Herbst: EEO an American Institution
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Late Holocene Forest Dynamics, Volcanism, and Climate Change at Whitewing Mountain and San Joaquin Ridge, Mono County, Sierra Nevada, CA, USA ⁎ Constance I
Quaternary Research 66 (2006) 273–287 www.elsevier.com/locate/yqres Late Holocene forest dynamics, volcanism, and climate change at Whitewing Mountain and San Joaquin Ridge, Mono County, Sierra Nevada, CA, USA ⁎ Constance I. Millar a, , John C. King b, Robert D. Westfall a, Harry A. Alden c, Diane L. Delany a a USDA Forest Service, Sierra Nevada Research Center, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Berkeley, CA 94701, USA b Lone Pine Research, Bozeman, MT 59715, USA c Smithsonian Institution, Center for Materials Research and Education, Suitland, MD 20746, USA Received 17 June 2005 Available online 16 June 2006 Abstract Deadwood tree stems scattered above treeline on tephra-covered slopes of Whitewing Mtn (3051 m) and San Joaquin Ridge (3122 m) show evidence of being killed in an eruption from adjacent Glass Creek Vent, Inyo Craters. Using tree-ring methods, we dated deadwood to AD 815– 1350 and infer from death dates that the eruption occurred in late summer AD 1350. Based on wood anatomy, we identified deadwood species as Pinus albicaulis, P. monticola, P. lambertiana, P. contorta, P. jeffreyi, and Tsuga mertensiana. Only P. albicaulis grows at these elevations currently; P. lambertiana is not locally native. Using contemporary distributions of the species, we modeled paleoclimate during the time of sympatry to be significantly warmer (+3.2°C annual minimum temperature) and slightly drier (−24 mm annual precipitation) than present, resembling values projected for California in the next 70–100 yr. © 2006 University of Washington. All rights reserved. Keywords: Paleoecology; Medieval climate; Late Holocene; Climate change; Long Valley volcanism; Inyo Craters; Forest history; Paleoclimatic modeling; Tree-ring dating Introduction bance remain poorly understood. -
Bent's Old Fort
final master plan interpretive prospectus development concept November 1975 tJATICINAL r.,\'?!< S~RV!Ct DENVE il s: .~'-.t:E C~NTE ll 8RANCH Gr r·icriOCRAPtUCi l.lBRARY COPY BENT'S OLD FORT NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE I COLORADO RECOMMENDED John R. Patterson, Park Manager September 1975 Bent's Old Fort National Historic Site APPROVED Glen Bean, Acting Regional Director October 1975 Rocky Mountain Region United States Department of the Interior I National Park Service I master plan/interpretive prospectus/ development concept Bent's Old Fort National Historic Site/Colorado Americans had always devoutly believed that the superiority of their institutions, government, and mode of life would eventually spread, by inspiration and imitation, to less fortunate, less happy peoples. That devout belief now took a new phase: it was perhaps the American destiny to spread our free and admirable institutions by action as well as by example, by occupying territory as well as by practicing virtue.... For the sum of these feelings {was found] one of the most dynamic phrases every minted, Manifest Destiny. - Bernard de Voto CONTENTS BENT'S OLD FORT: AN INSIGHT INTO WESTWARD EXPANSION THE FO RT THROUGH TIME 9 PROPOSALS 23 management 25 development 29 interpretation 33 APPENDIXES 47 D I II 1 1 ---- ~----- /" / .' _,.~ ,_ ~.,. / ' _______-- / \ .... / ~ -- --- / -- -~ __.::::=:::-::=:----- - BENT 'S OLD FORT: AN INSIGHT INTO WESTWARD EXPANSION The 1963 master plan for Bent's Old Fort contains an admirable statement about the fort's historic significance. It is worth quoting, and reading with care. Its words are carefully chosen. Built in 1833-34 as the mountain-plains extension of St. -
The Western Services of Stephen Watts Kearny, 1815•Fi1848
New Mexico Historical Review Volume 21 Number 3 Article 2 7-1-1946 The Western Services of Stephen Watts Kearny, 1815–1848 Mendell Lee Taylor Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmhr Recommended Citation Taylor, Mendell Lee. "The Western Services of Stephen Watts Kearny, 1815–1848." New Mexico Historical Review 21, 3 (1946). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmhr/vol21/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in New Mexico Historical Review by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. ________STEPHEN_WATTS KEARNY NEW MEXICO HISTORICAL REVIEW VOL. XXI JULY, 1946 NO.3 THE WESTERN SERVICES OF STEPHEN WATTS KEARNY, 1815-18.48 By *MENDELL LEE TAYLOR TEPHEN WATTS KEARNY, the fifteenth child of Phillip and S. Susannah Kearny, was born at Newark, New Jersey, August 30, 1794. He lived in New Jersey until he matricu lated in Columbia University in 1809. While here the na tional crisis of 1812 brought his natural aptitudes to the forefront. When a call· for volunteers was made for the War of 1812, Kearny enlisted, even though he was only a few weeks away from a Bachelor of Arts degree. In the early part of the war he was captured at the battle of Queenstown. But an exchange of prisoners soon brought him to Boston. Later, for gallantry at Queenstown, he received a captaincy on April 1, 1813. After the Treaty of Ghent the army staff was cut' as much as possible. -
The Beaubien and Miranda Land Grant, 1841•Fi1846
New Mexico Historical Review Volume 42 Number 1 Article 4 1-1-1967 The Beaubien and Miranda Land Grant, 1841–1846 Lawrence R. Murphy Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmhr Recommended Citation Murphy, Lawrence R.. "The Beaubien and Miranda Land Grant, 1841–1846." New Mexico Historical Review 42, 1 (1967). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmhr/vol42/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in New Mexico Historical Review by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. 27 THE BEAUBIEN AND MIRANDA LAND GRANT 1841-1846 LAWRENCE R. MURPHY EARLY in 1841 Governor Manuel Armijo deeded a huge tract of land in what is today northern New Mexico arid Southern Col orado to Carlos Beaubien and Guadalupe Miranda. During the following five years while New Mexico remained under Mexican control, Beaubien actively endeavored to populate the grant. Struggling against the machinations of provincial politics, the bitter hatred of Father Antonio Jose Martinez of Taos, and the incursions of savage Indians who claimed the region as their own, he was unable to establish a permanent settlement during these years. Beaubien's role in proving the fertility of the soil and the richness of the grasses, however, laid the groundwork for the later establishment of a town on the Rayado River and the development of the area by his sons-in-law, Jesus G. Abreu and Lucien B. -
Native Sustainment: the North Fork Mono Tribe's
Native Sustainment The North Fork Mono Tribe's Stories, History, and Teaching of Its Land and Water Tenure in 1918 and 2009 Jared Dahl Aldern Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy from Prescott College in Education with a Concentration in Sustainability Education May 2010 Steven J. Crum, Ph.D. George Lipsitz, Ph.D. Committee Member Committee Member Margaret Field, Ph.D. Theresa Gregor, Ph.D. External Expert Reader External Expert Reader Pramod Parajuli, Ph.D. Committee Chair Native Sustainment ii Copyright © 2010 by Jared Dahl Aldern. All rights reserved. No part of this dissertation may be used, reproduced, stored, recorded, or transmitted in any form or manner whatsoever without written permission from the copyright holder or his agent(s), except in the case of brief quotations embodied in the papers of students, and in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. Requests for such permission should be addressed to: Jared Dahl Aldern 2658 East Alluvial Avenue, #103 Clovis, CA 93611 Native Sustainment iii Acknowledgments Gratitude to: The North Fork Mono Tribe, its Chairman, Ron Goode, and members Melvin Carmen (R.I.P.), Lois Conner, Stan Dandy, Richard Lavelle, Ruby Pomona, and Grace Tex for their support, kindnesses, and teachings. My doctoral committee: Steven J. Crum, Margaret Field, Theresa Gregor, George Lipsitz, and Pramod Parajuli for listening, for reading, and for their mentorship. Jagannath Adhikari, Kat Anderson, Steve Archer, Donna Begay, Lisa -
Bent's Old Fort Colorado Springs Pioneers Museum Primary Source
Bent’s Old Fort Bent’s Old Fort is located 8 miles east of La Junta, Colorado along the Arkansas River. It was the first permanent settlement in the central plains region and was an important trading post where travelers, traders, and Native Americans mixed peacefully. The Old Bent’s Fort Map drawn around 1850 by Will Boggs, an associate of Kit Carson, gives a sense of the design and surroundings of Bent’s Old Fort Most of the Boggs’ detail focuses on the structure itself and the illustration suggests the fort was built to be largely self-sufficient. The fort had trade and council rooms, sleeping quarters, storehouses, a wagon room (that could house 15 wagons), and a stone-lined well. Billiards, chess, dances, and even a racetrack outside the fort provided entertainment for travelers and the laborers housed within the walls. The fort was defended by high Colorado Springs Pioneers Museum Primary Source Resource Page 1 Bent’s Old Fort walls with two towers, a swivel gun, and two six-pound canons. The corral had lower walls planted with cactus to protect horses and mules. The existence of Boggs’ map hints at the importance of the fort. Boggs spent the winter of 1844 at the fort; six years after his visit, Boggs drew the map from memory. The map’s relative accuracy implies that Bent’s Fort held an important place in the mind of Will Boggs; that he put his memory of Bent’s Fort into a visual representation years after his visit, suggests that he also recognized its importance to others. -
Devils Postpile National Monument Geologic Resources Inventory Report
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Devils Postpile National Monument Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2009/160 THIS PAGE: The dramatic columns of Devils Postpile are between 12 and 18 m (40 and 60 ft) tall and up to 1.1 m (3.5 ft) in diameter. Seismic and weathering processes fracture the columns along joints. Broken columns litter the slopes beneath Devils Postpile. ON THE COVER: Top view of the 100,000 year-old columns of Devils Postpile. The columns are world-renowned and many form the ideal hexagonal shape. The striations and scratches are evidence that glaciers advanced over the columns, scouring their surface. National Park Service photographs. Devils Postpile National Monument Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2009/160 Geologic Resources Division Natural Resource Program Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, Colorado 80225 February 2010 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Denver, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. -
Bent's Fort Primary Resource
1 Bent’s Fort: Trade in Transition How did family relationships influence trade relationships on the southern Colorado plains? What role did Bent’s Fort play in the westward expansion of the United States? What does the story of Bent’s Fort suggest about the relationship between trade and war among American Indians and Colorado settlers? By Jennifer Goodland* Standards and Teaching Strategies by: Corey Carlson, Zach Crandall, and Marcus Lee** Paid for by a grant from the Institute of Museum and Library Sciences * Jennifer Goodland has a master’s in history from University of Colorado Denver, where she concentrated on history tourism and the American West. She taught history at Metro State in Denver. Goodland runs a history research business called Big Year Colorado. ** Corey Carlson teaches 4th grade at Flatirons Elementary in Boulder, Zach Crandall teaches 8th grade U.S. Society at Southern Hills Middle in Boulder, Marcus Lee teaches and is the chair of the social studies department at George Washington High School in Denver. 2 Contents Standards Addressed Overview Essay Resources Growing the Border 1. The Louisiana Purchase and Missouri Territory 2. Bent and St. Vrain Families 3. Colorado’s Changing Borders 4. Bent’s Fort and the Border 5. Cheyenne Territory Travel and Trade 6. Bent’s Fort Floor Plan 7. Fur Trappers and the Bent, St. Vrain and Company Network 8. Jean-Baptiste Charbonneau 9. Fugitive at Bent’s Fort 10. Mexico Retaliates 11. Battleground: Bent’s Fort 12. Kearny’s March 13. Rebellion in Taos 14. Cut Off 15. Destruction of the Fort 16. -
ARTICLE in PRESS + Model
ARTICLE IN PRESS + model YQRES-02727; No. of pages: 15; 4C: Quaternary Research xx (2006) xxx–xxx 1 www.elsevier.com/locate/yqres 2 Late holocene forest dynamics, volcanism, and climate change at whitewing 3 mountain and San Joaquin Ridge, Mono County, Sierra Nevada, CA, USA ⁎ 4 Constance I. Millar a, , John C. King b, Robert D. Westfall a, Harry A. Alden c, Diane L. Delany a 5 a USDA Forest Service, Sierra Nevada Research Center, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Berkeley, CAOF 94701, USA 6 b Lone Pine Research, Bozeman, MT 59715, USA 7 c Smithsonian Institution, Center for Materials Research and Education, Suitland, MD 20746, USA 8 Received 17 June 2005 9 Abstract 10 Deadwood tree stems scattered above treeline on tephra-covered slopes of Whitewing Mtn (3051 m) and San Joaquin Ridge (3122 m) show 11 evidence of being killed in an eruption from adjacent Glass Creek Vent, Inyo Craters. Using tree-ring methods, we dated deadwood to AD 815– 12 1350, and infer from death dates that the eruption occurred in late summer AD 1350. Based on wood anatomy, we identified deadwood species as 13 Pinus albicaulis, P. monticola, P. lambertiana, P. contorta, P. jeffreyi, and Tsuga mertensiana. Only P. albicaulis grows at these elevations 14 currently; P. lambertiana is not locally native. Using contemporary distributionsED of the species, PRO we modeled paleoclimate during the time of 15 sympatry to be significantly warmer (+3.2°C annual minimum temperature) and slightly drier (−24 mm annual precipitation) than present, 16 resembling values projected for California in the next 70–100 yr. -
CAMP: SUMMER Trail Survey On-Site Computer Stations Photo 1
CAMP Online Trails Surveys In cooperation with the Town of Mammoth Lakes, Alta Planning + Design, and Trail Solutions, MLTPA provided feedback on both the Summer and Winter Online Trail Survey questions and format, which were developed by the TOML and the consultant teams with assistance from the survey hosting company, Leisure Trends. MLTPA also conducted the majority of public outreach for these surveys, the methods of which are discussed below. The Summer Online Trail Survey ran from October 27, 2007, to March 14, 2008, and was completed by 330 people. The Winter Online Trail Survey ran from December 18, 2007, to March 14, 2008, and was completed by 316 people. (An unknown number of participants in both cases started taking the surveys, but did not finish; as a result, their input is not reflected in these totals.) Results and copies of the survey contents are available in Appendix E, “CAMP: Summer Survey Data (TOML),” and Appendix F, “CAMP: Winter Survey Data (TOML).” • Business cards Beginning with CAMP: WINTER outreach efforts, MLTPA designed, produced, and distributed business cards driving people to the MLTPA website to take both the Summer and Winter surveys. Cards were handed out by individuals and also were provided to a number of local businesses with display-ready cardholders to minimize point-of-sale clutter. • E-mail campaigns As part of their regular e-mail blasts for both events, MLTPA invited recipients to participate in both the Summer and Winter trail surveys, providing direct links to the survey URLs. Please see the “E-mail campaigns” chapters of the “CAMP: SUMMER” and “CAMP: WINTER” reports for further detail. -
2021 X9a and A16 Zone Hunt Info
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE DEER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Wildlife Branch 1010 Riverside Parkway, West Sacramento, CA 95605 ZONE X9a and Area-Specific Archery Hunt A16 2021 General Deer Hunting Information (Includes Additional Hunts G-39 and J-12) GENERAL INFORMATION This information sheet has been prepared to assist deer hunters applying for, or planning to hunt in, Zone X-9a located in portions of Fresno, Inyo, Madera, and Mono counties. The following information should be useful to hunters for archery season (A- 16; Zone X-9a Archery Hunt), Zone X-9a general season, and any “additional hunts” within this geographic area. For more specific information or additional questions regarding this area, contact the following Department office(s): • Inland Deserts Region (Region 6), Bishop Field Office (760-872-1171). REGULATIONS Laws and regulations are designed to conserve wildlife and to provide for an equitable distribution of game mammals. All hunters should read and be familiar with the Current Hunting Regulations. Remember, if you are hunting on private property you must obtain, and have in your possession, written permission to hunt on private property. Hunter trespass laws are strictly enforced. NON-LEAD RESTRICTIONS As of July 1, 2019, all hunters must use nonlead ammunition when taking any wildlife in California, except when hunting with a pellet rifle for approved species. • CCR T14 250.1(d)(3) Effective July 1, 2019, it shall be unlawful to use, or possess with any firearm capable of firing, any projectile(s) not certified as nonlead when taking any wildlife for any purpose in this state. -
Bent, St. Vrain & Co. Among the Comanche and Kiowa
Bent, St. Vrain & Co. among the Comanche and Kiowa BY JANET LECOMPTE Bent's Fort on the Arkansas was not built exclusively for the trade of the Cheyenne and Arapaho. Its owners, Charles and William Bent and Ceran St. Vrain, intended to trade with many other tribes, especially the Comanche, the most numerous Indians of the southern plains.1 Although in 1835 William Bent made the long journey to Texas to seek the Comanche's busi ness and the Indians were friendly, it was another seven years before trade with them was achieved. In the fall of 1842 Bent, St. Vrain and Company built a log post in the Texas panhandle on the south fork of the Canadian River (Red River or Rio Colorado) for the Comanche and Kiowa. The post was popular with the Indians and profitable for the company, and by the summer of 1845 another Bent post of adobe had been built within a few miles of the log fort; but in the spring of 1846 the Comanche became hostile, and the Bents abandoned their Canadian River posts, probably permanently. In later years the ruins of the adobe post were known as Adobe Walls and became the site of two Indian fights, both celebrated in nu merous "true-west" stories and Sunday-supplement thrillers as the "Battle of Adobe Walls." About the era of Bent traders on the Canadian little has been written, that little being a snarl of myth and contradiction. When the Bents and St. Vrain built their picket post on the Arkansas in 1833 or 1834, they wanted to trade with the Cheyenne, Arapaho, Kiowa, Snake (Shoshone), Sioux, and Arikara, as their trading license shows.2 By the time that they 1 In 1846 Charles Bent estimated the population of Cheyenne at 1,500, Arapaho at 1,600, K10wa at 2,000, and Comanche at 12,000, counting only the Indians of New Mexico (which included present southern Colorado) and not the many thousands of Comanche in Texas.