Accessibility, Quality, and Profitability for Personal Plight Law Firms: Hitting the Sweet Spot

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Accessibility, Quality, and Profitability for Personal Plight Law Firms: Hitting the Sweet Spot ACCESSIBILITY, QUALITY, AND PROFITABILITY FOR PERSONAL PLIGHT LAW FIRMS: HITTING THE SWEET SPOT By Noel Semple Prepared for the Canadian Bar Association Futures Initiative ACCESSIBILITY, QUALITY, AND PROFITABILITY FOR PERSONAL PLIGHT LAW FIRMS: HITTING THE SWEET SPOT August 2017 © Canadian Bar Association. 865 Carling Avenue, Suite 500, Ottawa, ON K1S 5S8 Tel.: (613) 237-2925 / (800) 267-8860 / Fax: (613) 237-0185 E-mail: [email protected] Home page: www.cba.org Website: cbafutures.org ALL RIGHTS RESERVED No portion of this paper may be reproduced in any form or by any means without the written permission of the publisher. Printed in Canada Sommaire disponible en français The views expressed in this report are those of the author only and do not necessarily reflect those of the Canadian Bar Association. ISBN: 978-1-927014-41-7 2 ACCESSIBILITY, QUALITY, AND PROFITABILITY FOR PERSONAL PLIGHT LAW FIRMS: HITTING THE SWEET SPOT ACCESSIBILITY, QUALITY, AND PROFITABILITY FOR PERSONAL PLIGHT LAW FIRMS: HITTING THE SWEET SPOT By Noel Semple1 Prepared for the Canadian Bar Association Futures Initiative. ABSTRACT Personal plight legal practice includes all legal work for individual clients whose needs arise from disputes. This is the site of our worst access to justice problems. The goal of this project is to identify sustainable innovations that can make the services of personal plight law firms more accessible to all Canadians. Accessibility is vitally important, but it is not the only thing that matters in personal plight legal practice. Thus, this book seeks out innovations that not only improve accessibility, but also preserve or enhance service quality as well as law firms’ profitability. These “sweet spot” opportunities emerged from interviews with 32 personal plight legal practitioners across the country, and from an extensive review of the literature. The first chapter of this book describes personal plight legal needs, clients, and law firms, and introduces the “sweet spot” frame of reference. The next chapters focus on practical opportunities for personal plight legal practice related to Price Certainty (Chapter 2); Deferred Payment (Chapter 3); Diversifying Services (Chapter 4); Vertical Division of Labour (Chapter 5); and Horizontal Division of Labour (Chapters 6 and 7). The concluding chapter (Chapter 8) compares the prospects for large personal plight law firms, and small ones, to pursue these innovations. Throughout, the book offers practical recommendations for personal plight law firms, and also for regulators and professional groups interested in helping those firms create sustainable access to justice. These recommendations are collected in the Appendix. 3 4 ACCESSIBILITY, QUALITY, AND PROFITABILITY FOR PERSONAL PLIGHT LAW FIRMS: HITTING THE SWEET SPOT TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT .....................................................................................................................................1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................................................................................. 13 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 19 1.1. Personal Plight Legal Needs and the Inaccessibility of Justice ...................................................20 1.2. Actual and Would-Be Personal Plight Clients ...............................................................................22 1.2.1. Legally Inexperienced Clientele .................................................................................................23 1.2.2. One-Shotter Clientele ................................................................................................................24 1.2.3. Emotive and Non-Legal Dimensions of Personal Plight Legal Needs .....................................24 1.3. Personal Plight Law Firms ..............................................................................................................26 1.3.1. Innovation in Personal Plight Legal Services .............................................................................26 1.3.2. Three Aspirations for Personal Plight Law Firms .......................................................................27 1.3.3. Two out of Three: Not Good Enough ........................................................................................28 1.4. The Sweet Spot ..............................................................................................................................31 5 CHAPTER 2 PRICE CERTAINTY ....................................................................................................................... 33 2.1. Price Certainty and Labour Requirement Risk ..............................................................................34 2.2. Labour Requirement Risk ...............................................................................................................34 2.3. The Feasibility of Price Certainty ...................................................................................................36 2.4. Advantages of Price Certainty for Firms and Clients ....................................................................37 2.4.1. Price Certainty Improves Profitability .........................................................................................37 2.4.2. Price Certainty Improves Quality ...............................................................................................39 2.5. Price Certain Retainer Options ......................................................................................................40 2.5.1. Discretionary “Services Rendered” Billing ................................................................................41 2.5.2. Uncapped Time-Based Billing ...................................................................................................41 2.5.3. Flat and Capped Billing ..............................................................................................................42 2.5.4. Advertised vs. Quoted Flat Fees ...............................................................................................44 2.5.5. Escape Hatch Rider ....................................................................................................................46 2.5.6. Recovery-Proportionate Contingency Fee ................................................................................46 2.5.7. No-Win-No-Fee Rider ................................................................................................................47 2.5.8. Legal Expense Insurance ............................................................................................................48 2.6. Addressing Labour Requirement Risk ...........................................................................................49 2.6.1. Legislative Reform to Reduce Labour Requirement Risk ..........................................................49 6 ACCESSIBILITY, QUALITY, AND PROFITABILITY FOR PERSONAL PLIGHT LAW FIRMS: HITTING THE SWEET SPOT 2.6.2. Externalize the Risk : Legal Expense Insurance and Third Party Litigation Funding ................50 2.6.3. Absorb More Risk at the Firm Level ...........................................................................................50 2.7. Conclusion: Price Certainty ...........................................................................................................52 CHAPTER 3 DEFERRED PAYMENT ................................................................................................................. 53 3.1. Access to Justice and Payment Scheduling .................................................................................53 3.2. Non-Payment Risk ..........................................................................................................................54 3.3. Payment Scheduling Spectrum .....................................................................................................55 3.3.1. Pre-Payment & Large Retainer Deposits ...................................................................................55 3.3.2. Smaller Retainer Deposits; Periodic or Delayed Payment ........................................................56 3.3.3. Payment on Recovery .................................................................................................................56 3.3.4. Payment after Recovery .............................................................................................................57 3.3.5. Reverse Payment: Sale of Claim to Firm....................................................................................57 3.4. Managing Non-Payment Risk to Facilitate Deferred Payment ....................................................59 3.4.1. Give Firms More Security over their Work Product ...................................................................60 3.4.2. Reduce Unpredictable Regulation of Fees ................................................................................61 3.4.3. Allow Billed-Basis Accounting for Taxation Purposes ...............................................................62 3.4.4. Contingency Billing as Sweet Spot Price Structure ...................................................................63 3.5. Conclusion: Deferred Payment .....................................................................................................65 7 CHAPTER 4 DIVERSIFYING SERVICES ..........................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • SENATE JUD COMMITTEE -1- January 25, 2012 POSITION STATEMENT: Delivered a Presentation to the Crime Summit
    ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE SENATE JUDICIARY STANDING COMMITTEE January 25, 2012 8:37 a.m. MEMBERS PRESENT Senator Hollis French, Chair Senator Bill Wielechowski, Vice Chair Senator Joe Paskvan Senator Lesil McGuire Senator John Coghill MEMBERS ABSENT All members present OTHER LEGISLATORS PRESENT Senator Gary Stevens Senator Johnny Ellis Senator Fred Dyson Representative Pete Petersen COMMITTEE CALENDAR CRIME SUMMIT - HEARD PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION No previous action to record WITNESS REGISTER ERIN PATTERSON-SEXSON, Lead Advocate Direct Services Coordinator Standing Together Against Rape Anchorage, AK POSITION STATEMENT: Delivered a presentation to the Crime Summit. NANCY MEADE, General Counsel Alaska Court System Anchorage, AK SENATE JUD COMMITTEE -1- January 25, 2012 POSITION STATEMENT: Delivered a presentation to the Crime Summit. DIANE SCHENKER, Project Coordinator Fairbanks Electronic Bail Conditions Project Alaska Court System Anchorage, AK POSITION STATEMENT: Delivered a presentation to the Crime Summit. HELEN SHARRATT, Integrated Justice Coordinator Alaska Court System and Coordinator for MAJIC Anchorage, AK POSITION STATEMENT: Delivered a presentation to the Crime Summit. QUINLAN STEINER, Director Public Defender Agency Department of Administration Anchorage, AK POSITION STATEMENT: Delivered a presentation to the Crime Summit. RICHARD ALLEN, Director Office of Public Advocacy Department of Administration Anchorage, AK POSITION STATEMENT: Delivered a presentation to the Crime Summit. WALT MONEGAN, President and CEO Alaska Native Justice Center Anchorage, AK POSITION STATEMENT: Delivered a presentation to the Crime Summit. JAKE METCALFE, Executive Director Public Safety Employee Association Anchorage, AK POSITION STATEMENT: Delivered a presentation to the Crime Summit. TERRENCE SHANIGAN, Trooper Alaska State Troopers Department of Public Safety Talkeetna, AK SENATE JUD COMMITTEE -2- January 25, 2012 POSITION STATEMENT: Delivered a presentation to the Crime Summit.
    [Show full text]
  • National Crime Commission Conference E
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 18 Article 2 Issue 4 February Winter 1928 National Crime Commission Conference E. R. Cass Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation E. R. Cass, National Crime Commission Conference, 18 Am. Inst. Crim. L. & Criminology 497 (1927-1928) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. NATIONAL CRIME COMMISSION CONFERENCE E. R. CASS2 Crime, from whatever standpoint it is considered, is seen to transcend in importance most of the other great problems of the day. It is a more complex, phenomenon than is generally supposed, and is a constant source of degradation of public and private morality. The citizens of many states have been aroused because of crime, more particularly spectacular crime, and the many statements, some accurate, and too many inaccurate, relative to it and the treatment of the criminal. Attempts to determine the exact *crime situation and its causes bring forth marked differences of opinion. Many reforms are proposed, and cover the entire range of administrative activities from the pblice to the final Court of Appeals, and even the conduct of governors in criminal matters. Each separate official agency dealing with crime defends its methods and attempts to place the responsi- bility elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • Language and Jury Decision-Making in Texas Death Penalty Trials
    The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Doing Death in Texas: Language and Jury Decision-Making in Texas Death Penalty Trials Author: Robin Helene Conley Document No.: 236354 Date Received: November 2011 Award Number: 2009-IJ-CX-0005 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Doing Death in Texas: Language and Jury Decision-Making in Texas Death Penalty Trials A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology by Robin Helene Conley 2011 This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Hard Justice Free
    FREE HARD JUSTICE PDF Lori Foster | 384 pages | 21 Mar 2017 | Harlequin Books | 9780373799329 | English | United States Hard Justice | Halo Machinima | Fandom Its promotional trailer was released Hard Justice YouTube on September 20, Hard Justice Bernard Brown is the starring character, an ex-cop Hard Justice resigns from the Hard Justice department of Regent City after deciding Hard Justice doesn't want to be a part of or contribute to the fact that Regent City is slowly becoming a fascist police state. Unfortunately for him, Esoteria is not much of a difference. After Hard Justice to get a Hard Justice, Bernard finds a job at E. Despite having a dark theme, Hard Justice still contains plenty Hard Justice DigitalPh33r's trademark humor. Max tells Eddie to steel himself for the coming task. Eddie decides to open the door, but Max tells him "Don't split hairs with me. Why go around something when you can go through it", and blasts open the door with his rocket launcher. Entering the house, Max discovers that the occupant of the house has downloaded three tracks of music, causing Eddie to puke violently. Just then, the occupant of the Hard Justice returns, and he is placed under arrest by Max, who tells him that downloading three tracks is equivalent to killing three Hard Justice. Eddie then fires at the "offender", who flees. Max blows up his car. After failing to catch him, they taser him twice and restrain him. In the Hard Justice, Bernard arrives at Esoteria airport, and after clearing the numerous security checkpoints, getting stopped at each of them Hard Justice being nervous.
    [Show full text]
  • March 2019 / Issue No
    “I am hugely honoured “Guilty, I am - radicalised, “Being free doesn’t solve by the opportunity to I was. Yet I still find my your problems it just gives the National Newspaper for Prisoners & Detainees lead HMPPS at such an entire situation incredibly you the space to deal with important time.” Jo Farrar surreal.” Zakaria Amara them.” Melanie Myers a voice for prisoners since Newsround // page 10 Comment // page 31 Comment // page 27 March 2019 / Issue No. 237 / www.insidetime.org / A ‘not for profit’ publication/ ISSN 1743-7342 WORLD BOOK DAY 11 // MOTHER’S DAY 46 // INTERNATIONAL WOMEN’S DAY 54 An average of 60,000 copies distributed monthly Independently verified by the Audit Bureau of Circulations PAROLE REVOLUTION Justice Secretary David Gauke’s ‘landmark reform’ l Prisoners and victims l Process to be more l Victims still have no to have right of appeal transparent to counter veto on decisions to against decisions. ‘profound deficiencies’. release. Inside Time report whether there could have The judge would be able to been serious mistakes or legal either ask the original panel 14 flaws in the ruling. If the Jus- to review its decision or order Credit: HMP Hydebank Wood Under the new plans, victims tice Secretary decides that a fresh hearing by a new who want to challenge a deci- there is a case for the decision panel. The new system will sion to release a particular to be reviewed he will refer apply from this summer to New kids on the block! prisoner would be able to the appeal to a judge at the those with the most serious apply to the Justice Secretary, Parole Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Retributive Hatred As a Reactive Moral Attitude
    Retributive Hatred as a Reactive Moral Attitude Jeramy S. Gee A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2014 Reading Committee: Jean Roberts (Chair) Stephen Gardiner Ingra Schellenberg Cass Weller Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Department of Philosophy ©Copyright 2014 Jeramy S. Gee University of Washington Abstract Retributive Hatred as a Reactive Moral Attitude Jeramy S. Gee Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Jean Roberts Department of Philosophy Philosophers’ attention to negative attitudes has grown in recent decades. However, whereas philosophers have offered a number of descriptions of, and justifications for, attitudes like resentment and contempt, hatred is usually met with antipathy even when we might be inclined to be sympathetic to the hater. In this dissertation I offer a sustained examination of hatred I and make a rather startling claim: There are cases of hatred that are morally justifiable. The kind of hatred I defend is what some philosophers have called retributive hatred. This is hatred adopted in response to wrongdoing and in which hostility is driven by a retributive notion of moral desert. To make my case I argue that retributive hatred is distinguishable from such attitudes as prejudicial hatred, malice, and spite—attitudes with which it is often confused—and that it is not liable to the kinds of criticisms that can be levied against these types of hatred. I then show that retributive hatred should be classified among the reactive attitudes. Thus there are conditions governing when retributive haters can be understood as properly representing their targets as hateful and I argue that these conditions can be met.
    [Show full text]
  • Brecht V Abrahamson: Hard Justice for State Prisoners: Robin A
    Boston College Law Review Volume 35 Article 3 Issue 5 Number 5 9-1-1994 Brecht v Abrahamson: Hard Justice for State Prisoners: Robin A. Colombo Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr Part of the Criminal Law Commons Recommended Citation Robin A. Colombo, Brecht v Abrahamson: Hard Justice for State Prisoners:, 35 B.C.L. Rev. 1103 (1994), http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr/vol35/iss5/3 This Notes is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOTES BRECHT V AB SON: HARD JUSTICE FOR STATE PRISONERS? On April I, 1975, the defendant, a former police officer, kid- napped a 16 year-old girl while she was waiting to pick up her school- teacher mother.' At gunpoint, he handcuffed the girl and took her to his home, with the intention of raping her.' After noticing the young girl looking around the house, as if she were trying to memorize every detail, the defendant took the young girl to a secluded spot and fatally shot her in the head with a .357 pistol." The defendant left the girl's body where it fell and drove to the outskirts of the town, where he abandoned the girl's car on the highway, hazard lights flashing, and hitchhiked to town.4 During the defendant's trial for capital murder, the State intro- duced expert testimony indicating that the victim had bruises on her wrists from handcuffs and that a .357 bullet killed her.' Other testi- mony showed that the defendant possessed handcuffs with traces of blood of the same type as the victim's.° The State also introduced testimony of witnesses that linked the defendant to the area near the abandoned car.
    [Show full text]
  • Women and Gender the Middle East and the Islamic World
    Women Judges in the Muslim World Women and Gender The Middle East and the Islamic World Editors Susanne Dahlgren Judith Tucker Founding Editor Margot Badran VOLUME 15 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/wg Women Judges in the Muslim World A Comparative Study of Discourse and Practice Edited by Nadia Sonneveld and Monika Lindbekk LEIDEN | BOSTON This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 license, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. Further information and the complete license text can be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/ The terms of the CC license apply only to the original material. The use of material from other sources (indicated by a reference) such as diagrams, illustrations, photos and text samples may require further permission from the respective copyright holder. An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched. More information about the initiative can be found at www .knowledgeunlatched.org. Cover image by Amr Okasha. The image depicts a veiled woman—Lady Justice—who carries the scales of justice on her shoulders. She is surrounded by a court of justice. The Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available online at http://catalog.loc.gov LC record available at http://lccn.loc.gov Typeface for the Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic scripts: “Brill”. See and download: brill.com/brill-typeface.
    [Show full text]
  • London Backlist Rights Guides A4 Size.Indd
    Trade Publishing BACKLIST RIGHTS GUIDE LONDON 2019 Table of Contents PAGE PAGE HANOVER SQUARE PRESS MIRA BOOKS (Cont’d.) Steven Hartov ......................................................................................................3 Maria V. Snyder ...........................................................................................48-49 Kelsey Miller ........................................................................................................3 Amanda Stevens ................................................................................................49 Neil Olson ............................................................................................................4 Courtney Evan Tate ..........................................................................................50 Charles Rosenberg .............................................................................................5 Rachel Vincent ............................................................................................50-51 Dan Abrams and David Fisher .........................................................................6 Debra Webb .......................................................................................................51 Susan Wiggs ................................................................................................. 52-54 PARK ROW BOOKS Brianna Wolfson ...............................................................................................54 Gretchen Anthony ..............................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter 17/07 DIGITAL EDITION Nr
    ISSN 1610-2606 ISSN 1610-2606 newsletter 17/07 DIGITAL EDITION Nr. 214 - September 2007 Michael J. Fox Christopher Lloyd LASER HOTLINE - Inh. Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Wolfram Hannemann, MBKS - Talstr. 3 - 70825 K o r n t a l Fon: 0711-832188 - Fax: 0711-8380518 - E-Mail: [email protected] - Web: www.laserhotline.de Newsletter 17/07 (Nr. 214) September 2007 editorial Hallo Laserdisc- und DVD-Fans, sein. Die Temperaturen außerhalb des wenn wir das Editorial bereits an die- liebe Filmfreunde! Büros verlangen geradezu nach einem ser Stelle beenden. Als kleinen Trost Können Sie sich vorstellen, an einem Spaziergang an frischer Luft und an- finden Sie unseren Newsletter heute richtig warmen, sonnigen Samstag- schließender Einkehr in einen Biergar- übrigens wieder in der altbekannten nachmittag ein umfangreiches Editorial ten. Und das wird vermutlich das letzte Form mit vielen bunten Bildchen und zu schreiben? Man bescheinigt uns Mal in diesem Jahr sein, dass es Petrus Titeln aus Deutschland, Japan und den zwar immer wieder, sehr phantasievoll so gut mit uns meint. Solche Chancen USA. Viel Spaß! zu sein, aber die Schreiberei bei Son- dürfen nicht ungenutzt bleiben! Daher nenschein muss nun wirklich nicht bitten wir also um Ihr Verständnis, Ihr LASER HOTLINE Team LASER HOTLINE Seite 2 Newsletter 17/07 (Nr. 214) September 2007 LASER HOTLINE Seite 3 Newsletter 17/07 (Nr. 214) September 2007 Neuankündigungen DVD BRD (Regionalcode 2) Nils Holgersson - Die Original Animation Zeichentrick-Serie, Staffel 02, Die schönsten russischen Folge 19-35 (3 DVDs) Zeichentrickmärchen (4 DVDs) Das bucklige Pferdchen / Die zwölf Monate Nils No Fushigi Na Tabi / Die wilden Schwäne / Zar Saltan und die Caillou - Weihnachten mit Caillou Dir.
    [Show full text]
  • A Marquette Lawyer
    FOUR MODELS OF WHAT IT MEANS TO BE A MARQUETTE LAWYER At Marquette Law School’s annual alumni awards event on April 3, 2019, at Eckstein Hall, Dean Joseph D. Kearney referred to the four recipients as “anomalies.” In fact, he applied that term to all of the several hundred people who attended the program. “There is no requirement that anyone remain involved with his or her law school, years after graduation,” Kearney said. He said that he was happy to label the alumni being honored as “anomalies” who didn’t float on the ebbing tide that, as time passes, carries many lawyers far away from connections to the law school from which they graduated. The four award recipients have followed diverse career paths, each with great success. But the bond they still feel to Marquette Law School—and the ways they continue to show this—brought them together. In the words of Marquette University’s President Michael R. Lovell in introducing the event, the awards “honor what makes Marquette great—that is, our graduates and the work that they do, going out to change the world.” Here are edited excerpts from the presentations given about each of the recipients and the recipients’ acceptance speeches. ALUMNA OF THE YEAR JUSTICE ANNETTE ZIEGLER, L’89 From Dean Joseph D. Kearney The Honorable Annette Kingsland Ziegler arrived to law school and the legal profession largely without direct examples: In particular, she had no lawyers in her family. At the same time, she brought parts of her upbringing to the endeavor: Among other things, a job in the hardware store that her parents owned outside Grand Rapids, Michigan, gave her both considerable experience in working with people and an appreciation of the value of hard work.
    [Show full text]
  • Occupying for Peace, the U.S. Army in Mexico, 1846-1848
    Occupying For Peace, The U.S. Army In Mexico, 1846-1848 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Thomas W. Spahr Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Professor Mark Grimsley Professor John Guilmartin Professor Kenneth J. Andrien Professor Randolph Roth Copyright by Thomas W. Spahr 2011 Abstract This dissertation examines the United States‘ execution of the military occupation of Mexico during the Mexican-American War (1846-1848). It argues that the occupation was successful and played an important role in achieving the American strategic objectives. The occupation succeeded because (a) President James K. Polk and his military commanders formulated a sound and flexible strategy, (b) a relatively competent corps of professional army officers executed that strategy, and (c) the United States Army maintained consistent military superiority over the Mexicans throughout the conflict. This dissertation examines the military occupation in terms of the American management of the Mexican population down to the city level, and the American reaction to Mexican resistance after the conventional army was defeated and driven from different parts of the country. The Americans were successful during the occupation because they applied an artful blend of conciliation toward the population, calibrated coercion, and co-option of much of the Catholic clergy and Mexican elite. The American victories on the conventional battlefield and conciliation of the population did not in themselves convince the Mexicans to cease resistance. The Army eventually succeeded by transitioning to a more punitive policy, targeting those who resisted or abetted resistance, particularly the elite, and by demonstrating to the Mexicans that they were committed to continuing the occupation indefinitely.
    [Show full text]