Designing for Durability CONTINUING EDUCATION Strategies for Achieving Maximum Durability with Wood-Frame Construction Sponsored by Rethink Wood
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
15 – Construction Vocabulary
CONSTRUCTION VOCABULARY ABC (Aggregate Base Course): used in mixing with concrete and placed below concrete prior to the pouring of sidewalks, driveways, etc. It serves as a compacted solid base. Air return: A series of ducts in air conditioning system to return used air to air handler to be reconditioned. Ameri-mix: Maker of the pre-blended bag mixes we use in masonry work. Anchor Bolts: (also called J-bolts) Bolts embedded in concrete foundation used to hold sills in place. Anchor Straps: Straps embedded in concrete foundation used to hold sills in place, most commonly MASAs in our houses. Apron: A piece of driveway between sidewalk and curb. Back Fill: The replacement of dirt in holes, trenches and around foundations. Backing (aka blocking): a non-structural (usually 2x) framed support (i.e. for drywall). Balloon Framing: A special situationally required type of construction with studs that are longer than the standard length. Bay: The space between two parallel framing members (i.e. trusses). Beam: A horizontal structural member running between posts, columns or walls. Bearing wall (aka partition): A wall which carries a vertical structural load in addition to its own weight. Bevel: To cut an angle other than a right angle, such as on the edge of a board. Bird block (aka frieze board): An attic vent located between truss tails. Bird’s Mouth: A notch cut in the underside of a rafter to fit the top plate. Blocking (aka backing): A non-structural 2x framing support (i.e. for drywall) Board: Lumber less than 2” thick. Board Foot: The equivalent of a board 1’ square and 1” thick. -
Investigating the Durability of Structures by Dana Saba Bachelor of Engineering, Mcgill University, Montréal, 2011
Investigating the Durability of Structures by Dana Saba Bachelor of Engineering, McGill University, Montréal, 2011 Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Engineering in Civil and Environmental Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2013 © 2013 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All rights reserved. Signature of Author: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering May 10th, 2013 Certified by: Jerome J. Connor Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering Thesis Supervisor Certified by: Rory Clune Massachusetts Institute of Technology Thesis Reader Accepted by: Heidi Nepf Chair, Departmental Committee for Graduate Students 2 Investigating the Durability of Structures by Dana Saba Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering in May 10, 2013, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Engineering in Civil and Environmental Engineering Abstract The durability of structures is one of primary concerns in the engineering industry. Poor durability in design may result in a structure losing its performance to the extent where structural integrity is no longer satisfied and human lives are at stake. Moreover, the associated costs of maintenance and repair due to inadequate design considerations are high. Thus, designing for durable structures not only helps sustain our infrastructure, it also reduces future costs. This thesis identifies the key factors that define and impact durability, with particular attention paid to the effect of material choice on overall durability. This follows a study of the different deteriorating mechanisms that wood, steel and reinforced concrete undergo over time, and the different enhancement techniques used to reduce the adverse effects of these mechanisms. -
Back Framing
BACK FRAMING Back Framing is required to aide future steps in the construction process, ie cabinet installation, hanging drywall, towel bar installation etc. VERIFY ALL DOOR ROUGH OPENINGS AND KITCHEN WINDOW AND KITCHEN INTERIOR WALL LOCATION: Entry doors 37 ½” X 82” high Garage Utility ( people) Door 38 ½” X 82 ½” Bedroom, Bathroom Swing doors 38” wide X 82 ½” high Basement Door ONLY 34” wide X 82 ½” high Closet/ Bifold doors Width of door + 1 ½” ie 24” door, 25 ½” RO etc X 81” high A Kitchen window must be 78 ½” from garage wall to center of window. A Kitchen interior wall must be 12’ 1” form garage wall, Rough to Rough INSTALLING HURRICANE CLIPS: This fastening devise is used to secure the trusses to the exterior walls' top plates. They will be used on both the HOUSE and GARAGE trusses. Install 1 clip per truss at both ends of truss with 10D Simpson galvanized nails (Tico). Drive nails fully into truss. Because of the size of the nail, a pair of pliers is helpful to hold it to start the nail. There are 2 different styles of clip. Position the clip as shown and nail, Put a nail in EVERY hole. KITCHEN CABINET BLOCKING: MATERIALS 2 X 4 and 2 X 6 of various lengths. Kitchen cabinet blocking is needed for a timely and reduced stress cabinet installation. Full blocking is required on ALL 3 kitchen walls and the bathroom wall behind the vanity. LAYOUT Snap chalk lines at the following heights off the floor 80- ½” – 84” for TOP of the upper cabinets with a 2x4 wall cleat. -
Connectors & Fasteners for Modular Building Catalog
Connectors & Fasteners for Modular Building C-C-MODULAR18 | (800) 999-5099 | strongtie.com Smart Solutions for Modular Building Simpson Strong-Tie® connectors and fasteners offer improved speed, strength and versatility for modular building. These products save time in manufacturing and provide ease of installation on the jobsite. This catalog is designed to help you easily locate the right connector or fastener to meet your modular building construction needs. Our products come with the quality, value, service and on-time delivery that we have built our reputation on for the past 60 years. If you need help finding the right product for your job, give us a call at (800) 999-5099. Simpson Strong-Tie® Connectors & Fasteners for Modular Building Table of Contents Code Reports ...........................................................................6 MMHC Hinged Roof Connector ..............................................21 Corrosion Information .........................................................7–10 BC Post Base .........................................................................22 Important Information and General Notes .........................11–15 LSTA/MSTA Strap Ties ...........................................................23 Connectors CS/CMST Coiled Straps ...................................................24–25 MMLU Face-Mount Hangers ..................................................17 Fasteners H2.5A Roof Tiedown ........................................................18–19 Strong-Drive® SDWC Truss Screw ....................................27–28 -
Material Quantities in Building Structures and Their Environmental Impact
Material quantities in building structures and their environmental impact by Catherine De Wolf B.Sc., M.Sc. in Civil Architectural Engineering Vrije Universiteit Brussel and Université Libre de Bruxelles, 2012 Submitted to the Department of Architecture in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Building Technology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2014 © 2014 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All rights reserved. Signature of Author: Department of Architecture May 9, 2014 Certified by: John A. Ochsendorf Professor of Architecture and Civil and Environmental Engineering Thesis Supervisor Accepted by: Takehiko Nagakura Associate Professor of Design and Computation Chair of the Department Committee on Graduate Students John E. Fernández Professor of Architecture, Building Technology, and Engineering Systems Head, Building Technology Program Co-director, International Design Center, MIT Thesis Reader Frances Yang Structures and Sustainability Specialist at Arup Thesis Reader “It is […] important to remember that unlike operational carbon emissions the embodied carbon cannot be reversed” Craig Jones, Circular Ecology Material quantities in building structures and their environmental impact by Catherine De Wolf Submitted to the Department of Architecture in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Building Technology on May 9, 2014. Thesis Supervisor: John Ochsendorf Title Supervisor: Professor of Architecture and Civil and Environmental Engineering -
Residential Seismic Strengthening
Residential Seismic Strengthening Methods to Reduce Potential Earthquake Damage 12 Portland and the surrounding communities are homes, buildings and utilities can reduce damage and the dangers of serious injury or loss of life from located in a seismically active region. an earthquake. Modified from Although most Oregonians have not witnessed a www.oregongeology.org/sub/earthquakes/EQs.htm large earthquake in this region, large earthquakes The City of Portland, Bureau of Development have occurred in the past. The Cascadia Subduction Services has a program to help you make your Zone lies off the Oregon and Washington coasts where two sections of the earth’s crust (tectonic home more secure in our next earthquake. plates) are colliding, with one plate sliding beneath (subducting) the other. Subduction zones have produced some of the most powerful earthquakes ever recorded, often having magnitudes of 8 to 9 or larger. The 2004 Great Sumatra-Andaman (magnitude 9.1) earthquake occurred on a subduction zone. Studies have found evidence that very large earthquakes have occurred repeatedly in the past on the Cascadia Subduction Zone, most recently in January, 1700. Scientists believe the Cascadia Subduction Zone is likely to produce large earthquakes in the future. Extensive damage to buildings as a result of strong and sustained ground Purpose www.portlandoregon.gov/bds shaking is expected in the Portland area in the event The strengthening methods described by this • of a Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquake. program are intended to reduce the likelihood of your home being severely damaged by being displaced from its foundation or cripple walls in an Oregon also has many crustal faults. -
Framing: Walls
8/18/14 Introduction to Framing Terminology and Concepts Terminology: Framing Level Two points on exactly the same horizontal plane. Square Intersecting lines or faces that form an exact 90° angle. Plumb Flush Two points on exactly Two faces on exactly the same vertical plane. the same plane. Terminology: Subfloors Sill Plate Decking (or “subfloor”) Pressure-treated Rimboard (or “rim band”) ¾” thick tongue-and- lumber supported by Engineered lumber (of various heights) groove sheathing, glued foundation and and nailed to joists. shimmed to be level. Joists Engineered joists (of various heights) Flange which span the foundation. Joists sit (or chord) Foundation on the sill plate and support the Poured concrete subfloor decking. Web foundation walls Double Top Plate Terminology: Walls Second top plate (also called “Cap Plate”) overlapping and Top/Bottom Plates tying together multiple walls. Horizontal lumber making up the top and bottom of a wall. Sheathing Components Studs OSB attached to Pre-assembled pieces Vertical lumber outside of exterior installed in walls, like spanning between top walls for strength. windows and doors. and bottom plates. Terminology: Walls Bracing Any material used to Blocking make the wall stronger. Lumber installed in a wall to Some are temporary; provide support and nailing some are permanent for something else (like intersecting walls or cabinets). King studs Terminology: Wall Components Studs framing the left and right of a window/door. Headers Jacks / Trimmers Horizontal supports Support a header. spanning over a 3’ window or door. Structural header 5’ (2) 2x8s on edge with Cripples (2) pcs 1” blueboard insulation between. Vertical supports above and below windows/doors Non-structural header (1) 2x6 on the flat. -
Applications of Aluminium Alloys in Civil Engineering
T. Dokšanović i dr. Primjene aluminijskih legura u građevinarstvu ISSN 1330-3651 (Print), ISSN 1848-6339 (Online) https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20151213105944 APPLICATIONS OF ALUMINIUM ALLOYS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING Tihomir Dokšanović, Ivica Džeba, Damir Markulak Subject review Although aluminium is a long known structural material, its use is not in accordance with the benefits achieved by its implementation. There are several reasons for such an adverse state. Those that stand out are the late development of a regulative framework for the design of structures, and still the need for improvement, lack of knowledge on application examples and not stressed enough potential areas of use. However, positive trends are present and aluminium alloys are competitive, especially if their positive properties can be utilized and negative properties diminished through purpose oriented design approach. Given examples present good application utilization of aluminium alloys characteristics, and shown new application research can provide directions for further expansion of competitiveness. Structural uses are grouped in suitable areas of application and put into local and global context. Keywords: bridge; façade; refurbishment; roof system; seismic Primjene aluminijskih legura u građevinarstvu Pregledni članak Iako je aluminij već dugo prisutan konstrukcijski materijal, uporaba mu nije u skladu s dobrobitima koji se ostvaruju njegovom primjenom. Nekoliko je uzročnika takvog stanja. Ističu se relativno kasni razvoj normativnog okvira za dimenzioniranje konstrukcija, i još uvijek potreba za poboljšanjem, nedovoljna raširenost saznanja o primjenama te nedostatno naglašena potencijalna područja primjene. Međutim, pozitivni trendovi su prisutni, a legure aluminija su konkurentne, posebno ako se njegova pozitivna svojstva mogu iskoristiti, a negativna umanjiti kroz proračunski pristup orijentiran prema namjeni. -
Structural Composite Materials Tailored for Damping
L Journal of Alloys and Compounds 355 (2003) 216–223 www.elsevier.com/locate/jallcom S tructural composite materials tailored for damping D.D.L. Chung* Composite Materials Research Laboratory, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260-4400, USA Abstract This paper reviews the tailoring of structural composite materials for damping. By the use of the interfaces and viscoelasticity provided by appropriate components in a composite material, the damping capacity can be increased with negligible decrease, if any, of the stiffness. In the case of cement–matrix composites, the use of silica fume as an admixture results in increases in both the damping capacity and the storage modulus. In the case of continuous fiber polymer–matrix lightweight composites, the use of submicron-diameter discontinuous carbon filaments as an interlaminar additive is more effective than the use of an interlaminar viscoelastic layer in enhancing the loss modulus when the temperature exceeds 50 8C. Surface treatment of the composite components is important. In the case of steel reinforced concrete, the steel reinforcing bar (rebar) contributes much to the damping, but appropriate surface treatment of the rebar further enhances the damping. 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Disordered systems; Polymers; Elastomers and plastics; Surfaces and interfaces; Elasticity; Anharmonicity 1 . Introduction [2–4] is the goal of the structural material tailoring described in this review paper. The development of materials for vibration and acoustic Vibrations are undesirable for structures, due to the need damping has been focused on metals and polymers [1]. for structural stability, position control, durability (par- Most of these materials are functional materials rather than ticularly durability against fatigue), performance, and noise practical structural materials due to their high cost, low reduction. -
Structural Materials
OPTI 222 Mechanical Design in Optical Engineering Structural Materials Beryllium Among the light metals, beryllium is characterized by its out-standing combination of properties--low density (0.067 lb/in3), high strength (60 psi), good thermal properties, low cross-section, to thermal neutrons and high melting point (2300 °F). The use of beryllium has nevertheless been restricted by its poor ductility and low resistance to impact, as well as by factors of its toxicity and high cost. Some of the properties of beryllium are summarized as follows: 1. Density: Beryllium "has a relatively low density of 0.067 lbs/in3. This is slightly higher than the density of magnesium and about two-thirds that of aluminum. 2. Modulus of Elasticity: The modulus of elasticity of Beryllium high, being 3.1 x 104 kg/mm2 (44 x 106 psi). This combined with its low density, makes it attractive as a light, but stiff, material. 3. Tensile Properties: The mechanical properties of beryllium are affected by the method of production. Hot-pressed beryllium has a room temperature ultimate tensile strength of around 60 Ksi with a ductility of 0.5 - 0.3%. Beryllium retains its strength at high temperatures; even at 600 °C, it has an ultimate tensile strength of about 25 Ksi. Above 250 °C, its ductility rises to a level in excess of 10%. The fatigue strength of beryllium is high, being in excess of 80% of the ultimate tensile strength. Its room temperature impact strength, however, is negligible and in this respect it performs more like a ceramic than a metal. -
Platform Frame Construction (Part 2)
STRUCTURAL TIMBER 4 ENGINEERING BULLETIN Timber frame structures – platform frame construction (part 2) Introduction Horizontal diaphragms and bracing In Timber Engineering Bulletin No. 3 (part 1 in this sub-series on platform Horizontal diaphragms in platform frame buildings are provided by the frame construction), the composition and terminology used for platform intermediate floors (with a wood-based subdeck material fixed directly to the timber frame building structures, and the structural engineering checks which joists) and the roof structure (with either a wood-based ‘sarking’ board or are required to verify the adequacy of the vertical load paths and the strength discrete diagonal bracing members) (Figure 3). These horizontal structural and stiff ness of the individual framing members, was introduced. diaphragms transfer horizontal loads acting on the building to the foundations by means of their connections to the wall panels (or vertical diaphragms). This Timber Engineering Bulletin introduces the engineering checks for overall building stability and the stability checks required for the wall diaphragms which provide shear (or racking) resistance to a platform timber frame structure. Robustness and disproportionate collapse design considerations for platform timber frame buildings are addressed in part 3 of this sub-series. Overall stability To achieve its stability, platform timber frame construction relies on the diaphragm action of floor structures to transfer horizontal forces to a distributed arrangement of loadbearing walls. The load bearing walls provide both vertical support and horizontal racking and shear resistance. Due to the presence of open-plan or asymmetric layouts or the occurrence of large openings in loadbearing walls, it may be necessary to provide other means of providing stability to the building, for example by the use of ‘portalised’ or ‘rigid’ frames or discrete braced bays as indicated in Figure 1. -
Material Quantities in Building Structures and Their Environmental Impact
Material quantities in building structures and their environmental impact by Catherine De Wolf B.Sc., M.Sc. in Civil Architectural Engineering Vrije Universiteit Brussel and Université Libre de Bruxelles, 2012 Submitted to the Department of Architecture in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Building Technology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2014 © 2014 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All rights reserved. Signature of Author: Department of Architecture May 9, 2014 Certified by: John A. Ochsendorf Professor of Architecture and Civil and Environmental Engineering Thesis Supervisor Accepted by: Takehiko Nagakura Associate Professor of Design and Computation Chair of the Department Committee on Graduate Students 2 John E. Fernández Professor of Architecture, Building Technology, and Engineering Systems Head, Building Technology Program Co-director, International Design Center, MIT Thesis Reader Frances Yang Structures and Sustainability Specialist at Arup Thesis Reader 3 “It is […] important to remember that unlike operational carbon emissions the embodied carbon cannot be reversed” Craig Jones, Circular Ecology 4 Material quantities in building structures and their environmental impact by Catherine De Wolf Submitted to the Department of Architecture in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Building Technology on May 9, 2014. Thesis Supervisor: John Ochsendorf Title Supervisor: Professor of Architecture and Civil and Environmental Engineering Abstract Improved operational energy efficiency has increased the percentage of embodied energy in the total life cycle of building structures. Despite a growing interest in this field, practitioners lack a comprehensive survey of material quantities and embodied carbon in building structures.