DOCSLIB.ORG

FIRST SECTION CASE of MUSHEGH SAGHATELYAN V

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FIRST SECTION CASE of MUSHEGH SAGHATELYAN V FIRST SECTION CASE OF MUSHEGH SAGHATELYAN v. ARMENIA (Application no. 23086/08) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 20 September 2018 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. MUSHEGH SAGHATELYAN v. ARMENIA JUDGMENT 1 In the case of Mushegh Saghatelyan v. Armenia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, President, Kristina Pardalos, Aleš Pejchal, Ksenija Turković, Pauliine Koskelo, Tim Eicke, judges, Siranush Sahakyan, ad hoc judge, and Abel Campos, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 28 August 2018, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in an application (no. 23086/08) against the Republic of Armenia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Armenian national, Mr Mushegh Saghatelyan (“the applicant”), on 22 April 2008. 2. The applicant was represented by Mr V. Grigoryan and Mrs S. Safaryan, lawyers practising in Yerevan. The Armenian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr G. Kostanyan, Representative of the Republic of Armenia to the European Court of Human Rights. 3. The applicant alleged, in particular, that he had been ill-treated at the time of his apprehension and after his arrival at the police station, that the authorities had failed to carry out an effective investigation into his allegations of ill-treatment, that his arrest had been unlawful and arbitrary on various grounds, that he had not been informed promptly of the reasons for his arrest, that his arrest and continued detention had not been based on a reasonable suspicion or relevant and sufficient reasons, that the trial had been unfair since the entire criminal case against him had been based solely on police testimony and the principle of equality of arms and his right to call witnesses had been breached, and that the dispersal of the demonstrators and his subsequent prosecution and conviction had violated his right to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly. 4. On 30 November 2010 the application was communicated to the Government. 5. Mr Armen Harutyunyan, the judge elected in respect of Armenia, was unable to sit in the case (Rule 28 of the Rules of Court). Accordingly, the 2 MUSHEGH SAGHATELYAN v. ARMENIA JUDGMENT President of the Chamber decided to appoint Mrs Siranush Sahakyan to sit as an ad hoc judge (Rule 29 § 1(a)). THE FACTS I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 6. The applicant was born in 1950 and lives in Yerevan. A. The 19 February 2008 presidential election and the post-election events 1. The presidential election and the demonstrations held between 20 February and 1 March 2008 7. On 19 February 2008 a presidential election was held in Armenia. The main contenders were the then Prime Minister, Mr Sargsyan, representing the ruling party, and the main opposition candidate, Mr Ter-Petrosyan, who had also served as President of Armenia between 1991 and 1998. 8. The applicant, who had occupied the post of Head of the Penitentiary Department at the Ministry of the Interior during Mr Ter-Petrosyan’s presidency, was an active supporter of his candidacy. 9. Immediately after the announcement of the preliminary results of the election, Mr Ter-Petrosyan called on his supporters to gather at Freedom Square in central Yerevan (also known as Opera Square) in order to protest against the irregularities which had allegedly occurred in the election process, announcing that the election had not been free and fair. From 20 February 2008 onwards, nationwide daily protest rallies were held by Mr Ter-Petrosyan’s supporters, their main meeting place being Freedom Square and the surrounding park. It appears that the rallies at Freedom Square, held during the daytime and late into the night, attracted at times tens of thousands of people, while several hundred demonstrators stayed in that area around the clock, having set up a camp. It further appears that the applicant was an active participant in the rallies and was often on the podium, and had made a speech on the first day of the rallies. 10. On 24 February 2008 the Central Election Commission announced that Mr Sargsyan had won the election with around 52% of all votes cast, while Mr Ter-Petrosyan received around 21% of votes. 11. On 29 February 2008 the rallies were still in full swing. That night the applicant camped at Freedom Square. MUSHEGH SAGHATELYAN v. ARMENIA JUDGMENT 3 2. The early morning police operation on 1 March 2008 and institution of criminal case no. 62202508 12. The applicant alleged that on 1 March 2008 at around 6 a.m. the police had arrived at Freedom Square. The several hundred demonstrators who were camping there were mostly still asleep, although some of them were awake, having been informed in advance about the arrival of a large number of police officers. In total about 800 heavily armed police officers appeared. The police cordon started approaching the tents and panic broke out among the demonstrators who started waking the others up. Some of the demonstrators managed to switch on the microphones and the lights on the square. Mr Ter-Petrosyan, who was also at the square, addressed the demonstrators: “We see that police forces have arrived at the square. Please, do not have any contact with them and do not touch them in any way. Please keep your distance from them. Let us wait and see what they want from us. If they have something to tell us, we are ready to listen. Please, be patient and peaceful”. Then there was silence for about a minute. By then the police forces had already encircled the square with a triple cordon. Suddenly, without any prior warning or orders to disperse, the police forces, shouting loudly, attacked the demonstrators, most of whom were still asleep in their tents, violently beating them with rubber batons and destroying the camp. Mr Ter-Petrosyan was immediately arrested and taken away. Within a few minutes no demonstrator remained at the square, since everybody, including the applicant, had tried to save themselves by fleeing. He and other activists were then pursued by the police through the streets and arrested (see paragraph 25 below). 13. The Government contested the applicant’s allegations and claimed that the reason for the police operation of 1 March 2008 at Freedom Square had been information obtained on 29 February 2008 by the Armenian Police and National Security Service, according to which a large number of weapons, including metal rods, wooden clubs, firearms, grenades and explosives, were to be distributed to the protesters to incite provocative actions and mass disorder in Yerevan on 1 March 2008. The police operation had aimed to verify that information. For that purpose, members of the relevant police force, without being equipped with any protective gear, had arrived at Freedom Square where about 800 to 900 demonstrators armed with metal rods and wooden clubs had gathered waiting for the police. The demonstrators had attacked the police officers, hitting them and throwing stones, pointed metal objects and Molotov cocktails at them, as a result of which numerous police officers had been injured. 14. The Government, in support of their allegations, submitted a number of official documents, including six records of inspection of the scene drawn up by investigators of the Principal Department for Investigations of the Armenian Police. According to those records, the inspections were carried out on 1 March 2008 at several locations in Freedom Square and the 4 MUSHEGH SAGHATELYAN v. ARMENIA JUDGMENT surrounding park at various times between 8.30 a.m. and 11.45 a.m. and a number of different objects were found including pistols, cartridges, grenades and other explosives, wooden and rubber clubs, metal rods and other metal objects having a spiky, hedgehog-like shape. The Government also submitted a number of expert conclusions produced following the forensic examination of the objects in question. 15. On the same date the Special Investigative Service instituted criminal case no. 62202508 under Article 225.1 §§ 1 and 2, Article 235 §§ 1 and 2 and Article 316 § 2 of the Criminal Code (CC) (see paragraphs 97, 91, 98 and 94 below) in connection with the events at Freedom Square. This decision stated: “After the announcement of the preliminary results of the presidential election of 19 February 2008, the presidential candidate, Mr Levon Ter-Petrosyan, members of parliament, [K.S. and S.M.], the chief editor of Haykakan Zhamanak daily newspaper, [N.P.], and others organised and held mass public events at Yerevan’s Freedom Square in violation of the procedure prescribed by law and incited disobedience to the decisions ordering an end to the events held in violation of the procedure prescribed by law, while a number of participants in the mass events illegally possessed and carried illegally obtained arms and ammunition. On 1 March 2008 at around 6 a.m., when the police took measures aimed at forcibly ending the public events held in violation of the procedure prescribed by law, in compliance with the requirements of section 14 of the Assemblies, Rallies, Marches and Demonstrations Act, the organisers and participants of the events, disobeying the lawful orders of the [police officers], who were performing their official duties, committed a life- and health-threatening assault on them with clubs, metal rods and other adapted objects, which had been in their possession for that purpose, causing the police officers injuries of varied severity.” 3. The subsequent developments and institution of criminal case no.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • List of Issues Prepared by the Committee to Be Considered During the Examination of the Third Periodic Report of Armenia (CAT/C/ARM/3)
    United Nations CAT/C/ARM/Q/3/Add.1 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 10 April 2012 and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment English only or Punishment Committee against Torture Forty-eighth session 7 May–1 June 2012 List of issues prepared by the Committee to be considered during the examination of the third periodic report of Armenia (CAT/C/ARM/3) Addendum Written replies from the Government of the Armenia to the list of issues (CAT/C/ARM/Q/3)* [28 March 2012] * In accordance with the information transmitted to States parties regarding the processing of their reports, the present document was not formally edited before being sent to the United Nations translation services. GE.12- CAT/C/ARM/Q/3/Add.1 Articles 1 and 4 1. The Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia is recently amended with the purpose to bring it in line with the Convention, in particular all the definitions and phrases used in the Convention were included in the articles of torture. All the articles containing the torture elements were amended. The English version of the amendments will be presented as soon as possible. 2. There have been no officials convicted of tortures against those having committed crimes against the person. 3. Two (2) cases were reviewed under Article 119 ("Torture") of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia in 2008. With respect to one of them - G. Alaverdyan’s case - the Court of First Instance delivered a criminal judgment on 2 December 2008 on finding the defendant guilty of committing a crime envisaged under Article 119(2)(3) of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia and imposed a punishment in the form of imprisonment for the term of 3 (three) years.
    [Show full text]
  • Mission in Armenia 29 March to 3 April 2008
    Mission in Armenia 29 March to 3 April 2008 June 2008 - N°499/2 Mission in Armenia, 29 March to 3 April 2008 FOREWORD Alerted by both the "Democracy in Armenia" group and the Civil Society Institute (an FIDH affiliate) to the violent repression that followed the presidential elections in this country in February 2008, the undersigned lawyers and jurist were mandated by the President of the Paris Bar Association (M. le Bâtonnier de l’Ordre des Avocats de Paris) and the International Union of Lawyers (l’Union Internationale des Avocats) on one hand and, on the other hand, the FIDH (International Federation of Human Rights). The mission visited Yerevan from 29 March to 3 April to report on the situation of the right to defend oneself and the right to freedoms in the Republic of ARMENIA following the events that took place in February and March 2008. INTRODUCTION Before considering the legal and juridical context of the mission's work, it is appropriate to recall some chronological milestones to put into perspective the current situation in Armenia and its evolution, seventeen years after the independence of the Republic of Armenia was proclaimed in the Southern Caucasus. - 21 September, 1991: the Republic of Armenia becomes independent following a referendum. - October 1991: Election by universal suffrage of Mr. Levon TER-PETROSIAN, who becomes the first President of the Republic of Armenia. - 1992-1994: Fighting in the autonomous region of Nagorno-Karabakh between the opposing Armenian self- defence forces and the Azerbaijan armed forces. A cease-fire comes into force on 14 May 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • FIRST SECTION CASE of KARAPETYAN and OTHERS V
    FIRST SECTION CASE OF KARAPETYAN AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA (Application no. 59001/08) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 17 November 2016 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. KARAPETYAN AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA JUDGMENT 1 In the case of Karapetyan and Others v. Armenia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, President, Kristina Pardalos, Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, Paul Mahoney, Aleš Pejchal, Robert Spano, Armen Harutyunyan, judges, and Abel Campos, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 30 August and 11 October 2016, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on the last- mentioned date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in an application (no. 59001/08) against the Republic of Armenia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by four Armenian nationals, Mr Vladimir Karapetyan, Ms Martha Ayvazyan, Mr Araqel Semirjyan and Ms Karine Afrikyan (“the applicants”), on 29 November 2008. 2. The applicants were represented by Mr Vahe Grigoryan, a lawyer practising in Yerevan. The Armenian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr G. Kostanyan, Representative of the Government of Armenia before the European Court of Human Rights. 3. The applicants alleged, in particular, that their dismissal from office following their statements in the media had violated their right to freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention. 4. On 17 November 2011 the applicants’ complaint under Article 10 of the Convention was communicated to the Government.
    [Show full text]
  • The Treaty of Sevres As the Legal Basis for the Western Armenia’S Territorial Claims to Turkey ***
    Правова система України й міжнародне право, порівняльне правознавство DOI : 10.36695/2219-5521.2.2019.38 УДК 341.01 O.M. POlivAnOvA , A.A. AbrAAMiAn Olena Mykolayivna Polivanova , Ph .D. in Law, Asso - ciate professor of Kyiv University of Law of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine * ORCID : 0000-0002-5670-8900 Anna Aramivna Abraamian , master student of Kyiv University of Law of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine ** THE TREATY OF SEVRES AS THE LEGAL BASIS FOR THE WESTERN ARMENIA’S TERRITORIAL CLAIMS TO TURKEY *** Problem statement . History of the Armenian statehood has more than a few thousands of years and it may even be regarded as the oldest in the history of human civilization 1. Armenian statehood took different forms: from Azzi-Hayasa confederation (1500 – 1290 BC) to the Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia, also known as the Cilician Armenia, Lesser Armenia, or New Armenia 2 (1198–1375). Sources vary on when Armenian statehood was lost. Some scientists suggest that its loss may be dated to 1375 when the Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia was ceased to exist 3. Others state it was lost in 1045 with the fall of Bagratid Armenia, because Cilician Armenia was outside of the traditional Armenian homeland, while Bagratid Armenia was the last major Armenian state in the Armenian Highlands 4. Nevertheless, since the loss of Armenian statehood at that time, the First Armenian Republic (the Armenian National Council declared the independence of Armenia on 28 May 1918), officially known at the time of its existence as the Democratic Republic of Armenia, was the first mod - ern Armenian state.
    [Show full text]
  • Museums and Written Communication
    Museums and Written Communication Museums and Written Communication: Tradition and Innovation Edited by Nick Winterbotham and Ani Avagyan Museums and Written Communication: Tradition and Innovation Edited by Nick Winterbotham and Ani Avagyan This book first published 2018 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2018 by Nick Winterbotham, Ani Avagyan and contributors All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-0755-6 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-0755-5 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ................................................................................... viii Foreword ........................................................................................................ x Writing and Book within the General Context of the Museum: Speculations on the Problem of the Symposium ................................... 1 Hripsime Pikichian More or Less ................................................................................................ 13 Theodorus Meereboer A Civilisation in Museum Space: Some Theoretical Approaches ... 36 Albert Stepanyan Overcome Your Fears and Start Writing for an Online Community .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kazm ENG.Cdr
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Dedication ................................................................................................................................ 7 I. INTRODUCTORY INFORMATION..................................................................................... 8 II. ABOUT THE NIS ASSESSMENT.......................................................................................13 III. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................18 IV. PROFILE OF CORRUPTION IN ARMENIA .................................................................... 23 V. ANTI-CORRUPTION ACTIVITIES .................................................................................. 25 VI. FOUNDATIONS OF NIS ................................................................................................. 27 VII. NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM .................................................................................. 34 1. LEGISLATURE ...................................................................................................................... 34 2. PRESIDENT ........................................................................................................................ 48 3. EXECUTIVE .......................................................................................................................... 54 4. JUDICIARY ............................................................................................................................. 65 5. CIVIL SERVICE ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT by the COMMISSIONER for HUMAN RIGHTS MR THOMAS HAMMARBERG on HIS VISIT to ARMENIA 7 – 11 October 2007
    Strasbourg, 30 April 2008 CommDH(2008)4 Original version REPORT BY THE COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS MR THOMAS HAMMARBERG ON HIS VISIT TO ARMENIA 7 – 11 October 2007 For the attention of the Committee of Ministers and the Parliamentary Assembly CommDH(2008)4 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................ 4 II. NATIONAL SYSTEM FOR HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTION....................................................... 5 1. HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDER (O MBUDSMAN )...........................................................................................6 2. CIVIL SOCIETY ....................................................................................................................................6 3. NATIONAL ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS ............................................7 III. ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE.................................................................................................. 7 1. STATUS OF JUDGES AND THEIR INDEPENDENCE .....................................................................................8 2. AUXILIARIES OF JUSTICE .....................................................................................................................9 3. THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL ..................................................................................................................9 a) Access to justice and transparency of legal process...........................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Yerevan Green City Action Plan
    DRAFT (3 July 2017) Yerevan Green City Action Plan Yerevan 2017 OFFICIAL USE Yerevan’s Green City Action Plan Disclaimer This Green City Action Plan was prepared for the City of Yerevan by an international team of experts led by Ernst & Young, s.r.o. (Czech Republic). Other members of the consortium included GEOtest, SWECO, SEVEn and local experts. The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), the Czech Government's Official Development Assistance Technical Cooperation Fund or the City of Yerevan do not carry any responsibility for the selection, involvement and monitoring of Ernst & Young and / or any third party claims towards EBRD for utilizing services provided by Ernst & Young. 1 OFFICIAL USE Executive Summary In the light of continuous global urbanization, sustainable development challenges increasingly stem from cities. Yerevan is fully aware of these challenges, as the administrative as well as economic centre of Armenia, the overall economic prosperity of the country is substantially anchored on Yerevan’s economic development The quality of the urban environment, including air, water, soil, biodiversity, environmental assets and ecosystems are negatively impacted by human activities such as transport, energy, water use and waste management. In the recent years, many measures have already been taken to remedy the situation, but the measures should be doubled in the coming years to raise the quality of life in the City to standards seen in many European cities. These efforts will also help Yerevan contribute to global efforts in climate change mitigation and the transition to green economy. Methodology The Green City Action Plan (GCAP) was developed by applying 4 stage methodology, which is as follows: Stage 1 focused on relevant information and data identification, collection, processing and analysis to establish the baseline indicators, which rank the city compared to internationally recognized benchmarks.
    [Show full text]
  • Div Style="Position:Absolute;Top:1541;Left
    ÆÀ. î²ðÆ ÂÆô 21 (1371) Þ²´²Â, ÚàôÜÆê 13, 2008 VOLUME 28, NO. 21 (1371) SATURDAY, JUNE 13, 2008 غð ²ÜÎÆôÜ¾Ü Üàð Òºð´²Î²ÈàôÂÆôÜܺðàì ÆÞʲÜàôÂÆôÜܺðÀ زðî 1-À äÆîÆ Ø²ðî²Ðð²ô¾ð ÎÀ ܺîºÜ ºôðàä²ÚÆ ÊàðÐàôð¸ÆÜ ÎðÎÜàôƱ ÎÿÀê¾ø, вڲêî²ÜÆ ÄàÔàìàôð¸Æ 70 îàÎàêÀ ì²ÊÆ Ø¾æ ¾ ÚàôÜÆêÆ 20-ÆÜ Ð³Û³ëï³ÝÇ ³é³çÇÝ Ý³Ë³- õáõÙ, ³ÛÉ»õ ÝáÛݪ ù³Õ³ù³Ï³Ý å³ñ³ÏÇ íñ³Ûª 4 ų٠ï»õáÕáõ- îúøÂ. ². ¶²¼²ÜÖº²Ü ·³Ñ È»õáÝ î¿ñ-ä»ïñá뻳ÝÇ ·É˳- ß³ñųéÇÃÝ»ñáí ϳï³ñõáõÙ »Ý û³Ùµ: õáñ³Í ѳٳÅáÕáíñ¹³Ï³Ý ß³ñÅ- Ýáñ Ó»ñµ³Ï³ÉáõÃÇõÝÝ»ñ »õ Ñ»- ø³Õ³ù³å»ï³ñ³ÝÁ å³ñï³- ÀÝóóÇÏ ï³ñáõ³Ý ²åñÇÉ 9- Ù³Ý Ï»¹ñáÝÁ ÚáõÝÇë 10-ÇÝ Ññ³- ï³åݹáõÙÝ»ñ§, - Áëáõ³Í ¿ Û³Û- õáñ ¿ 72 ųÙáõ³Û ÁÝóóùÇÝ ÇÝ, ²É. êå»Ý¹Ç³ñ»³ÝÇ ³Ýáõ³Ý å³ñ³Ïáõ³Í Û³Ûï³ñ³ñáõû³Ùµ ï³ñ³ñáõû³Ý Ù¿ç£ å³ï³ëË³Ý ï³É ¹ÇÙáõÙÇÝ: ØÇÝ- û÷»ñ³ÛÇ »õ å³É¿Ç ³½·³ÛÇÝ ³Ï³- »Ï³õ Û³Ûï³ñ³ñ»Éáõ, ÿ г۳ë- Þ³ñÅÙ³Ý Ï»ÝïñáÝÁ ݳ»õ ÏÁ ã»õ ³ÛÅÙ µáÉáñ ÝٳݳïÇå ¹Ç- ¹»ÙdzÛÇ ³Ï³¹»Ù³Ï³Ý óïñáÝÇ ï³ÝÇ Çß˳ÝáõÃÇõÝÝ»ñÁ Çñ»Ýó Û³Ûï³ñ³ñ¿, áñ Çß˳Ýáõû³Ý ³Ûë ÙáõÙÝ»ñÁ Ù»ñÅáõ³Í »Ý: ß¿ÝùÇÝ Ù¿ç ïáõ³Í ë³Ñٳݳ¹ñ³- í»ñçÇÝ ·áñÍáÕáõÃÇõÝÝ»ñáí Ù³ñ- ·áñÍáÕáõÃÇõÝÝ»ñÁ ÏÁ Ëáñ³óÝ»Ý ØÇõë ÏáÕÙ¿, ѳÝñ³ÛÇÝ Ï³ñ- Ï³Ý »ñ¹áõÙÇÝ ³éÇÃáí Çñ ³ñï³- ï³Ññ³õ¿ñ ÏÁ Ý»ï»Ý ºõñáå³Ï³Ý »ñÏñ¿Ý Ý»ñë ɳñáõ³Í íÇ׳ÏÁ »õ ÍÇùÇ áõëáõÙݳëÇñáõû³Ý ¦Î³- ë³Ý³Í ׳éÇÝ Ù¿ç, ê»ñÅ ê³ñ·ë- ÊáñÑáõñ¹ÇÝ ³éç»õ: ³õ»ÉÇ ÏÁ µ³ñ¹³óÝ»Ý ù³Õ³ù³Ï³Ý Éá÷§ ÙÇç³½·³ÛÇÝ Ñ»ÕÇݳϳõáñ »³Ý åÇïÇ å³ï·³Ù¿ñ, ¦...Ù»ñ Åá- Ú³Ûï³ñ³ñáõû³Ý Ù¿ç Áë- ×·Ý³Å³Ù¿Ý ¹áõñë ·³Éáõ Ñ»é³Ý- ϳ½Ù³Ï»ñåáõû³Ý Ññ³å³ñ³Ï³Í Õáíáõñ¹Ç ÙÇç»õ ãå¿ïù ¿ ³Ýçñ- áõ³Í ¿, áñ Ó»ñµ³Ï³Éáõ³Í ¿ ¦Ô³- ϳñÝ»ñÁ£ Ýáñ ïáõ»³ÉÝ»ñÁ, µ³õ³Ï³Ý ïËáõñ å»ïÝ»ñ ëï»ÕÍ»Ýù, ãå¿ïù ¿ ³Ýѳ- ñ³µ³Õ§ ÏáÙÇï¿Ç ݳËÏÇÝ ³Ý¹³Ù гϳé³Ï ß³ñáõݳÏáõáÕ
    [Show full text]
  • Arrival in Baku Itinerary for Azerbaijan, Georgia
    Expat Explore - Version: Thu Sep 23 2021 16:18:54 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) Page: 1/15 Itinerary for Azerbaijan, Georgia & Armenia • Expat Explore Start Point: End Point: Hotel in Baku, Hotel in Yerevan, Please contact us Please contact us from 14:00 hrs 10:00 hrs DAY 1: Arrival in Baku Start in Baku, the largest city on the Caspian Sea and capital of Azerbaijan. Today you have time to settle in and explore at leisure. Think of the city as a combination of Paris and Dubai, a place that offers both history and contemporary culture, and an intriguing blend of east meets west. The heart of the city is a UNESCO World Heritage Site, surrounded by a fortified wall and pleasant pedestrianised boulevards that offer fantastic shopping opportunities. Attractions include the local Carpet Museum and the National Museum of History and Azerbaijan. Experiences Expat Explore - Version: Thu Sep 23 2021 16:18:54 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) Page: 2/15 Arrival. Join up with the tour at our starting hotel in Baku. If you arrive early you’ll have free time to explore the city. The waterfront is a great place to stroll this evening, with a cooling sea breeze and plenty of entertainment options and restaurants. Included Meals Accommodation Breakfast: Lunch: Dinner: Hotel Royal Garden DAY 2: Baku - Gobustan National Park - Mud Volcano Safari - Baku Old City Tour After breakfast, dive straight into exploring the history of Azerbaijan! Head south from Baku to Gobustan National Park. This archaeological reserve is home to mud volcanoes and over 600,000 ancient rock engravings and paintings.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenia ARMENIA
    Armenia I.H.T. Visa: required by all. ARMENIA Duty Free: permitted goods: 400 cigaretters, 1 bottle of alcoholic beverages, a reasonable quantity of perfume for personal use, other goods up to the amount of US$500, for personal use only. Health: typhoid and polio special precautions. All water should be regarded as potentially contaminated HOTELS●MOTELS●INNS GYUMRI HOTEL ARAKS, 31 Gorki str., Gyumri, Republic of Armenia, 377501, tel: (+374312) 2-44-35 , www.arakshotel.am , email: [email protected] YEREVAN ANI PLAZA HOTEL, 19 Sayat Nova Ave, Yerevan, Yerevan 375001, Armenia,+374 10589500, [email protected] ,www.anihotel.com ARARAT HOTEL, Grigor Lusavorih, 7 , Tel.: +374 510000 , Fax: 541101 ARMA HOTEL, Norki Ayginer street, 275 , Tel.: +374 (1) 546000 , Rooms: 20, Floors: 5, Nearest metro station: "Yaritasardakan" ARMENIA 1 Ulitsa Amiriyan 375010 Jerevan Armenia Tel: +374.8852-525383 [email protected]: //www.moon.yerpi.am/armhotel/index.html 1. Amiryan Street , Yerevan, ARMENIA MARRIOTT HOTEL YEREVAN, 0010 Armenia , Phone: 374 10 599 000 , Fax: 374 10 599 001 , Sales: 374 10 599 002 , Sales fax: 374 10 599 256 , http://www.marriott.co.uk AUA BARSAM SUITES HOTEL, 8 Harapetutyan St, Yerevan, Armenia Directory 0010, Phone: 374 10-567567, Email: [email protected] , Country Dialling Code (Tel/Fax): ++374 http://www.hybusiness.com The Armenian Tourism Development Agency (ATDA),(+3741) 542303/06 AVIATRANS HOTEL Abovyan street, 4 , Tel.: +374 (1) 567228 ,Rooms: 15 , Travel [email protected] , http://www.armeniainfo.am Floors 4, Location: Nearest metro station: "Hanrapetutyan" Capital: Yerevan time: GMT + 4 BEST EASTERN METROPOL YEREVAN, 2 2 Mashtots Ave, Yerevan, and Background: An Orthodox Christian country, Armenia was incorporated into Russia Armenia 375015, Phone: 374 1-543701, Email: [email protected] , in 1828 and the USSR in 1920.
    [Show full text]
  • The Youth Exchange Has Started!
    The Youth Exchange has started! SALTO EECA Multipliers Adventures in Adjara Eastern Statistics The SALTO Eastern Europe and Caucasus Resource Centre Support for Advanced Learning and Training Opportunities (SALTO–YOUTH) network within the YOUTH programme was created by the European Commission in the year 2000. SALTO supports quality development in European Youth in Action projects. It organises training courses and shares resources with European youth workers on diff erent priority areas (geographic or thematic). The SALTO Network consists of 8 SALTO Resource Centres, based within diff erent National Agencies of the Youth in Action Programme. More information can be found on www.salto-youth.net The SALTO Eastern Europe and Caucasus Resource Centre was established in Warsaw, Poland, in October 2003, on the basis of a European Commission decision. The aims of the EECA Resource Centre are: • To raise visibility and awareness of the Youth in Action Programme opportunities within the Eastern Europe and Caucasus region; • To provide support and expertise to National Agencies of the Youth in Action Programme by contributing to events promoting cooperation with the EECA region; • To promote International Cooperation with EECA Partner Countries; • To support project organisers in the development of contacts, partnerships and projects. SALTO EECA RC organises: • TRAINING EVENTS with a focus on the development of skills, project management and building up or contact us contact or an understanding of Youth in Action Programme Actions and non-formal education; • DEVELOPMENTAL ACTIVITIES – contact making seminars and study visits aimed at building long-lasting partnerships between organisations from EECA and Programme countries; • INFORMATION ACTIVITIES that enable organisations from EECA Partner Countries to have easy access to the Youth in Action Programme and promote cooperation with counterparts in Programme countries.
    [Show full text]