DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliometric Analysis of Ongoing Projects: Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking (IMI)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliometric Analysis of Ongoing Projects: Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking (IMI) Bibliometric analysis of ongoing projects: Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking (IMI) IMI EXECUTIVE OFFICE Fourth report: April 2014 Prepared by Thomson Reuters on behalf of IMI JU Executive Office under a public procurement procedure Copyright IMI JU April 2014 Disclaimer/Legal Notice: This document and attachments have been prepared solely for the Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking (IMI JU). All contents may not be re-used (in whatever form and by whatever medium) by any third party without prior permission of the IMI JU. 2 Copyright IMI JU April 2014 1 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 5 2 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Overview ................................................................................................................................. 9 2.2 Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking (IMI) .......................................................... 9 2.3 Thomson Reuters ................................................................................................................... 9 2.4 Thomson Reuters Research Analytics ................................................................................. 10 2.5 Thomson Reuters Custom Analytics & Engineered Solutions ............................................. 10 2.6 Scope of this report ............................................................................................................... 10 3 Data sources, indicators and interpretation .................................................................................... 11 3.1 Bibliometric data and citation analysis .................................................................................. 11 3.1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................... 11 3.1.2 Publication and citation data sources ............................................................................... 11 3.1.3 Bibliometric and citation data definitions and indicators .................................................. 12 3.1.4 Interpretation of bibliometric indicators and citation analyses .......................................... 14 3.1.5 Dataset definitions used in the bibliometric indicators and citation analyses .................. 16 4 Citation analysis – IMI-supported publications overall .................................................................... 17 4.1 Publications from IMI-supported projects ............................................................................. 17 4.1.1 Citation data for publications from IMI-supported projects ............................................... 18 4.2 Share of papers relative to other publication types .............................................................. 19 4.3 Trends in publication output.................................................................................................. 20 4.4 In which journals do IMI project publications appear most frequently? ................................ 22 4.5 Which research fields account for the highest volume of IMI project publications? ............. 25 4.6 Is IMI project research well-cited? ........................................................................................ 26 4.7 How does IMI project research compare with research from other biomedical funding organisations? .................................................................................................................................... 30 4.7.1 Trends in the output and citation impact of IMI project research compared with Wellcome Trust research .............................................................................................................. 30 4.8 How collaborative is IMI project research? ........................................................................... 33 5 Citation analysis – at IMI project level ............................................................................................ 35 5.1 Trends in publication output by IMI funding call ................................................................... 35 5.2 Summary bibliometric analyses for IMI projects – Call 1 ...................................................... 36 5.3 Summary bibliometric analyses for IMI projects – Call 2 ...................................................... 38 5.4 Summary bibliometric analyses for IMI projects – Call 3 ...................................................... 40 5.5 Trends in publication output and citation impact for IMI projects ......................................... 41 6 Bibliometric indicators for IMI researchers: productivity, research performance and collaboration44 3 Copyright IMI JU April 2014 6.1 Publications by IMI-supported researchers .......................................................................... 44 6.2 Citation data for publications by IMI-supported researchers ................................................ 44 6.2.1 Strengths and limitations .................................................................................................. 44 6.3 Bibliometric indicators for IMI-supported researchers: productivity ...................................... 45 6.4 Bibliometric indicators for IMI-supported researchers: research performance ..................... 46 6.5 Collaboration between IMI-supported researchers at individual level .................................. 48 6.6 Collaboration between IMI-supported researchers at sector level ....................................... 51 6.7 Collaboration analysis before and after IMI funding by disease area .................................. 56 6.8 Collaboration analysis before and after IMI funding by sector ............................................. 58 6.9 Mapping collaboration among IMI-supported researchers ................................................... 60 Annex 1: Summary of new IMI-supported publications ........................................................................ 64 A1.1 Summary of new IMI-supported publications – output ........................................................ 64 A1.2 Summary of new IMI-supported publications – citations ..................................................... 66 Annex 2: Definitions of Web of Science journal categories .................................................................. 68 Annex 3: Bibliography of highly-cited papers, ‘hot papers’ and those papers with highest interdisciplinarity ..................................................................................................................................... 70 Annex 4: Bibliometrics and citation analysis ......................................................................................... 80 4 Copyright IMI JU April 2014 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents a bibliometric analysis of IMI research associated with funding Calls 1 to 6, using citations as an index of research quality and co-authorship as an index of collaboration. The analyses use two sets of research publications, publications from IMI projects (IMI project research) and publications from IMI-supported researchers (IMI researchers). The overall volume of IMI project research has increased rapidly since 2009 and the initiative continues to show rapid growth. This is partly to be expected as the number of funded projects rises and those projects funded earliest in the program begin to publish. To date, IMI projects have produced 657 publications, of which 629 have been matched to the Thomson Reuters Web of Science. Around three quarters of IMI project research has been published in high impact journals, i.e. those journals in the highest quartile by Journal Impact Factor. The volume of IMI research has also increased at the level of individual projects. BTCure (Call 2) is the most prolific project in any of the funding Calls with output surpassing NEWMEDS and EUROPAIN (the most prolific projects funded in Call 1) with a substantial expansion in 2013 output accompanied by rising citation impact. Among more recent projects, EU-AIMS (Call 3) has shown substantial growth in output, and its research is now cited nearly four times (3.96) world average. IMI project research is wide-ranging – the research portfolio from IMI projects covers diverse research fields. IMI project research has been published most frequently in Rheumatology, Pharmacology & Pharmacy, Neurosciences and Endocrinology & Metabolism journals. IMI project research is well-regarded. The quality of IMI project research (as indexed by citation impact) has been maintained while output has grown. The citation impact of this research is, at twice world average (2.05), internationally influential. Around one quarter of papers from IMI projects are ‛highly-cited’, that is, they belong to the world’s top ten percent of papers in that journal category and year of publication, when ranked by number of citations received. Relative to established funding organisations IMI project research performs well. Trends in the quality of this research are generally comparable to the Wellcome Trust, a leading UK funder of biomedical research. Researchers funded by IMI are well-regarded by their peers. The total research published by IMI researchers funded in Calls 1 to 5 (as opposed to that directly associated with IMI funding) is well cited with an average
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Bibliometric Analysis
    787 Original Article Page 1 of 9 The 100 most cited articles on lung cancer screening: a bibliometric analysis Meng Li1,2, Qiang Cai2,3, Jing-Wen Ma1, Li Zhang1,2, Claudia I. Henschke2 1Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; 2Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, USA; 3Department of Radiology, Shanxi Provincial People’s Hospital, Taiyuan, China Contributions: (I) Conception and design: M Li, CI Henschke; (II) Administrative support: CI Henschke; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: M Li, CI Henschke; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: M Li, L Zhang; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: M Li, Q Cai, JW Ma; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors. Correspondence to: Claudia I. Henschke. Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai Health System, 1 Gustave Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA. Email: [email protected]. Background: The number of citations of an article reflects its impact on the scientific community. The aim of this study was to identify and characterize the 100 most cited articles on lung cancer screening. Methods: The 100 most cited articles on lung cancer screening published in all scientific journals were identified using the Web of Science database. Relevant data, including the number of citations, publication year, publishing journal and impact factor (IF), authorship and country of origin, article type and study design, screening modality, and main topic, were collected and analyzed. Results: The 100 most cited articles were all English and published between 1973 and 2017, with 81 published after 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Listed by Highest Impact Factor
    LatestImpactFactors http://mail.elsevieralerts.com/go.asp?%2fbESJ001%2fxFV7O22F%2... To display this email in a browser, please click here Share this with colleagues on your social network Dear Subscriber, The latest impact factors* for Elsevier's Materials Science journals have just been released and highlights include... Progress In Polymer Science 2008 Impact Factor WAS 16.819 2009 Impact Factor NOW 23.753 Nano Today 2008 Impact Factor WAS 8.795 2009 Impact Factor NOW 13.237 Biomaterials 2008 Impact Factor WAS 6.646 2009 Impact Factor NOW 7.365 Polymer 2008 Impact Factor WAS 3.331 2009 Impact Factor NOW 3.573 Composites Science And Technology 2008 Impact Factor WAS 2.533 2009 Impact Factor NOW 2.901 Listed by highest Impact Factor Journal Title 2008 Impact 2009 Factor WAS Impact Factor NOW Progress In Materials 18.132 15.769 Science Materials Science & 12.619 12.217 Engineering R-Reports Materials Today 12.929 11.452 Carbon 4.373 4.504 Current Opinions In Solid 2.976 4.000 State And Materials Science Стр.1из3 24.06.1011:25 LatestImpactFactors http://mail.elsevieralerts.com/go.asp?%2fbESJ001%2fxFV7O22F%2... Science Acta Biomaterialia: 3.727 3.975 Structure - Property - Function Relationships Acta Materialia 3.729 3.760 Scripta Materialia 2.887 2.949 Reactive & Functional 2.039 2.461 Polymers Composites Part 1.951 2.410 A-Applied Science And Manufacturing Cement And Concrete 1.549 2.376 Research Corrosion Science 2.293 2.316 European Polymer Journal 2.143 2.310 Intermetallics 2.034 2.231 Polymer Degradation And 2.320 2.154 Stability Journal
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Publications in Respiratory Journals from Chinese
    Open Access Research BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004201 on 28 February 2014. Downloaded from Scientific publications in respiratory journals from Chinese authors in various parts of North Asia: a 10-year survey of literature Bo Ye,1 Ting-Ting Du,1 Ting Xie,2 Jun-Tao Ji,1 Zhao-Hong Zheng,1 Zhuan Liao,1 Liang-Hao Hu,1 Zhao-Shen Li1 To cite: Ye B, Du T-T, Xie T, ABSTRACT et al Strengths and limitations of this study . Scientific publications in Objectives: Respiratory disease remains one of the respiratory journals from leading causes of morbidity and mortality in China. Chinese authors in various A few journals covered resources beyond respiratory However, little is known about the research status of parts of North Asia: a 10-year even selected from the respiratory system of Science — survey of literature. BMJ Open respirology in three major regions of China Mainland Citation Index Expanded (SCIE). Besides, some 2014;4:e004201. doi:10.1136/ (ML), Hong Kong (HK) and Taiwan (TW). A 10-year related journals not shown in SCIE were not col- bmjopen-2013-004201 survey of literature was conducted to compare the lected. Some respiratory medicine research articles three regions’ outputs in the research of respirology. were published in general journals, rather than in the ▸ Prepublication history for Design: A bibliometric study. specialized ones. Searching by the author’s address this paper is available online. Setting: China. (China, HK or TW) led to another problem that the To view these files please Participants and outcome measures: A literature articles which addressed other cities or provinces visit the journal online search in PubMed database, updated as of September were not included.
    [Show full text]
  • Electrospun Thymosin Beta-4 Loaded PLGA/PLA Nanofiber/ Microfiber Hybrid Arnsy for Tendon Tissue Engineering Application
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Mechanical & Materials Engineering Faculty Mechanical & Materials Engineering, Publications Department of 2020 Electrospun Thymosin Beta-4 Loaded PLGA/PLA Nanofiber/ Microfiber Hybrid arnsY for Tendon Tissue Engineering Application Shaohua Wu University of Nebraska Medical Center Rong Zhou Qingdao University Fang Zhou Qingdao University Philipp N. Streubel University of Nebraska Medical Center, [email protected] Shaojuan Chen Qingdao University, [email protected] See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/mechengfacpub Part of the Mechanics of Materials Commons, Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Commons, Other Engineering Science and Materials Commons, and the Other Mechanical Engineering Commons Wu, Shaohua; Zhou, Rong; Zhou, Fang; Streubel, Philipp N.; Chen, Shaojuan; and Duan, Bin, "Electrospun Thymosin Beta-4 Loaded PLGA/PLA Nanofiber/ Microfiber Hybrid arnsY for Tendon Tissue Engineering Application" (2020). Mechanical & Materials Engineering Faculty Publications. 478. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/mechengfacpub/478 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Mechanical & Materials Engineering, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mechanical & Materials Engineering Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors Shaohua Wu, Rong Zhou, Fang Zhou, Philipp N. Streubel, Shaojuan Chen, and Bin Duan This article is available at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ mechengfacpub/478 HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author Mater Sci Manuscript Author Eng C Mater Manuscript Author Biol Appl. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2020 March 09. Published in final edited form as: Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Characterization and in Vivo Evaluation of Laser Sintered and Machined Implants Followed by Resorbable-Blasting Media Process: a Study in Sheep
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016 Mar 1;21 (2):e206-13. Histology evaluation of laser sintered and machined implants Journal section: Oral Surgery doi:10.4317/medoral.20946 Publication Types: Research http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.20946 Surface characterization and in vivo evaluation of laser sintered and machined implants followed by resorbable-blasting media process: A study in sheep Michelle Bowers 1, Daniel Yoo 1, Charles Marin 5, Luiz Gil 2, Nour Shabaka 3, Matt Goldstein 1, Malvin Janal 4, Nick Tovar 1, Ronaldo Hirata 1, Estevam Bonfante 1, Paulo Coelho 1 1 Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, USA 2 Department of Oral Surgery, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis SC, Brazil 3 New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates 4 Department of Epidemiology, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, USA 5 Posgraduated program in Dentistry - Unigranrio University, School of Health Sciences, Duque de Caxias RJ, Brazil Correspondence: 345 E 24th Street 10010. Biomaterials and Biomimetics New York University New York, NY, USA Bowers M, Yoo D, Marin C, Gil L, Shabaka N, Goldstein M, Janal M, [email protected] Tovar N, Hirata R, Bonfante E, Coelho P. Surface characterization and in vivo evaluation of laser sintered and machined implants followed by resorbable-blasting media process: A study in sheep. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016 Mar 1;21 (2):e206-13. Received: 17/07/2015 http://www.medicinaoral.com/medoralfree01/v21i2/medoralv21i2p206.pdf Accepted: 14/10/2015 Article Number: 20946 http://www.medicinaoral.com/ © Medicina Oral S.
    [Show full text]
  • British Thoracic Society Winter Meeting
    February 2021 Volume 76 Supplement 1 76 S1 Volume 76 Supplement 1 Pages A1–A256 ThoraxAN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY MEDICINE British Thoracic Society THORAX Winter Meeting Wednesday 17 to Friday 19 February 2021 Programme and Abstracts February 2021 February thorax.bmj.com PROGRAMME AND Thorax ABSTRACTS British Thoracic Society Winter Meeting Wednesday 17 to Friday 19 February 2021 Programme and Abstracts Approved by the Federation of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the UK for 18 category I (external) credits (6 credits per day). Code: 133787 DAILY PROGRAMME WEDNESDAY 17 FEBRUARY 2021 All Symposia, Guest Lectures, Journal Clubs and Spoken Sessions will be shown online live at the times below, and will be available to view via the relevant ‘session type’ tab online. Poster presentations will be pre-recorded and available on demand each day and should be viewed prior to the Poster Discussion Q&A, which will be online live at the times below, all via the ‘Poster Sessions’ tab. Time Session Type Session Title 7.00am – 6.00pm Poster viewing on demand P1-P11 Lessons from COVID-19 throughout the day with live P12-P24 Lung cancer: treatment options and care pathways discussions at the programmed P38-P51 COPD: clinical science times P63-P75 Primary care and paediatric asthma P76-P88 Virtually systematic: current interventions and digital delivery in pulmonary rehabilitation 7.45am – 8.00am Symposium Daily preview 8.00am – 8.30am BTS Journal Club New insights to chronic cough 8.30am – 10.00am Symposium Neutrophilic asthma 8.30am –
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Journal Citation Reports Journals in the 2018 Release of JCR 2 Journals in the 2018 Release of JCR
    2018 Journal Citation Reports Journals in the 2018 release of JCR 2 Journals in the 2018 release of JCR Abbreviated Title Full Title Country/Region SCIE SSCI 2D MATER 2D MATERIALS England ✓ 3 BIOTECH 3 BIOTECH Germany ✓ 3D PRINT ADDIT MANUF 3D PRINTING AND ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING United States ✓ 4OR-A QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF 4OR-Q J OPER RES OPERATIONS RESEARCH Germany ✓ AAPG BULL AAPG BULLETIN United States ✓ AAPS J AAPS JOURNAL United States ✓ AAPS PHARMSCITECH AAPS PHARMSCITECH United States ✓ AATCC J RES AATCC JOURNAL OF RESEARCH United States ✓ AATCC REV AATCC REVIEW United States ✓ ABACUS-A JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING ABACUS FINANCE AND BUSINESS STUDIES Australia ✓ ABDOM IMAGING ABDOMINAL IMAGING United States ✓ ABDOM RADIOL ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY United States ✓ ABHANDLUNGEN AUS DEM MATHEMATISCHEN ABH MATH SEM HAMBURG SEMINAR DER UNIVERSITAT HAMBURG Germany ✓ ACADEMIA-REVISTA LATINOAMERICANA ACAD-REV LATINOAM AD DE ADMINISTRACION Colombia ✓ ACAD EMERG MED ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE United States ✓ ACAD MED ACADEMIC MEDICINE United States ✓ ACAD PEDIATR ACADEMIC PEDIATRICS United States ✓ ACAD PSYCHIATR ACADEMIC PSYCHIATRY United States ✓ ACAD RADIOL ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY United States ✓ ACAD MANAG ANN ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS United States ✓ ACAD MANAGE J ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL United States ✓ ACAD MANAG LEARN EDU ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT LEARNING & EDUCATION United States ✓ ACAD MANAGE PERSPECT ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES United States ✓ ACAD MANAGE REV ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW United States ✓ ACAROLOGIA ACAROLOGIA France ✓
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanical and Cytocompatibility Evaluation of UHMWPE/PCL/Bioglass® Fibrous Composite for Acetabular Labrum Implant
    materials Article Mechanical and Cytocompatibility Evaluation of UHMWPE/PCL/Bioglass® Fibrous Composite for Acetabular Labrum Implant Adhi Anindyajati * , Philip Boughton and Andrew J. Ruys School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; [email protected] (P.B.); [email protected] (A.J.R.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 24 January 2019; Accepted: 8 March 2019; Published: 19 March 2019 Abstract: In this study, a fibrous composite was developed as synthetic graft for labral reconstruction treatment, comprised of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) fabric, ultrafine fibre of polycaprolactone (PCL), and 45S5 Bioglass®. This experiment aimed to examine the mechanical performance and cytocompatibility of the composite. Electrospinning and a slurry dipping technique were applied for composite fabrication. To assess the mechanical performance of UHMWPE, tensile cyclic loading test was carried out. Meanwhile, cytocompatibility of the composite on fibroblastic cells was examined through a viability assay, as well as SEM images to observe cell attachment and proliferation. The mechanical test showed that the UHMWPE fabric had a mean displacement of 1.038 mm after 600 cycles, approximately 4.5 times greater resistance compared to that of natural labrum, based on data obtained from literature. A viability assay demonstrated the predominant occupation of live cells on the material surface, suggesting that the composite was able to provide a viable environment for cell growth. Meanwhile, SEM images exhibited cell adhesion and the formation of cell colonies on the material surface. These results indicated that the UHMWPE/PCL/Bioglass® composite could be a promising material for labrum implants.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Acceptance Time in Respiratory Research: Room for Improvement?
    AGORA | RESEARCH LETTER Paper acceptance time in respiratory research: room for improvement? To the Editor: We recently submitted a paper to a top five respiratory journal in terms of average citations per article. The paper was swiftly sent for peer review. A month later, the review was in, and the paper was now “awaiting associate editor decision”. After another 6 weeks, and at the time of writing this letter, the paper is still with the handling editor. Like us, many authors have probably at this stage speculated when it would be reasonable to contact the editorial office and enquire about the status. A recent study carried out for Nature showed that the median time between submission and acceptance of a paper for 4375 different journals was approximately 100 days [1, 2]. The study was based on an analysis of all papers in PubMed for which these data were listed from 1965 to 2015 and included more than 6 million observations of acceptance and publication time. Somewhat surprisingly, the acceptance time has remained fairly constant for more than 30 years and may in fact underestimate the actual time, as not all journals choose to deposit these data. Moreover, some journals use the re-submission date rather than the date for initial submission as the “start date”, which may also bias the results. Based on this large dataset at hand, available on GitHub [2], it is possible to analyse acceptance time for most respiratory journals. If the analysis is restricted to those respiratory journals with more than three citations per paper over 2 years, of which there are 22 journals [3], 18820 papers are found with reported acceptance times.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual General Meeting
    ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING The ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING of the British Thoracic Society will be held on Wednesday 2nd December 2020 at 4:30PM virtually on Zoom. Please register in advance via Zoom: https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_FREtv- O6SYeHAq-FBBfXNw It would be fair to say that the BTS Strategic Plan highlighted in the 2019 AGM papers and Annual Report and aligned to the 4 UK Nations’ Health Plans, took a step back in 2020 due to the unprecedented challenges that the COVID-19 pandemic placed upon the global population and global healthcare. Specifically, this presented both the British public and our healthcare systems with huge challenges at all levels. Respiratory medicine, BTS and its members have stepped up to this task with impressive innovation, dedication, hard graft and positivity. BTS is, and has been, one of the premier sources of guidance on the management of COVID-19 with a dedicated website hosting BTS guidance, as well as information from government sources across the four nations and allied specialist societies. The webpages have been, and continue to be, viewed hundreds of thousands of times. We are all aware that we are not out of the fire by any stretch and the prospect of managing “endemic” acute COVID-19, COVID-19 follow up including “Post COVID-19 Syndrome” together with seasonal “Winter pressures” allied to our “usual” population of patients with respiratory disease is going to remain challenging. As with the general population, this has not been without a physical and emotional cost, with many of our members being infected and suffering stress, anxiety and potential burnout.
    [Show full text]
  • Liste Des Revues SCOPUS
    Liste des revues SCOPUS ENGINEERING Open N° Titre ISSN E-ISSN Acces Publisher Country Loc status 1 A + U-Architecture and Urbanism 03899160 Not OA Japan Architects Co., Ltd. Japan Orhan Hacihasanoglu ITU Faculty of 2 A|Z ITU Journal of Faculty of Architecture 13028324 Not OA Turkey Architecture A B B Corporate Management Services 3 ABB Review 10133119 Not OA Switzerland AG 4 ABU Technical Review 01266209 Not OA Asia-Pacific Broadcasting Union Malaysia 5 Accident Analysis and Prevention 00014575 Not OA Pergamon Press Ltd. United Kingdom 6 Accreditation and Quality Assurance 09491775 14320517 Not OA Springer Verlag Germany 7 ACI Materials Journal 0889325X Not OA American Concrete Institute United States 8 ACI Structural Journal 08893241 Not OA American Concrete Institute United States ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Association for Computing Machinary, 9 15504832 Not OA United States Computing Systems Inc. ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Association for Computing Machinary, 10 15564665 Not OA United States Adaptive Systems Inc. ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Association for Computing Machinary, 11 10844309 Not OA United States Electronic Systems Inc. ACM Transactions on Information and System Association for Computing Machinary, 12 10949224 Not OA United States Security Inc. 13 ACS Nano 19360851 1936086X Not OA American Chemical Society United States 14 ACS Synthetic Biology 21615063 Not OA American Chemical Society United States 15 Acta Astronautica 00945765 Not OA Pergamon Press Ltd. United Kingdom 16 Acta Biomaterialia
    [Show full text]
  • Top 20 Journals Relevant to Overall Health Care Services Ranked by Impact Factor
    The following lists of journals have been provided as a resource to assist the Quality Improvement community in identifying high impact journals, and journals influential in specific topic areas relevant to QI efforts within health care. Identified journals publish papers by both traditional and open access publication processes. Top 20 journals relevant to overall health care services ranked by impact factor: Journal Name Impact Factor CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS (supports open access) 137.578 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 59.558 LANCET (supports open access) 44.002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 37.684 NATURE MEDICINE 30.357 NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE 29.298 LANCET ONCOLOGY (supports open access) 26.509 LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES (supports open access) 21.372 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (supports open access) 20.982 BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (supports open access) 19.697 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY (supports open access) 17.759 CIRCULATION (supports open access) 17.202 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 16.593 LANCENT DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY (supports open access) 16.32 JAMA PSYCHIATRY 14.417 JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE 14.00 PLOS MEDICINE (open access) 13.585 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE 13.118 INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE (supports open access) 10.125 Top 20 journals relevant to quality improvement in health care ranked by impact factor: Journal Name Impact Factor NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 59.558 LANCET (supports open access) 44.002 JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL
    [Show full text]