DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Impact Assessment Yanchep Rail Extension: Part 2 - Eglinton Station to Yanchep Station

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Impact Assessment Yanchep Rail Extension: Part 2 - Eglinton Station to Yanchep Station Report 24 AUGUST 2018 Environmental impact assessment Yanchep rail extension: Part 2 - Eglinton station to Yanchep station EEL17088.001 | Environmental impact assessment | Yanchep rail extension: Part 2 - Eglinton Page i station to Yanchep station | 24 August 2018 Report Document status Version Purpose of document Authored by Reviewed by Review date Draft A Draft for client review GilGla SteRol 28.02.18 Draft B Draft for client review GilGla/SalPic SteRol/JohHal 17.07.18 Draft C Draft for client review GilGla/SalPic SteRol 06.08.18 Rev 0 Final for issue GilGla SteRol 21.08.18 Approval for issue Name Signature Date S. Rolls 24.08.18 This report was prepared by RPS Australia West Pty Ltd (‘RPS’) within the terms of its engagement and in direct response to a scope of services. This report is strictly limited to the purpose and the facts and matters stated in it and does not apply directly or indirectly and must not be used for any other application, purpose, use or matter. In preparing the report, RPS may have relied upon information provided to it at the time by other parties. RPS accepts no responsibility as to the accuracy or completeness of information provided by those parties at the time of preparing the report. The report does not take into account any changes in information that may have occurred since the publication of the report. If the information relied upon is subsequently determined to be false, inaccurate or incomplete then it is possible that the observations and conclusions expressed in the report may have changed. RPS does not warrant the contents of this report and shall not assume any responsibility or liability for loss whatsoever to any third party caused by, related to or arising out of any use or reliance on the report howsoever. No part of this report, its attachments or appendices may be reproduced by any process without the written consent of RPS. All enquiries should be directed to RPS. Prepared by: RPS AUSTRALIA WEST PTY LTD Prepared for: PUBLIC TRANSPORT Level 2, 27-31 Troode Street AUTHORITY West Perth, WA 6005 Public Transport Centre Australia West Parade PO Box 170, West Perth WA 6872 PERTH WA 6000 T: +61 8 9211 1111 T: +61 8 9326 2000 E: [email protected] E: [email protected] W: pta.wa.gov.au Author: Giles Glasson and Sally Pickard Reviewed: Steve Rolls Approved: Steve Rolls No.: EEL17088.001 Version: Rev 0 Date: 24 August 2018 EEL17088.001 | Environmental impact assessment | Yanchep rail extension: Part 2 - Eglinton Page ii station to Yanchep station | 24 August 2018 Report Contents ASSUMPTIONS AND CAVEATS ...................................................................................................................... 1 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1.1 Purpose of the report........................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Background and context .................................................................................................................. 3 1.2.1 Previous and future planning considerations ...................................................................................... 3 1.3 Overview of the proposal ................................................................................................................. 6 1.4 Community engagement and stakeholder consultation ............................................................... 6 1.5 Summary of potential impacts, proposed mitigation and outcomes .......................................... 7 1.5.1 Key conclusions .................................................................................................................................. 8 2 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 15 2.1 Project staging ................................................................................................................................ 15 2.1.1 Staging rationale ............................................................................................................................... 15 2.2 Purpose and scope of this document ........................................................................................... 16 2.2.1 Purpose of this document ................................................................................................................. 16 2.2.2 Scope of this document ..................................................................................................................... 16 2.2.3 Structure of this document ................................................................................................................ 16 2.3 Proponents details .......................................................................................................................... 16 2.4 Environmental impact assessment process ................................................................................ 16 2.4.1 Environmental Protection Act 1986 ................................................................................................... 16 2.4.2 Other state legislation, regulation and approval ................................................................................ 17 2.4.3 Zoning and land use .......................................................................................................................... 20 2.5 Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 ............................................ 20 2.5.1 Previous EPBC act assessment ....................................................................................................... 21 2.5.2 Accredited assessment context ........................................................................................................ 21 3 PTA PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE ....................................................................................................... 22 3.1 SWMR environmental factors ........................................................................................................ 23 3.2 SWMR environmental Initiatives .................................................................................................... 26 4 THE PROPOSAL .............................................................................................................................. 28 4.1 Background ..................................................................................................................................... 28 4.1.1 Local structure planning .................................................................................................................... 33 4.2 Justification ..................................................................................................................................... 33 4.2.1 Rapid population growth ................................................................................................................... 34 4.2.2 Highly congested traffic network ....................................................................................................... 34 4.2.3 Sustainability outcomes .................................................................................................................... 34 4.2.4 Alignment options .............................................................................................................................. 34 4.3 Proposal description....................................................................................................................... 35 4.4 Local and regional context ............................................................................................................. 37 4.4.1 Development envelope existing land uses ........................................................................................ 37 4.4.2 Surrounding land uses ...................................................................................................................... 37 4.4.3 North-west sub-regional planning framework area ........................................................................... 40 EEL17088.001 | Environmental impact assessment | Yanchep rail extension: Part 2 - Eglinton Page iii station to Yanchep station | 24 August 2018 Report 4.4.4 Swan coastal plain subregion ........................................................................................................... 41 4.5 Proposal delivery ............................................................................................................................ 42 5 STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION ................................................................................................. 43 5.1 Key stakeholders ............................................................................................................................. 43 5.2 Stakeholder engagement process ................................................................................................. 44 5.3 Stakeholder consultation ............................................................................................................... 44 5.3.1 Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions ................................................................. 44 5.3.2 Chairman
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Yanchep Rail Extension Part 2.Pdf
    Report and recommendations of the Environmental Protection Authority Yanchep Rail Extension Part 2 - Eglinton to Yanchep Public Transport Authority Report 1656 November 2019 Yanchep Rail Extension Part 2 – Eglinton to Yanchep Environmental impact assessment process timelines Date Progress stages Time (weeks) 12/09/2018 EPA decides to assess – level of assessment set 18/10/2018 EPA approved Environmental Scoping Document 6 22/05/2019 EPA accepted Environmental Review Document 31 27/05/2019 Environmental Review Document released for public 5 days review 08/07/2019 Public review period for Environmental Review Document 6 closed 15/10/2019 EPA accepted Proponent Response to Submissions 10 24/10/2019 EPA completed its assessment 2 20/11/2019 EPA provided report to the Minister for Environment 4 25/11/2019 EPA report published 3 days 09/12/2019 Close of appeals period 2 Timelines for an assessment may vary according to the complexity of the proposal and are usually agreed with the proponent soon after the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) decides to assess the proposal and records the level of assessment. In this case, the EPA met its timeline objective to complete its assessment and provide a report to the Minister. Dr Tom Hatton Chairman 18 November 2019 ISSN 1836-0483 (Print) ISSN 1836-0491 (Online) Assessment No. 2174 Environmental Protection Authority Yanchep Rail Extension Part 2 – Eglinton to Yanchep Executive Summary The Yanchep Rail Extension: Part 2 – Eglinton to Yanchep Proposal (the proposal) was referred to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) by the proponent, the Public Transport Authority, on 25 August 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Joondalup Local Emergency Management Arrangements
    City of Joondalup Local Emergency Management Arrangements Including the Local Recovery Handbook and Local Recovery Plan Version 1 PUBLIC VERSION joondalup.wa.gov.au 1 City of Joondalup Local Emergency Management Arrangements Local Emergency Management Arrangements These arrangements have been produced and issued under the authority of S. 41(1) of the Emergency Management Act 2005, endorsed by the Wanneroo - Joondalup Local Emergency Management Committee and the Council of the City of Joondalup. The Arrangements have been tabled for noting with the North Metropolitan District Emergency Management Committee and State Emergency Management Committee. The City of Joondalup Local Emergency Management Arrangements has been structured in three (3) distinct parts (including annexures); • The Local Emergency Management Arrangements (the whole document), • The Local Recovery Handbook, and • The City of Joondalup Local Recovery Plan. The purpose is to provide the overarching legislative requirements (the Local Emergency Management Arrangements), the legislative context for recovery (the Local Recovery Handbook) and an operational guide for the recovery phase of an emergency (the Local Recovery Plan). ____________________________________________________________________ __________________________________ Chair Date Wanneroo – Joondalup Local Emergency Management Committee ____________________________________________________________________ __________________________________ Endorsed by City of Joondalup Date City of Joondalup Local Emergency Management
    [Show full text]
  • 2011-12 Budget Paper 1 Budget Speech
    Speech by Hon Christian Porter MLA Treasurer; Attorney General Thursday 19 May 2011 Mr Speaker, I move that this Bill be read a second time. INTRODUCTION Mr Speaker, the Liberal-National Government’s third budget is framed in the context of a growing Western Australian economy, but also in an environment that remains uncertain globally, and contends with uneven levels of economic activity domestically. Mr Speaker, this is a budget about fundamental choices. In preparing the 2011-12 State Budget, the Western Australian Government faced one immense structural challenge, and, in the face of that challenge, had to make a central and pivotal decision about the best approach now – for the future of our State’s economy. The problem is the rapid and massive decline in Western Australia’s share of GST grants. In short, Western Australia’s prime source of revenue for building the State’s future, our mining royalties, is being effectively transferred out of Western Australia by the Commonwealth through the Commonwealth Grants Commission (CGC), in an unprecedented way. The pivotal decision has been whether, in the face of a collapse in GST revenue over coming years, do we as a State Government wind-back our infrastructure investment program, or do we stay the course and continue to invest in the critical social and economic infrastructure that we require to prosper and continue growing. This budget will make real changes in people’s lives by transforming Western Australia through the delivery of major social infrastructure, and also by providing better services to benefit all Western Australians. Mr Speaker today I am proud to announce a $442million surplus in the 2011-12 State Budget.
    [Show full text]
  • West Leederville Activity Centre Plan West Leederville Activity Centre Plan
    West Leederville Activity Centre Plan West Leederville Activity Centre Plan 2 Contents Executive Summary 5 Access, Movement and Parking 52 APPENDIX 1 83 Introduction 6 Access, Movement and Parking Planning Principles 52 Community and Stakeholder Consultation 83 Transit Oriented Development (TOD) 52 Business Survey 83 PART ONE: Centre Overview & Analysis 9 Achieving a High Degree of Public Transport Part 1 - Planning Scenarios for Change 83 Centre Context 10 Connectivity 53 Part 2 - Detailed Planning 83 Movement 12 Promoting Cycling and Walking 54 Car Parking Supply and Management 55 APPENDIX 2 84 Activity 20 Street Design 55 Council Decisions 84 Urban Form 23 Public Domain 61 23 June 2009 84 Services 29 Public Domain Planning Principles 61 25 May 2010 84 Public spaces 61 21 December 2010 84 PART TWO: Planning Scenarios 31 Landscaping 61 Planning Scenarios 33 Sustainability 61 APPENDIX 3 85 Scenario 1 – Modest Change 34 Sustainability Planning Principles 61 Glossary of Terms 85 Scenario 2 – Targeted Change 36 Detailed Planning for each Node 62 Scenario 3 – Significant Change (‘Blue Sky’) 38 Cambridge ‘High Street’ Node 63 Comparison of the Three Scenarios 40 Southport Street Node 66 Community Node 69 PART THREE: The Plan 41 Leederville Station Link 71 Preferred Scenario 43 Kerr Street to Abbotsford Street Residential Area 76 Land Use & Activity 47 Land Use Planning Principles 47 PART FOUR: Implementation 79 Future Land Use 47 Implementation 80 Residential Dwellings 49 Implementation Schedule 80 Retail Needs Assessment - Collaboration 81
    [Show full text]
  • Yanchep Rail Extension Part 2 Public Transport Authority of Western Australia
    Yanchep Rail Extension Part 2 Public Transport Authority of Western Australia Carbon and Energy Assessment Report PTA_METRONET_YRE Part 2 Carbon and Energy Assessment Report | 1 14 May 2019 PTA Contract 180505 Carbon and Energy Ass essment R eport Public Tr ans port Authority of Western Austr alia Carbon and Energy Assessment Report Yanchep Rail Extension Part 2 Project No: IW194200 Document Title: Carbon and Energy Assessment Report Document No.: PTA_METRONET_YRE Part 2 Carbon and Energy Assessment Report Revision: 1 Date: 14 May 2019 Client Name: Public Transport Authority of Western Australia Client No: PTA Contract 180505 Project Manager: Lara Mist Author: Susan Regan File Name: IW194200 YRE Part 2 Carbon and Energy Assessment Report_Rev1.docx Jacobs Australia Pty Limited 11th Floor, Durack Centre 263 Adelaide Terrace PO Box H615 Perth WA 6001 Australia T +61 8 9469 4400 F +61 8 9469 4488 www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2019 Jacobs Australia Pty Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party. Document history and status Revision Date Description By Review Approved A 30/04/2019 Draft for internal review SR JM JM B 01/05/2019 Draft for Project Director review SR DM DM 0 3/5/2019 Issue for client review SR DM DM 1 14/5/2019 Final for client issue JM DM DM PTA_METRONET_YRE Part 2 Carbon and Energy Assessment Report i Carbon and Energy Assessment Report Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012-13 Budget Paper No. 3
    2012-13 Budget Economic and Fiscal Outlook Budget Paper No. 3 Presented to the Legislative Assembly on 17 May 2012 2012-13 BUDGET ECONOMIC AND FISCAL OUTLOOK Budget Paper No. 3 PRESENTED TO THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY ON 17 MAY 2012 2012-13 Economic and Fiscal Outlook © Government of Western Australia Excerpts from this publication may be reproduced, with appropriate acknowledgement, as permitted under the Copyright Act. For further information please contact: Department of Treasury Locked Bag 11 Cloisters Square WA 6850 Telephone: +61 8 6551 2777 Facsimile: +61 8 6551 2500 Email: [email protected] Website: http://ourstatebudget.wa.gov.au Published May 2012 John A. Strijk, Government Printer ISSN 1448–2630 2012-13 BUDGET ECONOMIC AND FISCAL OUTLOOK TABLE OF CONTENTS Page UNDER TREASURER’S CERTIFICATION ....................................................................... i CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW..................................................................................................... 1 Economic and Revenue Outlook .............................................................................................. 3 Fiscal Outlook............................................................................................................................ 5 Budget Objectives...................................................................................................................... 8 Leadership................................................................................................................................ 8
    [Show full text]
  • Extract from Hansard [COUNCIL — Wednesday, 11 May 2016] P2669c-2683A Hon Ken Travers; Hon James Chown; Hon Lynn Maclaren
    Extract from Hansard [COUNCIL — Wednesday, 11 May 2016] p2669c-2683a Hon Ken Travers; Hon James Chown; Hon Lynn MacLaren “PUBLIC TRANSPORT FOR PERTH IN 2031” Motion HON KEN TRAVERS (North Metropolitan) [1.36 pm]: I move — (1) That the Council note that — (a) the Liberal–National government released in July 2011 a “Draft for Consultation” of their plan “Public Transport for Perth in 2031”; (b) the draft plan proposed two transformational projects by 2020 — (i) the fast-tracking of the northern suburbs railway extension to Yanchep; and (ii) construction of a central northern corridor/Curtin/UWA light rail; (c) the draft plan identified that the following infrastructure was required in the next five to 10 years — (i) a new rail station at Karnup (near Paganoni Road); and (ii) upgrades to Canning Bridge and Stirling Stations; (d) the draft plan proposed a number of on-road bus rapid transit projects be built by 2020, commencing with a bus rapid transit system between Ellenbrook and Bassendean and across to Morley. (2) That the Council calls on the government to — (a) explain why it has taken two years to release the final version of this plan; (b) outline whether it is still committed to the projects and the timelines outlined in the draft plan; and (c) provide detailed reasons, including passenger modelling, for any changes it has made to priority projects or their timing. Interestingly, notice of this motion was given some three years ago to try to find out what had happened to the government’s public transport plan that had then been sitting around and not finalised for two years.
    [Show full text]
  • Cycle Wanneroo City of Wanneroo
    Cycle Wanneroo City of Wanneroo Wanneroo Bike Plan | 0 7 July 2015 Wanner oo Bi ke Plan City of Wanner oo Wanneroo Bike Plan Cycle Wanneroo Project no: IW041400 Document title: Wanneroo Bike Plan Document No.: Revision: 0 Date: 7 July 2015 Client name: City of Wanneroo Client no: Client Reference Project manager: Project Manager Author: Claire Ashburn / Kevan Weaver/ Emmerson Richardson File name: I:\PBIF\Projects\IW041400\Deliverables\Reports\Draft Plan\Cycle Wanneroo V11.docx Jacobs Australia Pty Limited 11th Floor, Durack Centre 263 Adelaide Terrace PO Box H615 Perth WA 6001 Australia T +61 8 9469 4400 F +61 8 9469 4488 www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2015 Jacobs Australia Pty Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This report has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ Client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the Client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this report by any third party. Document history and status Revision Date Description By Review Approved A 8th May 2015 First Draft – Outline structure & Working compilation KW B 26 May 2015 Draft Version 2 – Including Client Comments KW C 3 June 2015 Steering Group Additions KW 0 7 July 2015 Final Report KW ER KW i Wanneroo Bike Plan Contents Foreword from Major of Wanneroo .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Yanchep Rail Extension Part 2 2020 Annual Compliance Assessment.Pdf
    DIVISION OR LOGO Yanchep Rail Extension Part 2: Eglinton to Yanchep Annual Compliance Report EPBC 2018/8262 Reporting Period: 25 May 2020 – 31 December 2020 For more information contact Public Transport Authority Public Transport Centre, West Parade, Perth WA 6000 PO Box 8125, Perth Business Centre, Perth WA 6849 Telephone: (08) 9326 2000 Email: [email protected] www.pta.wa.gov.au Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 3 1.1. Approval under the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 .... 3 1.2. Purpose of this Report ...................................................................................................... 3 2. Compliance ............................................................................................................................ 5 Attachment A – Clearing within Banksia Woodlands of the Swan Coastal Plain Threatened Ecological Community ............................................................................................................... 11 Attachment B – Clearing within foraging habitat including potential breeding trees ............ 13 Attachment C – Clearing within Chuditch potential habitat ..................................................... 15 Attachment D - Indirect Impacts Environmental Management Plan Audit ............................. 17 Attachment E – Construction Environmental Management Plan Audit .................................. 19 Attachment
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Impact Assessment
    TRANSPORT IMPACT ASSESSMENT Project: Sunningdale Primary School Client: EIW Architects Author: Anthony Anastas Version: 0 Document # 1905002-TIA-001 CONSULTING CIVIL AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERS 1 ST. FLOOR, 908 ALBANY HIGHWAY, EAST VICTORIA PARK WA 6101. PHONE|+61 8 9355 1300 FACSIMILE| +61 8 9355 1922 EMAIL| admin@ shawmac.com.au Document Status Version Prepared By Reviewed By Approved By Date 1 Anthony Anastas Paul Nguyen Paul Nguyen 10/07/19 File Reference: Y:\Jobs Active 2019\T&T - Traffic & Parking\EIW_Sunningdale Primary School_1905002\Report\EIW Sunningdale Primary School TIA.docx i | P a g e Contents 1. Introduction and Background ....................................................................................................... 1 2. Proposed Development ................................................................................................................ 2 2.1. Student Numbers ................................................................................................................................... 2 2.2. Car Parking and Access Arrangement ................................................................................................... 2 3. The Site and Surrounding Road Network ..................................................................................... 4 3.1. Site Location and Land Use ................................................................................................................... 4 3.2. Road Network .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • P7428b-7447A Ms Katie Hodson-Thomas
    Extract from Hansard [ASSEMBLY - Wednesday, 27 October 2004] p7428b-7447a Ms Katie Hodson-Thomas; Acting Speaker; Mr Matt Birney; Mrs Cheryl Edwardes; Mr David Templeman; Mr Paul Omodei; Ms Alannah MacTiernan; Speaker; Mr Tony McRae WESTERN AUSTRALIA’S TRANSPORT SYSTEM Motion MS K. HODSON-THOMAS (Carine) [4.28 pm]: I move - That this House condemns the Gallop Labor Government for its failure to properly maintain and expand Western Australia’s transport system. I will raise a number of matters that relate particularly to transport issues. Over the past few weeks I have been in constant receipt of e-mails from a user of the northern suburbs railway line. He is a regular user of the Joondalup railway line into the city. He catches the train from the Glendalough station. It has been interesting reading his e-mails outlining the problems he has encountered on the Joondalup line. I will refer to some of those e-mails today. Recently the new railcar sets arrived in the northern suburbs and the Clarkson station opened. Propaganda on the Mitchell Freeway states “They’re called train passengers” and “Tomorrow, catch the train”. The chap to whom I have referred catches the train regularly. He has been very good. I understand that he has worked with the Public Transport Authority and that he has been in contact with the minister’s office and me. I commend the employee from the PTA who has been corresponding with the commuter to try to rectify some of the matters that the commuter has raised in e-mails to the PTA and to me.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Planning Strategy
    LOCAL PLANNING STRATEGY 1 CONTENTS Executive Summary 3 Local Planning Strategy Map 4 Part 1 Introduction 5-6 Background to the City of Joondalup Purpose of the LPS Community consultation Part 2 State and Regional Planning Context 7-13 Part 3 Local Government Policy Context 15-16 Part 4 Municipal Profile and Key Issues 17-53 Population and Housing Economy and Employment Retail and Commerce Transport Tourism Community Facilities Public Utilities and Services Recreation and Open Space Physical Features and Environment Heritage and Conservation Urban Design Rural Land Part 5 Strategic Planning Themes 54 Part 6 Strategies and Actions 55-64 Joondalup City Centre Housing Commercial Centres Transport Employment Heritage Public Open Space Environment Part 7 Implementation and Review 68-69 Implementation Next steps Review Appendices 70-95 Issues Papers 1 - 7 Analysis of community feedback from Issues Papers surveys 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Joondalup (draft) Local Planning Strategy has been prepared in accordance with the City’s statutory requirements under the Planning and Development Act 2005. The purpose of the Local Planning Strategy is to enable Council and the community to determine the vision and strategic planning direction for the City of Joondalup for the next fifteen to twenty years. Preparation of the Local Planning Strategy has included assessment of all relevant state, regional and council plans, policies and strategies. Community input into the strategy has been achieved through surveys on key planning issues. The Local Planning Strategy has been arranged into 6 main parts: 1. An introduction which provides the background to the development of the Local Planning Strategy 2.
    [Show full text]