DOCSLIB.ORG

Tulajdonnevek Helyesírása a Csillagászati És Az Űrtani Szaknyelvben

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tulajdonnevek Helyesírása a Csillagászati És Az Űrtani Szaknyelvben Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem Bölcsészettudományi Kar DOKTORI DISSZERTÁCIÓ Kozma Judit TULAJDONNEVEK HELYESÍRÁSA A CSILLAGÁSZATI ÉS AZ ŰRTANI SZAKNYELVBEN Nyelvtudományi doktori iskola, vezet ője: dr. Bárdosi Vilmos CSc Magyar nyelvészeti doktori program, vezet ője: Tolcsvai Nagy Gábor DSc Névtan alprogram, vezet ője: Farkas Tamás PhD A bizottság tagjai: Elnök: dr. Szathmári István DSc Opponensek: dr. Fercsik Erzsébet PhD és dr. Szabados László DSc Titkár: dr. Veszelszki Ágnes PhD További tagok: dr. Kaánné Keszler Borbála DSc Antalné dr. Szabó Ágnes és Okosné dr. Bozsik Gabriella (póttagok) Témavezet ő: dr. Laczkó Krisztina PhD Budapest 2013 1 „A nyelvész mindig a rendszert keresi, de soha nem tévesztheti szem el ől a rendszertelenséget sem”. (MEZ Ő 1994: 111). „A helyesírásban nem kizárólag az egységességre való törekvés érvényesül. Igaz ugyan, hogy az írásban nagyobb egységesség lehet, mint a szóbeliségben, de szüntelenül hat az egyidej ű rugalmas használat és az id őbeli fejl ődés ereje, tehát az állandó változás” (HEXENDORF 1974: 5). 2 TARTALOMJEGYZÉK Az ábrák és a táblázatok jegyzéke ................................................................................ 7 1. Bevezetés...................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 A témaválasztás indoklása...................................................................................... 9 1.1.1 Személyes érdekl ődés...................................................................................... 9 1.1.2 Tudományos jelent őség ................................................................................... 9 1.1.3 A dolgozat célja............................................................................................. 11 1.2 A dolgozat felépítése ............................................................................................ 12 1.3 Anyag és módszer................................................................................................. 14 2. Elméleti alapvetések ................................................................................................. 17 2.1 Terminológiai kérdések ........................................................................................ 17 2.2 A csillagászat és az űrtan meghatározása............................................................. 19 2.2.1 A csillagászat és az űrtan részterületei és társtudományai ............................ 19 2.3 A tulajdonnevek rendszerezése, a csillagászati-űrtani elnevezések helye a nevek rendszerében ............................................................................................................... 23 2.3.1 Rendszerezhet őek-e a tulajdonnevek?........................................................... 23 2.3.2 A csillagászati nevek helye a tulajdonnevek rendszerében........................... 24 2.3.3 Tulajdonnevek a helyesírási szabályzatokban............................................... 25 2.3.4 A dolgozatban alkalmazott rendszerezés....................................................... 28 2.4 Szaknyelvek.......................................................................................................... 29 2.4.1 A szaknyelvek speciális tulajdonságai .......................................................... 30 2.4.2 Szaknyelvm űvelés, szaknyelvi helyesírások ................................................. 31 3. Nem specifikusan csillagászati vagy űrtani tulajdonnevek helyesírása............... 35 3.1 Személynevek....................................................................................................... 35 3.1.1 Alapalakok..................................................................................................... 36 3.1.1.1 A magyar személynevek írása és az idegen személynevek átírása ........ 36 3.1.1.2 Névkiegészít ők ....................................................................................... 37 3.1.1.3 Névrövidítések........................................................................................ 38 3.1.2 Toldalékos és összetételi formák................................................................... 39 3.2 Állatnevek............................................................................................................. 40 3.2.1 Alapalakok..................................................................................................... 40 3.2.2 Toldalékos és összetételi formák................................................................... 40 3.3 Intézménynevek.................................................................................................... 42 3 3.3.1 Alapalakok..................................................................................................... 42 3.3.1.1 Az intézmények hivatalos és nem hivatalos megnevezéseinek írása ..... 43 3.3.1.2 Külön- és egybeírás az intézménynevekben névelemként megjelen ő közszavak esetében............................................................................................. 44 3.3.1.3 A rendezvénynevek írása........................................................................ 46 3.3.2 Toldalékos és összetételi formák................................................................... 47 3.4 Díjak, kitüntetések neve ....................................................................................... 49 3.4.1 Alapalakok..................................................................................................... 49 3.4.2 Toldalékos és összetételi formák................................................................... 50 3.5 Címek.................................................................................................................... 52 3.5.1 Alapalakok..................................................................................................... 52 3.5.2 Toldalékos és összetételi formák................................................................... 54 4. Csillagászati és űrtani tulajdonnevek helyesírása ................................................. 56 4.1 Bolygók és exobolygók neve................................................................................ 56 4.1.1 Alapalakok..................................................................................................... 57 4.1.2 Toldalékos és összetételi formák................................................................... 61 4.1.3 Exobolygónevek ............................................................................................ 72 4.2 Kis- és törpebolygók............................................................................................. 74 4.2.1 Alapalakok..................................................................................................... 79 4.2.2 Toldalékos és összetételi formák................................................................... 81 4.3 Holdak .................................................................................................................. 83 4.3.1 Alapalakok..................................................................................................... 86 4.3.2 Toldalékos és összetételi formák................................................................... 88 4.4 Csillagképek ......................................................................................................... 92 4.4.1 Alapalakok..................................................................................................... 94 4.4.1.1 Népi nevek............................................................................................ 101 4.4.2 Toldalékos és összetételi formák................................................................. 103 4.5 Csillagok............................................................................................................. 106 4.5.1 Alapalakok................................................................................................... 106 4.5.1.1 Sajátnevek............................................................................................. 107 4.5.1.2 Nevek a csillagképek alapján ............................................................... 108 4.5.1.3 Katalógusszámok.................................................................................. 111 4.5.1.4 Népi elnevezések .................................................................................. 112 4.5.2 Toldalékos és összetételi formák................................................................. 112 4.6 Üstökösök ........................................................................................................... 115 4.6.1 Alapalakok................................................................................................... 115 4.6.2 Toldalékos és összetételi formák................................................................. 118 4.7 Meteorok............................................................................................................. 119 4.7.1 Alapalakok................................................................................................... 119 4 4.7.2 Toldalékos és összetételi formák................................................................. 122 4.8 Mélyég-objektumok............................................................................................ 124 4.8.1 Alapalakok................................................................................................... 125 4.8.2 Toldalékos és összetételi formák................................................................. 127 4.9 Felszínformák ....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FY08 Technical Papers by GSMTPO Staff
    AURA/NOAO ANNUAL REPORT FY 2008 Submitted to the National Science Foundation July 23, 2008 Revised as Complete and Submitted December 23, 2008 NGC 660, ~13 Mpc from the Earth, is a peculiar, polar ring galaxy that resulted from two galaxies colliding. It consists of a nearly edge-on disk and a strongly warped outer disk. Image Credit: T.A. Rector/University of Alaska, Anchorage NATIONAL OPTICAL ASTRONOMY OBSERVATORY NOAO ANNUAL REPORT FY 2008 Submitted to the National Science Foundation December 23, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. 1 1 SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES AND FINDINGS ..................................................................................... 2 1.1 Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory...................................................................................... 2 The Once and Future Supernova η Carinae...................................................................................................... 2 A Stellar Merger and a Missing White Dwarf.................................................................................................. 3 Imaging the COSMOS...................................................................................................................................... 3 The Hubble Constant from a Gravitational Lens.............................................................................................. 4 A New Dwarf Nova in the Period Gap............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dust and Gas in the Disk of Hl Tauri: Surface Density, Dust Settling, and Dust-To-Gas Ratio C
    The Astrophysical Journal, 816:25 (12pp), 2016 January 1 doi:10.3847/0004-637X/816/1/25 © 2016. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. DUST AND GAS IN THE DISK OF HL TAURI: SURFACE DENSITY, DUST SETTLING, AND DUST-TO-GAS RATIO C. Pinte1,2, W. R. F. Dent3, F. Ménard1,2, A. Hales3,4, T. Hill3, P. Cortes3,4, and I. de Gregorio-Monsalvo3 1 UMI-FCA, CNRS/INSU, France (UMI 3386), and Dept. de Astronomía, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile; [email protected] 2 Univ. Grenoble Alpes, IPAG, F-38000 Grenoble, France CNRS, IPAG, F-38000 Grenoble, France 3 Atacama Large Millimeter/Submillimeter Array, Joint ALMA Observatory, Alonso de Córdova 3107, Vitacura 763-0355, Santiago, Chile 4 National Radio Astronomy Observatory, 520 Edgemont Road, Charlottesville, VA 22903-2475, USA Received 2015 March 22; accepted 2015 September 8; published 2015 December 29 ABSTRACT The recent ALMA observations of the disk surrounding HL Tau reveal a very complex dust spatial distribution. We present a radiative transfer model accounting for the observed gaps and bright rings as well as radial changes of the emissivity index. We find that the dust density is depleted by at least a factor of 10 in the main gaps compared to the surrounding rings. Ring masses range from 10–100 M⊕ in dust, and we find that each of the deepest gaps is consistent with the removal of up to 40 M⊕ of dust. If this material has accumulated into rocky bodies, these would be close to the point of runaway gas accretion.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Resolution Spectroscopy of Fu Orionis Stars G
    The Astrophysical Journal, 595:384–411, 2003 September 20 # 2003. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. HIGH-RESOLUTION SPECTROSCOPY OF FU ORIONIS STARS G. H. Herbig Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822 P. P. Petrov Crimean Astrophysical Observatory, p/o Nauchny, Crimea 98409, Ukraine1 and R. Duemmler2 Astronomy Division, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 3000, Oulu FIN-90014, Finland Received 2003 February 28; accepted 2003 May 29 ABSTRACT High-resolution spectroscopy was obtained of the FU orionis stars FU Ori and V1057 Cyg between 1995 and 2002 with the SOFIN spectrograph at the Nordic Optical Telescope and with HIRES at Keck I. During these years FU Ori remained about 1 mag (in B) below its 1938–39 maximum brightness, but V1057 Cyg (B 10:5 at peak in 1970–1971) faded from about 13.5 to 14.9 and then recovered slightly. Their photo- spheric spectra resemble that of a rotationally broadened, slightly veiled supergiant of about type G0 Ib, with À1 À1 veq sin i ¼ 70 km s for FU Ori, and 55 km s for V1057 Cyg. As V1057 Cyg faded, P Cyg structure in H and the IR Ca ii lines strengthened and a complex shortward-displaced shell spectrum of low-excitation lines of the neutral metals (including Li i and Rb i) increased in strength, disappeared in 1999, and reappeared in 2001. Several SOFIN runs extended over a number of successive nights so that a search for rapid and cyclic changes in the spectra was possible.
    [Show full text]
  • SN 2005Cs in M51 – II
    Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 394, 2266–2282 (2009) doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14505.x SN 2005cs in M51 – II. Complete evolution in the optical and the near-infrared A. Pastorello,1 S. Valenti,1 L. Zampieri,2 H. Navasardyan,2 S. Taubenberger,3 S. J. Smartt,1 A. A. Arkharov,4 O. Barnbantner,¨ 5 H. Barwig,5 S. Benetti,2 P. Birtwhistle,6 M. T. Botticella,1 E. Cappellaro,2 M. Del Principe,7 F. Di Mille,8 G. Di Rico,7 M. Dolci,7 N. Elias-Rosa,9 N. V. Efimova,4,10 M. Fiedler,11 A. Harutyunyan,2,12 P. A. Hoflich,¨ 13 W. Kloehr,14 V. M. Larionov,4,10,15 V. Lorenzi,12 J. R. Maund,16,17 N. Napoleone,18 M. Ragni,7 M. Richmond,19 C. Ries,5 S. Spiro,1,18,20 S. Temporin,21 M. Turatto22 and J. C. Wheeler17 1Astrophysics Research Centre, School of Mathematics and Physics, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN 2INAF Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Vicolo dell’Osservatorio 5, 35122 Padova, Italy 3Max-Planck-Institut fur¨ Astrophysik, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 1, 85741 Garching bei Munchen,¨ Germany 4Central Astronomical Observatory of Pulkovo, 196140 St Petersburg, Russia 5Universitats-Sternwarte¨ Munchen,¨ Scheinerstr. 1, 81679 Munchen,¨ Germany 6Great Shefford Observatory, Phlox Cottage, Wantage Road, Great Shefford RG17 7DA 7INAF Osservatorio Astronomico di Collurania, via M. Maggini, 64100 Teramo, Italy 8Dipartmento of Astronomia, Universita´ di Padova, Vicolo dell’Osservatorio 2, 35122 Padova, Italy 9Spitzer Science Center, California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 10Astronomical Institute of St Petersburg University, St Petersburg, Petrodvorets, Universitetsky pr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Search for Another Earth – Part II
    GENERAL ARTICLE The Search for Another Earth – Part II Sujan Sengupta In the first part, we discussed the various methods for the detection of planets outside the solar system known as the exoplanets. In this part, we will describe various kinds of exoplanets. The habitable planets discovered so far and the present status of our search for a habitable planet similar to the Earth will also be discussed. Sujan Sengupta is an 1. Introduction astrophysicist at Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Bengaluru. He works on the The first confirmed exoplanet around a solar type of star, 51 Pe- detection, characterisation 1 gasi b was discovered in 1995 using the radial velocity method. and habitability of extra-solar Subsequently, a large number of exoplanets were discovered by planets and extra-solar this method, and a few were discovered using transit and gravi- moons. tational lensing methods. Ground-based telescopes were used for these discoveries and the search region was confined to about 300 light-years from the Earth. On December 27, 2006, the European Space Agency launched 1The movement of the star a space telescope called CoRoT (Convection, Rotation and plan- towards the observer due to etary Transits) and on March 6, 2009, NASA launched another the gravitational effect of the space telescope called Kepler2 to hunt for exoplanets. Conse- planet. See Sujan Sengupta, The Search for Another Earth, quently, the search extended to about 3000 light-years. Both Resonance, Vol.21, No.7, these telescopes used the transit method in order to detect exo- pp.641–652, 2016. planets. Although Kepler’s field of view was only 105 square de- grees along the Cygnus arm of the Milky Way Galaxy, it detected a whooping 2326 exoplanets out of a total 3493 discovered till 2Kepler Telescope has a pri- date.
    [Show full text]
  • Naming the Extrasolar Planets
    Naming the extrasolar planets W. Lyra Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69177, Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Abstract and OGLE-TR-182 b, which does not help educators convey the message that these planets are quite similar to Jupiter. Extrasolar planets are not named and are referred to only In stark contrast, the sentence“planet Apollo is a gas giant by their assigned scientific designation. The reason given like Jupiter” is heavily - yet invisibly - coated with Coper- by the IAU to not name the planets is that it is consid- nicanism. ered impractical as planets are expected to be common. I One reason given by the IAU for not considering naming advance some reasons as to why this logic is flawed, and sug- the extrasolar planets is that it is a task deemed impractical. gest names for the 403 extrasolar planet candidates known One source is quoted as having said “if planets are found to as of Oct 2009. The names follow a scheme of association occur very frequently in the Universe, a system of individual with the constellation that the host star pertains to, and names for planets might well rapidly be found equally im- therefore are mostly drawn from Roman-Greek mythology. practicable as it is for stars, as planet discoveries progress.” Other mythologies may also be used given that a suitable 1. This leads to a second argument. It is indeed impractical association is established. to name all stars. But some stars are named nonetheless. In fact, all other classes of astronomical bodies are named.
    [Show full text]
  • Distance Estimate and Progenitor Characteristics of SN 2005Cs In
    Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 1–7 (2006) Printed 9 July 2018 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) Distance estimate and progenitor characteristics of SN 2005cs in M51 K. Tak´ats1⋆ and J. Vink´o1† 1Department of Optics and Quantum Electronics, University of Szeged, D´om t´er 9., Szeged, Hungary Accepted; Received; in original form ABSTRACT Distance to the Whirlpool Galaxy (M51, NGC 5194) is estimated using published pho- tometry and spectroscopy of the Type II-P supernova SN 2005cs. Both the Expanding Photosphere Method (EPM) and the Standard Candle Method (SCM), suitable for SNe II-P, were applied. The average distance (7.1 ± 1.2 Mpc) is in good agreement with earlier SBF- and PNLF-based distances, but slightly longer than the distance obtained by Baron et al. (1996) for SN 1994I via the Spectral Fitting Expanding At- mosphere Method (SEAM). Since SN 2005cs exhibited low expansion velocity during the plateau phase, similarly to SN 1999br, the constants of SCM were re-calibrated including the data of SN 2005cs as well. The new relation is better constrained in the −1 low velocity regime (vph(50) ∼ 1500−2000km s ), that may result in better distance estimates for such SNe. The physical parameters of SN 2005cs and its progenitor is re-evaluated based on the updated distance. All the available data support the low- mass (∼ 9 M⊙) progenitor scenario proposed previously by its direct detection with the Hubble Space Telescope (Maund et al. 2005; Li et al. 2006). Key words: stars: evolution – supernovae: individual (SN 2005cs) – galaxies: indi- vidual (M51) 1 INTRODUCTION Both teams have detected the possible progenitor, but only in the I band, which led to the conclusion that the progeni- The Type II-P SN 2005cs in M51 was discovered by Kloehr arXiv:astro-ph/0608430v1 21 Aug 2006 tor was probably a red giant.
    [Show full text]
  • Condensation of the Solar Nebular
    Formation of the Sun-like Stars • Collapse of a portion of a molecular cloud 4.5-4.6 Ga – Star dusts in primitive meteorites provide – Fingerprints of neaby stars that preceded our Sun – Stars like our Sun can form in a large number (hundreds to thousands) and close to each other (0.1 pc or ~0.3 lightyear, much closer than the Sun’s neighbor stars) as seen in the Orion Nebular. – Modern molecular clouds also has circumstellar disks, where planets form. – Gas in the molecular clouds is cold (~4K) and relatively dense (104 atoms/cm3). 1 Formation of the Sun-like Stars • Young stars emits more infrared radiation than a blackbody of the same size –Due to dark (opaque) disks around them. –Such disks are dubbed “proplyds” (proto-planetary disks). • Planets in the solar system orbit the Sun in the same direction and the orbits are roughly coplanar. –Suggests the solar system originated from a disk-shaped region of material referred to as the solar nebular. –An old idea conceived at least 2 centuries ago. –Discovery of proplyds now provide strong support. 2 Formation of the Sun-like Stars • Not clear what triggers the collapse of the densest portion of the cloud (“core”) to form stars. – Sequential ages of stars in close proximity in a molecular cloud suggests that formation and evolution of some stars trigger the formation of additional stars. • Gas around the collapsing core of the molecular cloud is moving – Too much angular momentum binary star – Otherwise, a single protostar called a T Tauri star or a pre-main sequence star.
    [Show full text]
  • Stansbury Brings Listening Tour to Placitas by the Numbers
    SANDOVAL PLACITAS PRSRT-STD U.S. Postage Paid BERNALILLO Placitas, NM Permit #3 CORRALES SANDOVAL Postal Customer or Current Resident COUNTY ECRWSS NEW MEXICO SignA N INDEPENDENT PLOCAL NEWSPAPER St S INCE 1988 • VOL. 32 / NO 9 • SEPTEMBER 2021 • FREE IVEN By the numbers: D ILL New Mexico and —B the 2020 Census ~SIGNPOST STAFF While Sandoval County remains among the fastest growing counties in the state, New Mexico’s overall growth rate lags well behind its neighbors, according to data from the 2020 Census released last month. Over the last ten years, Sandoval County grew by 17,273 residents for a total population of 148,834, a 13.1 percent increase. Faster growth was noted only in Eddy County, 15.8 percent, and Lea County, 15 percent, both in the southeast Oil Patch. Sandoval remains the fourth-largest county by pop- ulation behind Bernalillo, Doña Ana, and Santa Fe counties. The state’s population reached 2.1 million with 58,343 more residents, up 2.8 percent since the 2010 Census. The nation as a whole grew by 7.4 percent, the lowest rate since the 1930s, and compares to rates U.S. Rep. Melanie Stansbury visits with John Stebbins of Placitas after her listening session of ten percent or more in states surrounding New at the Placitas Community Library. Stansbury, elected in June to fill out Rep. Deb Haaland’s term, Mexico except Oklahoma. was touring the district with her staff during the August congressional recess. Data also show New Mexico to be among the most racially and ethnically diverse state.
    [Show full text]
  • EPSC2018-126, 2018 European Planetary Science Congress 2018 Eeuropeapn Planetarsy Science Ccongress C Author(S) 2018
    EPSC Abstracts Vol. 12, EPSC2018-126, 2018 European Planetary Science Congress 2018 EEuropeaPn PlanetarSy Science CCongress c Author(s) 2018 Stellar wind interaction with the expanding atmosphere of Gliese 436b A.G. Berezutskiy (1), I.F. Shaikhislamov (1), M.L. Khodachenko (2,3) and I.B. Miroshnichenko (1,4) (1) Institute of Laser Physics, Siberian Brunch Russian Academy of Science, Novosibirsk, Russia; (2) Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Science, Graz, Austria; (3) Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia (4) Novosibirsk State Technical University, Novosibirsk, Russia ([email protected]) Abstract the escaping planetary upper atmospheric material are also taken into account. We study an exosphere of a Neptune-size exoplanet Gliese 436b, orbiting the red dwarf at an extremely 3. Results close distance (0.028 au), taking into account its interaction with the stellar wind plasma flow. It was At the initial state of the simulations, the atmosphere shown that Gliese 436 b has a bowshock region of Gliese 436b is assumed to consist of the molecular between planetary and stellar wind which localized hydrogen and helium atoms at a ratio NHe / NH2 = 1/5 on the distance of ~33 Rp, where density of planetary with the temperature 750 K. We consider the case of -3 atoms slightly dominates over the protons. a weak stellar wind (SW) with nsw=100 cm , Tsw=1 МК, Vsw=70 km/s, which is much less intense than 1. Introduction the solar wind. Because of this fact, , we did not consider generation of Energetic Neutral Atoms The modelled planet Gliese 436b has a mass (ENAs).
    [Show full text]
  • Stargazer Vice President: James Bielaga (425) 337-4384 Jamesbielaga at Aol.Com P.O
    1 - Volume MMVII. No. 1 January 2007 President: Mark Folkerts (425) 486-9733 folkerts at seanet.com The Stargazer Vice President: James Bielaga (425) 337-4384 jamesbielaga at aol.com P.O. Box 12746 Librarian: Mike Locke (425) 259-5995 mlocke at lionmts.com Everett, WA 98206 Treasurer: Carol Gore (360) 856-5135 janeway7C at aol.com Newsletter co-editor: Bill O’Neil (774) 253-0747 wonastrn at seanet.com Web assistance: Cody Gibson (425) 348-1608 sircody01 at comcast.net See EAS website at: (change ‘at’ to @ to send email) http://members.tripod.com/everett_astronomy nearby Diablo Lake. And then at night, discover the night sky like EAS BUSINESS… you've never seen it before. We hope you'll join us for a great weekend. July 13-15, North Cascades Environmental Learning Center North Cascades National Park. More information NEXT EAS MEETING – SATURDAY JANUARY 27TH including pricing, detailed program, and reservation forms available shortly, so please check back at Pacific Science AT 3:00 PM AT THE EVERETT PUBLIC LIBRARY, IN Center's website. THE AUDITORIUM (DOWNSTAIRS) http://www.pacsci.org/travel/astronomy_weekend.html People should also join and send mail to the mail list THIS MONTH'S MEETING PROGRAM: [email protected] to coordinate spur-of-the- Toby Smith, lecturer from the University of Washington moment observing get-togethers, on nights when the sky Astronomy department, will give a talk featuring a clears. We try to hold informal close-in star parties each month visualization presentation he has prepared called during the spring, summer, and fall months on a weekend near “Solar System Cinema”.
    [Show full text]
  • CONFERENCE and REVIEW PUBLICATONS, and WHITE PAPERS: Reverse Chronological Harper, GM, 2013
    CONFERENCE AND REVIEW PUBLICATONS, AND WHITE PAPERS: Reverse Chronological Harper, G. M., 2013, [Invited Review] Atmospheric structure and dynamics: the spatial and temporal domains, EAS Publications Series, Vol 60, 2013, pp.59-68 Farzone, M., Ryde, N., Harper, G. M., Lambert, J., Josselin, E., Richter, M. J., & Eriksson, K., 2013, What is the Origin of the Water Vapour Signatures in Red Giant Stars?, EAS Publications Series, Vol 60, pp.155-159 Carpenter, K. G., Ayres, T., Brown, A., Harper, G. M., & Wahlgren, G. M., 2012. The Amazing COS FUV (1320 - 1460A)˚ Spectrum of λ Vel (K4Ib-II), 16th Cambridge Workshop on Cool Stars, Stellar Systems, and the Sun. Eds. C. M. Johns-Krull, M. K. Browning, and A. A. West. San Francisco: ASP Conf Ser., Vol. 448, p.1083 Harper, G. M., Brown, A., & Redfield, S., 2012, Constraints on the Surface Magnetic Field Structure of Aldebaran (αTauri, K5 III), 16th Cambridge Workshop on Cool Stars, Stellar Systems, and the Sun. Eds. C. M. Johns-Krull, M. K. Browning, and A. A. West. San Francisco: ASP Conf Ser., Vol. 448, p.1145 O’Gorman, E. & Harper, G. M., 2012, What is Heating Arcturus’ Wind?, 16th Cambridge Workshop on Cool Stars, Stellar Systems, and the Sun. Eds. C. M. Johns-Krull, M. K. Browning, and A. A. West. San Francisco: ASP Conf Ser., Vol. 448, p.691 van Belle, G. T., Aufdenberg, J., Boyajian, T., Harper G. M., Hummel, C., Pedretti, E., Baines, E., White, R., Ravi, V., & Ridgway, S., 2012, Fundamental Stellar Properties from Optical Interferometry, 16th Cambridge Workshop on Cool Stars, Stellar Systems, and the Sun.
    [Show full text]