Name: Jo Parmenter Title: Senior Ecologist Title: Associate Director Date: 1st September 2009 Date: 1st September 2009 The Landscape Partnership is registered with the Landscape Institute, the Royal Town Planning Institute, and is a member of the Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment The Landscape Partnership Registered office Greenwood House 15a St Cuthberts Street Bedford MK40 3JB Registered in England No. 2709001 Contents Part 1: Text Summary 1 Introduction...................................................................................................................................1 1.1 The plan being assessed...........................................................................................................1 1.2 Appropriate Assessment requirement.........................................................................................1 1.3 Appropriate Assessment process ...............................................................................................2 1.4 European sites.........................................................................................................................2 2 European sites potentially affected...................................................................................................4 2.1 Sites within the Core Strategy and Policies area..........................................................................4 2.2 Sites outside the Core Strategy and Policies area ........................................................................4 2.3 Other relevant plans or projects affecting these sites ..................................................................6 3 Likely significant effects ..................................................................................................................7 3.1 Process ...................................................................................................................................7 3.2 Results....................................................................................................................................7 4 Policies to be assessed....................................................................................................................8 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................8 4.2 Policy CS7. The amount of housing required..............................................................................8 4.3 Policy CS9. Previously developed land target .............................................................................8 4.4 Policy CS 10. Ipswich Northern Fringe ......................................................................................9 4.5 Policy CS 13. Planning for jobs growth......................................................................................9 4.6 Policy CS16. Green infrastructure, sport and recreation ..............................................................9 4.7 Policy CS18. Strategic flood defence .......................................................................................10 4.8 Policy CS20. East-west transport capacity ...............................................................................10 4.9 Policy DC4. Development and flood risk ..................................................................................10 4.10 Policy DC15. Travel demand management ..............................................................................10 4.11 Policy DC32 Conserving local natural and geological interest......................................................11 4.12 Other policies ........................................................................................................................11 5 Methods of assessing European site visitor increases from an increased human population.................12 5.1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................12 5.2 Existing condition assessments of European sites .....................................................................12 5.3 Visitor surveys to predict additional visitors to European sites across the Suffolk Coast and Heaths AONB. 13 5.4 Impact on specific sites ..........................................................................................................19 5.5 Survey of site managers opinion of impacts of additional visitors................................................19 6 Assessment of each policy.............................................................................................................22 6.1 Introduction to the assessment of each policy ..........................................................................22 6.2 Policy CS7, The amount of housing required, Policy CS9, Previously developed land target, and Policy CS10 Ipswich Northern Fringe. ................................................................................................22 6.3 Policy CS 13. Planning for jobs growth....................................................................................29 6.4 Policy CS16. Green infrastructure, sport and recreation ............................................................30 6.5 Policy CS18. Strategic Flood Defence ......................................................................................32 6.6 Policy CS20. East-west transport capacity. ..............................................................................34 6.7 Policy DC4. Development and flood risk ..................................................................................35 Policy DC4: Development and flood risk.............................................................................................35 6.8 Policy DC15. Travel demand management ..............................................................................36 6.9 Policy DC32 Conserving Local Natural and Geological Interest....................................................38 7 Mitigation measures......................................................................................................................39 7.1 Introduction to mitigation .......................................................................................................39 7.2 Mitigation for Policy CS 7, The amount of housing required, CS9, Previously developed land target and CS10 Ipswich northern fringe .....................................................................................................39 7.3 Mitigation conclusions ............................................................................................................42 8 Conclusions of the Appropriate Assessment ....................................................................................44 8.1 Policy CS7 / CS9 / CS10..........................................................................................................44 8.2 Individually assessed policies ..................................................................................................44 8.3 All other policies ....................................................................................................................44 8.4 Interactions between policies in this plan .................................................................................44 8.5 In combination with plans from others.....................................................................................44 8.6 Final conclusion .....................................................................................................................44 9 Limitations to the assessment........................................................................................................45 9.1 The evidence base .................................................................................................................45 9.2 Further work needed..............................................................................................................45 Part 2: Figures 1 European sites in the study area 2 Ipswich Policy Area Part 3: Appendices 1 European site citations 2 Conservation Objectives for SSSI components of European sites 3 Condition Assessments for SSSI components of European sites 4 Natural England correspondence regarding ‘Likely Significant Effect’. 5 Sample site managers’ survey results 6 Key Diagram from preferred options report 7 Nitrogen deposition on Orwell estuary saltmarsh 8 Predicted decline in NOx in Ipswich, 2001 – 2010 9 Bird counts for Stour and Orwell Estuaries SPA 2002/3 to 2006/7 10 Bird counts for count sector 6 (Bridge Wood) of Stour and Orwell Estuaries SPA 2002/3 to 2006/7 Addendum Summary This document is the Appropriate Assessment of Ipswich Borough Council’s Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies dated July 2009, as required by the Conservation (Natural Habitats &c.) Regulations 1994 as amended by the Conservation (Natural Habitats &c.) (Amendment) Regulations 2007. These regulations are often abbreviated to, simply, the ‘Habitats Regulations’. The Appropriate Assessment specifically looks at the implications of the Core Strategy and Policies for nature conservation sites with a European nature conservation designation,
Recommended publications
  • Fen Management Strategy - Explains the Role of the Strategy and Its Relationship to Other Documents
    CONTENTS Acknowledgements Purpose & use of the fen management strategy - explains the role of the strategy and its relationship to other documents Summary - outlines the need for a fen management strategy Introduction - Sets the picture of development and use of fens from their origins to present day Approach to producing strategy - Methodology to writing the fen management strategy Species requirements: This section provides a summary of our existing knowledge concerning birds, plants, mammals and invertebrates associated with the Broads fens. This information forms a basis for the fen management strategy. Vegetation resource Mammals Birds Invertebrates Summary of special features for each valley: This section mainly identifies the botanical features within each valley. The distribution of birds, mammals and invertebrates is either variable or unknown, and so has been covered only in a general sense in the section on species requirements. However, where there is obvious bird interest concentrated within particular valleys, this has been identified. The botanical section provides a summary analysis of the fen vegetation resource survey and considers the relative importance of fen vegetation in a local and national context. A summary of the chemical variables of the soils for each valley has also been included. Ant valley Bure valley Muckfleet valley Thurne valley Waveney valley Yare valley The fen resource for the future: Identifies aims and objectives to restore fens to favourable nature conservation state Environmental constraints and opportunities - Using the fen management strategy: - During the fen vegetation resource survey, chemical variables of the substratum associated with various plant communities were measured. The purpose of these measurements was to provide some indication of the importance of substrate to the plant communities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lake Lothing (Lowestoft) Third Crossing Order 201[*]
    Lake Lothing Third Crossing Chapter 11 of the Environmental Statement R2 - Clean SCC/LLTC/EX/70 The Lake Lothing (Lowestoft) Third Crossing Order 201[*] _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ Document SCC/LLTC/EX/70: Chapter 11 of the Environmental Statement R2 – Clean ________________________________________________________________________ Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 PINS Reference Number: TR010023 Author: Suffolk County Council Document Reference: SCC/LLTC/EX/70 Date: 29 January 2019 Lake Lothing Third Crossing Chapter 11 of the Environmental Statement R2 - Clean SCC/LLTC/EX/70 This page is intentionally left blank Lake Lothing Third Crossing Chapter 11 of the Environmental Statement - tracked Document Reference: SCC/LLTCEX/27 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11 Nature Conservation Scope of the Assessments Introduction This updated chapter 11 of the Environmental Statement describes the assessment of the likely significant effects of the Scheme on biodiversity and nature conservation during the construction and operational. It is supported by Figures 11.1 to 11.7 (APP-150) and Appendices 11A to 11G (APP-183 to APP- 189). The assessment of this topic area considers potential impacts relating to the following aspects: • Statutory and non-statutory designated sites; • Important or protected habitats; and • Legally protected species and/or species of conservation importance. The assessment has incorporated the comments of the Secretary of State (SoS) presented in the Scoping Opinion included in Appendix 6B, as well as those received during the S42 consultation. The assessment should be read in conjunction with Chapter 8: Air Quality; Chapter 12: Geology and Soils, Chapter 13: Noise and Vibration, Chapter 17: Road Drainage and the Water Environment and Chapter 19: Traffic and Transport.
    [Show full text]
  • Blything Hundred Assessment for the First Payment
    Blything Hundred assessment for the first payment (to be rated by 20 May 1642) of a grant under An Act for the raising and leavying of Moneys for the necessary defence and great affaires of the Kingdomes of England and Ireland and for the payment of debts undertaken by the Parliament (16 Charles I chapter 32) This index comprises: images of the original parchment roll (E1/25) from SRO Bury St Edmunds; Vincent B. Redstone's transcript (HD11/1 : 4921/10.14) photographed at SRO Ipswich; Redstone's 1904 book, The Ship-Money Returns for the County of Suffolk, 1639-40 (Harl. MSS. 7,540–7,542), which lacks about half the parishes of Blything Hundred. Original roll Vincent B. Redstone's transcript Ship Money Sums due from county of Suffolk 18r c [0 verso] (facing folio 1 recto) & hundred of Blything VBR's notes re rents & Acts [0 verso] (facing folio 1 recto) Aldringham cum Thorpe 10r a 25 74 Benacre 08r a 18v - Blyford 10r a 26 85 Blythburgh 15r a 40v 75 Blythford - See Blyford Bramfield 12v a 33 78 Brampton 04r a 8v - Bulcamp [hamlet in Blythburgh] 15v a 41 (Blythburgh) 76 Buxlow - See Knodishall Chediston 06r a 14 76 Cookley 11r a 27v - Covehithe or North Hales 17r a 46 (Norhales al(ia)s Covehithe) - Cratfield 13r a 34v 79 Darsham 17r a 45 83 Dunwich 08v a 20v - Easton Bavents 04v a 10v - Frostenden 07v b Omitted by VBR - Halesworth 09r a 21v 81 Henham [hamlet in Wangford] 05v a 12v 75 Henstead 06v b 16v - Heveningham 01v a 2v 85 Holton [St Peter] 06r a 14v - Huntingfield 10v a 26v 78 Knodishall & Buxlow 16r a 43 73 Leiston & Sizewell 11v a 29v - Linstead Magna 16r b 43v 79 Linstead Parva 16v a 44 77 1 Blything Hundred assessment for the first payment (to be rated by 20 May 1642) of a grant under An Act for the raising and leavying of Moneys for the necessary defence and great affaires of the Kingdomes of England and Ireland and for the payment of debts undertaken by the Parliament (16 Charles I chapter 32) Original roll Vincent B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Green | Ashbocking | IP6 9JZ Guide Price: £425,000
    White House | The Green | Ashbocking | IP6 9JZ Guide Price: £425,000 Specialist marketing for | Barns | Cottages | Period Properties | Executive Homes | Town Houses | Village Homes To find out more or arrange a viewing please contact 01449 722003 or visit www.townandvillageproperties.co.uk White House, The Green, Ashbocking, Suffolk, IP6 9JZ “A recently refurbished four bedroom detached cottage bordering onto fields at the rear.” Description White House has been lovingly restored and refurbished over the last couple of years by its present owner. The property offers spacious light and airy accommodation comprising: L-shaped entrance hall, dining room, living room, kitchen, cloakroom, conservatory, landing, four bedrooms, en- suite to master bedroom and family bathroom. The property benefits from oil central heating, tastefully presented décor, cottage kitchen, modern bathroom suites, useful conservatory/garden room and some beautiful views to the front and rear elevation over the surrounding fields. Outside there is a driveway providing parking with gardens laid to lawn to the front and side. To the rear is a patio garden which backs onto fields. About the Area Ashbocking is a popular village approximately seven miles from Ipswich offering amenities including church, garden nursery, motor vehicle repair services and ‘Swiss Farm’ butchers. The larger village of Witnesham is approximately two miles distant offering a primary school, church and public houses as well as the Fynn Valley Golf Course. Otley is approximately two miles away with post office, primary school, award winning general stores and Doctors surgery. The thriving town of Ipswich is set on the estuary of the River Orwell and has undergone an extensive gentrification programme in recent years, mainly around the waterfront and has become a popular “commutable” town to London.
    [Show full text]
  • Halesworth Area History Notes
    Halesworth Area History Notes I. HALESWORTH IN THE 11 th CENTURY Modern Halesworth was founded during the Middle Saxon period (650AD=850AD), and probably situated on the side of a ridge of sand and gravel close to the Town River. The evidence we have of early Halesworth includes a row of large post-holes, a burial of possibly a male of middle age radio-carbon dated to 740AD, and a sub-circular pit containing sheep, pig and ox bones. The ox bones show evidence of butchery. Sherds of ‘Ipswich Ware’ pottery found near the post-holes suggest trading links with the large industrial and mercantile settlement of Ipswich. It is now thought likely that ‘Ipswich Ware’ did not find its way to North Suffolk until after about 720AD. Perhaps Halesworth was also a dependent settlement of the Royal Estate at Blythburgh. By the 11 th century the settlement had moved to the top of the ridge east of the church. It’s possible that ‘Halesuworda’ had become a strategic crossing place where the Town River and its marshy flood plain, were narrow enough to be crossed. Perhaps Halesworth was also a tax centre for the payment of geld, as well as a collecting point for produce from the surrounding countryside with craft goods, agricultural produce and food rents moving up and down the river between Halesworth, Blythburgh and the coastal port of Dunwich. At the time of the Norman Conquest ‘Halesuworda’ consisted of a rural estate held by Aelfric, and two smaller manors whose freemen were under the patronage of Ralph the Constable and Edric of Laxfield.
    [Show full text]
  • East Suffolk Catchment Flood Management Plan Summary Report December 2009 Managing Flood Risk We Are the Environment Agency
    East Suffolk Catchment Flood Management Plan Summary Report December 2009 managing flood risk We are the Environment Agency. It’s our job to look after your environment and make it a better place – for you, and for future generations. Your environment is the air you breathe, the water you drink and the ground you walk on. Working with business, Government and society as a whole, we are making your environment cleaner and healthier. The Environment Agency. Out there, making your environment a better place. Published by: Environment Agency Kingfisher House Goldhay Way, Orton Goldhay Peterborough PE2 5ZR Tel: 08708 506 506 Email: [email protected] www.environment-agency.gov.uk © Environment Agency All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. December 2009 Introduction I am pleased to introduce our summary of the East Suffolk Catchment Flood Management Plan (CFMP). This CFMP gives an overview of the flood risk in the East Suffolk catchment and sets out our preferred plan for sustainable flood risk management over the next 50 to 100 years. The East Suffolk CFMP is one of 77 CFMPs for England Tidal flooding can occur within rivers and estuaries. and Wales. Through the CFMPs, we have assessed inland There is a significant risk of tidal flooding in East Suffolk flood risk across all of England and Wales for the first because the coastal land and land around the estuaries is time. The CFMP considers all types of inland flooding, low-lying. Tidal flooding can occur from the River Gipping from rivers, ground water, surface water and tidal in the ports, docklands and some areas of Ipswich.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT East Suffolk Authority Monitoring Report 2019/20
    East Suffolk Authority Monitoring Report 2018/19 | 1 DRAFT East Suffolk Authority Monitoring Report 2019/20 Covering the Suffolk Coastal Local Plan area and the Waveney Local Plan area An update on progress of the Local Plans, delivery of policies and proposals and other monitoring information for East Suffolk Published December 2020 East Suffolk Authority Monitoring Report 2019/20 | 2 Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 1 2 Content and structure of the report......................................................... 3 3 Progress of Local Plan against Local Development Scheme milestones ... 6 Suffolk Coastal Local Plan ........................................................................................................... 6 Waveney Local Plan ................................................................................................................... 6 4 Neighbourhood Plans / Neighbourhood Development Orders ................ 7 5 Community Infrastructure Levy ................................................................ 9 6 Duty to Cooperate ................................................................................. 11 7 Implementation, performance and delivery of the Suffolk Coastal and Waveney Local Plans .............................................................................. 16 Appeal decisions ....................................................................................................................... 16 Local Plan policies
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Council Landscape Guidance August 2015
    Joint Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Council Landscape Guidance August 2015 Joint Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Council Landscape Guidance 2015 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The landscape of Babergh and Mid Suffolk (South and North Suffolk) is acknowledged as being attractive and an important part of why people choose to live and work here. However current pressures for development in the countryside, and the changing agricultural and recreational practices and pressures, are resulting in changes that in some instances have been damaging to the local character and distinctiveness of the landscape. 1.1.1 Some development is necessary within the countryside, in order to promote a sustainable prosperous and vibrant rural economy. However, such development would be counterproductive if it were to harm the quality of the countryside/landscape it is set within and therefore the quality of life benefits, in terms of health and wellbeing that come from a rural landscape in good condition.1 1.1.2 The Council takes the view that there is a need to safeguard the character of both districts countryside by ensuring new development integrates positively with the existing character. Therefore, a Landscape Guidance has been produced to outline the main elements of the existing character and to outline broad principles that all development in the countryside will be required to follow. 1.1.3 Well designed and appropriately located development in the countryside can capture the benefits of sustainable economic development whilst still retaining and enhancing valuable landscape characteristics, which are so important to Babergh and Mid Suffolk. 1.1.4 The protection and enhancement of both districts landscape is essential not only for the intrinsic aesthetic and historic value that supports tourism and the economy for the area but also to maintain the quality of life for the communities that live in the countryside.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwold to Walberswick Flood and Coast Board
    Southwold to Walberswick Flood and Coast Board Minutes of meeting 22nd February 2021 10am-12pm Attendees: DB Cllr David Beavan (Chair) East Suffolk Council DR Cllr David Ritchie East Suffolk Council ML Cllr Michael Ladd Suffolk County Council SB Sharon Bleese Coastal Partnership East PP Paul Patterson Coastal Partnership East MF Madeline Fallon Coastal Partnership East PM Paul Mackie Coastal Partnership East AS Alysha Stockman Coastal Partnership East MJ Mark Johnson Environment Agency GW Gary Watson Environment Agency MH Matt Hullis Suffolk County Council GM Graeme Mateer Suffolk County Council JB Josie Bassinette Walberswick Parish Council SF Simon Flunder Southwold and Reydon Society PO Philip O’Hear Reydon Parish Council AB Adam Burrows Natural England RS Richard Steward Blyth Estuary Partnership JT Jamie Thompson SHRUBA Welcome and SB shared a round of introductions. introductions Nominations for DR requested nominations for chair of the group. DB nominated himself. SF and JB seconded. chair Clarification of SB asked the group what they would like to get out of this Board. Board aims and DB suggested a coordinated effort towards all the issues across the area and that the agencies objectives and should be brought together. geographic area JB agreed. PO asked that Easton Bavents be included. PO added the Board need to understand what is happening in the area, what is likely to happen, and get plans in place well ahead of needing them. PO raised the issue of funding and suggested landowners will need to be engaged as they have a crucial role around the estuary. ML suggested the group should pull a strategy together for this part of the coastline bearing in mind climate change and understanding how the beach and other aspects are changing over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D Natural and Built Environment Baseline
    Appendix D Natural and Built Environment Baseline Lowestoft Ness to Landguard Point SMP2 9S4195/R/PBor Final Report November 2009 Suffolk Shoreline Management Plan 2 Natural and Built Environment Baseline Suffolk Coastal District Council/Waveney District Council/Environment Agency November 2009 Final Report 9S8393 HASKONING UK LTD. ENVIRONM ENT Rightwell House Bretton Peterborough PE3 8DW United Kingdom +44 (0)1733 334455 Telephone +44 (0)1733 262 243 Fax [email protected] E-mail www.royalhaskoning.com Internet Document title Suffolk Shoreline Management Plan 2 Natural and Built Environment Baseline Status Final Report Date November 2009 Project name Suffolk SMP 2 Project number 9S4195 Reference 9S4195/CCR/RKKH/Pboro Drafted by Rosie Kelly & Kit Hawkins Checked by Kit Hawkins Date/initials check KRH 20 / 05 / 2008 Approved by Mat Cork Date/initials approval MC 20 / 05 / 2008 CONTENTS Page GLOSSARY OF TERMS VI 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Structure of Report 1 1.3 Area of Interest 2 2 OVERVIEW OF STATUTORY DESIGNATIONS 4 2.1 Introduction 4 2.1.1 Compensation – managed realignment 5 2.2 Ramsar sites 6 2.2.1 Alde-Ore Estuary 6 2.2.2 Broadland 9 2.2.3 Deben Estuary 10 2.2.4 Minsmere-Walberswick 10 2.2.5 Stour and Orwell Estuaries 11 2.3 Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) 13 2.3.1 Alde, Ore and Butley Estuaries 16 2.3.2 Benacre to Easton Lagoons 16 2.3.3 The Broads SAC 17 2.3.4 Minsmere – Walberswick Heaths and Marshes 19 2.3.5 Orfordness and Shingle Street 20 2.4 Special Protection Areas (SPAs) 21 2.4.1 Alde-Ore
    [Show full text]
  • Fen Management Strategy - Explains the Role of the Strategy and Its Relationship to Other Documents
    CONTENTS Acknowledgements Purpose & use of the fen management strategy - explains the role of the strategy and its relationship to other documents Summary - outlines the need for a fen management strategy Introduction - Sets the picture of development and use of fens from their origins to present day Approach to producing strategy - Methodology to writing the fen management strategy Species requirements: This section provides a summary of our existing knowledge concerning birds, plants, mammals and invertebrates associated with the Broads fens. This information forms a basis for the fen management strategy. Vegetation resource Mammals Birds Invertebrates Summary of special features for each valley: This section mainly identifies the botanical features within each valley. The distribution of birds, mammals and invertebrates is either variable or unknown, and so has been covered only in a general sense in the section on species requirements. However, where there is obvious bird interest concentrated within particular valleys, this has been identified. The botanical section provides a summary analysis of the fen vegetation resource survey and considers the relative importance of fen vegetation in a local and national context. A summary of the chemical variables of the soils for each valley has also been included. Ant valley Bure valley Muckfleet valley Thurne valley Waveney valley Yare valley The fen resource for the future: Identifies aims and objectives to restore fens to favourable nature conservation state Environmental constraints and opportunities - Using the fen management strategy: - During the fen vegetation resource survey, chemical variables of the substratum associated with various plant communities were measured. The purpose of these measurements was to provide some indication of the importance of substrate to the plant communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Responses to Sites
    Help plan our future: Options for the new Waveney Local Plan Responses to Sites August 2016 Help plan our future: Options for the new Waveney Local Plan Responses to Sites August 2016 1 - 19-21 Ravensmere, Beccles ....................................................................................................... 6 2 - Allotment land, Somerleyton ..................................................................................................... 6 3 - Ashfield Stables, Hall Lane, Oulton ............................................................................................ 9 4 - Blundeston Road (west end), Blundeston ................................................................................. 9 5 - Brambles Drift, Green Lane, Reydon ....................................................................................... 11 6 - Broadside Park Farm, Reydon .................................................................................................. 13 7 - Burnt Hill Lane to Marsh Lane, Carlton Colville /Lowestoft ..................................................... 15 8 - Chenery's Land (East), Cucumber Lane, Beccles / Land at Chenery's Farm, Beccles ............... 18 9 - Chenery's Land (West), Cucumber Lane, Beccles / Land at Chenery's Farm, Beccles ............. 23 13 - Fairview Farm, Norwich Road, Halesworth / Holton ............................................................. 28 14 - Field, Saxon Way, Halesworth ............................................................................................... 30 15
    [Show full text]