TABLEOFCONTENTS Introduction...... 1 Tortureandill-treatmentgoeson...... 3 Tortureandill-treatmentinIraqidetentionfacilities...... 4 UndertheeyesoftheMultinationalForce...... 8 ThelegacyoftheAbuGhraibprisonscandal...... 10 Withoutchargeortrial–detentionbytheMultinationalForce ...... 16 LegalbackgroundtodetentionsbytheMultinationalForce ...... 18 Reviewprocess...... 21 ReviewforinterneesheldbytheUSforces...... 22 ReviewforinterneesheldbytheUKforces...... 24 Lengthofinternment ...... 25 Treatmentofinternees ...... 28 Accesstotheoutsideworld...... 31 Visitsbyrelatives...... 32 Visitsbylegalcounsel ...... 33 Visitsbymonitoringbodies...... 33 Secretandunacknowledgeddetention...... 35 Internmentofwomenandchildren ...... 38 “HighValue”Detainees ...... 39 Insufficientsafeguardsfordetainees–nolessonslearned? ...... 41 AmnestyInternationalRecommendations ...... 44 TotheIraqiauthorities...... 44 TogovernmentsofcountriescontributingtotheMNF–inparticulartheUS andtheUK ...... 46

AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 AmnestyInternationalMarch2006

BeyondAbuGhraib: detentionandtorturein “Ihavelostayearandahalfofmylife” 43-year-oldformersecuritydetaineeandfatherofthreedaughtersfollowinghis releaseinSeptember2005;heallegedthathewasill-treated whileheldinUSdetentioninIraq. Introduction NearlythreeyearsafterUnitedStates(US)andalliedforcesinvadedIraqandtoppled thegovernmentofSaddamHussain,thehumanrightssituationinthecountryremains dire.ThedeploymentofUS-ledforcesinIraqandthearmedresponsethatengendered has resulted in thousands of deaths of civilians and widespread abuses amid the ongoingconflict. As Amnesty International has reported elsewhere 1 , many of the abuses occurringtodayarecommittedbyarmedgroupsopposedtotheUS-ledMultinational Force(MNF)andtheIraqigovernmentthatitunderpins.Armedgroupscontinueto wage an uncompromising war marked by their disregard for civilian lives and the basicrulesof international humanitarian law.Theycommitsuicideandotherbomb attacks which either target civilians or while aimed at military objectives are disproportionate in terms of causing civilian casualties, and they abduct and hold victims hostage, threatening and often taking their lives. Amnesty International condemns these abuses, some of which are so egregious as to constitute crimes against humanity, in addition to war crimes, and continues to call on Iraq’s armed groups to cease such activities and abide by basic requirements of international humanitarianlaw. Inthisreport,AmnestyInternationalfocusesonanotherpartoftheequation, specifically its concerns about human rights abuses for which the US-led MNF is directly responsible and those which are increasingly being committed by Iraqi security forces. The record of these forces, including US forces and their United Kingdom(UK)allies, isanunpalatableone.Despitethepre-warrhetoricandpost- invasion justifications of US and UK political leaders, and their obligations under

1AmnestyInternational,Iraq:Incoldblood:abusesbyarmedgroups,25July2005,AIIndex:MDE 14/009/2005.

AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 2 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq

internationallaw,fromtheoutsettheoccupyingforcesattachedinsufficientweightto humanrightsconsiderations.Thisremainsthepositionevenifthe violations bythe MNFthatarethesubjectofthisreportdonothavethesamegraphic,shockqualityas the images that emerged in April 2004 and February 2006 showing inmates being tortured and humiliated by US guards at ’s Abu Ghraib prison and Iraqi youthbeingbeatenbyUKtroopsaftertheywereapprehendedduringariot.Thesame failuretoensuredueprocessthatprevailedthen,however,and facilitated-perhaps even encouraged such abuses – is evidenced today by the continuing detentions withoutchargeortrialofthousandsofpeopleinIraqwhoareclassifiedbytheMNF as“securityinternees”. TheMNFhasestablishedprocedureswhichdeprivedetaineesofhumanrights guaranteed in international human rights law and standards. In particular,the MNF denies detainees their right to challenge the lawfulness of their detention before a court.Someofthedetaineeshavebeenheldforovertwoyearswithoutanyeffective remedy or recourse; others have been released without explanation or apology or reparationaftermonthsindetention,victimsofasystemthatisarbitraryandarecipe forabuse. Manycasesoftortureandill-treatmentofdetaineesheldinfacilitiescontrolled bytheIraqiauthoritieshavebeenreportedsincethehandoverofpowerinJune2004. Amongothermethods,victims have beensubjectedtoelectricshocksorhavebeen beaten with plastic cables. The picture that is emerging is one in which the Iraqi authoritiesaresystematicallyviolatingtherightsofdetaineesinbreachofguarantees containedbothinIraqilegislationandininternationallawandstandards–including therightnottobetorturedandtobepromptlybroughtbeforeajudge. AmnestyInternationalisconcernedthatneithertheMNFnorIraqiauthorities haveestablishedsufficientsafeguardstoprotectdetaineesfromtortureorill-treatment. Itisparticularlyworryingthat,despitereportsoftortureorill-treatmentbyUSand UKforcesandtheIraqiauthorities,forthousandsofdetaineesaccesstotheoutside world continues to be restricted or delayed. Under conditions where monitoring of detentionfacilitiesbyindependentbodiesisrestricted–notleast,duetotheperilous security situation – measures which impose further limitations on the contact detaineesmayhavewithlegalcounselorrelativesincreasetheriskthattheywillbe subjecttotortureorotherformsofabuse. AmnestyInternationaliscallingontheIraqi,USandUKauthorities,whoboth operate detention facilities where persons detained by the MNF are held, to take

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq 3

urgent,concretestepstoensurethatthefundamentalhumanrightsofalldetaineesin Iraqarerespected.Inparticular,theseauthoritiesmusturgentlyputinplaceadequate safeguards to protect detainees from tortureor ill-treatment. This includes ensuring that all allegations of such abuse are subject to prompt, thorough and independent investigation and that any military, security or other officials found to have used, ordered or authorized torture are brought to justice. It includes too ensuring that detaineesareableeffectivelytochallengetheirdetentionbeforeacourt;therightto dosoconstitutesafundamentalsafeguardagainstarbitrarydetentionandtortureand ill-treatment,andisoneofthenon-derogablerightswhichstatesareboundtouphold inallcircumstances,evenintimeofwarornationalemergency.2 Tortureandill-treatmentgoeson KarimR3,a47-yearoldimamandpreacher(khatib),wasdetainedandtorturedby US forces in 2003 and then by Iraqi forces in 2005. On each occasion, he was subsequently released uncharged. He told Amnesty International that he was first detainedinOctober2003byUSforcesinBaghdad,wherehelivesandisheadofa charity.Hewasinsulted,blindfolded,beatenandsubjectedtoelectricshocksfroma stun gun (taser) by US troops at a detention facility in the Kadhimiya district of Baghdad.Aftersevendaysofdetention,hewasreleasedwithoutcharges. KarimRwasagaindetainedinMay2005for16days–thistimebyforcesof theIraqiInteriorMinistryatadetentionfacilitytheyoperatedinBaghdad.Duringthis detention,hewasblindfoldedandthenbeatenandsubjectedtoelectricshockswhile beinghungupinamannerdesignedtocausehimexcruciatingpain.HetoldAmnesty International: “Theytiedmyhandstothebackwithacable.Therewasaninstrumentwitha chainwhichwasattachedtotheceiling.Whentheyswitcheditonthechain pulledmeuptotheceiling.Becausethehandsaretiedtothebackthisiseven morepainful(…)Afterwardstheythrewwaterovermeandtheyusedelectric shocks.Theyconnectedthecurrenttomylegsandalsotootherpartsofmy body.(…)ThefirsttimetheysubjectedmetoelectricshocksIfaintedfor40 secondsoroneminute.Itfeltlikefallingfromabuilding.Ihadaheadacheand was not able to walk. The interrogator said: You better confess to terrorist activities, in orderto save your life. I responded that I was not involved in theseactivitiesandthatIhadaheartcondition.(…)Latertheyforcedmeto

2HumanRightsCommittee,GeneralComment29:StatesofEmergency,UNDoc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.11,paras7and16. 3Attheperson’srequestthenameisnotpublishedinthisreport.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 4 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq

confess on camera. They asked questions claiming that I was aterrorist but theydidnotevengivemethechancetoreply.They juststatedthatIwasa terrorist.(…).”

Tortureandill-treatmentinIraqidetentionfacilities IntheweeksleadinguptoIraq’sparliamentaryelections,heldon15December2005, newevidenceemergedtoindicatethattheIraqiInteriorMinistrywasholdingmany detaineesindifferentfacilitiesunderitscontrolandsubjectingthemtotortureandill- treatment. On 13 November 2005, US military forces raided one detention facility controlledbytheInteriorMinistryintheal-JadiriyahdistrictofBaghdad,wherethey reportedlyfoundmorethan170detaineesbeingheldinappallingconditions,manyof whomallegedthattheyhadbeentortured.On8December2005,Iraqiauthoritiesand US forces inspected another detention facility in Baghdad, also controlled by the Interior Ministry. At least 13 of the 625 detainees found there required medical treatment,includingseveralreportedlyasaresultoftortureorill-treatment.TheIraqi 4 MinistryofInteriordeniedthatanydetaineeshadbeentorturedorabused. However, theUSambassadortoIraq,ZalmayKhalilzad,statedthat“over100”detaineesfound atthedetentionfacilityinal-Jadiriyahand26detaineesattheotherdetentionlocation hadbeenabused.5 Accordingtomediareports,inbothcasesdetaineesallegedthattheyhadbeen subjectedtoelectricshocksandhadtheirnailspulledout.6AnIraqiHumanRights MinistryofficialsubsequentlytoldAmnestyInternationalthattheIraqiauthoritieshad conducted medical examinations but that these had not confirmed the allegations. However,theofficialstatedthatseveraldetaineeshadinjuriescausedbybeatingwith plasticcables.Further,theofficialconfirmedthatabusescommittedatotherdetention facilitiesunderthecontrolofIraqiauthoritiesoverthepastyearincludedincidentsof detaineeshavingbeensubjectedtoelectricshocks.7 Monthsearlier,HumanRightsWatchhaddrawnattentiontoincreasingreports of torture and ill-treatment of detainees by Iraqi government forces in a report

4AnofficialoftheIraqiInteriorMinistrywasquotedsayingthattherehadbeen“nomistreatmentor torture.…Onlyafewguyswereslappedontheirfaces”(NewYorkTimes,KirkSemple,Iraqi MinistryDeniesCaptivesWereAbused,13December2005). 5NewYorkTimes,JohnF.Burns,ToHaltAbuses,U.S.WillInspectJailsRunbyIraq,14December 2005. 6BBC,CarolineHawley,Iraqidetaineestelloftorture,24November2005, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4465194.stm;WashingtonPost,EllenKnickmeyer, AbuseCitedIn2ndJailOperatedbyIraqiMinistry,12December2005. 7Phoneconversationson4and5February2006.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq 5

publishedinJanuary2005.ThereportwasbasedoninterviewswhichHumanRights Watch had conducted with 90 detainees and former detainees between July and October2004,72ofwhomdisclosedthattheyhadbeentorturedorill-treatedwhilein detention. Some had been held as criminal suspects but others had been detained apparently because of their political activities or alleged affiliation with armed groups.8Yet,despitetheHumanRightsWatchfindings,littleornoactionappearsto havebeentakenbyeithertheIraqigovernmentortheMNFinthemonthsfollowing toaddressthispatternabuse,andtosafeguarddetaineesfromtortureorill-treatment.

Unsurprisingly,inviewofthisfailuretocrackdownonthetorturersandend thecycleofabuse,severaldetaineesarereportedtohavedied in 2005while being heldinthecustodyoftheIraqiauthorities;inseveralcases,thebodiesofthevictims reportedly bore injuries consistent with their having been tortured. On 12 February 2005 three men, who were reportedly members of the Badr Organization,9a Shi’a militia,diedincustodyafterbeingarrestedbyIraqipoliceatapolicecheckpointin theZafaraniyadistrictofBaghdad.Thebodiesof39-year-oldMajbal‘AdnanLatif al-Alawi,his35-year-oldbrother‘Ali‘AdnanLatifal-Alawi,and30-year-old‘Aidi Mahassin Lifteh were found three days later, bearing marks of torture. Autopsy reports found “that all three had bruises on their faces, arms, backs, and legs, apparentlyfrombeingstruckwithastickorlongobject”.10

AfterhavingbeendetainedbyaspecialpoliceforceoftheInteriorMinistry, the Wolf Brigade 11 , a 46-year-old housewife from Mosul, Khalida Zakiya, was shown in February 2005 on the Iraqi TV channel al-‘Iraqiya alleging that she had supportedanarmedgroup.However,shelaterwithdrewthisconfessionandalleged

8HumanRightsWatch,TheNewIraq?Tortureandill-treatmentofdetaineesinIraqicustody,January 2005,Vol.17No.1(D). 9TheBadrBrigade,aShi’amilitiafoundedinthe1980sinbyMohammedBaqeral-Hakimto fightSaddamHussain’sgovernmentinIraq,announceddisarmamentandrenameditselfintoBadr OrganizationforReconstructionandDevelopmentin2003.ItisaffiliatedtotheSupremeCouncilof theIslamicRevolutioninIraq(SCIRI)whichispartoftheShiadominatedUnitedAllianceofIraq (UAI).UndertheIraqiTransitionalGovernmentwhichwasformedinApril2005,BayanJabrSolagh, aseniorofficialofSCIRIbecameMinisterofInterior. 10BostonGlobe,AnneBarnard,DeathsspurcallstooverhaulIraqipolice,31March2005. 11TheWolfBrigade,foundedinOctober2004,wasgiventwomonthstrainingbyUSmilitarytrainers beforebeingdeployedinsecurityoperationsagainstarmedgroups(KnightRidder,HannahAllam, WolfBrigadethemostlovedandfearedofIraqisecurityforces,21May2005).TheWolfBrigadehas reportedlyresortedlarge-scaletosecretdetentions,tortureandill-treatment.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 6 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq

thatshehadbeencoercedintomakingit.Shewasreportedlywhippedwithacableby membersoftheWolfBrigadeandthreatenedwithsexualabuse.12

InMay2005fourPalestinianswhowerelongtermresidentsofIraq-,Faraj ‘Abdullah Mulhim, aged about 41, ‘Adnan ‘Abdullah Mulhim, aged about 31, Amir‘AbdullahMulhim,agedabout26,andMas’udNural-Dinal-Mahdi,aged about33–weretorturedandill-treatedaftertheyweredetainedbymembersofthe WolfBrigadewhotookthemfromtheirhomesinBaghdad.Allfourwereseizedon thenightof12May2005,whenWolfBrigadeforcesstormedhomesintheBaladiyat Palestinian Building within Baladiyat Camp in Baghdad. They were arrested as suspectsinabombattackthathadbeencarriedoutearlierthatdayinBaghdad’sal- Jadidadistrictalthoughtheydeniedanyinvolvement.MembersoftheWolfBrigade weresaidtohavebeatenthefourmenwithriflebuttswhentheyarrestedthem.

On 14 May 2005, the four men were shown on the Iraqi TV channel al-‘Iraqiyya admitting responsibility for the al-Jadida bomb attack but all showed visible signs of having been assaulted. Relatives who saw the programme told AmnestyInternationalthatthefourmenhadinjuriestotheirfaceswhichledthemto suspectthattheyhadbeensubjectedtotortureorill-treatmentinordertoforcethem tomakeconfessions.Later,whenthemengainedaccesstoalawyerinJuly2005they repudiatedtheirconfessionsandallegedthattheyhadbeensystematicallytorturedfor 27dayswhilebeingheldbytheWolfBrigadeinaMinistryofInteriorbuildinginthe al-ZiyounadistrictofBaghdad.Theystatedthattheyhadbeenbeatenwithcablesand hadelectricshocksappliedtotheirhands,wrists,fingers,anklesandfeet.Theyalso saidtheywereburntonthefacewithlightedcigarettesandwereplacedinaroom withwateronthefloorwhileanelectriccurrentwaspassedthrough.Theyallegedtoo that a US military officer was present atonetime in the room in which they were beinginterrogated.

The four men also allege that they were forced under torture to sign confessionswhiletheywereblindfoldedinwhichtheyalsoadmittedresponsibilityfor five other bomb attacks said to have been committed at police stations in other districts of Baghdad. However, when their lawyer looked into these other alleged bombings he found thatthey had never taken place and was able toobtain official documentationtoconfirmthis.Nevertheless,thefourPalestiniansweretransferredto thedetentionoftheMajorCrimesDirectorate(mudiriyatal-jara’imal-kubra) inthe RusafadistrictofBaghdadon9June2005.Atfirst,theseniorofficeratthisplaceof

12AssociatedPress,MariamFam,IraqisSaySecurityForcesUseTorture,6July2005;LosAngeles Times,SolomonMooreandScottGold,NationalGuardtiedtoIraqipolice,28July2005.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq 7

detention reportedly refused to accept the four men because they were clearly suffering from serious injuries. However, an investigating officer (dhabit al-tahqiq) reportedly listed all their injuries, so that it would be clear that they had not been inflictedunderhisdirection.Sixweeks later,around23July,thePalestinianswere transferred to the detention centre in al-A’zamiya district of Baghdad, which deals withcasesinvolvinginIraq.

According to Iraqi legislation, a detainee must be brought before an investigating judgewithin24 hoursofarrest.13However,the fourPalestinianswere onlybroughtbeforeaninvestigatingjudgeonorabout26July2005,overfiveweeks aftertheirinitialdetention.Atthebeginningof2006thefourPalestinianscontinued tobeheld.

In July, 2005, the UK’s Observer newspaper reported on further cases of torture and other grave human rights abuses, including possible extrajudicial executions,byIraqisecurityforces.Thenewspaperincludedadetaileddescriptionof filmfootageshowingthecorpseofHassanal-Nu’aimi,aSunniclericandmemberof theAssociationofMuslimScholars,whowasfounddeadinMay2005inBaghdad– one day after he was detained by Iraqi police commandoes. The Observer’s correspondentwrote:

“There are police-issue handcuffs still attached toone wrist, from which he washangedlongenoughtocausehishandsandwriststoswell.Thereareburn marksonhischest,asifsomeonehasplacedsomethingveryhotnearhisright nipple and moved it around. A little lower are a series of horizontal welts, wrappingaroundhisbodyandbreakingtheskinastheyturnaroundhischest, asifhehadbeenbeatenwithsomethingflexible,perhapsacable.Thereare otherinjuries:abrokennoseandsmallerwoundsthatlooklikecigaretteburns. Anarmappearstohavebeenbrokenandoneofthehighervertebraeispushed inwards.Thereisaclusterofsmall,neatcircularwoundsonbothsidesofhis leftknee.Atsomestagean-Ni’ami[sic]seemstohavebeenefficientlyknee- capped.Itwasnotdonewithagun-theexitwoundsareidenticalinsizetothe entry wounds, which would not happen with a bullet. Instead it appears to havebeendonewithsomethinglikeadrill.Whatactuallykilledhimhowever were the bullets fired into his chest at close range, probably by someone standingoverhimashelayontheground.Thelasttwohithiminthehead.”14

13Article123oftheCodeofCriminalProcedure,LawNo.23of1971,asamended. 14TheObserver,PeterBeaumont,Revealed:grimworldofnewIraqitorturecamps,3July2005.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 8 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq

The same month, July 2005, nine out of a group of 12 men who had been detained by police in Baghdad’s al-‘Amirya district suffocated to death after they wereconfinedinapolicevanforupto14hoursinextremelyhightemperatures.The Iraqi authorities said that the 12 were members of an armed group who had been detainedaftertheywereengagedinanexchangeoffirewithUSorIraqiforces.Other sources, however, suggested that they were a group of bricklayers who had been detainedonsuspicionthattheywereinsurgentsandthenbrutallytorturedbypolice commandoes before being confined in the police vehicle. Medical staff at the YarmoukHospitalinBaghdad,wherethebodiesofthosewhodiedweretakenon11 July 2005, reportedly confirmed that some of them bore signs of torture, including electricshocks.15

UndertheeyesoftheMultinationalForce MNF officials have generally sought to distance the US-led alliance from any involvementwhentherehasbeenpublicityregardingtortureandotherabusesbyIraqi governmentforces.However,theincreasingavailabilityofsuchinformationsinceat leastthebeginningof2005,aswellasthecontinuingclosedaytodaycollaboration between MNF forces and those of the Iraqi government, suggests that MNF commandersandthegovernmentstowhichtheyareresponsiblehavebeenwellaware for a considerable time that the Iraqi forces they support are responsible for gross abusesofhumanrights.Yet,aspartoftheircooperationwithIraqigovernmentforces, the MNF continued to hand over some of those whom its forces detained into the custody of Iraqi forces, despite the obvious risks to which this must expose such prisoners. In this respect, the MNF would appear to have been either seriously negligent or, effectively, complicit in the abuses committed by Iraqi government forcesandsupineintheirfailuretomakecleartotheIraqigovernmentanditsforces thattortureandotherviolationsagainstprisonersmustnotbetolerated,andthatthose whocommitsuchabusemustbebroughtpromptlytojustice.16

15AmnestyInternational,Iraq:AmnestyInternationalcallsforaninvestigationintodeathincustodyof ninemen,14July2005,AIIndex:MDE14/017/2005. 16StatescomposingtheMNFhaveobligationstoimplementtheirobligationsunderhumanrightslaw inIraq.Forexample,theCommitteeagainstTorturehasstressedtotheUKinrelationtothe applicabilityoftheConventionagainstTortureinIraqthatthe“Conventionprotectionsextendtoall territoriesunderthejurisdictionofaStatepartyandconsidersthatthisprincipleincludesallareas underthedefactoeffectivecontroloftheStateparty'sauthorities.”CommitteeagainstTorture, ConclusionsandRecommendations:UnitedKingdomofGreatBritainandNorthernIreland– DependantTerritories,UNDoc.CAT/C/CR/33/3,10December2004.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq 9

Thatthe US authorities have been awareof theproblem of torture by their IraqialliesisclearfromtheUSDepartmentofState’sannualreport17toCongresson humanrightspracticesaroundtheworld,whoseFebruary2005edition,reportingon 2004,madeextensivereferenceinitsIraqcountrychaptertoinformationontorture published by Human Rights Watch. 18 However, it was not until December 2005, nearlyayearaftertheStateDepartment’sreportwascompiled,beforeaUSmilitary commanderannouncedthathisforcesweresuspendingtheirpracticeofhandingover detaineestotheIraqiauthorities,MajorGeneralJohnD.Gardner,commanderofTask Force134,whichisinchargeofMNFdetentionoperations,stated:“Wewillnotpass onfacilitiesordetaineesuntilthey[theIraqiauthorities]meetthestandardswedefine andthatweareusingtoday”.19 There have also been allegations that US forces knew that detainees were beingtorturedandill-treatedatplacesofdetentionunderthecontroloftheInterior Ministry, which they frequently visited. In a radio interview in December 2005, a formercommanderofspecialforcesattheInteriorMinistry,GeneralMuntazarJasim al-Samarra’i, identified several detention locations of the Interior Ministry where torturehasallegedlybeencommonplace.Heclaimed:“Theprisononal-NasrSquare, nexttotheTV-tower,itisthe largestprisonundertheresponsibilityoftheInterior Ministry. Members of the US forces visited this prison every day. The US troops kneweverythingaboutthetorture”.20 Former detainees who were subjected to torture or ill-treatment or who witnessedtheinflictionofsuchabusesonfellowdetaineeswhiletheywerebeingheld in the custody of the Iraqi authorities, have told Amnesty International that such incidentsoccurredwiththeknowledgeoreveninthepresenceofUStroops.21 TheNew YorkTimesreportedan incidentwhichoccurredinMarch2005 in SamarrafollowingajointraidbyUStroopsandforcesunderthecontroloftheIraqi InteriorMinistry.ThereporterdescribedthebeatingofanIraqidetaineebyanIraqi policecaptainduringwhichUStroopswerepresent:“Insteadofaquickhitorslap, 17USDepartmentofState,CountryReportsonHumanRightsPractices,Iraq,28February2005, http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2004/41722.htm. 18HumanRightsWatch,TheNewIraq?Tortureandill-treatmentofdetaineesinIraqicustody, January2005,Vol17,No.1(D). 19NewYorkTimes,EricSchmittandThomShanker,U.S.,CitingAbuseinIraqiPrisons,Holds Detainees,25December2005. 20Deutschlandradio,MarcThorner,UrnengangimSchattendestaglichenTerrors,14December2005, http://www.dradio.de/dlf/sendungen/hintergrundpolitik/448279/. 21Seeforexample:AmnestyInternational:AliSafaral-Bawy:atestimony,28April2005, http://web.amnesty.org/pages/irq-280405-testimony-eng.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 10 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq

we now saw and heard a sustained series of blows. We heard the sound of the captain’sfistsandbootsonthedetainee’sbody,andweheardthedetainee’spained grunts as he received his punishment withoutresistance.” A US Air Force captain present at the incident reportedly made the following comment: “If I think they’re goingtoshootsomebodyorcuthisfingeroffordoanysortofpermanentdamage,I willimmediatelystopthem(…)AsAmericans,wewillnotletthathappen.Interms ofkickingaguy,theydothatallthetime,punchesandstufflikethat.”22 Atthemostseniorlevels,however,thereappeartohavebeendifferentviews within the US politico-military establishment as to the responsibility of US troops whowitnessincidentsoftortureorill-treatment.WhenquestionedinNovember2005 about the use of torture by Iraqi authorities, US Secretary of Defense Donald RumsfeldwasreportedtohaverespondedthathedidnotconsiderthatUSsoldiers whosee“inhumanetreatment”ofdetaineeshaveanobligationtointervenetostopit. TheChairmanoftheJointChiefsofStaff,however,GeneralPeterPace,interjected “Iftheyarephysicallypresentwheninhumanetreatmentistakingplace,sir,theyhave anobligationtostopit”.23

ThelegacyoftheAbuGhraibprisonscandal InFebruary2004,theInternationalCommitteeoftheRedCross(ICRC)submitteda report to the Coalition Forces24which described serious violations of international humanitarianlawcommittedbytheseforcesinIraq.Theseincludedbrutalityagainst protectedpersonsduringtheirarrestandinitialdetention,sometimescausingdeathor serious injury, as well as various methods of torture and ill-treatment inflicted on detainees. The public release of images in April 2004 showing detainees being torturedandill-treatedbyUSsoldiersatAbuGhraibprison,causedworldwideshock, horrorandoutrage.ThesubsequentUSmilitaryinvestigationinIraqheadedbyMajor GeneralAntonioTagubafoundthatCoalitionForceswereresponsiblefor“systemic” and“illegalabuseofdetainees”heldatAbuGhraibprisonbetweenAugust2003and February2004,andconcludedthatsoldiershad“committedegregiousactsandgrave breachesofinternationallawatAbuGhraib…”.25

22NewYorkTimes,PeterMaass,TheWayoftheCommandos,1May2005.InthesamearticlePeter MaassdescribesanotherincidentwhichoccurredduringhisvisittoSamaraatadetentionfacility whereUStroopsandIraqisecurityforcesbothoperated.Hewitnessed“aleather-jacketedsecurity official[who]wasslappingandkickingadetaineewhowassittingontheground”. 23WashingtonPost,DanaMilbank,Rumsfeld’sWaron‘Insurgents’,30November2005. 24WiththedisestablishmentoftheCoalitionProvisionalAuthority(CPA)inJune2004theterm CoalitionForceshasbeenreplacedbytheMultinationalForce. 25The“TagubaReport”onTreatmentofAbuGhraibPrisonersInIraq,Article15-6Investigationofthe 800thMilitaryPoliceBrigade,http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/iraq/tagubarpt.html.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq 11

AmnestyInternationalinterviewedformerdetaineeswhodisclosedthatthey wereamongtheprisonerssubjectedtotortureandill-treatmentinUScustodyatAbu Ghraib.Theyincludedwomenwhosaidtheyhadbeenbeaten,threatenedwithrape, subjectedtohumiliatingtreatmentand longperiodsofsolitaryconfinement.Some formerdetaineestoldAmnestyInternationalthatthey hadbeen forcedtolieonthe ground while handcuffed and hooded or blindfolded for long periods. They were repeatedly beaten,restrained forprolongedperiods inpainful “stress”positionsand somewerealsosubjectedtosleepdeprivation,prolongedstanding,andexposureto loudmusicandbrightlights,apparentlyintendedtocausedisorientation. Othertestimoniesofdetaineeswhoweretorturedorill-treatedatAbuGhraib prison were documented by human rights organizations and in the media. Male detainees complained that they were deliberately degraded by being forced to masturbate in frontof female soldiers and to wear women’s underwear. They were keptnaked,sometimesforseveraldays.Detaineeswereassaultedandthreatenedwith rape.Theyallegedtoothattheywereforced,inbreachoftheirreligiousbeliefs,toeat pork,todrinkalcoholandtomoveaboutonallfoursinimitationofdogs. The videotaped testimony of one Abu Ghraib victim, Hussein Mutar, was shown inevidencetoaUSmilitarycourtmartialsitting inTexas,USA,inJanuary 2005.HusseinMutarhadreportedlybeendetainedonsuspicionofcartheftandwas torturedandill-treatedwhileheldatAbuGhraibinNovember2003.26Intheevidence laidbeforethecourtmartial,heidentifiedhimselfasoneofanumberofprisonersina photograph taken by a US guard at the prison which showed several naked male detaineesbeingforcedtolieontopofoneanother.Healsospokeofhisfeelingsof humiliationandshamewhenUSguardsforcedhimtomasturbateoverfellowinmates: “Icouldn’timagineitinthebeginningthatthiscouldhappen.ButIwishedformy death,thatIcouldkillmyself,becausenooneovertherewouldstopwhatwasgoing on”.27 FollowingtheworldwidedisclosureoftheabusesofdetaineesatAbuGhraib inApril2004,theUSauthoritiesundertookvariousinquiriesandreviews,andcourt- martialed a number of the US prison guards who were depicted in photographs abusingprisoners.Theseinvestigations,however,havemostlybeeninternalmilitary investigations which appear to have focused on the culpability of those within the 26BBC,AbuGhraibinmatesrecalltorture,12January2005, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4165627.stm. 27CounterPunch,VoicesfromAbuGhraib-TheInjuredParty,20January2005, http://www.ccmep.org/2005_articles/civil%20liberties/012005_counterpunch.htm.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 12 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq

lowerechelonsofthemilitary,notontheroleandresponsibilitiesofthosehigherup thechainofcommand,includingatthemostseniorlevels.Forexample,on10March 2005,theUSauthoritiesreleasedasummaryofthefindingsofareviewcarriedoutby ViceAdmiralAlbertT.Church,Inspector-GeneraloftheUSNavywhichhadbeen initiated by US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld in May 2004. The review found“noconnectionbetweeninterrogationpolicyandabuse”.28Onlytheexecutive summarywasmadepublicandtheremainderofthe378-pageChurchReportremains classified.Itwasrevealed,however,thattheChurchinvestigationfailedtointerview anyIraqidetaineesorformerdetainees.NordiditinterviewSecretaryRumsfeld. The US authorities have stated on numerous occasions that its regime of detention inIraqhas fundamentallychangedsinceabusesattheAbuGhraibprison wereexposed.TheUSgovernment’ssecondperiodicreporttotheUNCommittee AgainstTortureofJune2005states:“TheDepartmentofDefense has improved its detention operations in Iraq and elsewhere, improvements have been made based uponthelessonslearned,andinpartbecauseofthebroadinvestigationsandfocused inquiries into specific allegations. These comprehensive reports, reforms, investigations and prosecutions make clear the commitment of the Department of Defensetodoeverythingpossibletoensurethatdetaineeabusesuchasoccurredat AbuGhraibneverhappensagain.”29However,therecontinuetobereportsoftorture and ill-treatment of detainees by US troops, which have occurred since the Abu Ghraibprisonscandalwasexposed.30 WhiledozensofUSsoldiershavebeencourt-martialedinconnectionwiththe abuse of detainees, senior US administration officials have remained free from independentscrutiny.AccordingtotheUSgovernment,asof1October2005there hadbeen65courts-martialinconnectionwiththeabuseofdetaineesinIraq.31InJune 2004,two US marines were sentenced to eight and 12 months’ imprisonment by a military court in Iraq. Both men had pleaded guilty to giving electric shocks to an 32 Iraqiprisoneratal-Mahmudiyaprison,southofBaghdad. AtleastnineUSsoldiers weretriedbeforeUSmilitarycourtsfortheirinvolvementinthehigh-profileincidents oftortureorill-treatmentofdetaineesatAbuGhraibprison.Sentencesrangedfrom

28http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Mar2005/d20050310exe.pdf. 29SecondPeriodicReportoftheUSAtotheCommitteeagainstTorture,UNDoc.CAT/C/48/Add.3, 29June2005,Annex1,PartTwo,page77. 30Seesectionbelow:Treatmentofinternees. 31UnitedStatesofAmerica,UpdatetoAnnexOneoftheSecondPeriodicReportoftheUnitedStates ofAmericatotheCommitteeAgainstTorture,21October2005. 32TheGuardian,USmarinespleadguiltytoprisonerabuse,3June2004.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq 13

non-custodialdisciplinarymeasuresto10years’imprisonment.33AccordingtotheUS government,54militarypersonnelcouldbeimplicatedintheincidentsatAbuGhraib 34 prison. AmnestyInternational isconcernedthatseveral ofthosetriedandconvicted by US military courts for committing serious human rights violations in Iraq, including torture or ill-treatment, have received sentences that fail to reflect the gravityoftheseviolations. InSeptember2004,a1stLieutenantintheUSArmywasreferredtotrialby court-martial on charges including conspiracy, aggravated assault, involuntary manslaughterandobstructionofjustice.Thecaseinvolvedincidentson5December 2003inwhichanIraqidetaineewasforcedintotheTigrisRivernearBalad,andon3 January 2004 in which two Iraqi detainees wereforced off a bridge intothe Tigris nearSamarra.Oneofthedetainees,19-year-oldZaidoun Hassoun,drownedinthe latterincident.Thelieutenantwasfacingamaximumsentenceof29years’inprison. Intheevent,hewassentencedto45days’confinementfollowingatwo-daycourt- martial in Fort Hood, Texas, on 14 and 15 March 2005. Based on a pre-trial agreement,thecommandingauthoritydidnotpursuethemanslaughterchargeandthe soldierinsteadpleadedguiltytoassaultcharges.35 On23January2006,aUScourtmartialconvictedaUSarmyinterrogatorof the killing of ‘Abd Hamad Mawoush and sentenced him to forfeit $6,000 of his salaryoverthenextfourmonths,toreceivea formalreprimandandspend60days restrictedtohishome,officeandchurch.‘AbdHamadMawoush,amajorgeneralin the Iraqi army under the government of Saddam Hussain, died in a US detention facilityinAlQaiminnorthwestBaghdadon26November2003,twoweeksafterhe had handed himself in to the US military. He died after being interrogated while allegedlybeingrolledbackandforthwithasleepingbagoverhisheadandbody,and the interrogatorsatonhischestandplacedhishandsoverhis mouth.Accordingto witness testimony, the interrogator also stood by while Iraqi personnel of the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) subjected ‘Abd Hamad Mawoush to a brutal beatingwithhoses.Theconvictedinterrogatorhadfacedamaximumpenaltyoflife

33ArmyNewsService,L.B.Edgar,CourtsentencesEnglandto3years,28September2005, http://www4.army.mil/ocpa/read.php?story_id_key=7988.ArmyNewsService,L.B.Edgar,Harman foundguiltyforAbuGhraib,19May2005,http://www4.army.mil/ocpa/read.php?story_id_key=7348. 34UnitedStatesofAmerica,UpdatetoAnnexOneoftheSecondPeriodicReportoftheUnitedStates ofAmericatotheCommitteeAgainstTorture,21October2005. 357thInfantryDivisionandFortCarsonPublicAffairsOffice,Pressrelease,Courtmartialverdictand sentence,16March2005.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 14 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq

imprisonmentonchargesofmurder.However,thecourtmartialfoundhimguiltyof lesser charges of “negligent homicide and dereliction of duty,” which carries a maximumofthreeyears’imprisonment.36 SeveralUKsoldiershavealsobeenchargedinconnectionwithallegedtorture or ill-treatment and the deaths of detainees. On 21 December 2005, the Court of Appeal of England and Wales ruled in a case arising from the death in September 2003of26-yearoldBahaDawoudSalemal-Maliki(alsoknownasBahaMousa)and the deaths of five other Iraqis in the caseof R (Al-Skeini) v Secretary of State for Defence. Delivering judgment, Lord Justice Brooke recounted what had occurred whenUKtroopsraidedaBasrahotel,whereBahaMoussaworkedasareceptionist, onthemorningof14September2003.Thetroops,whowereseekingtolocateoneof thepartnerswhoranthehotel: “roundedupanumberofthementheyfoundthere,includingBahaMousa. BahaMousa'sfather, Daoud Mousa, had been a police officerfor 24 years andwasbythenacolonelintheBasrahpolice.Hehadcalledatthehotelthat morningtopickuphissonattheendofhisshift,andhetoldthe…lieutenant inchargeoftheunitthathehadseenthreeofhissoldierspocketingmoney fromthesafe.Duringthisvisithealsosawhissonlyingonthefloorofthe hotellobbywithsixotherhotelemployeeswiththeirhandsbehindtheirheads. Thelieutenantassuredhimthatthiswasaroutineinvestigationthatwouldbe overinacoupleofhours.ColonelMousaneversawhissonaliveagain.Four dayslaterhe wasinvitedbyamilitarypoliceunittoidentifyhisson'sdead body.Itwascoveredinbloodandbruises.Thenosewasbadlybroken,there wasbloodcomingfromthenoseandmouth,andtherewereseverepatchesof bruising all over the body. The claimants’ witnesses tell of a sustained campaign of ill-treatment of the men who were taken into custody, one of whomwasverybadlyinjured,andtheysuggestthatBahaMousawaspicked outforparticularlysavagetreatmentbecauseofthecomplaintshisfatherhad made.ThemenwhowerearrestedhadbeentakenfromthehoteltoaBritish militarybaseinBasrahCitycalledDarulDhyafa”.37 36LosAngelesTimes,NicholasRiccardi,NoJailTimeinDeathofIraqiGeneral,24January2006. Seealso:AmnestyInternational:UnitedStatesofAmerica:Guantanamoandbeyond:Thecontinuing pursuitofuncheckedexecutivepower,13May2005,AIIndex:AMR51/063/205,pages110-115. 37[2005]EWCACiv1609,seeparas28andfollowing,inLordsJusticeBrooke’sjudgment.TheAl- SkeinicasewasoneofsixtestcasesbroughtbythefamiliesofIraqicivilianswhoareallegedtohave beentorturedorkilledbyUKsoldiersduringtheUKoccupationofSouth-EasternIraq.Inthesame judgment,theCourtofAppealofEnglandandWalesalsoruledthattheUKHumanRightsAct1998 (HRA)isinprinciplecapableofhavingextra-territorialeffectwhenapersonfallswithinthe “jurisdiction”oftheUKundertheEuropeanConventionfortheProtectionofHumanRightsand

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq 15

Court-martialproceedingshavesincebeeninstituted,althoughtrialshaveyet totakeplace,againstsevenmilitarypersonnel,includingthecommandingofficerwho has been charged with negligent performance of duty. Three of the seven military personnelhavebeenchargedwith“inhumantreatment”ofthedetainee.38 In another case, UK Attorney General Lord Goldsmith announced in July 2005thatfourUKsoldierswouldstandtrialinconnectionwiththedeathofAhmed JaberKarim‘Ali,oneoffourmendetainedonsuspicionoflootinginMay2003in Basra. It has been alleged that UK servicemen, allegedly punched and kicked the suspects and then forced them into the Shat Al-Basra canal, causing Ahmed Jaber Karim‘Alitodrown.39 Inafurthercase,acourtmartialconvictedthreeUKsoldiersinFebruary2005 ofabusingdetainees inMay2003atCampBreadbasket,nearBasra,andsentenced themtobetween140daysandtwoyears’imprisonment.40 MembersoftheMNF have immunity fromprosecutionunderIraqicriminal andcivillaw,asstipulatedbyUnitedNations(UN)SecurityCouncilresolution1546 (2004) with its attached exchange of letters between the Iraqi and US authorities. Investigations into human rights violations committed by the MNF in Iraq and the bringing to justice of thoseresponsible, therefore, are entirely in the hands of their own national authorities. Amnesty International is concerned that military investigationsandprosecutionsinconnectionwithhumanrightsviolationscommitted bymembersoftheMNFmaynotmeetinternationalstandardsofimpartiality. Amnesty International considers that the torture and ill-treatment to which prisonersinAbuGhraibprisonandotherplacesofdetentioncontrolledbyoccupying

FundamentalFreedoms(ECHR).Thus,theCourtheldthattheHRAcanapplytoUKauthorities outsidetheterritoryofUK.TheCourtalsoheldthatthelowercourthadbeenwrongtodrawthelineat “quasi-territorial”premisessuchasaUK-runprisoninIraq,sincetheECHRconceptofjurisdiction wasinprinciplebroaderthanthat.Forexample,itcouldextendtoapersonwhowasunderarrestatan Iraqihotel.However,theCourtheldthatthenotionofjurisdictionwasnotbroadenoughtoinclude personswhowereatlibertyandnotyetinthecontrolofUKforces.Finally,theCourtheldthatthatthe systemforinvestigatingdeathsatthehandsofUKarmedforcespersonnelwasseriouslydeficient, includinginitslackofindependencefromthecommandingofficer,anditneededtobescrutinized. 38BBC,UKsoldiersfacewarcrimestrials,20July2005,http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4698251.stm. 39CNN,Britishtriochargedwithwarcrimes,19July2005, http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/07/19/britain.iraq/. 40TheGuardian,AudreyGillan,SoldiersinIraqabusecasesenttoprison,26February2005.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 16 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq

powerswereexposedpriortothehandoverofpoweramountedtowarcrimes.41The organizationcontinuestocallonthegovernmentswhosetroopshavebeeninvolvedin themilitaryoperations42inIraqtoensurethatthereisnoimpunityforanyonefound responsibleforwarcrimes,regardlessofpositionorrank. Withoutchargeortrial–detentionbytheMultinational Force Since the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 tens of thousands of people have been detainedbyforeignforces,mainlytheUSforces,withoutbeingchargedortriedand withouttherighttochallengetheirdetentionbeforeajudicialbody.BetweenAugust 2004andNovember2005anadministrativereviewboard(theCombinedReviewand ReleaseBoard),43composedofrepresentativesoftheMNFandtheIraqigovernment, examined the files of almost 22,000 internees and recommended about 12,000 for releaseandanother10,000forcontinueddetention.44Thevastmajorityof “security internees” - that is those individuals held in connection with the on-going armed conflictwhoareconsideredbytheMNFtobeathreattosecurity-haveneverbeen tried. According to statistical data compiled by the MNF, by the end of November 2005,theCentralCriminalCourtofIraqhadtried1,301allegedinsurgents.45 In reference to the situation of detainees held by the MNF in Iraq, the UN Secretary General Kofi Annan stated in his report to the Security Council in June 2005:“Oneofthemajorhumanrightschallengesremainsthedetentionofthousands of persons without due process (…).Prolonged detention without access to lawyers and courts is prohibited under international law, including during states of

41TortureorinhumantreatmentisagravebreachesoftheFourthGenevaConventionaccordingto Article147.Gravebreachesarewarcrimesaccordingtointernationallaw,asreflectedintheRome StatuteoftheInternationalCriminalCourt(Article8(2-ii)).TheGenevaConventionswerefully applicableinIraqduringtheoccupationuntilthehandoverofpoweron28June2004.Crueltreatment andtortureinnon-internationalarmedconflictarealsowarcrimesundertheRomeStatuteofthe InternationalCriminalCourt(ICC). 42TheUNandtheICRChavebothdeclaredthattheoccupationofIraqendedon28June2004, followingthehad-overofpowerfromtheCoalitionProvisionalAuthority(CPA)totheInterimIraqi Government. 43Seesectiontitled‘ReviewforinterneesheldbytheUSforces’forfurtherdetail. 44MultinationalForce,CombinedReviewandReleaseBoard,LastUpdateon28November2005, http://www.mnf-iraq.com/TF134/Release.htm. 45MultinationalForce,CentralCriminalCourt,LastUpdateon28November2005,http://www.mnf- iraq.com/TF134/Trials.htm

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq 17

emergency”.46TheUSrejectedtheaccusationsclaimingthatalldetaineeshadaccess toduelegalprocessandtheirrightsundertheGenevaConventions.47 The UN Assistance Mission for Iraq has also expressed concern about the situation of people interned by the MNF in Iraq, commenting in its Human Rights ReportofSeptember2005:“Massdetentionsofpersonswithoutwarrantscontinueto beused in militaryoperations by MNF-I.Reportsofarbitraryarrestanddetention continue to be reported to the Human Rights Office. There is an urgent need to provide remedy to lengthy internment for reasons of security without adequate judicialoversight”.48 Most“securityinternees”areheldatfourdetentionfacilitiesunderUScontrol, namelyCampBuccanearBasra,AbuGhraibprison49inBaghdad,CampCropperin Baghdad and Fort Suse near Suleimaniya, which started operating at the end of October2005.50Inaddition,USforcesholddetaineestemporarilyinvariousbrigade and division internment facilities throughout the country. 51 A small number of “securityinternees”areheldinthecustodyofUKforcesatthedetentionfacilityof Shu’aiba Camp, near Basra. According to the UK’s Foreign and Commonwealth Office,attheendofOctober2005,theUKforcesheld33securityinternees,noneof whomwerewomenorchildren,intheirdetentionfacilityatal-Shu’aiba.52 Atthebeginningof2004theCoalitionProvisional Authority(CPA)headed by US ambassador Paul Bremer published a list of about 8,500 detainees on the Internet.However,thetruefigureofthosethenbeingheldwasbelievedtobemuch higher.53WhentheCPAwasdisbandedinJune2004,thenumberofdetaineesheldby the Coalition Forces had fallen to about 6,400 persons, according to a US military 46UNDoc.S/2005/373,UNSecurityCouncil,ReportoftheSecretary-Generalpursuanttoparagraph 30ofresolution1546(2004),7June2005,para.72. 47Reuters,USrejectsUNcritiqueofitsIraqprisonerpolicy,9July2005. 48UnitedNationsAssistanceMissionforIraq(UNAMI):HumanRightsReport,1July–31August 2005,September2005,http://www.uniraq.org/aboutus/HR.asp 49OnepartofAbuGhraibPrisonisunderthecontroloftheUSforcesandanotherbyIraqiauthorities. 50MultinationalForce,NewTheaterInternmentFacilityopensinnorthernIraq,30October2005, http://www.mnf-iraq.com/Releases/Oct/051030b.htm. 51Forexample,attheendofNovember2005theUSforceswereholdinganestimated650detaineesat brigadeanddivisioninternmentfacilities(MultinationalForce,Numberofsecuritydetainees,Last Update28November2005,http://www.mnf-iraq.com/TF134/Numbers.htm). 52SeewebsiteoftheForeignandCommonwealthOffice,visitedinJanuary2006, http://www.fco.gov.uk/servlet/Front?pagename=OpenMarket/Xcelerate/ShowPage&c=Page&cid=1032 786062920. 53Forexample,itappearsthatmanynon-Iraqidetaineesandscoresofso-calledHighValueDetainees- manyofwhomwereheldatthattimealreadyformonths-hadnotbeenrecordedonthatlist.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 18 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq

official.54However,sincethehandoverofpowerthenumberofdetaineesheldbythe MNFhasincreasedsteadily. InNovember2004,GeneralGeoffreyMiller,thenUSheadofIraqidetainee operations, stated that about 8,300 detainees were held by the MNF.55On 1 April 2005,theUSDepartmentofStateestimatedthenumberofdetaineesatabout10,000 persons.56 According to the official website of the MNF, at the end of November 2005 there were more than 14,000 security detainees held in MNF custody, distributedoverthefourmainUScontrolleddetentioncentresasfollows:AbuGhraib prison (4,710 detainees), Camp Bucca (7,365 detainees), Camp Cropper (138 detainees) and FortSuse (1,176 detainees), as well as various military brigade and divisioninternmentfacilities(650detainees).57

LegalbackgroundtodetentionsbytheMultinationalForce Following the US-led invasion in March 2003, Iraq was in a state of international armed conflict. Consequently, persons deprived of their liberty by the occupying forceswereprotected–inadditiontoapplicablehumanrightslaw--byinternational humanitarian law, namely the Third (Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War) or the Fourth (Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian PersonsinTimeofWar)GenevaConventionsof1949.Thedeprivationoflibertyofa personwhichisorderedbytheexecutivepowerwithoutbringingchargesagainstthat person is referred to as administrative detention or internment. The Fourth Geneva Convention, applicable in situations of international armed conflict, states that internment “may be ordered only if the security of the Detaining Power makes it absolutelynecessary”. WiththehandoverofpowerinJune2004the legalsituationchanged;since thenIraqisconsideredtobeinasituationofnon-internationalarmedconflictwiththe MNF and the Iraqi security forces on one side and the insurgents on the other. Therefore, the Geneva Conventions no longer fully apply to persons detained in connectionwiththeongoingarmedconflict.Inthissituation,allpartiesincludingthe MNF, are bound by Article 3 common to the four Geneva Conventions, and by customary rules applicable to non-international armed conflicts, as well as human 54AgenceFrancePress,Coalitiontokeep4,000to5,000prisonersafterIraqhandover,13June2004. 55WashingtonPost,BradleyGraham,OffensivesCreateSurgeofDetainees,27November2004. 56USDepartmentofState:SecondPeriodicReportoftheUnitedStatesofAmericatotheUN CommitteeAgainstTorture,submittedon6May2005. 57MultinationalForce,Numberofsecuritydetainees,LastUpdate28November2005, http://www.mnf-iraq.com/TF134/Numbers.htm.Itappearsthatthesenumbersdonotincludethe detaineesheldbyUKforces.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq 19

rights law. Article 3 common to the Four Geneva Conventions requires that those placed in detention are treated humanely, though it does not contain detailed provisionsregulatingsuchdetention. Since the handover of power, the MNF refer to UN Security Council Resolution 1546 as providing the legal basis forthe MNF forces to hold people in detentioninIraq.Resolution1546,withitsattachedexchangeoflettersbetween,for theUS,SecretaryofStateColinPowelland,forIraq,PrimeMinister,AyadAllawi, confer on the MNF authority to resort to “internment where this is necessary for imperative reasons of security”. Unfortunately, there is no reference in Resolution 1546 to the legal safeguards that are to apply to arrests, detention or internment carriedoutbyarmedforcesandtroopsfromcountriescontributingtotheMNF.The UKandtheUShavestated,however,thattheirinternmentpoliciesarealsogoverned by Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) Memorandum No. 3 (revised) of June 2004,58whichsetsouttheprocessofarrestanddetentionofcriminalsuspectsaswell asproceduresrelatingto“securityinternees”detainedbymembersoftheMNFafter 28June2004. ThisCPAMemorandum,whichwasrevisedonlyonedaybeforethehandover ofpower,detailstheauthorityoftheMNFtodetainpeopleinIraq.Itelaboratessome procedural details regarding detentions by the MNF and distinguishes between “criminaldetainees”and“securityinternees”.59Withregardtocriminaldetaineesthe documentstipulates:“(…)theMNFshallhavetherighttoapprehendpersonswhoare suspectedofhavingcommittedcriminalactsandarenotconsideredsecurityinternees (hereafter:“criminaldetainees”)whoshallbehandedovertotheIraqiauthoritiesas soonasreasonablypracticable”.60 TheMemorandumestablishedsomebasicrulesforthedetentionof“security internees”, concerning review procedures, access to internees and other aspects of their conditions, and the maximum period of internment of children. 61 CPA MemorandumNo.3providesthatanyonewhoisinternedformorethan72hoursis entitledtohavethedecisiontointernthemreviewedwithinsevendaysandthereafter at intervals of no more than six months. The Memorandum also states that the

58CPAMemorandumNo.3(revised):CriminalProcedures,27June2004[hereafter:CPA MemorandumNo.3]. 59CPAMemorandumNo.3,section5and6. 60CPAMemorandumNo.3,section5. 61CPAMemorandumNo.3,section6.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 20 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq

“operation,conditionandstandardsofanyinternmentfacilityestablishedbytheMNF shallbeinaccordancewithSectionIVoftheFourthGenevaConvention”.62 Procedures set out in the CPA Memorandum and those which have been developed in practice are crucially flawed because they fail to meet international humanrightsstandardsguaranteeingtherightsofdetainees–including,notably,the righttohaveaccesstolegalcounselandtherighttochallengethelawfulnessofthe detentionbeforeacourt. Inadditiontotheprovisionsofinternationalhumanitarianlawrelatedtonon- international armed conflict set out above, human rights law remains applicable to Iraq.TheUS,theUKandIraqareallstatespartiestotheInternationalCovenanton CivilandPoliticalRights(ICCPR),whichprovidesbasicsafeguardsfortheprotection ofdetainees.AsaffirmedbytheUNHumanRightsCommittee(theexpertUNbody responsible for overseeing the implementation of the ICCPR), international humanitarianlawandhumanrightslawfullycomplementoneanotherduringtimesof armed conflict.63 The relevanttreaties governing non-international armed conflict64 donotcontainspecificrulesregardingquestionssuchasforwhatdurationandunder whatprocedures(ProtocolIIexplicitlyaccepts internmentbutdoesnotregulateit), personsmaybeinterned.Itishumanrightslawthatsquarelyaddressesthisquestion. Amnesty International considers the MNF system of security internment in Iraq to be arbitrary - in violation of fundamental human rights. All detainees, includingsecurityinternees,areprotectedbyArticle9oftheICCPR,whichprovides thatno-oneshouldbesubjectedtoarbitrarydetentionandthatdeprivationofliberty mustbebasedongroundsandproceduresestablishedbylaw(para1).Detaineesmust alsohaveaccesstoacourtempoweredtorulewithoutdelayonthelawfulnessoftheir detentionandtoordertheirreleaseifthedetentionisfoundtobeunlawful(para4).65 These requirements apply to “anyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention”andthereforeapplyfullytothoseinternedbytheMNF. 62SectionIVoftheFourthGenevaConventioncontains“Regulationsforthetreatmentofinternees”. 63HumanRightsCommittee,GeneralComment31,NatureoftheGeneralLegalObligationonStates PartiestotheCovenant,U.N.Doc.CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.13(2004),para.11:“…theCovenant appliesalsoinsituationsofarmedconflicttowhichtherulesofinternationalhumanitarianlaware applicable.While,inrespectofcertainCovenantrights,morespecificrulesofinternational humanitarianlawmaybespeciallyrelevantforthepurposesoftheinterpretationofCovenantrights, bothspheresoflawarecomplementary,notmutuallyexclusive.” 64Article3Commontothe1949GenevaConventions,Articles4-6ofAdditionalProtocolIIof1977. 65Article9para.4oftheICCPR:“Anyonewhoisdeprivedofhislibertybyarrestofdetentionshallbe entitledtotakeproceedingsbeforeacourt,inorderthatthatcourtmaydecidewithoutdelayonthe lawfulnessofhisdetentionandorderhisreleaseifthedetentionisnotlawful”.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq 21

TheICCPR(underArticle4)doesallowforderogationofsomeprovisionsof the Covenant during proclaimed states of emergency, including at a time of armed conflict.However,measuresderogatingfromtheCovenantareallowedonlyifandto theextentthatthesituationconstitutesathreattothelifeofthenation.TheHuman Rights Committee has emphasized that “States parties may in no circumstances invoke Article 4 of the Covenant as justification for acting in violation of humanitarianlaworperemptorynormsofinternationallaw,forinstance….through arbitrarydeprivationsofliberty“.66NeithertheUSnortheUKgovernments,however, have taken the steps necessary formally to derogate from any of their obligations under the ICCPR (which derogation requires that governments notify the Human Rights Committee formally of their intention to derogate from relevant ICCPR provisions). At all times, internees must be provided the right to an effective remedy (ICCPR Article3(2)),includinghabeascorpus, sothatacourtmaydecidewithout delayonthelawfulnessofthedetentionandorderreleaseifthedetentionisnotlawful (Article9(4)).67Apersondetainedonsuspicionofcriminalactivitymustbebrought promptlybeforeajudge(ICCPRArticle9(3))andeitherreleasedorprovidedafair trialbeforeanindependentandimpartialtribunalestablishedbylaw(ICCPRArticle 14).

Reviewprocess Jawad M68, an Iraqi national who worked for the US forces at military bases in Baghdad,wasdetainedbyUSforcesinAugust2004.InOctober2004hereceiveda documentfromtheOfficeoftheDeputyCommandingGeneral,DetaineeOperations, MultinationalForce-Iraqwhichinformedhimaboutanupcomingreviewsessionand included the following one-sentence accusation: “Gathering of information on interpretersandemployeeswiththeMultinationalForce”.Nofurtherexplanationor reference to any relevant legislation was provided. He was not charged or tried. Reviewsofhiscasewereconductedbyanadministrativebodybeforewhichhewas not permitted to appear. Following his release from Abu Ghraib prison at the beginningof2005,JawadMtoldAmnestyInternationalthathestilldidnotknowthe 66HumanRightsCommittee,GeneralComment29,StatesofEmergency(article4),U.N.Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.11(2001),para.11. 67 Human Rights Committee, General Comment 29, States of Emergency (Article 4), U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.11(2001),para.16. 68Attheperson’srequestthenameisnotpublishedinthisreport.Thefullnameofthepersonwiththe prisonersequencenumberisknowntoAmnestyInternational.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 22 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq

reasonsforhisinternment.Hesaid:“Itwasuseless.IwasthereforfivemonthsandI knewthatnobodycandoanything.UntilnowIdon’tknowwhytheysentmetothe prisonandwhyIwasreleasedandwhosedecisionthatwas.” ThecaseofJawadMillustratesthewayinwhichmanyinterneesaredetained arbitrarily by the MNF. In violation of international human rights law, tens of thousandsofinterneeshavebeenheldforweeksormonthsandthousandsformore than one year without being charged or tried and with no right to challenge the lawfulness of their detention before a judicial body. They have received no informationregardingthegroundsfortheirdetention,whethertheywill becharged andbroughttotrialor,ifnot,forhowlongtheyarelikelytobedetained. As detailed below, the US and UK have established separate systems for reviewing cases of internees held by their respective forces. Both systems have in common that they fail to meet international human rights law and standards - including the requirement for court oversight of the detention. Despite the involvement of consultative bodies in the process, the ultimate decision about the releaseorcontinuedinternmentofapersonlieswithmilitarycommanders.

ReviewforinterneesheldbytheUSforces TheMNF’sinternmentprocedureswerecriticisedbyIraqiJusticeMinister‘Abdal- Hussain Shandal in September 2005. Speaking to Reuters news agency, he complained:“Nocitizenshouldbearrestedwithoutacourtorder(…)Thereisabuse [ofhumanrights]duetodetentions,whichareoverseenbytheMultinational Force (MNF)andarenotinthecontroloftheJusticeMinistry”.69 Sincethehandoverofpowerinmid-2004,however,theIraqiauthoritieshave participated in reviewing cases of internees held by the MNF in line with changes announcedbytheUSDepartmentofDefenseinAugust2004.70 Afterthehandover,abodycalledtheCombinedReviewandReleaseBoard (CRRB) was established, comprising two representatives each from the Iraqi ministries of Justice, the Interior and Human Rights and three MNF officers. This body reviews the cases of internees and makes recommendations regarding their releaseorcontinueddetention–accordingtoHumanRightsMinistryofficialsthese recommendationsaremadebymajorityandnoneoftheboard’smembershasapower 69Reuters,MariamKarounyandAlastairMacdonald,IraqSlamsU.S.Detentions,ImmunityforTroops, 14September2005. 70USDepartmentofDefence,USCentralCommand,NewsRelease,DetaineeReleaseBoardtakeson IraqiPartners,4August2004.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq 23

of veto – but its recommendations are not binding and it is the MNF’s Deputy CommandingGeneralforDetaineeOperationswhodecideswhetherornotadetainee shouldbereleasedafterfirstconsultingIraq’sMinisterofJustice.71 The US government’s 2005 report to the UN Committee against Torture providedthefollowingdescriptionofthedetentionreviewprocess:“Uponcaptureby a detaining unit, a detainee is moved as expeditiously as possible to a theater internmentfacility.Amilitarymagistratereviewsanindividual’sdetentiontoassess whethertocontinuetodetainortoreleasehimorher.Ifdetentioniscontinued,the Combined Review and Release Board assumes the responsibility for subsequently reviewingwhethercontinueddetentionisappropriate.”72 CPAMemorandumNo.3stipulatesthatthereviewwithinsevendaysmustbe followedbyfurtherreviewsatintervalsofnomorethansixmonths.Inpractice,these appear generally to be respected with some reviews being done at more frequent intervals.Inconsideringcases,theCRRBhasthreepossibleoptionstorecommend: unconditional release, release with a suitable guarantor from the detainee’s community, or continued internment. Neither the internee nor his or her legal counselarepermittedtobepresentduringthesecasereviews,thoughinterneeshave reportedlybeenencouragedtomakesubmissionstotheCRRBinwriting. Between the establishment of the CRRB in August 2004 and 28 November 2005, the CRRB reviewed the files of 21,995 internees, of whom 4,426 were recommendedforunconditionalrelease,7,626forreleasewithaguarantorand9,903 forcontinuedinternment.73AccordingtotheUSDepartmentofDefense,theCRRB when making a decision is to take into consideration the “circumstances of the detainee’scapture,thelengthofdetentionpriortoreview,thelevelofcooperationby thedetainee,andthedetainee’spotential forfurtheractsofanti-Iraqi misconductif released”.74 71OverthelastyearAmnestyInternationaldelegatesmetwithrepresentativesoftheIraqiHuman RightsMinistryonseveraloccasions.On13November2005adelegateofAmnestyInternationalmet withtheActingHumanRightsMinisterNerminOthmaninAmman. 72SecondPeriodicReportoftheUSAtotheCommitteeAgainstTorture,UNDoc.CAT/C/48/Add.3, 29June2005,Annex1,PartTwo. 73MultinationalForce,CombinedReviewandReleaseBoard,LastUpdateon28November2005, http://www.mnf-iraq.com/TF134/Release.htm.Asof28November2005theexactnumbersof revieweddetaineefileswas21,995ofwhich12,052wererecommendedforunconditionalor conditionalrelease. 74USDepartmentofDefence,USCentralCommand,NewsRelease,DetaineeReleaseBoardtakeson IraqiPartners,4August2004.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 24 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq

InitsreporttotheUNCommitteeagainstTorture,theUSgovernmentreferred tothepracticeofhavingamilitarymagistrateconducttheinitialreviewwithinseven days, but such reviews appear generally to be paper-based reviews, in which the internee’sfileisconsideredwithouthisbeingpresent. In one case that received considerable media attention, however, a security interneewaspermittedtobepresentduringthereviewofhisdetentionconductedby USmilitaryofficers.Butthereviewprocedurefollowedinthecaseof44-year-oldUS national Cyrus Kar,afilmmaker,differed from thenormalprocedure.Karandhis cameraman,FarshidFaraji,weredetainedon17May2005byIraqisecurityforces whileridingataxiinBaghdad.WhilstFarshidFarajiwasheldforalmosttwomonths indetentionbytheIraqiauthorities,CyrusKarwashandedovertotheUSforces.Kar wasdeniedaccesstoalawyerduringhisdetentionbuton4July2005hewasbrought beforeareviewboardcomposedofthreeUSmilitaryofficers.Hewasreleasedon10 July,afterwhichhecommented:“Icouldn’thavemorerespectfortherank-and-file soldiers, but the system is broken. When an Iraqi is detained there, he comes out angryandwantingpayback”.75

ReviewforinterneesheldbytheUKforces CasesofdetaineesinternedbyUKforcesarereviewedbytheDivisionalInternment Review Committee (DIRC), which is composed entirely of MNF officials. Its members are the UK military chief of staff, another senior officer, the chief legal officerandanotherlegalofficerandthechiefpoliticaladvisor.76However,thefinal decisionastowhetheradetaineeshouldcontinuetobeinternedorreleasedrestswith theGoverningOfficerCommanding(GOC). The initial review has to take place within 48 hours 77 of internment and thereafter monthly. 78 An interned person may address written submissions to the DIRC,butneithertheinterneenorhisorherlegalrepresentativemaybepresentwhen theDIRCreviewstheinternee’scase. The GOC informs internees in writing, stating the reasons, when it is determinedthattheyshouldcontinuetobeinterned.However,AmnestyInternational 75NewYorkTimes,TimGolden,HowaTriptoFilminIraqEndedinaMilitaryJailCell,24July 2005. 76ForeignandCommonwealthOffice,HumanRights–AnnualReport2005,July2005,page63, http://www.fco.gov.uk/servlet/Front?pagename=OpenMarket/Xcelerate/ShowPage&c=Page&cid=1119 526503628. 77ThisisshorterthanthesevendaysperiodspecifiedbytheCPAMemorandumNo.3. 78ForeignandCommonwealthOffice,HumanRights–AnnualReport2005,July2005,page64.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq 25

is concerned that even after months of internment the MNF continues to hold interneeswithoutprovidingthemortheirlegalcounselwithsubstantiveevidenceto justifytheirdetention. For example, a 48-old dual national with UK and Iraqi citizenship, Hillal ‘AbdulRazzaq‘Alial-Jedda,hasbeendetainedsincehisarreston10October2004 inBaghdad.HefiledacaseagainsttheUKSecretaryofStateforDefencechallenging hisinternmentinIraqwhichwasdismissedbytheHighCourtofEnglandandWales on12August2005.However,thecourtnotedthat“Althoughdetainedforimperative reasons of security, the claimant has not been charged with any offence; and the SecretaryofStateacknowledgesthat,asmattersstand,thereis insufficientmaterial availablewhichcouldbeusedincourttosupportcriminalchargesagainsthim.The claimantisthereforedetainedsimplyonapreventivebasis.”79Inmid-February2006, Hillal‘AbdulRazzaq‘Alial-JeddacontinuedtobeheldwithoutchargeortrialbyUK forces.InJanuary2006,anappealagainstthedecisionoftheHighCourtwasheardin the Courtof Appeal of England and Wales but judgment was still awaited in mid- February.

Lengthofinternment DifferentprovisionsexistfordetaineesheldbytheMNFsincebeforethemid-2004 transfer of power to a new Iraqi government and those detained since that time. Detaineesinthefirstcategorymaybeheldindefinitely,whereasthosedetainedand internedsince30June2004,accordingtoCPAMemorandumNo.3,“mustbeeither releasedfrominternmentortransferredtotheIraqicriminaljurisdictionnolaterthan 18monthsfromthedateofinductionintoanMNFinternmentfacility.” Thisrequirementofreleaseafter18monthsisnotabsolute,however.Eventhe detaineesinternedafterthehandovercanbeheldformoreprolongedperiodsatthe approvaloftheJointDetentionCommittee(JDC).Thisrequiresthatanapplicationfor further internment is made to the JDC two months before the expiry of the initial internment periodof 18 months; if the JDC sanctions continued internment it must specifytheduration.AccordingtotheHumanRightsAnnualReport2005oftheUK ForeignandCommonwealthOffice,publishedinJuly2005,theJDChadstilltobe convenedforUK-heldinterneesbecausenoneofthembythenhadbeenheldforas

79R(ontheapplicationofAl-Jedda)vSecretaryofStateforDefence,para.11ofMrJusticeMoses’s judgment,[2005]EWHC1809.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 26 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq

long as 18 months. 80 In mid-February 2006 an application for the extension of internmentbeyond18monthsof266detaineeshadbeenmadetotheJDC.81 AmnestyInternationalisconcernedabouthundredsofsecurityinterneeswho havebeendetainedbytheMNFsincebeforethehandoverofpowerandmaybeheld indefinitely. In a letter to Amnesty International dated 19 February 2006, Major General Gardner, commander of Task Force 134, which is in charge of MNF detentionoperations,statedthatattheendof2005thenumberofsecurityinternees held for morethan 18 months was estimatedtobe 751.82The letter confirmed that approvalbytheJDCtokeepaninterneebeyond18monthsisonlyrequiredforthose “interneesdetainedafter30June2004”.83 Amnesty International considers indefinite internment as practiced by the MNFwithregardtosecurityinterneesheldsincebeforethehandoverofpowertobe unlawful.AccordingtoTheUNWorkingGrouponArbitraryDetentions(established by the UN Commission on Human Rights): “With regard to derogations that are unlawful and inconsistent with States’ obligations under international law, the Working Group reaffirms that the fight against terrorism may undeniably require specific limits on certain guarantees, including those concerning detention and the right to a fair trial. It nevertheless points out that under any circumstances, and whateverthethreat,therearerightswhichcannotbederogatedfrom,thatinnoevent mayanarrestbasedonemergencylegislationlastindefinitely,anditisparticularly important that measures adopted in states of emergency should be strictly commensuratewiththeextentofthedangerinvoked.”84 AmnestyInternationalalsoconsidersthatindefiniteinternmentmayconstitute a violation of the prohibition on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Any deprivation of liberty, even when carried out in accordance with international humanitarian law, inevitably causes some stress or a degreeofmentalsufferingtotheinterneeandhisorherfamily,althoughthiswillnot 80ForeignandCommonwealthOffice,HumanRights-AnnualReport2005,July2005,page63. AccordingtothereportaJDCforUK-heldsecurityinterneeswouldcompriseBritishrepresentativesat Ambassadororequivalentlevel. 81Letterof19February2006toAmnestyInternationalbyMajorGeneralGardner,CommandingMNF TaskForce134. 82Allsecurityinterneeswhohadbeenheldformorethan18monthsbytheendof2005musthave beenplacedininternmentbeforethehandoverofpower. 83Letterof19February2006toAmnestyInternationalbyMajorGeneralGardner,CommandingMNF TaskForce134. 84ReportoftheWorkingGrouponArbitraryDetention,UNDoc.E/CN.4/2004/3,15December2003, para.60.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq 27

automatically render the deprivation unlawful. However, Amnesty International is concernedthatthe“securityinternees”heldbytheMNF,arebeingdeprivedoftheir liberty in circumstances that cause unnecessary suffering, such as indefinite and incommunicadodetention,thatcannotbejustifiedasanunavoidablepartofa“lawful sanction”. 85 The UN Committee against Torture has found that administrative detentionbyapartytoanarmedconflictmayconstitutecruel,inhumanordegrading treatment or punishment, based inter alia on its excessive length86In addition, the Human Rights Committee has referred to prolonged, indefinite “administrative detention”asincompatiblewithArticle7oftheICCPR,whichprohibits,amongother things,tortureandcruel,inhumanordegradingtreatmentorpunishment.87 Indefinitedetentioncausesuncertaintyandmentalanguishformanyinternees inIraq-someofwhomhavebeenheldformorethantwoyears.Manyrelativesof detainees with whom Amnesty International has been in regular contact have expressedtheirdespair.Forexample,inJanuary 2006theorganizationreceivedthe following email communication sent by a man whose brother had been held for almosttwoyears: “Thankyouforyoure-mailandyourconcernaboutmybrother.Thereisno change and no development in the case. And itis very difficult to visit him becauseheisnowinBasra.AndtherearealotofproblemsfacingSunniswho gotoBasrainordertovisittheirrelatives.Besidesitisverydifficulttoget permissionfrom American soldiers to visit him.Andthere isn’t any charge. Nowwelostthehopetogethimagain.” Thenumberoflong-termdetaineeshasreportedlyincreasedsinceSeptember 2005. According tothe Iraqi Human Rights Ministry, on 28 September 2005 there were1,443detaineesheld byMNF formorethanone year.However,accordingto figuresprovidedbyUSofficials,inearlyNovember2005amongthenearly13,900 85Reportsinrecentyearsonpersonsheldinindefinitedetentioninthecontextofthe“waronterror” have shown the severe psychological effects of such detention. For instance, in October 2004, in a reportonthementalhealthofdetaineesheldatthetimeindefinitelyinBelmarshhighsecurityprison, intheUK,undertheAnti-TerrorismCrimeandSecurityAct(2001),eminentpsychiatristsconcluded thatthedetaineeshadbecomeseriouslyclinicallydepressedandweresufferingfromanxiety,someof them becoming psychotic as aresult of their indefinite detention. (Professor Ian Robbins, Dr James MacKeith, Professor Michael Kopelman, Dr Clive Meux, Dr Sumi Ratnam, Dr Richard Taylor, Dr Sophie Davison and Dr David Somekh, The Psychiatric Problems of Detainees under the 2001 AntiterrorismCrimeandSecurityAct,13October2004, http://www.statewatch.org/news/2004/nov/belmarsh-mh.pdf). 86ReportoftheCommitteeagainstTorture,UNDoc.A/53/44.16September1998,para.283(b). 87HumanRightsCommittee,AnnualReport,vol.1(1998),UNDoc.A/53/40,para.317.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 28 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq

detaineesheld bytheMNFthereweresome3,800whohadbythenbeenheld for morethanoneyearandmorethan200whohadbeenheldformorethantwoyears.88 AmnestyInternationalknowsofinterneeswhoatthebeginningof2006had beenheldformorethantwoyearswithouthavingbeenchargedortried.Forexample, Kamal Muhammad ‘Abdullah al-Jibouri, a 43-year-old former soldier married with11children,continuedtobeheldinearlyFebruary2006,aftersometwoyearsin detentionwithoutchargeortrial.Hewasdetainedon5February2004byUStroops intheal-KhusumvillageoftheSalaheddingovernorate.HewasheldatAbuGhraib prison initially, buttransferredtoCampBucca,nearBasra,inMay2005.Sincehis transfer,ithasbecomeparticularlydifficultforhisrelativestovisithim.Tworelatives ofKamalMuhammad‘Abdullahal-Jibouri,bothagedabout40,werealsodetainedby US troops on 5 February 2004 in al-Khusum village. At least one of the two was reportedlytransferredattheendof2005toFortSuse,nearSuleimaniyainnorthern Iraq.AsofFebruary2006,bothmen, like Kamal Muhammad‘Abdullahal-Jibouri, continuedtobeheldwithoutchargeortrial.

Treatmentofinternees AlthoughtheUSauthoritiesintroducedvariousmeasurestosafeguardprisonersafter theAbuGhraibprisonscandal,therecontinuetobereportsoftortureorill-treatment ofdetaineesbyUStroops.InSeptember2005severalmembersoftheUSNational Guard’s184thInfantryRegimentweresentencedtoprisontermsinconnectionwith torture or ill-treatment of Iraqis who had reportedly been detained in March 2005 followinganattackonapowerplantnearBaghdad.89Accordingtomediareportsthe abuse involved the use of an electro-shock gun on handcuffed and blindfolded detainees. 90The Los Angeles Times referred to a member of the battalion having reportedthat“thestungunwasusedonatleastoneman’stesticles”.91 The abuse was investigated after a soldier who was not involved in the mistreatmentdiscoveredfilmfootageshowingpartsoftheabuseonalaptopcomputer. At least twelve soldiers from the National Guard’s 184th Infantry Regiment were

88AssociatedPress,KatherineShrader:UShasdetained83,000inwaronterror,16November2005. 89TheLosAngelesTimesinitiallyreportedthattheincidentoccurredinJune2005(LosAngeles Times,ScottGoldandRoneTempest,ArmyProbesGuardUnit,27July2005),butinalaterreportthe newspaperreferredtoMarch2005(LosAngelesTimes,ScottGoldandRoneTempest:MoreTumult BesetsGuardUnitinIraq,15October2005). 90AssociatedPress,JeremiahMarquez,CaliforniaGuardsergeantgetsyearinIraqdetaineeabuse case,10September2005. 91LosAngelesTimes,ScottGoldandRoneTempest:MoreTumultbesetsGuardUnitinIraq,15 October2005.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq 29

charged with misconduct “relating to abuse and maltreatment of detainees”. Three sergeants were sentenced to between five and twelve months of imprisonment and fourothersoldiersweresentencedtohardlabour.92 Inanotherincident,fivesoldiersfromthe75thRangerRegimentwerecharged beforeacourtmartialinconnectionwithallegationsofdetaineeabuse.Thecasearose fromanincidenton7September2005whenthreedetaineeswereallegedlypunched andkicked bythe fiveUSsoldiersastheywereawaiting movementtoadetention facility.93On 21 December 2005 it was announced that the five soldiers had been sentenced to be confined for periods ranging from 30 days to six months and reductionsinrank.94 Amnesty International has noted that in the above cases, US officials have apparentlytakenswiftactiontoinvestigatetheallegationsofabuseandtoprosecute the perpetrators. However, given that torture or ill-treatment have continued, the organizationisconcernedthatinsufficientsafeguardshavebeenputinplaceinorder toprotectdetaineesfromtherecurrenceofabuse. Amnesty International has interviewed former detainees and relatives of detaineesheldbytheMNFabouttreatmentofdetaineesafterthehandoverofpower inJune2004.Inonereportedincidentanelectro-shockgun(taser)wasusedagainst detainees incircumstanceswhich violate international humanrights lawprohibiting tortureorill-treatment.Accordingtoaneye-witnessinNovember2005aUSguardat CampBuccausedataseragainsttwodetaineeswhiletheywerebeingtransferredina vehicletoamedicalappointmentwithinthedetention facility,shockingoneonthe armandtheotheronhisabdomen. Electro-shockweaponshavebeendevelopedasanon-lethalforceoptiontobe usedtocontroldangerousorcombativeindividuals.AmnestyInternationalconsiders thatelectro-shockweaponsareinherentlyopentoabuseastheycaninflictseverepain withoutleavingsubstantialmarks,andcanfurtherbeusedtoinflictrepeatedshocks. Under CPA Memorandum No. 3, the MNF was required to ensure that conditions and standards in all of its internment facilities satisfy Section IV of the

92LosAngelesTimes,ScottGoldandRoneTempest:MoreTumultbesetsGuardUnitinIraq,15 October2005. 93MultinationalForce,USsoldierschargedwithabuse,7November2005,http://www.mnf- iraq.com/Releases/Nov/051107h.htm. 94TheAssociatedPress,FiveUSsoldierssentenced,20December2005.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 30 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq

FourthGenevaConvention,95whichsetsoutstandardsforthetreatmentofdetainees, includinginrelationtofood,hygieneandtheprovisionofmedicalattention,aswell ascontactwiththeoutsideworldandpenalanddisciplinarysanctions.96 Article119oftheFourthGenevaConventionprovidesthatinterneesmaynot bepunishedotherthanbyfines,discontinuanceofprivileges,fatigueduties–which mayonlybe“inconnectionwiththemaintenanceoftheplaceofinternment”andnot exceedtwohoursdaily-andconfinement.Article119furtherprovides:“Innocase shalldisciplinarypenaltiesbeinhuman,brutalordangerousforthehealthofinternees. Accountshallbetakenoftheinternee’sage,sexandstateofhealth.” Despitethis,formerinterneeshaveallegedthatdisciplinaryorpenalsanctions havebeenusedwhichbreachtheaboveprovisionsoftheFourthGenevaConvention and appear also to constitute a violation of international human rights treaties prohibitingtortureorill-treatment.Inparticular,interneesatCampBuccaarealleged tohavebeenexposeddeliberatelytoextremesofbothheatandcold,bybeingmadeto wait for hours in the heatof the sun while their accommodation was searched and forciblyshoweredwithcoldwaterandexposedtocoldairconditioners. AmnestyInternationalhaspreviouslyexpressedconcerntotheUSauthorities regardingtheiruseofarestraintchairfordetaineesinIraq.On28October2005,John MooreofGettyImagesphotographedanindividual–reportedlyajuveniledetainedin the maximum security section of Abu Ghraib prison - strapped into a four-point restraintchair.USArmymilitarypolicereportedlysaidthathewasbeing“punished fordisrespectingthem”andwouldremainfortwohoursinthechair“aspunishment”. Thephotographshowedthedetaineetightlyimmobilized.Hehadstrapsacross hischestandhiswristsandankleswerebound,withhislegsbentattheknee,andhis headwasthrownback.Suchapositionwouldappeartocarryasignificanthealthrisk aswellascausediscomfortandpain.Prolongedimmobilizationinrestraintsisknown to carry a risk of blood clots or asphyxia. On 15 December 2005, Amnesty International wrotetothe MNF Task Force 134, which is responsible for Detainee Operations in Iraq, stating that the organization would “consider the manner of restraintshowntoamounttocruel,inhumanordegradingtreatmentandinviolation oftheUS’sobligationsunderinternationalhumanrightstreaties”. 95AlthoughtheFourthGenevaConventionnolongerappliestothesituationofIraq,theMNFhave referredtoitsstandards.IntheletterbyColinPowellattachedtoSecurityCouncilResolution1546,it isstatedthat“theforcesthatmakeuptheMNFareandwillremaincommittedatalltimestoact consistentlywiththeirobligationsunderthelawofarmedconflict,includingtheGenevaConventions.” 96CPAMemorandumNo.3,sections6,para4.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq 31

Inaletterof17January2006,MajorGeneralJohnD.Gardner,commanderof MNFTaskForce134,respondedtoAmnestyInternationalstatingthat“inaccordance with US Army policy, restraint cannot be used as a form of punishment”. 97 He continued that a restraint chair may be used in order to gain control of a violent detainee.However,AmnestyInternationalwasinformedthattheincidentwasbeing investigated and that policies concerning the use of the restraint chair were under review.Theuseoftherestraintchairhasbeensuspendeduntiltheconclusionsofthis review.

Accesstotheoutsideworld CPA Memorandum No. 3 is deficient in several respects insofar as the question of accesstodetaineesisconcerned.Inparticular,whileitprovidesfortheICRCtohave accesstodetaineesitqualifiesthis,statingthataccessbytheICRCcanbedenied“for reasonsofimperativenecessityasanexceptionalandtemporarymeasure”.98 TherearenoregulationsspelledoutintheMemorandumregardinginternees’ rightofaccesstorelativesorlegalcounsel.Itstatesthattheprovisionsofsection4of theFourthGenevaConventionapply,whichincludesomereferencetocontactwith relativesandlegalcounsel,butitmakesnoreferencetootherinternationalstandards relatingtotherightsofdetainees,suchasTheBodyofPrinciplesfortheProtectionof AllPersonsunderAnyFormofDetentionorImprisonment,andtheDeclarationon theProtectionofAllPersonsFromEnforcedDisappearance. Amnesty International is concerned that the MNF’s failure to guarantee detainees’accesstotheoutsideworld,includingtotheirfamiliesandtolegalcounsel, hasbeenacontributory factorfacilitatingtortureand ill-treatmentandotherhuman rights abuses of detainees. Such denial of access poses a continuing risk of further suchabuses.99

97Letterof17January2006toAmnestyInternationalbyMajorGeneralGardner,CommandingMNF TaskForce134. 98CPAMemorandumNo.3,section6,para8.TheMemorandumfurtherprovidesfortheIraqiPrisons andDetaineeOmbudsmantohaveaccessto“securityinternees”butsuchaccessmayalsobedenied “forreasonsofimperativenecessityasanexceptionalandtemporarymeasure”(CPAMemorandumNo. 3,section6,para8). 99SeealsosectionaboveonTreatmentofdetainees.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 32 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq

Visitsbyrelatives DuringthefirstweeksafterarrestdetaineesheldbyUSforcesoftheMNFhaveno access totheir families or legal counsel. According tothe Detainee visitation rules and guidelines issued by the US military in July 2005, security internees are not entitledtoreceivevisitsduringthefirst60daysofinternment.100 US forces have imposed these restrictions also in high profile cases. For example,AliOmarIbrahimAl-Mashhadani,a36-year-oldcameramanforReuters newsagency,wasarrestedon8August2005inRamadibyUSforcesafterasearchof his house. Reuters Global Managing Editor Director, David Schlesinger, protested thedecisiontodetainthecameramanwithoutanychargesandtherestrictionsonhis accesstotheoutsideworld:“Iamshockedandappalledthatsuchdecisioncouldbe taken without his having access to legal counsel of his choosing, his family or his employers.”101Despite this protest, Ali Omar Ibrahim Al-Mashhadani could not be visitedbeforetheexpiryofthe60dayslimit.Hisfamilyvisitedhimforthefirsttime on7October2005atAbuGhraibprison.HewastransferredtoCampBucca,near Basra, the same day. He was released in mid-January 2006 without having been chargedortried. InterneesheldbytheUKforceshavealsocomplainedaboutdelayedaccessto theoutsideworld.Hillal‘AbdulRazzaq‘Alial-Jedda,a48-year-olddualnational withUKandIraqicitizenship,102wasarrestedathissister’shouseinBaghdadon10 October 2004 by US troops who were accompanied by Iraqi security forces. He reportedthatduringhisarresthewasbeaten,forcedtothefloor,hoodedandtightly handcuffed,causingpain.AtBaghdadAirporthewashandedovertotheUKforces and transferred to the UK-controlled Shu’aiba Divisional Temporary Detention Facility,nearBasra.Forthefirst28daysofhisdetentionhewasreportedlyheldin solitaryconfinementina smalland badly ventilatedcell.Heclaimsthathis family wasonlyinformedabouthiswhereabouts33daysafterhisdetention.103Accordingto theUKauthorities“[s]tandardoperatingpracticesrequiretheMNFtoinformrelatives ofthedetentionofinterneeswithin24hoursoftheirinternment”.104 100MultinationalForce,Detaineesvisitationrulesandguidelines,7July2005,http://www.mnf- iraq.com/Releases/July/050709a.htm;http://www.mnf-iraq.com/TF134/Visitation.htm. 101Reuters,ReuterscameramanheldinAbuGhraib,31August2005. 102Seealsopreviousreferencetothecaseinsection:ReviewforinterneesheldbyUKforces. 103SeealsoMrJusticeMoses’judgment:“Althoughtheclaimanthasmadesomecomplaintsabouthis initialtreatmentbyUStroopsandaboutaspectsoftheconditionsofhisdetentionandinterrogation, theyarenotinissueinthepresentproceedings.Itisthelawfulnessofthedetentionitselfthatisin issue.”,R(ontheapplicationofAl-Jedda)vSecretaryofStateforDefence,paragraph8,[2005] EWHC1809. 104ForeignandCommonwealthOffice,HumanRights–AnnualReport2005,July2005,page64.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq 33

Some relatives of detainees have told human rights organizations, including AmnestyInternational,thatforweeksormonthstheywerenotabletoestablishthe whereabouts of a detainee. The Christian Peacemaker Teams reported the case of ‘AdnanTalibHassanAl-‘Unaibi,animaminthetownofHilla,whowasdetained byUSforceson1May2004whileattendingapublicmeetingatthepremisesofa local humanrightsorganization.105DuringtheraidUSforcesreportedlykilledtwo people.AfterthedetentionabrotheroftheimamwenttotheIraqiAssistanceCentre (IAC)106in Baghdad to find out his whereabouts.However,the detention was only confirmedattheendofMay2004afterthebrother hadobtained more information from released detainees – including the prisoner’s sequence number. Despite numerous inquiries, relatives were not able to establish ‘Adnan Talib Hassan Al- ‘Unaibi’swhereaboutsforseveralmonths.Theywereonlyallowedtovisithimafter he had been indetention forfive months.Hewaseventuallyreleaseduncharged in September2005. In principle, internees are entitled to four visits per month or one visit per weekaftertheyhavepassedthefirst60daysof detention.However,relativeshave frequently reportedthatthey were not able to conduct visits, because the detention facilitywaslocatedfarawayandtravellinglongdistancesinIraqisunsafe.

Visitsbylegalcounsel Afterthefirst60daysofinternment,interneesareentitledtoreceivevisitsbylegal counsel. Amnesty International has asked numerous relatives of internees, former internees, lawyers and human rights activists about the possibilities of security internees seeking the support of legal counsel. It appears that visits of security detaineesbylegalcounselareextremelyrare.Themainreasonforthisseemstobe thebeliefthatitisfutiletoseeklegalcounselwhenthedetaineewillnotbebrought before a court of law. Former internees and lawyers alike have told Amnesty Internationaltheydidnotbelievethatalawyercouldhavesignificantlyfurtheredthe caseofasecurityinternee.

Visitsbymonitoringbodies Asindicatedearlier,CPAMemorandumNo3inprinciplegrantstheICRCaccessto MNF-held detainees at locations throughout the country. In practice, however, the ICRChasbeenabletovisitonlyalimitednumberoflargerdetentionfacilities,mostly

105http://www.cpt.org/campaigns/adopt/detainee_profiles/documents/AdnanTalibHassanAlOnaibi.doc 106TheIraqiAssistanceCenter(IAC)amilitary-runcenterprovidingservicestoindividualsorNGOs onarangeofissues–includingdetentions.Seehttp://www.iac-baghdad.org.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 34 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq

due to security considerations. According to the ICRC in the period from May to September2005“themaindetention/internmentfacilitiescoveredduringthatperiod wereCampCropper(BaghdadAirport);CampBuccanearthesoutherntownofBasra; andseveraldetentionplacesinKurdistan”.107AccordingtotheMNF,theICRChas 108 “access to all Theater Internment Facilities in thetheatre”. Amnesty International understands from this that the ICRC does not have access to brigade and division internmentfacilitiesoftheMNF–thatis,militarybaseswheredetaineesaremainly heldduringthefirstdaysorweeksoftheirdetention. Therefore,inmanylocationsofdetentionunderMNFcontrol,noindependent body iscurrentlyabletomonitorthetreatmentofdetaineesheld bytheMNF. Yet, visits to places of detention by independent monitoring bodies are an important safeguard for persons deprived of their liberty. Visits enable experts to examine at first hand the conditions of detention and treatment of detainees and to make recommendationsforimprovements.Visitscanhaveadeterrenteffectagainstabuse andprovideanecessarylinkfordetaineeswiththeoutsideworld. AccordingtotheUKauthorities,theICRChas“fullandunrestrictedaccess” toitsdetentionfacilitiesinIraqandtheICRChasdescribedconditionsofinternment as“generallygood”.109 The Iraqi Human Rights Ministry is conducting periodic visits to detention facilities under the control of the MNF. The ministry has opened an office at Abu Ghraibprisonwhich isalso monitoringthesituationof interneesheldbytheMNF. Theministryiscirculatingregularreportsonitsmonitoringactivitiesconcerningthe situationofdetaineesinIraq.AnofficialoftheministrytoldAmnestyInternational that its monitoring includes occasional visits to brigade and division internment facilitiesoftheMNF.110 SeveralUNhumanrightsexpertshavefacedobstaclesintheirattemptstovisit detaineesheldbytheUSforces–includingthoseheldinIraq.Inastatementissued on 18 November 2005, five independent experts of the UN Commision on Human Rights – including the Chairperson-Rapporteurof the Working Groupon Arbitrary

107InternationalCommitteeoftheRedCross(ICRC):Operationalupdate,Iraq:ICRCactivities betweenMayandSeptember2005,30September2005, http://www.icrc.org/Web/Eng/siteeng0.nsf/iwpList322/083F20662037E9A1C12570A40040FCD6. 108MultinationalForce,HumaneTreatmentofDetainees,LastUpdateon28November2005, http://www.mnf-iraq.com/TF134/Humane.htm 109ForeignandCommonwealthOffice,HumanRights–AnnualReport2005,July2005,page64. 110Phoneconversationson4and5February2005.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq 35

Detention and the Special Rapporteur on Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or DegradingTreatmentorPunishment–expressedtheirregretabouttheUSrefusalof terms for a fact finding mission to the US detention facility at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.111Thisstatementfollowedaletterof25June2004andseveralfollow-upletters sent by UN human rights experts to the US authorities requesting to visit “those personsarrested,detainedortriedongroundsofallegedterrorismorotherviolations, in Iraq, , the Guantanamo Bay military base and elsewhere”.112At the timeofwritingnoneofthefiveUNhumanrightsexpertshadbeenabletovisitUS detentionfacilitiesinIraq.

Secretandunacknowledgeddetention TheUShasheldanunknownnumberofpersonsdetainedinIraqwithoutanycontact withtheoutsideworldinviolationofinternationalstandards.Thesesocalled“ghost detainees”werelargelyhiddentopreventtheICRCfromvisitingthem. On17June2004,USDefenseSecretaryDonaldH.Rumsfeldadmittedthatin November2003heorderedmilitaryofficialstodetainaseniormemberofAnsaral- Islam113 without listing him in the prison’s register. This prisoner was reportedly arrestedinlateJuneorearlyJuly2003andwastransferredtoanundisclosedlocation outsideIraq.HewasreturnedtoIraqwherehewasdetainedinsecretuntilMay2004 withoutbeingregisteredorassignedaprisonregisternumber.114 There are indications that persons detained in Iraq have secretly been transferredoutsideIraqforinterrogationbytheCIA.Forexample,Hassan Ghul,a PakistaninationalreportedlydetainedinJanuary2004innorthernIraq,isaccording toHumanRightsWatchpossiblyheldinCIAcustody.115Accordingtoareportinthe Swissnewspaper,DerSonntagsblick,aconfidentialcommunicationoftheEgyptian Foreign Ministry to its embassy in London intercepted by the Swiss secret service, statedthatEgyptianintelligencecouldconfirmthat23IraqiandAfghancitizenshave 111UnitedNationspressrelease,HumanRightsExperts“deeplyregret”UnitedStatesrefusalofterms forfact-findingmissiontoGuantanamo,18November2005.Theotherthreeexpertsforwhomaccess tothedetaineeswasrequestedaretheSpecialRapporteurontheIndependenceofJudgesandLawyers, theSpecialRapporteurontheRightofEveryonetotheEnjoymentoftheHighestAttainableStandard ofPhysicalandMentalHealthandtheSpecialRapporteuronFreedomofReligionorBelief. 112UnitedNationspressrelease,HumanRightsExperts“deeplyregret”UnitedStatesrefusalofterms forfact-findingmissiontoGuantanamo,18November2005. 113Ansaral-IslamisanarmedIslamistgroupbasedinKurdistan,particularlyaroundHalabja.Ithas beenresponsibleforgravehumanrightsabuses,includingthedeliberatekillingofcivilians. 114BBC,RedCrosstostudyghostdetainees,18June2004, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3818883.stm. 115HumanRightsWatch,Listof“GhostPrisoners”PossiblyinCIACustody,30November2005.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 36 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq

been interrogated by US intelligence agents at the military air base Mihael Kogalniceanu in Rumania. The communication further stated that similar interrogationcentresexistedintheUkraine,Kosovo,MacedoniaandBulgaria.116 In at least one incident US officials have tried to cover up the death of an unacknowledgeddetaineeinIraq.Mandelal-JamadiwasdetainedbyUStroopsand placedinAbuGhraibprisonwherehediedon4November2003asanunregistered detainee.DocumentsobtainedbytheAmerican Civil LibertiesUnionundertheUS FreedomofInformationAct,suggestthatMandelal-Jamadidieddueto“bluntforce injuriescomplicatedbycompromisedrespiration”.117 US officials have defended the practice of denying detainees’ access to the ICRC for purposes of “imperative military necessity”.118 Under Article 143 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, ICRC visits to civilian internees may be denied “for reasonsofimperativemilitarynecessity”,but“onlyasanexceptionalandtemporary measure”. In Iraq in January 2004, the US authorities invoked “military necessity” whentheyrefusedtogranttheICRCaccesstoeightdetaineesheld in AbuGhraib. AccordingtotheFayreport119,oneoftheeightdetainees,aSyriannational,wasat thattimeheldinatinydarkcellwithoutwindows,toiletorbedding.Theinhumane treatmentofthisSyriandetainee,facilitatedbytheinvocationof“militarynecessity”, was not limited to solitary confinement in harsh conditions. Around 18 December 2003,hewasabusedandthreatenedwithdogs.AccordingtotheUSmilitary,thereis aphotographofhimkneelingonthefloorwithhishandstiedbehindhisback,while anunmuzzleddogissnarlingafewfeetfromhisface.DuringanICRCvisitinmid- March2004,theorganization’sdelegateswereagaindeniedaccesstohim,andother detainees, on the grounds of “military necessity”. In January and March 2004, the ICRCquestionedthe“exceptionalandtemporary”natureofthedenialofaccess.By the time of its March visit, the Syrian detainee had been held incommunicado and underinterrogationforfourmonths.120 116DerSonntagsblick,SandroBrotzandBeatJost,US-FolterCamps:DerBeweis,8January2006, http://www.blick.ch/sonntagsblick/aktuell/artikel30413. 117AmericanCivilLibertiesUnion,U.S.OperativesKilledDetaineesDuringInterrogationsin AfghanistanandIraq,24October2005. http://www.aclu.org/intlhumanrights/gen/21236prs20051024.html. 118UnitedStatesDepartmentofDefense,DefenseDepartmentRegularBriefing,17June2004, http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/2004/tr20040617-secdef0881.html. 119“FayReport”,AR15-6InvestigationofIntelligenceActivitiesatAbuGhraib,ConductedbyMajor GeneralGeorgeR.FayandLieutenantGeneralAnthonyR.Jones,page66, http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Aug2004/d20040825fay.pdf. 120AmnestyInternational,UnitedStatesofAmerica:Humandignitydenied:Tortureandaccountability inthe‘waronterror’,27October2004,AmnestyIndex:AMR51/145/2004.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq 37

US military investigations have suggested that up to 100 so-called ghost detainees may have been held in US detention facilities in Iraq.121 However, the ChurchreportsummaryofMarch2005statedthat“thepracticeofDOD[Department ofDefense]holding‘ghostdetainees’hasnowceased”.122 Thepracticeofholdingdetainees insecret,with nocontactwiththeoutside world, places the person outside the protection of the law, denying them important safeguards and leaving them vulnerable to torture and ill-treatment. They have no access to lawyers, families or doctors. They are often kept in prolonged arbitrary detentionwithoutchargeortrial.Theyareunabletochallengetheirarrestordetention, whose lawfulness is notassessed byany judgeorsimilarauthority.Theirtreatment andconditionsarenotmonitoredbyanyindependentbody,nationalorinternational. The secrecy of their detention allows the concealment of any further human rights violations they suffer, including tortureor ill-treatment, and allows governments to evadeaccountability. In certain circumstances, when people are held in secret detention and the authoritiesrefusetodisclosetheirfateorwhereabouts,theyhave“disappeared”.This practice,knownasenforceddisappearance,isexpresslyprohibitedunderinternational law.123International law requires that any person deprived of their liberty must be heldinanofficiallyrecognizedplaceofdetention. Enforceddisappearanceviolatestherulesofinternationallawwhichprovide for, among others, the right to recognition as a person before the law, the right to libertyandsecurityofthepersonandtherightnottobesubjectedtotortureorother ill-treatment. It also violates -or constitutes a grave threatto -the rightto life. In certain circumstances, enforced disappearance can also be a crime against humanity.124 Internationalhumanrightsbodieshaveheldthatsecretdetentionandenforced disappearances themselves constitute ill-treatment or torture, in view of the considerable suffering of persons detained without contact with their families or

121WashingtonPost,BradleyGrahamandJoshWhite,GeneralCitesHiddenDetainees,10September 2004. 122http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Mar2005/d20050310exe.pdf. 123Seethe1992UNDeclarationontheProtectionofAllPersonsfromEnforcedDisappearance,and thedraftInternationalConventionfortheProtectionofAllPersonsfromEnforcedDisappearance. 124AmnestyInternational:‘Disappearances’inthe‘waronterror’,3November2005,AIIndex:ACT 40/013/2005.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 38 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq

anyoneelsefromtheoutsideworld,andwithoutknowingwhenoreveniftheywill everbefreedorallowedtoseetheirfamiliesagain. Thesameistrueforthesufferingcausedtofamilymembersof“disappeared” persons.Inanumberofcases, international humanrightsbodieshave heldthatthe authorities’ denial of their right to know what has happened to their relatives has violatedtheprohibitionoftortureandill-treatment.

Internmentofwomenandchildren CPA Memorandum No.3 includes provisions for the internment of children: “Any personundertheageof18internedatanytimeshallinallcasesbereleasednotlater than12monthsaftertheinitialdateofinternment”.125 AccordingtotheUKauthorities,thereare noUKorUSdetention facilities allocated for women or children in Iraq. They further stated that at US detention facilities women and juveniles are segregated from adult males unless they are membersofthesamefamily.126AsofOctober2005UKauthoritieswerenotholding anywomenorchildrenindetention.127 At the end of September 2005 there were about 200 juveniles held by the MNF who were scheduled to be transferred shortly to the jurisdiction of the Iraqi MinistryofLabourandSocialAffairs.128Thenewspaperal-Sharqal-Awsatreported in December 2005 that the Iraqi Judicial Council had appointed a judge to deal specificallywithcasesofdetainedjuvenilesheldbytheMNF.129 AttheendofJanuary2006aUSmilitaryspokesmanannouncedthereleaseof fivewomandetainees,whilefourothersremainedheldbytheUSforces.130

125CPAMemorandumNo.3,section6,para5. 126ForeignandCommonwealthOffice,HumanRights-AnnualReport2005,July2005,page63. 127SeewebsiteoftheForeignandCommonwealthOffice,visitedJanuary2006, http://www.fco.gov.uk/servlet/Front?pagename=OpenMarket/Xcelerate/ShowPage&c=Page&cid=1032 786062920. 128IraqiMinistryofHumanRights,DetentionPlacesandNumbersofDetaineesaccordingto informationprovidedbytheMinistryofHumanRights,28September2005. 129al-Sharqal-Awsat,Majlisal-Qada’al-‘Iraqiyanzurqadayaal-ahdathal-muhtajizinladaal-quwat al-muta’addidaal-jinsiya(TheIraqiJudicialCouncilLooksintoJuvenileCasesundertheControlof theMultinationalForce),23December2004, http://www.aawsat.com/sections.asp?section=4&issue=9887. 130BBC,USreleasesIraqiwomenprisoners,26January2006, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4649714.stm.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq 39

“HighValue”Detainees The vast majority of detainees who were held or continue to be held by the MNF withoutchargeortrialaresocalled“securityinternees”–thatis,personsdetainedin thecontextoftheongoingarmedconflict.Inaddition,USforcescontinuetoholdso- calledhighvaluedetainees–acategorywhichhasmainlybeenusedforpersonswith seniorpositionsunderSaddamHussain’sgovernment.131CPAOrderNo.99refersto aMemorandumofUnderstandingbetweentheMNFandIraqiauthoritiesregarding “thehandlingofHighValueDetainees.”132AmnestyInternationalrequestedacopyof thatdocumentfromtheUSgovernment,buttodatehasnotreceivedthis.133 Atleasttwo“highvalue”detaineeshavediedincustodyundercircumstances suggesting that torture or ill-treatment caused or contributed to their deaths. ‘Abd HamadMawoush,amajorgeneralintheIraqiarmyunderSaddamHussain,diedin USdetentionon26November2003afterhavingasleepingbagforcedoverhishead andbodyandoneofhisinterrogatorssatonhischest.On23January2006,aUScourt martialconvictedaUSarmy interrogatorofhiskillingandsentencedthesoldierto forfeit $6,000 of his salary. 134 Muhammad Mun’im al-Izmerly, a 65-year-old chemicalscientist,wasdetainedinApril2003andtakentoCampCropperwherehe diedinJanuary2004.Anautopsyreportfoundthathe“diedfromasuddenhittohis head”.135 Thegroupof“highvalue”detaineesincludedformerprisonersofwar(POW) who are now standing trial. Some former POWs, including Saddam Hussain, have been referred to the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal136(formerly known as Iraqi Special Tribunal). Although standing before an Iraqi court, Saddam Hussain and

131Itisunclearwhetherornotthiscategoryof“highvaluedetainees”isconfinedtothosewithsenior positionsinSaddamHussain’sgovernment.Thetermhasmainlybeenusedinthecontextof investigationsintotheexistenceofweaponsofmassdestructionsinIraq.ThereportoftheSpecial AdvisortotheDirectorofCentralIntelligenceonIraq’sWeaponsofMassDestructiondefinesa“high value”detaineeasadetaineewhoholdsrelevantknowledgeorinsightduetohisorherseniorposition inthemilitary,security,scientific/technical,orgovernmentalstructuresunderSaddamHussain’s government.(http://www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_wmd_2004/glossary.html). 132CPAOrderNo.99,27June2004,section4. 133LetterofAmnestyInternationaltoDonaldRumsfeld,USSecretaryofDefence,17December2004. 134TheDenverPost,ArthurKane,IraqiGeneralbeatentwodaysbeforedeath,5April2005.Seealso: LosAngelesTimes,NicholasRiccardi,NoJailTimeinDeathofIraqiGeneral,24January2006.For moredetailsonthecaseseesectionabove:ThelegacyoftheAbuGhraibprisonscandal. 135HumanRightsFirst,TwentySevenDetaineeHomicidesinU.S.Custody,19October2005, http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/media/2005_alerts/etn_1019_dic.htm. 136AlsoreferredtoasIraqiHigherTribunal.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 40 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq

severalotherscontinuetobeheldinthecustodyoftheMNFattherequestoftheIraqi authorities. According to MNF Task Force 134, in mid-February 2006 thirteen “high value”detaineescontinuetobeheldwithoutchargeortrial.Theircasesweresaidto be subject to review by the High Value Detainee Special Review Committee, describedasa“U.S.Governmentpanelstaffedbymilitaryandciviliansecurityand intelligencespecialistsqualifiedtoassesssecuritythreat,aswellasbyrepresentatives of the Regime Crimes Liaison office, which acts in support of the Iraqi Higher Tribunal”.137 Earlier,theUSgovernmentstatedinitsreporttotheUNCommitteeAgainst Torture,thatUSforcesinIraqwereholdinga“smallnumberofenemyprisonersof war(EPW)”.138TheseapparentlyincludedpersonswhohadbeendetainedasPOWs between March 2003 and June 2004, and therefore should have been released or chargedattheendoftheoccupationon28June2004. Amnesty International calls on the Iraqi Authorities and the international community to ensure that all persons who have been responsible for human rights violations under the governmentof Saddam Hussain are broughtto justice in trials conformingtointernationalstandards.However,accordingtoAmnestyInternational’s information-nearlythreeyearsafterthedemiseofSaddamHussain’sgovernment- someformerofficialsofthatgovernmentcontinuetobeheldwithoutchargeortrial. Mostofthe“highvalue”detainees–ifnotallofthem–arecurrentlybeing held at Camp Cropper, a detention facility of the US forces near Baghdad Airport. Relativesof“highvalue”detaineeshavereportedrestrictionsonvisits.Accordingtoa formerdetaineeatCampCropper,visitsbyrelativesaregenerallyonlyallowedonce every three months. For example, Huda Salih Mehdi ‘Ammash, theonly female member of the Revolutionary Command Council under Saddam Hussain’s government,wasreportedlypermittedfamilyvisitsononlyfouroccasionsduringher detentionfromMay2003untilNovember2005. In December 2005, several “high value” detainees were released without havingbeenchargedortried.Theyincludedtwowomenscientists,namely(theabove

137Letterof19February2006toAmnestyInternationalbyMajorGeneralGardner,CommandingMNF TaskForce134.TheIraqiHigherTribunaliselsewherereferredtoasSupremeIraqiCriminalTribunal. 138SecondPeriodicReportoftheUSAtotheCommitteeagainstTorture,UNDoc.CAT/C/48/Add.3, 29June2005,Annex1,PartTwo.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq 41

mentioned) Huda Salih Mehdi ‘Ammash and Rihab Rashid Taha. Both had been heldinUSdetentionforabout30months.139 Insufficientsafeguardsfordetainees–nolessons learned? Internationalhumanrightslawcontainssafeguardstoprotectthefundamentalrights of people held in detention – including the right not be subjected to torture or ill- treatment. Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) stipulates: “No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degradingtreatmentofpunishment.” FurtherrightsofdetaineesareguaranteedinArticle9oftheICCPRaccording towhichno-oneshouldbesubjectedtoarbitrarydetention(para1).Inadditionevery detainee must have access to a court empowered to rule without delay on the lawfulnessoftheirdetentionandordertheirreleaseifthedetentionisunlawful(para 4). Iraqandall27countries140whowerecontributing attheendof2005tothe MNFarestatepartiestotheICCPR.Inaddition,all27countriescontributingtothe MNFarestatepartiestotheConventionagainstTortureandOtherCruel,Inhumanor DegradingTreatmentorPunishment(CAT). EventhoughIraqisnotastatepartytotheCAT,theabsoluteprohibitionof tortureandill-treatmentisregardedaspartofcustomary law,bindingonallstates, fromwhichnoderogationisallowedatanytime,evenintimesofemergencyorwar. International humanitarian law, which Iraq is bound to observe, also contains provisions that expressly prohibit torture and ill-treatment during both international andnon-internationalarmedconflicts. Furthermore,Iraqilawprohibitstheuseoftortureandill-treatment.Article35 oftheIraqiConstitutionof2005prohibits“all formsoftorture,mentalorphysical, andinhumantreatment”.Althoughnotfullyconsistentwiththedefinitionoftorture 139NewYorkTimes,JohnF.Burns:24Ex-HusseinOfficialsFreedfromU.S.Custody,20December 2005. 140AccordingtotheUKMinistryofDefenceasof15November2005thefollowingcountrieswere contributingtotheMNF:Albania,Armenia,Australia,Azerbaijan,Bosnia-Herzegovina,Bulgaria, CzechRepublic,Denmark,ElSalvador,Estonia,Georgia,Italy,Japan,Kazakhstan,Latvia,Lithuania, Macedonia,Mongolia,Netherlands,Norway,Poland,Romania,Slovakia,SouthKorea,UK,Ukraine andtheUS(http://www.operations.mod.uk/telic/key.htm.).

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 42 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq

accordingtoCAT,Article127oftheCodeofCriminalProcedurestatesthatitisnot permissible“touseanyillegalmeanstoinfluencetheaccusedtosecurehisstatement. Mistreatment, threatening to harm, inducement, threats, menace, psychological influence, and the use of narcotics, intoxicants and drugs are all considered illegal means.” In fact the Iraqi Penal Code criminalizes the use of torture by any public servant. Article 333 states that “any employee or public servant who tortures, or ordersthetortureofanaccused,witness,orexpertinordertocompelthatpersonto confess to committing a crime, to give a statement or information, to hide certain matters,ortogiveaspecificopinionwillbepunishedbyimprisonmentordetention. Theuseofforceorthreatsisconsideredtobetorture”. Inaddition,Iraqilegislationprovidesforpre-trialdetentionprocedureswhich contributetothesafetyofdetainees. Forexample,Article123ofthe1971Lawon CriminalProcedurecontainsparticularlyimportantprovisionsasitrequiresadetainee tobebroughtbeforeaninvestigatingjudgewithin24hours. However, for many detainees held by the MNF and the Iraq authorities the realityisinstarkcontrasttohumanrightsstandardsasguaranteedunderinternational and Iraqi law. The ongoing practice of US forces and Iraqi authorities to restrict accesstodetaineesandreportsoftortureandill-treatmentofdetainees–inparticular thoseheldbyforcesoftheInteriorMinistry-demonstratethatsufficientsafeguardsto protect detainees have not been put in place. On numerous occasions Amnesty Internationalhasexpresseditsconcernsaboutthisfailureandmaderecommendations tostopandpreventtheviolationsoffundamentalhumanrightsofdetaineesinIraq- including in communications and meetings with representatives of the Iraqi authoritiesandwithrepresentativesofgovernmentscontributingtotheMNFinIraq. AmnestyInternational is concernedthat,asyet,insufficientsafeguards have been put in place, in order to protect detainees from abuse. The organization is particularlyconcernedthatapersontakenintodetentionbytheMNFisnoteligibleto receivevisitsbyrelativesorlegalcounselduringthefirst60daysofdetention.The organization fears that these regulations, which delay the detainees’ access to the outsideworld,significantlyincreasetheriskofdetaineesbeingtorturedorill-treated. Duringtheinitialperioddetaineesareoftenheldinso-calledholdingcentreswithina USmilitarybasis.Underthecurrentcircumstancesindependentbodiesarenotinthe positiontomonitorthetreatmentofdetaineesatsuchlocations.However,evenafter beingtransferredtoadetentioncentreequippedwithfacilitiesforvisitors,detainees

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq 43

are not allowed to receive visits until 60 days have elapsed since the date of their detention.141 Many detainees have been held for weeks in pre-trial detention by the Iraqi authoritieswithoutbeingpresentedtoajudicialbody(thatis,aninvestigatingjudge orcourt)–inviolationofIraqilaw.Theirrightstoreceivevisitsbyfamilymembers andtohaveaccesstodefencecounselfrequentlyhavebeendenied.Manyfamiliesof detaineeshavetowaitanxiouslyfordaysorweeksbeforetheylearnwhereapersonis beingheld. Denialofaccess bydetaineestotheoutsideworldduringthe firstweeksof detentionhasbeenrecognizedbyinternationalhumanrightsbodiesandexpertstobe a major factor in facilitating torture and ill-treatment of detainees. For example, in 1995thethen UN Special RapporteuronTorture emphasized that detainees should have immediate access to the outside world and called for a total ban on incommunicado detention. He stated: “Torture is most frequently practiced during incommunicado detention. Incommunicado detention should be made illegal and personsheldinincommunicadodetentionshouldbereleasedwithoutdelay….Legal provisions should ensure that detainees be given access to legal counsel within 24 hours”.142The Human Rights Committee and the Committee against Torture have alsobothcalledfortheeliminationofincommunicadodetention.143 AmnestyInternational isalsoconcernedthatin many incidentsoftortureor ill-treatmentofdetainees,includingincasesofdeathsincustody,theMNFandIraqi authorities have failed to conduct prompt, thorough and impartial investigations as international standards require. As a consequence of insufficient investigations into allegations of torture and ill-treatment only a limited number of perpetrators have beenbroughttojustice. ItappearsthatatleastsomemembersoftheMNFwhohavebeenconvictedby militarytrialsfortheirinvolvementintortureorill-treatmentofdetaineesmayhave receivedsentencesthatdonotadequatelyreflectthegravityofthese violationsand thattheseproceedingsmaynothaveestablishedthefulltruthorextentofabuse.The organizationcallsontheUS,UKandIraqiauthoritiestoallowinternationalmonitors toconductinvestigationsintopastandongoinghumanrightsviolationsinIraq. 141Seealsosectionabove:Accesstotheoutsideworld. 142UNDoc.E/CN.4/1995/434,para926(d). 143SeetheHumanRightsCommittee’sGeneralCommentNo.20,para.11,andtheCommitteeagainst Torture’sobservationsinUNDoc.A/52/44,referringtoGeorgia,para.121(d);UNDoc.A/53/44, referringtoSpain,para.135;UNDoc.A/54/44,referringtoLibya,para.182(a).

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 44 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq

It appears that in many incidents where Iraqi security forces have been involved in torture or ill-treatment, the Iraqi authorities have never conducted investigations. There have been only rare reports of perpetrators of torture or ill- treatmentbeingbroughttojustice.TheUSDepartmentofStatereferstoonecaseof prosecutionofpoliceofficersinBaghdadwhowereaccusedof“systematicallyraping andtorturingfemaledetainees”.144 Following reports of torture or ill-treatment at detention facilities in al- Jadiriyah district of Baghdad under the control of the Interior Ministry, Iraqi authoritiesannouncedon15November2005thattheyhadlaunchedaninvestigation headedbyDeputyPrimeMinisterRozhNuriShawes.145Areportonthefindingswas expectedwithintwoweeks,butatthebeginningofFebruary2006nofindingshadyet been disclosed. There have been media reports, however, that some of the high- rankingofficerswhowerebelievedtobeinvolvedinthehumanrightsviolationshad fled to neighbouring Iran.146On 5 February 2006, Iraqi Prime Minister Ibrahim al- Ja’farireportedlyestablishedafurthercommitteetoinvestigatecomplaintsfiledwith theIraqiauthoritiesconcerninghumanrightsviolationsallegedlycommittedbyforces of the Iraqi Interior Ministry. 147 This committee’s initial findings are due to be announcedinearlyMarch2006. AmnestyInternationalRecommendations TotheIraqiauthorities Concerningtortureandotherill-treatment

*Declarepubliclythegovernment’stotaloppositiontotortureandothercruel, inhumananddegradingtreatmentorpunishmentandmakecleartoallmembersofthe

144USDepartmentofState,CountryReportsonHumanRightsPractices,Iraq,28February2005, http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2004/41722.htm. 145Al-Jazeera,SuspectedTortureCenterinIraq,16November2005, http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/BFFFC9C0-206D-4821-9CA9-8D0B822E8F93.htm. 146Al-Hayat,BasilMuhammad‘Abdal-WahidTa’ama,al-Amerikunyabhathun‘anmu’taqalatsirriya li-l-dakhiliyabi-musa’idaquwasiyasiya(TheAmericansSearchforSecretDetentionCentreswiththe AssistanceofPoliticalForces),9December2005. 147AgenceFrancePress,Iraqabuseprobefindingsexpectednextmonth,17February2006.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq 45

IraqiPoliceService,theIraqiArmedForces,prisonguardsandmembersofother securityagenciesthattortureandotherill-treatmentwillneverbetolerated.

*Ensurethatallcomplaintsandreportsoftortureandotherill-treatmentanddeathsin custodyarepromptly,impartiallyandeffectivelyinvestigatedbyanindependentbody andthatthemethodsandfindingsofsuchinvestigationsaremadepublic.Thisshould includecasescitedinthisreport,suchasthoseofthedetaineesdiscoveredbeingheld atvariousIraqiInteriorMinistrybuildingsinNovemberandDecember2005and thoseofthefourPalestiniansdetainedandtorturedbytheWolfBrigadeinMay2005.

*Suspendofficialssuspectedofcommittingtortureandotherill-treatmentfrom activedutyduringtheinvestigation.

*Ensurethatcomplainants,witnessesandothersatriskareprotectedfrom intimidationandreprisals.

*Bringtojusticethoseresponsiblefortortureandotherserioushumanrights violationsandtrythemaccordingtointernationalstandardsforfairtrialandwithno possibilityofthedeathpenalty.

*Ensurethatstatementsandotherevidenceobtainedthroughtortureandotherill- treatmentmaynotbeinvokedinanyproceedings,exceptagainstapersonaccusedof torture.

*Ensurethatvictimsoftortureandotherill-treatmentandtheirdependantsshouldbe entitledtoobtainpromptreparationfromthestateincludingrestitution,fairand adequatefinancialcompensationandappropriatemedicalcareandrehabilitation,and establishappropriatemechanismsandprocedurestofacilitatethis.

*Ratify,asamatterofurgency,theConventionagainstTortureandOtherCruel, InhumanorDegradingTreatmentorPunishment(ConventionagainstTorture)and itsOptionalProtocol,whichallowsindependentinternationalandnationalexpertsto conductregularvisitstoplacesofdetentionwithintheterritoryofstatesparties,to assesstheconditionsofdetentionandtomakerecommendationsforimprovements.

Concerningprotectionofdetaineesandprisoners

*Releaseorchargewithrecognizablecriminaloffencesallthosecurrentlyheld withoutcharge.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 46 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq

*Ensurethatpersonstakenintocustodyarebroughtbeforeaninvestigativejudge withintwenty-fourhoursofarrest,inconformitywithIraqilaw.

*Ensurethatdetaineeshaveaccesstolegalcounselwithin24hoursandaregiven promptaccesstotheirfamilies.

*Ensurethatallprisonersanddetaineesareinformedpromptlyofthereasonsoftheir detention.

*Ensurethatalldetaineesareheldonlyinofficiallyrecognizedplacesofdetention andthataccurateinformationabouttheirarrestandwhereaboutsismadeimmediately availabletorelatives,lawyersandthecourts.

*Ensurethatalldetaineesareimmediatelyinformedoftheirrights.Theseincludethe righttolodgecomplaintsabouttheirtreatment,tohaveajudgerulewithoutdelayon thelawfulnessoftheirdetentionandtohavealawyerpresentduringinterrogations.

*Ensurethatconditionsofdetentionconformtointernationalstandardsforthe treatmentofprisoners.Theauthoritiesresponsiblefordetentionshouldbeseparate fromthoseinchargeofinterrogation.Thereshouldberegular,independent, unannouncedandunrestrictedvisitsofinspectiontoallplacesofdetention.

*Provideunhinderedaccesstoallplacesofdetention,theirinstallationsandfacilities, anddetaineesbyrelevantinternationalorganizationsandbodies,includingtheUN SpecialRapporteurontorture,andbyIraqihumanrightsorganizations.

TogovernmentsofcountriescontributingtotheMNF–in particulartheUSandtheUK Concerningtortureandill-treatment

*DeclarepubliclyinrelationtotheactivitiesoftheMNFinIraqthegovernment’s totaloppositiontotortureandothercruel,inhumanordegradingtreatmentor punishmentandmakecleartoallmembersofthemilitaryandallothergovernment agencies,aswellasMNFallies,thattortureorotherill-treatmentwillnotbetolerated underanycircumstances.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq 47

*Ensurethatallcomplaintsoftortureandotherill-treatment-whetherinvolving membersoftheMNF,othergovernmentagencies,medicalpersonnel,private contractorsandinterpreters-aresubjecttoprompt,thorough,independentand impartialcivilianinvestigationsinstrictconformitywithinternationallawand standardsconcerninginvestigationsofhumanrightsviolations.Ensurethatthe methodsandfindingsofsuchinvestigationsaremadepublic.

*Suspendofficialssuspectedofcommittingtortureandotherill-treatmentfrom activedutyduringtheinvestigation.

*Bringtotrialallindividuals–regardlessofpositionorrank-againstwhomthereis evidenceofhavingauthorized,condonedorcommittedtortureorotherill-treatment orotherserioushumanrightsviolations.Ensurethatalltrialsforallegedperpetrators complywithinternationalfairtrialstandards.

*Ensurethatvictimsoftortureandotherill-treatmentandtheirdependantsshouldbe entitledtoobtainpromptreparationfromthestateincludingrestitution,fairand adequatefinancialcompensationandappropriatemedicalcareandrehabilitation.

*Prohibittheuseofelectro-shockgunsagainstanindividualwhoisalreadyinthe custodyorcontrolofsecurityorlawenforcementofficials,andtakemeasuresto ensurethattheyarenevermadeavailableorusedduringinterrogationsorasameans todisciplineadetainee.

Concerningprotectionofdetaineesandprisoners

*EndindefiniteinternmentofpersonsinIraq.

*Ensurethatalldetaineesareinformedpromptlyofthereasonsfortheirdetention.

*Ensurethatalldetaineesarebroughtpromptlybeforeacourtinorderthatthecourt canassessthelawfulnessoftheirdetentionandorderthereleaseofindividualswhose detentionisfoundtobeunlawful,inaccordancewithrightssetoutinArticle9ofthe ICCPR.

*Ensurethatalldetaineesarereleasedorchargedwitharecognizablecriminal offencepromptlyandprovidedafairtrialinaccordancewithinternationallawand whichexcludesthedeathpenalty.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006 48 BeyondAbuGhraib:detentionandtortureinIraq

*EnsurethatalldetaineeshandedovertotheIraqiauthoritiesarenotatriskofbeing subjectedtotortureandill-treatmentandwherethereissucharisktoholdthe detaineesonbehalfoftheIraqiauthorities,whilecriminalproceedingsareongoing anduntilsuchtimeassufficientsafeguardsareputinplacetopreventtortureandill- treatment.

*Ensurethatrelativesandlegalcounselhavepromptaccesstodetainees.

*Ensurethataccurateinformationabouttheirarrestandwhereaboutsismade immediatelyavailabletodetainees’relativesandlawyers.

*Ensurethatalldetaineesareheldonlyinofficiallyrecognizedplacesofdetention andprohibittheholdingofpersonswithoutrecordas“ghostdetainees”andany transferofdetaineesoutsideIraqiterritory.

*Ensurethatconditionsofdetentionconformtointernationalstandardsforthe treatmentofprisoners.Makeprovisionfortheretoberegular,independent, unannouncedandunrestrictedvisitsofinspectiontoallplacesofdetentionbyan independentbodywithappropriateexpertiseinassessingdetentionconditionsandthe treatmentofprisoners.

*Provideunhinderedaccesstoallplacesofdetention,theirinstallationsandfacilities, anddetaineesbyrelevantinternationalorganizationsandbodies,includingtheUN SpecialRapporteuronTorture,andbyIraqihumanrightsorganizations.

AmnestyInternationalMarch2006 AIIndex:MDE14/001/2006