LAMINATED TIMBER ARCHITECTURE GLULAM Glulam: Engineered Strength
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Glued-Laminated Timber Bridges
Glued-Laminated Timber Bridges Glulam design s are the most commonly used modern timber bridge designs The first glulam bridges were built in the mid-1940's. Since that time, they have become the most common type of timber bridge in both single and multi-span con figurations. Glulam beam bridges are completely prefabricated in modular compo nents and are treat ed with preservatives Wea llng surlac e ,r tsee Chapter 11) after fabrication. When prop erly designed , and fabricated, no field cutting or boring is required, resulting in a service life of 50 !!? Q) years or more. '§ "'" c: 0" Q) c: Q) GLULAM BEAM SYSTEMS Transverse bracing 3 c:0> OJ D '§ ' .c: c: Glulam beam bridges consist of a U Q) ' ~ .c: series of transverse glulam deck panels >- 3 '"3 D'" supported on straight or slightly curved 'o ;; o '"0 beams (Figure 1). They are the most ([ .9. practical for clear spans of 20 to 100 feet and are widely used on all size roads and highways. Glulam has proved to be an ex ceUent material for beam bridges because Cutaway plan members are available in a range of sizes and grades and are easily adapt able to a modular or systems concept of design and Traffi c rail I (see Chapter 10) construction. Although glulam can be r Curb r Glulam deck custom fabricated in many shapes and sizes, the most economical structure uses - - - - Bearin g - - - - - -J~--- ~ -. I standardized components in a repet itious ar ~ ' """"" - rangement, an approach that is particularly b e a m ~ Glu lam Substruct ure ~ adaptable to bridges. -
Truss Deflection
Truss Deflection Truss deflection may be something you do not give much thought to when designing trusses. Unfortunately, meeting the code permitted deflection ratio does not always guarantee satisfactory performance. Regardless of what the codes say, most people regard large levels of deflection as a sign of structural deficiency. Paying attention to deflection may be the key to whether your customer is satisfied with you as a supplier and continues to buy your products. Deflection of a truss is generally based on the amount of vertical movement from its original position due to the loads applied to the members. The amount of deflection depends on the span and stiffness of the members, and the magnitude of the loads applied. Codes provide the maximum allowable deflection limits for floor and roof trusses, which is based solely on the truss span. Generally, for roof trusses, the deflection in inches due to live load cannot exceed the span in inches divided by 240 (L/240) and due to total load L/180. For floor trusses, the deflection in inches due to live load cannot exceed the span in inches divided by 360 (L/360) and due to total load L/240. To meet code deflection criteria, a 40-foot span roof truss could have live load deflection 2 inches, which does not ensure satisfactory performance. MiTek engineers recommend using the deflection limits listed below. Page 1 of 5 10 /12 /20 20 Truss Deflection Roof Trusses should use the following settings: In MiTek 20/20 Engineering go to Setup – Job – Design Info – Deflection: In Structure with Truss Design go to File – Setup – Job Properties - Job Settings – Design – Building Code Settings: Please note the settings for cantilever and overhang are half that of the main span. -
Glulam Design Properties and Layup Combinations
GLULAM DESIGN PROPERTIES AND LAYUP COMBINATIONS ENGINEERED WOOD SYSTEMS WOOD The Miracle Material™ Wood is the right choice for a host of construction applications. It is the earth’s natural, energy efficient and renewable building material. Engineered wood is a better use of wood. The miracle in today’s wood products is that they make more efficient use of the wood fiber resource to make stronger plywood, oriented strand board, I-joists, glued laminated timbers, and laminated veneer lumber. That’s good for the environment, and good for designers seeking strong, efficient, and striking building design. A few facts about wood. I We’re not running out of trees. One-third of the United States land base – 731 million acres – is covered by forests. About two-thirds of that 731 million acres is suitable for repeated planting and harvesting of timber. But only about half of the land suitable for growing timber is open to logging. Most of that harvestable acreage also is open to other uses, such as camping, hiking, and hunting. Forests fully cover one-half of Canada’s land mass. Of this forestland, nearly half is considered productive, or capable of producing timber on a sustained yield basis. Canada has the highest per capita accumulation of protected natural areas in the world – areas including national and provincial parks. I We’re growing more wood every day. American landowners plant more than two billion trees every year. In addition, millions of trees seed naturally. The forest products industry, which comprises about 15 percent of forestland ownership, is responsible for 41 percent of replanted forest acreage. -
North American Glued Laminated Timber American Wood Council Canadian Wood Council
NORTH AMERICAN GLUED LAMINATED TIMBER AMERICAN WOOD COUNCIL CANADIAN WOOD COUNCIL The American Wood Council (AWC) and the Canadian Wood Council (CWC) are pleased to present this Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) for North American Glued Laminated Timber (glulam). The EPD includes Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) results for all processes up to the point that glulam is packaged and ready for shipment at the manufacturing gate. The underlying LCA and the EPD were developed in compliance with ISO 14025:2006 and ISO 21930:2017 and have been verified under the UL Environment EPD program. The AWC and CWC represent wood product manufacturers across North America. The North American forest product industry is a global leader of sustainably sourced wood products. This EPD reflects years of research and numerous sustainability initiatives on behalf of our members to continually improve the environmental footprint of North American wood products. We are pleased to present this document to show our progress. Please follow our sustainability initiatives at www.awc.org and www.cwc.ca. North American Glued Laminated Timber North American Structural and Architectural Wood Products According to ISO 14025, EN 15804, and ISO 21930:2017 EPD PROGRAM AND PROGRAM OPERATOR UL Environment https://www.ul.com/ NAME, ADDRESS, LOGO, AND WEBSITE 333 Pfingsten Road Northbrook, IL 60611 https://spot.ul.com/ GENERAL PROGRAM INSTRUCTIONS General Program Instructions v.2.4 July 2018 AND VERSION NUMBER American Wood Council DECLARATION HOLDER Canadian Wood Council DECLARATION NUMBER 4788424634.104.1 DECLARED PRODUCT & North American Glued Laminated Timber, FUNCTIONAL UNIT OR DECLARED UNIT 1 m3 of glulam produced in North America (US and CA) ISO 21930:2017 Sustainability in Building Construction — Environmental Declaration of Building Products. -
Truss Terminology
TRUSS TERMINOLOGY BEARING WIDTH The width dimension of the member OVERHANG The extension of the top chord beyond the providing support for the truss (usually 3 1/2” or 5 1/2”). heel joint. Bearing must occur at a truss joint location. PANEL The chord segment between two adjacent joints. CANTILEVER That structural portion of a truss which extends PANEL POINT The point of intersection of a chord with the beyond the support. The cantilever dimension is measured web or webs. from the outside face of the support to the heel joint. Note that the cantilever is different from the overhang. PEAK Highest point on a truss where the sloped top chords meet. CAMBER An upward vertical displacement built into a truss bottom chord to compensate for defl ection due to dead load. PLATE Either horizontal 2x member at the top of a stud wall offering bearing for trusses or a shortened form of connector CHORDS The outer members of a truss that defi ne the plate, depending on usage of the word. envelope or shape. PLUMB CUT Top chord cut to provide for vertical (plumb) TOP CHORD An inclined or horizontal member that establishes installation of fascia. the upper edge of a truss. This member is subjected to compressive and bending stresses. SCARF CUT For pitched trusses only – the sloping cut of upper portion of the bottom chord at the heel joint. BOTTOM CHORD The horizontal (and inclined, ie. scissor trusses) member defi ning the lower edge of a truss, carrying SLOPE (PITCH) The units of horizontal run, in one unit of ceiling loads where applicable. -
Designing for Durability CONTINUING EDUCATION Strategies for Achieving Maximum Durability with Wood-Frame Construction Sponsored by Rethink Wood
EDUCATIONAL-ADVERTISEMENT Designing for Durability EDUCATION CONTINUING Strategies for achieving maximum durability with wood-frame construction Sponsored by reThink Wood rchitects specify wood for many Examples of wood buildings that have (glulam), cross laminated timber (CLT), and reasons, including cost, ease and stood for centuries exist all over the world, nail-laminated timber, along with a variety A efficiency of construction, design including the Horyu-ji temple in Ikaruga, of structural composite lumber products, are versatility, and sustainability—as well as Japan, built in the eighth century, stave enabling increased dimensional stability and its beauty and the innate appeal of nature churches in Norway, including one in Urnes strength, and greater long-span capabilities. and natural materials. Innovative new built in 1150, and many more. Today, wood These innovations are leading to taller, technologies and building systems are also is being used in a wider range of buildings highly innovative wood buildings. Examples leading to the increased use of wood as a than would have been possible even 20 years include (among others) a 10-story CLT structural material, not only in houses, ago. Next-generation lumber and mass timber apartment building in Australia, a 14-story schools, and other traditional applications, products, such as glue-laminated timber timber-frame apartment in Norway, but in larger, taller, and more visionary wood buildings. But even as the use of wood is expanding, one significant characteristic of wood buildings is often underestimated: their durability. Misperceptions still exist that buildings made of materials such as concrete or steel last longer than buildings made of wood. -
A Vision for Forest Products Extension in Wisconsin
Wisconsin’s Forest Industry: Rooted in our Lives Rooted in our Economy Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Forestry Division, Forest Products Services Wisconsin forest industry overview Industry sectors and trends Emerging markets Part I: Forest Industry Overview Wisconsin’s forest industry ~1,200 establishments Over 60,000 jobs $24.1 billion in goods and services annually Approximately 14% of manufacturing jobs Wisconsin’s forest industry (cont’d) Exports total over $2.2 billion annually Top employer in 10 counties Supports employment of over 111,000 additional jobs Why should we care? . The health of Wisconsin’s economy depends upon the health of Wisconsin’s forest industry . The health of Wisconsin’s forests depends upon the health of Wisconsin’s forest industry Why should we care? . We as consumers depend on forests! Flooring Baseball bats Houses Ice cream thickener Lumber Garden stakes Furniture Toilet paper Pressboard Charcoal Crafts Broom sticks Veneer Bowling pins Roofs Imitation bacon Plywood Toys Stairways Candy wrappers Dowels Signs Cider Fruit Paper Syrup Vitamins Cutting boards Paneling Pallets Cooking utensils Desks Windows Cardboard Pencils Food packaging Doors Grocery bags Shampoo Toilet seats Railroad ties Chewing gum Oars Toothpaste Energy Paper towels Coffee filters Nuts Firewood Oil spill agents Toothpicks Magazines Christmas trees Hockey sticks Diapers Golf tees Tool handles Liquid smoke Sponges Nail polish Animal bedding Cosmetics Mulch Wood pellets Fence posts Baby foods Postage stamps AND MORE! Can -
Mitek Guidefor ROOF Trussinstallation
TIMBER ROOF TRUSSES MiTek GUIDE for ROOF TRUSS Installation The Timber Roof Trusses you are about to install have been manufactured to engineering standards. To ensure that the trusses perform, it is essential that they be handled, erected and braced correctly. 2019 - Issue 1 mitek.com.au TABLE OF CONTENTS Fixing & Bracing Guidelines For Timber Roof Trusses General .....................................................................................................................................................................................3 Design ......................................................................................................................................................................................3 Transport..................................................................................................................................................................................3 Job Storage ..............................................................................................................................................................................3 Roof Layout .............................................................................................................................................................................4 Erection and Fixing ...................................................................................................................................................................4 Girder and Dutch Hip Girder Trusses .......................................................................................................................................7 -
Rolling Roof Trusses,” Pp
Rolling 94 FINE HOMEBUILDING Roof Trusses Factory-made trusses save time and give you a roof engineered for strength and stability BY LARRY HAUN oof trusses offer many advantages. They are lightweight (generally made from kiln-dried 2x4s), so they Rare fairly easy to handle. Because trusses are engineered, they can span longer distances without having to rest on interior bearing walls, allowing for more flexibility in room size and layout. Finally, installing trusses on most houses is pretty simple. If you want to get a house weatherized quickly, roof trusses are the way to go. Ceiling joists and rafters are installed in one shot, and no tricky cuts or calculations are required. Lay out braces as well as plates Laying out the top plates for trusses is the same as for roof rafters. Whenever possible, I mark truss locations on the top plates before the framed walls are raised, which keeps me from having to do the layout from a ladder or scaffolding. For most roofs, the trusses are spaced 2 ft. on center (o.c.). I simply hook a IT’S EASY TO KEEP A STRAIGHT FASCIA Even if the walls aren’t perfectly straight, the trusses can be. To keep the eaves aligned and the fascias straight, you can take advantage of truss uniformity. Snap a chalk- line along an outside top plate (top photo). Align a mark on the truss with the chalkline when you set the truss (photos right). DECEMBER 2004/JANUARY 2005 95 UNLOADING AND SPREADING TRUSSES SET THE STAGE Erected to ease installation, a temporary catwalk is completed before the trusses arrive in bundles (photo below). -
1996 LRFD Glulam
SUPPLEMENT Structural Glued Laminated Timber LRFD LOAD AND RESISTANCE FACTOR DESIGN MANUAL FOR ENGINEERED WOOD CONSTRUCTION SUPPLEMENT Structural Glued Laminated Timber LRFD LOAD AND RESISTANCE FACTOR DESIGN MANUAL FOR ENGINEERED WOOD CONSTRUCTION Copyright © 1996 APA – The Engineered Wood Association Preface This supplement contains adjustment factors, dimen- The reference strengths were derived according to the sions, factored resistance, reference strengths and other principles of ASTM D5457-93, Standard Specification for properties required to design structural glued laminated Computing the Reference Resistance of Wood-based Ma- timber in the LRFD format. In this format, the term “re- terials and Structural Connections for Load and sistance” is used to refer to member capacities (i.e., Resistance Factor Design. moment resistance, compression resistance, etc.). This is The tabulated reference strength values are to be used distinct from the term “strength” which refers to limit state within the reference end-use conditions defined therein. material properties — conceptually a “factored allowable When the end-use conditions fall outside the range of the stress.” reference conditions, the reference values shall be adjusted The member resistance values tabulated in this by the product of applicable adjustment factors as defined supplement are to be used in conjunction with the in AF&PA/ASCE 16-95 and also provided in this supple- design methodologies provided in AF&PA/ASCE 16-95, Stan- ment. For unusual end-use conditions, the designer should dard for Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) for consult additional literature for possible further adjust- Engineered Wood Construction. ments. APA/EWS TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter/Title Page Chapter/Title Page 1. -
Platform Frame Construction (Part 2)
STRUCTURAL TIMBER 4 ENGINEERING BULLETIN Timber frame structures – platform frame construction (part 2) Introduction Horizontal diaphragms and bracing In Timber Engineering Bulletin No. 3 (part 1 in this sub-series on platform Horizontal diaphragms in platform frame buildings are provided by the frame construction), the composition and terminology used for platform intermediate floors (with a wood-based subdeck material fixed directly to the timber frame building structures, and the structural engineering checks which joists) and the roof structure (with either a wood-based ‘sarking’ board or are required to verify the adequacy of the vertical load paths and the strength discrete diagonal bracing members) (Figure 3). These horizontal structural and stiff ness of the individual framing members, was introduced. diaphragms transfer horizontal loads acting on the building to the foundations by means of their connections to the wall panels (or vertical diaphragms). This Timber Engineering Bulletin introduces the engineering checks for overall building stability and the stability checks required for the wall diaphragms which provide shear (or racking) resistance to a platform timber frame structure. Robustness and disproportionate collapse design considerations for platform timber frame buildings are addressed in part 3 of this sub-series. Overall stability To achieve its stability, platform timber frame construction relies on the diaphragm action of floor structures to transfer horizontal forces to a distributed arrangement of loadbearing walls. The load bearing walls provide both vertical support and horizontal racking and shear resistance. Due to the presence of open-plan or asymmetric layouts or the occurrence of large openings in loadbearing walls, it may be necessary to provide other means of providing stability to the building, for example by the use of ‘portalised’ or ‘rigid’ frames or discrete braced bays as indicated in Figure 1. -
Timber Bridges Design, Construction, Inspection, and Maintenance
Timber Bridges Design, Construction, Inspection, and Maintenance Michael A. Ritter, Structural Engineer United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Ritter, Michael A. 1990. Timber Bridges: Design, Construction, Inspection, and Maintenance. Washington, DC: 944 p. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author acknowledges the following individuals, Agencies, and Associations for the substantial contributions they made to this publication: For contributions to Chapter 1, Fong Ou, Ph.D., Civil Engineer, USDA Forest Service, Engineering Staff, Washington Office. For contributions to Chapter 3, Jerry Winandy, Research Forest Products Technologist, USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. For contributions to Chapter 8, Terry Wipf, P.E., Ph.D., Associate Professor of Structural Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. For administrative overview and support, Clyde Weller, Civil Engineer, USDA Forest Service, Engineering Staff, Washington Office. For consultation and assistance during preparation and review, USDA Forest Service Bridge Engineers, Steve Bunnell, Frank Muchmore, Sakee Poulakidas, Ron Schmidt, Merv Eriksson, and David Summy; Russ Moody and Alan Freas (retired) of the USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory; Dave Pollock of the National Forest Products Association; and Lorraine Krahn and James Wacker, former students at the University of Wisconsin at Madison. In addition, special thanks to Mary Jane Baggett and Jim Anderson for editorial consultation, JoAnn Benisch for graphics preparation and layout, and Stephen Schmieding and James Vargo for photographic support. iii iv CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 TIMBER AS A BRIDGE MATERIAL 1.1 Introduction .............................................................................. l- 1 1.2 Historical Development of Timber Bridges ............................. l-2 Prehistory Through the Middle Ages ....................................... l-3 Middle Ages Through the 18th Century ................................... l-5 19th Century ............................................................................