Download (2189Kb)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download (2189Kb) A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick Permanent WRAP URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/87345 Copyright and reuse: This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. For more information, please contact the WRAP Team at: [email protected] warwick.ac.uk/lib-publications Towards a Suitable Domestic Arbitration Practice in Nigeria By Ademola Jonathan Bamgbose A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Law University of Warwick School of Law June 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Dedication ..................................................................................................................................... vii Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................... viii Declaration .................................................................................................................................... iix Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... x List of Abbreviations ...................................................................................................................... xi Table of Legislation ...................................................................................................................... xiii Table of Cases .............................................................................................................................. xvii CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 1 1.0 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................... 1 2.0 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM ................................................................................ 3 3.0 OBJECTIVES OF THE RESEARCH ............................................................................... 5 4.0 RESEARCH QUESTIONS ............................................................................................... 6 5.0 THESIS STRUCTURE ...................................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER TWO: THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM IN NIGERIA: THE NEED FOR AN ALTERNATIVE ......................................................................................................................... 10 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 10 1.0 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................. 12 2.0 THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM IN MODERN NIGERIA: Scope and Jurisdiction……..15 2.1. High Court of the State and the FCT ................................................................ 15 2.2. The Federal High Court ..................................................................................... 16 2.3. The National Industrial Court ........................................................................... 17 2.4. Customary and Sharia Courts of Appeal of the FCT and the State ......... …18 2.5. The Court of Appeal ........................................................................................... 18 2.6. The Supreme Court ............................................................................................. 19 3.0 THE NIGERIAN JUDICIARY: A Dysfunctional Institution .................................... 20 3.1. Industrial Strike Actions, Perennial Backlog of Cases and Delay in Proceedings. ................................................................................................................. 24 3.2. Lack of Financial Autonomy and Independence ............................................ 27 3.3. Lack of Modern Infrastructure .......................................................................... 29 3.4. Corrupt and Incompetent Staff ......................................................................... 30 ii 3.5. Unsuitable, Uncertain and/or Outdated Laws ............................................... 35 4.0 A CASE FOR REFORMS: Towards an Efficient Judicial System. ........................... 37 CONCLUDING REMARKS ..................................................................................................... 44 CHAPTER THREE: ARBITRATION: A VIABLE ALTERNATIVE TO LITIGATION ................................................................................................................................................. …..46 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 46 1.0 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................. 49 2.0 MODERN DISPUTE RESOLUTION MECHANISMS .............................................. 53 2.1. A Brief Overview................................................................................................. 53 2.2. Factors That Have Contributed to the Rise of ADR ....................................... 56 3.0 ARBITRATION: THE MOST VIABLE ADR .............................................................. 59 4.0 ABANDONING THE CONCEPT KNOWN AS ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) ................................................................................................................ 64 5.0 ARBITRATION: A VIABLE ALTERNATIVE TO LITIGATION ................................ 70 5.1. Limitations of Litigation ..................................................................................... 70 5.2. How does Arbitration come in? ........................................................................ 73 CONCLUDING REMARKS ..................................................................................................... 85 CHAPTER FOUR: DOMESTIC ARBITRATION IN NIGERIA ...................................... 87 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 87 1.0 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................. 88 1.1. Historical Background to Statutory Arbitration in Nigeria .......................... 88 2.0 DEFINING THE SCOPE OF DOMESTIC ARBITRATION ...................................... 90 2.1. Domestic Arbitration in General ....................................................................... 90 2.2. Nigeria’s Definition of Domestic Arbitration .................................................. 95 3.0 AN INTRODUCTION TO THE DOMESTIC PRACTICE IN NIGERIA ................ 97 3.1. The Agreement to Arbitrate ............................................................................... 98 3.2. The Need for a Dispute .................................................................................... 101 3.3. Starting an Arbitration: The Appointment of an Arbitral Tribunal ........... 104 3.4. The Arbitral Proceedings ................................................................................. 106 3.5. The Decision of the Tribunal: The Award ..................................................... 108 3.6. Enforcement of the Award............................................................................... 111 4.0 PREVIOUS ATTEMPTS AT REFORM ...................................................................... 114 iii 4.1. The 2005 Reform Committee ........................................................................... 114 4.2. The Uniform State Arbitration Law: The Lagos State Arbitration Law 2009 in View. ....................................................................................................................... 117 5.0 A CASE FOR REFORMS ............................................................................................. 120 5.1. The Issue of Writing .......................................................................................... 121 5.2. Court Intervention ............................................................................................ 124 5.3. Constitutionality of Arbitration ...................................................................... 128 5.4. Party Autonomy ................................................................................................ 133 5.5. Stay of Proceedings ........................................................................................... 134 5.6. The Number of Arbitrators .............................................................................. 137 CONCLUDING REMARKS ................................................................................................... 138 CHAPTER FIVE: CUSTOMARY ARBITRATION IN MODERN NIGERIA .............. 139 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 139 1.0 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................... 141 2.0 CUSTOMARY ARBITRATION IN MODERN NIGERIA ...................................... 146 2.1. Initial Controversies Relating to the Existence and Validity of Customary Arbitration. ...............................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • IN the SUPREME COURT of NIGERIA on Wednesday, the 31St Day of December 1969
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA On Wednesday, the 31st Day of December 1969 Before their Lordship Sylvester Umaru Onu ..... Justice Supreme Court Akintola Olufemi Ejiwunmi ..... Justice Supreme Court Dahiru Musdapher ..... Justice Supreme Court Mahmud Mohammed ..... Justice Supreme Court Walter Samuel Nkanu Onnoghen ..... Justice Supreme Court SC208/2000 Between Chief Ugbor Ofia & 3 ors .... Appellant And Chief Isaiah Mba Ejem & 4 ors .... Respondent Judgment of the Court Delivered by Walter Samuel Nkanu Onnoghen. J.S.C. This is an appeal against the judgment of the Port Harcourt Division of the Court of Appeal delivered in appeal No CA/PH/156/94 on the 27th day of January 2000 in which it allowed the appeal of the present Respondents against the judgment of the High Court of Imo State holden at Afikpo in suit No HAF/3/77 delivered by Anyanwu, J. on the 30th day of July 1991 in favour of the Appellants who were Plaintiffs before that Court was set aside. On the 3rd day of February, 1977 the Appellants as Plaintiffs caused a Writ of Summons to be issued against the Respondents who were Defendants claiming the following reliefs: 1. The Plaintiffs claim against the Defendants jointly and severally as follows: - (a) Declaration of title to the piece and portion of land called Nchara Edda situate in Edda within jurisdiction. The annual value is less than ten Naira (N10. 00). (b) N50, 000.00 (Fifty thousand Naira) being general damages for trespass in that the Defendants without the consent and or permission sometime in 1973 broke and entered the Plaintiffs said Nchara Edda and made roads, made foundation for houses, made nursery for palm trees and cut many economic trees including palm trees and timber.
    [Show full text]
  • ICJ Review-31-1983-Eng
    W Sf£R For the Rule o f Law THE REVIEW international commission o f ju r is t s HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE WORLD Argentina 1 Sri Lanka 20 Indonesia 6 Tanzania 26 Lebanon 9 Uruguay 29 South Africa 16 COMMENTARIES ILO Studies on Discrimination in Employment 35 UN Sub-Commission 37 Human Rights Committee 42 European Draft Convention Against Torture 50 ARTICLES The Universal Declaration at 35 Philip Alston 60 Human Rights and the Peace of Nations John P. Humphrey 71 Restructuring Democracy in Turkey Bulent Tanor 75 BASIC TEXT Principles of Medical Ethics 87 No. 31 December 1983 Editor: Niall MacDermot Human Rights in the World Argentina October 30 1983 will be remembered basic human rights and fundamental free­ for ever in Argentine history as the date doms, and the destruction of democratic that heralded the start of the return to a principles and their replacement by others democratic way of life after nearly eight of a repressive and authoritarian nature. years of military government. On that day, The dictatorship’s so-called “military pro­ presidential and legislative elections were cess of national reconstruction” aroused held in Argentina, and took place in a tran­ violent emotions by adopting a “dirty war” quil and orderly atmosphere. A very high strategy, first against subversive groups and percentage of the electorate - apart from later against all opposition, whether legal the tens of thousands of exiles who were or illegal. It was a political repression that unable to vote - went to the polls and cast knew no limits and that constituted a veri­ their vote unmistakably for democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • NIGERIA: Defending Human Rights: Not Everywhere Not Every Right International Fact-Finding Mission Report
    NIGERIA: Defending Human Rights: Not Everywhere Not Every Right International Fact-Finding Mission Report April 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms Introduction 1. Delegation’s composition and objectives 3 2. Methodology 3 3. Acknowledgements 4 Summary of key findings 4 I. Historical, economic, geo-political and institutional background 1. Historical overview 5 2. Nigeria’s historical track of human rights: a difficult environment for human rights defenders 6 II. Nigeria and its international and regional commitments 8 III. Constitutional and legislative framework relevant to human rights activities 1. Freedom of Association 10 2. Freedom of Peaceful Assembly 12 3. Right to a Fair Trial and Effective Remedy 13 4. Freedom of Expression and Freedom of the Media 13 5. Access to Information 15 IV. Domestic oversight mechanisms 1. The National Human Rights Commission 17 2. The Directorate for Citizen’s Rights 18 3. The Human Rights Desks at police stations 19 4. The Police Service Commission and the Public Complaints Commission 19 V. Groups of human rights defenders at particular risk 1. Defenders operating in the Niger Delta 20 2. Defenders working on corruption and good governance 22 3. Media practitioners 23 4. LGBT defenders 23 Source: European Commission website, http://ec.europa.eu/world/where/nigeria/index fr.htm 5. Women Human Rights Defenders 25 6. Trade unions and labour activists 26 VI. Conclusion and Recommendations 28 Annex 1 List of organisations and institutions met during the fact finding mission 32 This report has been produced with the support of the European Union, the International Organisation of the Francophonie and the Republic and Canton of Geneva.
    [Show full text]
  • PROVISIONAL LIST.Pdf
    S/N NAME YEAR OF CALL BRANCH PHONE NO EMAIL 1 JONATHAN FELIX ABA 2 SYLVESTER C. IFEAKOR ABA 3 NSIKAK UTANG IJIOMA ABA 4 ORAKWE OBIANUJU IFEYINWA ABA 5 OGUNJI CHIDOZIE KINGSLEY ABA 6 UCHENNA V. OBODOCHUKWU ABA 7 KEVIN CHUKWUDI NWUFO, SAN ABA 8 NWOGU IFIONU TAGBO ABA 9 ANIAWONWA NJIDEKA LINDA ABA 10 UKOH NDUDIM ISAAC ABA 11 EKENE RICHIE IREMEKA ABA 12 HIPPOLITUS U. UDENSI ABA 13 ABIGAIL C. AGBAI ABA 14 UKPAI OKORIE UKAIRO ABA 15 ONYINYECHI GIFT OGBODO ABA 16 EZINMA UKPAI UKAIRO ABA 17 GRACE UZOME UKEJE ABA 18 AJUGA JOHN ONWUKWE ABA 19 ONUCHUKWU CHARLES NSOBUNDU ABA 20 IREM ENYINNAYA OKERE ABA 21 ONYEKACHI OKWUOSA MUKOSOLU ABA 22 CHINYERE C. UMEOJIAKA ABA 23 OBIORA AKINWUMI OBIANWU, SAN ABA 24 NWAUGO VICTOR CHIMA ABA 25 NWABUIKWU K. MGBEMENA ABA 26 KANU FRANCIS ONYEBUCHI ABA 27 MARK ISRAEL CHIJIOKE ABA 28 EMEKA E. AGWULONU ABA 29 TREASURE E. N. UDO ABA 30 JULIET N. UDECHUKWU ABA 31 AWA CHUKWU IKECHUKWU ABA 32 CHIMUANYA V. OKWANDU ABA 33 CHIBUEZE OWUALAH ABA 34 AMANZE LINUS ALOMA ABA 35 CHINONSO ONONUJU ABA 36 MABEL OGONNAYA EZE ABA 37 BOB CHIEDOZIE OGU ABA 38 DANDY CHIMAOBI NWOKONNA ABA 39 JOHN IFEANYICHUKWU KALU ABA 40 UGOCHUKWU UKIWE ABA 41 FELIX EGBULE AGBARIRI, SAN ABA 42 OMENIHU CHINWEUBA ABA 43 IGNATIUS O. NWOKO ABA 44 ICHIE MATTHEW EKEOMA ABA 45 ICHIE CORDELIA CHINWENDU ABA 46 NNAMDI G. NWABEKE ABA 47 NNAOCHIE ADAOBI ANANSO ABA 48 OGOJIAKU RUFUS UMUNNA ABA 49 EPHRAIM CHINEDU DURU ABA 50 UGONWANYI S. AHAIWE ABA 51 EMMANUEL E.
    [Show full text]
  • International Law in the Nigerian Legal System Christian N
    Golden Gate University School of Law GGU Law Digital Commons Publications Faculty Scholarship Spring 1997 International Law in the Nigerian Legal System Christian N. Okeke Golden Gate University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/pubs Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation 27 Cal. W. Int'l. L. J. 311 (1997) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at GGU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications by an authorized administrator of GGU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE NIGERIAN LEGAL SYSTEM CHRISTIAN N. OKEKE· Table ofContents INTRODUCTION 312 ARGUMENT OF THE PAPER 312 DEFINITIONS 317 I. UNITED NATIONS DECADE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 321 II. HISTORICAL OUTLINE 323 A. Nigeria and Pre-Colonial International Law 323 B. Nigeria and "Colonial" International Law 326 C. The Place ofInternational Law in the Nigerian Constitutional Development 328 III. GENERAL DISPOSITION TOWARD INTERNATIONAL LAW AND THE ESTABLISHED RULES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 330 IV. THE PLACE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW IN NIGERIAN MUNICIPAL LAW 335 V. NIGERIA'S TREATY-MAKING PRACTICE , 337 VI. ApPLICABLE LAW IN SELECTED QUESTIONS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 339 A. International Human Rights and Nigerian Law 339 B. The Attitude ofthe Nigerian Courts to the Decrees and Edicts Derogating from Human Rights ............ 341 c. Implementation ofInternational Human Rights Treaties to Which Nigeria is a Party 342 D. Aliens Law .................................. 344 E. Extradition .................................. 348 F. Extradition and Human Rights 350 VII.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Panel of the National Judicial Council Holden at Abuja
    IN THE PANEL OF THE NATIONAL JUDICIAL COUNCIL HOLDEN AT ABUJA IN THE PETITIONS OF ALLEGED FINANCIAL IMPROPRIETY, INFIDELITY TO THE CONSTITUION AND OTHER ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL CRIMES RELATED LAWS BY THE ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL CRIMES COMMISSION AGAINST HON. JUSTICE WALTER SAMUEL NKANU ONNOGHEN, GCON WRITTEN ADDRESS SUBMITTED BY THE COUNSEL TO THE RESPONDENT Respondent’s Counsel R.A. Lawal-Rabana, SAN Okon Nkanu Efut, SAN J.U.K. Igwe, SAN George Ibrahim,Esq Victoria Agi, Esq Orji Ude Ekumankama, Esq Opeyemi Origunloye, Esq Temitayo Fiki, Esq For Service On Counsel For the Petitioner Economic and Financial Crimes Commission Rotimi Oyedepo, Esq [email protected] 1 IN THE PANEL OF THE NATIONAL JUDICIAL COUNCIL HOLDEN AT ABUJA IN THE PETITIONS OF ALLEGED FINANCIAL IMPROPRIETY, INFIDELITY TO THE CONSTITUION AND OTHER ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL CRIMES RELATED LAWS BY THE ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL CRIMES COMMISSION AGAINST HON. JUSTICE WALTER SAMUEL NKANU ONNOGHEN, GCON 1.0 Introduction 1.1 The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission sent two (2) petitions to the Chairman, National Judicial Council through the office of the Chief Justice of Nigeria against The Hon. Justice Walter Samuel Nkanu Onnoghen, GCON, Chief Justice of Nigeria. 1.2 The first petition is dated 4th February, 2019 vide reference EFCC/EC/GC/31/2253 while the second petition is dated 5th March 2019 vide reference EFCC/EC/CJN/05/59. 1.3 The petition was forwarded to the Hon. Chief Justice of Nigeria by the National Judicial Council vide a memo dated 11th February 2019 reference NJC/F1/SC.3/1/570 following the 17th Emergency meeting of the Council held the same 11th February 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Nigerian Banking Law Reports [1997]
    NIGERIAN BANKING LAW REPORTS [1997] VOLUME 7 (PART II) To be cited as: [1997] 7 N.B.L.R. (PART II) Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation 2009 Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation Plot 447/448 Airport Road Central Business District P.M.B. 284, Garki Abuja, Federal Capital Territory [FCT] Nigeria Tel: +23495237715-6, +523696740-44 Members of the LexisNexis Group worldwide South Africa LexisNexis DURBAN 215 North Ridge Road, Morningside, 4001 JOHANNESBURG First Floor, 25 Fredman Drive, Sandton, 2196 CAPE TOWN Ground Floor, Waterford House, 2 Ring Road, Century City, 7441 www.lexisnexis.co.za Australia LexisNexis, CHATSWOOD, New South Wales Austria LexisNexis Verlag ARD Orac GmbH & Co KG, VIENNA Benelux LexisNexis Benelux, AMSTERDAM China LexisNexis, BEIJING Canada LexisNexis Butterworths, MARKHAM, Ontario France LexisNexis SA, PARIS Germany LexisNexis Germany, MÜNSTER Hong Kong LexisNexis, HONG KONG Hungary HVG-Orac, BUDAPEST India LexisNexis Butterworths Wadhwa Nagpur, NEW DELHI Ireland Butterworths (Ireland) Ltd, DUBLIN Italy Giuffrè Editore, MILAN Japan LexisNexis, TOKYO Korea LexisNexis, SEOUL Malaysia LexisNexis, KUALA LUMPUR New Zealand LexisNexis, WELLINGTON Poland LexisNexis Poland, WARSAW Singapore LexisNexis, SINGAPORE United Kingdom LexisNexis Butterworths, LONDON USA LexisNexis, DAYTON, Ohio © 2009 Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation, published by LexisNexis (Pty) Ltd under licence ISSN 1595-1030 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including electronic, mechanical, photocopying and recording, without the written permission of the copyright holder, application for which should be addressed to the publisher. Such written permission must also be obtained before any part of this publication is stored in a retrieval system of any nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation at the Nigerian Bar Association Annual General Conference, Abuja 2015 on Current Developments in Judicial Reforms in Nigeria
    PRESENTATION AT THE NIGERIAN BAR ASSOCIATION ANNUAL GENERAL CONFERENCE, ABUJA 2015 ON CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS IN JUDICIAL REFORMS IN NIGERIA Introduction The words of the then Speaker of the Nigerian House of Representatives, Rt. Hon. Aminu Waziri Tambuwal at the public hearing of the bill for the enactment of the administration of Criminal Justice Bill vividly captures the need for continuous judicial reform of any nation. According to him “….human society is dynamic; the system of administration of justice cannot be static but must be improved to create more effective and efficient mechanisms, procedures and institutions for dealing with the new realities and challenges in the society. This is because it is impossible to have a sound economy without a solid foundation of good laws that can curb anti-social behaviours and other disruptive tendencies. As we develop plans and strategies for the economic and other forms of reforms, we also need to develop plans and programmes for creating sound laws and procedural systems consistent with our commitment to our legislative agenda.” One cannot but agree with the above submission as a sound economy is the surest engine of growth and the shortest route to tackling the challenges that confronts any given society. No nation, therefore, can boast to have achieved the best of reform in its judicial system at any given time without putting measures in place that allow for the continuous reform of its justice sector in line with the changes inherent in human society which also translates to changes in the economy. The role of law in promoting economic development cannot be underscored because most of human lives and interaction with each other are regulated by law.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Phd Onafuwa.Pdf
    SOCIO-LEGAL BARRIERS TO THE EXPANSION OF LEGAL AID IN NIGERIA: INITIATING LEGAL REFORM THROUGH THE CUSTOMARY COURT SYSTEM OLÚBÙNMI EUNICE ỌNÀFUWÀ Doctor of Philosophy School of Business and Law UNIVERSITY OF EAST LONDON July 2020 i Abstract The core of this study is directed towards an analysis of the laws, rules and guidelines that embody legal aid provision in present day Nigeria. This study will employ a socio-legal approach to investigate the root causes of Nigeria’s limited legal aid scheme. It will also focus on the relationship between law and society and will employ appropriate empirical research methods for an in-depth understanding of significant causal factors that influence legal aid provision in Nigeria. These factors will include an examination of Nigerian legal institutions, legal processes, and legal behaviour,1 particularly how legal institutions and legal processes affect individuals and how they are perceived by ordinary citizens and potential recipients of legal aid. This research considers the potential for other sources of law, and other legal institutions, such as customary legal systems, to be used as an additional, credible way to access, develop and expand legal aid provision in Nigeria. This study adopts two qualitative techniques: semi-structured telephone interviews and self- administered questionnaires, which were completed and returned via email. The request for respondents was launched on social media. In total, fifteen respondents partook in the study: twelve via self-administered questionnaires and three via telephone interviews. The inquiry was focused on a people’s perspective, the respondents were a variety of ages above 18, and evenly distributed by gender.
    [Show full text]
  • Egba Indigenes in the Politics and Political Development of Nigeria
    Greener Journal of Social Sciences ISSN: 2276-7800 Vol. 2 (1), pp. 009-018, February 2012. Research Article Egba Indigenes in the Politics and Political Development of Nigeria. *K. A. Aderogba, B. A Ogunyemi and Dapo Odukoya Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Tai Solarin University of Education, Ijebu-Ode, Nigeria. *Corresponding Author’s Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT Egba indigenes have been very prominent in political history of Nigeria. The objective of the paper is to examine the political development of Nigeria and the roles played by Egba indigenes. Abeokuta founded in 1830 has been a notable settlement in Nigeria. The Egbas have been significant members of ruling political parties. They have contributed significantly to the political development of Nigeria. The likes of Adetokunbo Ademola, the Ransome Kuti family, Madam Tinubu, George Sodeinde Sowemimo, Wole Soyinka, Moshood Kashimawo Abiola, Olusegun Aremu Obasanjo, Olusegun Osoba, Dimeji Bankole and others cannot be forgotten in the political history and political development of Nigerian. The researchers listened to a number of radio and television documentary programmes. News paper cuttings, magazines and journals were read. The paper used oral interview conducted with some retired and active political party chieftains, the monarchs, and notable members of Nigerian public. Providence has bestowed it upon them to play active parts in the political affairs of Nigeria. Not even a single ethnic group has ever had it so good and in the political history and development of the country. However, whoever is in power needs to be supported and encouraged to move the nation ahead . Key Words: Egba indigenes, politics, political development, Nigeria.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ORIGIN of the NAME NIGERIA Nigeria As Country
    THE ORIGIN OF THE NAME NIGERIA Help our youth the truth to know Nigeria as country is located in West In love and Honesty to grow Africa between latitude 40 – 140 North of the And living just and true equator and longitude 30 – 140 East of the Greenwich meridian. Great lofty heights attain The name Nigeria was given by the Miss To build a nation where peace Flora Shaw in 1898 who later married Fredrick Lord Lugard who amalgamated the Northern And justice shall reign and Southern Protectorates of Nigeria in the NYSC ANTHEM year 1914 and died in 1945. Youth obey the Clarion call The official language is English and the Nation’s motto is UNITY AND FAITH, PEACE AND Let us lift our Nation high PROGRESS. Under the sun or in the rain NATIONAL ANTHEM With dedication, and selflessness Arise, O Compatriots, Nigeria’s call obey Nigeria is ours, Nigeria we serve. To serve our fatherland NIGERIA COAT OF ARMS With love and strength and faith Representation of Components The labour of our hero’s past - The Black Shield represents the good Shall never be in vain soil of Nigeria - The Eagle represents the Strength of To serve with heart and Might Nigeria One nation bound in freedom, - The Two Horses stands for dignity and pride Peace and unity. - The Y represent River Niger and River Benue. THE PLEDGE THE NIGERIAN FLAG I Pledge to Nigeria my Country The Nigeria flag has two colours To be faithful loyal and honest (Green and White) To serve Nigeria with all my strength - The Green part represents Agriculture To defend her unity - The White represents Unity and Peace.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Brocheur Cover Pages
    ICI JUD AL I L N A S T N I O T I U T T A E N M ABUJA ce ot n to lle : K xce Nationalnowledge for E Judicial Institute Mohammed Bello Centre, Abuja. 2015 BROCHURE OF CONTINUING JUDICIAL EDUCATION Theme: PROMOTING JUDICIAL ETHICS IN NIGERIA Hon. Justice Mahmud Mohammed, GCON Chief Justice of Nigeria and Chairman Board of Governors of the National Judicial Institute 1 2 Mallam Abubakar Umar Maidama Institute Secretary 3 Outer & Inside View of the Andrews Otutu Obaseki Auditorium of the Institute used for Continuing Judicial Education Programmes such as All Nigeria Judges’ Conferences, Seminars, summits Etc. 4 Participants at a Continuing Judicial Education Programme. 5 Outer and Inner view of the Seminar and Study Rooms used for Case Studies, Simulations and group Exercises during Continuing Judicial Education Programmes 6 A Case Study and Simulation Session at a Workshop in one of the Institute’s Seminar and Workshop Halls 7 Outer view of the Banquet Hall Used for Tea / Coffee Breaks and Refreshments During Continuing Judicial Education Programmes of the Institute. 8 TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages 1. 2015 Calendar of Judicial Education Programmes---- 7 2. Foreword------------------------------------------------------11-12 3. Purpose of the Brochure----------------------------------- 8 Who can use the Brochure--------------------------------- 8 4. How to use the Brochure----------------------------------- 8-9 5. Introduction-------------------------------------------------- 10 6. Establishment of the National Judicial Institute-------10-13 7. Mission Statement------------------------------------------ 14 8. Role of the Institute in the Administration of Justice- 14-15 9. Checklist for Developing our Programmes---------------15-18 10. Development of Judicial education Programmes-------18-22 11.
    [Show full text]