Treasa Dunworth ORCID Identifier: Orcid.Org/ 0000-0001-6977-1215

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Treasa Dunworth ORCID Identifier: Orcid.Org/ 0000-0001-6977-1215 ‘WHAT’S PAST IS PROLOGUE’: HUMANITARIAN DISARMAMENT FROM ST PETERSBURG TO NEW YORK Treasa Dunworth ORCID Identifier: orcid.org/ 0000-0001-6977-1215 April 2019 Melbourne Law School University of Melbourne Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy ABSTRACT In the past twenty years, the international community has agreed to bans on anti- personnel landmines, on cluster munitions and on nuclear weapons. In all these cases, claims of humanitarianism ⎯ understood here as a concern with human suffering ⎯ have taken centre-stage as the explanation for this success. Disarmament, it is said, is being driven now by ideas of human suffering rather than by national security perspectives. The central claim of this thesis is that the humanitarian framing of arms control and disarmament is not a novel development, but rather represents a re- emergence of a much older and long-standing sensibility of humanitarianism in disarmament discourse. In other words, the thesis rejects the ‘big bang’ theory that presents the Anti-Personnel Landmines Convention in 1997 as a creation moment: as a paradigm shift from an older, traditional state-centric approach towards a more progressive, humanitarian approach. In challenging the creation myth of humanitarian disarmament, the aim is not to quibble about starting points. Rather, the challenge makes space for a more careful consideration of the meaning of ‘humanitarianism’ and ‘humanitarian disarmament’ including an acknowledgement of humanitarianism’s politics and complexities. The thesis argues that humanitarianism’s appeal lies in part at least in the ideal of an apolitical framework for disarmament ⎯ humanitarianism appears to be cleansed of all politics and thus has a moral simplicity. However, the thesis shows that far from being apolitical, humanitarianism generally, and humanitarian disarmament in particular, carry with them their own political agendas. Challenging the creation myth also allows the complex reality of humanitarian disarmament to emerge. The thesis reveals how there has not been a steady, progressive infusion of humanitarian ideals into the thinking about and practice of arms control. Rather, there have been periods when humanitarianism seemed to have greater traction, only to be side-lined. Further, taking a broad view, it can be seen that over time, there have been many failures as well as successes. Finally, this longer story paves the way for attention to be paid to other discourses that emerged (particularly during the Cold War) and were an important part of the overall disarmament discourse, but have been neglected. These include a human rights framework, a human security analysis, and ideas based on democracy. The thesis concludes that while humanitarianism has been an important feature of disarmament discourse historically, it does not have the radical potential that these other relatively neglected discourses offer, notwithstanding humanitarian disarmament’s more recent flourishing. ii DECLARATION I make the following declarations: i. The thesis comprises only my original work towards the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ii. Due acknowledgement has been made in the text of this thesis to all other material used. iii. The thesis is fewer than 100,000 words in length, exclusive of the bibliography. Treasa Dunworth iii PREFACE During the course of writing this thesis, I have had one book chapter accepted for publication with Cambridge University Press which is based on some of the work in Chapters 4 and 5. The book chapter is entitled ‘The Cold War History of the Landmines Convention’ and will appear in Matthew Craven, Sundhya Pahuja and Gerry Simpson (eds) International Law and the Cold War (Cambridge University Press, 2019). I intend to publish a book provisionally entitled Understanding Humanitarian Disarmament with Cambridge University Press, which is due to appear later in 2019 and is substantially based on the work in this thesis. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I owe an enormous debt of gratitude to my supervision team: Professor Tim McCormack, Professor Tania Voon, and Dr Robert Mathews. In different ways, each was a major source of support. Tim, for being absolutely persuaded that there was a law PhD on a disarmament topic, easing my way through the application process and facilitating me spending time at Melbourne with my family. Tania, whose attention to detail, clarity of thought and expression improved every chapter and the articulation of every idea, and whose empathy and kindness helped me persevere. Finally, I could not have asked for a more expert, knowledgeable and generous person than Bob when it came to the intricacies of disarmament history and practice. His lifetime of service to the cause of disarmament is inspiring, and I am humbled by, and grateful for, his generosity in sharing his expertise. I am also grateful to many others who provided me with feedback, sources, ideas, information and challenges over the years as I worked on this project: Maartje Abbenhuis, Dylan Asafo, John Borrie, Lyndon Burford, John Burroughs, Tim Caughley, Hilary Charlesworth, Kate Dewes, Rob Green, Dell Higgie, Anna Hood, Natalia Jevglevskaja, Ken Keith, Frank Kirwan, Dino Kritsiotis, Kobi Leins, Rain Liivoja, Campbell McLachlan, Janet McLean, Andrew Mitchell, Manfred Nowak, Anne Orford, Dianne Otto, Josh Paine, Sundhya Pahuja, Daniel Rietiker, Kevin Riordan, Richard Slade, Lucy Stewart, Lisa Tabassi, Andrew Webster and David Williams. I offer heartfelt thanks to all the wonderful librarians who helped me along the way: in particular to Stephanie Carr and Tracey Thomas. Like all of us who work within the University system, I am indebted to our librarians for their expertise and professionalism. I cherished the support and friendship of the ‘Level 9 team’ during my stints at Melbourne Law School: Maddy Chiam, Monique Cormier, Alison Duxbury, Anna Hood, Cathy Hutton, Kobi Leins and Rain Liivoja. In 1995 I started work as a Researcher for the Harvard Sussex Program on Arms Control and Arms Limitation, at the time led by Julian Perry Robinson (at Sussex) and Mathew Meselson (at Harvard). Although I did not realise it at the time, it was here that the seeds of this project were planted. It is fitting therefore that both Julian and Matt appear in the following pages: Matt, then a young academic, led a Commission to enquire into the effects of use of herbicides by the United States during the Vietnam War (Chapter 4, Part II B); Julian represented the World Health Organization at the series of meetings convened as part of the ‘Human Rights in Armed Conflict’ initiative through the 1970s which was an important humanitarian campaign responding to the human suffering engendered by the Vietnam War (Chapter 4, Part III B). Matt and Julian stand as testament to the long history of the quest for disarmament propelled by a humanitarian sensibility ⎯ even if neither of them would express it like that. I was privileged to work for them and I am grateful to both of them for the many opportunities they afforded me. From that period of my professional life, I also acknowledge and thank Sergei Batsanov, Daniel Feakes, Walter Krutzsch, Kathleen Lawand, Lisa Tabassi and Anil v Wadhwa. Conversations and discussions with all of them raised questions for me that I have only started to explore in this project. Outside of my professional life, I owe many thanks: to Lisa Tremewan who first inspired me to study law and from whom I learnt about the need to acknowledge law’s limitations, even as we strive to make real its possibilities; to Dympna, Eilish, and Moira who encouraged their little sister every step of the way (and long before I embarked on this project); to Janet and Steven and all of my extended family in New Zealand and elsewhere, for forgiving (I hope!) my absences, silences and neglect. I dedicate this thesis to my mother-in-law, Ngaire Wilkinson, who by virtue of being from a different generation and a different time, did not have my opportunities, but who ensured that I was able to embrace those that came my way. Finally, I am eternally grateful to Marty for his love and support. He has been my steadfast champion, has accepted and facilitated my absences whether physical or otherwise, and has been waiting patiently for me to return. vi TABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS AEC Atomic Energy Commission (United Nations) Amended Protocol II Amended Protocol on the Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Mines, Booby-Traps and Other Devices 1995 AP I Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts 1977 AP II Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non International Armed Conflicts 1977 APLM Anti-personnel landmine APLM Convention Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti- Personnel Mines and on their Destruction 1997 CCA Commission for Conventional Armaments (United Nations) CCM Convention on Cluster Munitions 2008 CCW Convention on the Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons which may be deemed to be Excessively Injurious or to have Indiscriminate Effects 1980 CD Conference on Disarmament Charter Charter of the United Nations 1945 Covenant Covenant of the League of Nations 1920 CTBT Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty 1996 CWC Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and
Recommended publications
  • Corn Reproductive Structures
    Corn Reproductive Structures Genetics Unit Transparency 2.3 ©2008 The Regents of the University of California Creating a Punnett Square Genetics Unit Transparency 2.4 ©2008 The Regents of the University of California Case Study Summary Sheet Case Study Type of Benefits Risks and concerns Remaining questions Genetic Modification Genetics Unit Transparency 4.1 ©2008 The Regents of the University of California Class Data for Rice Breeding Simulation aromatic, non-aromatic, aromatic, non-aromatic ,flood-tolear nt flood-tolerant flood-intolerant flood-intolerant AAFF AAFf AaFF AaFf aaFF aaFf AAff Aaff aaff Group 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Genetics Unit Transparency 5.1 ©2008 The Regents of the University of California Three Types of Cells Genetics Unit Transparency 6.1 ©2008 The Regents of the University of California DNA base percentages in a variety of organisms Source of A T G C DNA Human 31.0% 31.5% 19.1% 18.4% Mouse 29.1% 29.0% 21.1% 21.1% Frog 26.3% 26.4% 23.5% 23.8% Fruit fly 27.3% 27.6% 22.5% 22.5% Corn 25.6% 25.3% 24.5% 24.6% E. coli 24.6% 24.3% 25.5% 25.6% Genetics Unit Transparency 7.1 ©2008 The Regents of the University of California Matthew Meselson and Franklin Stahl’s Experiment to Investigate DNA Replication First: Scientists James Watson and Francis Crick propose a method of semi-conservative replication in their paper on the structure of DNA. However, they have no data to support their hypothesis. Next: Matthew Meselson and Franklin Stahl use the procedure that follows to investigate DNA created by the process of DNA Replication.
    [Show full text]
  • JESSICA L. MARK WELCH Assistant Research Scientist Josephine Bay
    JESSICA L. MARK WELCH Assistant Research Scientist Josephine Bay Paul Center, Marine Biological Laboratory 7 MBL Street, Woods Hole, MA 02543 Telephone (508) 289-7180, e-mail [email protected] EDUCATION: B.A. magna cum laude, Harvard and Radcliffe Colleges, Biology, 1989 Graduate work, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany, Chemistry and Biology, 1990-1992 Advisor: Walter Sudhaus Ph.D., Harvard University Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Biology, 2001 Advisor: Matthew Meselson. Dissertation topic: Cytological Evidence for the Absence of Meiosis in Bdelloid Rotifers. Postdoctoral training, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Molecular Biology 2001-2006 part-time 2006-2009 full-time Advisors: Matthew Meselson and Gary Borisy PROFESSIONAL APPOINTMENTS: 1989 – 1990 Research Assistant, Environmental Law Institute, Washington, DC 2009 – present Assistant Research Scientist, Josephine Bay Paul Center for Comparative Molecular Biology and Evolution, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA. PUBLICATIONS: Valm, Alex M., Jessica L. Mark Welch, and Gary G. Borisy (2012). CLASI-FISH: Principles of Combinatorial Labeling and Spectral Imaging. Systematic and Applied Microbiology 2012 Apr 21 (Epub ahead of print). PMCID: PMC3407316. Sukenik, Assaf, Ruth N. Kaplan-Levy, Jessica Mark Welch, and Anton Post (2011). Massive multiplication of genome and ribosomes in dormant cells (akinetes) of Aphanizomenon ovalisporum (Cyanobacteria). The ISME Journal 2011.128 (epub ahead of print, October 6, 2011). Valm, Alex M., Jessica L. Mark Welch, Christopher W. Rieken, Yuko Hasegawa, Mitchell L. Sogin, Rudolf Oldenbourg, Floyd E. Dewhirst, and Gary G. Borisy (2011). Systems-level analysis of microbial community organization through combinatorial labeling and spectral imaging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 108: 4152-4157.
    [Show full text]
  • Matthew Meselson and Federal Policy on Chemical and Biological Warfare
    142 The People's Science Advisora-Can Outsiders Be Ef(ectivef . D .__ 30 1969 p 14· January 4, 1970, p. 29; February 2, 53. New York T1me1, ecem..... • ' • ' CHAPTER 11. 1970,p.27. 35 54 New York Timei,June 18, 1970, p. • 0 6 9 55: Time, April 12, 1971, P· 45;New YorkNT::J~~~~! i?e,i!~s ·in· Pepper Fields," 56. Robert Gillette, "DDT: lts Days ue u er ' Seien« 176 (1972): 1313. 0 72-1548 etc. (6 suits). December 18, 197~. " Matthew Meselson and the 51. EDF et. al v. EPA etc., D.C. Clorar.. p. Result of lnsect Resistance, New Chemu:als, 58. "Decreasing Use of Organoch mes as 9 Chemical and Engineering N;,wsk, AT~~ No• ~:~~·{1\911, Section IV, P· 13. 59. Quoted in the New • or rme-, • United States Policy on 60. Jbid. 61. Jbid. ered •• 1314 62. Gillette, "DDT: lts Days Are Numb ••AiXrin and Dieldrin," Environment, October 63. See, for example, tbarles F. Wurstel, Chemical and 1971, p. 33. • . .cals re ·stered ror use in the United States. 64. In 1969 there were 900 pestic:'dal c~ on';.e1ticide111nd Their Relationship to See, c.g., thc Report of the SeaetflTY 'Com n Biological Warfare Envi1onmento1Health, p. 46. Mattbew Meselson is a sligbt, soft-spoken professor of biochemistry at Harvard wbo often seems to be occupying the calm at the center of a burricane of activity. The scene wbicb greeted one of the authors on an aftemoon visit to bis laboratory during the spring of 1973 was typical: Meselson's graduate students bad congregated for wine, cheese, discussion, and laughter in a room next to bis office.
    [Show full text]
  • Allele Sharing and Evidence for Sexuality in a Mitochondrial Clade of Bdelloid Rotifers
    HIGHLIGHTED ARTICLE GENETICS | INVESTIGATION Allele Sharing and Evidence for Sexuality in a Mitochondrial Clade of Bdelloid Rotifers Ana Signorovitch,* Jae Hur,*,† Eugene Gladyshev,* and Matthew Meselson*,‡,1 *Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, †Department of Biology, Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, California 91711, and ‡Josephine Bay Paul Center, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543 ORCID IDs: 0000-0003-1446-2305 (J.H.); 0000-0002-4074-4966 (E.G.); 0000-0002-9827-2682 (M.M.) ABSTRACT Rotifers of Class Bdelloidea are common freshwater invertebrates of ancient origin whose apparent asexuality has posed a challenge to the view that sexual reproduction is essential for long-term evolutionary success in eukaryotes and to hypotheses for the advantage of sex. The possibility nevertheless exists that bdelloids reproduce sexually under unknown or inadequately investigated conditions. Although certain methods of population genetics offer definitive means for detecting infrequent or atypical sex, they have not previously been applied to bdelloid rotifers. We conducted such a test with bdelloids belonging to a mitochondrial clade of Macrotrachela quadricornifera. This revealed a striking pattern of allele sharing consistent with sexual reproduction and with meiosis of an atypical sort, in which segregation occurs without requiring homologous chromosome pairs. KEYWORDS clonal erosion; cyclic parthenogenesis; meiosis; monogonont; Oenothera DELLOID rotifers are minute freshwater invertebrates com- families and hundreds of morphospecies, their ancient origin is Bmonly found in lakes, streams, and ponds and in ephem- indicated by the considerable synonymous sequence divergence erally aquatic environments such as rock pools and the water between families and by the finding of bdelloid remains in 35- to films on moss and lichens where they are able to survive because 40-million year old amber (Mark Welch et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Matthew Stanley Meselson (1930– ) [1]
    Published on The Embryo Project Encyclopedia (https://embryo.asu.edu) Matthew Stanley Meselson (1930– ) [1] By: Hernandez, Victoria Keywords: semiconservative replication [2] Matthew Stanley Meselson conducted DNA and RNA research in the US during the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. He also influenced US policy regarding the use of chemical and biological weapons. Meselson and his colleague Franklin Stahl demonstrated that DNA replication is semi-conservative. Semi-conservative replication means that every newly replicated DNA double helix, which consists of two individual DNA strands wound together, contains one strand that was conserved from a parent double helix and that served as a template for the other strand. Meselson's work enabled researchers to better explain and control cellular development by showing how DNA are copied when a cell divides and interpreted when a cell makes proteins. Meselson was born in Denver, Colorado, to Ann and Hyman Meselson on 24 May 1930. At the age of two, Meselson and his family moved to Los Angeles, California, where he grew up as an only child. According to Meselson, even as a boy he wanted to be a scientist. Meselson built his own chemistry lab in the garage of his home using a chemistry set given to him by his uncle Morris. According to Frederic Lawrence Holmes, a historian of science, Meselson said that his interest in chemistry continued to develop in high school because his chemistry teacher, Elizabeth Butcher, challenged him. Meselson also claimed that he was fascinated by the question of how life originated. He said that he wondered whether electricity was the source of life, and he imagined himself as an electrochemist discovering the means to create life.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Is DNA Double Stranded? the Discovery of DNA Excision Repair Mechanisms
    | PERSPECTIVES Why Is DNA Double Stranded? The Discovery of DNA Excision Repair Mechanisms Bernard S. Strauss1 Department of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, The University of Chicago, Illinois 60637 ORCID ID: 0000-0001-7548-6461 (B.S.S.) ABSTRACT The persistence of hereditary traits over many generations testifies to the stability of the genetic material. Although the Watson–Crick structure for DNA provided a simple and elegant mechanism for replication, some elementary calculations implied that mistakes due to tautomeric shifts would introduce too many errors to permit this stability. It seemed evident that some additional mechanism(s) to correct such errors must be required. This essay traces the early development of our understanding of such mech- anisms. Their key feature is the cutting out of a section of the strand of DNA in which the errors or damage resided, and its replacement by a localized synthesis using the undamaged strand as a template. To the surprise of some of the founders of molecular biology, this understanding derives in large part from studies in radiation biology, a field then considered by many to be irrelevant to studies of gene structure and function. Furthermore, genetic studies suggesting mechanisms of mismatch correction were ignored for almost a decade by biochemists unacquainted or uneasy with the power of such analysis. The collective body of results shows that the double-stranded structure of DNA is critical not only for replication but also as a scaffold for the correction of errors and the removal of damage to DNA. As additional discoveries were made, it became clear that the mechanisms for the repair of damage were involved not only in maintaining the stability of the genetic material but also in a variety of biological phenomena for increasing diversity, from genetic recombination to the immune response.
    [Show full text]
  • Meselson, Stahl, and the Replication of DNA: a History of "The Most Beautiful
    © 2002 by The International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY EDUCATION Printed in U.S.A. Vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 431–435, 2002 Book Reviews Enzyme Kinetics: Principles and Methods (1st English an effort to reconstruct the history of “The Most Beautiful Ed.; translation of 3rd German Ed.) Experiment in Biology” (this quote is attributed to John Bisswanger, H. (Bubenheim, L., translator); Wiley-VCH, Cairns as reported in Horace Judson’s Eighth Day of Cre- Weinheim, 2002, 255 pp. ϩ CD-ROM, ISBN 3-527- ation). The trio examined extant records, notes from 30343-X, $95.00. Meselson’s workbook, centrifuge logs, and photographs containing the results of centrifugation experiments (many This book on enzyme kinetics takes what is, to my of which are reproduced in the book). Holmes also exam- knowledge, a unique approach to the discipline. The first ined periodic reports written for the California Institute of part is a thorough discussion of substrate binding, inde- Technology (Caltech) and the National Association for In- pendent of the enzymatic reaction, and deals with the fantile Paralysis; these were generally the work of Stahl. phenomena of multiple binding sites, both independent Other sources include discussions with Gunther Stent, and interacting. There is detailed graphical representation John Cairns, James D. Watson, and Howard Schachman. of the various equations showing what would be expected As an historian of science, Holmes sought the help of for weak and strong interactions and cooperativity, both these experts to learn the scientific principles involved. His positive and negative. explanations are thorough, and his sources are cited in The second part is the most traditional with detailed notes that accompany each chapter.
    [Show full text]
  • The Centenary of Janssens's Chiasmatype Theory
    PERSPECTIVES The Centenary of Janssens’s Chiasmatype Theory Romain Koszul,*,†,1 Matthew Meselson,‡ Karine Van Doninck,§ Jean Vandenhaute,** and Denise Zickler††,1 *Institut Pasteur, Group Spatial Regulation of Genomes, Department of Genomes and Genetics, F-75015 Paris, France, †2 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 3525, F-75015 Paris, France, ‡Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, §Université de Namur, Facultés universitaires Notre-Dame de la Paix (FUNDP), Unité de Recherche en Biologie des Organismes, B5000 Namur, Belgium, **Université de Namur, FUNDP, Unité de Recherche en Biologie Moléculaire et Département Sciences, Philosophies et Sociétés, B5000 Namur, Belgium, and ††Institut de Génétique et Microbiologie, UMR 8621, Université Paris-Sud, 91405 Orsay, France ABSTRACT The segregation and random assortment of characters observed by Mendel have their basis in the behavior of chromosomes in meiosis. But showing this actually to be the case requires a correct understanding of the meiotic behavior of chromosomes. This was achieved only gradually, over several decades, with much dispute and confusion along the way. One crucial step in the understanding of meiosis was provided in 1909 by Frans Alfons Janssens who published in La Cellule an article entitled “La théorie de la Chiasmatypie. Nouvelle interprétation des cinèses de maturation,” which contains the first description of the chiasma structure. He observed that, of the four chromatids present at the connection sites (chiasmata sites) at diplotene or anaphase of the first meiotic division, two crossed each other and two did not. He therefore postulated that the maternal and paternal chromatids that crossed penetrated the other until they broke and rejoined in maternal and paternal segments new ways; the other two chromatids remained free and thus intact.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline Code Dnai Site Guide
    DNAi Site Guide 1 DNAi Site Guide Timeline Pre 1920’s Johann Gregor Mendel, Friedrich Miescher, Carl Erich Correns, Hugo De Vries, Erich Von Tschermak- Seysenegg, Thomas Hunt Morgan 1920-49 Hermann Muller, Barbara McClintock, George Wells Beadle, Edward Lawrie Tatum, Joshua Lederberg, Oswald Theodore Avery 1950-54 Erwin Chargaff, Rosalind Elsie Franklin, Martha Chase, Alfred Day Hershey, Linus Pauling, James Dewey Watson, Francis Harry Compton Crick, Seymour Benzer 1955-59 Francis Harry Compton Crick, Paul Charles Zamecnik, Mahlon Hoagland, Matthew Stanley Meselson, Franklin William Stahl, Arthur Kornberg 1960’s Sydney Brenner, Marshall Warren Nirenberg, François Jacob, Jacques Lucien Monod, Roy John Britten 1970’s David Baltimore, Howard Martin Temin, Stanley Norman Cohen, Herbert W. Boyer, Richard John Roberts, Phillip Allen Sharp, Roger Kornberg, Frederick Sanger 1980’s Christiane Nüsslein-Volhard, Eric Francis Wieschaus, Kary Mullis, Thomas Robert Cech, Sidney Altman, Mario Renato Capecchi 1990-2000 Mary-Claire King, Stephen P.A. Fodor, Patrick Henry Brown, John Craig Venter Francis Collins, John Sulston Code Finding the structure Problem What is the structure of DNA? DNAi Site Guide 2 Players Erwin Chargaff, Rosalind Franklin, Linus Pauling, James Watson and Francis Crick, Maurice Wilkins Pieces of the puzzle Wilkins' X-ray, Pauling's triple helix, Franklin's X-ray, Watson's base pairing, Chargaff's ratios Putting it together DNA is a double-stranded helix. Copying the code Problem How is DNA copied? Players James Watson and Francis Crick, Sydney Brenner, François Jacob, Matthew Meselson, Arthur Kornberg Pieces of the puzzle The Central Dogma, Semi-conservative replication Models of DNA replication, The RNA experiment, DNA synthesis Putting it together DNA is used as a template for copying information.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE CAMPINAS INSTITUTO DE BIOLOGIA SIMONE GARCIA SILVA DNA: DA DESCOBERTA AOS TRANSGÊNICOS Desenvolviment
    UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE CAMPINAS INSTITUTO DE BIOLOGIA SIMONE GARCIA SILVA DNA: DA DESCOBERTA AOS TRANSGÊNICOS Desenvolvimento de sequência didática e jogo educativo para alunos do ensino médio público do Estado de São Paulo CAMPINAS – SP 2020 SIMONE GARCIA SILVA DNA: DA DESCOBERTA AOS TRANSGÊNICOS Desenvolvimento de sequência didática e jogo educativo para alunos do ensino médio público do Estado de São Paulo Dissertação apresentada ao instituto de Biologia da Universidade Estadual de Campinas, como parte dos requisitos exigidos para obtenção do título de Mestra em Ensino de Biologia, na área de Ensino de Biologia Orientador: Prof. Dr. Marcelo Menossi Teixeira ESTE ARQUIVO DIGITAL CORRESPONDE À VERSÃO FINAL DA DISSERTAÇÃO DEFENDIDA PELA ALUNA SIMONE GARCIA SILVA E ORIENTADA PELO PROF. DR. MARCELO MENOSSI TEIXEIRA. CAMPINAS – SP 2020 Ficha catalográfica Universidade Estadual de Campinas Biblioteca do Instituto de Biologia Mara Janaina de Oliveira - CRB 8/6972 Silva, Simone Garcia, 1982- Si38d Dna : da descoberta aos transgênicos : desenvolvimento de sequência didática e jogo educativo para alunos do ensino médio público do estado de São Paulo / Simone Garcia Silva. – Campinas, SP : [s.n.], 2020. Orientador: Marcelo Menossi Teixeira. Dissertação (mestrado profissional) – Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Biologia. 1. Genética - Estudo e ensino. 2. Sequência didática. 3. Jogos educativos. I. Menossi, Marcelo, 1968-. II. Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Instituto de Biologia. III. Título. Informações para Biblioteca Digital
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating DNA Replication”
    Sample student results, Student Sheet 8.1, “Investigating DNA Replication” p. 100 Science and Global Issues (SGI) Genetics: Feeding the World Matthew Meselson and Franklin Stahl’s Experiment to Investigate DNA Replication First: Scientists James Watson and Francis Crick propose a method of semi-conservative replication in their paper on the structure of DNA. However, they have no data to support their hypothesis. Next: Matthew Meselson and Franklin Stahl use the procedure that follows to investigate DNA created by the process of DNA Replication. Procedure 1. Place bacteria, Escherichia coli (E. coli) in a solution of “heavy” nitrogen. 2. Leave the E. coli in the “heavy” nitrogen solution until all DNA nucleotides, and all DNA strands, are made of “heavy” nitrogen. This is Generation Zero. 3. Isolate the DNA from the E. coli. 4. Place “heavy” DNA in a solution with the same density as DNA. Genetics Transparency 8.1a ©2008 The Regents of the University of California p. 107 Science and Global Issues (SGI) Genetics: Feeding the World 5. Run “heavy” DNA solution on a centrifuge. A band of “heavy” DNA forms in the test tube. 6. Transfer some of the E. coli with “heavy” DNA into a solution of “light” DNA. 7. Allow the E. coli to reproduce for 20 minutes (the reproduction time of E. coli). 8. Place E. coli in the solution and run the tube on a centrifuge. 9. Analyze the bands of DNA that form. 10. Repeat for 3 rounds of Replication. 11. Compare the bands that form for each round of replication. Genetics Transparency 8.1b ©2008 The Regents of the University of California p.
    [Show full text]
  • Cytogenetic Evidence for Asexual Evolution of Bdelloid Rotifers
    Cytogenetic evidence for asexual evolution of bdelloid rotifers Jessica L. Mark Welch*†, David B. Mark Welch*, and Matthew Meselson*‡ *Josephine Bay Paul Center for Comparative Molecular Biology and Evolution, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA 02543; and ‡Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138 Contributed by Matthew Meselson, November 19, 2003 DNA sequencing has shown individual bdelloid rotifer genomes to Methods contain two or more diverged copies of every gene examined and Cosmid Library and Probes. All rotifers and probes were derived has revealed no closely similar copies. These and other findings are from a line propagated in our laboratory from a single egg. consistent with long-term asexual evolution of bdelloids. It is not Rotifers were grown and cleaned as described (10) and ground entirely ruled out, however, that bdelloid genomes consist of in liquid nitrogen. High-molecular-weight DNA was prepared previously undetected pairs of sequences so similar as to be and partially digested with Sau3AI in agarose substantially identical over the regions sequenced, as might result if bdelloids following Sambrook et al. (11). DNA larger than 12 kb was were highly inbred sexual diploids or polyploids. Here, we employ selected by agarose gel electrophoresis, recovered by treatment fluorescent in situ hybridization with cosmid probes to determine with agarase and ethanol precipitation, dephosphorylated with the copy number and chromosomal distribution of the heat shock shrimp alkaline phosphatase (USB), ligated into the SuperCos gene hsp82 and adjacent sequences in the bdelloid Philodina vector (Stratagene), and packaged in GigaPack III XL extracts roseola. We conclude that the four copies identified by sequencing (Stratagene).
    [Show full text]