DOCSLIB.ORG

Purification and Culture of Spinal Motor Neurons

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Purification and Culture of Spinal Motor Neurons Downloaded from http://cshprotocols.cshlp.org/ on September 28, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Topic Introduction Purification and Culture of Spinal Motor Neurons David J. Graber1 and Brent T. Harris2,3 1 2 Dartmouth Medical School, Department of Pathology, Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756; Georgetown University Medical Center, Departments of Neurology and Pathology, Washington, D.C. 20057 Motor neurons are responsible for voluntary movement. Lower motor neurons are characterized by large soma, the potential to form very long axons, and wide-ranging dendritic arborization. They receive direction from various neuronal cell types and induce movement of skeletal muscle fibers through acetylcholine release at the neuromuscular junction. Each lower motor neuron can commu- nicate with 10 to several hundred muscle fibers at firing rates modulated by the balance of ongoing neurotransmitter signaling. Disease and trauma that affect lower motor neurons can cause paralysis and, in some cases, death. Studies using primary cultures of these cells have ongoing potential to facilitate a deeper understanding of their biology and function. MOTOR NEURON CHARACTERISTICS Motor neurons arise from the ventral portion of the neural tube and are among the first cells born in the spinal cord (Altman and Bayer 1984). A large proportion of these cells undergo apoptosis during postnatal development (Yamamoto and Henderson 1999). Lower motor neurons are located in the ventral horn (anterior horn in human), throughout the spinal cord, and in brain-stem nuclei. They induce voluntary movement via acetylcholine release at the neuromuscular junction on skeletal muscle fibers. Each muscle fiber is supplied by a single axon terminal, and a single motor neuron can form synapses with as few as ten or as many as several hundred muscle fibers. Direction for voluntary movement is received from neurons in supraspinal regions (predominantly the primary motor cortex), interneurons, sensory neurons, and even other lower motor neurons. The sum of ongoing inhibitory (i.e., GABA) and excitatory (i.e., glutamate) signals determines the motor neuron’s firing rate and resultant muscle-fiber contraction (Carp and Wolpaw 2001). The soma of motor neurons is typically two to three times larger than that of most other neurons. In addition to their large soma size, lower motor neurons can have an axon that extends very long distances. A motor axon arising from the lumbar spinal cord with its target muscle in the foot can reach a length of up to 1 m in humans. Paradoxically, the majority of the cell surface area is in its uniquely wide-ranging dendritic arborization (Carp and Wolpaw 2001). DISEASE AND TRAUMA OF LOWER MOTOR NEURONS Dysfunction or degeneration of lower motor neurons can result in debilitating and even lethal paral- ysis. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Kennedy’s disease, progressive muscular atrophy, and spinal 3Correspondence: [email protected] © 2013 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Cite this article as Cold Spring Harb Protoc; 2013; doi:10.1101/pdb.top070920 310 Downloaded from http://cshprotocols.cshlp.org/ on September 28, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Purification and Culture of Spinal Motor Neurons muscular atrophy are examples of hereditary and/or idiopathic diseases involving the degeneration of lower motor neurons. Myasthenia gravis is an example of an autoimmune disease involving autoan- tibodies directed most commonly against acetylcholine receptors, which disrupts neurotransmission at the neuromuscular junction. Trauma to motor neurons induced by spinal cord injury, radiculop- athy, or peripheral nerve injury can be transient or permanent depending on the severity and location of tissue crush or transection. SPINAL MOTOR NEURONS IN CULTURE Culturing of lower motor neurons is an important, albeit simplified, system for studying fundamental cellular and molecular neurobiological questions that may shed light on neurological diseases involv- ing motor neurons. Cultures may be studied pure or nearly so, or mixed with other cells (distinctly purified or mixed), depending on the experimental paradigm. Such cultures have been used to study glial–neuronal interactions (Ullian et al. 2004), synaptogenesis (Ullian et al. 2004), axonal transport (Stommel et al. 2007), mitochondrial movement (Stommel et al. 2007), neurotrophin function (Hanson et al. 1998), and neuronal degeneration/apoptosis/necrosis (Hanson et al. 1998) by a handful of laboratories. The accompanying protocol, Purification and Culture of Spinal Motor Neurons from Rat Embryos (Graber and Harris 2013), was derived from a methodology first reported by Camu and Henderson (1992) and later modified only slightly by Ben Barres’ and our laboratories. It takes advantage of several distinct properties of rat lower motor neurons to isolate them away from their neighboring cells. First, an ideal stage in development after motor neurons are born (embryonic day 14 during rat gestation), but prior to extensive axonal extension or developmental apoptosis, is exploited (Yamamoto and Henderson 1999; Sendtner et al. 2000). Lower motor neurons cannot be viably isolated using this method after birth. After dissociating embryonic spinal cord tissue, which contains lower motor neurons among many other cell types, cells are separated based on cell density because motor neurons are uniquely large. Finally, this collected cell population is further purified based on selective immunopanning for motor neurons, which express the low-affinity nerve growth factor receptor often referred to as p75 (Yan and Johnson 1988). The near-pure lower motor neuron cultures are plated and seeded in defined conditions optimal for survival. These cultured motor neurons are rounded when initially plated to the growth substrate, and then project an elaborate array of axons and dendrites within five days. REFERENCES Altman J, Bayer SA. 1984. The development of the rat spinal cord. Adv Anat Sendtner M, Pei G, Beck M, Schweizer U, Wiese S. 2000. Developmental mo- Embryol Cell Biol 85: 1–164. toneuron cell death and neurotrophic factors. Cell Tissue Res 301: 71–84. Camu W, Henderson CE. 1992. Purification of embryonic rat motoneurons Stommel EW, van Hoff RM, Graber DJ, Bercury KK, Langford GM, Harris by panning on a monoclonal antibody to the low-affinity NGF receptor. BT. 2007. Tumor necrosis factor-α induces changes in mitochondrial J Neurosci Methods 44: 59–70. cellular distribution in motor neurons. Neuroscience 146: 1013–1019. Carp JS, Wolpaw JR. 2001. Motor neurons and spinal control of movement. Ullian EM, Harris BT, Wu A, Chan JR, Barres BA. 2004. Schwann cells Encyclopedia of life sciences. Wiley, Chichester, United Kingdom. and astrocytes induce synapse formation by spinal motor neurons in Graber DJ. Harris BT. 2013. Purification and culture of spinal motor culture. Mol Cell Neurosci 25: 241–251. neurons from rat embryos. Cold Spring Harb Protoc doi: 10.1101/pdb. Yamamoto Y, Henderson CE. 1999. Patterns of programmed cell death in prot074161. populations of developing spinal motoneurons in chicken, mouse, and Hanson MG Jr, Shen S, Wiemelt AP, McMorris FA, Barres BA. 1998. Cyclic rat. Dev Biol 214: 60–71. AMP elevation is sufficient to promote the survival of spinal motor Yan Q, Johnson EM Jr. 1988. An immunohistochemical study of the nerve neurons in vitro. J Neurosci 18: 7361–7371. growth factor receptor in developing rats. J Neurosci 8: 3481–3498. Cite this article as Cold Spring Harb Protoc; 2013; doi:10.1101/pdb.top070920 311 Downloaded from http://cshprotocols.cshlp.org/ on September 28, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Purification and Culture of Spinal Motor Neurons David J. Graber and Brent T. Harris Cold Spring Harb Protoc; doi: 10.1101/pdb.top070920 Email Alerting Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article - click here. Service Subject Browse articles on similar topics from Cold Spring Harbor Protocols. Categories Neural Cell Culture (56 articles) Neuroscience, general (312 articles) To subscribe to Cold Spring Harbor Protocols go to: http://cshprotocols.cshlp.org/subscriptions © 2013 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ALS and Other Motor Neuron Diseases Can Represent Diagnostic Challenges
    Review Article Address correspondence to Dr Ezgi Tiryaki, Hennepin ALS and Other Motor County Medical Center, Department of Neurology, 701 Park Avenue P5-200, Neuron Diseases Minneapolis, MN 55415, [email protected]. Ezgi Tiryaki, MD; Holli A. Horak, MD, FAAN Relationship Disclosure: Dr Tiryaki’s institution receives support from The ALS Association. Dr Horak’s ABSTRACT institution receives a grant from the Centers for Disease Purpose of Review: This review describes the most common motor neuron disease, Control and Prevention. ALS. It discusses the diagnosis and evaluation of ALS and the current understanding of its Unlabeled Use of pathophysiology, including new genetic underpinnings of the disease. This article also Products/Investigational covers other motor neuron diseases, reviews how to distinguish them from ALS, and Use Disclosure: Drs Tiryaki and Horak discuss discusses their pathophysiology. the unlabeled use of various Recent Findings: In this article, the spectrum of cognitive involvement in ALS, new concepts drugs for the symptomatic about protein synthesis pathology in the etiology of ALS, and new genetic associations will be management of ALS. * 2014, American Academy covered. This concept has changed over the past 3 to 4 years with the discovery of new of Neurology. genes and genetic processes that may trigger the disease. As of 2014, two-thirds of familial ALS and 10% of sporadic ALS can be explained by genetics. TAR DNA binding protein 43 kDa (TDP-43), for instance, has been shown to cause frontotemporal dementia as well as some cases of familial ALS, and is associated with frontotemporal dysfunction in ALS. Summary: The anterior horn cells control all voluntary movement: motor activity, res- piratory, speech, and swallowing functions are dependent upon signals from the anterior horn cells.
    [Show full text]
  • A System for Studying Mechanisms of Neuromuscular Junction Development and Maintenance Valérie Vilmont1,‡, Bruno Cadot1, Gilles Ouanounou2 and Edgar R
    © 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Development (2016) 143, 2464-2477 doi:10.1242/dev.130278 TECHNIQUES AND RESOURCES RESEARCH ARTICLE A system for studying mechanisms of neuromuscular junction development and maintenance Valérie Vilmont1,‡, Bruno Cadot1, Gilles Ouanounou2 and Edgar R. Gomes1,3,*,‡ ABSTRACT different animal models and cell lines (Chen et al., 2014; Corti et al., The neuromuscular junction (NMJ), a cellular synapse between a 2012; Lenzi et al., 2015) with the hope of recapitulating some motor neuron and a skeletal muscle fiber, enables the translation of features of neuromuscular diseases and understanding the triggers chemical cues into physical activity. The development of this special of one of their common hallmarks: the disruption of the structure has been subject to numerous investigations, but its neuromuscular junction (NMJ). The NMJ is one of the most complexity renders in vivo studies particularly difficult to perform. studied synapses. It is formed of three key elements: the lower motor In vitro modeling of the neuromuscular junction represents a powerful neuron (the pre-synaptic compartment), the skeletal muscle (the tool to delineate fully the fine tuning of events that lead to subcellular post-synaptic compartment) and the Schwann cell (Sanes and specialization at the pre-synaptic and post-synaptic sites. Here, we Lichtman, 1999). The NMJ is formed in a step-wise manner describe a novel heterologous co-culture in vitro method using rat following a series of cues involving these three cellular components spinal cord explants with dorsal root ganglia and murine primary and its role is basically to ensure the skeletal muscle functionality.
    [Show full text]
  • Cranial Nerves 1, 5, 7-12
    Cranial Nerve I Olfactory Nerve Nerve fiber modality: Special sensory afferent Cranial Nerves 1, 5, 7-12 Function: Olfaction Remarkable features: – Peripheral processes act as sensory receptors (the other special sensory nerves have separate Warren L Felton III, MD receptors) Professor and Associate Chair of Clinical – Primary afferent neurons undergo continuous Activities, Department of Neurology replacement throughout life Associate Professor of Ophthalmology – Primary afferent neurons synapse with secondary neurons in the olfactory bulb without synapsing Chair, Division of Neuro-Ophthalmology first in the thalamus (as do all other sensory VCU School of Medicine neurons) – Pathways to cortical areas are entirely ipsilateral 1 2 Crania Nerve I Cranial Nerve I Clinical Testing Pathology Anosmia, hyposmia: loss of or impaired Frequently overlooked in neurologic olfaction examination – 1% of population, 50% of population >60 years Aromatic stimulus placed under each – Note: patients with bilateral anosmia often report nostril with the other nostril occluded, eg impaired taste (ageusia, hypogeusia), though coffee, cloves, or soap taste is normal when tested Note that noxious stimuli such as Dysosmia: disordered olfaction ammonia are not used due to concomitant – Parosmia: distorted olfaction stimulation of CN V – Olfactory hallucination: presence of perceived odor in the absence of odor Quantitative clinical tests are available: • Aura preceding complex partial seizures of eg, University of Pennsylvania Smell temporal lobe origin
    [Show full text]
  • Cortex Brainstem Spinal Cord Thalamus Cerebellum Basal Ganglia
    Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology HST.131: Introduction to Neuroscience Course Director: Dr. David Corey Motor Systems I 1 Emad Eskandar, MD Motor Systems I - Muscles & Spinal Cord Introduction Normal motor function requires the coordination of multiple inter-elated areas of the CNS. Understanding the contributions of these areas to generating movements and the disturbances that arise from their pathology are important challenges for the clinician and the scientist. Despite the importance of diseases that cause disorders of movement, the precise function of many of these areas is not completely clear. The main constituents of the motor system are the cortex, basal ganglia, cerebellum, brainstem, and spinal cord. Cortex Basal Ganglia Cerebellum Thalamus Brainstem Spinal Cord In very broad terms, cortical motor areas initiate voluntary movements. The cortex projects to the spinal cord directly, through the corticospinal tract - also known as the pyramidal tract, or indirectly through relay areas in the brain stem. The cortical output is modified by two parallel but separate re­ entrant side loops. One loop involves the basal ganglia while the other loop involves the cerebellum. The final outputs for the entire system are the alpha motor neurons of the spinal cord, also called the Lower Motor Neurons. Cortex: Planning and initiation of voluntary movements and integration of inputs from other brain areas. Basal Ganglia: Enforcement of desired movements and suppression of undesired movements. Cerebellum: Timing and precision of fine movements, adjusting ongoing movements, motor learning of skilled tasks Brain Stem: Control of balance and posture, coordination of head, neck and eye movements, motor outflow of cranial nerves Spinal Cord: Spontaneous reflexes, rhythmic movements, motor outflow to body.
    [Show full text]
  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)
    Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) There are multiple motor neuron diseases. Each has its own defining features and many characteristics that are shared by all of them: Degenerative disease of the nervous system Progressive despite treatments and therapies Begins quietly after a period of normal nervous system function ALS is the most common motor neuron disease. One of its defining features is that it is a motor neuron disease that affects both upper and lower motor neurons. Anatomical Involvement ALS is a disease that causes muscle atrophy in the muscles of the extremities, trunk, mouth and face. In some instances mood and memory function are also affected. The disease operates by attacking the motor neurons located in the central nervous system which direct voluntary muscle function. The impulses that control the muscle function originate with the upper motor neurons in the brain and continue along efferent (descending) CNS pathways through the brainstem into the spinal cord. The disease does not affect the sensory or autonomic system because ALS affects only the motor systems. ALS is a disease of both upper and lower motor neurons and is diagnosed in part through the use of NCS/EMG which evaluates lower motor neuron function. All motor neurons are upper motor neurons so long as they are encased in the brain or spinal cord. Once the neuron exits the spinal cord, it operates as a lower motor neuron. 1 Upper Motor Neurons The upper motor neurons are derived from corticospinal and corticobulbar fibers that originate in the brain’s primary motor cortex. They are responsible for carrying impulses for voluntary motor activity from the cerebral cortex to the lower motor neurons.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Motor Neuron Syndrome
    982 Journal ofNeurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1993;56:982-987 Motor conduction block and high titres of anti- J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.56.9.982 on 1 September 1993. Downloaded from GM1 ganglioside antibodies: pathological evidence of a motor neuropathy in a patient with lower motor neuron syndrome David Adams, Thierry Kuntzer, Andreas J Steck, Alexander Lobrinus, Robert C Janzer, Franco Regli Abstract and temporal dispersion included a more A patient with a progressive lower motor than 20% reduction in the negative CMAP neuron syndrome had neurophysiologi- amplitude and an increase in the negative cal evidence of motor axon loss, multi- duration of no more than 15% of the maxi- focal proximal motor nerve conduction mum CMAP elicited by stimulation at the block, and high titres of anti-ganglioside proximal site compared with that evoked by GM1 antibodies. Neuropathological find- distal stimulation.12 In cases where stimula- ings included a predominantly proximal tion could not be applied proximally, a con- motor radiculoneuropathy with multi- duction block was admitted when the number focal IgG and IgM deposits on nerve of motor unit potentials evoked by graded fibres associated with a loss of spinal stimulation was much greater than could be motor neurons. These findings support obtained during maximal voluntary contrac- an autoimmune origin of this lower tion or when the total area of the CMAP was motor neuron syndrome with retrograde greater than the sum of the areas of the indi- degeneration of spinal motor neurons vidual motor unit potentials."3 Motor nerve and severe neurogenic muscular atrophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper and Lower Motor Neuron Lesions in the Upper Extremity Muscles of Tetraplegics1
    Paraplegia (1976), 14, II 5-121 UPPER AND LOWER MOTOR NEURON LESIONS IN THE UPPER EXTREMITY MUSCLES OF TETRAPLEGICS1 By P. H. PECKHAM, J. T. MORTIMER and E. B. MARSOLAIS* Engineering Design Center and Department of Biomedical Engineering, *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44[06 VIABILITY of the lower motor neuron is imperative if paralysed muscles are to be electrically activated for functional use. Recently, functional use of the hand has been obtained through excitation of paralysed forearm muscles (Peckham et al., 1973; Mortimer & Peckham, 1973). These advantages were achieved with subjects whose stimulated muscles had little or no involvement of the peripheral nerve, i.e. an upper motor neuron lesion. In general, however, one could expect some involvement of the lower motor neuron to be present because trauma resulting from the spinal cord injury often extends one or more segments rostral and caudal to the site of damage (Guttmann, 1973) and may involve the cell bodies of peripheral nerves which exit the spinal cord near the level of injury or the spinal nerves themselves (Haymaker, 1953). The present study was designed to investigate the muscles of a small popula­ tion of high level spinal cord injury patients in order to determine those that potentially could be used for functional electrical stimulation. Specifically, the objective of this study was to evaluate the nature of the muscle innervation of the forearm and hand muscles of quadriplegic patients. Methods Subjects. These studies were carried out on 24 tetraplegic patients. The post-injury period ranged from 3 months to 18 years, most being tested less than I year post-injury.
    [Show full text]
  • Cauda Equina Or Mower Motor Neurone Injuries
    Queensland Spinal Cord Fact Sheet Injuries Service Cauda Equina or Lower Motor Neuron Injuries SPINAL INJURIES UNIT Ph: 3176 2215 This fact sheet provides general information on some of the changes someone may experience Fax: 3176 5061 as a result of having a Lower Motor Neuron Injury. Please note there is additional information provided via hyperlinks throughout this document. These links will redirect to the Queensland OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT Spinal Cord Injuries Service (QSCIS) website. Ph: 3176 2641 Fax: 3176 5644 Basic Definition of a Lower Motor Neuron (LMN) Injury A lower motor neuron (LMN) injury can result from a Postal and Location cauda equina injury or conus injury. In the lumbar region Princess Alexandra Hospital Ipswich Rd of the spine, there is a spray of spinal nerve roots called Woolloongabba QLD 4102 the cauda equina. Cauda equina in Latin means the AUSTRALIA horse’s tail. A conus injury is a similar injury but is higher up in the TRANSITIONAL cord around L1 or L2 level at the level of the conus of the REHABILITATION PROGRAM cord. This injury may be seen as a mixed presentation of Ph: 3176 9508 an upper motor neuron (UMN) and LMN injury. (See Fax: 3176 9514 picture opposite) Email [email protected] The LMN lesion presents with flaccid or no tone and minimal or nil reflexes (floppy). Other nerve roots in the Postal PO Box 6053 lumbar region can also be damaged. Buranda, QLD, 4102 What happens as a result of the injury? Location A LMN injury is accompanied by a range of symptoms, rd 3 Floor, Buranda Village the severity of which depend on how badly the nerve roots are damaged and which ones are Cnr Cornwall St & Ipswich Rd Buranda, QLD, 4102 damaged.
    [Show full text]
  • Reduction of Lower Motor Neuron Degeneration in Wobbler Mice by N-Acetyl-L-Cysteine
    The Journal of Neuroscience, December 1, 1996, 16(23):7574–7582 Reduction of Lower Motor Neuron Degeneration in wobbler Mice by N-Acetyl-L-Cysteine Jeffrey T. Henderson, Mohammed Javaheri, Susan Kopko, and John C. Roder Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Program in Development and Fetal Health, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X5 The murine mutant wobbler is a model of lower motoneuron loss and elevated glutathione peroxidase levels within the cer- degeneration with associated skeletal muscle atrophy. This vical spinal cord, (2) increased axon caliber in the medial facial mutation most closely resembles Werdnig–Hofmann disease in nerve, (3) increased muscle mass and muscle fiber area in the humans and shares some of the clinical features of amyotro- triceps and flexor carpi ulnaris muscles, and (4) increased phic lateral sclerosis (ALS). It has been suggested that reactive functional efficiency of the forelimbs, as compared with un- oxygen species (ROS) may play a role in the pathogenesis of treated wobbler littermates. These data suggest that reactive disorders such as ALS. To examine the relationship between oxygen species may be involved in the degeneration of motor ROS and neural degeneration, we have studied the effects of neurons in wobbler mice and demonstrate that oral adminis- agents such as N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC), which reduce free tration of NAC effectively reduces the degree of motor degen- radical damage. Litters of wobbler mice were given a 1% eration in wobbler mice. This treatment thus may be applicable solution of the glutathione precursor NAC in their drinking water in the treatment of other lower motor neuropathies.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper and Lower Motor Neuron Lesions
    UPPER AND LOWER MOTOR NEURON LESIONS Prof. Syed Shahid Habib MBBS DSDM FCPS Professor & Consultant Clinical Neurophysiology Dept. of Physiology King Saud University OBJECTIVES At the end of this lecture you should be able to Describe the functional anatomy of upper and lower motor neurons Describe and differentiate the features of upper and lower motor neuron lesions Explain features of Brown Sequard Syndrome Correlate the site of lesion with pattern of loss of sensations Describe facial, bulbar and pseudobulbar palsy 31 segments Embryological development growth of cord lags behind mature spinal cord ends at L1 Upper cervical cord lesions produce quadriplegia and weakness of the diaphragm Lesions at C4-C5 produce quadriplegia COMAPRISON BETWEEN UPPER & LOWER MOTOR NEURON LESIONS UMN LESION LMN LESION • Paralysis affect • Individual muscle or group movements of muscles are affected. • Wasting not pronounced. • Wasting pronounced. • Spasticity Muscles • Flaccidity. Muscles hypertonic (Clasp Knife). hypotonic. • Tendon reflexes • Tendon reflexes diminished increased. or absent. • Superficial reflexes NCV- abnormal diminished Denervation potentials in • Babinski’s sign +ve, EMG (fibrillations) NCV- normal • Muscle contractures No denervation potentials • Trophic changes in skin in EMG and nails COMAPRISON BETWEEN UPPER & LOWER MOTOR NEURON LESIONS Characteristic of upper Characteristics of lower motor neurone lesions: motor neurone lesions: • no wasting; • wasting; • Loss of skilled • fasciculation (tapping produce it) finger/toe movements
    [Show full text]
  • Approach to Patients with Neuromuscular Disorders
    Approach to Patients With Neuromuscular Disorders Anthony A. Amato, MD Chief, Neuromuscular Division and Director, Clinical Neurophysiology Laboratory Brigham and Women’s Hospital Associate Professor of Neurology Harvard Medical School Boston, Massachusetts INTRODUCTION a true sensory level is not evident in GBS but should be present in transverse myelitis and other structural abnormalities involving the The approach to patients with neuromuscular disorders is chal- spinal cord. lenging. As in other neurological diseases the key to arriving at the correct diagnosis is careful localization of the lesion. Weakness can The presence of motor and sensory symptoms and signs are helpful be the result of central lesions (brain or spinal cord processes—e.g., in distinguishing peripheral neuropathies from anterior horn cell brainstem infarct, central pontine myelinolysis, transverse myelopa- disorders, myopathies, and neuromuscular junction disorders. thy), anterior horn cell disease (e.g., amyotrophic lateral sclerosis However, some types of peripheral neuropathy are predominantly [ALS], poliomyelitis), peripheral neuropathy (e.g., Guillain-Barré or purely motor and thus can be difficult to distinguish these other syndrome [GBS]), neuromuscular junction defects (botulism, disease processes. Most neuropathies are associated with distal Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome [LEMS], myasthenia gravis greater than proximal weakness. However, significant proximal [MG]), or myopathic disorders. The most important aspect of as- weakness can be seen in certain peripheral neuropathies (e.g., GBS, sessing individuals with neuromuscular disorders is taking a thor- chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy [CIDP]). ough history of the patient’s symptoms, disease progression, and Further, although usually associated with proximal weakness, past medical and family history as well as performing a detailed certain myopathies and rarely even neuromuscular junction disor- neurologic examination.
    [Show full text]
  • (Dr. Merchut) 1. Lower Motor Neuron Patterns of Weakness Patients May
    Weakness (Dr. Merchut) 1. Lower motor neuron patterns of weakness Patients may have lower motor neuron (LMN) signs (more focal weakness and prominent muscle atrophy, decreased muscle stretch reflexes and tone, and fasciculations) from lesions occurring anywhere along the length of spinal cord or brain stem lower motor neurons. Involvement of a single peripheral nerve leads to LMN signs as well as sensory impairment confined to its anatomical territory, which may be accompanied by painful paresthesia or dysesthesia. In most cases of peripheral neuropathy or polyneuropathy, multiple nerve involvement manifests as distal limb LMN signs and sensory ("stocking and glove") loss, typically beginning in the lower limbs. A lesion of the brachial or lumbosacral plexus causes LMN signs and sensory deficit according to the anatomical territory of the trunk, division or cord of the plexus involved. A radiculopathy usually involves neck or back pain which may radiate into a limb or the trunk in a dermatomal distribution, along which tingling or numbness may also occur. LMN signs occur in muscles innervated by the involved spinal nerve root. Anterior horn cell lesions may cause weakness in a distal or proximal segment of a limb, eventually becoming more widespread and bilateral with prominent fasciculations in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). ALS may also affect the brain stem lower motor neurons involved with speaking, chewing or swallowing. In general, pain may often accompany lesions of roots, plexus or nerves, but not lesions of anterior horn cells. 2. Upper motor neuron patterns of weakness Often patients have upper motor neuron (UMN) signs (more diffuse weakness with relatively less muscle atrophy, hyper-reflexia, spasticity, and Babinski signs) in the limbs on one side of the body described as hemiparesis or hemiplegia.
    [Show full text]