DePaul Law Review Volume 24 Issue 4 Summer 1975 Article 10 Human Rights, Chile and International Organizations Ferdinand Mesch Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review Recommended Citation Ferdinand Mesch, Human Rights, Chile and International Organizations, 24 DePaul L. Rev. 999 (1975) Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review/vol24/iss4/10 This Comments is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Law at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in DePaul Law Review by an authorized editor of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. HUMAN RIGHTS, CHILE AND INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS Thoreau, in his 1849 essay, "Civil Disobedience," wrote that "the State never intentionally confronts a man's sense, intellectual or moral, but only his body, his senses. It is not armed with superior wit or honesty, but with superior physical strength."' Thoreau recognized the effect of state tyranny on humanity. Though an anarchist then,2 he might be in favor of an international legal regime for the protection of human rights today.8 1. Thoreau, Civil Disobedience, in THOREAU: WALDEN AND OTHER WRITINGS 85, 97 (J. W. Krutch ed. 1962). 2. Id. at 85. 3. Philosopher Robert Nozick of Harvard would probably make an argument against a human rights regime. See reviews of his book Anarchy, State, and Utopia (1975) in NEWSWEEK, Mar. 31, 1975, at 81, and Singer, The Right to be Rich or Poor, N.Y. REv. BOOKS, Mar. 6, 1975, at 19. The power of the state is the most serious threat to an individual's human rights but there are other menaces such as multinational corporations: If the emergent multinationals [corporations] are not effectively subject to national legislation, they are even less subject to the United Nations or regional international governmental organizations (IGOs).