Hydrologic Condition

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hydrologic Condition it V11 V - a A 4A d66 d A 4 dd4 A CI Ad ii1 A 0 V4A 41 1, tSad * 1994 Extended Wet Sea Hydrologic Condition: A 4t d a ORE 324 SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Department of Water Resources Evaluation U Ecosystems Research and Implementation Department U Operations and Maintenance Department U Planning Department U Regulation Department U Office of Government and Public Affairs Technical Memorandum 1994 EXTENDED WET SEASON HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS DRE 324 South Florida Water Management District May 1995 1994 Extended Wet Season Hydrologic Conditions Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................ 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................. 2. METEOROLOGICAL DESCRIPTION OF 1994 ..................... .. 3 3. RAINFALL ANALYSIS .................................. SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION AND FREQUENCY ANALYSIS .............. RAINFALL MEASURING STATIONS WITHIN SUBBASINS OF THE DISTRICT ................................. ..... RAINFALL DATA ANALYSIS ...................... .......... ISOHYTAL MAPS............................................. 4. SYSTEM OPERATION (WATER LEVELS AND DISCHARGES) ...... .... 51 DISTRICT-WIDE WATER LEVELS.......... UPPER KISSIMMEE RIVER BASIN Water Levels Discharges ...................... Flooding Complaints ............ ... .. UPPER EAST COAST W ater Levels ...................... Flooding Complaints ................ LAKE OKEECHOBEE Water Levels Pulse Releases and Regulatory Discharges . Flooding Complaints ................... EVERGLADES AGRICULTURE AREA (EAA) .. Inflows to Lake Okeechobee from EAA .. Flooding Complaints ................ .. WATER CONSERVATION AREAS........... LOWER EAST COAST ...... ............. Water Levels ...................... i Flooding Complaints ................. ~I 5. IMPACTS TO ESTUARIES AND BAYS .................. 105 IMPACTS TO THE CALOOSAHATCHEE ESTUARY DURING THE 1994 WET SEASON...................... 107 Caloosahatchee River System ..................... 107 Salinity Envelope for the Caloosahatchee Estuary ...... 108 Freshwater Input May-December 1994 .............. 108 Salinity Distribution within the Estuary ............. 112 1994 Extended Wet Season Hydrologic Conditions Table of Contents Seagrasses ......... ............................. ...... 116 Conclusions ..................................... 116 IMPACTS TO THE ST. LUCIE ESTUARY DURING THE 1994 WET SEASON 119 St. Lucie Estuary Watershed .................... ............ 119 Environmental Issues: St. Lucie Estuary and Indian River Lagoon ..... .121 Salinity Envelope for the St. Lucie Estuary ......... ..... 121 Freshwater Input .............. ................... .. 122 Salinity Distribution within the Estuary . ........ 112 Conclusions Conclusions................................... 136 Short-Term Management Suggestion .............. ......... 136 CONDITIONS IN FLORIDA BAY DURING THE 1994 WET SEASON 137 Summary .... 137 Rainfall R.............................................. 137 Freshwater Discharge ....... .............................. 138 S .t . 138 Salinity ............. ............................ 140 W ater Quality ....................... -........... ....... 153 Biological Effects Biological.................. Effects .......... .... ...... 154 6. WATER QUALITY CONDITIONS ............................... 155 KISSIMMEE RIVER WATER QUALITY STATUS ..................... 155 S65 .. 65C -............................................... .... 155 LAK. ............. ...................................... 155 LAKE OKEEHOBEE WATER QUALTY STATUS................... 160 LoadingLoading Trends .............. ................. ........... 160 Performance Standards and Trends ............................ 160 Tributary Inflows and Outflows ............... .. ...... 161 Water Quality in Lake Okeechobee . .. - . ...... 161 EVERGLADES WATER QUALITY STATUS .......................... 161 EAA Basin E...............................................178 . ........... 178 Inflow to the Everglades National Park ......................... 178 APPENDICES....... - ........ ......... ..... ................ - ..... ...187 1994 Extended Wet Season Hydrologic Conditions Table of Contents 1994 Extended Wet Season Hydro1o~ic Conditions Table of Contents List of Figures Figure 1., Monthly Rainfall for 1994 ............................................ 4 Figure 2. Basin Rainfall for 1994 ................................................ 4 Figure 3. District-wide Rainfall Anomaly from June 1-December 31, 1994. ......... 6 Figure 4. Rainfall Measuring Stations within Subbasins of the District. .......... 11 Figure 5. Daily and Monthly Rainfall Reporting Areas ..................... 12 Figure 6A. Average Wet Season Rainfall (May-October 31). ................... 41 Figure 6B. Wet Season Rainfall (May 1-October 31, 1994) ..................... 42 Figure 6C. Rainfall Total for May through December 1994 ................... 43 Figure 7A. Monthly Average Rainfall for November ........................ 44 Figure 7B. Monthly Rainfall for November 1994 ........................... 44 Figure 7C. Tropical Storm Gordon (November 15-17, 1994) Rainfall Totals. ....... 45 Figure 7D. Tropical Storm Gordon (November 15-17, 1994) Rainfall 1-Day Maximum. ....... .......... .............................. .. ..... 45 Figure 7E. Tropical Storm Gordon (November 15-17, 1994) Rainfall 2-Day Maximum. ............................................. 46 Figure 8A. Monthly Average Rainfall for December .......................... 47 Figure 8B. Monthly Rainfall for December 1994. ......................... 48 Figure 8C. Rainfall Total for December 5, 1994 ............................. 49 Figure 8D. Rainfall Total for December 21-22, 1994. ......................... 50 Figure 8E. December 21-22, 1994 Rainfall 1-Day Maximum. .................. 50 Figure 9A. Water Levels and Regulations Schedules for Major Lakes in the Upper Kissimmee River Basin. .................................. 52 Figure 9B. Water Levels and Regulation Schedules for Major Lakes in the Upper Kissimmee River Basin .................................. 53 Figure Water Levels and Regulation Schedule for Lake Kissimmee ........... 54 Figure Orange County Flooded Areas ............ ................... 59 Figure Osceola County Flooded Areas . ....................... ........ 60 Figure Martin County Flooded Areas. ................................. 64 Figure St. Lucie County Flooded Areas ................ ............... 65 Figure Lake Okeechobee Water Levels and Regulation Schedules (May-Dec.). ... 67 Figure Okeechobee County Flooded Areas. ........... ................... 72 Figure Highlands County Flooded Areas ................ ...... ......... 73 Figure Lee and Charlotte Counties' Flooded Areas ........................ 74 Figure Collier County Flooded Areas. ........................ .......... 75 Figure Henry County Flooded Areas. ................................. 76 Figure Water Levels and Regulation Schedules for WCA 1 (May-Dec. 1994) . 81 Figure Water Levels and Regulation Schedules for WCA 2A (May-Dec. 1994). .. 82 Figure Water Levels and Regulation Schedules for WCA 3A (May-Dec. 1994). .. 83 Figure Proposed Temporary Deviation to Regulation Schedule for 1994 ....... 84 Figure Broward County Flooded Areas ............................... 101 Figure Dade County Flooded Areas. ................................ 102 Figure Palm Beach County Flooded Areas ................................ 103 Figure Lake Okeechobee Regulation Schedule Run 25 with 3 Pulse Releases . 106 Figure Caloosahatchee River System .................. .............. 109 1994 Extended Wet Season Hydrologic Conditions Table of Contents Figure 30. Salinity sensors and seagrass sampling stations in the Caloosahatchee Estuary ......................................... 110 Figure 31. Salinity in the Caloosahatchee Estuary at various freshwater inflows ..... 111 Figure 32. Frequency distributions of mean monthly discharges at S-79 (May-Dec. 1994) .............................................. 113 Figure Distribution of salinity in the Caloosahatchee Estuary ................ 114 Figure Distribution of salinity in the Caloosahatchee Estuary (May-Dec. 1994) ... 115 Figure Mean blade density and blade lengths of seagrasses in San Carlos Bay ... 117 Figure St. Lucie Estuary Watershed ................................. 120 Figure Salinity gradients and preferred salinity envelope for the St. Lucie Estuary ...................................... 123 Figure 38. Historical and 1994 wet season flows to the St. Lucie Estuary ......... 124 Figure 39. Historical and 1994 wet season salinity gradients for the St. Lucie Estuary ...................................... 125 Figure 40. Salinity envelope for the St. Lucie Estuary (May-Dec. 1994) .......... 126 Figure 41. Salinity gradients for the St. Lucie Estuary (Oct.-Dec. 1994) .......... 129 Figure 42. Salinity distribution in the Indian River Lagoon (July 12, 1994) ........ 130 Figure 43. Salinity distribution in the Indian River Lagoon (Oct. 10, 1994) ........ 131 Figure 44. Salinity distribution in the Indian River Lagoon (Jan. 9, 1994) .......... 132 Figure 45. Water color in the Indian River Lagoon (July 12, 1994) ............. 133 Figure 46. Water color in the Indian River Lagoon (Oct. 10, 1994) ............. 134 Figure 47. Water color in the Indian River Lagoon (Jan. 9, 1994) .............. 135 Figure 48. Rainfall at S18c (1987-1994) ................................ 138 Figure 49. Freshwater flow to the southern Everglades ...................... 139 Figure 50. Storm event
Recommended publications
  • Indian River Lagoon: Lake Kissimmee Lessons, Challenges and Indian River Lagoon
    Upper Chain of Lakes Indian River Lagoon: Lake Kissimmee Lessons, Challenges and Indian River Lagoon Opportunities Kissimmee River St. Lucie Estuary Lake Okeechobee Caloosahatchee Estuary Mark Perry, Executive Director Everglades Florida Oceanographic Society February 5, 2015 Biscayne Bay Florida Bay Coral Reefs Cool water Warm water Indian River Lagoon •2100 plant species •2200 animal species (700 fish, 310 birds) Most Biodiverse Estuary in North America Six Lagoon Segments – Six Inlets – Seagrass, major habitat Historic Watershed-572,800 acres Current Watershed- 1,216,640 acres 24 Major Drainage Canals – C-44 (St. Lucie Canal) the largest in the watershed Major Population Increase 1960 to Present Major Problems in the Indian River Lagoon Loss of Seagrass Beds Loss of Mangrove Wetlands & Shorelines Mosquito Impoundments – Disconnected Habitat Major Alteration and Expansion Drainage System in Watershed Changes in Circulation and Tidal Influences Major Increase in Nutrient Levels and Sediment Loads Major Increase in Boating, Fishing, Marina & Waterfront activity Increase in Invasive & Exotic Plants and Animals The ‘perfect storm’ , 2011 superbloom, 2012 brown tide bloom ??? 170,000 acres of Lagoon bottom appropriate for seagrass habitat. Less than 84,000 acres support seagrass. More than 50% of the seagrass beds have been lost from the Lagoon. Direct Effects on Fisheries Economically important Spotted Seatrout fishery decline from overfishing and inhibited reproduction by low salinity levels in the estuary. Bottlenose Dolphins in Indian River Lagoon have Skin Disorders such as Dolphin Pox and Lobomycosis- (FAU HBOI) Sea Turtles in the Indian River Lagoon have Skin Disorders such as Fibropapilloma Upper Chain of Lakes flow south into Lake Kissimmee Lake Kissimmee flows south into the Kissimmee River – 105-mile Oxbow River with 2-mile-wide floodplain Water takes 6-8 Months to reach Lake Okeechobee Lake Okeechobee flows south through “River “River of Grass”, Everglades - 60-mile of wide shallow (1-foot deep) river flowing Grass” at 1 mile in 4 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian River Lagoon Council Board of Directors Meeting
    Indian River Lagoon Council Board of Directors Meeting Water Conditions Update Deborah Drum, Manager Ecosystem Restoration & Management Division Engineering Department Friday, October 13, 2017 Water Management District-Wide Rainfall September 2017 • September rainfall surpassed September average by 6.30” • District-wide, September rainfall was 13.27” (190% of average rainfall) • More than 8” attributed to Hurricane Irma Water Management District-Wide Rainfall October 2017 • October rainfall is 2.84” • 220% of average rainfall • 1 month precipitation outlook predicted as “above average” Rainfall Resulted in Serious Flooding State-wide Flooded Community along Shingle Creek west of Lake Toho (Kissimmee Area) Upper East Coast Operations • SFWMD releasing as much as possible through S-49 (C-24), S-97 (C-23) and S-99 (C-25) • Gordy Road structured overtopped during Irma • SFWMD utilized Ten Mile Creek Reservoir following the event Current Conditions (as of 0000 hours on October 11, 2017) • Lake Okeechobee at 17.20 feet. • Last time Lake O stage was this high was Oct. 2004 • Lake level increased ~3.5 feet from Irma rainfall, runoff and associated inflows, and October rainfall • Army Corps of Engineers commenced maximum practicable releases to St. Lucie Estuary on September 15th and to Caloosahatchee Estuary on September 19th. • S-80 was releasing ~4600 cfs yesterday; varies with tides. • S-80 flows ranging from 1190-4850 cfs • 770 million – 3.1 billion gallons / day • About 10% of flows from Lake Okeechobee Current Conditions (continued) • Lake inflows peaked ~38,000 cfs and have reduced to ~14,000 cfs coming mostly from Kissimmee • Maximizing flows through East Coast canals.
    [Show full text]
  • Outfall and Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Analysis 2015
    INDIAN RIVER LAGOON OUTFALL AND SEA LEVEL RISE VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS 2015 Outfall and Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Analysis Prepared by: The East Central Florida Regional Planning Council April 2016 1 INDIAN RIVER LAGOON OUTFALL AND SEA LEVEL RISE VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS 2015 Page intentionally left blank 2 INDIAN RIVER LAGOON OUTFALL AND SEA LEVEL RISE VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS 2015 Table of Contents I. Introduction 4 II. Planning Process and Outreach 5 III. GIS Methodology 7 ECFRPC 7 UF GeoPlan 10 IV: County Inundation Analyses 12 Volusia County Vulnerability Analysis 13 Brevard County Vulnerability Analysis 15 Indian River Vulnerability Analysis 17 St. Lucie County Vulnerability Analysis 19 Martin County Vulnerability Analysis 21 Canal System Vulnerability Analysis 23 V: Study Area Inundation Maps 24 High Projection Rate Curve Maps 25 Intermediate Projection Rate Curve Maps 37 Low Projection Rate Curve Maps 49 VI: Maintenance Information 62 VII: Planning Team Contacts 66 VIII: Source Documentation 67 3 INDIAN RIVER LAGOON OUTFALL AND SEA LEVEL RISE VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS 2015 SECTION I: Introduction This vulnerability analysis is part of a grant awarded by the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity to the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council and the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council to continue the work done for an associated grant awarded in 2014. As part of the 2014-15 planning project, the ECFRPC collected data and mapped all outfalls within the Indian River Lagoon, its connected water bodies and primary canals that flow into the lagoon system. As part of the 2014 project, the planning team also collected data for water quality, outfall ownership, and other important information.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 U.S
    U.S. Department of the Interior Prepared in cooperation with the Appendix 1 U.S. Geological Survey Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Office of Agricultural Water Policy Open-File Report 2014−1257 81°45' 81°30' 81°15' 81°00' 80°45' 524 Jim Creek 1 Lake Hart 501 520 LAKE 17 ORANGE 417 Lake Mary Jane Saint Johns River 192 Boggy Creek 535 Shingle Creek 519 429 Lake Preston 95 17 East Lake Tohopekaliga Saint Johns River 17 Reedy Creek 28°15' Lake Lizzie Lake Winder Saint Cloud Canal ! Lake Tohopekaliga Alligator Lake 4 Saint Johns River EXPLANATION Big Bend Swamp Brick Lake Generalized land use classifications 17 for study purposes: Crabgrass Creek Land irrigated Lake Russell Lake Mattie Lake Gentry Row crops Lake Washington Peppers−184 acresLake Lowery Lake Marion Creek 192 Potatoes−3,322 acres 27 Lake Van Cantaloupes−633 acres BREVARD Lake Alfred Eggplant−151 acres All others−57 acres Lake Henry ! UnverifiedLake Haines crops−33 acres Lake Marion Saint Johns River Jane Green Creek LakeFruit Rochelle crops Cypress Lake Blueberries−41 acres Citrus groves−10,861 acres OSCEOLA Peaches−67 acresLake Fannie Lake Hamilton Field Crops Saint Johns River Field corn−292 acres Hay−234 acres Lake Hatchineha Rye grass−477 acres Lake Howard Lake 17 Seeds−619 acres 28°00' Ornamentals and grasses Ornamentals−240 acres Tree nurseries−27 acres Lake Annie Sod farms−5,643Lake Eloise acres 17 Pasture (improved)−4,575 acres Catfish Creek Land not irrigated Abandoned groves−4,916 acres Pasture−259,823 acres Lake Rosalie Water source Groundwater−18,351 acres POLK Surface water−9,106 acres Lake Kissimmee Lake Jackson Water Management Districts irrigated land totals Weohyakapka Creek Tiger Lake South Florida Groundwater−18,351 acres 441 Surface water−7,596 acres Lake Marian St.
    [Show full text]
  • Kissimmee Basin Water Supply Plan (2000 KB Plan), the Planning Process Analyses Identified Key Regional Issues
    TTaabbllee ooff CCoonntteennttss Appendix A: Water Supply Development Projects Water Supply Development Projects .........................................................2 Appendix B: Information for Local Government Comprehensive Plans 1. Checklist of Needed Comprehensive Plan Data........................................1 1a. Cited Statutory Provisions (relevant portions) .........................................5 2. Tables Showing which Utilities Serve which Jurisdictions ...........................8 3. Maps of Utility Areas Currently Served (2005) and to-be-Served (2025)......... 10 Appendix C: Accomplishments Overview..........................................................................................1 Appendix D: Urban and Agricultural Demand Projections Demand Assessments and Projections........................................................1 Categories of Use................................................................................2 Public Water Supply and Domestic Self-Supply Demands .................................2 Agricultural Self-Supply ...................................................................... 10 Commercial/Industrial Self-Supply ......................................................... 26 Thermoelectric Power Generation Self-Supply ........................................... 27 Recreational Self-Supply ..................................................................... 27 Total Annual Water Demand................................................................. 35 Summary of 1-in-10 Year Water
    [Show full text]
  • St. Lucie River Is 35 Miles Long and Has Two Major Forks, the North Fork and the South Fork
    The St. Lucie River is 35 miles long and has two major forks, the North Fork and the South Fork. In the 1880s, the system was basically a freshwater stream flowing into the Indian River Lagoon. An inlet was dug in 1892 by local residents to provide direct access to the Atlantic Ocean, thus changing the St. Lucie from a river to an estuary. An estuary is found where a fresh water body (a river) meets a salt water body (the ocean) and forms brackish water. Estuaries have a high diver- sity of both plants and animals. Seagrasses, oysters, marine fish and invertebrates are all found in estuaries. FORT PIERCE C-25 U.S. 1 A1A Indian River Dr. C-24 PORT INDIAN RIVER LAGOON ST. LUCIE A1A HUTCHINSON C-24 d. ISLAND Blv ie uc t. L t S or P d Blv ach Be n se n Je C-23 JENSEN BEACH No rth Fo ST. LUCIE COUNTY rk ST. LUCIE C-23 RIVER MARTIN COUNTY Bessey S FLORIDA TURNPIKE Creek o A1A u STUART t h F o r PALM k CITY U.S. 1 ST. LUCIE INLET I-95 PORT SALERNO A1A S.R. 76 C-44 I-95 HOBE SOUND S.R. 710 HISTORY OF THE Creek in Palm City. The C-44 from Lake Okeechobee carries water east into the ST. LUCIE RIVER South Fork. When Lake Okeechobee The Ais Indians were first documented water levels get too high, water is in 1568 as occupying areas close to the released into the canal/river system.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Reasonable Assurance Plans As Alternatives to Tmdls
    Use of Reasonable Assurance Plans as Alternatives to TMDLs Florida Stormwater Association Winter 2017 Meeting 6 December 2017 Presentations by: • Tony Janicki • Julie Espy • Tiffany Busby • Judy Grim • Brett Cunningham Florida Reasonable Assurance Plans Julie Espy Florida Department of Environmental Protection Florida Stormwater Association Winter 2017 Meeting 6 December 2017 Florida’s Requirements • Section 303(d) of the Federal CWA • Florida statute 403.067 established the Florida Watershed Restoration Act in 1999 • Surface Water Quality Standards Rule 62- 302, F A.C. • Impaired Waters Rule (IWR) 62-303, F.A.C. Watershed Management Approach Waterbody Identification Number - WBID Assessment Unit (waterbody) Blue Lake WBID Boundary Line for the stream WBID Assessment Unit (waterbody) and WBID line for lake WBID Assessment Category Descriptions Category 1 - Attaining all designated uses Category 2 - Not impaired and no TMDL is needed Category 3 - Insufficient data to verify impairment (3a, 3b, 3c) Category 4 - Sufficient data to verify impairment, no TMDL is needed because: 4a – A TMDL has already been done 4b – Existing or proposed measures will attain water quality standards; Reasonable Assurance 4c – Impairment is not caused by a pollutant, natural conditions 4d – No causative pollutant has been identified for DO or Biology 4e – On-going restoration activities are underway to improve/restore the waterbody Category 5 - Verified impaired and a TMDL is required Descriptions of the Lists • Planning list – used to plan for monitoring • Study
    [Show full text]
  • Your Guide to Eating Fish Caught in Florida
    Fish Consumption Advisories are published periodically by the Your Guide State of Florida to alert consumers about the possibility of chemically contaminated fish in Florida waters. To Eating The advisories are meant to inform the public of potential health risks of specific fish species from specific Fish Caught water bodies. In Florida February 2019 Florida Department of Health Prepared in cooperation with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and Agriculture and Consumer Services, and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission 2019 Florida Fish Advisories • Table 1: Eating Guidelines for Fresh Water Fish from Florida Waters (based on mercury levels) page 1-50 • Table 2: Eating Guidelines for Marine and Estuarine Fish from Florida Waters (based on mercury levels) page 51-52 • Table 3: Eating Guidelines for species from Florida Waters with Heavy Metals (other than mercury), Dioxin, Pesticides, Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), or Saxitoxin Contamination page 53-54 Eating Fish is an important part of a healthy diet. Rich in vitamins and low in fat, fish contains protein we need for strong bodies. It is also an excellent source of nutrition for proper growth and development. In fact, the American Heart Association recommends that you eat two meals of fish or seafood every week. At the same time, most Florida seafood has low to medium levels of mercury. Depending on the age of the fish, the type of fish, and the condition of the water the fish lives in, the levels of mercury found in fish are different. While mercury in rivers, creeks, ponds, and lakes can build up in some fish to levels that can be harmful, most fish caught in Florida can be eaten without harm.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of Activities Conducted Under the Cooperative Aquatic Plant Control Program in Florida Public Waters for Fiscal Year 2012-2013
    Annual Report of Activities Conducted under the Cooperative Aquatic Plant Control Program in Florida Public Waters for Fiscal Year 2012-2013 Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Invasive Plant Management Section Submitted by: FL Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Invasive Plant Management Section 3900 Commonwealth Blvd. MS705 Tallahassee, FL 32399 Phone: 850-617-9420 Fax: 850-922-1249 Annual Report of Activities Conducted under the Cooperative Aquatic Plant Control Program in Florida Public Waters for Fiscal Year 2012-2013 This report was prepared in accordance with §369.22 (7), Florida Statutes, to provide an annual summary of plants treated and funding necessary to manage aquatic plants in public waters. The Cooperative Aquatic Plant Control Program administered by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) in Florida’s public waters involves complex operational and financial interactions between state, federal and local governments as well as private sector companies. FWC’s aquatic plant management program mission is to reduce negative impacts from invasive nonindigenous plants like water hyacinth, water lettuce and hydrilla to conserve the multiple uses and functions of public lakes and rivers. Invasive plants infest 96% of Florida’s 451 public waters inventoried in 2013 that comprise 1.26 million acres of fresh water. Once established, eradicating invasive plants is difficult or impossible and very expensive; therefore, continuous maintenance is critical to keep invasive plants at low levels to
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of the Indian River Lagoon and Adjacent Waters, Florida
    FISHES OF THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON AND ADJACENT WATERS, FLORIDA by R. Grant Gilmore, Jr. Christopher J. Donohoe Douglas W. Cooke Harbor Branch Foundation, Inc. RR 1, Box 196 Fort Pierce, Florida 33450 and David J. Herrema Applied Biology, Inc. 641 DeKalb Industrial Way Decatur, Georgia 30033 Harbor Branch Foundation, Inc. Technical Report No. 41 September 1981 Funding was provided by the Harbor Branch Foundation, Inc. and Florida Power & Light Company, Miami, Florida FISHES OF THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON AND ADJACENT WATERS, FLORIDA R. Grant Gilmore, Jr. Christopher Donohoe Dougl as Cooke Davi d Herrema INTRODUCTION It is the intent of this presentation to briefly describe regional fish habitats and to list the fishes associated with these habitats in the Indian River lagoon, its freshwater tributaries and the adjacent continental shelf to a depth of 200 m. A brief historical review of other regional ichthyological studies is also given. Data presented here revises the first regional description and checklist of fishes in east central Florida (Gilmore, 1977). The Indian River is a narrow estuarine lagoon system extending from Ponce de Leon Inlet in Vol usia County south to Jupiter Inlet in Palm Beach County (Fig. 1). It lies within the zone of overlap between two well known faunal regimes (i.e. the warm temperate Carolinian and the tropical Caribbean). To the north of the region, Hildebrand and Schroeder (1928), Fowler (1945), Struhsaker (1969), Dahlberg (1971), and others have made major icthyofaunal reviews of the coastal waters of the southeastern United States. McLane (1955) and Tagatz (1967) have made extensive surveys of the fishes of the St.
    [Show full text]
  • Osceola County Lakes Management Plan
    2015 Osceola County Lakes Management Plan ADOPTED Osceola County BoCC September 14, 2015 Osceola County Lakes Management Plan Prepared by: Community Development Department Community Resources Office September 2015 The Mission of Osceola County’s Lakes Management Program is to protect, enhance, conserve, restore, and manage the County’s aquatic resources. We accomplish this through education, coordination with other agencies, and maintenance and management of lake systems. Activities include hydrologic management, habitat preservation and enhancement, aquatic plant management, water quality improvement, and provision of recreational opportunities. Our goal is to improve, enhance and sustain lake ecosystem health, while avoiding impacts to downstream systems, for the benefit of the fish and wildlife resources and the residents of, and visitors to, Osceola County. Cover photo: Lake Gentry CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................................... 1 Section 1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 7 Section 2 Lake Management Activities .................................................................... 11 Section 3 Water Quality .......................................................................................... 20 Section 4 Lake Management Plans .......................................................................... 30 Lake Tohopekaliga ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Indian River Lagoon Keri A. Smith The
    An Overview of the Indian River Lagoon Keri A. Smith The University of Florida Soil and Water Science Department Introduction: The Indian River Lagoon (IRL) ecosystem is one of the most diverse estuarine systems in North America, stretching 156 miles along Florida’s east coast (De Freese, 2005). The feature that most distinguishes this lagoon from other estuarine systems is its geographical location straddling the biogeographic temperate Carolinean Province and the subtropical Floridian/Caribbean Province (BioScience, 2002). The lagoon is comprised of numerous tributaries found along its length, and is also affected by man- made drainage canals. The value of the IRL can be best defined by its high diversity of flora and fauna, extensive wetland systems utilized for water purification, and economic benefits from the fishing industry, ports, and recreational activities. However, in recent years, the value of the IRL has been negatively impacted by agricultural use, urban development, in addition to natural causes. Primarily because of anthropogenic activities, algal superblooms have become common in the IRL. Poor water quality has led to deleterious health effects in humans and the widespread loss of many protected species, including manatees, mangroves, and seagrass. Numerous plans and acts have been put in place to offset further damage to the IRL, such as the National Estuary Program (NEP) and the Surface Water Management Plan (SWIM). The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) has established Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL’s) to improve water quality within the lagoon. In addition, the acquisition of land has been a priority to improve the re-connection of natural drainage systems, to restore of historical flows, and to increase the wetland mass within the IRL.
    [Show full text]