DOCSLIB.ORG

Terminal Evaluation Report of the COBWEB Project- Nov

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Terminal Evaluation Report of the COBWEB Project- Nov EXTERNAL–TERMINAL EVALUATION EXTENDING WETLAND PROTECTED AREAS THROUGH COMMUNITY COSERVATION INITIATIVES [COBWEB] PIMS NO: 1610 PROJECT ID: 00055951 DURATION: 2008-2013 [5 YEARS, ONE-YEAR NO-COST EXTENSION DUE TO LATE START] EVALUATION TIME-FRAME: OCTOBER-NOVEMBER 2013 COUNTRY: UGANDA GEF OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME / STRATEGIC PROGRAMME: Coastal, Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems IMPLEMENTING PARTNERS Wetlands Management Department District Local Governments IUCN Nature Uganda Uganda Wildlife Society EVALUATION TEAM Dr. Chaudhry Inayatullah [[email protected]] Team Leader Dr. Willy Kakuru [[email protected]] National Consultant ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Communities in Community Conservation Areas; District Government staff, especially Chief Administrative Officers, Community Development Officers, Forest Officers, District Environmental Officers, UNDP, implementing partners and members of the project board. KAMPALA, 28 November 2013 Terminal Evaluation Report of the COBWEB Project- Nov. 2013 ACRONYMS APR Annual Project Report BTC Belgium Technical Cooperation CAO Chief Administrative Officer CBD Convention on Biodiversity CBO Community Based Organization CCA Community Conservation Area CECF Community Environmental Conservation Fund CO Country Office CPAP Country Programme Action Plan CPD Country Programme Document CSO Civil Society Organization DEO District Environmental Officer DFO District Forest Officer DLG District Local Government DRR/M Disaster Risk Reduction / Management DTPC District Technical Planning Committee ENRM Environment and Natural Resource Management FGD Focused Group Discussion GEF Global Environment Facility GMP General Management Plan GoU Government of Uganda ILNCCI Isingiro Lake Nakivale Community Conservation Initiative IP Implementing Partner IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature IWRM Integrated Water Resources Management JGI Jane Goodall Institute IWA International Water Association KACCODA Kachera Community Conservation and Development Association KAFRED Kibale Association for Rural and Environmental Development KAP Knowledge, Attitude and Practices KWR Katonga Wildlife Reserve LDCs Least Developed Countries LFA Logical Framework Analysis LOCCODA Lake Opeta Community Conservation Association M&E Monitoring and Evaluation METT Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool MoFPED Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development MoLG Ministry of Local Government MoTWA Ministry of Tourism, Wildlife and Antiquities MoWE Ministry of Water and Environment NDP National Development Plan NEMA National Environment Management Authority NGO Non-Government Organization NU Nature Uganda PA Protected Area PAC Programme Advisory Committee PES Payment for Ecosystem Services PIR Project Implementation Report ii Terminal Evaluation Report of the COBWEB Project- Nov. 2013 PUBO Pian-Upe-Bisina-Opeta PMU Project Management Unit ProDoc Project Document PSD Programme Support Document RTA Regional Technical Advisor SGP Small Grants Programme SWAMP Systematic Wetland Assessment and Management Project TE Terminal Evaluation TORs Terms of Reference TPR Tri-partite Review UCOTA Uganda Community Tourism Association UNDAF United Nations Development Assistance Framework UNDP United Nations Development Fund UNHCR United Nations High Commission for Refugees UNRA Uganda National Road Authority UTB Uganda Tourism Board UWA Uganda Wildlife Authority UWS Uganda Wildlife Society WAG Wetlands Advisory Group WASH Water, Health and Sanitation WCPA World Commission on Protected Areas WED World Environment Day WMD Wetland Management Department WSSP Wetland Sector Strategic Plan WWD World Wetlands Day iii Terminal Evaluation Report of the COBWEB Project- Nov. 2013 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...............................................................................................................................1 Project Description ....................................................................................................................................2 Co-Financing .............................................................................................................................................2 Achievements.............................................................................................................................................3 Evaluation Rating.......................................................................................................................................4 Summary of Conclusions, Recommendations and Lessons Learned ...........................................................6 1. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................................10 1.1 PURPOSE OF EVALUATION ..........................................................................................................10 1.2 SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY.....................................................................................................10 1.2.1 DESK REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS ...........................................................................................10 1.2.2 EVALUATION TOOLS AND APPROACHES..........................................................................11 1.2.3 DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS...................................................................................12 1.2.4 DELIVERABLES ..........................................................................................................................13 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT ............................................................14 2.1 PROJECT START AND DURATION ..............................................................................................14 2.2 PROBLEMS THAT PROJECT SOUGHT TO ADDRESS .................................................................14 2.3 IMMEDIATE DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE OF THE PROJECT......................................................15 2.4 MAIN STAKEHOLDERS...................................................................................................................16 2.5 BASELINE INDICATORS AND EXPECTED RESULTS...................................................................18 3. FINDINGS...............................................................................................................................................19 3.1 PROJECT DESIGN / FORMULATION ............................................................................................19 3.1.1. ANALYSIS OF LFA ...................................................................................................................19 3.1.2. ASSUMPTIONS AND RISKS ....................................................................................................19 3.1.3. LESSONS INCORPORATED FROM RELEVANT PROJECTS.................................................20 3.1.4 REPLICATION APPROACH .....................................................................................................21 3.1.5 UNDP COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE....................................................................................21 iv Terminal Evaluation Report of the COBWEB Project- Nov. 2013 3.1.6 LINKAGES BETWEEN PROJECT AND OTHER INTERVENTIONS WITHIN THE SECTOR ............................................................................................................................................................21 3.1.7 MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENT...........................................................................................22 3.2 PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION ........................................................................................................23 3.2.1 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT .....................................................................................................23 3.2.2 PROJECT FINANCE..................................................................................................................23 3.2.3. CO-FINANCING......................................................................................................................24 3.2.4 MONITORING AND EVALUATION DESIGN........................................................................24 3.2.5 PROJECT COORDINATION AND IMPLEMENTATION .......................................................25 3.3 PROJECT RESULTS ..........................................................................................................................26 3.3.1 OVERALL RESULTS...................................................................................................................26 3.3.2 RELEVANCE ..............................................................................................................................42 3.3.3 EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCY.........................................................................................43 3.3.4SUSTAINABILITY .......................................................................................................................44 3.3.5 COUNTRY OWNERSHIP.........................................................................................................48 3.3.6 MAINSTREAMING ....................................................................................................................48 3.3.7 IMPACT......................................................................................................................................49 4.0 CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND LESSONS LEARNT ...............................................51 4.1. PROJECT DESIGN...........................................................................................................................51
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wetlands of the Nile Basin the Many Eco for Their Liveli This Chapt Distribution, Functions and Contribution to Contribution Livelihoods They Provide
    important role particular imp into wetlands budget (Sutch 11 in the Blue N icantly 1110difi Wetlands of the Nile Basin the many eco for their liveli This chapt Distribution, functions and contribution to contribution livelihoods they provide. activities, ane rainfall (i.e. 1 Lisa-Maria Rebelo and Matthew P McCartney climate chan: food securit; currently eX' arc under tb Key messages water resour support • Wetlands occur extensively across the Nile Basin and support the livelihoods ofmillions of related ;;ervi people. Despite their importance, there are big gaps in the knowledge about the current better evalu: status of these ecosystems, and how populations in the Nile use them. A better understand­ systematic I ing is needed on the ecosystem services provided by the difl:erent types of wetlands in the provide. Nile, and how these contribute to local livelihoods. • While many ofthe Nile's wetlands arc inextricably linked to agricultural production systems the basis for making decisions on the extent to which, and how, wetlands can be sustainably used for agriculture is weak. The Nile I: • Due to these infi)fl11atio!1 gaps, the future contribution of wetlands to agriculture is poorly the basin ( understood, and wetlands are otten overlooked in the Nile Basin discourse on water and both the E agriculture. While there is great potential for the further development of agriculture and marsh, fen, fisheries, in particular in the wetlands of Sudan and Ethiopia, at the same time many that is stat wetlands in the basin are threatened by poor management practices and populations. which at \, In order to ensure that the future use of wetlands for agriculture will result in net benefits (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Opeta Wetland System Ramsar Information Sheet
    Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7, as amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the Conference of the Contracting Parties. Note for compilers: 1. The RIS should be completed in accordance with the attached Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for completing the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands. Compilers are strongly advised to read this guidance before filling in the RIS. 2. Once completed, the RIS (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Ramsar Bureau. Compilers are strongly urged to provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the RIS and, where possible, digital copies of maps. LAKE OPETA WETLAND SYSTEM RAMSAR INFORMATION SHEET 1. Name and address of the RIS Compiler: Achilles Byaruhanga and Stephen Kigoolo NatureUganda Plot 83, Tufnel Drive, Kamwokya P. O Box 27034, Kampala - Uganda. Tel: 256 41 540719 Fax no: 256 41 533 528 E-mail: [email protected] 2. Date: 17 September 2005. 3. Country: The Republic of Uganda 4. Name of the Ramsar site: Lake Opeta Wetland System 5. Map of the Ramsar site: Hard copy: attached Digital (electronic) format: yes 6. Geographical coordinates: 34004" - 34024" E and 01033" - 01051" N,. 7. General Location: Lake Opeta and its surrounding swamps is located in north eastern Uganda, in four districts of Nakapiripirit (Namalu sub-county and Lorachat sub-county), Sironko (Bunambutye sub- county), Katakwi (Usuku county, Magoro sub-county) and Kumi (Kolir sub-county, Malera sub-county and Ongino sub-county). It is located 25 kms from Kumi town and the northern part borders a Wildlife Reserve, Pian-Upe Wildlife Reserve and Teso Community Reserve.
    [Show full text]
  • Population, Distribution and Conservation Status of Sitatunga (Tragelaphus Spekei) (Sclater) in Selected Wetlands in Uganda
    POPULATION, DISTRIBUTION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF SITATUNGA (TRAGELAPHUS SPEKEI) (SCLATER) IN SELECTED WETLANDS IN UGANDA Biological -Life history Biological -Ecologicl… Protection -Regulation of… 5 Biological -Dispersal Protection -Effectiveness… 4 Biological -Human tolerance Protection -proportion… 3 Status -National Distribtuion Incentive - habitat… 2 Status -National Abundance Incentive - species… 1 Status -National… Incentive - Effect of harvest 0 Status -National… Monitoring - confidence in… Status -National Major… Monitoring - methods used… Harvest Management -… Control -Confidence in… Harvest Management -… Control - Open access… Harvest Management -… Control of Harvest-in… Harvest Management -Aim… Control of Harvest-in… Harvest Management -… Control of Harvest-in… Tragelaphus spekii (sitatunga) NonSubmitted Detrimental to Findings (NDF) Research and Monitoring Unit Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA) Plot 7 Kira Road Kamwokya, P.O. Box 3530 Kampala Uganda Email/Web - [email protected]/ www.ugandawildlife.org Prepared By Dr. Edward Andama (PhD) Lead consultant Busitema University, P. O. Box 236, Tororo Uganda Telephone: 0772464279 or 0704281806 E-mail: [email protected] [email protected], [email protected] Final Report i January 2019 Contents ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND GLOSSARY .......................................................... vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... viii 1.1Background ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Two Rwandese Nationals Sentenced to 12 Years in Jail for Poaching | Chimpreports
    5.7.2021 Two Rwandese Nationals Sentenced to 12 Years in Jail for Poaching | ChimpReports News Two Rwandese Nationals Sentenced to 12 Years in Jail for Poaching Arafat Nzito • July 4, 2021 1 minute read Two Rwandese nationals identified as Habimana Sabanitah and Sobomana Augustine have been sentenced to 12 years in jail for illegal entry and killing of protected wildlife species. The two, both residents of Rwamwanja refugee settlement in Kamwenge district, were found in possession of a dead bush buck inside Katonga Wildlife Reserve. LUISA CERANO - Long-Cardigan aus Mohair-Mix - 34 - braun - Damen Luisa Cerano | Sponsored By using this website, you agree that we and our partners may set cookies for purposes such as customisingRead Next Scontenttory and advertising.TranslateI Understand » https://chimpreports.com/two-rwandese-nationals-sentenced-to-12-years-in-jail-for-poaching/ 1/7 5.7.2021 Two Rwandese Nationals Sentenced to 12 Years in Jail for Poaching | ChimpReports According to the Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA), the two were arrested on June 28, 2021 by UWA personnel inside Katonga Wildlife Reserve. “They were found in possession of a dead bush buck, 2 pangas, 2 sharp spears and 8 wire snares that were used to kill the animal,” UWA stated. Upon arrest, the suspects were transferred to Kyegegwa police station and later produced before the Chief Magistrate’s Court of Kyenjojo to take plea. The accused pleaded guilty to the counts as charged of illegal entry and killing a protected wildlife species. Prosecution led by Latif Amis argued that the two deprived the wider public and national economy the benefits of conservation including tourism, employment and foreign exchange earnings.
    [Show full text]
  • Important Bird Areas in Uganda. Status and Trends 2008
    IMPORTANT BIRD AREAS IN UGANDA Status and Trends 2008 NatureUganda The East Africa Natural History Society Important Bird Areas in Uganda Status and Trends 2008 Compiled by: Michael Opige Odull and Achilles Byaruhanga Edited by: Ambrose R. B Mugisha and Julius Arinaitwe Map illustrations by: David Mushabe Graphic designs by: Some Graphics Ltd January 2009 Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non commercial purposes is authorized without further written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Production of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written notice of the copyright holder. Citation: NatureUganda (2009). Important Bird Areas in Uganda, Status and Trends 2008. Copyright © NatureUganda – The East Africa Natural History Society About NatureUganda NatureUganda is a Non Governmental Organization working towards the conservation of species, sites and habitats not only for birds but other taxa too. It is the BirdLife partner in Uganda and a member of IUCN. The organization is involved in various research, conservation and advocacy work in many sites across the country. These three pillars are achieved through conservation projects, environmental education programmes and community involvement in conservation among others. All is aimed at promoting the understanding, appreciation and conservation of nature. For more information please contact: NatureUganda The East Africa Natural History Society Plot 83 Tufnell Drive, Kamwokya. P.O.Box 27034, Kampala Uganda Email [email protected] Website: www.natureuganda.org DISCLAIMER This status report has been produced with financial assistance of the European Union (EuropeAid/ ENV/2007/132-278. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of Birdlife International and can under no normal circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal for Uganda
    AFB.PPRC.27-28.2 AFB/PPRC.26-27/2 21 June 2021 Adaptation Fund Board Project and Programme Review Committee PROPOSAL FOR UGANDA AFB/PPRC.27-28/2 Background 1. The Operational Policies and Guidelines (OPG) for Parties to Access Resources from the Adaptation Fund (the Fund), adopted by the Adaptation Fund Board (the Board), state in paragraph 45 that regular adaptation project and programme proposals, i.e. those that request funding exceeding US$ 1 million, would undergo either a one-step, or a two-step approval process. In case of the one-step process, the proponent would directly submit a fully-developed project proposal. In the two-step process, the proponent would first submit a brief project concept, which would be reviewed by the Project and Programme Review Committee (PPRC) and would have to receive the endorsement of the Board. In the second step, the fully-developed project/programme document would be reviewed by the PPRC, and would ultimately require the Board’s approval. 2. The Templates approved by the Board (Annex 5 of the OPG, as amended in March 2016) do not include a separate template for project and programme concepts but provide that these are to be submitted using the project and programme proposal template. The section on Adaptation Fund Project Review Criteria states: For regular projects using the two-step approval process, only the first four criteria will be applied when reviewing the 1st step for regular project concept. In addition, the information provided in the 1st step approval process with respect to the review criteria for the regular project concept could be less detailed than the information in the request for approval template submitted at the 2nd step approval process.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Tanzania Pas Proposal To
    PROJECT DOCUMENT Republic of Uganda United Nations Development Programme Global Environment Facility Conservation and Sustainable Use of the Threatened Savanna Woodland in the Kidepo Critical Landscape in North Eastern Uganda GEFSEC PROJECT ID: 4456; GEF AGENCY ID: PIMS 4592; AWARD ID: 00072558; PROJECT ID: 00085611 1 Brief Description: The Government of Uganda has made significant investments in most protected areas (PAs) in the country. However, the Kidepo Critical Landscape of North Eastern Uganda, encompassing eight protected areas under a range of management authorities received limited investment over the past 20 years due to protracted conflict, and proportionately suffer from lower management effectiveness compared to other sites. The long-term solution proposed by this project is to strengthen the national system of protected areas in Uganda by improving the management effectiveness of protected areas in the Kidepo Critical landscape in the North Eastern part of the country, thus affording biodiversity sufficient protection from emerging and future threats. This can be achieved through providing planned, targeted and effective support to the operational capacity of core PAs within the landscape and through creating a coordinated landscape management approach in the KCL to serve as a shield against human-induced pressures on Uganda’s threatened biodiversity. This proposed project in the Kidepo Critical Landscape of PAs and buffer zones in northern Uganda satisfies the requirements for GEF financing under GEF Biodiversity Focal Area, Strategic Objective one: Improve sustainability of Protected Area systems. The project will directly bring 416,485 ha of land under strengthened PA management arrangements designed to conserve biodiversity, involving three different forms of PA Status (NP, CFR and CWA) as well as public lands, with a wider positive influence on an additional 239,215 ha of dispersal areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Baseline Surveys of Lake Bisina, Lake Opeta, Lake Mburo and Nakivali Wetlands Systems a ECOLOGICAL BASELINE SURVEYS OF: LAKE BISINA-OPETA WETLANDS
    Ecological baseline surveys of Lake Bisina, Lake Opeta, Lake Mburo and Nakivali wetlands systems Item Type monograph Authors Odull, Michael Opige; Byaruhanga, Achilles Publisher The East Africa Natural History Society Download date 01/10/2021 22:51:37 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/32868 ECOLOGICAL BASELINE SURVEYS OF: LAKE BISINA - OPETA WETLANDS SYSTEM LAKE MBURO - NAKIVALI WETLANDS SYSTEM 2009 Photo: Women fishing on Lake Bisina Photo: Women Ecological Baseline Surveys of Lake Bisina, Lake Opeta, Lake Mburo and Nakivali Wetlands Systems A B Ecological Baseline Surveys of Lake Bisina, Lake Opeta, Lake Mburo and Nakivali Wetlands Systems ECOLOGICAL BASELINE SURVEYS OF: LAKE BISINA - OPETA WETLANDS SYSTEM LAKE MBURO - NAKIVALI WETLANDS SYSTEM © 2009 NatureUganda The East Africa Natural History Society Plot 83 Tufnel Drive, Kamwokya - Kampala. P. O. Box 27034, Kampala - Uganda. Compiled by: Michael Opige Odull and Achilles Byaruhanga Cover photo: By. Achilles Byaruhanga ‘Women fishing in Lake Bisina’ Contribution from: Dianah Nalwanga - Wabwire, Lydia Tushabe (NatureUganda), Deo Muhumuza (Bird Uganda Safaris), Richard Ssemanda, Perpetra Akite, Andrew Olanya (Makerere University, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology) Olivia Maganyi, Ireene Mwolobi (Makerere University, Faculty of Science; Botany Department - Harbarium) Dr. Aventino Kasangaki (Institute of Tropical Forest Conservation, Mbarara University of Science and Technology) Dr Robert Kityo (Makerere University, Faculty of Science; Department of Zoology.) Dr. Dismas Mbabazi,
    [Show full text]
  • The Blue Swallow
    Saving the major non-breeding populations of Blue swallows and their habitats in Uganda. Project report: with funding from to the BP Conservation Programme By Achilles Byaruhanga1 and Dianah Nalwanga 1) NatureUganda, P. O. Box 27034, Kampala, Uganda Tel. +256 041 540719, Fax: +256 041 533528, e-mail., [email protected], [email protected] 2) Dianah Nalwanga P. O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda. Date: February 2006 Acknowledgements We are indebted to BP Conservation Programme who kindly provided funding for this follow work on the Blue Swallow. This award followed a successful implementation of the first award that established the major wintering areas of Blue Swallow in Uganda. We thank the local governments in Wakiso, Masaka and Rakai districts for their support and Wetlands Inspection Division for the support in highlighting Blue swallow sites as critical wetlands. A proposal to gazette the sites as Ramsar sites has been made. NatureUganda availed the facilities for use by the team such as transport, other equipment and volunteers. Our collegues for the hard work and committment and all other people and institutions who made the project a great success. 2 Table of contents Project Blue Swallow. .......................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary/ Abstract ............................................................................................................. 4 Project description ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 12 Day Primates & Predators
    Uganda is a unique destination offering a wonderful mix of savannah and forest parks. Gorilla and chimp tracking are highlights, but many smaller primates can be seen as well. Uganda also offers great savannah safaris, but not all of the Big Five are present. Black rhino is extinct, and the status of the white rhino was the same until they were reintroduced in Ziwa Rhino Sanctuary in 2005. Cheetah is very rarely seen. Lion is quite common in Queen Elizabeth and Murchison Falls national parks. They can often be found hunting Uganda kob, which gives them away with their alarm calls. Giraffe can only be found in Murchison Falls, Lake Mburo and Kidepo Valley national parks, while zebra exists only in Kidepo and Lake Mburo national parks and Katonga wildlife reserve. Uganda is also a prime birding destination. You will see most of these species at some point in this wonderful full coverage itinerary throughout Uganda 12 Day Primates & Predators ITINERARY UGANDA Day 1: Monday 15 July 2019 Today, you will be collected from Entebbe Airport and transferred to Hotel No 5 for one night. Approximate driving time: 30 mins Accommodation at No.5 Boutique Hotel Ltd in a Luxury Double Room on a bed and breakfast basis for 1 night. In : Monday 15-Jul-2019 Out : Tuesday 16-Jul-2019 Nestled in the leafy suburbs of Entebbe, Hotel No.5 is a stylish boutique hotel. From the moment you arrive, you are warmly welcomed and cared for. With just ten luxury rooms and five apartments, many opening onto the garden and swimming pool, this is a great option for guests looking for an intimate stay in a tranquil setting.
    [Show full text]
  • District Multi-Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability Profile for Kamwenge District
    District Multi-hazard, Risk and Vulnerability Profile for Kamwenge District District Multi-hazard, Risk and Vulnerability Profile a b District Multi-hazard, Risk and Vulnerability Profile Acknowledgement On behalf of office of the Prime Minister, I wish to express sincere appreciation to all of the key stakeholders who provided their valuable inputs and support to this hazard, risk and vulnerability mapping exercise that led to the production of comprehensive district hazard, risk and vulnerability profiles for the South Western districts which are Isingiro, Kamwenge, Mbarara, Rubirizi and Sheema. I especially extend my sincere thanks to the Department of Disaster Preparedness and Management in Office of the Prime Minister, under the leadership of Mr. Martin Owor - Commissioner Relief, Disaster Preparedness and Management and Mr. Gerald Menhya - Assistant Commissioner Disaster Preparedness for the oversight and management of the entire exercise. The HRV team was led by Ms. Ahimbisibwe Catherine - Senior Disaster Preparedness Officer, Nyangoma Immaculate - Disaster Preparedness Officer and the team of consultants (GIS/DRR Specialists): Mr. Nsiimire Peter and Mr. Nyarwaya Amos who gathered the information and compiled this document are applauded. Our gratitude goes to the UNDP for providing funds to support the Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability Mapping. The team comprised of Mr. Gilbert Anguyo, Disaster Risk Reduction Analyst, Mr. Janini Gerald and Mr. Ongom Alfred for providing valuable technical support in the organization of the exercise. My appreciation also goes to the District Teams: 1. Isingiro District: Mr. Bwengye Emmanuel – Ag. District Natural Resources Officer, Mr. Kamoga Abdu - Environment Officer and Mr. Mukalazi Dickson - District Physical Planner. 2. Kamwenge District: Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Days Uganda Gorilla Trekking Experience
    5 Days Uganda Gorilla Trekking Experience Safari Itinerary Day One: Kampala – Lake Mburo National Park Meet and greet will be at 0600hrs at your hotel before departing Kampala. Drive west with a brief stop at the Equator for some ‘was at the Equator’ memorable photo moments. Your drive continues to Lake Mburo National Park. Arrive is in time for lunch at your lodge and a short rest. Enjoy the afternoon boat ride on Lake Mburo. This is the most popular activity in Lake Mburo National Park. The boat ride provides great opportunity to observe mighty hippo and crocodile populations. Water bird species are often too numerous for the keenest birder to identify all. Lake Mburo National Park supports over 350 bird species including rare but regularly seen species like African fin foot and white-backed heron. The rarely seen Papyrus Gonolek may come to the edge of the papyrus if called using a recorded bird call. Other species in Lake Mburo include African fish eagles, Narina Trogon, Ross’s Turaco, African green- pigeon and the Bare-Faced Go-Away-bird among others. You will have a great experience coupled with stunning scenery and panoramic landscape views that will impress upon you true African beauty. Later take a sundown game-drive to end your day in an adventurous style. You will be searching for zebra, impala, eland, buffalo, oribi, Defassa waterbuck, leopard, hippo, hyena, topi and reedbuck. You will drive back for dinner and overnight at your preferred accommodation. (Transit Time: 5hrs.) Day Two: Lake Mburo - Bwindi Impenetrable National Park Wake up to the rhythm of nature.
    [Show full text]