Revised Draft Big Bear Lake Tmdl Action Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Revised Draft Big Bear Lake Tmdl Action Plan REVISED DRAFT BIG BEAR LAKE TMDL ACTION PLAN Prepared for Big Bear Lake Nutrient TMDL Task Force August 26, 2010 9665 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 201 San Diego, California 92123 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Big Bear Lake TMDL Action Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................................ III LIST OF FIGURES........................................................................................................................................................ V LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................................................... VI LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................................................... VII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Watershed Setting ........................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Big Bear Lake Watershed and Lake Characteristics .................................................................................... 1-5 1.3 Big Bear Lake Water Quality ........................................................................................................................ 1-7 1.4 Regulatory Context ....................................................................................................................................... 1-9 1.4.1 TMDL Development .......................................................................................................................... 1-9 1.4.2 Big Bear Lake Nutrient TMDL Task Force ...................................................................................... 1-11 1.5 Other Related Activities .............................................................................................................................. 1-11 1.5.1 Nuisance Aquatic Plant Management ............................................................................................. 1-11 1.5.2 Fisheries Management ................................................................................................................... 1-12 1.5.3 Model Updates ................................................................................................................................ 1-12 2. SEDIMENT NUTRIENT REDUCTION PLAN .......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Approach ...................................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Findings ........................................................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.2.1 Water Level Management ................................................................................................................. 2-2 2.2.2 Dredging ........................................................................................................................................... 2-3 2.2.3 Lake Treatment ................................................................................................................................. 2-9 2.2.4 Aeration and Destratification ........................................................................................................... 2-14 2.2.5 Other Possible Activities ................................................................................................................. 2-24 2.3 Recommendations ...................................................................................................................................... 2-24 2.3.1 Alternatives Screening .................................................................................................................... 2-25 2.3.2 Sediment Disposal and Beneficial Re-use: Planning for the Future................................................ 2-26 2.3.3 Updates to Lake Monitoring Plan .................................................................................................... 2-28 2.3.4 Comprehensive Schedule ............................................................................................................... 2-28 2.3.5 Summary and Perspective .............................................................................................................. 2-29 3. WET WEATHER STRATEGIES FOR CONTROLLING NUTRIENT INPUTS TO BIG BEAR LAKE ....................... 3-1 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Overview of Best Management Practices ..................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2.1 Overview of Nutrient Removal Mechanisms ..................................................................................... 3-1 3.2.2 BMPs for Nutrient Removal .............................................................................................................. 3-2 3.2.3 Performance Locally ......................................................................................................................... 3-4 iii Use of contents on this sheet is subject to the limitations specified at the end of this document. S01255.Revised Draft_Big Bear LakeTMDL Action Plan 8-26-2010.docx Table of Contents Big Bear Lake TMDL Action Plan 3.2.4 Nutrient Removal Efficiencies ........................................................................................................... 3-6 3.2.5 Nonstructural and Operational BMPs ............................................................................................... 3-7 3.3 Project Approach .......................................................................................................................................... 3-8 3.3.1 Review of BMP Documents .............................................................................................................. 3-8 3.4 Interview Findings ....................................................................................................................................... 3-11 3.4.1 City of Big Bear Lake ...................................................................................................................... 3-11 3.4.2 San Bernardino County Flood Control District ................................................................................ 3-12 3.4.3 San Bernardino County ................................................................................................................... 3-12 3.4.4 US Forest Service ........................................................................................................................... 3-12 3.4.5 Big Bear Mountain Resorts ............................................................................................................. 3-13 3.4.6 California Department of Transportation ......................................................................................... 3-13 3.5 Implementation of BMPs ............................................................................................................................. 3-14 3.5.1 Opportunities and Constraints ........................................................................................................ 3-14 3.5.2 Costs ............................................................................................................................................... 3-14 3.6 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................................ 3-17 4. NUSIANCE AND NOXIOUS AQUATIC PLANT MANAGEMENT PLAN ................................................................. 4-1 4.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.1 NAPMP Objectives ........................................................................................................................... 4-2 4.1.2 Problem Statement ........................................................................................................................... 4-3 4.2 Background ................................................................................................................................................... 4-3 4.2.1 Aquatic Plant Species in Big Bear Lake ............................................................................................ 4-4 4.2.2 Historical Aquatic Plant Management Efforts .................................................................................... 4-6 4.2.3 Pilot Programs to Eradicate Eurasian Water Milfoil .......................................................................... 4-7 4.3 Noxious and Nuisance Aquatic Plant Monitoring Program ........................................................................... 4-7 4.3.1 Aquatic Plant Monitoring Approach ..................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Big Bear Lake Tmdl Action Plan
    BIG BEAR LAKE TMDL ACTION PLAN Prepared for Big Bear Lake Nutrient TMDL Task Force August 26, 2010 9665 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 201 San Diego, California 92123 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Big Bear Lake TMDL Action Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................................ III LIST OF FIGURES........................................................................................................................................................ V LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................................................... VI LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................................................... VII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Watershed Setting ........................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Big Bear Lake Watershed and Lake Characteristics .................................................................................... 1-5 1.3 Big
    [Show full text]
  • Decisions on Washington Place Names * Admiralty Inlet
    DECISIONS ON WASHINGTON PLACE NAMES * ADMIRALTY INLET. That part of Puget Sound from Strait of Juan de Fuca to the lines: (1) From southernmost point of Double Bluff, Island County, to the northeast point of Foulweather Bluff, Kit­ sap County, Wash. (2) From northwest point of Foulweather Bluff to Tala Point, Jefferson County, Wash. ANNETTE. Lake, at head of Humpback Creek, west of Silver Peak, King County, Wash. BACON. Creek, tributary to Skagit River northeast of Diobsud Creek, Skagit County, Wash. BEDAL. Creek, tributary to South Fork Sauk River, Snohomish County, Wash. (not Bedel). BIG BEAR. Mountain (altitude, 5,612 feet), south of Three Fing­ ers Mountain and north of Windy Pass, Snohomish County, Wash. BLAKELy. 1 Rock, in Puget Sound, 7 miles west from Seattle, Kitsap County, Wash. (Not Blakeley.) BONANZA. Peak (altitude, 9,500 feet), Chelan County, Wash. (Not Mt. Goode nor North Star Mountain.) CHI KAMIN . Peak (elevation, about 7,000 feet), head of Gold Creek, 2 miles east of Huckleberry Mountain, Kittitas County, Wash. CHINOOK. Pass, T. 16 N., R. 10 E., crossing the summit of the Cascade Range, at head of Chinook Creek, Mount Rainier National Park, Pierce and Yakima Counties, Wash. (Not McQuellan.) CLEAR. Creek, rising in Clear Lake and tributary to Sank River, Ts. 31 and 32 N., Rs. 9 and 10, Snohomish County, Wash. ( ot North Fork of Clear.) DEL CAMPO. Peak, head of Weden Creek, Snohomish County, Wash. (Not Flag.) DIOBSUD. Creek, rising near Mount Watson, and tributary to Skagit River from west, Skagit County, Wash. (Not Diabase nor Diosub.) • A bulletin containing the decisions of the United States Geographic Board from July 1, 1916, to July 1, 1918, has appeared.
    [Show full text]
  • SNOW SHOW 2019 STORE LIST January 30-February 1, 2019 | Colorado Convention Center | Denver, CO
    SNOW SHOW 2019 STORE LIST January 30-February 1, 2019 | Colorado Convention Center | Denver, CO This retail store location list details only one unique storefront per city/state and/or city/country that attended Outdoor Retailer Snow Show 2019. ALABAMA THE WOODSMAN CO ......................................................FORT SMITH EV RIDEABLES ..................................................HUNTINGTON BEACH WERNERS TRADING CO ..................................................... CULLMAN WAL-MART .................................................................... BENTONVILLE FABFITFUN ................................................................... LOS ANGELES FAMBRANDS LLC........................................................................ BELL ALASKA CALIFORNIA FAST SKI SPORTS .................................................MAMMOTH LAKES 212TH RESCUE SQUADRON ...................................................... JBER 707 STREET ................................................................. LOS ANGELES FIGS .............................................................................. LOS ANGELES 6TH AVENUE OUTFITTERS ............................................ ANCHORAGE ABRAXAS ...............................................................................EUREKA FIRST CLOTHING ......................................................SAN FRANCISCO ALASKA HELISKIING ..............................................................HAINES ACTION SPORTS ..........................................................BAKERSFIELD FLIP
    [Show full text]
  • Land Management Plan Forest Service
    United States Department of Agriculture Land Management Plan Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region Part 2 San Bernardino National R5-MB-079 Forest Strategy September 2005 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, Write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Land Management Plan Part 2 San Bernardino National Forest Strategy R5-MB-079 September 2005 Table of Contents Tables............................................................................................................................................. vii Document Format Protocols....................................................................................................... viii Land Management Plan Strategy..................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Ornithological Monographs
    ORNITHOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS No. 3. The Birds of Kentucky. R. M. Mengel. 1965. $25.00. ORNITHOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS NO. 54 • SPOTTED OWL POPULATION DYNAMICS • FRANKLIN ET AL. ET DYNAMICS • FRANKLIN POPULATION OWL 54 • SPOTTED NO. MONOGRAPHS ORNITHOLOGICAL Ornithological No. 6. Adaptations for Locomotion and Feeding in the Anhinga and the Double-crested Cormorant. O. T. Owre. 1967. $10.00. No. 7. A Distributional Survey of the Birds of Honduras. B. L. Monroe, Jr. 1968. $25.00. No. 10. The Behavior of Spotted Antbirds. E. O. Willis. 1972. $10.00. No. 11. Behavior, Mimetic Songs and Song Dialects, and Relationships of the Parasitic Indigobirds (Vidua) of Africa. R. B. Payne. 1973. $10.00. Monographs No. 12. Intra-island Variation in the Mascarene White-eye Zosterops borbonica. F. B. Gill. 1973. $10.00. No. 13. Evolutionary Trends in the Neotropical Ovenbirds and Woodhewers. A. Feduccia. 1973. $10.00. No. 54 No. 14. A Symposium on the House Sparrow (Passer domesticus) and European Tree Sparrow (P. montanus) in North America. S. C. Kendeigh, Ed. 1973. $10.00. No. 15. Functional Anatomy and Adaptive Evolution of the Feeding Apparatus in the Hawaiian Honeycreeper Genus Loxops (Drepanididae). L. P. Richards. and W. J. Bock. 1973. $10.00. No. 16. The Red-tailed Tropicbird on Kure Atoll. R. R. Fleet. 1974. $6.00. No. 17. Comparative Behavior of the American Avocet and the Black-necked Stilt (Recurvirostridae). R. B. Hamilton. 1975. $10.00. No. 18. Breeding Biology and Behavior of the Oldsquaw (Clangula hyemalis L.). R. M. Alison. 1975. $6.00. No. 19. Bird Populations of Aspen Forests in Western North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Hit the Slopes with California's Top-Notch
    SPORT_127.qxp_Layout 1 11/22/19 12:51 PM Page 127 2020CALIFORNIAGUIDE Hit the Slopes with California’s Top-Notch Alpine Entertainment Site Inspections WAVE RIDERS of Event-Ready The Golden State’s SPG A Premier Travel Media publication 6 Destinations best surfing spots, revealed www.SportsPlanningGuide.com SPORT_128.qxp_Layout 1 11/16/19 6:08 PM Page 128 Laurie Baker Chief Executive Officer, Redding Visitors Bureau Welcome to the sports world of the Golden State! California has hosted many of the greatest sports events in history, from the Olympics to the Super Bowl. Whether your event takes place in a stadium, on a river, in the mountains or on a beach, California is ready to provide you with the world-class services and experiences you require to achieve success. One in eight Americans lives here, and our industries are active supporters of sports in all forms. California is known for its agricultural companies of the San Joaquin Valley, healthcare industry giants, over 100 major and community colleges and the high-tech firms of Silicon Valley. Our corporate leaders all recognize the value of sport and play to the growth of their communities and companies. They consistently support thousands of organizations and events each year with a multitude of sponsorships. In addition, California cities like Roseville, Redding, Irvine, Morro Bay, Bakersfield and Pomona are actively investing in sports facilities that can accommodate all types of events. The new Placer Valley Sports and Events Center in Roseville will offer 160,000 square feet of space for indoor sports and events. Irvine recently opened the 194-acre Great Park Sports Complex, which is capable of hosting just about any outdoor sport you can imagine, and the Fairplex in Pomona has a long standing reputation for year-round activities.
    [Show full text]
  • BOARD of WATER and POWER COMMISSIONERS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA February 28, 2017 9:00 AM
    BOARD OF WATER AND POWER COMMISSIONERS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA February 28, 2017 9:00 AM CITY OF BIG BEAR LAKE, DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER 41972 GARSTIN DRIVE Service, Quality, Community BIG BEAR LAKE, CALIFORNIA 92315 WWW.BBLDWP.COM BOARD MEMBERS Don Smith, Chair Bob Tarras, Vice-Chair Craig Hjorth, Treasurer Alan Lee, Commissioner Kris Saukel, Commissioner OPEN SESSION CALL MEETING TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PUBLIC FORUM The public may address the Board by completing a speaker card. All remarks shall be addressed to the Board as a body only. There is a three minute maximum time limit when addressing the Board. Please note that California law prohibits the Board from taking action on any item not appearing on the agenda. 1. CONSENT CALENDAR 1.1 Approve Minutes of a Special Board Meeting Dated January 24, 2017 1.2 Resolution No. 2017-XX for 2015 and 2016 Salary Schedules 1.3 Resolution No. 2017-XX for DWP Policy #2017-XX Drug-free and Alcohol-free Workplace ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR 2. DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS 1.1 2.1 Check Register 1/01/2017-1/31/2017 Board to review and consider authenticating the check register for January 2017. 2.2 Financial Analysis – December 31, 2016 Board to review the YTD financial analysis. 2.3 Draft Annual Report - Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Board to review and consider approving the Fiscal Year 2015/2016 Annual Report. 2.4 Resolution No. DWP 2017-XX for USBR Grant Funding Application for Infrastructure Improvements Board to review and consider adopting Resolution No.
    [Show full text]
  • Snow Show 2020 Store List
    OUTDOOR + SNOW SHOW 2020 | STORE LIST JANUARY 29-31, 2020 | COLORADO CONVENTION CENTER | DENVER, CO The below list includes registered buyers that attended Outdoor + Snow Show 2020. ALABAMA SKI HAUS ..........................................................................FLAGSTAFF CLEAN AESTHETIC .....................................................PLAYA DEL REY MOBTOWN MERCH................................................................ MOBILE SKI PRO INC ...............................................................................MESA COLLEGE OUTSIDE ....................................................... CARPINTERIA MOUNTAIN HIGH OUTFITTERS .....................................BIRMINGHAM SNOW MOUNTAIN RIVER INC (SMR) ...............................FLAGSTAFF COMFORT KICKS LA ..................................................SANTA MONICA PANTS STORE ............................................................... LEEDSLEEDS SUNRISE PARK RESORT .........................................................GREER COOZIE OUTDOORS ...................................................SANTA MONICA TRUCK GEAR BY LINE-X .................................................HUNTSVILLE THE HIKE HOUSE .................................................................. SEDONA COSMOTOG .................................................................................BREA WERNERS TRADING CO ..................................................... CULLMAN CURATED ..................................................................SAN FRANCISCO ARKANSAS CUSTOM SKI ESCAPE
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air USA (W7W)
    Summits on the Air U.S.A. (W7W) Association Reference Manual (ARM) Document Reference S39.1 Issue number 2.0 Date of issue 01-Dec-2016 Participation start date 01-July-2009 Authorised Date 08-Jul-2009 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Darryl Holman, WW7D, [email protected] Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Summits on the Air – ARM for USA W7W-Washington Table of contents Change Control ................................................................................................................... 4 Disclaimer ........................................................................................................................... 5 Copyright Notices ............................................................................................................... 5 1.0 Association Reference Data .......................................................................................... 6 2.1 Program Derivation ....................................................................................................... 7 2.2 General Information ...................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Final Access, Activation Zone, and Operating Location Explained ............................. 8 2.4 Rights of Way and Access Issues ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • San Bernardino National Forest Visitor Guide
    San Bernardino National Forest VISITOR GUIDE United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region A free guide to enhance your visit to the National Forest 2013-2014 San Bernardino Welcome to Southern California’s Backyard National Forest Supervisor’s Office The wild lands of the San Bernardino and San Jacinto Mountain Ranges were designated a Na- 602 S. Tippecanoe Ave. tional Forest more than a hundred years ago. The Forest Reserve Act was passed in 1891, giv- San Bernardino, CA 92408 ing the president authority to “set apart and reserve, in any state or territory having public land (909) 382-2600 bearing forests . as public reservations.” San Jacinto Ranger District From this act was born the San P.O. Box 518 Bernardino Forest Reserve, which 54270 Pine Crest Ave. became the San Bernardino Na- Idyllwild, CA 92549 tional Forest in 1907. The San Ber- (909) 382-2921 nardino National Forest as public Front Country Ranger District land was set aside for the conserva- Lytle Creek Ranger Station tion of natural resources such as 1209 Lytle Creek Road trees, water, minerals, livestock Lytle Creek, CA 92358 range, recreation, and wildlife. (909) 382-2851 Originally, the forest was home Mill Creek Work Center to Native Americans, since long 34701 Mill Creek Road before recorded history. Mexican Mentone, CA 92359 (909) 382-2882 and European settlements occurred abbit sporadically for the first half of R Mountaintop Ranger District the 19th century, but the chain of ico Big Bear Discovery Center events that led to the creation of RP P.O. Box 69 the National Forest in 1893 really 40971 North Shore Dr., Hwy 38 began after California became part Fawnskin, CA 92333 of the United States in 1848 (it had (909) 382-2790 Se by Photo been part of Mexico since 1822).
    [Show full text]
  • Teamwork and Place-Based Curriculum and Instruction in Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages
    California State University, San Bernardino CSUSB ScholarWorks Theses Digitization Project John M. Pfau Library 2002 Teamwork and place-based curriculum and instruction in teaching English to speakers of other languages Mary Kay Bider Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project Part of the Bilingual, Multilingual, and Multicultural Education Commons Recommended Citation Bider, Mary Kay, "Teamwork and place-based curriculum and instruction in teaching English to speakers of other languages" (2002). Theses Digitization Project. 2268. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project/2268 This Project is brought to you for free and open access by the John M. Pfau Library at CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses Digitization Project by an authorized administrator of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TEAMWORK AND PLACE-BASED CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION IN TEACHING ENGLISH TO SPEAKERS OF OTHER LANGUAGES A Project Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in Education: Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages by Mary Kay Bider March 2002 TEAMWORK AND PLACE-BASED CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION IN TEACHING ENGLISH TO SPEAKERS OF OTHER LANGUAGES A Project Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino by Mary Kay Bider March 2002 Approved by: ABSTRACT The purpose of this project is to apply the theories , of the educational reformer, John Dewey, to the discipline of English as a Foreign Language (EFL). Dewey's 1 revelations on the importance of experiential learning provide the foundation of the place-based curriculum movement in regular education.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Management Plan Forest Service
    United States Department of Agriculture Land Management Plan Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region Part 3 Design Criteria for the R5-MB-080 Southern California National September 2005 Forests Angeles National Forest Cleveland National Forest Los Padres National Forest San Bernardino National Forest The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, Write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Cover collage contains a photograph by Ken Lubas (lower right), reprinted with permission (copyright, 2005, Los Angeles Times). Land Management Plan Part 3: Design Criteria for Southern California National Forests Angeles National Forest Cleveland National Forest Los Padres National Forest San Bernardino National Forest R5-MB-080
    [Show full text]