DOCSLIB.ORG

Cold Pools and MCS Propagation: Forecasting the Motion of Downwind-Developing Mcss

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cold Pools and MCS Propagation: Forecasting the Motion of Downwind-Developing Mcss VOLUME 18 WEATHER AND FORECASTING DECEMBER 2003 Cold Pools and MCS Propagation: Forecasting the Motion of Downwind-Developing MCSs STEPHEN F. C ORFIDI NOAA/NWS/NCEP/Storm Prediction Center, Norman, Oklahoma (Manuscript received 13 March 2003, in ®nal form 20 May 2003) ABSTRACT The primary factors that affect the direction of propagation and overall movement of surface-based mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) are discussed. It is shown that although propagation is indeed related to the strength and direction of the low-level jet as previous studies have shown, it is more speci®cally dependent upon the degree of cold-pool-relative ¯ow and to the distribution of conditional instability present along a system's gust front. An updated technique that may be used to forecast the short-term (3±6 h) motion of MCS centroids based on these concepts is introduced. The procedure builds on the long-established observation that MCS motion is a function of 1) the advection of existing cells by the mean wind and 2) the propagation of new convection relative to existing storms. Observed wind and thermodynamic data, in conjunction with anticipated cold-pool motion and orientation, are used to assess the speed and direction of cell propagation, that is, whether propagation will be upwind, downwind, or some combination of the two. The technique ultimately yields an estimate of overall system movement and has application regardless of scale, season, or synoptic regime. 1. Introduction 1980). They were among the ®rst to recognize that though no true ``steering level'' exists for MCC motion, Thunderstorms are frequently organized in lines or such systems typically move approximately parallel to clusters known as mesoscale convective systems the contours of the 1000±500-hPa thickness. They also (MCSs). The term MCS is generally reserved for en- noted that although most convective systems move sembles of storms that satisfy certain spatial or temporal criteria (see, e.g., Houze 1993, p. 334; Parker and John- downshear along the contours, others inexplicably move son 2000). In a less restrictive sense, however, any me- upshear. The speed of MCC motion was found to be soalpha- or mesobeta-scale (Orlanski 1975) area of modulated by the location of maximum low-level mois- moist convection might be considered an MCS (Ray ture convergence relative to existing convection. 1990). Newton and Katz (1958) and Chappell (1986), among Because MCSs produce a disproportionate share of others, showed that the motion of a convective system signi®cant convective weather (high winds, ¯ash ¯ood- can be thought of as being the vector sum of 1) an ing, etc.) and because their evolution is often not pre- advective component approximated by the direction and dicted well by operational numerical guidance, fore- magnitude of the mean cloud-layer wind and 2) a prop- casting MCS motion is of considerable importance to agation component governed by the rate and location operational meteorologists. Forecasts of MCS motion of new cell formation relative to existing convection. are dependent upon anticipation of the predominant Building on this idea, and extending the work of Merritt propagational mode or modes likely during an event. In and Fritsch, Cor®di et al. (1996) showed that the prop- particular, it is important to distinguish between MCS agation component is, in many cases, directly propor- environments conducive to upwind propagation and tional but opposite in direction to the low-level jet. This those that exhibit downwind storm development and ®nding is somewhat surprising given that MCS prop- sometimes evolve into derecho-producing squall lines. agation can be in¯uenced by a myriad of factors such Attempts to forecast MCS movement have met with as the distribution of convective available potential en- mixed results. Merritt and Fritsch (1984) examined the ergy (CAPE), convective inhibition, gravity waves, out- motion of more than 100 MCSs, most of which were ¯ow boundaries, and orographic effects. mesoscale convective complexes (MCCs; Maddox This paper discusses MCS motion, with emphasis on those factors related to a system's cold pool that most in¯uence cell propagation and, ultimately, overall sys- Corresponding author address: Stephen F. Cor®di, Storm Predic- tion Center, 1313 Halley Circle, Norman, OK 73069. tem movement. Based on this presentation, a vector- E-mail: stephen.cor®[email protected] based forecast technique is developed for predicting the 997 998 WEATHER AND FORECASTING VOLUME 18 vection and propagation, can affect MCS movement. Therefore, motion estimates must be updated frequently when the wind ®eld exhibits signi®cant spatial or tem- poral variability. Second, there is no accounting for the in¯uence of terrain on convective development and low- level ¯ow. As a result, the concept is more dif®cult to FIG. 1. Schematic of the original vector technique, with MCS core apply in cases of orographically forced convection (e.g., motion (thick dotted arrow) expressed as the vector sum of 1) ad- vection of cells by the mean cloud-layer wind (arrow pointing to Pontrelli et al. 1999). upper right) and 2) cell propagation directed into the low-level jet A more serious shortcoming of the original vector (arrow pointing to bottom of page). MCS centroid is depicted by the approach follows from its assumption that new cell de- cross symbol (after Cor®di et al. 1996). velopment and, therefore, system propagation always occur in the direction opposite that of the low-level jet, motion of MCSs characterized by downwind propaga- or, more generally, the low-level ¯ow. To be sure, many tion. warm-season MCSs over the central United States in- deed do exhibit propagation in that direction (see, e.g., Moore et al. 1993; and Junker et al. 1999) at a rate 2. Background approximated by the speed of the jet.2 It is clear, how- a. The original vector technique ever, that this is not always the case. For example, de- recho-producing squall lines often move at a substantial Cor®di et al. (1996) developed a simple technique to angle to the low-level ¯ow, especially during their ini- predict the short-term (3±6 h) motion of the mesobeta- tiation (Johns et al. 1990). Radar data reveal that, al- scale cores or ``centroids'' of MCSs using the low-level though propagation is largely responsible for the ob- jet to estimate the direction and rate of storm propa- served motion of these systems, new cell development gation. Forecast centroid motion is taken to be the sum is not necessarily directed into the low-level ¯ow but of 1) a vector that represents cell advection by the mean rather occurs on the leading (downwind) edge of the cloud-layer wind (with ``cloud layer'' taken to be the system cold pool. For this reason, to be more universally 850±300-hPa layer)1 and 2) a vector that represents applicable, the vector concept must be modi®ed to ac- storm propagation, that is, new cell development, equal count for the presence of cold pools and the potential in magnitude but directed opposite to the low-level jet for propagation away from the low-level ¯ow. (Fig. 1). In practice, the 850-hPa wind is used to ap- proximate the low-level jet, although it is recognized that this approach may not identify the true jet in all b. Cold-pool and gust-front motion cases. In the absence of a distinct low-level speed max- One of the more distinctive features of a well-orga- imum in the vertical direction, the strongest wind in the nized MCS is the cold pool that develops at lower levels lowest 5000 ft (1.5 km) is generally used, in accordance beneath or just behind the strongest convection. Cold with Bonner (1968). pools represent the collective out¯ow of individual con- The vector technique is applicable in any kind of vective cells and the negative buoyancy of parcels with- environmental wind regime and requires knowledge of in or beneath the convection. Sublimation and/or melt- only the 850-hPa and mean cloud-layer winds. The pro- ing and evaporation of precipitation falling through un- cedure is especially useful in identifying those kinematic saturated air, precipitation drag, and vertical perturba- situations conducive to the development of quasi-sta- tion pressure gradients are all factors that may enhance tionary and ``back building'' MCSs (Bluestein and Jain downdraft development and cold-pool strength. 1985). Quasi-stationary systems arise when the wind The periphery of a cold pool, that is, the gust front pro®le is unidirectional and cell advection is exactly or out¯ow boundary, is marked by low-level conver- offset by cell propagation. Back building occurs under gence and ascent (Purdom 1973; Charba 1974; Goff similar conditions but when propagation exceeds ad- 1976). As a result, gust fronts are often the site of new vection, resulting in overall upwind motion. Identi®- cell development. Such activity typically is not distrib- cation of such events is important because they fre- uted evenly along such boundaries. Instead, storm ini- quently are associated with excessive rainfall (Chappell tiation tends to occur in discrete zones, within which 1986). kinematic and/or thermodynamic factors are most fa- The original vector concept, while useful, is never- vorable for development. Observation suggests that new theless subject to several limitations. First, the scheme cell development occurs most readily where the ambient, does not account for spatial and temporal changes in the environmental wind that, in altering both cell ad- 2 The original dataset used by Cor®di et al. (1996) was composed primarily of nocturnal MCCs that were associated with well-de®ned 1 The speed and direction of the mean cloud-layer wind are cal- low-level jets east of the Rockies.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Weather Charts Natural History Museum of Utah – Nature Unleashed Stefan Brems
    Weather Charts Natural History Museum of Utah – Nature Unleashed Stefan Brems Across the world, many different charts of different formats are used by different governments. These charts can be anything from a simple prognostic chart, used to convey weather forecasts in a simple to read visual manner to the much more complex Wind and Temperature charts used by meteorologists and pilots to determine current and forecast weather conditions at high altitudes. When used properly these charts can be the key to accurately determining the weather conditions in the near future. This Write-Up will provide a brief introduction to several common types of charts. Prognostic Charts To the untrained eye, this chart looks like a strange piece of modern art that an angry mathematician scribbled numbers on. However, this chart is an extremely important resource when evaluating the movement of weather fronts and pressure areas. Fronts Depicted on the chart are weather front combined into four categories; Warm Fronts, Cold Fronts, Stationary Fronts and Occluded Fronts. Warm fronts are depicted by red line with red semi-circles covering one edge. The front movement is indicated by the direction the semi- circles are pointing. The front follows the Semi-Circles. Since the example above has the semi-circles on the top, the front would be indicated as moving up. Cold fronts are depicted as a blue line with blue triangles along one side. Like warm fronts, the direction in which the blue triangles are pointing dictates the direction of the cold front. Stationary fronts are frontal systems which have stalled and are no longer moving.
    [Show full text]
  • NWS Unified Surface Analysis Manual
    Unified Surface Analysis Manual Weather Prediction Center Ocean Prediction Center National Hurricane Center Honolulu Forecast Office November 21, 2013 Table of Contents Chapter 1: Surface Analysis – Its History at the Analysis Centers…………….3 Chapter 2: Datasets available for creation of the Unified Analysis………...…..5 Chapter 3: The Unified Surface Analysis and related features.……….……….19 Chapter 4: Creation/Merging of the Unified Surface Analysis………….……..24 Chapter 5: Bibliography………………………………………………….…….30 Appendix A: Unified Graphics Legend showing Ocean Center symbols.….…33 2 Chapter 1: Surface Analysis – Its History at the Analysis Centers 1. INTRODUCTION Since 1942, surface analyses produced by several different offices within the U.S. Weather Bureau (USWB) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA’s) National Weather Service (NWS) were generally based on the Norwegian Cyclone Model (Bjerknes 1919) over land, and in recent decades, the Shapiro-Keyser Model over the mid-latitudes of the ocean. The graphic below shows a typical evolution according to both models of cyclone development. Conceptual models of cyclone evolution showing lower-tropospheric (e.g., 850-hPa) geopotential height and fronts (top), and lower-tropospheric potential temperature (bottom). (a) Norwegian cyclone model: (I) incipient frontal cyclone, (II) and (III) narrowing warm sector, (IV) occlusion; (b) Shapiro–Keyser cyclone model: (I) incipient frontal cyclone, (II) frontal fracture, (III) frontal T-bone and bent-back front, (IV) frontal T-bone and warm seclusion. Panel (b) is adapted from Shapiro and Keyser (1990) , their FIG. 10.27 ) to enhance the zonal elongation of the cyclone and fronts and to reflect the continued existence of the frontal T-bone in stage IV.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2013
    Oklahoma Monthly Climate Summary DECEMBER 2013 A frigid and sometimes icy December seemed a fitting way to 1.53 inches, about a half-inch below normal, to rank as the close out the boisterous weather of 2013. Preliminary data from 59th wettest December on record. That total is possibly an the Oklahoma Mesonet ranked the month as the 17th coolest underestimate due to the frozen precipitation, although the December on record at nearly 4 degrees below normal. Records moisture pattern across various parts of the state was quite of this type for Oklahoma date back to 1895. The statewide clear. Far southeastern Oklahoma received from 3-5 inches average temperature as recorded by the Mesonet was 35.2 during the month while western areas of the state received degrees. As chilly as it seemed, however, that mark provided less than a half-inch, in general. little threat to 1983’s record cold of 25.8 degrees, but also far cooler than 2012’s 42.1 degrees. There were two significant The cold December propelled 2013’s statewide average winter storms during December, each creating headaches for annual temperature to a mark of 58.9 degrees, 0.8 degrees travelers and power utility companies. The first storm struck on below normal and the 27th coolest calendar year on record for December 5-6 in two separate waves and brought freezing rain, the state. That mark stands in stark contrast to 2012’s record sleet and snow across the state. Significant snow totals of 5-6 warm year of 63.1 degrees.
    [Show full text]
  • ESSENTIALS of METEOROLOGY (7Th Ed.) GLOSSARY
    ESSENTIALS OF METEOROLOGY (7th ed.) GLOSSARY Chapter 1 Aerosols Tiny suspended solid particles (dust, smoke, etc.) or liquid droplets that enter the atmosphere from either natural or human (anthropogenic) sources, such as the burning of fossil fuels. Sulfur-containing fossil fuels, such as coal, produce sulfate aerosols. Air density The ratio of the mass of a substance to the volume occupied by it. Air density is usually expressed as g/cm3 or kg/m3. Also See Density. Air pressure The pressure exerted by the mass of air above a given point, usually expressed in millibars (mb), inches of (atmospheric mercury (Hg) or in hectopascals (hPa). pressure) Atmosphere The envelope of gases that surround a planet and are held to it by the planet's gravitational attraction. The earth's atmosphere is mainly nitrogen and oxygen. Carbon dioxide (CO2) A colorless, odorless gas whose concentration is about 0.039 percent (390 ppm) in a volume of air near sea level. It is a selective absorber of infrared radiation and, consequently, it is important in the earth's atmospheric greenhouse effect. Solid CO2 is called dry ice. Climate The accumulation of daily and seasonal weather events over a long period of time. Front The transition zone between two distinct air masses. Hurricane A tropical cyclone having winds in excess of 64 knots (74 mi/hr). Ionosphere An electrified region of the upper atmosphere where fairly large concentrations of ions and free electrons exist. Lapse rate The rate at which an atmospheric variable (usually temperature) decreases with height. (See Environmental lapse rate.) Mesosphere The atmospheric layer between the stratosphere and the thermosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Station Model (U.S.)
    Surface Station Model (U.S.) Notes: Pressure Leading 10 or 9 is not plotted for surface pressure Greater than 500 = 950 to 999 mb Less than 500 = 1000 to 1050 mb 988 Æ 998.8 mb 200 Æ 1020.0 mb Sky Cover, Weather Symbols on a Surface Station Model Wind Speed How to read: Half barb = 5 knots Full barb = 10 knots Flag = 50 knots 1 knot = 1 nautical mile per hour = 1.15 mph = 65 knots The direction of the Wind direction barb reflects which way the wind is coming from NORTHERLY From the north 360° 270° 90° 180° WESTERLY EASTERLY From the west From the east SOUTHERLY From the south Four types of fronts COLD FRONT: Cold air overtakes warm air. B to C WARM FRONT: Warm air overtakes cold air. C to D OCCLUDED FRONT: Cold air catches up to the warm front. C to Low pressure center STATIONARY FRONT: No movement of air masses. A to B Fronts and Extratropical Cyclones Feb. 24, 2007 Case In mid-latitudes, fronts are part of the structure of extratropical cyclones. Extratropical cyclones form because of the horizontal temperature gradient and are part of the general circulation—helping to transport energy from equator to pole. Type of weather and air masses in relation to fronts: Feb. 24, 2007 case mPmP cPcP mTmT Characteristics of a front 1. Sharp temperature changes over a short distance 2. Changes in moisture content 3. Wind shifts 4. A lowering of surface pressure, or pressure trough 5. Clouds and precipitation We’ll see how these characteristics manifest themselves for fronts in North America using the example from Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • You Are a Meterologist!
    YOU ARE A METEROLOGIST! ★A meteorologist is a scientist who studies the atmosphere to forecast weather in a given area. ASSIGNMENT: You have been hired by the Weather Channel as a meteorologist to forecast weather in the United States. Since the Weather Channel provides forecasts for all over the country, your first assignment with them is to forecast four different areas of the United States using your knowledge about air masses and fronts. TASK: 1.) Examine the map of the United States and locate the four cities named on your data table. (Use an atlas to help you find these places.) 2.) After locating the cities, identify and describe the fronts heading towards each city and the air mass that follows it. (Use your reference sheet to help recall types of air mass: continental polar, continental tropical, maritime polar, or maritime tropical.) Record this information in the data table. 3.) For each city, predict how the incoming front will change the weather (temperature, air pressure, storms in that area.) Record your thinking in the data table. 4.) Select one city and write a paragraph about the anticipated weather for that area. Be sure to include data from the table to explain your thinking and forecast. DATA TABLE-FORECASTING WEATHER IN THE UNITED STATES INCOMING INCOMING CITY, STATE FRONT AIR MASS EXPLAIN HOW THIS FRONT MIGHT CHANGE THE IN THE UNITED (Warm Front How do you know? WEATHER AT THIS AREA? STATES or Cold Front) (What’s your evidence from the map?) TEMPERATURE POSSIBLE WEATHER St. Louis, Missouri El Paso, Texas Atlanta, Georgia Minneapolis Minnesota ★MAKE AN INFERENCE: Locate Boston, Massachusetts.
    [Show full text]
  • Warm-Core Formation in Tropical Storm Humberto (2001)
    APRIL 2012 D O L L I N G A N D B A R N E S 1177 Warm-Core Formation in Tropical Storm Humberto (2001) KLAUS DOLLING AND GARY M. BARNES University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii (Manuscript received 27 July 2011, in final form 18 October 2011) ABSTRACT At 0600 UTC 22 September 2001, Humberto was a tropical depression with a minimum central pressure of 1010 hPa. Twelve hours later, when the first global positioning system dropwindsondes (GPS sondes) were jettisoned, Humberto’s minimum central pressure was 1000 hPa and it had attained tropical storm strength. Thirty GPS sondes, radar from the WP-3D, and in situ aircraft measurements are utilized to observe ther- modynamic structures in Humberto and their relationship to stratiform and convective elements during the early stage of the formation of an eye. The analysis of Tropical Storm Humberto offers a new view of the pre-wind-induced surface heat exchange (pre-WISHE) stage of tropical cyclone evolution. Humberto contained a mesoscale convective vortex (MCV) similar to observations of other developing tropical systems. The MCV advects the exhaust from deep con- vection in the form of an anvil cyclonically over the low-level circulation center. On the trailing edge of the anvil an area of mesoscale descent induces dry adiabatic warming in the lower troposphere. The nascent warm core at low levels causes the initial drop in pressure at the surface and acts to cap the boundary layer (BL). As BL air flows into the nascent eye, the energy content increases until the energy is released from under the cap on the down shear side of the warm core in the form of vigorous cumulonimbi, which become the nascent eyewall.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesoscale Convective Complexes: an Overview by Harold Reynolds a Report Submitted in Conformity with the Requirements for the De
    Mesoscale Convective Complexes: An Overview By Harold Reynolds A report submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the University of Toronto © Harold Reynolds 1990 Table of Contents 1. What is a Mesoscale Convective Complex?........................................................................................ 3 2. Why Study Mesoscale Convective Complexes?..................................................................................3 3. The Internal Structure and Life Cycle of an MCC...............................................................................4 3.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................................... 4 3.2 Genesis........................................................................................................................................... 5 3.3 Growth............................................................................................................................................6 3.4 Maturity and Decay........................................................................................................................ 7 3.5 Heat and Moisture Budgets............................................................................................................ 8 4. Precipitation......................................................................................................................................... 8 5. Mesoscale Warm-Core Vortices.......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Mesoscale Processes and Severe Convective Weather
    CHAPTER 3 JOHNSON AND MAPES Chapter 3 Mesoscale Processes and Severe Convective Weather RICHARD H. JOHNSON Department of Atmospheric Science. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado BRIAN E. MAPES CIRESICDC, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado REVIEW PANEL: David B. Parsons (Chair), K. Emanuel, J. M. Fritsch, M. Weisman, D.-L. Zhang 3.1. Introduction tion, mesoscale phenomena occur on horizontal scales between ten and several hundred kilometers. This Severe convective weather events-tornadoes, hail­ range generally encompasses motions for which both storms, high winds, flash floods-are inherently mesoscale ageostrophic advections and Coriolis effects are im­ phenomena. While the large-scale flow establishes envi­ portant (Emanuel 1986). In general, we apply such a ronmental conditions favorable for severe weather, pro­ definition here; however, strict application is difficult cesses on the mesoscale initiate such storms, affect their since so many mesoscale phenomena are "multiscale." evolution, and influence their environment. A rich variety For example, a -100-km-Iong gust front can be less of mesocale processes are involved in severe weather, than -1 km across. The triggering of a storm by the ranging from environmental preconditioning to storm initi­ collision of gust fronts can actually occur on a ation to feedback of convection on the environment. In the -lOO-m scale (the microscale). Nevertheless, we will space available, it is not possible to treat all of these treat this overall process (and others similar to it) as processes in detail. Rather, we will introduce s~veral mesoscale since gust fronts are generally regarded as general classifications of mesoscale processes relatmg to mesoscale phenomena.
    [Show full text]
  • NATS 101 Section 13: Lecture 22 Fronts
    NATS 101 Section 13: Lecture 22 Fronts Last time we talked about how air masses are created. When air masses meet, or clash, the transition zone is called a front. The concept of “fronts” in weather developed from the idea of the front line of battle, specifically in Europe during World War I How are weather fronts analogous to battle fronts in a war? Which air mass “wins” depends on what type of front it is. Four types of fronts COLD FRONT: Cold air overtakes warm air. B to C WARM FRONT: Warm air overtakes cold air. C to D OCCLUDED FRONT: Cold air catches up to the warm front. C to Low pressure center STATIONARY FRONT: No movement of air masses. A to B Fronts and Extratropical Cyclones Feb. 24, 2007 Case In mid-latitudes, fronts are part of the structure of extratropical cyclones. Extratropical cyclones form because of the horizontal temperature gradient. How are they a part of the general circulation? Type of weather and air masses in relation to fronts: Feb. 24, 2007 case mPmP cPcP mTmT Characteristics of a front 1. Sharp temperature changes over a short distance 2. Changes in moisture content 3. Wind shifts 4. A lowering of surface pressure, or pressure trough 5. Clouds and precipitation We’ll see how these characteristics manifest themselves for fronts in North America using the example from Feb. 2007… COLDCOLD FRONTFRONT Horizontal extent: About 50 km AHEAD OF FRONT: Warm and southerly winds. Cirrus or cirrostratus clouds. Called the warm sector. AT FRONT: Pressure trough and wind shift.
    [Show full text]
  • Synoptic Conditions Favorable for the Formation of the 15 July 1995 Southeastern Canada/Northeastern U.S
    SYNOPTIC CONDITIONS FAVORABLE FOR THE FORMATION OF THE 15 JULY 1995 SOUTHEASTERN CANADA/NORTHEASTERN U.S. DERECHO EVENT Mace L. Bentley Climatology Research Laboratory Department of Geography The University of Georgia Athens, Georgia Abstract On 15 July 1995, a derecho-producing mesoscale convective system inflicted considerable damage through southeastern Canada and the northeastern U.S. The synoptic-scale environ­ ment that precluded and persisted during this event is examined \ using swface and upper-air observations, satellite imagery v""--- and numerical model data. Evidence suggests that low-level ~~- - . -,.~ .... moisture inflow and forcing were major factors in initiating \ .-..... ~".... ". and sustaining this progressive warm season derecho event. : "?-.,. ~.:"... Favorable upper-level dynamics produced by jet streak induced Kingston. Ontario circulations were also found over the region. Products from ..------------.:t i the Eta model run initialized 12 hours prior to the event were ". used in the study to fill in between the 0000 UTC and 1200 UTC upper-air sounding times. Manipulation of these data sets was accomplished using GEMPAK 5.2.1. Calculation of 850 hPa moisture transport vectors andfrontogenesis were found to be particularly useful in determining the derecho producing mesoscale convective system's genesis and propagation regions. Future investiga­ tions of these systems should employ these techniques in order to assess their forecast applications. Fig. 1. Approximate track of the DMCS cloud shield on 15 July 1995. 1. Introduction In the early morning hours of 15 July 1995, a derecho­ producing mesoscale convective system (hereafter, DMCS) moved from southern Canada through the northeastern United States (Fig. 1). Widespread wind damage was reported through­ out the Northeast.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 14. Extratropical Cyclones • in Mid-Latitudes, Much of Our Weather
    Lecture 14. Extratropical Cyclones • In mid-latitudes, much of our weather is associated with a particular kind of storm, the extratropical cyclone Cyclone: circulation around low pressure center Some midwesterners call tornadoes cyclones Tropical cyclone = hurricane • Extratropical cyclones derive their energy from horizontal temperature con- trasts. • They typically form on a boundary between a warm and a cold air mass associated with an upper tropospheric jet stream • Their circulations affect the entire troposphere over a region 1000 km or more across. • Extratropical cyclones tend to develop with a particular lifecycle . • The low pressure center moves roughly with the speed of the 500 mb wind above it. • An extratropical cyclone tends to focus the temperature contrasts into ‘fron- tal zones’ of particularly rapid horizontal temperature change. The Norwegian Cyclone Model In 1922, well before routine upper air observations began, Bjerknes and Sol- berg in Bergen, Norway, codified experience from analyzing surface weather maps over Europe into the Norwegian Cyclone Model, a conceptual picture of the evolution of an ET cyclone and associated frontal zones at ground They noted that the strongest temperature gradients usually occur at the warm edge of the frontal zone, which they called the front. They classified fronts into four types, each with its own symbol: Cold front - Cold air advancing into warm air Warm front - Warm air advancing into cold air Stationary front - Neither airmass advances Occluded front - Looks like a cold front
    [Show full text]