DOCSLIB.ORG

Archaeological Survey and Historic Evaluation Report for the Jeerah Single Family Residential Project, 6231 East Wimbleton Cour

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Archaeological Survey and Historic Evaluation Report for the Jeerah Single Family Residential Project, 6231 East Wimbleton Cour ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY AND HISTORIC EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE JEERAH SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, 6231 EAST WIMBLETON COURT, CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA (APN 093-150-06-00) Prepared for: Mr. Yasir Kahf P. O. Box 2956 Corona, CA 92878 Prepared by: Laguna Mountain Environmental, Inc. 7969 Engineer Road, Suite 208 San Diego, CA 92111 ________________________________ Andrew R. Pigniolo, MA, RPA January 2016 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY AND HISTORIC EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE JEERAH SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, 6231 EAST WIMBLETON COURT, CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA (APN 093-150-06-00) Prepared for: Mr. Yasir Kahf P. O. Box 2956 Corona, CA 92878 Prepared by: Laguna Mountain Environmental, Inc. 7969 Engineer Road, Suite 208 San Diego, CA 92111 Andrew R. Pigniolo, MA, RPA January 2016 National Archaeological Data Base Information Type of Study: Cultural Resource Survey and Historic Resource Evaluation Sites: None USGS Quadrangle: Orange 7.5' Area: 2.08 Acres Key Words: City of Orange, 6231 East Wimbleton Court, Archaeological Survey, Historic Resource Evaluation, Redeposited Shell, Historic-age Structure TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................... iii I. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 A. Project Description...................................................................................................1 B. Project Personnel .....................................................................................................1 C. Structure of the Report .............................................................................................1 II. NATURAL AND CULTURAL SETTING .........................................................................5 A. Natural Setting .........................................................................................................5 B. Cultural Setting ........................................................................................................6 C. Prior Research ........................................................................................................10 III. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS .........................................................................11 A. Research Design.....................................................................................................11 B. Survey Methods .....................................................................................................11 IV. SURVEY RESULTS .........................................................................................................12 V. HISTORIC STRUCTURE EVALUATION ......................................................................16 A. Introduction ............................................................................................................16 B. Ownership and Occupation ....................................................................................16 C. Building Descriptions ............................................................................................17 VI. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS....................................................................26 VII. REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................27 APPENDICES A. Resume of Principal Investigator B. Record Search Confirmation C. Building, Structure, Object Forms D. Chain of Title Documents Jeerah Single Family Residential Project Cultural Resources Survey and Historic Evaluation Report Page i LIST OF FIGURES Number Title Page 1 Regional Location Map............................................................................................2 2 Project Location .......................................................................................................3 3 Project Plans.............................................................................................................4 4 Project Overviews ..................................................................................................13 5 Structure Locations ................................................................................................14 6 Well Overviews .....................................................................................................15 7 House Views, Front ...............................................................................................18 8 House Views, East .................................................................................................19 9 House Views, North ...............................................................................................20 10 House Views, South ...............................................................................................22 11 House Details .........................................................................................................23 12 Garage Overviews ..................................................................................................24 13 Garage Views, West...............................................................................................25 Jeerah Single Family Residential Project Cultural Resources Survey and Historic Evaluation Report Page ii Abstract ABSTRACT Laguna Mountain Environmental, Inc. conducted a cultural resource survey and historic structure evaluation for the proposed Jeerah Single Family Residential Project in the City of Orange. The survey included the entire project area, and the historic structure evaluation addressed the two standing structures within the project area. The cultural resource project included a records search, literature review, examination of historic maps, chain-of-title research, and the cultural resource survey of the project area. The current survey program was conducted in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and guidelines. The City of Orange will serve as lead agency for the project and CEQA compliance. A records search was conducted at the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton. The record search indicated that five cultural resources have been recorded within a one-half mile radius of the project area, but no resources are recorded in, or directly adjacent to the project. The project area has not been previously surveyed for cultural resources. Nine previous investigations have been conducted within one-half mile but none on or adjacent to the project area. A cultural resource survey of the project area was conducted on December 28, 2015 by Mr. Andrew R. Pigniolo. The survey included a surface walk-over of the entire project area in 5 to 10 m interval transects. The survey was constrained by the presence of fill soil over some areas while other areas were heavily graded and disturbed. Overall surface visibility averaged 70 percent with limited vegetation cover. Grading associated with past cut and fill activity was evident throughout the project. The survey resulted in the identification of moderate to small amounts of non-cultural marine shell in imported fill. A well whose current makeup is of recent age is also present on the property. No prehistoric or historic archaeological material was identified within the project area. Two structures of historic age (JS-H-1 and JS-H-2) were identified within the project area. These represent a single family residential structure and an associated garage. These structures were evaluated for historic significance. Based on a lack of integrity, insignificant design qualities, and lack of association with events or persons of historical significance, these structures were not recommended as eligible for the California Register of Historical resources (California Register) or local registers. Structures JS-H-1 and JS-H-2 do not qualify as significant under the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register) Guidelines used for CEQA review because of their lack of integrity and because they lack other criteria used for evaluating eligibility to the California Register. Significant impacts to cultural resources will not result from this project. Jeerah Single Family Residential Project Cultural Resources Survey and Historic Evaluation Report Page iii I. Introduction I. INTRODUCTION A. Project Description The 2.08 acre project area is located in the eastern portion of the City of Orange in Orange County (Figure 1). The project is located east of State Route (SR) 55 and south of Chapman Avenue. The project area is on the north side of Canyon View Avenue at 6231 East Wimbleton Court. It is located in the north east quarter of Section 35 in Township 4 South, Range 9 West. The project area is shown on the Orange USGS 7.5' Quadrangle (Figure 2) The proposed project is a residential development on the 2.08-acre project site. The project involves subdividing the approximately 91,476 sq. ft. parcel into eight (8) numbered lots and two lettered lots. Lot areas range from 6,000 sq. ft. to 16,000 sq. ft. The numbered lots will be developed with eight custom homes ranging in size from 3,000 sq. ft. to 3,800 sq. ft., including garages (Figure 3). Lot A will be developed with the clubhouse and associated common area; Lot B will be developed as a street and cul-de-sac. The project will be developed in two phases. The current survey and historic evaluation program was conducted in accordance with
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix D Phase I Cultural Resources Report
    Santiago Basin Saddle Repair Project Appendix D Phase I Cultural Resources Report Phase I Cultural Resources Report Orange County Water District Santiago Basins Saddle Improvement Project Prepared for Daniel Bott Principal Planner Orange County Water District 18700 Ward Street Fountain Valley, California 92708 Prepared by David M. Smith Patrick O. Maxon, M.A., RPA Cultural Resources Director BonTerra Psomas 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 200 Santa Ana, California 92707 T: 714.751.7373 April 2016 Phase I Cultural Resources Report Orange County Water District Santiago Basins Saddle Improvement Project Submitted by: David M. Smith Patrick O. Maxon, M.A., RPA Cultural Resources Director BonTerra Psomas 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 200 Santa Ana, California 92707-8794 (714) 751-7373 Submitted to: Daniel Bott Principal Planner Orange County Water District 18700 Ward Street Fountain Valley, California 92708 Key Words: Gabrieleno, 7.5 Minute Orange Quadrangle; T4S R9W Section 22 Santiago Basins Saddle Improvement Project TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Federal Legislative Framework ...................................................................................... 1 3.0 Project Location and Description .................................................................................. 2 3.1 Purpose and Need ................................................................................................ 2
    [Show full text]
  • Marywood High School
    CULTURAL and PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES SURVEY MARYWOOD HIGH SCHOOL City of Orange, Orange County, California CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES SURVEY MARYWOOD HIGH SCHOOL City of Orange, Orange County, California Prepared for: Peter K. Carlson Vandermost & Carlson, Inc. 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Prepared by: Jennifer Mermilliod, M.A., Principal JM Research & Consulting 5110 Magnolia Avenue Riverside, CA 92506 USGS Quadrangle: 7.5-minute Orange, California 1964, rev 1981 Unsectioned area of Township 4 South, Range 9 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian Marywood Logo Credit: Marywood Alumnae Association September 2014 J M R C SEPTEMBER 2014 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY JM Research & Consulting (JMRC) is under contract to Vandermost & Carlson, Inc. to provide cultural and paleontological resources services for the proposed Marywood project in the City of Orange, Orange County, California. The proposed project includes the demolition of Marywood, originally a parochial high school under the Archdiocese of Los Angeles and most recently a pastoral center for the Roman Catholic Diocese of Orange, and the construction of 40 single-family residences (Appendix B). The approximately 15-acre property is located on one parcel (361-064-01) at 2811 East Villa Real Drive in the foothills on the west side of the Peralta Hills, and is surrounded by post- WWII and later tract home development (Figure 1). The purpose of this report is to document efforts made to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Marywood is not listed in the City of Orange’s Historic Resources Inventory and does not appear to have been previously studied.
    [Show full text]
  • Sixty Years in Southern California, 1853-1913, Containing the Reminiscences of Harris Newmark
    Sixty years in Southern California, 1853-1913, containing the reminiscences of Harris Newmark. Edited by Maurice H. Newmark; Marco R. Newmark HARRIS NEWMARK AET. LXXIX SIXTY YEARS IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 1853-1913 CONTAINING THE REMINISCENCES OF HARRIS NEWMARK EDITED BY MAURICE H. NEWMARK MARCO R. NEWMARK Every generation enjoys the use of a vast hoard bequeathed to it by antiquity, and transmits that hoard, augmented by fresh acquisitions, to future ages. In these pursuits, therefore, the first speculators lie under great disadvantages, and, even when they fail, are entitled to praise.— MACAULAY. WITH 150 ILLUSTRATIONS Sixty years in Southern California, 1853-1913, containing the reminiscences of Harris Newmark. Edited by Maurice H. Newmark; Marco R. Newmark http://www.loc.gov/resource/calbk.023 NEW YORK THE KNICKERBOCKER PRESS 1916 Copyright, 1916 BY M. H. and M. R. NEWMARK v TO THE MEMORY OF MY WIFE v In Memoriam At the hour of high twelve on April the fourth, 1916, the sun shone into a room where lay the temporal abode, for eighty-one years and more, of the spirit of Harris Newmark. On his face still lingered that look of peace which betokens a life worthily used and gently relinquished. Many were the duties allotted him in his pilgrimage splendidly did he accomplish them! Providence permitted him the completion of his final task—a labor of love—but denied him the privilege of seeing it given to the community of his adoption. To him and to her, by whose side he sleeps, may it be both monument and epitaph. Thy will be done! M.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Resources Assessment Report
    HISTORIC RESOURCES ASSESSMENT REPORT of West Newport Oil Company Banning Ranch 1080 17th Street Newport Beach, CA APNs: 114-170-24, 114-070-43, 114-170-49, 114-170-50, 114-170-52, 114-170-56, 114-170-72114-170-73, 114-170-75, 114-170-77, 114-170-79, 114-117-83, 424-041-04 Prepared by Pamela Daly, M.S.H.P. Daly & Associates 4486 University Avenue Riverside, CA 92501 Prepared for: BonTerra Consulting 151 Kalmus, Suite E-200 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 July 2009 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This assessment report documents and evaluates the federal, state, and local significance and eligibility of the buildings and structures known as the West Newport Oil Company Banning Ranch, located on approximately 401 acres with the address of 1080 West 17th Street, Newport Beach, Orange County, California. The historic resource assessment and evaluation was conducted by Pamela Daly, M.S.H.P., Senior Architectural Historian. In order to identify and evaluate the subject property as a potential historic resource, a multi-step methodology was utilized. An inspection of the site and existing buildings and structures, combined with a review of local and regional historic archives regarding this parcel, were performed to document existing conditions and assist in assessing and evaluating the property for significance. In assessing the subject property’s historical significance federal, state, and local criteria were applied. The subject property is not currently listed on either the National Register or the California Register. Under the National Register or California Register criteria relating to the West Newport Oil Company Banning Ranch sites association with significant historical events that exemplifying broad patterns of our history, the subject property does not qualify as a significant resource.
    [Show full text]
  • The Max Bubeck Residence
    The Max Bubeck Residence A History Los Angeles, CA Prepared for: (Name Withheld Upon Request) Los Angeles, CA Max Bubeck Residence, Los Angeles, CA Introduction The Max Bubeck Residence is the result of two freethinking friends who came together to build a unique mid-century Modern residence in Los Angeles. In the early 1940’s Max H. Bubeck, a native Angeleno and innovator in early off-road motorcycling, purchased two unimproved lots in the still-developing Glassell Park. After some fifteen years owning the properties Max commissioned his good friend Allyn E. Morris to design a house. Though Mr. Bubeck was no “Modern design enthusiast,” he was clearly influenced by his friend. Max’s commission would be Morris’ first single-family home and a notable example of mid-century Modern. The Architectural Style Modernism is a mid-twentieth century architectural style that rejected ornament while addressing concern for functionalism by utilizing developing technologies to solve the architectural and urban planning problems of the period. The movement began in the 1920’s and 1930’s reconciling architecture to date with the modernization of society and technology but ultimately reached its zenith in the post World War II years. As a style Modernism is best known for its simplicity of form and use of industrially produced materials, as well as expressing structure with honesty. The Bubeck Residence takes this expression of structure to a somewhat atypical level, even for Modernism. Before Allyn Morris (See Figure 18, page 28) designed his own home and studio in Silver Lake (See Figure 19, page 29) he was commissioned to prepare plans for Max Bubeck’s residence.
    [Show full text]
  • My Seventy Years in California, 1857-1927, by J.A. Graves
    My seventy years in California, 1857-1927, by J.A. Graves MY SEVENTY YEARS IN CALIFORNIA J. A. GRAVES MY SEVENTY YEARS IN CALIFORNIA 1857-1927 By J. A. GRAVES President Farmers & Merchants National Bank of Los Angeles Los Angeles The TIMES-MIRROR Press 1927 COPYRIGHT, 1927 BY J. A. GRAVES My seventy years in California, 1857-1927, by J.A. Graves http://www.loc.gov/resource/calbk.095 LOVINGLY DEDICATED TO MY WIFE ALICE H. GRAVES PREFACE Time flies so swiftly, that I can hardly realize so many years have elapsed since I, a child five years of age, passed through the Golden Gate, to become a resident of California. I have always enjoyed reading of the experiences of California pioneers, who came here either before or after I did. The thought came to me, that possibly other people would enjoy an account of the experiences of my seventy years in the State, during which I participated in the occurrences of a very interesting period of the State's development. As, during all of my life, to think has been to act, this is the only excuse or apology I can offer for this book. J. A. GRAVES. ix CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I FAMILY HISTORY. MARYSVILLE IN 1857. COL. JIM HOWARTH 3 II MARYSVILLE BAR IN 1857. JUDGE STEPHEN J. FIELD ITS LEADER. GEN. GEO. N. ROWE. PLACERVILLE BAR AN ABLE ONE 13 III FARMING IN EARLY DAYS IN CALIFORNIA. HOW WE LIVED. DEMOCRATIC CELEBRATION AT MARYSVILLE DURING THE LINCOLN-MCCLELLAN CAMPAIGN 25 IV SPORT WITH GREYHOUNDS. MY FIRST AND LAST POKER GAME 36 V MOVING FROM MARYSVILLE TO SAN MATEO COUNTY 39 VI HOW WE LIVED IN SAN MATEO COUNTY 43 VII BEGINNING OF MY EDUCATION 46 VIII REV.
    [Show full text]
  • Iference :N from LIBRA
    ARX iFERENCE :N FROM LIBRA ORANGE COUN HISTORY (REFERENCE PAMPHLET FI '1" 1769, while.'the ~mericaniilonies Nor was Portola very opti~nisticabout There were prohnbly almul I5.0oO In- - were moving toward war with the Brit- the condition tlie 63 soldiers, muleteers dians in .what is today Orange County, ish, the crowned head .of another Euro- and two priests who .yould march to Monterey. living in villages of 500 to 1,000 popula- pean power, King Carlos 111 or Spain. tion. They had no horses, no cattle, no They were, he later wrote, "skeletons uneasily eyed the growing British milit- grain. They lived on acorns and an ,ary,migration as far west as the Missis- occasional rabbit and were thought by .sippr,,,%lley. He was well aware that it ,.. - Ail ~-,~alStories the expedition as well as the many . coul$:spreafl .-to :the ' Rockies; even the . .. , . Spaniards who later came to this area to Pzcific, .. coast.;. , i5: : B$ DAVEROSE be a generally lazy and worthless lot. .:!;With the~paniardsfirmly, entrenched . Reg[ster, statf Writer Father Crespi was more than a .litllc in: Mexico, 'King Carlos looked .upon the impressed when he came upon what hc ' PaCific ' Coast '.-:.:particularly., what, is ~ , . was to name the valley of San Juan ~110'had ben spared from scurvy. : today. the ,state of 'California ,+ as , a Capistrano (for Italian Saint John of natural extension'bf thk Spanish domain hullper and thirst." Capistrano). IG, in North .America. -' '04' july ,tl~e..espedition,left San . 'The growing westward migration Diego with 10 soldiers in the vanguard (Continued On Page 12) the British, he felt, was a tllrcal to led .by a ,scout, sergeant Spanish designs.
    [Show full text]
  • OUR FAMILY TREE and Its Many Branches November 1988
    OUR FAMILY TREE and its many branches november 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS Families: Brown 1 Markel 7 Parker 15 Blaine 42 Meyer 62 Segerstrom 90 McMurray 102 Sutfin 131 Kohlmeier 142 Beale - 151 Hite Family 167 Armstrong - Lyon 193 Mead - Bateson 212 Washington 226 Ord - Cresap families aft 256 Mead - Parker 289 index —j ' BATE MICROF/LMED I ///Vf/ / ITEM *_Z£L PROJECT"?/id G RGi L ?r M-L # FAMILY M'STORY LIBRARY \fL/07<-/4P ^^>«r, 35 NOR •>i WFST TEMPLE r< SALT LAlxE CITY, UTAH 84150 HERITAGE We speak of our forbears in old and worn cliches, As stalwart, silent men whose numbered days Were spent in ceaseless, unremitting toil Eking a living from New England soil. We think of them waiting for the call to arms, Fighting to save their families and farms; We picture the furrow where the dropped plough lies, The women watching them go with quiet eyes. Is it because they died so many springs Ago that we forget the other things They did from day to day? They must have wept, Laughed, talked of the future. I think they kept Their dreams tended as gently as their corn, And planned great things for children yet unborn. And as I watch the spring unfold each year, I think that they held beauty almost as dear As freedom. The battle won, they heeded her command, And planted dogwood in their promised land. DOROTHY JOSLIN ©1976 Introduction Our Family and its Many Branches is genealogy of an entire family, admittedly as yet incomplete. It is the genealogy of the various branches, also incomplete.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Specific Plan Amendment # 7 Draft to March 2015 Amendment #7 Submittal
    C O M P A R E D OC: C U R R E N T S P A 7 T O M A R C H 2015 S UBMITTAL 1 I NTRODUCTION 1.1 HISTORY OF CITY OF ORANGE AND CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY A portionThe core of the Chapman University campus is located within the Old Towne District of the City of Orange. The City of Orange dates back to 1869, when Alfred Chapman and Andrew Glassell accepted land from the Rancho Santiago de Santa Ana land grant for their fees in a complicated lawsuit involving the family of Jose Antonio Yorba. Although Alfred Chapman later called himself the “father of Orange,” development of the town was, in fact, guided by William Glassell, brother of Andrew Glassell. He laid out a one-square-mile town, with 10-acre farm lots surrounding a 40-acre central town site. The boundaries of the town were Walnut (now Maple) and Almond Avenues to the north and south, and Grape (now Grand) and Lemon Streets to the east and west. The intersection at the center of the town site, which became known as the Plaza, was formed by Chapman Avenue and Glassell Street. In 1880, the Southern Pacific Railroad built a depot in Orange. That same year, the Santa Fe Railroad extended its railway into the City. The Santa Fe Depot served the City for over 80 years as a freight and passenger facility until its closure in 1971. The competing fares of the two railways helped initiate the boom of the 1880s, when profitable crops brought in new businesses to serve the needs of farmers.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER of HISTORIC PLACES CONTINUATION SHEET Section P
    NFS Form 10-900a OMBNo. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES CONTINUATION SHEET Section Page SUPPLEMENTARY LISTING RECORD NRIS Reference Number: 07000309 Date Listed: 4/13/2007 Glassell Park Elementary School Los Angeles CA Property Name County State N/A Multiple Name This property is listed in the National Register of Historic Places in accordance with the attached nomination documentation subject to the following exceptions, exclusions, or amendments, notwithstanding the National Park Service certification included in the nomination documentation. Amended eems in Nomination: Significance: Social History is added as an area of significance under Criterion A. [Social History reflects the school's importance as an illustration of the city's substantial efforts at promoting safe, modern educational facilities and programs during the historic period. In addition to resulting in an unique architectural type, the program was an important component of the city's development of civic infrastructure to promote the welfare of local citizens.] Verbal Boundary Description/Justification: The verbal boundary is amended to add: The actual nominated area, as noted on the attached sketch map, conforms to the basic footprint of the 1924/1935 building and its immediate landscaping and excludes the non-historic (1951) cafeteria, modern prefabricated classrooms, and playground areas to the rear of the historic lot. The verbal boundary justification is amended to read: The nominated boundary includes that portion of the historic school lot that retain integrity from the period of significance, while excluding non-historic and modern intrusions. These clarifications were confirmed with the CA SHPO office.
    [Show full text]
  • Surveyla Survey Report Template
    Historic Resources Survey Report Northeast Los Angeles River Revitalization Area Prepared for: City of Los Angeles Community Redevelopment Agency Prepared by: HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP Pasadena, CA Galvin Preservation Associates June 2012 Table of Contents Project Overview 1 Survey Methodology Summary 1 Project Team 3 Survey Area 3 Designated Resources 6 Historical Overview 7 Selected Chronology 34 Survey Methodology 38 Survey Results 39 Research Sources 64 Appendices Appendix A: Individual Resources Appendix B: Non-Parcel Resources Appendix C: Historic Districts Historic Resources Survey Northeast Los Angeles River Revitalization Area Project Overview This historic resources survey report (“Survey Report”) has been completed on behalf of the former Los Angeles Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) for the Northeast Los Angeles River Revitalization Project Area (NELA). This project was conducted from October 2011 to March 2012 by Historic Resources Group (HRG) and Galvin Preservation Associates (GPA). This Survey Report provides a summary of the work completed, including a description of the survey area; an historic context statement for the survey area; an overview of the field methodology; a summary of relevant contexts, themes, and property types; and a complete list of all surveyed resources. The NELA historic resources survey was conducted following SurveyLA methodology and using SurveyLA proprietary technology. This Survey Report is intended to be used in conjunction with the SurveyLA Field Results Master Report (“Master Report”) which provides a detailed discussion of SurveyLA methodology and explains the terms used in this report and associated appendices. In addition, a Survey Results Map has been prepared which graphically illustrates the boundaries of the survey area and the location and type of all resources identified during the field survey.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Portfolio Punkaj Raj
    PLANNING PORTFOLIO PUNKAJ RAJ CALIFORNIA STATE POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY, POMONA MAJOR: URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING EMPHASIS: URBAN DESIGN MINOR: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE TABLE OF CONTENTS ORANGE, CA: AN ADDENDUM TO ITS HISTORICAL CONTEXT PAGE A02 GARFIELD PARK: ACTIVATING PUBLIC SPACES PAGE B12 DOWNTOWN ONTARIO, CA: FOOD AND BUSINESS HUB PAGE C22 PG 01 URP 3350: PLAN MAKING HISTORY AND FUTURE GROUP PROJECT The current built environment is a reflection of past Since this was a group project, each focused on a development decisions, while the planning principles section such history, land use, transportation, and are statements of how the community has grown economic development. I was responsible for the and decisions about land use that it has made. history portion as well as putting together the final However, in many cases, the focus on the future text, laying out the document and sourcing leads to a failure to describe and analyze the past. historical materials such as maps and images. My The goal of this assignment was for us to examine portion of the content is in blue. the historical section of a community plan and rewrite/improve it, as well as design a pamphlet to educate your community about it. A02_ORANGE, CA: AN ADDENDUM TO ITS HISTORICAL CONTEXT Figure 1. Bracamontes home on Center Street in El Modena, California, 1905, Source: Orange Public Library and History Center ORANGE, CA AN ADDENDUM TO ITS HISTORICAL CONTEXT GROUP 04: UBALDO H., ALEXIS L., PUNKAJ R., ALEX S., JEREMY S. PG A03 The City of Orange, historically, has dealt with segregation and discrimination towards its Hispanic population.
    [Show full text]