Mid-Term Evaluation: Anti Corruption for Peaceful & Inclusive Societies
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
March 2019 MID-TERM EVALUATION: ANTI CORRUPTION FOR PEACEFUL & INCLUSIVE SOCIETIES (ACPIS) GLOBAL PROGRAMME Kevin Deveaux & Tim Baker Deveaux International Governance Consultants Inc. (ACPIS MID-TERM EVALUATION March 2019) TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS USED .................................................................................................................. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 9 Background ...................................................................................................................................9 Mid-term Evaluation Methodology ............................................................................................... 11 Tools ........................................................................................................................................... 13 Limitations of the Review ............................................................................................................. 14 FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................... 15 Relevance .................................................................................................................................... 15 Efficiency ..................................................................................................................................... 20 Effectiveness................................................................................................................................ 24 Sustainability ............................................................................................................................... 30 Impact ......................................................................................................................................... 31 Gender Equality & Inclusivity ....................................................................................................... 31 Partnerships ................................................................................................................................ 33 Innovation ................................................................................................................................... 34 LESSONS LEARNED ............................................................................................................... 36 UNDP POSITION IN GLOBAL ANTI-CORRUPTION WORK ........................................................ 37 CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................. 39 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 39 Recommendations ....................................................................................................................... 40 ANNEX 1: Terms of Reference .............................................................................................. 42 ANNEX 2: List of Persons Interviewed .................................................................................. 48 ANNEX 3: List of Documents Consulted ................................................................................ 51 ANNEX 4: Analytical Framework Answers ............................................................................ 56 ANNEX 4: Analytical Framework Answers .................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. ANNEX 5: Pilot Project Case Studies ..................................................................................... 60 The Philippines ............................................................................................................................ 61 Papua New Guinea....................................................................................................................... 66 Thailand ...................................................................................................................................... 72 1 (ACPIS MID-TERM EVALUATION March 2019) ACRONYMS USED AC - Anti-Corruption ACA - Anti-Corruption Agency ACC – Anti-Corruption Commission ACPIS – Anti-Corruption for Peaceful and Inclusive Societies ACRC – Republic of Korea Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission BPPS - Bureau for Policy and Programme Support CO – Country Office (UNDP) CoP - Community of Practice CoSP - Conference of States Parties CSO - Civil Society Organisation DFAT - Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (Australia) GAIN - Global Anti-Corruption Initiative IACC - International Anti-Corruption Conference INGO – International Non-Governmental Organisation M&E - Monitoring and Evaluation MTE - Mid Term Evaluation NGO – Non-Governmental Organisation OECD - Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development PACDE – Global Programme on Anti-Corruption for Development Effectiveness QAI – Quality at Implementation Report (DFAT) RBx - Regional Bureaux RC - Regional Centre Sida – Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency SDG – Sustainable Development Goal 2 (ACPIS MID-TERM EVALUATION March 2019) TI - Transparency International ToR - Terms of Reference UN - United Nations UNCAC - United Nations Convention Against Corruption UNDP - United Nations Development Programme UNODC - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime UNSSC – United Nations System Staff College 3 (ACPIS MID-TERM EVALUATION March 2019) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ACPIS follows the implementation of UNDP’s Global Programme on Anti-Corruption for Development Effectiveness (PACDE)and UNDP’s Global Anti-Corruption Initiative (GAIN), both of which were successful in providing seed funding to Country Offices for anti-corruption pilot initiatives whilst enabling outreach and constructing partnerships with the regional and global anti-corruption communities of practice. Since the inception of ACPIS in 2016 and at the mid- point of programme implementation, the remaining two years will determine the scope and reach of a potential follow-on programme from second half of 2020. Although significant progress has been made in fighting the global scourge of corruption in recent years, corruption continues to harm national development processes and undermine democracy and the rule of law, contributing to the culture of impunity and violence. Recognizing the detrimental impact of corruption on sustainable development, nearly all countries have ratified or acceded to the UN Convention against Corruption (UNCAC). With 186 states parties as of 26 June 2018, UNCAC has been influential in enabling states parties to adopt national legal instruments to combat corruption, including anti-corruption laws and strategies, and the establishment of anti-corruption institutions. Moreover, the adoption of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development by 193 Member States on 25 September 2015 was a major breakthrough for the anti-corruption movement because it capitalizes on the importance of promoting transparency, accountability and anti- corruption, and makes an explicit link between corruption, peace and just and inclusive societies. With the above-mentioned background, the multi-year support of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT), Australia to UNDP’s anti-corruption work has been very important to promote the transparency, accountability and integrity agendas at the global, regional and country levels. In 2012-2016 DFAT Australia supported UNDP’s Global Anti-corruption Initiative (GAIN) to implement anti-corruption initiatives in close collaboration with UNODC and a joint UNDP-UNODC anti-corruption project for the Pacific. The top 5 achievements of Australia’s support to UNDP’s work for 2012-2016 are as follows: 1) Anti-corruption is now considered an integral part of national development plans and strategies; 2) The participation of civil society and other major actors in the implementation of UNCAC has been enhanced; 3) The role of Anti-Corruption Agencies as an important entry point to initiate anti-corruption reforms has been strengthened; 4) Gender and youth empowerment was promoted as part of anti- corruption strategies; and 5) The use of ICTs and new technologies has facilitated people’s ability to hold authorities to account in the fight against corruption.1 With primary funding from DFAT and additional seed funding from the Government of Liechtenstein and UNDP, the third phase of UNDP’s anti-corruption global programme has seen continued success in the fight against corruption at all levels of government and society. As evidenced in this report, however, ACPIS has both benefitted from the success of predecessor 1 Excerpted in part from the UNDP TOR for this consultancy. 4 (ACPIS MID-TERM EVALUATION March 2019) AC programmes and been limited due to the narrower focus on the Indo-Pacific region2 in comparison to PACDE and GAIN. ACPIS has a total budget of AUD 6,550,665 over four years from 2016 to 2020. The project aims to integrate anti-corruption solutions in service delivery such as health, education, water, construction, etc., strengthen institutional capacity of integrity institutions to prevent corruption, promote knowledge and advocacy to support anti-corruption efforts. More specifically, the ACPIS programme aims to contribute to strengthening the national capacities and integrate anti-corruption measures