DOCSLIB.ORG

Acrobat Pdfmaker

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

6. Podaci o vrstama informacija PODACI O ŠUMAMA I OSTALIM DELATNOSTIMA PREDUZEĆA I- Zapremina posečenog drveta 1. Ukupno: 554.897 m³ 2. Oblo tehničko drvo: 323.232 m³ (58%) 3. Prostorno:231.665m³ (42%) II-RASADNIČKA PROIZVODNjA Površina rasadnika: 180,57 ha. Broj rasadnika: 16 Broj sadnica u proizvodnji: 900.000 Godišnja realizacija (utrošak za sadnju) sadnica: 600.000 Pošumljavanje (godišnje): 1.900,00 ha* *Napomena: Ovaj podatak se odnosi na pošumljavanje sadnjom sadnica, setvom semena i vegetativnu obnovu. III-ŠUMSKI PUTEVI Tvrdi šumski putevi: 241km.* *Napomena: Ovaj podatak ne sadrži javne i meke šumske puteve. Struktura površina JP "Vojvodinašume" A) Državne šume ha Red Period ŠUME I ŠUMSKO ZEMLjIŠTE OSTALO ZEMLjIŠTE UKUPNA . ŠUMSKO GAZDINSTVO važenja POVRŠINA Šumske Šumsko Za ostale broj POGŠ Svega Šuma Svega Neplodno kulture zemljište svrhe 1 Sremska Mitrovica 4249705 38740,06 29739,84 8369,71 630,51 3756,92 3671,30 85,69 2 Pančevo 50712,50 35461,32 20279,73 12841,42 2340,17 15251,1 6063,01 9188,17 3 Novi Sad 12842,24 11300,83 2605,51 7666,02 1029,30 1541,41 1277,62 263,79 4 Sombor 23795,38 18913,14 9883,18 7951,85 1078,11 4882,24 4376,59 514,65 SVEGA 129847,01 104415,35 62508,26 36829 5078,09 25431,7 15388,5 10052,3 B) Privatne šume ha Period ŠUME I ŠUMSKO ZEMLjIŠTE OSTALO ZEMLjIŠTE Red. UKUPNA ŠUMSKO GAZDINSTVO važenja broj POVRŠINA Šumske Šumsko Za ostale POGŠ Svega Šuma Svega Neplodno kulture zemljište svrhe 1 Sremska Mitrovica 3028,21 3028,21 2737,62 172,31 118,28 2 Pančevo 1829,96 1824,59 1530,78 293,81 5,37 5,37 3 Novi Sad 327,33 327,33 237,84 52,51 36,98 4 Sombor 187,38 187,38 138,23 49,15 SVEGA 5372,88 5367,51 4644,47 224,82 498,22 5,37 5,37 V) Ukupno: (Državne šume + Privatne šume) ha ŠUME I ŠUMSKO ZEMLjIŠTE OSTALO ZEMLjIŠTE Period Red. ŠUMSKO važenja UKUPNA Šumske Šumsko Za ostale broj GAZDINSTVO POGŠ POVRŠINA Svega Šuma kulture zemljište Svega Neplodno svrhe 1 Sremska Mitrovica 4252733 41768,3 32477,5 8542,02 748,79 3756,92 3671,3 85,69 2 Pančevo 52542,5 37285,9 21810,5 12841,4 2633,98 15256,5 6063,01 9193,54 3 Novi Sad 13169,6 11628,2 2843,35 7718,53 1066,28 1541,41 1277,62 263,79 4 Sombor 23982,8 19100,5 10021,4 7951,85 1127,26 4882,24 4376,59 514,65 SVEGA 135220 109783 67152,7 37053,8 5576,31 25437,1 15388,5 10057,7 Struktura površina po poreklu i očuvanosti JP "Vojvodinašume" (stanje po posebnim osnovama gazdovanja šumama u doba uređivanja) A) Državne šume ha UKUPNA Visoke šume Veštački obnovljene šume Izdanačke šume površina šuma Svega Očuvane Svega Očuvane Svega Očuvane Red. ŠUMSKO Razređene Degradirane Razređene Degradirane Razređene Degradirane broj GAZDINSTVO ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha 1 Sremska Mitrovica 38109,55 19627,30 9717,46 9805,56 104,28 17461,20 13409,62 4022,54 29,04 1021,05 852,99 123,79 44,27 2 Pančevo 33121,15 903,48 273,01 545,61 84,86 12883,43 6778,85 4861,18 1243,40 19334,24 8361,46 8569,38 2403,40 3 Novi Sad 10271,53 1410,65 1091,37 269,22 50,06 8038,73 6554,29 973,33 511,11 822,15 757,31 21,84 43,00 4 Sombor 17835,03 1546,41 215,68 1209,88 120,85 11602,77 6945,67 4537,52 119,58 4685,85 2792,58 1639,14 254,13 SVEGA 99337,26 23487,84 11297,52 11830,27 360,05 49986,13 33688,43 14394,57 1903,13 25863,29 12764,34 10354,15 2744,80 B) Privatne šume ha UKUPNA Visoke šume Veštački obnovljene šume Izdanačke šume Red. površina ŠUMSKO GAZDINSTVO broj šuma Svega Očuvane Razređene Degradirane Svega Očuvane Razređene Degradirane Svega Očuvane Razređene Degradirane ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha 1 Sremska Mitrovica 2909,93 620,40 620,40 172,31 172,31 2117,22 1936,85 180,37 2 Pančevo 1530,78 5,04 5,04 1525,74 1075,78 449,96 3 Novi Sad 290,35 52,48 43,21 9,27 237,87 182,06 48,39 7,42 4 Sombor 138,23 2,64 2,64 22,86 22,86 112,73 112,73 SVEGA 4869,29 628,08 628,08 247,65 238,38 9,27 3993,56 3307,42 498,35 187,79 V) Ukupno: (Državne šume + Privatne šume) ha UKUPNA Visoke šume Veštački obnovljene šume Izdanačke šume površina Svega Svega Svega Red. ŠUMSKO šuma Očuvane Razređene Degradirane Očuvane Razređene Degradirane Očuvane Razređene Degradirane broj GAZDINSTVO ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha 1 Sremska Mitrovica 41019,48 20247,70 10337,86 9805,56 104,28 17633,51 13581,93 4022,54 29,04 3138,27 2789,84 123,79 224,64 2 Pančevo 34651,93 908,52 278,05 545,61 84,86 12883,43 6778,85 4861,18 1243,40 20859,98 9437,24 9019,34 2403,40 3 Novi Sad 10561,88 1410,65 1091,37 269,22 50,06 8091,21 6597,50 982,60 511,11 1060,02 939,37 70,23 50,42 4 Sombor 17973,26 1549,05 218,32 1209,88 120,85 11625,63 6968,53 4537,52 119,58 4798,58 2905,31 1639,14 254,13 SVEGA 104206,55 24115,92 11925,60 11830,27 360,05 50233,78 33926,81 14403,84 1903,13 29856,85 16071,76 10852,50 2932,59 Stanje šuma po vrstama drveća J.P. "Vojvodinašume" (stanje po osnovama gazdovanja šumama u doba uređivanja) A) Državne šume Red. ŠUMSKO Površina broj GAZDINSTVO (ha) Svega (m3) Eat Vrba D.topola OML Lužnjak P.jasen Bagrem Cer Grab A.jasen C. orah P. Brest OTL C. bor Ost. čet. V 11949537,8 975686,6 55838,9 81547,3 102610,6 6213901 2259806 103053,1 459594,6 806519,9 17568 33348,8 352787,2 4,8 Zv 231104,8 Srem. 60375,1 2307,8 7152,4 2480,7 116180,5 49831 3787 10070,6 16527,5 460,9 888,3 9824,9 0,1 1 Mitrovica 41019,48 E 2019571,1 777887,4 33038,2 37972,4 11184,5 567604,8 234411,8 75000,9 48560,7 137393 10717,5 3876,1 60123,8 V 3809881,8 1235803 213228,7 43596,7 328296 50660,5 12407 357322,3 31392,3 24710,7 159993,7 399282,9 1647 423640 311876 216025 Zv 175986,4 76625 6398,2 2730,6 9753 1070 246,4 21453,8 722,7 720,6 7452,6 16533,5 65 11346 12362 8507 2 Pančevo 34651,93 E 2001697,1 1141813 98885,2 45921,6 59258 5492,2 4549,5 313878,7 3992,3 1958,2 96736,9 82078,5 518 59458 69712 17445 V 2178332,3 1161716 266205,1 73543,9 363,9 180578,5 11044 101466,7 92313,2 12665,7 214828,7 2644,3 5784,1 54397,1 781,1 Zv 130663,3 86359,3 14762,7 3020,5 2 2386,4 49,3 5277,2 479 157,5 14735,2 29,7 178,4 3213,79 12,3 3 Novi Sad 10561,88 E 1422370,6 977322 147440 31094,1 22443,3 1359,3 80196,3 1867,3 299,5 129121,9 263,8 3013,9 27912,2 37 V 2705930,0 829712 44634 229583 315906 26052 87770 63473 27886 137214 258589 80 544230 140801 Zv 94103,0 40698 934 11769 9353 533 2384 2249 533 5035 5481 5 9444 5685 4 Sombor 17973,26 E 1183771,0 613341 20384 106853 118969 3555 30421 19117 16443 53268 56007 96573 48840 V 20643681,9 4339809 586878,8 237955,4 660853,5 6756758 2309677 738150,9 645972,4 873386,6 532101,1 304638,1 7511,1 1375054 311876 357611,9 Zv 631857,5 270449,4 25520,3 8210 24004,7 128007,5 44678,7 35285,8 13518,2 17935,2 27694,3 6668,8 248,4 33828,69 12362 14204,4 Svega: 104206,55 E 6627409,8 3690460 288835 93878,6 177295,5 705880,6 234786,9 587648,5 73995,3 158592 288436,2 60655,5 3531,9 244067 69712 66322 B) Privatne šume Red. ŠUMSKO Površina Svega (m3) P. Ost. broj GAZDINSTVO (ha) Eat Vrba D.topola OML Lužnjak P.jasen Bagrem Cer Grab A.jasen C. orah OTL C. bor Brest čet. V 268670 10132 5722 18263 22276 31979 91831 79829 587 8051 1 Srem. Mitrovica 3191,00 Zv 9607 432 114 587 1190 1141 2880 2821 41 401 E 17842 2876 55 1288 588 219 1949 10777 14 76 V 30369 226 172 45 403 25251 1967 12 1628 665 2 Pančevo 1829,96 Zv 1780 19 2 1 15 1589 62 1 55 36 E 20478 108 176 46 86 18219 1074 3 765 1 V 13754,9 3919,6 3222,7 972,1 782,6 209 28 3489 913 6,5 200,4 12 3 Novi Sad 306,88 Zv 647,4 216,2 75,8 25,7 32,2 2,1 1,5 204,7 82,4 0,3 6,4 0,1 E 12494 4785 3272 1015 34 2420 796 7 165 V 4411 754 60 1796 283 37 913 478 90 4 Sombor 187,38 Zv 215 29 2 108 11 34 30 1 E V 317204,9 15031,6 9176,7 19280,1 25257,6 32471 91859 108569 624 3793 6,5 12 10357,4 767 Svega: 5515,22 Zv 12249,4 696,2 193,8 613,7 1345,2 1154,1 2881,5 4614,7 41 178,4 0,3 1 492,4 37,1 E 50814 7769 3503 2349 708 219 1949 31416 14 1870 7 3 1006 1 V) Ukupno: (Državne šume + Privatne šume) Red.
Recommended publications
  • UNDP SRB PA.Pdf

    UNDP SRB PA.Pdf

    TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I: SITUATION ANALYSIS .................................................................................................... 4 1.1. Context, global significance, environmental, institutional and policy background ........ 4 1.2 Threats and root-causes ....................................................................................................... 7 1.3 Desired long-term vision and barriers to achieving it ....................................................... 7 1.4 Stakeholder analysis ............................................................................................................. 9 1.5 Baseline analysis .................................................................................................................. 10 PART II: STRATEGY ...................................................................................................................... 13 2.1 Project Rationale and Conformity to GEF Policies and Strategic Objectives .............. 13 2.2 Country Ownership: Country Eligibility and Country Drivenness ............................... 13 2.3 Design principles and strategic considerations ................................................................ 14 2.4 Project Objective, Outcomes and Outputs/Activities ...................................................... 15 2.5 Financial modality .............................................................................................................. 22 2.6 Indicators, Risks and Assumptions ..................................................................................
  • Degradation and Protection of Wetlands in Special Nature Reserves in Vojvodina

    Degradation and Protection of Wetlands in Special Nature Reserves in Vojvodina

    Degradation and Protection of Wetlands in Special Nature Reserves in Vojvodina Degradation and Protection of Wetlands in Special Nature Reserves in Vojvodina Stojanović, Vladimir1 Introduction cal and technological accomplishments Wetlands, with their swamps, marshes leave an impression that man is independ- and water surfaces on peat land, natural ent of nature. However, natural disas- Abstract and artificial, steady and periodical, with ters, such as floods, storms, erosions, and In accordance with ecological, economic, stagnant or running water, are becoming droughts - suggest the opposite. The real- scientific and cultural importance of wet- an area of interest in the field of environ- ity is that the civilization is still quite de- lands and their ecosystems, in the last cou- mental protection. They have a key ecolog- pendant on nature and the ecosystems in ple of years there has been a much greater ical function as regulators of water regime the surrounding area. The historical de- interest in these areas and their adequate and as places of rich biodiversity. These ar- pendence of man and society in wetlands preservation. Moreover, that is because eas often unite significant economic, cul- is noticeable on the example of special na- wetlands are considered to be areas af- tural, scientific and recreational values of ture reserves in the valleys of the rivers in fected by various phenomena. As condi- their territory and that is why they have to Vojvodina. A medieval town of Bodrog, tions of natural-geographical environment be preserved. Human ecological faltering which is also mentioned as the centre of became favourable, numerous floodable and the loss of these kinds of ecosystems the whole region, was located on the terri- plains emerged in valleys of big rivers in can cause a serious damage to the environ- tory of special nature reserve “Gornje Po- Vojvodina, both in geological and the near ment (The Convention on Wetlands - bro- dunavlje”.
  • The Principles of Sustainable Development of Tourism In

    The Principles of Sustainable Development of Tourism In

    Acta geographica Slovenica, 54-2, 2014, 391–400 THE PRINCIPLES OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF TOURISM IN THE SPECIAL NATURE RESERVE »GORNJE PODUNAVLJE« AND THEIR IMPACT ON THE LOCAL COMMUNITIES Vladimir Stojanovi}, Jasmina \or|evi}, Lazar Lazi}, Igor Stamenkovi}, Vanja Dragi}evi} ] I V O N A J O T S R I M I D A L V Special Nature Reserve Gornje Podunavlje near Bezdan. Vladimir Stojanovi}, Jasmina \or|evi}, Lazar Lazi}, Igor Stamenkovi}, The principles of sustainable development of tourism … The principles of sustainable development of tourism in the special nature reserve »Gornje Podunavlje« and their impact on the local communities DOI: http: //dx.doi.org/ 10.3986/AGS54407 UDC: 913:338.48(497.113) 338.48:712(497.113) COBISS: 1.01 ABSTRACT: The development of tourism in protected areas is a particular challenge for the tourism business and the activity of nature conservation. The leading criteria for sustainable tourism in protected areas empha - size the importance of the adoption of certain principles of care, long -term planning and management that integrates nature protection and tourism. In this respect, the paper analyzes their importance in the case of Special Nature Reserve »Gornje Podunavlje« in Vojvodina. After acquiring the status of a special nature reserve, talk about the importance of this area to the tourism of Sombor and Apatin, where it is located, has increased. This trend follows the design of educational and tourist tracks, starting and running events as well as starting tourism businesses in rural households. There could be multiple benefits of this for the local communities.
  • CBD First National Report

    CBD First National Report

    FIRST NATIONAL REPORT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA TO THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY July 2010 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................... 3 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... 4 2. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Geographic Profile .......................................................................................... 5 2.2 Climate Profile ...................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Population Profile ................................................................................................. 7 2.4 Economic Profile .................................................................................................. 7 3 THE BIODIVERSITY OF SERBIA .............................................................................. 8 3.1 Overview......................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Ecosystem and Habitat Diversity .................................................................... 8 3.3 Species Diversity ............................................................................................ 9 3.4 Genetic Diversity ............................................................................................. 9 3.5 Protected Areas .............................................................................................10
  • Management Challenges in Special Nature Reserve “Gornje Podunavlje” and Preparations for Its Proclamation of Biosphere Reserve

    Management Challenges in Special Nature Reserve “Gornje Podunavlje” and Preparations for Its Proclamation of Biosphere Reserve

    ISSN 0354-8724 (hard copy) | ISSN 1820-7138 (online) Management Challenges in Special Nature Reserve “Gornje Podunavlje” and Preparations for its Proclamation of Biosphere Reserve Vladimir StojanovićA*, Stevan SavićA Received: October 2013 | Revised: December 2013 | Accepted: December 2013 Abstract Management of protected natural wetland habitats and flooded plains is a real challenge in nature pro- tection. Such areas consist mainly of mosaic ecosystems, highly sensitive to all natural changes, espe- cially to those of anthropogenic origin. Special nature reserve “Gornje Podunavlje” is one of the larg- est and most important wetland habitats in this part of Europe. The area is under protection, but for centuries it has been influenced by numerous economic activities. The institutions for nature protec- tion and protected area management face numerous challenges regarding this issue. The paper focus- es on the research of the landscape changes in “Gornje Podunavlje” and its surroundings. They have be- come a sensitive issue under the circumstances when “Gornje Podunavlje” and its broader areas have been nominated for biosphere reserve status. Key words: protected area, landscape changes, “Gornje Podunavlje”, management, biosphere reserve, Mura – Drava – Danube. Introduction ularization of protection through educational activities Since its foundation, Special nature reserve “Gornje and tourism development, which directly needs wild, Podunavlje” has been managed by Public Enterprise pristine and preserved nature. Vojvodinašume in Petrovaradin. Active measures have On the grounds of confronted opinions, it seems been prescribed for this protected area. However, the that all this area is urgently in need for the principle area has been strongly influenced by agriculture, fish- of sustainable development in exploitation of the re- ing, forestry and meliorations for centuries, leaving vis- sources and nature protection.
  • Sustainable Tourism As Development Perspective In

    Sustainable Tourism As Development Perspective In

    BULETINUL Vol. LXI Seria 1 - 8 Universităţii Petrol – Gaze din Ploieşti No. 1/2009 Ştiinţe Economice Tourist Potentiality in the Rural Areas in Vojvodina – North Serbia1 Predrag Vuković, Nataša Kljajić, Nada Mijajlović Institute of Agriculture Economics, Belgrade, Volgina 15, 11060 Belgrade, Serbia e-mail: [email protected] Abstract Since the end of the last century the mass tourism and its concept have reached culmination. General tendencies are focused on the tourist development towards new directions in the domain of particular needs. Future touristic development should be based on the various rural areas. Pollution, allienation from the natural environment, standardization are only a few concepts of ordinary life influencing a lot of people to turn back towards nature and the healthy way of living. Vojvodina is situated on the north part of Serbia, belonging to the Panonian area. Natural and geographical benefits offer good possibilities for investing and development. Vojvodina is marked with very attractive natural ambient: Fruška Gora, National Park, Kovilj- Petrovaradin boogy region, typical villages and farms, rivers like Danube, Tisa Tamiš etc. This area, also is characterized by rich antropogenesis resource marked with strong multiethnic element. All above mentioned characteristics offer great potential for further rural development and represent the possible starting point for further total development of this area. Key words: tourism, sustainable development, rural area JEL Classification: L83, O18, Q01 Introduction As in many other industries, accepting the terms, so frequent in recent future, like tourist industry, leasure industry , in tourism in the very beginning of its development phases, natural resources and their exploitation were not placed among important factors.
  • Cyclotourism and Campsites in Vojvodina

    Cyclotourism and Campsites in Vojvodina

    Tourism Organisation of FREE COPY Vojvodina CYCLOTOURISM AND CAMPSITES IN VOJVODINA www.vojvodinaonline.com SERBIA 2 Državna granica | State Border | Staatsgrenze Pokrajinska granica | Provincial Border | Provinzgrenze Granični prelaz | Border Crossing | Grenzübergang Budapest Magistralni put | Motorway | Landstraße H Tisza Auto-put | Highway | Autobahn Budapest Szeged Priključak na auto-put | A Slip Road | Autobahn anschluss Elevacija | Elevation | Elevation 7 8 P E < 100m 100-200m Subotica Palić Kanjiža Novi Kneževac O 3 R Aranca U 200-400m > 400m Budapest B Duna E Krivaja Čoka Hidrograja | Hydrography | Hydrographie B Reka | River | Fluss E-75 Senta Kanal | Canal | Kanal Kikinda Zlatica S Dunav Bačka Topola Timişoara R Jezero, ribnjak | Lake, shpond | See, teich Ada B 6 Sombor Tisa Čik I 5 Kanal DTD Mali Iđoš J Osijek RO Sedišta opština (broj stanovnika) 12 Bega A A A Nova Crnja Municipality Seat (Population) 11 Apatin M Sitz der Gemeinde (Bevölkerung) a li K a Kula n < 20 000 a Bečej l N.Bečej 20 000 - 50 000 9 Vrbas Begej 50 000 - 100 000 Č Srbobran Tisa Osijek > 100 000 Odžaci Jegrička Timiş HR Žitište Temerin Žabalj N Danube Bač Bački Petrovac K Zrenjanin Sečanj Timişoara Bačka Palanka NOVI SAD A Tisa Donau Kanal DTD Plandište Begej CYCLING ROUTES Sr.Karlovci Beočin Titel A MTB 10 niinnee main route F pla The Danube Route r u Kovačica ke š k a g o čk alternative route Šid r a Vršac aa šš MTB S Opovo rr Irig Alibunar V main route V The Tisa Route Inđija Zagreb E-70 R alternative route Ruma Del Bosut Tamiš ib la T main route Sr.Mitrovica
  • The Danube in Serbia – Ecological Status and Management Issues

    The Danube in Serbia – Ecological Status and Management Issues

    Transylv. Rev. Syst. Ecol. Res. 12, (2011), "The Wetlands Diversity" 91 THE DANUBE IN SERBIA – ECOLOGICAL STATUS AND MANAGEMENT ISSUES Ana BORISAVLJEVIC * * University of Belgrade, Faculty of Forestry, Kneza Viseslava 1, Belgrade, Serbia, CS-11030, [email protected], [email protected] KEYWORDS: flora, fauna, ecological status, bioindicators, hydromorphological alterations, management, Danube. ABSTRACT Many stretches of the river Danube have lost their ecological value in recent decades as a result of anthropogenic pressure from intensive agriculture, new infrastructure projects, more intensive navigation and the construction of hydro-power plants. The greatest alterations have happened in recent decades also in the investigation area, which is a part of the Middle Danube, from 1,433 to 845 km, and extends into Serbia. The content of this review paper is based on the analysis and use of topographical maps, data on waterline and discharges for five hydrological stations on the Danube in Serbia, analysis of the floral and faunal bioindicators, and a review of relevant literature. We describe indications of ecosystem alterations, following which we offer discussion on management issues, and make recommendations and comments. This paper synthesizes existing knowledge on the Danube in Serbia and, at the same time, warns of proposals that can become real projects that may have extreme adverse consequences for the Danube ecosystem. ZUSAMMENFASSUNG: Die Donau in Serbien ‒ ökologischer Zustand und Managementfragen. In den letzten Jahrzehnten haben viele Abschnitte der Donau unter dem Druck menschlicher Tätigkeiten durch intensive Landwirtschaft, neue Infrastrukturprojekte, intensivere Schifffahrt und den Bau von Wasserkraftwerken ihren ökologischen Wert verloren. Derartige, große Veränderungen fanden in den letzten Jahrzehnten auch in dem untersuchten Donauabschnitt statt, der sich als Teil der mittleren Donau in Serbien von Strom-Kilometer 1,433 zu 845 erstreckt.
  • Serbia for the Period 2011 – 2018

    Serbia for the Period 2011 – 2018

    MINISTRY OF ENVIRONmeNT AND SPATIAL PLANNING BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY OF THE RePUBLIC OF SeRBIA FOR THE PERIOD 2011 – 2018 Belgrade, 2011. IMPRINT Title of the publication: Biodiversity Strategy of the Republic of Serbia for the period 2011 – 2018 Publisher: Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning, Belgrade For Publisher: Oliver Dulic, MD Editors: Prof. Ivica Radovic, PhD Milena Kozomara, MA Photography: Boris Erg, Sergej Ivanov and Predrag Mirkovic Design: Coba&associates Printed on Recycled paper in “PUBLIKUM”, Belgrade February 2011 200 copies ISBN 978-86-87159-04-4 FOR EWORD “Because of the items that satisfy his fleeting greed, he destroys large plants that protect the soil everywhere, quickly leading to the infertility of the soil he inhabits and causing springs to dry up, removing animals that relied on this nature for their food and resulting in large areas of the once very fertile earth that were largely inhabited in every respect, being now barren, infertile, uninhabitable, deserted. One could say that he is destined, after making the earth uninhabitable, to destroy himself” Jean Baptiste Lamarck (Zoological Philosophy, 1809). Two centuries after Lamarck recorded these thoughts, it is as if we were only a step away from fulfilling his alarming prophecy. Today, unfortunately, it is possible to state that man’s influence over the environment has never been as intensive, extensive or far-reaching. The explosive, exponential growth of the world’s population, coupled with a rapid depletion of natural resources and incessant accumulation of various pollutants, provides a dramatic warning of the severity of the situation at the beginning of the third millennium.
  • Tourism Potential of Serbian Protected Areas Dear Reader

    Tourism Potential of Serbian Protected Areas Dear Reader

    ATLAS OF TOURISM POTENTIAL OF SERBIAN PROTECTED AREAS Dear reader, Serbia’s protected areas, the jewels of the country, contain nu- merous wonders of nature. A variety of rare, endangered animal and plant species can be observed in their natural habitat. Desi- gnating protected areas allows the provision of safe harbours for these species and ecosystems, which in many cases are unique. And promoting nature-respecting tourism and recreation in the- se areas not only allows visitors to explore these wonders, but also contributes to the livelihood of the people and communities who have lived in and shaped those landscapes over centuries. It is UNDP’s ambition, together with the authorities and people of Serbia, to support tourism and recreation in protected areas, so that you can explore their treasures. Hiking, bird watching, sport fishing, camping, but also adventurous activities, such as mountain biking, canyoning, paragliding or rafting, offer multiple opportunities for spending high quality time outdoors. Tourism infrastructure – like visitor centres, educational signalization, ob- servation towers and walking trails – are currently being built in all the protected areas to facilitate and guide visitors in exploring the nature, while enhancing the understanding and willingness to protect their unique character and inherent, rare species. I hope this “Atlas of Tourism Potential of Serbian Protected Are- as” will inspire you, guide you to remote corners of Serbia, and wake your curiosity to explore some of the most beautiful sides of this country. I would like to use the opportunity express my gratitude to the protected area managers for their valuable con- tribution in preparing it.
  • Protected Area Benefit Assessment Tool (PA-BAT) in Serbia CONTENTS

    Protected Area Benefit Assessment Tool (PA-BAT) in Serbia CONTENTS

    REPORT ADRIA 2017 Protected Area Benefit Assessment Tool (PA-BAT) in Serbia CONTENTS 4 Published by WHO WE ARE WWF Adria, Zelinska 2 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia and 6 World Organization for Nature, INTRODUCTION Belgrade Authors METHODOLOGY 7 Goran Sekulić, Kasandra-Zorica Ivanić, Special nature reserve Gornje Podunavlje © Szilard Kovacs Andrea Štefan RESULTS 9 Proofreading Biljana Cukavac ECONOMIC VALUES OF SERBIAN PAs 14 Front page photo National Park Đerdap © Ruben Šmit FORESTRY 16 Design Ivan Antunović TOURISM 20 Print Unit Graphics, Novi Sad 24 WATER Contact [email protected] WILD FOOD PLANTS, MUSHROOMS AND HONEY 27 [email protected] Printed on eco-friendly paper December, 2017 EDUCATION 31 FLOW OF ECONOMIC VALUES 34 CIP - Каталогизација у публикацији - Народна MAIN POTENTIALS FOR PAs IN SERBIA 36 библиотека Србије, Београд 351.853(497.11-1.75) 330.15(497.11-1.75) PARTICIPATION IN PA MANAGEMENT 38 502.2(497.11-1.75) SEKULIĆ, Goran, 1976- Protected Area Benefit Assessment Tool (PA-BAT) CHALLENGES 41 in Serbia / [Goran Sekulić, Kasandra-Zorica Ivanić, Andrea Štefan]. - Belgrade : World Organization for Nature ; Zagreb : WWF Adria, 2018 (Novi Sad : Unit RECOMMENDATIONS FOR USE OF THE PA-BAT RESULTS 43 Graphics). - 50 str. : ilustr. ; 21 cm “WWF Report Adria 2017” --> kor. - Podaci o autorima preuzeti iz kolofona. - Tiraž 150. - Kor. nasl. - RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ADDRESSING IDENTIFIED 45 Napomene i bibliografske reference uz tekst. ISBN 978-86-80646-01-5 CHALLENGES 1. Ivanić, Kasandra-Zorica, 1986- [аутор] 2. Štefan, Andrea, 1975- [аутор] a) Природна добра - Управљање - Србија b) Природна добра - Вредновање - Србија CONCLUSION 48 COBISS.SR-ID 259259660 Who we are WWF is one of the world’s leading non-governmental and non-pro- fit organizations for nature conservation.
  • CBD Fifth National Report

    CBD Fifth National Report

    CONTENT ABBREVIATIONS 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 1. BIODIVERSITY IN SERBIA – STATUS, TRENDS AND THREATS; SIGNIFICANCE OF BIODIVERSITY FOR HUMAN WELL-BEING 14 1.1. Abiotic and biotic factors of biodiversity in Serbia 14 1.2. Diversity of ecosystems in Serbia 15 1.3. Threats and pressures exerted on biodiversity in sensitive ecosystems 18 1.3.1. Pressures on biodiversity - examples 22 1.4. Protected areas 28 1.4.1. National protected areas 29 1.4.2. Areas of international importance for the conservation of biodiversity 34 1.5. Protected species 36 1.5.1. Diversity of macromycetes in Serbia 41 1.6. Overview of studies and data on ecosystem services in Serbia 43 1.7. Natural resource systems and well-being of people in Serbia 48 1.7.1. Agricultural land in Serbia 49 1.7.2. Allocation of agricultural land 50 1.7.3. National agroecological program 53 1.7.5. Fish resources in Serbia 55 1.7.6. Forest ecosystems 57 1.7.7. Ecosystem services – forest ecosystems 60 1.7.8. Collection of wild species from nature 63 2. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR BIODIVERSITY WITH AN ACTION PLAN AND THE INCLUSION OF BIODIVERSITY INTO OTHER SECTORS 70 2.1. The Strategy for biodiversity of the Republic of Serbia with the Action plan for the period from 2011 to 2018 70 2.2. Strategic goals of biodiversity 71 2.3. Review of the Strategy of biodiversity in Serbia 74 2.4. Activities taken at the national level regarding implementation of the Convention on Biodiversity, after submission of the Fourth national report (2011-2014) 75 2.4.1.