Environmental Settings/Biological Resources

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environmental Settings/Biological Resources Chapter 3 Environment and Habitat Contents 3 ENVIRONMENT AND HABITAT 3-1 3.1 Introduction 3-1 3.2 Environmental Context 3-1 3.2.1 Climate and hydrology in the plan area 3-1 3.2.1.1 Climate 3-1 3.2.1.2 Stream flow and peak flow 3-2 3.2.1.2.1 Rain and flooding 3-2 3.2.1.2.2 Records on the Noyo and Navarro rivers 3-2 3.2.2 Geology and geomorphology of the plan area 3-3 3.2.2.1 Geologic features 3-3 3.2.2.2 Sediment inputs 3-3 3.2.2.3 Soil types 3-3 3.2.2.4 Mass wasting 3-4 3.2.2.4.1 Forest management practices affecting mass wasting 3-4 3.2.2.4.2 Effects of mass wasting on streams 3-5 3.2.2.4.3 Effects of mass wasting on anadromous salmonid habitat 3-5 3.2.3 Historical recap of the adjustment area 3-6 3.2.3.1 Land use 3-6 3.2.3.2 Historical location of roads and tractor trails 3-7 3.2.3.2.1 Impact of cable logging on road configurations 3-7 3.2.3.2.2 Impact of skid trails on sediment delivery 3-8 3.3 Aquatic Habitat 3-8 3.3.1 General concept of a watershed 3-8 3.3.2 Definition of watershed and watershed analysis 3-9 3.3.3 Watershed analysis units 3-9 3.3.4 Resource assessment report 3-10 3.3.5 Watershed analysis process 3-11 3.3.6 Summary of aquatic habitat conditions by major streams and rivers 3-11 3.3.6.1 Interpreting MRC data on streams and rivers 3-12 3.3.7 Regional summary of aquatic habitat conditions 3-32 3.3.7.1 Stream shade 3-32 3.3.7.2 Instream LWD conditions 3-33 3.3.7.3 Anadromous salmonid habitat conditions 3-34 3.3.7.4 Spawning habitat conditions 3-34 3.3.8 Summary of sediment input by planning watershed 3-35 3.3.8.1 Interpreting MRC data on sediment inputs 3-35 3.3.9 Summary of sediment input by source of erosion 3-39 3.3.9.1 Forest roads 3-39 3.3.10 Undersized culverts 3-41 3.3.11 Regional conclusions for aquatic habitat conditions 3-43 3.3.12 Predicting changes in peak flow 3-43 3.3.12.1 Impact of forest harvest on peak flow 3-44 3.3.12.2 Impact of increased peak flow on aquatic organisms 3-44 3.3.12.3 Snow and peak flow 3-44 3.3.12.4 Logging roads and peak flow 3-45 i 3.3.12.5 Prediction of peak flow increase from forest harvest 3-45 3.3.13 Fire impacts on aquatic habitat 3-46 3.4 Terrestrial Habitat 3-46 3.4.1 Vegetation distribution in the plan area 3-46 3.4.2 AMZ distribution within the plan area 3-47 3.4.3 Natural communities 3-49 3.4.3.1 North coast coniferous 3-50 3.4.3.2 Broadleaved upland 3-52 3.4.3.3 Closed-cone coniferous 3-54 3.4.3.4 Oak woodlands 3-55 3.4.3.5 Salt marsh 3-57 3.4.3.6 Deciduous riparian 3-58 3.4.3.7 Aquatic 3-59 3.4.4 Habitat elements 3-59 3.4.4.1 Old growth trees 3-59 3.4.4.2 Wildlife trees 3-60 3.4.4.3 Downed wood 3-60 3.4.4.4 Rocky outcrops 3-60 3.4.4.5 Hardwoods within conifer stands 3-60 3.4.4.6 Wetlands, watercourses, seeps, and springs 3-60 3.4.5 CWHR habitat classification system 3-61 3.4.6 Habitat quality for wildlife 3-62 3.4.7 Habitat sensitivity to land use 3-62 ii List of Tables Table 3-1 Watershed Analysis Units in the Plan Area 3-10 Table 3-2 Qualitative Indices 3-12 Table 3-3 Ratings for Canopy Cover 3-14 Table 3-4 Ratings for Effective Shade 3-16 Table 3-5 Ratings for LWD 3-16 Table 3-6 Ratings for Stream Gravel Permeability 3-17 Table 3-7 Ratings for Sediment 3-17 Table 3-8 Aquatic Habitat Conditions for Major Streams and Rivers: 1998-2008 3-19 Table 3-9 Summary of Aquatic Conditions by Watershed Analysis Unit 3-29 Table 3-10 LWD Projects in the Plan Area: 1998-2007 3-33 Table 3-11 Sediment Inputs (1963-2003) and Current Road Density by Planning Watershed 3-37 Table 3-12 Percent of Sediment Inputs by Source of Erosion 3-39 Table 3-13 Sediment Inputs 3-39 Table 3-14 Road Classes within AMZ 3-41 Table 3-15 Culverts at Watercourse Crossings 3-43 Table 3-16 Peak Flow Predictions for CalWater Planning Watersheds in the Plan Area 3-46 Table 3-17 Distribution of Forested and Non-Forested Areas 3-47 Table 3-18 Average Canopy Closure for AMZ Stands by Planning Watershed 3-47 Table 3-19 Acres of Hardwood and Conifer-Hardwood Stands by Major Drainage 3-48 Table 3-20 MRC Natural Communities 3-49 List of Figures Figure 3-1 General Illustration of a Watershed 3-9 Figure 3-2 Headwaters and Mouth 3-15 Figure 3-3 Effective Stream Shade in MRC Planning Watersheds as of 2005 3-32 Figure 3-4 LWD Conditions in MRC Planning Watersheds as of 2005 3-33 Figure 3-5 Anadromous Salmonid Habitat Condition by Life Stage 3-34 Figure 3-6 Spawning Gravel Quality from Long Term Monitoring Segments 3-35 iii Mendocino Redwood Company HCP/NCCP 3 ENVIRONMENT AND HABITAT 3.1 Introduction In order to evaluate the proposed conversation measures of our plan, you need an understanding of the past and present state of the plan area. Chapter 3, in effect, outlines where we have come from and where we are today. The conservation measures in Chapters 8-11 will focus on where we want to go. In reviewing the past and current conditions in the plan area, we distinguish between aquatic and terrestrial habitat. Habitat is the place where a specific species is commonly DEFINITION found because it provides the physical and biological resources required for its survival and reproduction. In the first half of this chapter, we examine environmental variables and physical processes related to aquatic habitat, as well as the conditions of such habitat in the plan area. Initially, we describe the environmental context of our landscape, including climate, geological features, pollution sources, stream temperatures, and mass wasting associated with roads and hillslope failure. Next, we focus on specific parameters related to riparian zone, canopy, LWD within stream channels, instream sediment, aquatic wildlife, and hydrology In the second half of the chapter, we turn our attention to terrestrial habitat, addressing topics such as natural communities, their distribution in California and in the plan area, and their ecological factors. After examining these broader habitat issues, we zero in on specific habitat elements—old growth, wildlife trees, downed wood, rocky outcrops, wetlands—and highlight their importance for covered species in our plan. These elements provide foraging, denning, and roosting sites; cover from predators; and other day-to-day needs for species survival. For management purposes, we may never fully and scientifically understand the relationship of any one species to all the environmental variables and processes we study on our landscape. However, we can sometimes manage or create what has been identified as its habitat and, in doing so, maintain or increase its numbers. This is a main thrust of our HCP/NCCP—to improve the quantity and quality of both aquatic and terrestrial habitat. 3.2 Environmental Context 3.2.1 Climate and hydrology in the plan area 3.2.1.1 Climate The climate of the plan area is Mediterranean, with warm dry summers and moderate winters. Mean annual precipitation ranges from 40 in. along the coast at Fort Bragg and Point Arena to 50 in. at Willits. Based on climate records,1 approximately 95% of the precipitation occurs during October through May. January is on average the wettest month, when about 18% of total annual precipitation is recorded. The driest month is July, with less than 1% of total annual precipitation. Precipitation occurs predominately in the form of rain. A small portion of precipitation falls as snow, but it rarely remains long. Snowmelt and rain-on-snow are not hydrologically significant in the plan area. 1 The records are from climate stations in Standish Hickey State Park (Station No. 8490), Willits 1NE (Station No. 9684), and Point Arena (Station No. 7009). 3-1 Mendocino Redwood Company HCP/NCCP 3.2.1.2 Stream flow and peak flow 3.2.1.2.1 Rain and flooding Stream flow in the plan area is responsive to rain, with high stream flows directly following high rainfall. Floods and variations in stream flow are stochastic and distributed throughout the year when rain occurs (October–May). Along the north coast, however, where our land is located, the greatest precipitation and flooding occur in late fall and winter (December–March). Within the last decade, there have been many intense storms in the plan area and, as a result, frequent flooding in its rivers. Floods have the capacity to re-shape river or stream channels and transport large sediment loads.
Recommended publications
  • Music Industry Report 2020 Includes the Work of Talented Student Interns Who Went Through a Competitive Selection Process to Become a Part of the Research Team
    2O2O THE RESEARCH TEAM This study is a product of the collaboration and vision of multiple people. Led by researchers from the Nashville Area Chamber of Commerce and Exploration Group: Joanna McCall Coordinator of Applied Research, Nashville Area Chamber of Commerce Barrett Smith Coordinator of Applied Research, Nashville Area Chamber of Commerce Jacob Wunderlich Director, Business Development and Applied Research, Exploration Group The Music Industry Report 2020 includes the work of talented student interns who went through a competitive selection process to become a part of the research team: Alexander Baynum Shruthi Kumar Belmont University DePaul University Kate Cosentino Isabel Smith Belmont University Elon University Patrick Croke University of Virginia In addition, Aaron Davis of Exploration Group and Rupa DeLoach of the Nashville Area Chamber of Commerce contributed invaluable input and analysis. Cluster Analysis and Economic Impact Analysis were conducted by Alexander Baynum and Rupa DeLoach. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 5 - 6 Letter of Intent Aaron Davis, Exploration Group and Rupa DeLoach, The Research Center 7 - 23 Executive Summary 25 - 27 Introduction 29 - 34 How the Music Industry Works Creator’s Side Listener’s Side 36 - 78 Facets of the Music Industry Today Traditional Small Business Models, Startups, Venture Capitalism Software, Technology and New Media Collective Management Organizations Songwriters, Recording Artists, Music Publishers and Record Labels Brick and Mortar Retail Storefronts Digital Streaming Platforms Non-interactive
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Mendocino County Regional Transportation Plan
    22001177 MMEENNDDOOCCIINNOO CCOOUUNNTTYY RREEGGIIOONNAALL TTRRAANNSSPPOORRTTAATTIIOONN PPLLAANN FINAL DOPTED EBRUARY A F 5, 2018 Photos by Alexis Pedrotti Prepared for: Prepared by: Davey‐Bates Mendocino Council Consulting of Governments 2017 Regional Transportation Plan Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................1 State Highway System Element .................................................................................................1 County Roads & City Streets Element.......................................................................................1 Active Transportation ................................................................................................................2 Public Transit Service System ...................................................................................................2 Aviation System .........................................................................................................................2 Maritime Transportation ............................................................................................................3 Rail Transportation ....................................................................................................................3 Tribal Transportation .................................................................................................................3 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS
    NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS OCTOBER 2005 HISTORICAL OCCURRENCE OF COHO SALMON IN STREAMS OF THE CENTRAL CALIFORNIA COAST COHO SALMON EVOLUTIONARILY SIGNIFICANT UNIT Brian C. Spence Scott L. Harris Weldon E. Jones Matthew N. Goslin Aditya Agrawal Ethan Mora NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-383 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Southwest Fisheries Science Center NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), organized in 1970, has evolved into an agency which establishes national policies and manages and conserves our oceanic, coastal, and atmospheric resources. An organizational element within NOAA, the Office of Fisheries is responsible for fisheries policy and the direction of the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). In addition to its formal publications, the NMFS uses the NOAA Technical Memorandum series to issue informal scientific and technical publications when complete formal review and editorial processing are not appropriate or feasible. Documents within this series, however, reflect sound professional work and may be referenced in the formal scientific and technical literature. Disclaimer of endorsement: Reference to any specific commercial products, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government. The views and opinions of authors expressed in this document do not necessarily state or reflect those of NOAA or the United States Government, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS This TM series is used for documentation and timely communication of preliminary results, interim reports, or special purpose information.
    [Show full text]
  • North Pacific Ocean
    314 ¢ U.S. Coast Pilot 7, Chapter 8 19 SEP 2021 125° 124° OREGON 42° 123° Point St. George Crescent City 18603 KLAMATH RIVER Trinidad Head 18600 41° 18605 HUMBOLDT BAY Eureka 18622 18623 CALIFORNIA Cape Mendocino Punta Gorda Point Delgada 40° Cape Vizcaino 18626 Point Cabrillo NOYO RIVER 18628 39° 18620 18640 Point Arena NORTH PA CIFIC OCEAN Bodega Head 18643 TOMALES BAY 38° Point Reyes Bolinas Point San Francisco Chart Coverage in Coast Pilot 7—Chapter 8 NOAA’s Online Interactive Chart Catalog has complete chart coverage http://www.charts.noaa.gov/InteractiveCatalog/nrnc.shtml 19 SEP 2021 U.S. Coast Pilot 7, Chapter 8 ¢ 315 San Francisco Bay to Point St. George, California (1) the season, and precipitation of 0.1 inch (2.54 mm) or ENC - US2WC06M more can be expected on about 10 to 11 days per month Chart - 18010 south of Cape Mendocino and on up to 20 days to the north. Snow falls occasionally along this north coast. (9) Winds in spring are more variable than in winter, as (2) This chapter describes Bodega Bay, Tomales Bay, Noyo River and Anchorage, Shelter Cove, Humboldt the subtropical high builds and the Aleutian Low shrinks. Bay and numerous other small coves and bays. The only The change takes place gradually from north to south. deep-draft harbor is Humboldt Bay, which has the largest Northwest through north winds become more common city along this section of the coast, Eureka. The other while south winds are not quite so prevalent. With the important places, all for small craft, are Bodega Harbor, decrease in storm activity, rain falls on only about 6 Noyo River, Shelter Cove and Crescent City Harbor.
    [Show full text]
  • Borneo Post-Sarawak BTS Make Third Debut Atop Billboard Hot
    Borneo Post-Sarawak Section: Leisure Ad Value: RM 7,790 3-Jun-2021 Size : 554cm2 PR Value: RM 23,371 BTS make third debut atop Billboard Hot 100 hotter A file photo showing BTS members pose during a news conference for their new digital single 'Butter' in eastern Seoul on May 21,2021. BTS make third debut atop Billboard Hot 100 K-POP supergroup BTS achieved first Grammy nomination. four initial leaders since Justin the band's management agency. another historic milestone, Later in the year, the groups Timberlake" and among groups The English-language single landing at No. 1 on the song “Life Goes On" that was the "fastest run to four initial also racked up 108.2 million Billboards main singles chart the main track for their album Hot 100 No. is since the Jackson views on YouTube in its first 24 with their latest single, "Butter," “BE," became the first song 5 in 1970." hours of release, outnumbering Yonhap news agency reported predominantly sung in Korean “Butter,“ released on May 21, is "Dynamite" at 101.1 million views. yesterday. to debut at the top spot on the a vibrant summer number that The music video for the new "BTS' "Butter" bounds in at No. main singles chart. the group hoped would give off single also recorded more than 1 on the Billboard Hot 100 songs "BTS are now the first and good energy during the global 3.9 million peak concurrents, chart," Billboard said Tuesday only group in history with coronavirus pandemic. becoming the biggest YouTube (US time), citing figures from multiple No.
    [Show full text]
  • MRC Annual Report 2018
    MEKONG RIVER COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT 2018 Part 1 Overview The MRC is funded by contribution from its member countries and development partners of Australia, Belgium, European Union, Finland, France, Germany, Japan, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, and the World Bank. Table of Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms ................................................................................................................ I Message from the Chief Executive Officer ......................................................................................... IV Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. V Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 1 OUTCOME 1: Council Study informs debate and work on basin development, reporting and management planning ............................................................................................................................................................. 9 OUTCOME 2: Study to support sustainable hydropower explores alternative pathways for the lower Mekong ............................................................................................................................................................ 15 OUTCOME 3: Preliminary Design Guidance for proposed mainstream dams updated to provide a benchmark for leading sustainable hydropower design ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Midyear Report Canada 2020
    NIELSEN MUSIC / MRC DATA MIDYEAR REPORT CANADA 2020 1 Introduction HAT A DIFFERENCE A FEW MONTHS MAKE. IT’S HARD TO BELIEVE THAT IT WASN’T even six months ago that Shakira and Jennifer Lopez performed for a tightly packed crowd of more than 60,000 people in Miami at the Super Bowl, while Billie Eilish and her brother Finneas picked up five Grammys at what turned out to be 2020’s last major music business gathering since COVID-19 halted live events. WBy Friday, March 13, the NBA and NHL had suspended play, the NCAA had canceled its spring tournaments, and theaters and live music venues had closed. As “safer at home” orders spread throughout the country, our homes became our offices, our schools, our daycares and our social hubs. Quickly and dramatically, life had changed. Our routines were disrupted, and we struggled to find balance. Still, the music industry was experiencing a strong start to the year. Audio streaming was growing through early March, up 20.9% over the same period in 2019. Total music consumption was up 10.8% in the first 10 weeks of the year. As working from home became a reality for many, some of the key music listening hours, such as during commutes, were disrupted. But one thing that has remained consistent as the pandemic has unfolded is entertainment’s place in helping consumers escape, relax and feel energized. In fact, in our recent consumer research studies, 73% of people said they would go crazy without entertainment during this time. Then, just as many communities began to slowly reopen, the country was shaken by the senseless May 25 killing of George Floyd by Minneapolis police.
    [Show full text]
  • "Noyo River Total Maximum Daily Load for Sediment, TMDL Report
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX Noyo River Total Maximum Daily Load for Sediment Approved by: original signed by 16 December 1999 ____________________ ____________ Alexis Strauss Date Director, Water Division TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables ...............................................................ii List of Figures ..............................................................ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................1 A. Section 303(d) and the Noyo River Watershed ................................1 B. Components of the TMDL ...............................................1 CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION ...............................................5 A. Characteristics of the Noyo River Watershed .................................5 B. Application of Section 303(d) to the Noyo River Watershed ......................5 C. Data Sources .........................................................7 D. Components of a TMDL ................................................7 CHAPTER II: EXISTING WATER QUALITY REQUIREMENTS ....................9 A. Beneficial Uses ........................................................9 B. Water Quality Objectives ...............................................10 CHAPTER III: PROBLEM STATEMENT ......................................11 A. General Background ..................................................11 B. Description of the Noyo River Watershed ...................................12 C. Summary of Findings for the Noyo River Watershed Overall ....................15 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Noyo River Total Maximum Daily Load for Sediment
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX Noyo River Total Maximum Daily Load for Sediment Approved by: original signed by 16 December 1999 ____________________ ____________ Alexis Strauss Date Director, Water Division TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables ...............................................................ii List of Figures ..............................................................ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................1 A. Section 303(d) and the Noyo River Watershed ................................1 B. Components of the TMDL ...............................................1 CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION ...............................................5 A. Characteristics of the Noyo River Watershed .................................5 B. Application of Section 303(d) to the Noyo River Watershed ......................5 C. Data Sources .........................................................7 D. Components of a TMDL ................................................7 CHAPTER II: EXISTING WATER QUALITY REQUIREMENTS ....................9 A. Beneficial Uses ........................................................9 B. Water Quality Objectives ...............................................10 CHAPTER III: PROBLEM STATEMENT ......................................11 A. General Background ..................................................11 B. Description of the Noyo River Watershed ...................................12 C. Summary of Findings for the Noyo River Watershed Overall ....................15 D.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 CERTIFIED for PUBLICATION in the COURT of APPEAL of the STATE of CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---CENTRAL
    Filed 1/5/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- CENTRAL COAST FOREST ASSOCIATION et al., C060569 Plaintiffs and Respondents, (Super. Ct. No. 07CS00851) v. OPINION ON REMAND FISH AND GAME COMMISSION, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, Gail D. Ohanesian, Judge. (Retired judge of the Sacramento Super. Ct., assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to art. VI, § 6 of the Cal. Const.) Reversed. Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Kamala D. Harris and Xavier Becerra Attorneys General, Mary E. Hackenbracht, Kathleen A. Kenealy and Robert W. Byrne, Assistant Attorneys General, Sara J. Russell, Gavin G. McCabe, Tara L. Mueller and Cecilia L. Dennis, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Appellant. Deborah A. Sivas, Robb W. Kapla and Molly Loughney for Environmental Law Clinic, Center for Biological Diversity, Turtle Island Restoration Network, California Trout, Central Coast Forest Watch and Lompico Watershed Conservancy as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Appellant. Murphy & Buchal and James L. Buchal for Plaintiffs and Respondents. Damien M. Schiff and Anthony L. Francois for Pacific Legal Foundation as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Respondents. 1 The California Endangered Species Act (Fish & G. Code, § 2050 et seq., hereafter CESA)1 provides that a wild, native, species may be added to or removed from the regulation listing endangered species by a finding of the Fish and Game Commission (Commission) based on scientific information from the Department of Fish and Wildlife (department).2 (§§ 2074.6, 2075.5.) The standard for adding a wild, native species is that it is in serious danger of extinction.
    [Show full text]
  • THE RESOURCES AGENCY of CALIFORNIA Department of Fish and Game
    ,;’ ,F,,y _ THE RESOURCES AGENCY OF CALIFORNIA Department of Fish and Game STREAM SURVEY FILE FORM No...... ..... .............. Date September 18. 1967 NAME..... Redwood Creek. ..........COUNTY Mendocino........... STREAM SECTION e FROM mouth ........To headwaters...LENGTH ...4 mi. TRIBUTARY TO Noyo River .................Twp 18N..R15W..Sec. 11 ... SOURCES OF DATA ...Personal observation and interviews with McGuire and Schanders EXTENT OF OBSERVATION -Surveyed by foot from mouth at Noyo River to 0.12 mile above northeast fork in headwaters, a point marked by an old logging landing, a total distance of 4 miles. Survey made by E.R.Y. Primbs on 14 August 1966. LOCATION -Redwood Creek flows into the Noyo River at the Masonite Redwood Creek Road crossing of the Noyo River, which crossing is 0.12 mile on the Masonite Rd. from the junction of the Masonite Road with the Shake City Road. The junction of the Masonite Road- Shake City Road is located 0.75 mile from the Shake City Road- Irmulco Road junction on-the Shake City Roads. The Shake City Road joins the Irmulco Road 4.75 miles from the Fort Bragg-Willits Road (Highway 20) on the Irmulco Road. The Irmulco Road joins Highway 20, 6.25 miles west of Willits on Highway 20. A 9 ft. culvert under the tracks of the California Western R.R. marks the mouth of Redwood Creek. RELATION TO OTHER WATERS- Provides the Noyo River system with 1.05 miles of excellent spawning grounds, 0.68 miles of fair spawning grounds, and 4.0 miles of good nursery area for steel- head and silver salmon.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. PODCAST 360 REPORT 2021 MARCH 2021 Copyright © 2019 the Nielsen MRC Data Company (US), LLC
    U.S. PODCAST 360 REPORT 2021 MARCH 2021 Methodology: U.S. Podcast & Audio 360 2021 STUDY DATA SAMPLE QUOTA CLICK TIMING COLLECTION SIZE BALANCING BALANCING U.S. Podcast & Audio Online surveys Interviews were Gen Pop data is For Podcast Listeners, 360 data was using third-party conducted among a representative of click / contact balancing collected February panels were used to total of 507 U.S. U.S. census was done to ensure 19th through March collect responses. Gen Pop Ages 13+ population that the body of 3, 2021. and 2,013 Podcast including age, respondents who had a Listeners gender, ethnicity, chance to take the and region. survey were nationally representative. Please contact us if you are interested in learning about additional or custom analyses. MRC Data U.S. Podcast 360 2021 2 Copyright © 2019 The The Nielsen Copyright MRC © 2019 Company DataLLC. Confidential (US), and proprietary. not distribute.Do Key Audiences The following audiences are explored throughout the report. GEN POP MUSIC LISTENERS PODCAST LISTENERS AUDIO USERS U.S. General Population Ages Listened to music in the past Listened to podcasts in the Listened to music, podcasts, 13+ 12 months (audio or video) past 12 months audiobooks, radio, and/or meditation mindfulness in the past 12 months GEN Z MILLENNIALS GEN X BOOMERS / SILENT GEN Born 1997-2007 Born 1981-1996 Born 1965-1980 Born before 1965 (Ages 13-23) (Ages 24-39) (Ages 40-55) (Ages 56+) MRC Data U.S. Podcast 360 2021 4 Copyright © 2019 The The Nielsen Copyright MRC © 2019 Company DataLLC. Confidential (US), and proprietary.
    [Show full text]