DOCSLIB.ORG

Heavy Lift Tandem

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Heavy Lift Tandem 2005 Georgia Tech Heavy Lift Tandem Acknowledgements We wish to thank the following individuals for their special assistance: Dr. Daniel P. Schrage Dr. Robert G. Loewy Dr. Lakshmi Sankar Dr. Jou-Young Choi Hangil Chae Chang Chen Srinivas Jonnalagadda CAPT Andy Bellochio Academic Credit All members of this design team received academic credit for this proposal. This design was the capstone project for AE6334, Rotorcraft Design II, a four-hour credit graduate course offered by Georgia Tech and instructed by Dr. Schrage. 2005 Georgia Tech Graduate Design Team _____________________________ ____________________________ Aaron Pridgen (Masters Student) Ludvic Baquie (Masters Student) _____________________________ ____________________________ Alex Moodie (Ph. D. Student) Mandy Goltsch (Ph. D. Student) _____________________________ ____________________________ Byung-Young Min (Ph. D. Student) Sameer Hameer (Masters Student) _____________________________ ____________________________ Dominic Scola (Masters Student) Vivek Kaul (Masters Student) _____________________________ James Rigsby (Ph. D. Student) i 2005 Georgia Tech Heavy Lift Tandem Executive Summary The need for rapid vertical deployment of the Future Combat System (FCS) from ship to shore necessitates the generation of new designs in Heavy-Lift VTOL rotorcraft. Special considerations, such as their shipboard capability and performance constraints, were outlined in the 2005 Request For Proposal (RFP) as part of the 22nd Annual Student Design Competition sponsored by Boeing and AHS International. A graduate team from the Georgia Institute of Technology presents their results for the preliminary design of a configuration capable of performing all mission profile requirements and meeting all required system capabilities. The Georgia Tech Tandem (GTT) is their proposal for this competition. The GTT was generated through a series of system level processes and analyses beginning with the decomposition of a clear problem statement. A measure of merit for designs and their comparison was created in an Overall Evaluation Criteria (OEC). Then an initial concept selection indicated that a tandem type rotorcraft would best meet the RFP requirements, and—through a detailed sizing and synthesis process utilizing the RF Method—the pure tandem configuration was chosen as the proposal candidate. Special consideration was made to justify and validate all the results that led to the GTT selection. Preliminary design of the GTT continued through the entire range of rotorcraft design disciplines as the selection of design parameters continued with greater fidelity. An aerodynamic analysis of the main rotor and hub design that included aircraft performance was performed. Then other aspects of the hub design were determined that included results of the blade dynamics. A broad structural design for the GTT is proposed as well as details for the aircraft’s stability and control design. Additionally, the power plant selection and unique drive system design are presented. Finally, an evaluation of the GTT cost analysis is summarized. All the elements of GTT design combine to offer the best proposal for the Heavy Lift VTOL Aircraft requested in the 22nd Student Design Competition. ii 2005 Georgia Tech Heavy Lift Tandem Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................................... I ACADEMIC CREDIT .................................................................................................................................. I 2005 GEORGIA TECH GRADUATE DESIGN TEAM............................................................................ I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................................II TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................... III LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................................... V LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................... VI LIST OF ACRONYMS ........................................................................................................................... VIII LIST OF SYMBOLS .................................................................................................................................. IX COMPLIANCE MATRIX ........................................................................................................................... X 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 1 2 FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................... 1 2.1 FUNCTIONAL DECOMPOSITION ....................................................................................................... 1 2.2 PROBLEM STATEMENT .................................................................................................................... 3 3 AIRCRAFT CONFIGURATION TRADE STUDY ......................................................................... 3 3.1 CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................................................... 3 3.1.1 Single Main Rotor ............................................................................................. 3 3.1.2 Tandem .............................................................................................................. 4 3.1.3 Tilt Rotor ........................................................................................................... 4 3.1.4 Quad Tilt Rotor ................................................................................................. 5 3.1.5 Slowed Rotor Compound .................................................................................. 5 3.2 PRELIMINARY CONCEPT ANALYSIS - OVERALL EVALUATION CRITERIA ........................................ 6 3.3 TANDEM ROTOR TRADE-OFF STUDY .............................................................................................. 8 3.4 CONFIGURATION ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................... 9 3.5 CONFIGURATION SELECTION – OEC ANALYSIS ........................................................................... 11 4 PERFORMANCE .............................................................................................................................. 13 4.1 DRAG BUILDUP............................................................................................................................. 14 4.2 PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................ 15 4.3 AUTOROTATION ............................................................................................................................ 18 5 ROTOR DESIGN .............................................................................................................................. 20 5.1 ROTOR DIAMETER ........................................................................................................................ 20 5.2 TIP SPEED ..................................................................................................................................... 20 5.3 BLADE AREA ................................................................................................................................ 21 5.4 SOLIDITY ...................................................................................................................................... 21 5.5 BLADE TWIST AND TAPER ............................................................................................................ 22 5.6 AIRFOIL DESIGN ........................................................................................................................... 23 5.7 BLADE TIP DESIGN ....................................................................................................................... 30 5.8 ROOT CUT-OUT ............................................................................................................................ 31 6 HUB DESIGN .................................................................................................................................... 31 6.1 SELECTION OF CANDIDATE HUB SYSTEMS ................................................................................... 31 6.2 HINGE OFFSET AND POWER BLADE FOLDING ............................................................................... 32 6.3 MATERIAL SELECTION .................................................................................................................. 33 6.4 ROTOR HUB WEIGHTS AND PARTS COUNT ................................................................................... 33 6.5 CONTROL POWER REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................... 34 6.6 CONTROL POWER IN AUTOROTATION ........................................................................................... 34 6.7 PRECISION MANEUVERING/CARGO HANDLING ............................................................................ 34 iii 2005
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TWENTY FIFTH EUROPEAN ROTORCRAFT FORUM Paper No
    TWENTY FIFTH EUROPEAN ROTORCRAFT FORUM Paper no. C13 ACTIVE SUPPRESSION OF STALL ON HELICOPTER ROTORS BY KHANH NGUYEN ARMY/NASA ROTORCRAFT DIVISION NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER, MOFFETT FIELD, CA SEPTEMBER 14-16, 1999 ROME ITALY ASSOCIAZIONE INDUSTRIE PER L’AEROSPAZIO, I SYSTEMI E LA DIFESA ASSOCIAZIONE ITALIANA DI AERONAUTICA ED ASTRONAUTICA Active Suppression of Stall on Helicopter Rotors Khanh Nguyen Army/NASA Rotorcraft Division NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA to the large angle of attack requirement on the re- Abstract treating side. This paper describes the numerical analysis of Operating in an unsteady environment, the a stall suppression system for helicopter rotors. The blade encounters the most severe type of stall analysis employs a finite element method and in- known as dynamic stall. In forward flight, the blade cludes advanced dynamic stall and vortex wake experiences time-varying dynamic pressure and models. The stall suppression system is based on a angle of attack arising from blade pitch inputs, elas- transfer function matrix approach and uses blade tic responses, and non-uniform rotor inflow. If root actuation to suppress stall directly. The rotor supercritical flow develops under dynamic condi- model used in this investigation is the UH-60A tions, then dynamic stall is initiated by leading edge rotor. At a severe stalled condition, the analysis or shock-induced separation. Even with limited predicts three distinct stall events spreading over the understanding about the development of supercriti- retreating side of the rotor disk. Open loop results cal flow in the rotor environment, flow visualization show that 2P input can reduce stall only moderately, results of oscillating airfoil tests at low Mach num- while the other input harmonics are less effective.
    [Show full text]
  • Bramwell's Helicopter Dynamics
    Bramwell’s Helicopter Dynamics Bramwell’s Helicopter Dynamics Second edition A. R. S. Bramwell George Done David Balmford Oxford Auckland Boston Johannesburg Melbourne New Delhi Butterworth-Heinemann Linacre House, Jordan Hill, Oxford OX2 8DP 225 Wildwood Avenue, Woburn, MA 01801-2041 A division of Reed Educational and Professional Publishing Ltd A member of the Reed Elsevier plc group First published by Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd 1976 Second edition published by Butterworth-Heinemann 2001 © A. R. S. Bramwell, George Done and David Balmford 2001 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any material form (including photocopying or storing in any medium by electronic means and whether or not transiently or incidentally to some other use of this publication) without the written permission of the copyright holder except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 or under the terms of a licence issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London, England W1P OLP. Applications for the copyright holder’s written permission to reproduce any part of this publication should be addressed to the publishers British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Bramwell, A.R.S. Bramwell’s helicopter dynamics. – 2nd ed. 1 Helicopters – Aerodynamics I Title II Done, George III Balmford, David IV Helicopter dynamics 629.1′33352 Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication Data Bramwell, A.R.S. Bramwell’s helicopter dynamics / A.R.S. Bramwell, George Done, David Balmford. –2nd ed. p. cm. Rev. ed. of: Helicopter dynamics. c1976 Includes index ISBN 0 7506 5075 3 1 Helicopter–Dynamics 2 Helicopters–Aerodynamics I Done, George Taylor Sutton II Balmford, David III Bramwell, A.R.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Malovrhdissertationfinal.Pdf
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Department or Aerospace Engineering NON-HARMONIC ROOT-PITCH INDIVIDUAL-BLADE CONTROL FOR THE REDUCTION OF BLADE-VORTEX INTERACTION NOISE IN ROTORCRAFT A Dissertation in Aerospace Engineering by Brendon D. Malovrh 2012 Brendon D. Malovrh Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2012 The dissertation of Brendon D. Malovrh was reviewed and approved* by the following: Farhan S. Gandhi Professor of Aerospace Engineering Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Kenneth S. Brentner Professor of Aerospace Engineering Edward C. Smith Professor of Aerospace Engineering Christopher Rahn Professor of Mechanical Engineering Kevin W. Noonan Aerospace Engineer NASA Langley Research Center George A. Lesieutre Professor of Aerospace Engineering Head of the Department of Aerospace Engineering *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT One of the greatest obstacles to public acceptance of rotorcraft is the high levels of noise they produce, particularly in low-speed descent. In this flight condition, the trailing edge vortex of one blade often passes in close proximity to other blades resulting in impulsive changes in lift. This Blade-Vortex Interaction (BVI) creates high levels of both noise and vibration. The objective of this dissertation is to evaluate the effectiveness of using physically motivated pulse-type Individual Blade Control for reducing the noise associated with the BVI. First, the major parameters that affect the severity of the interaction, such as vortex strength and blade-vortex miss-distance, are analyzed. Second, inputs designed specifically to alter the parameters previously identified as key are explored, resulting in elimination of advancing side noise and overall peak BVI Sound Pressure Level (BVISPL) reductions of up to 4.6 dB.
    [Show full text]
  • The Royal Aircraft Establishment Farnborough 100 Years of Innovative Research, Development and Application
    Journal of Aeronautical History Paper 2020/04 The Royal Aircraft Establishment Farnborough 100 years of Innovative Research, Development and Application Dr Graham Rood Farnborough Air Sciences Trust (FAST) Formerly Head of Man Machine Integration (MMI) Dept. RAE Farnborough ABSTRACT Aviation research and development has been carried out in Great Britain for well over a century. Starting with balloons in the army at Woolwich Arsenal in 1878, progressing through kites and dirigibles in 1907, through to the first practical aeroplanes, the B.E.1 and B.E.2, designed and built by the Royal Aircraft Factory in April 1911. At this time Mervyn O’Gorman was installed as the Superintendent of the Army Aircraft Factory and began to gather the best scientists and engineers and bring scientific methods to the design and testing of aeroplanes. Renamed the Royal Aircraft Factory (RAF) in April 1912, it designed, built and tested aircraft, engines and aircraft systems throughout WW1. In 1918 its title was changed to the Royal Aircraft Establishment (RAE) to avoid confusion with the newly formed Royal Air Force. From then on RAE Farnborough and its outstations, including Bedford and Pyestock, developed into the biggest aviation research and development establishment in Europe and one of the best known names in aviation, working in all the disciplines necessary to build and test aircraft in their entirety. On the 1st April 1991 the RAE ceased to exist. The Establishment was renamed the Aerospace Division of the Defence Research Agency (DRA) and remained an executive agency of the UK Ministry of Defence (MOD). It was the start of changing its emphasis from research to gain and extend knowledge to more commercially focussed concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • Helicopter Blade Twist Optimization in Forward Flight Aerospace
    Helicopter Blade Twist Optimization in Forward Flight Marco Lonoce Thesis to obtain the Master of Science Degree in Aerospace Engineering Supervisor(s): Prof. Filipe Szolnoky Ramos Pinto Cunha Examination Committee Chairperson: Prof. Fernando José Parracho Lau Supervisor: Prof. Filipe Szolnoky Ramos Pinto Cunha Member of the Committee: Prof. João Manuel Gonçalves de Sousa Oliveira November 2016 ii To my father... iii iv Acknowledgments I want to start by thanking Professor Filipe Cunha for the theme of thesis and for his help during the work. Every meeting was really important to understand the correct direction to the end of this thesis. My university in Italy, Politecnico di Torino, that gives me the opportunity of a Double Degree Project with the Instituto Superior Tecnico in Lisbon, Portugal. It was fundamental the heavy work between the coordinator of the two universities to create this new project. The important help that the government of Italy and Piedmont region gave me as scholarship and student residence every year. My family and specially my father that couldn’t see the end of my studies. They believed me in every choice that I took. Finally, all of people that were not mentioned but gave a contribution to this thesis. v vi Resumo O incremento da eficienciaˆ do helicoptero´ e´ um aspecto fundamental a ter em considerac¸ao˜ no desenvolvimento inicial do helicoptero.´ Este ponto pode ser conseguido de varias´ maneiras. Em relac¸ao˜ a` potenciaˆ consumida ha´ certos aspectos ligados a` aerodinamicaˆ do rotor que precisam de ser tomados em conta, em especial a potenciaˆ induzida aquela que e´ necessaria´ fornecer ao rotor para este gerar a propulsao.˜ E´ poss´ıvel minimizar esta potenciaˆ uniformizando a velocidade induzida ao longo da pa´ para todas as posic¸oes˜ azimutais.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 BERP IV Aerodynamics, Performance and Flight Envelope
    BERP IV Aerodynamics, Performance and Flight Envelope Kevin Robinson Senior Engineer, Aerodynamics Alan Brocklehurst Principal Engineer, Aerodynamics AgustaWestland Helicopters Yeovil, Somerset, United Kingdom ABSTRACT This paper summarises the aerodynamic design and flight test performance results from the AW101 BERP IV Technology Demonstrator Programme that commenced in October 1997 and concluded in summer 2007. Aerodynamically, BERP IV represents a development of the BERP III main rotor blade whilst changes were also made to the dynamic and structural design. New blade technologies were introduced whilst the blade manufacturing process was also improved. The paper covers the aerodynamic design process including considerations on twist, aerofoils and planform shape, and the analytical and test techniques used to study and evaluate the blade performance. The main rotor was demonstrated on the AW101 aircraft from September 2006, and the paper details the hover and forward flight performance, and the retreating blade stall envelope. NOMENCLATURE operated since the early 1970’s. The programmes have sought to advance technology in aeromechanics, materials 1R Once-per-revolution and manufacturing to improve the design of rotor blades. D Drag The technology has been widely utilised within IGE In Ground Effect AgustaWestland and has enhanced the capability of the L Lift aircraft. The BERP IV programme (beginning October n Nominal rotor speed 1997) looked to build upon previous technology developed OGE Out of Ground Effect in BERP I, II and III in terms of composite manufacture, TAS True Air Speed materials, structure and aeromechanics, but with a wider W Weight remit. The objective of BERP IV was to provide benefits δ Pressure ratio across all aspects of aircraft performance and cost.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics
    P1: SYV/SPH P2: SYV/UKS QC: SYV/UKS T1: SYV CB268-FM April 26, 2002 17:42 Char Count= 0 Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics J. GORDON LEISHMAN University of Maryland P1: SYV/SPH P2: SYV/UKS QC: SYV/UKS T1: SYV CB268-FM April 26, 2002 17:42 Char Count= 0 TO MY STUDENTS in appreciation of all they have taught me PUBLISHED BY THE PRESS SYNDICATE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, UK 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011-4211, USA 10 Stamford Road, Oakleigh, VIC 3166, Australia Ruiz de Alarcon´ 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain Dock House, The Waterfront, Cape Town 8001, South Africa http://www.cambridge.org C Cambridge University Press 2000 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2000 Reprinted with corrections 2001 Printed in the United States of America Typeface Times Roman 10/12 pt. System LATEX2ε [TB] A catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Leishman, J. Gordon. Principles of helicopter aerodynamics / J. Gordon Leishman. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references (p. ). ISBN 0-521-66060-2 (hardcover) 1. Helicopters – Aerodynamics. TL716.L43 2000 629.133352 – dc21 99-38291 CIP ISBN 0 521 66060 2 hardback P1: SYV/SPH P2: SYV/UKS QC:
    [Show full text]
  • Griffin 330 0.85 of 65 Knots(Point (B)), the Speed for Best Endurance
    Acknowledgements The Griffin design team wishes to acknowledge the following people and thank them for their guidance and assistance. Dr. Vengalattore T. Nagaraj - Senior Research Scientist, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. Inderjit Chopra - Interim Chair, Gessow Professor, and Director of Gessow Rotorcraft Center (AGRC), Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. J. Gordon Leishman - Minta Martin Professor of Engineering, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. Roberto Celi - Professor, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. Fredric Schmitz - Senior Research Professor, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. James Baeder - Associate Professor, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. Darryll J. Pines - Dean, Clark School of Engineering and Professor, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. Norman Wereley - Professor, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. Christopher Cadou - Associate Professor, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. Sean Humbert - Assistant Professor/Director, Autonomous Vehicle Laboratory, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. Shreyas Ananthan - Assistant Research Scientist, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park Jaye Falls, Jason Pereira, Peter Copp, Arun Jose, Monica Syal, Abhishek Roy, Moble Benedict, Vikram Hrishikeshavan, Brandon Bush, Nicholas Wilson, Daniel C. Sargent, Richard Sickenberger, Evan Ulrich, Ben Woods, Bradley Johnson, Ben Berry : Graduate students at the Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. Manikandan Ramasamy - NASA AMES Dr. Jinsong Bao - Dynamics and Acoustics, Sikorsky Aircraft, Co. Dr. Preston B.
    [Show full text]
  • 3Rd Annual Technical Workshop Programme & Book of Abstracts
    3rd Annual Technical Workshop Shrigley Hall Hotel, Cheshire 22nd – 23rd May 2017 Supported by: Programme & Book of Abstracts ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! Introduction! ! ! ! UK!Vertical!Lift!Network:!3rd!Technical!Workshop! ! Welcome!to!the!UK!VLN!Technical!Workshop,!an!annual!event!showcasing!the!UK’s!cutting!edge! research! in! rotary! wing! research.! Now! in! its! third! year,! this! event! provides! a! platform! for! technical!discussions!on!all!things!rotorcraft,(from!whirl!flutter!to!active!twist.!For!the!second! year!running,!we!meet!at!picturesque!Shrigley!Hall!Country!House,!nestled!in!the!Cheshire!hills! overlooking!Greater!Manchester!to!the!north.! ! We!would!like!to!thank!all!our!presenters,!who!have!provided!the!abstracts!contain!herewith!in.! The!programme!for!these!two!days!consists!of!19!presentations!on!a!range!of!subjects.!This!is!an! increase! on! last! year,! which! shows! that! we! are! moving! on! a! positive! gradient,! growing! the! rotorcraft!research!community!–!one!of!the!core!aims!of!the!Vertical!Lift!Network.! ! Traditionally,!the!programme!of!presentations!has!been!categorised!by!the!traditional!research! areas:!aerodynamics,!dynamics,!flight!mechanics!and!so!on.!However,!this!year!we!have!decided! to!group!the!sessions!according!to!more!specific!subject!areas,!to!reflect!the!multiNdisciplinary! nature!of!rotorcraft!research!and!draw!attention!to!some!of!the!key!challenges!in!the!field.!We! have!a!total!of!seven!sessions!running!consecutively!over!the!next!two!days:! ! • Whirl!Flutter! • Propellers!
    [Show full text]
  • 7145 2 Ii O<12I5
    SOME RECENT APPLICATIONS OF NAVIER-STOKES CODES TO ROTORCRAFr WJ. McCroskey N 9 3 - 7145 2 f SeniorResearchScientist ii o<12i5 U.S.Army AeroflightdynamicsDircctoram(AVSCOM) andNASA Ames ResearchCenter MoffettField,California ABSTRACT Many operational limitations of helicopters and other rotary-wing aircraft are due to nonlinear aerodynamic phenomena, including unsteady, three-dimensional transonic and separated flow near the surfaces and highly vortical flow in the wakes of rotating blades. Modern computational fluid dynamics (CFD) technology offers new tools to study and simulate these complex flows. However, existing Euler and Navier-Stokes codes have to be modified significantly for rotorcraft applications, and the enormous computational requirements presently limit their use in routine design applications. Nevertheless, the Euler/Navier-Stokes technology is progressing in anticipation of future supercomputers that will enable meaningful calculations to be made for complete rotorcraft configurations. L INTRODUCTION advanced CFD techniques to fixed-wing aircraft suggest that improved predictive tools are highly desirable for all The flow fields of helicopters and other rotorcraft provide a rich variety of challenging problems in applied flight vehicles. Such methodology should help to reduce the risks and testing requirementsfor new designs, and it aerodynamics.Much of theflowneartherotating blades isnonlinear,three-dimensional,and oftenunsteady,with should enable engineers to increase rotorcraft periodicregionsof transonicflownearthebladetips,and
    [Show full text]