Quick viewing(Text Mode)

ZOOTAXA 120: 1-12 (2002) ISSN 1175-5326 (Print Edition) ZOOTAXA 120 Copyright © 2002 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (Online Edition)

ZOOTAXA 120: 1-12 (2002) ISSN 1175-5326 (Print Edition) ZOOTAXA 120 Copyright © 2002 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (Online Edition)

ZOOTAXA 120: 1-12 (2002) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA 120 Copyright © 2002 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition)

Nomenclatural and taxonomic notes on ater (Linné), A. biguttatus (Fabricius) and A. subauratus Gebler (Coleoptera: : Agrilinae)

EDUARD JENDEK Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, SK-842 06 Bratislava, Slovakia E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

A nomenclatural analysis of names cited in synonymy of Agrilus ater (Linné, 1767), A. biguttatus (Fabricius, 1777) and A. subauratus Gebler, 1833 is presented. The availability and status of each name is examined, discussed and an updated list of subspecies and synonyms, both available and unavailable, is given. Agrilus ater jureceki Obenberger, 1924 is considered a junior subjective synonym of A. ater.

Key words: , nomenclature, synonymy, Coleoptera, Buprestidae, Agrilinae, Agrilus, Pa- laearctic Region

Introduction

This contribution represents further contributions to the nomenclatural – taxonomic series of papers (Jendek 2002a, 2002b, 2002c, 2000d) on Palaearctic species of the genus Agrilus Curtis, 1825 undertaken with the aim to clean up the synonymy from unavailable names. All names, whether available or unavailable, which have been discovered in the literature are examined herein.

Material and methods

Abbreviations used: square brackets “[ ]” are used for my remarks and addenda; the back- slash “\” is used to separate data from different labels; [p], preceding data printed; [h], pre- ceding data hand-written. Abbreviations for museums are: HMUG = Hunterian Museum, Glasgow University, Scotland; NMPC = Národní muzeum v Praze, Prague, Czech Repub-

Accepted: 2 December 2002; published: 16 December 2002 1 ZOOTAXA lic; and ZMUK = Zoologisches Museum und Museum für Völkerkunde, Christian-Albre- 120 chts-Universität zu Kiel, Germany. Issues of nomenclature were resolved by consulting the Fourth Edition of the Interna- tional Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN, 1999). Articles of the Code discussed herein are simply cited as, for example, “Article 74.5”. The names in each group are listed chronologically, then alphabetically, with the analyzed names divided into three groups: The names originally proposed for a species and subspecies or replacement names include the name, the author, date, and page number for the original description, followed by (in parentheses) the verbatim transcription from the original publication, when needed with my supplemental comments in “[ ]”. The names originally proposed for an infrasubspecific entity are cited with the same attributes as the foregoing category. The availability of each name is treated and the corresponding Article of the Code is cited. The unavailable names originally proposed for infrasubspecific entities are included in synonymy only in order to eliminate confusion or questions about their status. Nonetheless, they have no nomenclatural status. The names that were never proposed as new (unpublished names, misidentification, incorrect subsequent spelling, etc.) are, nevertheless, considered names, although they were never proposed as a new name of a taxon or a new replacement name proposed to replace a junior homonym. Nevertheless, they have been cited in references as though they were synonyms. This practice is misleading and confusing. These names are cited herein only to resolve their status. Each name is listed in the form (name, author) in which it was firstly introduced, followed by (in parentheses) the verbatim transcription from the origi- nal publication. Type localities are cited only for available names and they are quoted in form of the original citation. My supplementary comments and updates are consistently given in “[ ]”. Localities have been updated according to the GEOnet Names Server of the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA).

Agrilus ater (Linné, 1767)

ater Linné, 1767: 663. (B[uprestis]. atra) Type locality: “Habitat in Germania”.

available synonyms - sexguttatus Brahm, 1791 - subeuropeellus Thomson, 1878 - jureceki Obenberger, 1924 syn. nov. - eutenes Obenberger, 1924

2 © 2002 Magnolia Press JENDEK Available names proposed for species and subspecies or replacement names ZOOTAXA 120 sexguttatus Brahm, 1791: LXXII, 141. ([Buprestis] Sex-guttata, Buprestis 6. guttata) A junior primary homonym of Buprestis sexguttata Thunberg, 1789 (now in Agrilus) and a junior subjective synonym of A. ater (according Saunders 1870: 4, 29). Type locality not given, but presumably Germany, because Brahm’s book deals with pests in Germany. subeuropeellus Thomson, 1878: 88. (Agrilus subeuropeellus Thomson) A species described from Brazil. Obenberger (1960: 148) after the type examination synonymized this species as a junior subjective synonym of A. ater with a mistaken type locality “Le type de M. J. Thomson n'est rien d'autre que le bien connu Agrilus ater L. (= A. sexguttatus auct.) de l'Europe centrale et méridionale. Vraisamblablement il s'agit d'un simple changement de l'ettiquette de localité”. Type locality: “Brasilia” [erroneous statement of type locality]. jureceki Obenberger, 1924: 39-40. (Agrilus ater ssp. Juregeki m. n. ssp.) syn. nov. This name was originally proposed as a subspecies. Théry (1942a: 136, 137) consid- ered it mere aberration of A. ater. The single type specimen without genitalia from the col- lection of Obenberger (NMPC) was examined. The lectotype (by present designation) bears following labels: “Simbirsk - Gub. Rossia oc. Dr. Juregek 1917 [p] \ Mus. Nat. Pra- gue [p] 24248 [h] Inv. [p] [orange label] \ Agrilus ater ssp. Juregeki m. Type [h] Det. Dr. Obenberger [p]”. Number of syntypes unknown. The examined specimen is conspecific with A. ater. Type locality: “Simbirsk. [= Ul'yanovskaya Oblast', 54°20'N, 48°24'E] Gub. - Rossia occ.”. Obenberger (1936: 954) cited it erroneously from Eastern Russia. eutenes Obenberger, 1924: 40. (Agrilus ater ssp. eutenes m. n. ssp.) This name was originally proposed as a subspecies. Théry (1942a: 136) considered it mere aberration of A. ater. Curletti (1987: 151) synonymized it as the junior subjective synonym of A. ater. Type locality: “Italia borealis [N Italy]”.

Unpublished names and misidentification biguttatus Rossi (B[uprestis] biguttata [F.]) Rossi (1790: 191) misidentified A. sexguttatus under the name biguttatus according to Schönherr (1817: 243), who attributed biguttatus to Rossi and cited it in the synonymy of A. sexguttatus. Rossi did not describe the species as new; he attributed it to Fabricius. Misidentification.

AGRILUS NOMENCLATURE © 2002 Magnolia Press 3 ZOOTAXA sexguttatus Herbst (Buprestis 6 guttata) 120 Despite the fact that Herbst (1801: 265-266) cited “Buprestis 6 guttata” without explicit attribution of authorship, his remark “Brahm fand it auf der Schwarzpappel” indi- cates that Herbst did not proposed this species as new; he diagnosed sexguttatus of Brahm (see above). The first time it was cited by Schönherr (1817: 243). Unpublished name.

Agrilus biguttatus (Fabricius, 1777)

biguttatus Fabricius, 1777: 237. (Buprestis biguttata)

The redescription of the female “metatype” (lectotype?) from the HMUG was published by Staig (1940: 78-84). Furthermore, there are five type specimens (syntypes?, paralecto- types?) of this taxon preserved in ZMUK (Zimsen 1964: 156). Nomenclatural problems pertaining to priority and validity of this name were treated by Silfverberg (1977: 92). Type locality: “Habitat in Anglia”.

available synonyms - pannonicus Piller & Mitterpacher, 1783 - subfasciatus Ménétriés, 1832 - morosus Gory & Laporte, 1837

unavailable synonyms - aenescens Schilsky, 1888 - coerulescens Schilsky, 1888 - hiemalis Obenberger, 1917 - cepelaki Roubal, 1927 - violascens Théry, 1928 - kabylianus Méquignon, 1928 - bicolor Fleischer, 1930 - eumelas Obenberger, 1934

Available names proposed for species and subspecies or replacement names

pannonicus Piller & Mitterpacher, 1783: 37-38. (Buprestis pannonica. Mordella. Scop.) The first synonymy of this name as the junior subjective synonym of A. biguttatus was by Schönherr (1817: 243). Type locality not given but pressumably “Sclavoniae provinciam [Slavonia?, a historic region in N Croatia] as indicated in the title.

subfasciatus Ménétriés, 1832: 153-154. (Buprestis subfasciata, mihi) This name was originally proposed as a species. Abeille (1897: 9) considered it a vari- ety of A. biguttatus. Bílý (1982: 72) listed it in synonymy of A. biguttatus.

4 © 2002 Magnolia Press JENDEK Type locality: “Lenkoran” [= Lankaran, 38°45'22"N, 48°50'52"E], Azerbaijan]. ZOOTAXA 120 morosus Gory & Laporte, 1837: 35-36. (Agrilus morosus) A species described from Brazil. Obenberger (1960: 152), after examination of the type, synonymized this species as a junior subjective synonym of A. biguttatus with a mis- taken type locality “Il s'agit ici encore une fois, d'une erreur banale de localité. Le type de cette espèce n'est rien d'autre que le très commun Agrilus biguttatus”. Type locality: “Brésil” [erroneous statement of type locality].

Names originally proposed for an infrasubspecific entities aenescens Schilsky, 1888: 187. (Agrilus pannonicus v. aenescens m.) The name aenescens was proposed as a variety of A. pannonicus. The content of the work unambiguously revealed that the name was proposed as an infrasubspecific entity, since the taxon was very briefly diagnosed only by differences in color: “Flgd. metallish grün”. This name was never adopted as a valid name of a species or a subspecies. Follow- ing Article 45.6.4, such a name should be deemed infrasubspecific and unavailable from the original publication. coerulescens Schilsky, 1888: 187. (Agrilus pannonicus v. coerulescens m.) The name coerulescens was proposed for a variety of A. pannonicus. The content of the work unambiguously revealed that the name was proposed as an infrasubspecific entity, since the taxon was very briefly diagnosed only by differences in color: “Flgd. mehr oder weniger blau”. This name was never adopted as a valid name of a species or a subspe- cies. Following Article 45.6.4, such a name should be deemed infrasubspecific and unavailable from the original publication. hiemalis Obenberger, 1917: 213. ([Agrilus biguttatus] ... hiemalis m.) Proposed as a replacement name for the unavailable name coerulescens Schilsky, 1888 (see above) and thus is an unavailable name. cepelaki Roubal, 1927: 56. (Agrilus biguttatus a. fepeláki n.) Proposed as an aberration of A. biguttatus and thus is an unavailable name (Article 45.6.2). violascens Théry, 1928: 422, 429. (Agrilus biguttatus v. violascens nov.) The name violascens was proposed for a variety of A. biguttatus. The content of the work unambiguously revealed that the name was proposed as an infrasubspecific entity, since the taxon was very briefly diagnosed only by differences in color: “D'un violet mag- nifique en dessus, dessous bleu”. This name was never adopted as a valid name of a spe- cies or a subspecies and even Théry (1942a: 137) listed it as a synonym of A. biguttatus a.

AGRILUS NOMENCLATURE © 2002 Magnolia Press 5 ZOOTAXA coeruleoviolaceus Thomson (see below). Following Article 45.6.4, such a name should be 120 deemed infrasubspecific and unavailable from the original publication.

kabylianus Méquignon, 1928: 131. (Agrilus biguttatus var. kabylianus nova) The name kabylianus was proposed as a variety of A. biguttatus. The content of the work unambiguously revealed that name was proposed as an infrasubspecific entity, since the taxon was very briefly diagnosed only by differences in color: “A typo differt colore supra atro-violaceo, subtus atro-caeruleo”. This name was never adopted as a valid name of a species or a subspecies. Following Article 45.6.4, such a name should be deemed infrasubspecific and unavailable from the original publication.

bicolor Fleischer, 1930: 207. ([Agrilus biguttatus] a. bicolor Fleisch.) Proposed as an aberration of A. biguttatus and thus is an unavailable name (Article 45.6.2).

eumelas Obenberger, 1934: 123. (Agrilus biguttatus var. eumelas n.) The name eumelas was proposed as a variety of A. biguttatus. The content of the work unambiguously revealed that name was proposed as an infrasubspecific entity, since the taxon was very briefly diagnosed only by differences in color: “A typo colore totius super- ficies nigerrima differens”. This name was never adopted as a valid name of a species or a subspecies. Following Article 45.6.4, such a name should be deemed infrasubspecific and unavailable from the original publication.

Unpublished names and misidentification

octoguttatus Fourcroy (C[ucujus]. 8-guttatus) In a list of of Paris environs, Fourcroy (1785: 32-34) cited buprestids under the generic name Cucujus without any mention about their authorship. Most of these citations certainly pertain to previously described taxa, e. g. : “chrysostigma” = Chrysobothris chry- sostigma (Linné, 1758); “rusticus” = Buprestis rustica (Linné, 1758); “viridis” = Agrilus viridis (Linné, 1758); “minutus” = Trachys minuta (Linné, 1758); “ater” = Agrilus ater (Linné, 1767). Following this assumption, the name “octoguttatus” is mere citation of Buprestis octoguttata (Linné, 1758) and not proposal of new taxon. The name “octogutta- tus Fourcroy” was introduced to synonymy of A. biguttatus by Obenberger (1936: 966). Misidentification.

coeruleoviolaceus Thomson ([Agrilus biguttatus] Var. Coeruleo-violaceus) Thomson (1864: 39) did not propose new infrasubspecific name, he merely mentioned the color of the chromatic variation. As a name of aberration of A. biguttatus introduced by Obenberger (1936: 967). Unpublished name.

6 © 2002 Magnolia Press JENDEK Agrilus subauratus Gebler, 1833 ZOOTAXA 120 subauratus Gebler, 1833: 277-278. (B[uprestis]. subaurata m. Agrilus)

Although the name subaurata was combined with Buprestis as well as Agrilus by Gebler, this inscription can be considered as originally proposed in the genus Agrilus. The lecto- type designation by Jendek (1998: 330). Type locality: “Prope Loktewsk et Smeïnogorsk [site unlocated]”. available synonyms - coryli Ratzeburg, 1837 - auripennis Gory & Laporte, 1837 unavailable synonyms - zoufali Obenberger, 1914 - gallicus Obenberger, 1917 - theresae Pic, 1918 - saxonicus Obenberger, 1920 - cyanescens Hellén, 1921 - fridolini Barovskij, 1925 - rubripennis Schaefer, 1946 subspecies - ssp. amurensis Obenberger, 1922 available synonyms - demuthi Théry, 1942

unavailable synonyms - linearioides Obenberger, 1922 - euchryseus Obenberger, 1924 - lineimargo Obenberger, 1924 - burjaticus Obenberger, 1924

Available names proposed for species and subspecies or replacement names coryli Ratzeburg, 1837: 53. (B[uprestis]. Coryli) The first synonymy of this name as the junior subjective synonym of A. subauratus was by Kiesenwetter (1857: 131). Type locality: not given, but presumably Germany as indicated from the title: “Wäl- dern Preufsens”. auripennis Gory & Laporte, 1837: 46-47. (Agrilus Auripennis. Solier (Colection)) The first synonymy of this name as the junior subjective synonym of A. subauratus was by Kiesenwetter (1857: 131). The lectotype designation by Jendek (1998: 318).

AGRILUS NOMENCLATURE © 2002 Magnolia Press 7 ZOOTAXA Type locality: “France (Jura) [second-order administrative division, Franche-Comté]”. 120 amurensis Obenberger, 1922: 21-22. (Agrilus amurensis m. n. sp.) The name amurensis was originally proposed for species. Alexeev & Volkovitsh (1989: 318, 347) firstly cited it as a subspecies of A. subauratus. The lectotype designa- tion by Jendek (1995: 146). Type locality: “Siberia orientalis: Amur superior [Amurskaya Oblast’, Russia]”.

demuthi Théry, 1942b: 258-260. (Agrilus Demuthi n. sp.) The first synonymy of this name as the junior subjective synonym of A. subauratus amurensis was by Jendek (1995: 146). Type locality: “Kiachta [= Kyakhta, 50°20'N, 106°30'E, Buryatiya, Russia] Sibérie”.

Names originally proposed for an infrasubspecific entities

zoufali Obenberger, 1914: 28. (Agrilus subauratus var. Zoufali m. n. var.) The name zoufali was proposed as a variety of A. subauratus. The content of the work unambiguously revealed that the name was proposed as an infrasubspecific entity, since the taxon was very briefly diagnosed only by differences in color: “Von der Stammform ... durch die Färbung verschieden: Die ganze Oberseite ist schön smaragdgrün”. This name was never adopted as a valid name of a species or a subspecies. Following Article 45.6.4, such a name should be deemed infrasubspecific and unavailable from the original publica- tion.

gallicus Obenberger, 1917: 213. (Agrilus subauratus ab. gallicus m. n. ab.) Proposed as an aberration of A. subauratus and thus is an unavailable name (Article 45.6.2).

theresae Pic, 1918: 3. (Agrilus subauratus v. nov. Theresae) The name theresae was proposed as a variety of A. subauratus. The content of the work unambiguously revealed that the name was proposed as an infrasubspecific entity, since the taxon was very briefly diagnosed only by differences in color: “Coerulentis, ely- tris viridescentibus”. This name was never adopted as a valid name of a species or a sub- species. Following Article 45.6.4, such a name should be deemed infrasubspecific and unavailable from the original publication.

saxonicus Obenberger, 1920: 214. (Agrilus subauratus a. saxonicus, n. ab.) Proposed as an aberration of A. subauratus and thus is an unavailable name (Article 45.6.2).

8 © 2002 Magnolia Press JENDEK cyanescens Hellén, 1921: 45. (Agrilus subauratus ab. cyanescens m.) ZOOTAXA Proposed as an aberration of A. subauratus and thus is an unavailable name (Article 120 45.6.2). linearioides Obenberger, 1922: 22. (Agrilus amurensis a. linearioides m. n. ab.) Proposed as an aberration of A. amurensis and thus is an unavailable name (Article 45.6.2). euchryseus Obenberger, 1924: 47-48. (Agrilus amurensis var. euchryseus m. n. var.) The name euchryseus was proposed as a variety of A. amurensis. The content of the work unambiguously revealed that the name was proposed as an infrasubspecific entity, since the taxon was very briefly diagnosed only by differences in color: “Corpore supra toto laete aureoaeneo vel aureo”. This name was never adopted as a valid name of a spe- cies or a subspecies. Following Article 45.6.4, such a name should be deemed infrasubspe- cific and unavailable from the original publication. lineimargo Obenberger, 1924: 47. (Agrilus amurensis var. lineimargo m. n. var.) The name lineimargo was proposed for a variety of A. amurensis. The content of the work unambiguously revealed that the name was proposed as an infrasubspecific entity, since the taxon was very briefly diagnosed only by differences in color: “Corpore supra aeneo- vel cyaneoviridi, thoracis ac elytrorum lateribus tenuifer cupreo- vel purpureomar- ginatis”. This name was never adopted as a valid name of a species or a subspecies. Fol- lowing Article 45.6.4, such a name should be deemed infrasubspecific and unavailable from the original publication. burjaticus Obenberger, 1924: 47. (Agrilus amurensis var. burjaticus m. n. var.) The name burjaticus was proposed for a variety of A. amurensis. The content of the work unambiguously revealed that the name was proposed as an infrasubspecific entity, since the taxon was very briefly diagnosed only by differences in color: “Corpore supra uniformiter nigrocoerulescente, subtus cupreoviolaceo”. This name was never adopted as a valid name of a species or a subspecies. Following Article 45.6.4, such a name should be deemed infrasubspecific and unavailable from the original publication. fridolini Barovskij, 1925: 65. (Agrilus subauratus ab. fridolini nova) Proposed as an aberration of A. subauratus and thus is an unavailable name (Article 45.6.2). rubripennis Schaefer, 1946: 73. (Agr[ilus]. subauratus ab. rubripennis nov.) Proposed as an aberration of A. subauratus and thus is an unavailable name (Article 45.6.2).

AGRILUS NOMENCLATURE © 2002 Magnolia Press 9 ZOOTAXA Acknowledgements 120 My sincere thanks are due to C. L. Bellamy (Sacramento, California, USA) for linguistic revision of the manuscript. This work was partially supported by Grant No. 2/7176/20 from the Slovak Grant Agency for Science.

References

Abeille de Perrin, E. (1897) Notes sur les Buprestides paléarctiques (Suite). Revue d'Entomologie, 16, 1-33. Alexeev, A.V. & Volkovitsh, M.G., 1989: Obzor zhukov-zlatok (Coleoptera, Buprestidae) Mon- gol'skoi narodnoi respubliki, Nasekomye Mongolii, Leningrad, Nauka, 10, p. 301-368. (in Rus- sian) Barovskij, V.V. (1925) K poznaniyu entomofauny Ozernoi Oblasti. I. Contribution à la connais- sance de la faune des insectes de la Région Lacustre. I. Revue Russe d'Entomologie, 19 (1), 63- 68. (in Russian with French summary) Brahm, N.J. (1791) Insektenkalender für Sammler und Oekonomen. Handbuch der ökonomischen Insektengeschichte in Form eines Kalenders bearbeitet. Erster Theil, Mainz, Universitäts- buchandlung, LXLII & 248 pp. Bílý, S. (1982) The Buprestidae of Fennoscandia and Denmark. Fauna Entomologica Scandinav- ica, 10, 1-110. Curletti, G. (1987) Note tassonomiche su alcuni Buprestidi Italiani (Coleoptera, Buprestidae). Riv- ista Piemontese di Storia Naturale, 8, 149-153. Evenhuis, N.L. (1997) Litteratura taxonomica dipterorum (1758-1930). 2 vols., Leiden, Backhuys Publishers, 871 pp. Fabricius, J.C. (1777) Genera insectorum, eorumque characteres naturales secundum numerum, figuram situm et proportionem. Omnium partium oris adiecta mantissa specierum nuper detectarum. Chilonii, Mich. Friedr. Bartschii, 14 pp. & 310 pp. [Note: Date of publication: October 1777 (see Evenhuis, 1997: 246)]. Fleischer, A. (1930) P¯ehled broukÉ fauny feskoslovenské republiky. fasopis moravského musea zemského, Brno, 1927-1930 (25-27), Supplementum: 483 pp. Fourcroy, A.F. de (1785) Entomologia Parisiensis. Sive catalogus Insectorum quae in Agro Parisiensi reperiuntur. Secundum methodum Geoffraeanam in sectiones, genera & species dis- tributus: Cui addita funt nomina trivalia & fere trecentae novae Species. Paris, Via et aedibus Serpentineis. Pars Prima p. 8 pp. & 231 pp, Pars secunda p. 233- 544. Gebler, F. A. von (1833) Notae et addidamenta ad catalogum coleopterorum Sibiriae occidentalis et confinis Tatariae operis, C. F. von Ledebours Reise in das Altaigebirge und die soongarische Kirgisensteppe, (Zwyter Theil. Berlin 1830). Bulletin de la Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou, 6, 262-309. Gory, H.L. & Laporte de Castelnau, F.L. (1837) Histoire naturelle et iconographie des insectes coléoptères, publiée par monographies séparées. Suite aux buprestides. Tome II, Livraisons 12-16, Paris, P. Duménil, genera paged separately, [genera: Colobogaster, Chrysobothris, Agri- lus]. Hellén, W.E. (1921) Koleopterologische Mitteilungen aus Finnland. Notulae Entomologicae, 1, 43- 46. Herbst, J.F.W. (1801) Natursystem aller bekannten in- und ausländischen Insekten, als eine Fort- setzung der Büssonschen Naturgeschichte. Der Käfer neunter Theil, Berlin, Buchhandlung des Geh. Commerzien-Raths Bauti, 344 pp.

10 © 2002 Magnolia Press JENDEK ICZN (1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Fourth Edition, adopted by the ZOOTAXA International Union of Biological Sciences. London, International Trust for Zoological 120 Nomenclature, xxix & 306 pp. Jendek, E. (1995) Studies in the East Palaearctic species of the genus Agrilus (Coleoptera: Bupres- tidae). Part II. Entomological Problems, 26, 137-150. Jendek, E. (1998): Lectotype designations in the Palaearctic and Oriental Agrilus species (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) of the Oberthür's collection in the Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris. Acta Societatis Zoologicae Bohemicae, 62, 315-333. Jendek, E. (2002a) Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on Agrilus salicis Frivaldszky (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilinae). Zootaxa, 24, 1-6. Jendek, E. (2002b) Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on Agrilus suvorovi Obenberger (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilinae). Zootaxa, 52, 1-8. Jendek, E. (2002c) Nomenclatural notes on Agrilus angustulus (Illiger, 1803) (Coleoptera: Bupres- tidae: Agrilinae). Zootaxa, 57, 1-8. Jendek, E. (2002d) Nomenclatural and taxonomic notes on Agrilus cyanescens (Ratzeburg, 1837), A. pratensis (Ratzeburg, 1837) and A. convexicollis Redtenbacher, 1849 (Coleoptera: Bupres- tidae: Agrilinae). Zootaxa, 77, 1-11. Kiesenwetter, H. von, 1857: Buprestidae, Eucnemidae, Bogen 1-11, [Part of: Kiesenwetter H. von 1857-1863: Vierter Band, Buprestidae-Lymexylidae, Nachträge, Zusätze und Berichtigungen, VI & 746 pp.], p. 1-176. In: Erichson, W. F., Schaum, H., Kraatz, G. & Kiesenwetter, H. von (eds), Naturgeschichte der Insecten Deutschlands. Erste Abtheilung. Coleoptera. 4 Bände. Ber- lin, Nicolai. Linné, C. von (1767) Systema Naturae, per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Tomus I. Pars II. Classis V. Insecta., Editio XII, Vindobonae, Typis Ioannis Thomae nob. de Trattnern, pp. 533-1327 & 37 pp. Ménétriés, E. (1832) Catalogue raissonné des objets de Zoologie recueillis dans un voyage au Cau- case et jusqu'aux frontières actuelles de la Perse. St. Pétersbourg, L’Imprimerie de l’Académie Impériale des Sciences, 272 pp., 5 pls. Méquignon, A. (1928) Sur quelques Buprestides, Mélasides et Elatérides de France (Col.). Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France, No. 8, 130-134. Obenberger, J. (1914) Beitrag zur Kenntnis der palaearktischen Käferfauna. Coleopterologische Rundschau, 3, 1-32. Obenberger, J. (1917) Studien über paläarktische Buprestiden. II. Teil. Wiener Entomologische Zei- tung, 36, 209-218. Obenberger, J. (1920) Description d'Agrilus paléarctiques nouveaux (Col. Buprestidae). Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France, 1920, 212-214. Obenberger, J. (1922) De novis Buprestidarum regionis palaearcticae speciebus II. fasopis fesko- slovenské Spolegnosti Entomologické, 19, 18-29, 66-71. Obenberger, J. (1924) Symbolae ad specierum regionis palaearcticae Buprestidarum cognitionem. Jubilejní Sborník feskoslovenské Spolegnosti Entomologické, 1924, p. 6-59. Obenberger, J. (1934) Noví palaearktigtí krasci (Col. Bupr.). fasopis feskoslovenské Spolegnosti Entomologické, 31, 123. (in Latin) Obenberger, J. (1936) Buprestidae V., p. 935-1246. In: Junk, W. & Schenkling, S. (eds), Coleopter- orum Catalogus, Volumen XIII, Pars 152, Gravenhage, Verlag für Naturwissenschaften, W. Junk, 311 pp. Obenberger, J. (1960) Notes et études buprestologiques I. (Coleoptera). Buprestodologické studie I. Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Biologica, No. 2, 125-153. Pic, M. (1918) Notes diverses, descriptions et diagnoses (Suite). L'Échange, 34 (No 386), 1-3. Piller, M. & Mitterpacher, L. (1783) Iter per poseganam Sclavoniae provinciam mensibus Junio, et Julio anno MDCCLXXXII. Budae, Typis regiae universitatis, 147 pp., XI pl.

AGRILUS NOMENCLATURE © 2002 Magnolia Press 11 ZOOTAXA Ratzeburg, J.T.C. (1837) Die Forst-Insecten oder Abbildung und Beschreibung der in den Wäldern 120 Preufsens und der Nachbarstaaten als schädlich oder nützlich bekannt gewordenen Insekten. In systematischer Folge und mit besonderer Rücksicht auf die Vertilgung der Schädlichen. Erster Theil. Die Käfer. Berlin, Nicolai Buchhandlung, Druckerei der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, X & 202 pp. Rossi, P. (1790) Fauna Etrusca. Sistens Insecta, quae in provinciis Florentina et Pisana prasertim collegit Petrus Rossius in regio pisano athenaeo. Tomus primus, Liburni, Thomae Masi & Sociorum, XXII & 272 pp. Roubal, J. (1927) Koleopterologické poznámky. – Koleopterologische Notizen. fasopis feskoslov- enské Spolegnosti Entomologické, 24, 55-57. Saunders, E. (1870) Catalogue of the species contained in the genus Buprestis of Linnaeus, previ- ous to its subdivision by Eschscholtz in 1829, referring each to its present genus. London, John van Voorst, 37 pp. Schaefer, L. (1946) Formes nouvelles de Buprestides. Bulletin mensuel de la Société Linnéenne de Lyon, 6, 71-73. Schilsky, F.J. (1888) Beitrag zur Kenntnis der deutschen Käferfauna. Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, 32, 177-190. Schönherr, C.J. (1817) Synonymia Insectorum, oder Versuch einer Synonymie aller bisher bekannten Insecten nach Fabricii Systema Eleutheratorum etc. geordnet. Eleutherata oder Käfer. Erster Band. Dritter Theil. Hispa - Molorchus. Upsala, Em. Bruzelius, XI & 506 pp. Silfverberg, H. (1977) Nomenclatoric notes on Coleoptera Polyphaga. Notulae Entomologicae, 57, 91-94. Staig, R.A. (1940) The Fabrician types of Insects in the Hunterian collection at Glasgow Univer- sity. Coleoptera, Part II. Cambridge, University press, 164 pp. Théry, A. (1928) Études sur les Buprestides de l'Afrique du nord. Mémoires de la Société des Sci- ences Naturelles du Maroc, 19, 1-586. Théry, A. (1942a) Faune de France, 41, Coléoptères Buprestides. Paris, P. Lechevalier, 223 pp. Théry, A. (1942b) Buprestides de Mandchourie, de la collection Georg Frey (Col.). 2éme note. Mit- teilungen der Münchener Entomologischen Gesellschaft, 32 (1), 252-273. Thomson, C.G. (1864) Skandinaviens Coleoptera, synoptiskt bearbetade. Vol. VI, Lund, Tryckt uti lundbergska boktryckeriet, 385 pp. Thomson, J. (1878) Typi buprestidarum musaei Thomsoniani. Paris, E. Deyrolle, 103 pp. Zimsen, E. (1964) The type material of I. C. Fabricius. Munksgaard, Copenhagen, 656 pp.

12 © 2002 Magnolia Press JENDEK