DOCSLIB.ORG

Fernvale Site Report Is an Edited Work That Presents the Results of Analysis by Multiple Contributors

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fernvale Site Report Is an Edited Work That Presents the Results of Analysis by Multiple Contributors FERNVALE (40WM51) A LATE ARCHAIC OCCUPATION ALONG THE SOUTH HARPETH RIVER IN WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE Edited by Aaron Deter-Wolf FERNVALE (40WM51): A LATE ARCHAIC OCCUPATION ALONG THE SOUTH HARPETH RIVER IN WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE Edited by Aaron Deter-Wolf With Contributions By: Andrea Shea Bishop C. Brady Davis Lacey S. Flemming Andrew Gillreath-Brown Shannon C. Hodge Teresa Ingalls Robert L. Jolley Tanya M. Peres Benjamin A. Steere Jesse W. Tune An electronic version of this report is available online at: http://www.tn.gov/environment/arch/ TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION OF ARCHAEOLOGY RESEARCH SERIES NO. 19 2013 Cover Images: Top, view of excavations at Fernvale in May, 1985, facing southeast. Bottom, marine shell gorget and beads from Feature 71. Pursuant to the State of Tennessee’s Policy of non-discrimination, the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation does not discriminate on the basis of race, sex, religion, color, national or ethnic origin, age, disability, or military service in its policies, or in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in its programs, services or activities. Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action inquiries or complaints should be directed to the EEO/AA Coordinator, Office of General Counsel, 401 Church Street, 20th Floor L & C Tower, Nashville, TN 37243, 1-888-867-7455. ADA inquiries or complaints should be directed to the ADA Coordinator, Human Resources Division, 401 Church Street, 12th Floor L & C Tower, Nashville, TN 37243, 1-866-253-5827. Hearing impaired callers may use the Tennessee Relay Service (1-800-848- 0298). Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, Authorization No. 327379, 300 copies. This public document was promulgated at cost of $12.62 per copy. April 2013 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................. vi LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................ viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................... ix I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1 II. PROJECT HISTORY ........................................................................................ 3 Phase II Testing, 1984 ..................................................................................... 3 Data Recovery, 1985 ....................................................................................... 6 Reanalysis and Completion, 2007–2012 ......................................................... 9 III. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ........................................................................ 13 Physiography ................................................................................................. 13 Hydrology ...................................................................................................... 15 Soils ............................................................................................................... 16 Raw Material and Natural Resource Availability ............................................ 17 IV. ARCHAEOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK ............................................................. 19 Previous Archaeological Investigations ......................................................... 19 Prehistoric Occupation of the South Harpeth River Watershed ..................... 21 Archaeological Setting ................................................................................... 25 V. PIT FEATURES .............................................................................................. 29 Feature Classification .................................................................................... 29 Feature Stratigraphy ...................................................................................... 35 Distinctive Features and Deposits ................................................................. 39 Feature 24 ................................................................................................ 39 Feature 58 ................................................................................................ 40 Feature 71 ................................................................................................ 40 Feature 93 ................................................................................................ 42 Burial 24 ................................................................................................... 42 Cultural Affiliations ......................................................................................... 45 VI. POSTHOLES AND STRUCTURES ............................................................... 49 Posthole Features ......................................................................................... 49 Structures ...................................................................................................... 51 Structure 1 ................................................................................................ 51 Structure 2 ................................................................................................ 58 Structure 3 ................................................................................................ 63 Structure Summary .................................................................................. 65 VII. RADIOCARBON DATES .............................................................................. 67 Discussion ..................................................................................................... 68 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) VIII. LITHIC MATERIALS .................................................................................... 73 Debitage and Other Lithic Materials .............................................................. 73 Raw Material Types ................................................................................. 73 Other Lithic Materials ............................................................................... 74 Lithic Tools .................................................................................................... 75 Bifaces ..................................................................................................... 76 Projectile Points ....................................................................................... 76 Additional Lithic Tools .............................................................................. 88 Discussion ..................................................................................................... 89 IX. CERAMIC ARTIFACT ANALYSIS ................................................................. 93 Limestone-Tempered Ceramics .................................................................... 94 Shell-Tempered Ceramics ............................................................................. 95 Unideifiable Temper ...................................................................................... 95 Discussion ..................................................................................................... 95 X. FAUNAL ASSEMBLAGE ................................................................................ 99 Methods ......................................................................................................... 99 Zooarchaeological Data ................................................................................. 99 Non-Mortuary/Non-Structural Features .................................................. 100 Structures ............................................................................................... 100 Dog Burials ............................................................................................. 102 Faunal Remains Associated with Human Burials ................................... 103 Modified Faunal Remains....................................................................... 107 Discussion ................................................................................................... 110 XI. ARCHAEOBOTANICAL ANNALYSIS ......................................................... 115 Plant Food ................................................................................................... 115 Nuts ........................................................................................................ 115 Seeds ..................................................................................................... 116 Plant Food Seasonal Variability ............................................................. 116 Wood Charcoal ........................................................................................... 117 Discussion ................................................................................................... 117 XII. BIOARCHAEOLOGICAL ANALYSIS.......................................................... 121 Methods ....................................................................................................... 121 Burial Descriptions ....................................................................................... 123 Burials 1a, 1b, and 1c ............................................................................ 123 Burial 2 ................................................................................................... 123 Burial 3 ..................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cherokee Ethnogenesis in Southwestern North Carolina
    The following chapter is from: The Archaeology of North Carolina: Three Archaeological Symposia Charles R. Ewen – Co-Editor Thomas R. Whyte – Co-Editor R. P. Stephen Davis, Jr. – Co-Editor North Carolina Archaeological Council Publication Number 30 2011 Available online at: http://www.rla.unc.edu/NCAC/Publications/NCAC30/index.html CHEROKEE ETHNOGENESIS IN SOUTHWESTERN NORTH CAROLINA Christopher B. Rodning Dozens of Cherokee towns dotted the river valleys of the Appalachian Summit province in southwestern North Carolina during the eighteenth century (Figure 16-1; Dickens 1967, 1978, 1979; Perdue 1998; Persico 1979; Shumate et al. 2005; Smith 1979). What developments led to the formation of these Cherokee towns? Of course, native people had been living in the Appalachian Summit for thousands of years, through the Paleoindian, Archaic, Woodland, and Mississippi periods (Dickens 1976; Keel 1976; Purrington 1983; Ward and Davis 1999). What are the archaeological correlates of Cherokee culture, when are they visible archaeologically, and what can archaeology contribute to knowledge of the origins and development of Cherokee culture in southwestern North Carolina? Archaeologists, myself included, have often focused on the characteristics of pottery and other artifacts as clues about the development of Cherokee culture, which is a valid approach, but not the only approach (Dickens 1978, 1979, 1986; Hally 1986; Riggs and Rodning 2002; Rodning 2008; Schroedl 1986a; Wilson and Rodning 2002). In this paper (see also Rodning 2009a, 2010a, 2011b), I focus on the development of Cherokee towns and townhouses. Given the significance of towns and town affiliations to Cherokee identity and landscape during the 1700s (Boulware 2011; Chambers 2010; Smith 1979), I suggest that tracing the development of towns and townhouses helps us understand Cherokee ethnogenesis, more generally.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle and Late Archaic Mortuary Patterning: an Example from the Western Tennessee Valley
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-1977 Middle and Late Archaic Mortuary Patterning: An Example from the Western Tennessee Valley Ann L. Magennis University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Magennis, Ann L., "Middle and Late Archaic Mortuary Patterning: An Example from the Western Tennessee Valley. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1977. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/1340 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Ann L. Magennis entitled "Middle and Late Archaic Mortuary Patterning: An Example from the Western Tennessee Valley." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Fred H. Smith, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: William M. Bass, Richard L. Jantz, Charles H. Faulkner Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Ann L.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: Introduction
    SEGMENTED AND ASCENDANT CHIEFDOM POLITY AS VIEWED FROM THE DIVERS SITE BY GLEN ALOIS FREIMUTH DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2010 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Emeritus R. Barry Lewis, Chair Professor Timothy R. Pauketat Adjunct Professor Thomas E. Emerson Associate Professor Mark W. Mehrer, Northern Illinois University ABSTRACT This study contributes to our understanding of the nature of political control exerted by the Mississippian Cahokia polity over small rural villages in the southern American Bottom. Currently two models, which I call the Segmented and Ascendant Chiefdoms, respectively, provide contrasting explanations of the nature and amount of Cahokia control over rural villages. I examine the fit of these models against archaeological data from the Divers and other regional sites. The analyses range over several main topics, including populations, labor requirements, nonlocal artifacts, provisioning, and rituals. I find that the archaeological patterns expressed at the Divers site best fit a Segmented Chiefdom model wherein political control is decentralized and rural villages retain a high degree of political autonomy. Cahokia, as the American Bottom’s main Mississippian town, has the largest population, physical size, elite status items, and monumental construction which I describe as material domination and political dominance. Political dominance requires manipulation of local leaders and their followers for political and social control and this manipulation was expressed through ritual materials and rituals performed at Cahokia and other mound towns. The Cahokia elite created new rituals and associated material expressions through collective action and attempted to gain control of existing commoner ritual performances and symbols but these and political autonomy largely remained with the commoners who occupied small villages like Divers.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Athens, Georgia
    SOUTHEASTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS & ABSTRACTS OF THE 73RD ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 26-29, 2016 ATHENS, GEORGIA BULLETIN 59 2016 BULLETIN 59 2016 PROCEEDINGS & ABSTRACTS OF THE 73RD ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 26-29, 2016 THE CLASSIC CENTER ATHENS, GEORGIA Meeting Organizer: Edited by: Hosted by: Cover: © Southeastern Archaeological Conference 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS THE CLASSIC CENTER FLOOR PLAN……………………………………………………...……………………..…... PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………………………….…..……. LIST OF DONORS……………………………………………………………………………………………….…..……. SPECIAL THANKS………………………………………………………………………………………….….....……….. SEAC AT A GLANCE……………………………………………………………………………………….……….....…. GENERAL INFORMATION & SPECIAL EVENTS SCHEDULE…………………….……………………..…………... PROGRAM WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 26…………………………………………………………………………..……. THURSDAY, OCTOBER 27……………………………………………………………………………...…...13 FRIDAY, OCTOBER 28TH……………………………………………………………….……………....…..21 SATURDAY, OCTOBER 29TH…………………………………………………………….…………....…...28 STUDENT PAPER COMPETITION ENTRIES…………………………………………………………………..………. ABSTRACTS OF SYMPOSIA AND PANELS……………………………………………………………..…………….. ABSTRACTS OF WORKSHOPS…………………………………………………………………………...…………….. ABSTRACTS OF SEAC STUDENT AFFAIRS LUNCHEON……………………………………………..…..……….. SEAC LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS FOR 2016…………………….……………….…….…………………. Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 59, 2016 ConferenceRooms CLASSIC CENTERFLOOR PLAN 6 73rd Annual Meeting, Athens, Georgia EVENT LOCATIONS Baldwin Hall Baldwin Hall 7 Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin
    [Show full text]
  • HOVASAURUS BOULEI, an AQUATIC EOSUCHIAN from the UPPER PERMIAN of MADAGASCAR by P.J
    99 Palaeont. afr., 24 (1981) HOVASAURUS BOULEI, AN AQUATIC EOSUCHIAN FROM THE UPPER PERMIAN OF MADAGASCAR by P.J. Currie Provincial Museum ofAlberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T5N OM6, Canada ABSTRACT HovasauTUs is the most specialized of four known genera of tangasaurid eosuchians, and is the most common vertebrate recovered from the Lower Sakamena Formation (Upper Per­ mian, Dzulfia n Standard Stage) of Madagascar. The tail is more than double the snout-vent length, and would have been used as a powerful swimming appendage. Ribs are pachyostotic in large animals. The pectoral girdle is low, but massively developed ventrally. The front limb would have been used for swimming and for direction control when swimming. Copious amounts of pebbles were swallowed for ballast. The hind limbs would have been efficient for terrestrial locomotion at maturity. The presence of long growth series for Ho vasaurus and the more terrestrial tan~saurid ThadeosauTUs presents a unique opportunity to study differences in growth strategies in two closely related Permian genera. At birth, the limbs were relatively much shorter in Ho vasaurus, but because of differences in growth rates, the limbs of Thadeosau­ rus are relatively shorter at maturity. It is suggested that immature specimens of Ho vasauTUs spent most of their time in the water, whereas adults spent more time on land for mating, lay­ ing eggs and/or range dispersal. Specilizations in the vertebrae and carpus indicate close re­ lationship between Youngina and the tangasaurids, but eliminate tangasaurids from consider­ ation as ancestors of other aquatic eosuchians, archosaurs or sauropterygians. CONTENTS Page ABREVIATIONS . ..... ... ......... .......... ... ......... ..... ... ..... .. .... 101 INTRODUCTION .
    [Show full text]
  • Laryngology and Otology
    The Journal of Laryngology and Otology {Founded in 1887 by MORRELL MACKENZIE OK^NORRIS WOI.FF.NDFN) November 1978 Infratemporal fossa approach to tumours of the temporal bone and base of the skull* By U. FISCH (Zurich) IN spite of the translabyrinthine and middle cranial fossa approaches, tumours situated in the infralabyrinthine and apical regions of the pyramid and surrounding portions of the base of the skull remain a surgical chal- lenge for neurosurgeons and otolaryngologists as well. The transpalatal- transpharyngeal route proposed by Mullan et al. (1966) and the trans- cochlear approach of House and Hitselberger (1976) do not provide adequate exposure for large glomus jugulare tumours, clivus chordomas, cholesteatomas and carcinomas invading the pyramid tip and skull base. The proper management of these lesions requires a larger approach per- mitting exposure of the internal carotid artery from the carotid foramen to the cavernous sinus (Fig. 1). The infratemporal fossa exposure presented in this paper is a possible solution to this problem. The basic features of the proposed lateral approach to the skull base are: (a) the permanent anterior displacement of the facial nerve, (b) the subluxation or permanent resection of the mandibular condyle, (c) the temporary displacement of the zygomatic arch, and (d) the subtotal petrosectomy with obliteration of the middle ear cleft. Three different types of infratemporal fossa approach have developed from the experience gained in 51 patients. They will be described and illustrated with typical cases. Surgical technique The realization of the infratemporal fossa approach to the pyramid tip and base of the skull has been hampered by difficulties in handling the following structures (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Ordovician and Silurian Stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley and Parts of the Adjacent Valley and Ridge, Tennessee
    Upper Ordovician and Silurian Stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley and Parts of the Adjacent Valley and Ridge, Tennessee GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 996 Prepared in cooperation with the Tennessee Division of Geology Upper Ordovician and Silurian Stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley and Parts of the Adjacent Valley and Ridge, Tennessee By ROBERT C. MILICI and HELMUTH WEDOW, JR. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 996 Prepared in cooperation with the Tennessee Division of Geology UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 1977 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Milici, Robert C 1931- Upper Ordovician and Silurian stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley and parts of the adjacent valley and ridge, Tennessee. (Geological Survey professional paper; 996) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.16:996 1. Geology, Stratigraphic--Ordovician. 2. Geology, Stratigraphic--Silurian. 3. Geology--Tennessee--Sequatchie Valley. 4. Geology--Tennessee--Chattanooga region. I. Wedow, Helmuth, 1917- joint author. II: Title. Upper Ordovician and Silurian stratigraphy in Sequatchie Valley .... III. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Professional paper; 996. QE660.M54 551.7'310976877 76-608170 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-03002·1 CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 Introduction -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Craniofacial Morphology of Simosuchus Clarki (Crocodyliformes: Notosuchia) from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar
    Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Memoir 10 Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology Volume 30, Supplement to Number 6: 13–98, November 2010 © 2010 by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology CRANIOFACIAL MORPHOLOGY OF SIMOSUCHUS CLARKI (CROCODYLIFORMES: NOTOSUCHIA) FROM THE LATE CRETACEOUS OF MADAGASCAR NATHAN J. KLEY,*,1 JOSEPH J. W. SERTICH,1 ALAN H. TURNER,1 DAVID W. KRAUSE,1 PATRICK M. O’CONNOR,2 and JUSTIN A. GEORGI3 1Department of Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, 11794-8081, U.S.A., [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 2Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ohio University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, Ohio 45701, U.S.A., [email protected]; 3Department of Anatomy, Arizona College of Osteopathic Medicine, Midwestern University, Glendale, Arizona 85308, U.S.A., [email protected] ABSTRACT—Simosuchus clarki is a small, pug-nosed notosuchian crocodyliform from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. Originally described on the basis of a single specimen including a remarkably complete and well-preserved skull and lower jaw, S. clarki is now known from five additional specimens that preserve portions of the craniofacial skeleton. Collectively, these six specimens represent all elements of the head skeleton except the stapedes, thus making the craniofacial skeleton of S. clarki one of the best and most completely preserved among all known basal mesoeucrocodylians. In this report, we provide a detailed description of the entire head skeleton of S. clarki, including a portion of the hyobranchial apparatus. The two most complete and well-preserved specimens differ substantially in several size and shape variables (e.g., projections, angulations, and areas of ornamentation), suggestive of sexual dimorphism.
    [Show full text]
  • A Spatial and Elemental Analyses of the Ceramic Assemblage at Mialoquo (40Mr3), an Overhill Cherokee Town in Monroe County, Tennessee
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-2019 COALESCED CHEROKEE COMMUNITIES IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY: A SPATIAL AND ELEMENTAL ANALYSES OF THE CERAMIC ASSEMBLAGE AT MIALOQUO (40MR3), AN OVERHILL CHEROKEE TOWN IN MONROE COUNTY, TENNESSEE Christian Allen University of Tennessee, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Recommended Citation Allen, Christian, "COALESCED CHEROKEE COMMUNITIES IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY: A SPATIAL AND ELEMENTAL ANALYSES OF THE CERAMIC ASSEMBLAGE AT MIALOQUO (40MR3), AN OVERHILL CHEROKEE TOWN IN MONROE COUNTY, TENNESSEE. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2019. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/5572 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Christian Allen entitled "COALESCED CHEROKEE COMMUNITIES IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY: A SPATIAL AND ELEMENTAL ANALYSES OF THE CERAMIC ASSEMBLAGE AT MIALOQUO (40MR3), AN OVERHILL CHEROKEE TOWN IN MONROE COUNTY, TENNESSEE." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Kandace Hollenbach, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Gerald Schroedl, Julie Reed Accepted for the Council: Dixie L.
    [Show full text]
  • Records from the Aalenian–Bajocian of Patagonia (Argentina): an Overview
    Geol. Mag.: page 1 of 11. c Cambridge University Press 2013 1 doi:10.1017/S0016756813000058 Ophthalmosaurian (Ichthyosauria) records from the Aalenian–Bajocian of Patagonia (Argentina): an overview ∗ MARTA S. FERNÁNDEZ † & MARIANELLA TALEVI‡ ∗ División Palaeontología Vertebrados, Museo de La Plata, Paseo del Bosque s/n, 1900 La Plata, Argentina. CONICET ‡Instituto de Investigación en Paleobiología y Geología, Universidad Nacional de Río Negro, 8332 General Roca, Río Negro, Argentina. CONICET (Received 12 September 2012; accepted 11 January 2013) Abstract – The oldest ophthalmosaurian records worldwide have been recovered from the Aalenian– Bajocian boundary of the Neuquén Basin in Central-West Argentina (Mendoza and Neuquén provinces). Although scarce, they document a poorly known period in the evolutionary history of parvipelvian ichthyosaurs. In this contribution we present updated information on these fossils, including a phylogenetic analysis, and a redescription of ‘Stenopterygius grandis’ Cabrera, 1939. Patagonian ichthyosaur occurrences indicate that during the Bajocian the Neuquén Basin palaeogulf, on the southern margins of the Palaeopacific Ocean, was inhabited by at least three morphologically discrete taxa: the slender Stenopterygius cayi, robust ophthalmosaurian Mollesaurus periallus and another indeterminate ichthyosaurian. Rib bone tissue structure indicates that rib cages of Bajocian ichthyosaurs included forms with dense rib microstructure (Mollesaurus) and forms with an ‘osteoporotic-like’ pattern (Stenopterygius cayi). Keywords: Mollesaurus,‘Stenopterygius grandis’, Middle Jurassic, Neuquén Basin, Argentina. 1. Introduction all Callovian and post-Callovian ichthyosaurs, two different Early Jurassic taxa have been proposed as Ichthyosaurs were one of the main predators in the ophthalmosaurian sister taxa: Stenopterygius (Maisch oceans all over the world during most of the Mesozoic & Matzke, 2000; Sander, 2000; Druckenmiller & (Massare, 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • History, Monumentality, and Interaction in the Appalachian Summit Middle Woodland
    Archived version from NCDOCKS Institutional Repository http://libres.uncg.edu/ir/asu/ History, Monumentality, And Interaction In The Appalachian Summit Middle Woodland By: Alice P. Wright Abstract The Middle Woodland period in eastern North America witnessed a florescence of monumental architecture and material exchange linked to widespread networks of ritual interaction. Although these networks encompassed large geographic areas and persisted for several centuries, extant archaeological models have tended to characterize Middle Woodland interaction as an historically unitary process. Using new data from the Garden Creek site in North Carolina, I argue that these frameworks obscure important historical shifts in Middle Woodland interaction. Recent collections-based research, geophysical survey, targeted excavation, and 14C dating (including Bayesian modeling) of this site reveal two coeval diachronic changes: a shift from geometric earthwork construction to platform mound construction; and a shift from the production of special artifacts (mica, crystal quartz) to the consumption of exotic artifacts in association with platform mound ceremonialism. These data hint at important changes in interregional relationships between the Appalachian Summit, the Hopewellian Midwest, and the greater Southeast during the Middle Woodland period, and provide a springboard for considering how processes of culture contact contributed to precolumbian cultural change. Wright, A. (2014). History, Monumentality, and Interaction in the Appalachian Summit Middle Woodland. American Antiquity, 79(2), 277-294. doi:10.7183/0002-7316.79.2.277. Publisher version of record available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-antiquity/article/history-monumentality-and- interaction-in-the-appalachian-summit-middle-woodland/8A6ABDE3030E29F367568A0F24692AD9 HISTORY, MONUMENTALITY, AND INTERACTION IN THE APPALACHIAN SUMMIT MIDDLE WOODLAND Alice P.
    [Show full text]
  • Bladelet Polish: a Lithic Analysis of Spracklen (33GR1585), an Upland Hopewell Campsite
    Illinois State University ISU ReD: Research and eData Theses and Dissertations 5-19-2018 Bladelet Polish: a lithic analysis of Spracklen (33GR1585), an upland Hopewell campsite Tyler R. E. Heneghan Illinois State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, and the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Heneghan, Tyler R. E., "Bladelet Polish: a lithic analysis of Spracklen (33GR1585), an upland Hopewell campsite" (2018). Theses and Dissertations. 928. https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd/928 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ISU ReD: Research and eData. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ISU ReD: Research and eData. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BLADELET POLISH: A LITHIC ANALYSIS OF SPRACKLEN (33GR1585), AN UPLAND HOPEWELL CAMPSITE TYLER R. E. HENEGHAN 107 Pages This thesis builds upon recent investigations at Spracklen (33GR1585), a small upland site in Greene County, Ohio. The presence of non-local cherts, bladelets, and bladelet cores indicates a Middle Woodland Ohio Hopewell occupation. Raw material sourcing, debitage analyses, and a use-wear analysis uncovered that Spracklen functioned as a logistical hunting campsite. Its people utilized bladelets for butchery and hide-working processes. This information provides new insights into Hopewellian life in the uplands and its place within Hopewell community organization. KEYWORDS: Settlement patterns, Hopewell, Bladelets, Use-wear, GIS BLADELET POLISH: A LITHIC ANALYSIS OF SPRACKLEN (33GR1585), AN UPLAND HOPEWELL CAMPSITE TYLER R.
    [Show full text]