Roger Williams University Law Review Volume 16 Issue 1 Symposium: Methodological Approaches to Article 1 Comparative Law Winter 2011 African Law in Comparative Law: Does Comparativism Have Worth? Chris Nwachukwu Okeke Golden Gate University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: http://docs.rwu.edu/rwu_LR Recommended Citation Okeke, Chris Nwachukwu (2011) "African Law in Comparative Law: Does Comparativism Have Worth?," Roger Williams University Law Review: Vol. 16: Iss. 1, Article 1. Available at: http://docs.rwu.edu/rwu_LR/vol16/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at DOCS@RWU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Roger Williams University Law Review by an authorized administrator of DOCS@RWU. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Articles and Responses African Law in Comparative Law: Does Comparativism Have Worth? Chris Nwachukwu Okeke*** I. INTRODUCTION: African law is one of the most understudied and under- utilized legal systems in the world today.1 In contrast with the scholarship and study of South Asian law, there is hardly any concerted scholarship on African law that is undertaken with deliberate purpose by either individual African scholars or institutions. 2 In discussing African law within the context of Comparative Law, several crucial questions must be clarified. For * Professor of Law, Director, LL.M. & S.J.D. Programs in International Legal Studies, and Director, The Sompong Sucharitkul Center for Advanced International Legal Studies, Golden Gate University School of Law, San Francisco, California. I am indebted to Edward Eberle, Emeka Duruigbo, and Ruth Astle, for their helpful comments.