DOCSLIB.ORG

Griffin 330 0.85 of 65 Knots(Point (B)), the Speed for Best Endurance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Griffin 330 0.85 of 65 Knots(Point (B)), the Speed for Best Endurance Acknowledgements The Griffin design team wishes to acknowledge the following people and thank them for their guidance and assistance. Dr. Vengalattore T. Nagaraj - Senior Research Scientist, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. Inderjit Chopra - Interim Chair, Gessow Professor, and Director of Gessow Rotorcraft Center (AGRC), Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. J. Gordon Leishman - Minta Martin Professor of Engineering, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. Roberto Celi - Professor, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. Fredric Schmitz - Senior Research Professor, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. James Baeder - Associate Professor, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. Darryll J. Pines - Dean, Clark School of Engineering and Professor, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. Norman Wereley - Professor, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. Christopher Cadou - Associate Professor, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. Sean Humbert - Assistant Professor/Director, Autonomous Vehicle Laboratory, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. Shreyas Ananthan - Assistant Research Scientist, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park Jaye Falls, Jason Pereira, Peter Copp, Arun Jose, Monica Syal, Abhishek Roy, Moble Benedict, Vikram Hrishikeshavan, Brandon Bush, Nicholas Wilson, Daniel C. Sargent, Richard Sickenberger, Evan Ulrich, Ben Woods, Bradley Johnson, Ben Berry : Graduate students at the Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. Manikandan Ramasamy - NASA AMES Dr. Jinsong Bao - Dynamics and Acoustics, Sikorsky Aircraft, Co. Dr. Preston B. Martin - Research Scientist, NASA Ames Research Center Dr. A.R. Manjunath - Additional General Manager, Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, Bangalore, India.] LCDR Scott Stringer - MH-60S Class Desk, Naval Air Systems Command, NAS Patuxent RIver, MD Mr. Jeffrey DeBruin - Air Vehicle Engineering Department, Aeromechanics Division, Rotary Wing Performance Branch, Naval Air Systems Command, Patuxent River, MD Maryland State Police Aviation Command, Fredrick Station Section “Trooper 3”. 1 Contents Table of Contents ................................................. i List of Figures ................................................... vi List of Tables .................................................... ix RFP Compliance .................................................. x Executive Summary ................................................I 1 Introduction .................................................... 1 2 Vehicle Configuration Selection .......................................... 1 2.1 Identification of Design Drivers ...................................... 1 2.2 Selection of Baseline Helicopter ...................................... 1 2.3 Primary Mission Profile Determination .................................. 3 2.4 Quality FunctionDeployment ....................................... 3 2.4.1 Design Criteria - Value Engineering ............................... 3 2.5 Feasible VTOLTechnology ........................................ 4 2.5.1 Compounding .......................................... 4 2.5.2 StoppedRotor .......................................... 4 2.5.3 TipSpeedModulation ...................................... 6 2.5.4 Tilting Thrust .......................................... 6 2.5.5 VectoredThrust ......................................... 6 2.5.6 TorquelessRotor ......................................... 7 2.6 PughDecisionMatrix ........................................... 7 2.7 Trade Study of Tip Speed ModulationConcepts .............................. 7 2.8 Griffin’s Rotor/Drive System: VERITAS ................................. 9 3 Initial Sizing .................................................... 10 3.1 Descriptionof Methodology ........................................ 10 3.2 TradeStudies ................................................ 11 3.2.1 Choice ofBlade LoadingCoefficient .............................. 11 3.2.2 ChoiceofTipSpeed ....................................... 11 3.2.3 ChoiceofNumberofBlades .................................. 11 3.2.4 Choice of Rotor Solidity ..................................... 13 3.3 FinalConfiguration ............................................. 14 4 Drivetrain .................................................... 14 4.1 Configuration ................................................ 14 4.2 Engines ................................................... 15 4.3 Multi-SpeedGearbox ............................................ 16 i 4.3.1 AlternativeApproaches ..................................... 16 4.3.2 Operation ............................................ 16 4.3.3 DualClutch ........................................... 18 4.3.4 Geartrain ............................................. 19 4.3.5 GearSelection .......................................... 19 4.3.6 GearSynchronization ...................................... 20 4.3.7 Lubrication ........................................... 20 4.3.8 Housing ............................................. 20 4.3.9 FailureModes and EffectsAnalysis ............................... 21 4.4 MainRotorGearbox ............................................ 21 4.4.1 Design .............................................. 21 4.4.2 Housing ............................................. 23 4.4.3 Accessories ........................................... 23 4.5 ElectronicControls ............................................. 23 4.6 TailPropGearbox ............................................. 23 4.6.1 IntermediateGearbox ...................................... 24 4.6.2 SwivelingMechanism ...................................... 24 4.6.3 EmergencyRecall Mechanism ................................. 24 4.7 Maritime Considerations .......................................... 25 5 MainRotorandHubDesign ........................................... 25 5.1 Main Rotor AerodynamicDesign ..................................... 25 5.1.1 AirfoilSelection ......................................... 25 5.1.2 PlanformDesign ......................................... 26 5.1.3 Blade Twist ........................................... 27 5.1.4 BladeTaper ........................................... 27 5.1.5 DesignoftheTALONTip .................................... 27 5.2 Blade StructuralDesign .......................................... 29 5.2.1 ChoiceofMaterials ....................................... 29 5.2.2 Composite Coupling ....................................... 29 5.2.3 CompositeLay-UpandSizing ................................. 30 5.2.4 De-icingsystem ......................................... 30 5.2.5 Leading-edgeerosionguard ................................... 30 5.2.6 LightningProtection ....................................... 31 5.2.7 ElectromagneticShielding .................................... 31 5.2.8 Slip Ring ............................................. 31 5.3 Active Flaps for Vibration Control ..................................... 31 5.3.1 Selection of Trailing-Edge Flap Configuration ......................... 31 5.4 Vibration Reduction in the Griffin ..................................... 33 5.4.1 Definition of Vibration Levels .................................. 33 5.4.2 Vibration Reduction Attained Using Trailing-Edge Flaps ................... 34 5.5 Flap ActuationMechanism ......................................... 35 5.6 Active Vibration Control Scheme ..................................... 36 5.7 Performance Improvement with Trailing-Edge Flaps ........................... 36 5.8 SafetyAspects ............................................... 37 5.9 HubDesign ................................................. 37 5.9.1 RotorMast and Swashplate Assembly ............................. 37 5.9.2 Clover Plate ........................................... 38 ii 5.9.3 Elastomeric Frequency Adapter – Lead-Lag Damper ...................... 38 5.9.4 ElastomericConical Bearing .................................. 38 5.9.5 Bladefolding .......................................... 38 5.10 RotorDynamics .............................................. 39 5.10.1 Aeroelastic Stability Analysis .................................. 40 5.10.2 GroundResonance ........................................ 41 6 Empennage and Tail Prop Design ........................................ 42 6.1 EmpennageConstruction .......................................... 42 6.1.1 Tailboom ............................................. 42 6.1.2 H–tail .............................................. 42 6.1.3 CentralFin ............................................ 42 6.2 TailPropDesign .............................................. 43 6.3 Tail Prop Construction ........................................... 43 6.4 Accessibility ................................................ 44 7 Performance Analysis ............................................... 44 7.1 DragEstimation .............................................. 44 7.2 DragReduction ............................................... 45 7.2.1 FuselageDrag – Synthetic Jet Actuators ............................ 45 7.2.2 Rotor Hub, Pylon and Engine Installation ............................ 46 7.2.3 MainRotorDrag ......................................... 46 7.2.4 TailPropDrag .........................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AD 2012-0170R2 [Task 2014.211] TGB Oil Level and Magnetic Chip Detector Insp and Pitch Control Rod Bearing Insp
    EASA AD No.: 2012-0170R2 EASA AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE AD No.: 2012-0170R2 Date: 20 June 2014 Note: This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is issued by EASA, acting in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 on behalf of the European Community, its Member States and of the European third countries that participate in the activities of EASA under Article 66 of that Regulation. This AD is issued in accordance with EU 748/2012, Part 21.A.3B. In accordance with EC 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M.A.301, the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft shall be ensured by accomplishing any applicable ADs. Consequently, no person may operate an aircraft to which an AD applies, except in accordance with the requirements of that AD, unless otherwise specified by the Agency [EC 2042/2003 Annex I, Part M.A.303] or agreed with the Authority of the State of Registry [EC 216/2008, Article 14(4) exemption]. Design Approval Holder’s Name: Type/Model designation(s): AIRBUS HELICOPTERS SA 365, AS 365, SA 366 and EC 155 helicopters TCDS Number: EASA.R.105 Foreign AD: Not applicable Revision: This AD revises EASA AD 2012-0170R1, dated 18 October 2013. ATA 05 Time Limits and Maintenance Checks – Tail Rotor Gearbox (TGB) Oil Level and Magnetic Chip Detector – Inspection ATA 65 Tail Rotor – Pitch Control Rod Bearing – Inspection / Replacement Manufacturer(s): Airbus Helicopters (formerly Eurocopter, Eurocopter France, Aerospatiale). Applicability: SA 365 N1, AS 365 N2, AS 365 N3, SA 366 G1, EC 155 B and EC 155 B1 helicopters, all serial numbers, except those modified in accordance with Eurocopter (EC) modification (mod) 07 65B63.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense Appropriations for 2009
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS FOR 2009 HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEFENSE JOHN P. MURTHA, Pennsylvania, Chairman NORMAN D. DICKS, Washington C. W. BILL YOUNG, Florida PETER J. VISCLOSKY, Indiana DAVID L. HOBSON, Ohio JAMES P. MORAN, Virginia RODNEY P. FRELINGHUYSEN, New Jersey MARCY KAPTUR, Ohio TODD TIAHRT, Kansas ROBERT E. ‘‘BUD’’ CRAMER, JR., Alabama JACK KINGSTON, Georgia ALLEN BOYD, Florida KAY GRANGER, Texas STEVEN R. ROTHMAN, New Jersey SANFORD D. BISHOP, JR., Georgia NOTE: Under Committee Rules, Mr. Obey, as Chairman of the Full Committee, and Mr. Lewis, as Ranking Minority Member of the Full Committee, are authorized to sit as Members of all Subcommittees. PAUL JUOLA, GREG LANKLER, SARAH YOUNG, PAUL TERRY, KRIS MALLARD, LINDA PAGELSEN, ADAM HARRIS, ANN REESE, TIM PRINCE, BROOKE BOYER, MATT WASHINGTON, B G WRIGHT, CHRIS WHITE, CELES HUGHES, and ADRIENNE RAMSAY, Staff Assistants SHERRY L. YOUNG, Administrative Aide PART 4 Page Army Posture ............................................................................ 1 Army Acquisition Programs ................................................. 99 Navy Posture ............................................................................ 145 Navy / Marine Corps Acquisition Programs ...................... 279 Biological Countermeasures and Threats ......................... 325 Statements for the Record .................................................... 439
    [Show full text]
  • Central Asia in the Crossfire Survival Or War?
    WL KNO EDGE NCE ISM SA ER IS E A TE N K N O K C E N N T N I S E S J E N A 3 V H A A N H Z И O E P W O I T E D N E Z I A M I C O N O C C I O T N S H O E L C A I N M Z E N O T The Collective Security Treaty Organization, the Caspian and the Northern Distribution Network: Central Asia in the Crossfire Survival or War? ZHULDUZ BAIZAKOVA Republic of Kazakhstan Open Source, Foreign Perspective, Underconsidered/Understudied Topics The Foreign Military Studies Office (FMSO) at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, is an open source research organization of the U.S. Army. It was founded in 1986 as an innovative program that brought together military specialists and civilian academics to focus on military and security topics derived from unclassified, foreign media. Today FMSO maintains this research tradition of special insight and highly collaborative work by conducting unclassified research on foreign perspectives of defense and security issues that are understudied or unconsidered. Author Background Zhulduz Baizakova is a graduate from Kazakh National University and has a MSc degree in International Security and Global Governance, Birkbeck College, University of London, where she successfully defended her dissertation on NATO peacekeeping activities. She served for seven years in the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan, including a posting to the United Kingdom. Baizakova is currently specializing in defense and security issues in Central Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Ec145 Medstar/Police
    Eurocopter EC145 MEDSTAR/POLICE 04648-0389 2010 BY REVELL GmbH & CO. KG PRINTED IN GERMANY Eurocopter EC145 MEDSTAR/POLICE Eurocopter EC145 MEDSTAR/POLICE Die EC145 ist ein mittelschwerer zweimotoriger Hubschrauber der in Zusammenarbeit von Eurocopter und der The EC145 is a medium twin-engine helicopter that was developed in a co-operation between Eurocopter and japanischen Firma Kawasaki Heavy Industries entwickelt wurde. Dabei war die BK 117 C-1 - die von diesen the Japanese Company Kawasaki Heavy Industries. The initial design for the new helicopter designated BK117 Firmen bereits in Cooperation gebaut wurde – das Ausgangs muster für den neuen Hubschrauber vom Typ BK C-2, was the BK 117 C-1 which was already being built in a co-operation between the two companies. After 117 C-2 die nach der Übernahme der Pro duk tions linie die Eurocopter - Bezeichnung EC145 erhielt. Es war das acquisition of the production line by Eurocopter, the BK117C-2 was re-designated EC145. It was the interest Interesse der französischen Sécurité Civile (Zivilschutz und SAR-Aufgaben) und der Gendarmerie die nach einem shown by the French Sécurité Civile (Civil Defence and SAR-Missions) and the Gendarmerie (Civil Police) that, internationalen Wettbewerb im Dezember 1997 mit einem Großauftrag die Serienfertigung der EC145 möglich after an international competition in December 1997 made series production of the EC145 possible with the machten.( siehe auch REVELL-Bausatz No. 4482 Securité Civile ) Für die Flugerprobung wurden 4 Maschinen placement of a large order. (see also the REVELL Kit number 4482 Sécurité Civile). Four aircraft were built for gebaut die unterschiedliche Testaufgaben zu erfüllen hatten.
    [Show full text]
  • Helicopter Noise Reduction Technology, Status Report
    Helicopter Noise Reduction Technology Status Report 21 April 2015 Contributors: ICCAIA: Snecma, Airbus Helicopters, Sikorsky Aircraft, Bell Helicopter, AgustaWestland, Turbomeca, Marenco Swisshelicopter Research Centers: NASA, DLR, ONERA, JAXA 1 Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 2 Helicopter noise sources and related noise generation mechanisms ............................................................ 4 2.1 Rotor noise ........................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Anti-torque noise .................................................................................................................................. 4 2.3 Engine noise ......................................................................................................................................... 5 2.3.1 Turboshaft Engines.......................................................................................................................... 5 2.3.2 Piston Engines ................................................................................................................................. 5 2.4 Contribution of noise sources depending on flight condition .............................................................. 5 3 State-of-the-Art Helicopters ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Rotorcraft Crashworthiness – Trends Leading to Improved Survivability
    Advances in Rotorcraft Crashworthiness – Trends Leading to Improved Survivability Karen E. Jackson, Ph.D. Structural Dynamics Branch NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA 23681 NOMENCLATURE List of Symbols ° - unit of angle, degree(s) ft – unit of length, foot or feet g – acceleration relative to the acceleration of gravity Hz – unit of frequency, Hertz in – unit of length, inch lb – unit of weight or force, pound mm – unit of length, millimeter s – unit of time, second List of Acronyms AATD – Aviation Applied Technology Directorate AC – Advisory Circular ACAP – Advanced Composite Airframe Program ACSDG – Aircraft Crash Survival Design Guide ADS – Aeronautical Design Standard AH – Attack Helicopter AHSI – American Helicopter Society International ALE – Arbitrary Lagrange-Euler ARAC – Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee ATB - Articulated Total Body ATD – Anthropomorphic Test Device CAL3D - Cornell Aeronautics Laboratory Three Dimensional CIRA – Italian Aerospace Research Center CFR – Code of Federal Regulations CH – Cargo Helicopter CRC-ACS - Cooperative Research Centre for Advanced Composite Structures DAS – Data Acquisition System DEA – Deployable Energy Absorber DLR – German Aerospace Center DOD – Department of Defense EFG – Element Free Galerkin FAA – Federal Aviation Administration FM – Frequency Modulated FSC – Full Spectrum Crashworthiness 1 GHBMC – Global Human Body Model Consortium HIB – Hydro Impact Basin HSTM – Human Surrogate Torso Model HTFEM – Human Torso Finite Element Model IDRF – Impact Dynamics Research Facility
    [Show full text]
  • Eurocopter EC145 Sécurité Civile
    Eurocopter EC145 Sécurité Civile 04496-0389 2006 BY REVELL GmbH & CO. KG PRINTED IN GERMANY Eurocopter EC 145 Sécurité Civile Eurocopter EC 145 Sécurité Civile L’EC 145 est un hélicoptère moyen bimoteur développé en collaboration par Ultramodern multi-purpose helicopter! Eurocopter et la firme japonaise Kawasaki Heavy Industries. The EC145 is a medium-heavy twin-engine helicopter developed in co-operation Le BK 117C-1 – qui avait déjà été construit en coopération par ces deux firmes – by Eurocopter and the Japanese company Kawasaki Heavy Industries. a été la base de développement du nouveau modèle BK 117C-2, qui a été rebap- tisé EC 145 lors de la reprise de la ligne de production. The new helicopter BK 117C-2 – this designation was changed to EC145 after the take-over of the production line – was based on another co-operate production L’intérêt montré par la Sécurité Civile et par la Gendarmerie française a été la of the two firms, the BK 117C-1. base d’une grosse commande qui, après un appel d’offres international, a lancé en décembre 1997 la construction en série de l’EC 145. It was due to the placement of a large order by the French Sécurité Civile (civil defence and SAR sorties) and French police force after an international compe- Quatre appareils ont été construits pour les essais en vol, qui ont servi à réaliser tition in December 1997 that the de nombreux tests. Alors que le premier appareil avait déjà effectué son premier vol le 12 juin 1999à Donauwörth (Allemagne), le troisième prototype allemand – production of the EC 145 could take off.
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Aviation Headline News
    ISSN 1718-7966 JuLy 8, 2019/ VOL. 697 www.avitrader.com Weekly Aviation Headline News WORLD NEWS Pegasus teams up with Expedia Partner Solutions Low-cost Turkish carrier Pegasus Airlines is joining forces with Expe- dia Partner Solutions (EPS), the B2B brand of Expedia Group, to offer its travellers access to competitive ac- commodation and package rates in order to keep up with Turkey’s rapid increase in both domestic and inter- national tourism. Through Hotels. com for Partners, Pegasus’s travellers will have access to competitive pack- age rates (where accommodation is bundled with a flight) saving them 15% on average when compared SAA’s with booking these separately. A340-600s will be phased out of the Etihad lanches A380s to Seoul JFK route. Etihad launched its first Airbus A380 Photo: Airbus ‘super jumbo’ on its scheduled dai- ly services to Seoul, Korea. Robin Kamark, Etihad Aviation Group Chief South African codeshares with GOL Commercial Officer, said: “We are de- And aims to bring A350 operations to New York lighted to include Seoul as one of our most important destinations on the South African Airways (SAA) has GOL in the domestic Brazilian mar- operated by SAA to Africa, Asia and Etihad network with the increased ca- signed codeshare and frequent fly- ket extends SAA’s reach throughout Australia, and Voyager members pacity and flagship flying experience er agreements with Brazilian airline Brazil. can accrue and redeem Voyager only the A380 can provide. The move Gol - Linhas Aéreas (GOL). miles on flights operated by GOL.
    [Show full text]
  • TWENTY FIFTH EUROPEAN ROTORCRAFT FORUM Paper No
    TWENTY FIFTH EUROPEAN ROTORCRAFT FORUM Paper no. C13 ACTIVE SUPPRESSION OF STALL ON HELICOPTER ROTORS BY KHANH NGUYEN ARMY/NASA ROTORCRAFT DIVISION NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER, MOFFETT FIELD, CA SEPTEMBER 14-16, 1999 ROME ITALY ASSOCIAZIONE INDUSTRIE PER L’AEROSPAZIO, I SYSTEMI E LA DIFESA ASSOCIAZIONE ITALIANA DI AERONAUTICA ED ASTRONAUTICA Active Suppression of Stall on Helicopter Rotors Khanh Nguyen Army/NASA Rotorcraft Division NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA to the large angle of attack requirement on the re- Abstract treating side. This paper describes the numerical analysis of Operating in an unsteady environment, the a stall suppression system for helicopter rotors. The blade encounters the most severe type of stall analysis employs a finite element method and in- known as dynamic stall. In forward flight, the blade cludes advanced dynamic stall and vortex wake experiences time-varying dynamic pressure and models. The stall suppression system is based on a angle of attack arising from blade pitch inputs, elas- transfer function matrix approach and uses blade tic responses, and non-uniform rotor inflow. If root actuation to suppress stall directly. The rotor supercritical flow develops under dynamic condi- model used in this investigation is the UH-60A tions, then dynamic stall is initiated by leading edge rotor. At a severe stalled condition, the analysis or shock-induced separation. Even with limited predicts three distinct stall events spreading over the understanding about the development of supercriti- retreating side of the rotor disk. Open loop results cal flow in the rotor environment, flow visualization show that 2P input can reduce stall only moderately, results of oscillating airfoil tests at low Mach num- while the other input harmonics are less effective.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the NASA Systems Approach to Crashworthiness Program
    Overview of the NASA Systems Approach to Crashworthiness Program Lisa E. Jones NASA Langley Research Center l.e.j ones @ larc.nasa.gov Hampton, VA Abstract The NASA Aviation Safety Program was developed in response to the federal government's goal to reduce the fatal accident rate for aviation by 80% within 10 years. ACcident Mitigation is a primary element of the Aviation Safety Program. The overall Accident Mitigation goal is to provide technology to the air transport industry to enable a decrease in the rate of fatalities and injury from crash loads and from in-flight and post- crash explosion and/or fire. Accident Mitigation is divided into two main elements - Fire Prevention and Systems Approach to Crashworthiness. The Systems Approach to Crashworthiness goal is to develop and promote technology that will increase the human survival rate or reduce the fatality rate in survivable accidents. The technical background and planning, selected technical activities, and summary of future efforts will be presented in this paper. Introduction February 1997 a national goal to reduce the fatal accident rate for aviation by 80 According to the Gore Commission final percent within 10 years. report, the worldwide demand for air travel is expected to double or triple by In response to the presidential 2017 with the requirement for $1 trillion announcement, NASA initiated the in new aircraft deliveries [1]. Without Aviation Safety Investment Strategy decreasing the accident rate, such a Team (ASIST), which sponsored four traffic volume would lead to 50 or more industry- and government-wide major accidents a year. Given the very workshops to define research needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Improved Vehicle Crashworthiness Design by Control of the Energy Absorption for Different Collision Situations
    Improved vehicle crashworthiness design by control of the energy absorption for different collision situations Citation for published version (APA): Witteman, W. J. (1999). Improved vehicle crashworthiness design by control of the energy absorption for different collision situations. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven. https://doi.org/10.6100/IR518429 DOI: 10.6100/IR518429 Document status and date: Published: 01/01/1999 Document Version: Publisher’s PDF, also known as Version of Record (includes final page, issue and volume numbers) Please check the document version of this publication: • A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.
    [Show full text]
  • Heavy Lift Tandem
    2005 Georgia Tech Heavy Lift Tandem Acknowledgements We wish to thank the following individuals for their special assistance: Dr. Daniel P. Schrage Dr. Robert G. Loewy Dr. Lakshmi Sankar Dr. Jou-Young Choi Hangil Chae Chang Chen Srinivas Jonnalagadda CAPT Andy Bellochio Academic Credit All members of this design team received academic credit for this proposal. This design was the capstone project for AE6334, Rotorcraft Design II, a four-hour credit graduate course offered by Georgia Tech and instructed by Dr. Schrage. 2005 Georgia Tech Graduate Design Team _____________________________ ____________________________ Aaron Pridgen (Masters Student) Ludvic Baquie (Masters Student) _____________________________ ____________________________ Alex Moodie (Ph. D. Student) Mandy Goltsch (Ph. D. Student) _____________________________ ____________________________ Byung-Young Min (Ph. D. Student) Sameer Hameer (Masters Student) _____________________________ ____________________________ Dominic Scola (Masters Student) Vivek Kaul (Masters Student) _____________________________ James Rigsby (Ph. D. Student) i 2005 Georgia Tech Heavy Lift Tandem Executive Summary The need for rapid vertical deployment of the Future Combat System (FCS) from ship to shore necessitates the generation of new designs in Heavy-Lift VTOL rotorcraft. Special considerations, such as their shipboard capability and performance constraints, were outlined in the 2005 Request For Proposal (RFP) as part of the 22nd Annual Student Design Competition sponsored by Boeing and AHS International. A graduate team from the Georgia Institute of Technology presents their results for the preliminary design of a configuration capable of performing all mission profile requirements and meeting all required system capabilities. The Georgia Tech Tandem (GTT) is their proposal for this competition. The GTT was generated through a series of system level processes and analyses beginning with the decomposition of a clear problem statement.
    [Show full text]